DOCSLIB.ORG

Phenomenology of Particle Physics by Stephen Martin

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Phenomenology of Particle Physics by Stephen Martin Phenomenology of Particle Physics NIU Spring 2011 PHYS 686 Lecture Notes Stephen P. Martin Physics Department Northern Illinois University DeKalb IL 60115 [email protected] For corrections, see: http://zippy.physics.niu.edu/ppp/ January 5, 2011 Contents 1Introduction 4 1.1 Fundamentalforces............................... ........ 4 1.2 Resonances,widths,andlifetimes . ............. 5 1.3 Leptonsandquarks................................ ....... 5 1.4 Hadrons......................................... .... 7 1.5 Decays and branching ratios . .......... 11 2SpecialRelativityandLorentzTransformations 13 3Relativisticquantummechanicsofsingleparticles 23 3.1 Klein-Gordon and Dirac equations . ........... 23 3.2 Solutions of the Dirac equation . ........... 29 3.3 TheWeylequation ................................. ...... 37 3.4 Majoranafermions ................................ ....... 38 4Maxwell’sequationsandelectromagnetism 40 5FieldTheoryandLagrangians 42 5.1 The field concept and Lagrangian dynamics . ............ 42 5.2 Quantization of free scalar field theory . .............. 48 5.3 Quantization of free Dirac fermion field theory . ............... 53 1 6Interactingscalarfieldtheories 57 6.1 Scalar field with φ4 coupling.................................. 57 6.2 Scattering processes and cross-sections . ................ 61 6.3 Scalar field with φ3 coupling.................................. 69 6.4 Feynmanrules .................................... ..... 76 7QuantumElectro-Dynamics(QED) 83 7.1 QED Lagrangian and Feynman rules . ......... 83 7.2 e e+ µ µ+ .......................................... 91 − → − 7.3 e e+ ff............................................ 96 − → 7.4 Helicities in e e+ µ µ+ ..................................100 − → − 7.5 Bhabha scattering (e e+ e e+)..............................107 − → − 7.6 Crossingsymmetry................................ .......112 7.7 e µ+ e µ+ and e µ e µ ...............................114 − → − − − → − − 7.8 Møller scattering (e e e e )...............................116 − − → − − 7.9 Gauge invariance in Feynman diagrams . ...........117 7.10 Compton scattering (γe γe )...............................119 − → − 7.11 e+e γγ ...........................................126 − → 8Decayprocesses 128 8.1 Decay rates and partial widths . ..........128 8.2 Two-bodydecays.................................. ......129 8.3 Scalar decays to fermion-antifermion pairs; Higgs decay..................131 8.4 Three-bodydecays ................................ .......135 9Fermitheoryofweakinteractions 137 9.1 Weaknucleardecays ............................... .......137 9.2 Muondecay....................................... ....139 9.3 Correctionstomuondecay .......................... ........149 9.4 Inverse muon decay (e ν ν µ )..............................151 − µ → e − 9.5 e ν µ ν ..........................................153 − e → − µ 9.6 Charged currents and π± decay................................154 9.7 Unitarity, renormalizability, and the W boson........................160 10 Gauge theories 165 10.1 Groups and representations . ...........165 10.2 The Yang-Mills Lagrangian and Feynman rules . ..............175 2 11 Quantum Chromo-Dynamics (QCD) 182 11.1 QCD Lagrangian and Feynman rules . ..........182 11.2 Quark-quark scattering (qq qq)...............................184 → 11.3 Renormalization . ........186 11.4 Gluon-gluon scattering (gg gg)...............................196 → 11.5 The parton model, parton distribution functions, and hadron-hadron scattering . 197 11.6 Top-antitop production in pp and pp collisions........................205 11.7 Kinematics in hadron-hadron scattering . ...............209 + 11.8 Drell-Yan scattering (ℓ ℓ− production in hadron collisions) . 211 12 Spontaneous symmetry breaking 215 12.1 Global symmetry breaking . ..........215 12.2 Local symmetry breaking and the Higgs mechanism . ..............218 12.3 Goldstone’s Theorem and the Higgs mechanism in general .................222 13 The standard electroweak model 224 13.1 SU(2) U(1) representations and Lagrangian . 224 L × Y 13.2 The Standard Model Higgs mechanism . ...........229 13.3 Fermion masses and Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa mixing .................233 13.4 Neutrino masses and the seesaw mechanism . .............241 13.5 Search for the Standard Model Higgs boson . .............243 13.5.1 Higgs decays revisited . ........243 + 13.5.2 Limits from the LEP2 e−e collider .........................246 13.5.3 Searches at the Tevatron . ........247 13.5.4 Searches at the LHC . .....248 Appendix A: Natural units and conversions 250 Appendix B: Dirac Spinor Formulas 251 Appendix C: Further Reading 253 Index 253 3 1Introduction In this course, we will explore some of the tools necessary forattackingthefundamentalquestionsof elementary particle physics. These questions include: What fundamental particles is everything made out of? • How do the particles interact with each other? • What principles underlie the answers to these questions? • How can we use this information to predict and interpret the results of experiments? • The Standard Model of particle physics proposes some answerstothesequestions.Althoughitishighly doubtful that the Standard Model will survive intact beyond this decade, it is the benchmark against which future theories will be compared. Furthermore, it is highly likely that the new physics to be uncovered at the CERN Large Hadron Collider (LHC) can be described using the same set of tools. This Introduction contains a brief outline of the known fundamental particle content of the Standard Model, for purposes of orientation. These and many other experimental results about elementary particles can be found in the Review of Particle Properties,hereafterknownastheRPP,authored by the Particle Data Group, and in its pocket-sized abridged form, the Particle Physics Booklet.The current edition of the RPP was published as K. Nakamura et al. (Particle Data Group), J. Phys. G 37,075021(2010),andisaboutthesizeofatelephonebookdirectory for a city of 50,000 people. It is updated and republished every even-numbered year. An always-up-to-date version is available on- line, at http://pdg.lbl.gov,anditisusuallyconsideredthedefinitivesourceforelementary particle physics data and analysis. Each result is referenced according to the experiments that provided it. Background theoretical material needed for interpreting the results is also included. Copies can be ordered for free from their website. 1.1 Fundamental forces The known interaction forces in the Standard Model (besides the universal attraction of gravity) are the electromagnetic force, the weak nuclear force, and the strong nuclear force. These forces are mediated by the spin-1 (vector) bosons listed in Table 1: Boson Charge Mass (GeV/c2)Width(GeV/c2)Lifetime(sec)Force photon γ 00 0 EM ∞ W 180.399 0.023 2.085 0.042 3.14 10 25 weak ± ± ± ± × − Z0 091.1876 0.0021 2.4952 0.0023 2.64 10 25 weak ± ± × − gluon g 0“0” strong Table 1: The fundamental vector bosons of the Standard Model. 4 0 The photon is the mediator of the electromagnetic force, while the W ± and Z bosons mediate the + weak nuclear force, which is seen primarily in decays and in neutrino interactions. The W and W − bosons are antiparticles of each other, so they have exactly the some mass and lifetime. The gluon has an exact 8-fold degeneracy due to a degree of freedom known as “color”. Color is the charge associated with the strong nuclear force. Particles that carry net colorchargesarealwaysconfinedbythestrong nuclear force, meaning that they can only exist in bound states, Therefore, no value is listed for the gluon lifetime, and the entry “0” for its mass is meant to indicate only that the classical wave equation for it has the same character as that of the photon. Although the fundamental spin-1 bosons are often called force carriers, that is not their only role, since theyareparticlesintheirownright. 1.2 Resonances, widths, and lifetimes Table 1 also includes information about the width Γof the W and Z particle resonances, measured in units of mass, GeV/c2.Ingeneral,resonancescanbedescribedbyarelativisticBreit-Wigner lineshape, which gives the probability for the kinematic mass reconstructed from the production and decay of the particle to have a particular value M,intheidealizedlimitofperfectdetectorresolutionandanisolated state. For a particle of mass m,theprobabilityis: f(M) P (M)= , (1.1) (M 2 m2)2 + m2Γ(M)2 − where f(M)andΓ(M)arefunctionsthatusuallyvaryslowlyovertheresonanceregion M m,and ≈ thus can be treated as constants. The resonance width Γ Γ(m)isequivalenttothemeanlifetime, ≡ which appears in the next column of Table 1; they are related by 25 2 τ (in seconds) = (6.58212 10− )/[Γ(in GeV/c )]. (1.2) × The RPP lists the mean lifetime τ for some particles, and the width Γfor others. Actually, the Standard Model of particle physics predicts the width of the W boson far more accurately than the experimentally measured width indicated in Table 1. The predicted width, with uncertainties from input parameters, is Γ =2.091 0.002 GeV/c2. W ± 1.3 Leptons and quarks The remaining known indivisible constituents of matter are spin-1/2fermions,knownasleptons(those without strong nuclear interactions) and quarks (those withstrongnuclearinteractions).Allexperi- mental tests are consistent with the proposition that these particles have no substructure. The leptons are listed in Table 2. They consist of negatively charged electrons, muons, and taus, and weakly inter- acting neutrinos. There is now good evidence (from experiments
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Five Common Particles
    The Five Common Particles The world around you consists of only three particles: protons, neutrons, and electrons. Protons and neutrons form the nuclei of atoms, and electrons glue everything together and create chemicals and materials. Along with the photon and the neutrino, these particles are essentially the only ones that exist in our solar system, because all the other subatomic particles have half-lives of typically 10-9 second or less, and vanish almost the instant they are created by nuclear reactions in the Sun, etc. Particles interact via the four fundamental forces of nature. Some basic properties of these forces are summarized below. (Other aspects of the fundamental forces are also discussed in the Summary of Particle Physics document on this web site.) Force Range Common Particles It Affects Conserved Quantity gravity infinite neutron, proton, electron, neutrino, photon mass-energy electromagnetic infinite proton, electron, photon charge -14 strong nuclear force ≈ 10 m neutron, proton baryon number -15 weak nuclear force ≈ 10 m neutron, proton, electron, neutrino lepton number Every particle in nature has specific values of all four of the conserved quantities associated with each force. The values for the five common particles are: Particle Rest Mass1 Charge2 Baryon # Lepton # proton 938.3 MeV/c2 +1 e +1 0 neutron 939.6 MeV/c2 0 +1 0 electron 0.511 MeV/c2 -1 e 0 +1 neutrino ≈ 1 eV/c2 0 0 +1 photon 0 eV/c2 0 0 0 1) MeV = mega-electron-volt = 106 eV. It is customary in particle physics to measure the mass of a particle in terms of how much energy it would represent if it were converted via E = mc2.
    [Show full text]
  • Fundamentals of Particle Physics
    Fundamentals of Par0cle Physics Particle Physics Masterclass Emmanuel Olaiya 1 The Universe u The universe is 15 billion years old u Around 150 billion galaxies (150,000,000,000) u Each galaxy has around 300 billion stars (300,000,000,000) u 150 billion x 300 billion stars (that is a lot of stars!) u That is a huge amount of material u That is an unimaginable amount of particles u How do we even begin to understand all of matter? 2 How many elementary particles does it take to describe the matter around us? 3 We can describe the material around us using just 3 particles . 3 Matter Particles +2/3 U Point like elementary particles that protons and neutrons are made from. Quarks Hence we can construct all nuclei using these two particles -1/3 d -1 Electrons orbit the nuclei and are help to e form molecules. These are also point like elementary particles Leptons We can build the world around us with these 3 particles. But how do they interact. To understand their interactions we have to introduce forces! Force carriers g1 g2 g3 g4 g5 g6 g7 g8 The gluon, of which there are 8 is the force carrier for nuclear forces Consider 2 forces: nuclear forces, and electromagnetism The photon, ie light is the force carrier when experiencing forces such and electricity and magnetism γ SOME FAMILAR THE ATOM PARTICLES ≈10-10m electron (-) 0.511 MeV A Fundamental (“pointlike”) Particle THE NUCLEUS proton (+) 938.3 MeV neutron (0) 939.6 MeV E=mc2. Einstein’s equation tells us mass and energy are equivalent Wave/Particle Duality (Quantum Mechanics) Einstein E
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Particle Physics
    SFB 676 – Projekt B2 Introduction to Particle Physics Christian Sander (Universität Hamburg) DESY Summer Student Lectures – Hamburg – 20th July '11 Outline ● Introduction ● History: From Democrit to Thomson ● The Standard Model ● Gauge Invariance ● The Higgs Mechanism ● Symmetries … Break ● Shortcomings of the Standard Model ● Physics Beyond the Standard Model ● Recent Results from the LHC ● Outlook Disclaimer: Very personal selection of topics and for sure many important things are left out! 20th July '11 Introduction to Particle Physics 2 20th July '11 Introduction to Particle PhysicsX Files: Season 2, Episode 233 … für Chester war das nur ein Weg das Geld für das eigentlich theoretische Zeugs aufzubringen, was ihn interessierte … die Erforschung Dunkler Materie, …ähm… Quantenpartikel, Neutrinos, Gluonen, Mesonen und Quarks. Subatomare Teilchen Die Geheimnisse des Universums! Theoretisch gesehen sind sie sogar die Bausteine der Wirklichkeit ! Aber niemand weiß, ob sie wirklich existieren !? 20th July '11 Introduction to Particle PhysicsX Files: Season 2, Episode 234 The First Particle Physicist? By convention ['nomos'] sweet is sweet, bitter is bitter, hot is hot, cold is cold, color is color; but in truth there are only atoms and the void. Democrit, * ~460 BC, †~360 BC in Abdera Hypothesis: ● Atoms have same constituents ● Atoms different in shape (assumption: geometrical shapes) ● Iron atoms are solid and strong with hooks that lock them into a solid ● Water atoms are smooth and slippery ● Salt atoms, because of their taste, are sharp and pointed ● Air atoms are light and whirling, pervading all other materials 20th July '11 Introduction to Particle Physics 5 Corpuscular Theory of Light Light consist out of particles (Newton et al.) ↕ Light is a wave (Huygens et al.) ● Mainly because of Newtons prestige, the corpuscle theory was widely accepted (more than 100 years) Sir Isaac Newton ● Failing to describe interference, diffraction, and *1643, †1727 polarization (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Introduction 2 Klein Gordon Equation
    Thimo Preis 1 1 Introduction Non-relativistic quantum mechanics refers to the mathematical formulation of quantum mechanics applied in the context of Galilean relativity, more specifically quantizing the equations from the Hamiltonian formalism of non-relativistic Classical Mechanics by replacing dynamical variables by operators through the correspondence principle. Therefore, the physical properties predicted by the Schrödinger theory are invariant in a Galilean change of referential, but they do not have the invariance under a Lorentz change of referential required by the principle of relativity. In particular, all phenomena concerning the interaction between light and matter, such as emission, absorption or scattering of photons, is outside the framework of non-relativistic Quantum Mechanics. One of the main difficulties in elaborating relativistic Quantum Mechanics comes from the fact that the law of conservation of the number of particles ceases in general to be true. Due to the equivalence of mass and energy there can be creation or absorption of particles whenever the interactions give rise to energy transfers equal or superior to the rest massses of these particles. This theory, which i am about to present to you, is not exempt of difficulties, but it accounts for a very large body of experimental facts. We will base our deductions upon the six axioms of the Copenhagen Interpretation of quantum mechanics.Therefore, with the principles of quantum mechanics and of relativistic invariance at our disposal we will try to construct a Lorentz covariant wave equation. For this we need special relativity. 1.1 Special Relativity Special relativity states that the laws of nature are independent of the observer´s frame if it belongs to the class of frames obtained from each other by transformations of the Poincaré group.
    [Show full text]
  • Effective Dirac Equations in Honeycomb Structures
    Effective Dirac equations in honeycomb structures Effective Dirac equations in honeycomb structures Young Researchers Seminar, CERMICS, Ecole des Ponts ParisTech William Borrelli CEREMADE, Universit´eParis Dauphine 11 April 2018 It is self-adjoint on L2(R2; C2) and the spectrum is given by σ(D0) = R; σ(D) = (−∞; −m] [ [m; +1) The domain of the operator and form domain are H1(R2; C2) and 1 2 2 H 2 (R ; C ), respectively. Remark The negative spectrum is associated with antiparticles, in relativistic theories. Effective Dirac equations in honeycomb structures Dirac in 2D The 2D Dirac operator The 2D Dirac operator is defined as D = D0 +mσ3 = −i(σ1@1 + σ2@2) + mσ3: (1) where σk are the Pauli matrices and m ≥ 0 is the mass of the particle. It acts on C2-valued spinors. The domain of the operator and form domain are H1(R2; C2) and 1 2 2 H 2 (R ; C ), respectively. Remark The negative spectrum is associated with antiparticles, in relativistic theories. Effective Dirac equations in honeycomb structures Dirac in 2D The 2D Dirac operator The 2D Dirac operator is defined as D = D0 +mσ3 = −i(σ1@1 + σ2@2) + mσ3: (1) where σk are the Pauli matrices and m ≥ 0 is the mass of the particle. It acts on C2-valued spinors. It is self-adjoint on L2(R2; C2) and the spectrum is given by σ(D0) = R; σ(D) = (−∞; −m] [ [m; +1) Effective Dirac equations in honeycomb structures Dirac in 2D The 2D Dirac operator The 2D Dirac operator is defined as D = D0 +mσ3 = −i(σ1@1 + σ2@2) + mσ3: (1) where σk are the Pauli matrices and m ≥ 0 is the mass of the particle.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Field Theory*
    Quantum Field Theory y Frank Wilczek Institute for Advanced Study, School of Natural Science, Olden Lane, Princeton, NJ 08540 I discuss the general principles underlying quantum eld theory, and attempt to identify its most profound consequences. The deep est of these consequences result from the in nite number of degrees of freedom invoked to implement lo cality.Imention a few of its most striking successes, b oth achieved and prosp ective. Possible limitation s of quantum eld theory are viewed in the light of its history. I. SURVEY Quantum eld theory is the framework in which the regnant theories of the electroweak and strong interactions, which together form the Standard Mo del, are formulated. Quantum electro dynamics (QED), b esides providing a com- plete foundation for atomic physics and chemistry, has supp orted calculations of physical quantities with unparalleled precision. The exp erimentally measured value of the magnetic dip ole moment of the muon, 11 (g 2) = 233 184 600 (1680) 10 ; (1) exp: for example, should b e compared with the theoretical prediction 11 (g 2) = 233 183 478 (308) 10 : (2) theor: In quantum chromo dynamics (QCD) we cannot, for the forseeable future, aspire to to comparable accuracy.Yet QCD provides di erent, and at least equally impressive, evidence for the validity of the basic principles of quantum eld theory. Indeed, b ecause in QCD the interactions are stronger, QCD manifests a wider variety of phenomena characteristic of quantum eld theory. These include esp ecially running of the e ective coupling with distance or energy scale and the phenomenon of con nement.
    [Show full text]
  • B2.IV Nuclear and Particle Physics
    B2.IV Nuclear and Particle Physics A.J. Barr February 13, 2014 ii Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Nuclear 3 2.1 Structure of matter and energy scales . 3 2.2 Binding Energy . 4 2.2.1 Semi-empirical mass formula . 4 2.3 Decays and reactions . 8 2.3.1 Alpha Decays . 10 2.3.2 Beta decays . 13 2.4 Nuclear Scattering . 18 2.4.1 Cross sections . 18 2.4.2 Resonances and the Breit-Wigner formula . 19 2.4.3 Nuclear scattering and form factors . 22 2.5 Key points . 24 Appendices 25 2.A Natural units . 25 2.B Tools . 26 2.B.1 Decays and the Fermi Golden Rule . 26 2.B.2 Density of states . 26 2.B.3 Fermi G.R. example . 27 2.B.4 Lifetimes and decays . 27 2.B.5 The flux factor . 28 2.B.6 Luminosity . 28 2.C Shell Model § ............................. 29 2.D Gamma decays § ............................ 29 3 Hadrons 33 3.1 Introduction . 33 3.1.1 Pions . 33 3.1.2 Baryon number conservation . 34 3.1.3 Delta baryons . 35 3.2 Linear Accelerators . 36 iii CONTENTS CONTENTS 3.3 Symmetries . 36 3.3.1 Baryons . 37 3.3.2 Mesons . 37 3.3.3 Quark flow diagrams . 38 3.3.4 Strangeness . 39 3.3.5 Pseudoscalar octet . 40 3.3.6 Baryon octet . 40 3.4 Colour . 41 3.5 Heavier quarks . 43 3.6 Charmonium . 45 3.7 Hadron decays . 47 Appendices 48 3.A Isospin § ................................ 49 3.B Discovery of the Omega § ......................
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Computing for HEP Theory and Phenomenology
    Quantum Computing for HEP Theory and Phenomenology K. T. Matchev∗, S. Mrennay, P. Shyamsundar∗ and J. Smolinsky∗ ∗Physics Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA yFermi National Accelerator Laboratory, P. O. Box 500, Batavia, IL 60510, USA August 4, 2020 Quantum computing offers an exponential speed-up in computation times and novel approaches to solve existing problems in high energy physics (HEP). Current attempts to leverage a quantum advantage include: • Simulating field theory: Most quantum computations in field theory follow the algorithm outlined in [1{3]: a non-interacting initial state is prepared, adiabatically evolved in time to the interacting theory using an appropriate Hamiltonian, adiabatically evolved back to the free theory, and measured. Promising advances have been made in the encodings of lattice gauge theories [4{8]. Simplified calculations have been performed for particle decay rates [9], deep inelastic scattering structure functions [10, 11], parton distribution functions [12], and hadronic tensors [13]. Calculations of non-perturbative phenomena and effects are important inputs to Standard Model predictions. Quantum optimization has also been applied to tunnelling and vacuum decay problems in field theory [14, 15], which might lead to explanations of cosmological phenomena. • Showering, reconstruction, and inference: Quantum circuits can in principle simulate parton showers including spin and color correlations at the amplitude level [16, 17]. Recon- struction and analysis of collider events can be formulated as quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) problems, which can be solved using quantum techniques. These in- clude jet clustering [18], particle tracking [19,20], measurement unfolding [21], and anomaly detection [22]. • Quantum machine learning: Quantum machine learning has evolved in recent years as a subdiscipline of quantum computing that investigates how quantum computers can be used for machine learning tasks [23,24].
    [Show full text]
  • The Structure of Quarks and Leptons
    The Structure of Quarks and Leptons They have been , considered the elementary particles ofmatter, but instead they may consist of still smaller entities confjned within a volume less than a thousandth the size of a proton by Haim Harari n the past 100 years the search for the the quark model that brought relief. In imagination: they suggest a way of I ultimate constituents of matter has the initial formulation of the model all building a complex world out of a few penetrated four layers of structure. hadrons could be explained as combina­ simple parts. All matter has been shown to consist of tions of just three kinds of quarks. atoms. The atom itself has been found Now it is the quarks and leptons Any theory of the elementary particles to have a dense nucleus surrounded by a themselves whose proliferation is begin­ fl. of matter must also take into ac­ cloud of electrons. The nucleus in turn ning to stir interest in the possibility of a count the forces that act between them has been broken down into its compo­ simpler-scheme. Whereas the original and the laws of nature that govern the nent protons and neutrons. More recent­ model had three quarks, there are now forces. Little would be gained in simpli­ ly it has become apparent that the pro­ thought to be at least 18, as well as six fying the spectrum of particles if the ton and the neutron are also composite leptons and a dozen other particles that number of forces and laws were thereby particles; they are made up of the small­ act as carriers of forces.
    [Show full text]
  • The Quantum Epoché
    Accepted Manuscript The quantum epoché Paavo Pylkkänen PII: S0079-6107(15)00127-3 DOI: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2015.08.014 Reference: JPBM 1064 To appear in: Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology Please cite this article as: Pylkkänen, P., The quantum epoché, Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology (2015), doi: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2015.08.014. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT The quantum epoché Paavo Pylkkänen Department of Philosophy, History, Culture and Art Studies & the Academy of Finland Center of Excellence in the Philosophy of the Social Sciences (TINT), P.O. Box 24, FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland. and Department of Cognitive Neuroscience and Philosophy, School of Biosciences, University of Skövde, P.O. Box 408, SE-541 28 Skövde, Sweden [email protected] Abstract. The theme of phenomenology and quantum physics is here tackled by examining some basic interpretational issues in quantum physics. One key issue in quantum theory from the very beginning has been whether it is possible to provide a quantum ontology of particles in motion in the same way as in classical physics, or whether we are restricted to stay within a more limited view of quantum systems, in terms of complementary but mutually exclusiveMANUSCRIPT phenomena.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Lecture 1: Spinors, Their Properties and Spinor Prodcuts
    2 Lecture 1: spinors, their properties and spinor prodcuts Consider a theory of a single massless Dirac fermion . The Lagrangian is = ¯ i@ˆ . (2.1) L ⇣ ⌘ The Dirac equation is i@ˆ =0, (2.2) which, in momentum space becomes pUˆ (p)=0, pVˆ (p)=0, (2.3) depending on whether we take positive-energy(particle) or negative-energy (anti-particle) solutions of the Dirac equation. Therefore, in the massless case no di↵erence appears in equations for paprticles and anti-particles. Finding one solution is therefore sufficient. The algebra is simplified if we take γ matrices in Weyl repreentation where µ µ 0 σ γ = µ . (2.4) " σ¯ 0 # and σµ =(1,~σ) andσ ¯µ =(1, ~ ). The Pauli matrices are − 01 0 i 10 σ = ,σ= − ,σ= . (2.5) 1 10 2 i 0 3 0 1 " # " # " − # The matrix γ5 is taken to be 10 γ5 = − . (2.6) " 01# We can use the matrix γ5 to construct projection operators on to upper and lower parts of the four-component spinors U and V . The projection operators are 1 γ 1+γ Pˆ = − 5 , Pˆ = 5 . (2.7) L 2 R 2 Let us write u (p) U(p)= L , (2.8) uR(p) ! where uL(p) and uR(p) are two-component spinors. Since µ 0 pµσ pˆ = µ , (2.9) " pµσ¯ 0(p) # andpU ˆ (p) = 0, the two-component spinors satisfy the following (Weyl) equations µ µ pµσ uR(p)=0,pµσ¯ uL(p)=0. (2.10) –3– Suppose that we have a left handed spinor uL(p) that satisfies the Weyl equation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bound States of Dirac Equation with a Scalar Potential
    THE BOUND STATES OF DIRAC EQUATION WITH A SCALAR POTENTIAL BY VATSAL DWIVEDI THESIS Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Applied Mathematics in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2015 Urbana, Illinois Adviser: Professor Jared Bronski Abstract We study the bound states of the 1 + 1 dimensional Dirac equation with a scalar potential, which can also be interpreted as a position dependent \mass", analytically as well as numerically. We derive a Pr¨ufer-like representation for the Dirac equation, which can be used to derive a condition for the existence of bound states in terms of the fixed point of the nonlinear Pr¨uferequation for the angle variable. Another condition was derived by interpreting the Dirac equation as a Hamiltonian flow on R4 and a shooting argument for the induced flow on the space of Lagrangian planes of R4, following a similar calculation by Jones (Ergodic Theor Dyn Syst, 8 (1988) 119-138). The two conditions are shown to be equivalent, and used to compute the bound states analytically and numerically, as well as to derive a Calogero-like upper bound on the number of bound states. The analytic computations are also compared to the bound states computed using techniques from supersymmetric quantum mechanics. ii Acknowledgments In the eternity that is the grad school, this project has been what one might call an impulsive endeavor. In the 6 months from its inception to its conclusion, it has, without doubt, greatly benefited from quite a few individuals, as well as entities, around me, to whom I owe my sincere regards and gratitude.
    [Show full text]