L2 Processing Advantages of Multiword Sequences: Evidence from Eye-Tracking

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

L2 Processing Advantages of Multiword Sequences: Evidence from Eye-Tracking L2 Processing Advantages of Multiword Sequences: Evidence from Eye-Tracking Elma Kerz Arndt Heilmann Stella Neumann RWTH Aachen University RWTH Aachen University RWTH Aachen University elma.kerz@ arndt.heilmann@ stella.neumann@ ifaar.rwth-aachen.de ifaar.rwth-aachen.de ifaar.rwth-aachen.de Abstract the frequencies of individual words but also to the frequencies of word sequences (see, e.g., Chris- A substantial body of research has demon- strated that native speakers are sensitive to the tiansen and Arnon, 2017, for a recent overview). frequencies of multiword sequences (MWS). This questions the strict compartmentalization be- Here, we ask whether and to what extent tween the lexicon as a storage of individual words intermediate-advanced L2 speakers of English and a grammar as a set of rules or constrained used can also develop the sensitivity to the statistics to combine them. of MWS. To this end, we aimed to replicate Moving away from the traditional ‘words and the MWS frequency effects found for adult na- rules’ approach, emergentist approaches have put tive language speakers based on evidence from self-paced reading and sentence recall tasks forward alternative theoretical models of lan- in an ecologically more valid eye-tracking guage. Following the literature (see, e.g. Arnon study. L2 speakers’ sensitivity to MWS fre- and Snider, 2010; Kidd et al., 2017; MacWhin- quency was evaluated using generalized linear ney and O’Grady, 2015; Mitchell et al., 2013), mixed-effects regression with separate mod- we use the term ‘emergentist’ as a cover term els fitted for each of the four dependent mea- for a broad class of approaches to language in- sures. Mixed-effects modeling revealed sig- cluding usage-based (a.k.a. experience-based) nificantly faster processing of sentences con- models, constraint-based approaches, exemplar- taining MWS compared to sentences contain- ing equivalent control items across all eye- based models and connectionist models (for more tracking measures. Taken together, these find- general overviews, see, e.g., Beckner et al., ings suggest that, in line with emergentist ap- 2009; Christiansen and Chater, 2016a,b; Ellis and proaches, MWS are important building blocks Larsen-Freeman, 2006; Ellis, 2019; MacWhin- of language and that similar mechanisms un- ney, 2012; McClelland et al., 2010). Distinct derlie both native and non-native language from nativist/generative approaches, emergentist processing. approaches share the folowing two central as- 1 Introduction sumptions: First, emergentist approaches eschew the existence of Universal Grammar and instead 1.1 Emergentist approaches and statistical emphasize that language is learnable via general learning cognitive mechanisms. Second, these approaches A widely held assumption in the language sci- put the emphasis on usage and/or experience with ences, including psycholinguistics, has long been language and assume a direct and immediate re- the ‘words and rules’ view (Levelt, 1993; Jackend- lationship between processing and learning, con- off and Jackendoff, 2002; Pinker, 1999): In this ceiving of them as inseparable rather than gov- view, speakers/writers generate sentences by com- erned by different mechanisms (‘two sides of the bining words according to the grammatical rules same coin’). In these approaches, language acqui- of their language, and listeners/readers compre- sition is viewed as learning how to process effi- hend sentences by looking up words in their men- ciently (see, the ‘learning-as-processing’ assump- tal lexicon and combining them using the same tion, Chang, Dell, and Bock, 2006; see also ‘lan- rules. This view has been challenged recently by guage acquisition as skill learning’ Chater and an accumulating body of evidence demonstrating Christiansen, 2018). One of the major advances that language users are highly sensitive not only to in the language sciences across theoretical orienta- 60 Proceedings of the Joint Workshop on Multiword Expressions and WordNet (MWE-WN 2019), pages 60–69 Florence, Italy, August 2, 2019. c 2019 Association for Computational Linguistics tions has been the recognition that language con- occur is thus a driving force behind chunking and, sists of complex, highly variable patterns occur- all else being equal, each exposure to a given se- ring in sequence, and as such can be described quence of words (sounds or graphemes) will affect in terms of statistical or distributional relations its subsequent processing. But why is there a need among language units (see, e.g., Redington and for chunking? To ameliorate the effects of the Chater, 1997). Thus, learning a language heav- ‘real-time’ constraints on language processing im- ily involves figuring out the statistics inherent in posed by the limitations of human sensory system language input. This is supported by a large body and human memory in combination with the con- of evidence from the literature on statistical learn- tinual deluge of language input (cf., Christiansen ing. Statistical learning – defined as the mecha- and Chater, 2016a,b, for the ‘Now-or-Never bot- nism by which language users discover the pat- tleneck’), through constant exposure to (both au- terns inherent in the language input based on its ditory and visual) language input, humans learn distributional properties – has been shown to facil- to rapidly and efficiently recode incoming infor- itate the acquisition of various aspects of language mation into larger sequences. The fact that lan- knowledge, including phonological learning (e.g., guage is abundant in statistical regularities at mul- Maye et al., 2008; Thiessen and Saffran, 2003), tiple levels of language representations and that word segmentation (e.g., Onnis et al., 2008; Saf- humans are able to detect such regularities via sta- fran et al., 1996), learning the graphotactic and tistical learning allows for such chunking to take morphological regularities of written words (e.g., place. The by-products of statistical learning and Pacton et al., 2005), learning to form syntactic and chunking enable anticipatory language processing semantic categories and structures (e.g., Lany and humans rely on to integrate the greatest possible Saffran, 2010; Saffran and Wilson, 2003; Thomp- amount of available information as fast as pos- son and Newport, 2007). Furthermore, an impres- sible. Processing a MWS as a chunk will min- sive body of evidence has been accumulating over imize memory load and speed up integration of the last years indicating a close relationship be- the MWS with prior context (see, a chunk-based tween individual differences in statistical learning computational model presented in a recent study ability and variation in native language learning in by McCauley and Christiansen, 2019). both child and adult L1 populations (e.g., Conway et al., 2010; Kidd and Arciuli, 2016; Misyak and 1.2 MultiWord Frequency Effects in Online Christiansen, 2012; Siegelman and Frost, 2015), Processing and in adult L2 populations (e.g., Ettlinger et al., 2016; Frost et al., 2013; Onnis et al., 2016). Thus, There is now an extensive body of evidence from an emergentist perspective, language acqui- demonstrating that language users are sensitive sition is essentially an ‘intuitive statistical learning to the input frequency across all levels of lin- problem’ (Ellis, 2008, p. 376). guistic analysis (Ellis, 2002; Diessel, 2007; Juraf- sky, 2003). An accumulating body of evidence Emergentist approaches have developed a grow- now suggests that frequency effects also extend ing interest in the role of multiword sequences to the processing of MWS. Children and adults (henceforth MWS), also commonly referred to as are shown to be sensitive to the statistics of MWS ’formulaic sequences’ (Wray, 2013). MWS are and rely on knowledge of such statistics to facil- succinctly defined as variably-sized compositional itate language processing and boost their acquisi- recurring sequence patterns comprised of multiple tion (for overviews, see, Christiansen and Arnon, words (for a recent overview, see Arnon and Chris- 2017; Shaoul and Westbury, 2011). tiansen, 2017). Three mechanisms that have been In the area of native language processing, a proposed to underpin frequency effects specifi- number of comprehension and production stud- cally in learning word sequences are described as ies have provided evidence of processing advan- follows (Diessel, 2007): [1] increased frequency tages for MWS over non-MWS (see, e.g., Arnon causes the strengthening of linguistic representa- and Snider, 2010; Bannard and Matthews, 2008; tions, [2] increased frequency causes the strength- Conklin and Schmitt, 2012; Durrant and Doherty, ening of expectations and [3] increased frequency 2010; Tremblay et al., 2011). Many of these leads to the automatization of chunks. The fre- studies follow an approach where the target stim- quency with which building blocks of language uli are restricted to a certain frequency thresh- 61 old. The threshold-approach studies aimed to de- than two words. The few existing studies have termine whether and to what extent MWS – i.e., produced inconsistent results: Some studies found more precisely ‘lexical bundles’ (LB)– are pro- frequency effects in processing of MWS in non- cessed faster over less frequent counterparts (non- native speakers (e.g. Jiang and Nekrasova, 2007), LB). The stimulus material is typically derived whereas other studies found no such effects (e.g. from language corpora based on predefined fre- Babaei et al., 2015). In addition, these previ- quency
Recommended publications
  • Implicit and Explicit Knowledge About Language
    Comp. by: TPrasath Date:27/12/06 Time:22:59:29 Stage:First Proof File Path:// spiina1001z/womat/production/PRODENV/0000000005/0000001817/0000000016/ 0000233189.3D Proof by: QC by: NICK ELLIS IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT KNOWLEDGE ABOUT LANGUAGE INTRODUCTION Children acquire their first language (L1) by engaging with their caretakers in natural meaningful communication. From this “evidence” they automatically acquire complex knowledge of the structure of their language. Yet paradoxically they cannot describe this knowledge, the discovery of which forms the object of the disciplines of theoretical lin- guistics, psycholinguistics, and child language acquisition. This is a difference between explicit and implicit knowledge—ask a young child how to form a plural and she says she does not know; ask her “here is a wug, here is another wug, what have you got?” and she is able to reply, “two wugs.” The acquisition of L1 grammar is implicit and is extracted from experience of usage rather than from explicit rules—simple expo- sure o normal linguistic input suffices and no explicit instruction is needed. Adult acquisition of second language (L2) is a different matter in that what can be acquired implicitly from communicative contexts is typically quite limited in comparison to native speaker norms, and adult attainment of L2 accuracy usually requires additional resources of explicit learning. The various roles of consciousness in second language acquisi- tion (SLA) include: the learner noticing negative evidence; their attending to language form, their perception focused by social scaffolding or explicit instruction; their voluntary use of pedagogical grammatical descriptions and analogical reasoning; their reflective induction of metalinguistic insights about language; and their consciously guided practice which results, eventually, in unconscious, automatized skill.
    [Show full text]
  • 19 First Language Acquisition
    466 Brian MacWhinney 19 First Language Acquisition BRIAN MACWHINNEY Nothing can make a parent prouder than a child’s first word. Whether it be “Mama,” “Papa,” or even “kitty,” we all recognize the first word as a major milestone in the child’s development – a clear token of the child’s entrance into a fuller membership in human society. We emphasize the child’s first word, because of the enormous importance that we place on language as a way of communicating with other people After all, we reason, the only species that uses language is the human species. Moreover, it is through language that we come to understand the deepest secrets of other people and come to appreciate the extent to which we share a common humanity. Fortunately, the ability to acquire language is present in almost every human child (Lenneberg 1967). Children who are born blind have few problems learning to speak, although they may occasionally be confused about words for colors or geographic locations. Children who are born deaf readily acquire a rich system of signs, as long as they are exposed to native sign language speakers. Even a child like Helen Keller, who has lost both hearing and sight, can still acquire language through symbols expressed in touch and motion. Children with neurological disorders, such as brain lesions or hydrocephalus, often acquire complete control over spoken language, despite a few months of early delay. Children with the most extreme forms of mental retardation are still able to acquire the basic units of human communication. Given the pervas- iveness and inevitability of first language acquisition, we often tend to take the process of language learning for granted.
    [Show full text]
  • Implicit and Explicit Learning of Languages Patrick Rebuschat
    Introduction: Implicit and explicit learning of languages Patrick Rebuschat (Lancaster University) Introduction to the forthcoming volume: Rebuschat, P. (Ed.) (in press, 2015). Implicit and explicit learning of languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Implicit learning, essentially the process of acquiring unconscious (implicit) knowledge, is a fundamental feature of human cognition (Cleeremans, Destrebecqz, & Boyer, 1998; Dienes, 2012; Perruchet, 2008; Shanks, 2005; Reber, 1993). Many complex behaviors, including language comprehension and production (Berry & Dienes, 1993; Winter & Reber, 1994), music cognition (Rohrmeier & Rebuschat, 2012), intuitive decision making (Plessner, Betsch, & Betsch, 2008), and social interaction (Lewicki, 1986), are thought to be largely dependent on implicit knowledge. The term implicit learning was first used by Arthur Reber (1967) to describe a process during which subjects acquire knowledge about a complex, rule-governed stimulus environment without intending to and without becoming aware of the knowledge they have acquired. In contrast, the term explicit learning refers to a process during which participants acquire conscious (explicit) knowledge; this is generally associated with intentional learning conditions, e.g., when participants are instructed to look for rules or patterns. In his seminal study, Reber (1967) exposed subjects to letter sequences (e.g., TPTS, VXXVPS and TPTXXVS) by means of a memorization task. In experiment 1, subjects were presented with letter sequences and simply asked to commit them to memory. One group of subjects was given sequences that were generated by means of a finite-state grammar (Chomsky, 1956, 1957; Chomsky & Miller, 1958), while the other group received randomly 1 constructed sequences. The results showed that grammatical letter sequences were learned more rapidly than random letter sequences.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction: Reconciling Approaches to Intra-Individual Variation in Psycholinguistics and Variationist Sociolinguistics
    Linguistics Vanguard 2021; 7(s2): 20200027 Lars Bülow* and Simone E. Pfenninger Introduction: Reconciling approaches to intra-individual variation in psycholinguistics and variationist sociolinguistics https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2020-0027 Abstract: The overall theme of this special issue is intra-individual variation, that is, the observable variation within individuals’ behaviour, which plays an important role in the humanities area as well as in the social sciences. While various fields have recognised the complexity and dynamism of human thought and behav- iour, intra-individual variation has received less attention in regard to language acquisition, use and change. Linguistic research so far lacks both empirical and theoretical work that provides detailed information on the occurrence of intra-individual variation, the reasons for its occurrence and its consequences for language development as well as for language variation and change. The current issue brings together two sub- disciplines – psycholinguistics and variationist sociolinguistics – in juxtaposing systematic and non- systematic intra-individual variation, thereby attempting to build a cross-fertilisation relationship between two disciplines that have had surprisingly little connection so far. In so doing, we address critical stock-taking, meaningful theorizing and methodological innovation. Keywords: psycholinguistics, variationist sociolinguistics, intra-individual variation, intra-speaker variation, SLA, language variation and change, language development 1 Intra-individual variation in psycholinguistics and variationist sociolinguistics The overall theme of this special issue is intra-individual variation, that is, the observable variation within individuals’ behaviour, which plays an important role in the humanities area as well as in the social sciences. While various fields have acknowledged the complexity and dynamism of human behaviour, intra-individual variation has received less attention in regard to language use.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Approaches to Second Language Acquisition: Universal Grammar and Emergentism
    English Teaching, Vol. 75, Supplement 1, Summer 2020, pp. 3-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.75.s1.202006.3 http://journal.kate.or.kr Two Approaches to Second Language Acquisition: Universal Grammar and Emergentism William O’Grady and Kitaek Kim* 1. THE TWO APPROACHES TO SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION Language presents us with many questions. Why does it have certain properties and features, but not others? Why does it vary and change in the ways that it does? How is it acquired with such ease by young children despite its evident complexity? And why do adults find it so difficult to acquire a second language (L2), despite their cognitive maturity and their access to well-designed pedagogical programs? An impressive feature of Universal Grammar (UG), as it was traditionally conceived, is that it offers an integrated explanatory narrative—an inborn system of grammatical principles stipulates the architecture of language, including limits on variation and change, while also shedding light on the apparent magic of first language acquisition. With the help of additional assumptions, such as the full-transfer/full-access proposal of Bonnie D. Schwartz and Rex Sprouse (1996), it is even possible to offer an explanation for why the mastery of a L2 proves so challenging, but is perhaps nonetheless attainable. Parts of the discussion in the first section of this paper appeared in O’Grady, Lee, and Kwak (2009). *Corresponding Author: William O’Grady, Professor, Department of Linguistics, University of Hawaii at Manoa, 1890 East-West Road, Moore 569, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA; E-mail: [email protected] Co-Author: Kitaek Kim, Professor, Department of English Language Education, Seoul National University Received 10 June 2020; Reviewed 17 June 2020; Accepted 25 June 2020 © 2020 The Korea Association of Teachers of English (KATE) This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits anyone to copy, redistribute, remix, transmit and adapt the work provided the original work and source is appropriately cited.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded for Free
    Salem State University From the SelectedWorks of Sovicheth Boun March 24, 2014 A Critical Examination Of Language Ideologies And Identities Of Cambodian Foreign-Trained University Lecturers Of English Sovicheth Boun Available at: https://works.bepress.com/sovicheth-boun/2/ Table of Contents General Conference Information ....................................................................................................................................................................... 3-­‐13 Welcome Messages from the President and the Conference Chair ........................................................................................................................ 3 Conference Program Committee .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Registration Information, Exhibit Hall Coffee Hours, Breaks, Internet Access, Conference Evaluation ................................................ 4 Strand Coordinators and Abstract Readers .................................................................................................................................................................. 5-­‐6 Student Volunteers, Individual Sessions and Roundtable Sessions Instructions ............................................................................................ 7 Conference Sponsors .............................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Part I: Perspectives on Usage in L2 Learning and Teaching
    Part I: Perspectives on usage in L2 learning and teaching Brian MacWhinney Multidimensional SLA Complex natural phenomena, such as human language, are shaped by processes operating on very different scales in both time and space (MacWhinney, in press). Consider the case of timescales in Geology. When geologists study rock outcrops they need to consider the results of general processes such as vulcanism, orogeny, glaciation, continental drift, erosion, sedimentation, and metamorphism. Within each of these larger processes, such as vulcanism, there are many microprocesses operating across smaller timescales. For example, once the pressure in the magma chamber reaches a certain level, there can be a slow outpouring of lava or sudden explosions. Pressure can be released through steam vents with geysers operating at regular intervals. The lava may enter lakes or oceans forming pillows or it may rest in underground chambers forming columnar basalt. The variations in these volcanic processes and their interactions with each other and plate tectonics are extensive. The same is true of human language. Within human populations, the ability to articulate and process sounds has emerged across millennia of ongoing changes in physiology and neurology. Within particular language communities, ongoing change is driven by language contact, dialect shift, and group formation. Within individuals, language learning involves a continual adaptation for both first and second languages. Within individual conversations, all of these forces come together, as people work out their mutual plans, goals, and disagreements, using language. Each of these space-time frames interacts with the others at the actual moment of language use. To fully understand the process of second language acquisition (SLA), we must place it within this multidimensional context, both theoretically and prac- tically.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4 the Mental Lexicon of Multilingual Adult Learners of Italian L3: a Study of Word Association Behavior and Cross-Lingual Semantic Priming
    Chapter 4 The mental lexicon of multilingual adult learners of Italian L3: A study of word association behavior and cross-lingual semantic priming Anna Gudmundson Stockholm University This study, a partial replication of the study conducted by Fitzpatrick & Izura (2011) on bilingual speakers, investigates the structure and processing of the mental lex- icon of multilingual speakers of first language (L1) Swedish, second language (L2) English and third language (L3) Italian in order of acquisition. By way of word association tasks in all three languages, the effect of language status (L1, L2, L3) and association category (i.e., the different kinds of word association responses) on reaction time (RT) and association distribution (i.e., proportion of associations in different association categories) is measured. Results show a significant effect of language status on association distribution and on RT. The present study also investigates the effect of long-term cross-lingual semantic priming and lexical me- diation between L3 and L2 in a lexical decision task (LDT), i.e. if the activation of L3 conceptual information is mediated by the corresponding word form in the L2. The primes in this study are English words whose Italian translation equiva- lents were present in the prior L3 Italian word association task. The translation equivalents obtained shorter RTs compared to control words, which indicates that L2 English words were activated during the L3 Italian word association task. The kind of cross-lingual priming found in the multilinguals investigated in this study would imply that, besides the L1, also an L2 could mediate in lexical processing, and that the L1 does not have a privileged status in that respect.
    [Show full text]
  • Language Learning Research at the Intersection of Experimental, Computational and Corpus-Based Approaches Patrick Rebuschat
    Language learning research at the intersection of experimental, computational and corpus-based approaches (1,2) (2,3) (1,4) Patrick Rebuschat ,​ Detmar Meurers ,​ and Tony McEnery ​ ​ ​ (1) (2) Department​ of Linguistics and English Language, Lancaster University; LEAD​ Graduate ​ (3) School and Research Network, University of Tübingen; Seminar​ für Sprachwissenschaft, ​ ​ ​ (4) University of Tübingen; ESRC​ Centre for Corpus Approaches to Social Science ​ Keywords: Psycholinguistics; corpus linguistics; computational linguistics; natural language processing; first language acquisition; second language acquisition; multimethod approaches; interdisciplinary research Acknowledgements: Our research was supported by the Economic and Social Research Council, UK (grant ES/K002155/1) and by the LEAD Graduate School & Research Network (grant DFG-GSC1028), a project of the Excellence Initiative of the German federal and state governments. Correspondence: Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Patrick Rebuschat, Department of Linguistics and English Language, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YL, United Kingdom, E-mail: [email protected]. Language acquisition occupies a central place in the study of human cognition, and research on how we learn language can be found across many disciplines, from developmental psychology and linguistics to education, philosophy and neuroscience. It is a very challenging topic to investigate given that the learning target in first and second language acquisition is highly complex, and part of the challenge consists in identifying how different domains of language are acquired to form a fully functioning system of usage (Ellis, this volume). Correspondingly, the evidence about language use and language learning is generally shaped by many factors, including the characteristics of the task in which the language is produced (Alexopoulou et al, this volume).
    [Show full text]
  • Preprint Ellis, NC (2013). Second Language Acquisition. in Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar
    Second Language Acquisition Nick C. Ellis University of Michigan [email protected] preprint Ellis, N. C. (2013). Second language acquisition. In Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar (pp. 365-378), G. Trousdale & T. Hoffmann (Eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1. Introduction Usage-based approaches hold that we learn linguistic constructions while engaging in communication, the “interpersonal communicative and cognitive processes that everywhere and always shape language” (Slobin 1997). Constructions are form-meaning mappings, conventionalized in the speech community, and entrenched as language knowledge in the learner’s mind. They are the symbolic units of language relating the defining properties of their morphological, syntactic, and lexical form with particular semantic, pragmatic, and discourse functions (Bates and MacWhinney 1987; Lakoff 1987; Langacker 1987; Croft 2001; Croft and Cruse 2004; Goldberg 1995, 2003, 2006; Tomasello 2003; Robinson and Ellis 2008; Bybee 2008). Broadly, Construction Grammar argues that all grammatical phenomena can be understood as learned pairings of form (from morphemes, words, and idioms, to partially lexically filled and fully general phrasal patterns) and their associated semantic or discourse functions. Such beliefs, increasingly influential in the study of child language acquisition, have turned upside down generative assumptions of innate language acquisition devices, the continuity hypothesis, and top-down, rule-governed, processing, bringing back data-driven, emergent accounts of linguistic systematicities. Constructionist theories of child first language acquisition (L1A) use dense longitudinal corpora to chart the emergence of creative linguistic competence from children’s analyses of the utterances in their usage history and from their abstraction of regularities within them (Goldberg 1995, 2006, 2003; Diessel, this volume; Tomasello 1998; Tomasello 2003).
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Linguistics for Linguistic Complexity, Pages 1–11, Osaka, Japan, December 11-17 2016
    CL4LC 2016 Computational Linguistics for Linguistic Complexity Proceedings of the Workshop December 11, 2016 Osaka, Japan Copyright of each paper stays with the respective authors (or their employers). ISBN 978-4-87974-709-9 ii Preface Welcome to the first edition of the “Computational Linguistics for Linguistic Complexity” workshop (CL4LC)! CL4LC aims at investigating “processing” aspects of linguistic complexity with the objective of promoting a common reflection on approaches for the detection, evaluation and modelling of linguistic complexity. What has motivated such a focus on linguistic complexity? Although the topic of linguistic complexity has attracted researchers for quite some time, this concept is still poorly defined and often used with different meanings. Linguistic complexity indeed is inherently a multidimensional concept that must be approached from various perspectives, ranging from natural language processing (NLP), second language acquisition (SLA), psycholinguistics and cognitive science, as well as contrastive linguistics. In 2015, a one-day workshop dedicated to the question of Measuring Linguistic Complexity was organized at the catholic University of Louvain (UCL) with the aim of identifying convergent approaches in diverse fields addressing linguistic complexity from their specific viewpoint. Not only did the workshop turn out to be a great success, but it strikingly pointed out that more in–depth thought is required in order to investigate how research on linguistic complexity and its processing aspects could actually benefit from the sharing of definitions, methodologies and techniques developed from different perspectives. CL4LC stems from these reflections and would like to go a step further towards a more multifaceted view of linguistic complexity. In particular, the workshop would like to investigate processing aspects of linguistic complexity both from a machine point of view and from the perspective of the human subject in order to pinpoint possible differences and commonalities.
    [Show full text]
  • Language Development Brian Macwhinney
    P1: HEF/FGC P2: HEF/FGC QC: HEF/FGC T1: HEF 0521651174c42.xml CU1767B-Hopkins November 19, 2004 21:58 Language development brian macwhinney Introduction hard-wired instinct and the view of language as an emergent process, let us review a few basic facts about Almost every human child succeeds in learning the developmental course of language acquisition and language. As a result, people often tend to take the some of the methods used to study it. process of language learning for granted. To many, language seems like a basic instinct, as simple as breathing or blinking. But, in fact, language is the most Early auditory development complex ability that a human being will ever master. The fact that all people succeed in learning to use William James (1890) described the world of the language, whereas not all people learn to swim or do newborn as a “blooming, buzzing confusion.” However, calculus, demonstrates how fully language conforms we now know that, at the auditory level at least, the to our human nature. In a very real sense, language is newborn’s world is remarkably well structured. The the complete expression of what it means to be cochlea and auditory nerve provide extensive pre- human. processing of signals for frequency and intensity. In the Linguists in the Chomskyan tradition (Pinker, 1994) 1970s and 1980s, researchers discovered that human tend to think of language as having a universal core from infants were specifically adapted at birth to perceive which individual languages select out a particular contrasts such as that between /p/ and /b/, as in pit and configuration of optional features known technically as bit.Subsequent research showed that even chinchillas ‘parameters’ (Chomsky, 1982).
    [Show full text]