DOCSLIB.ORG

The Bridge Between Transplantation and Regenerative Medicine: Beginning a New Banff Classification of Tissue Engineering Pathology

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Bridge Between Transplantation and Regenerative Medicine: Beginning a New Banff Classification of Tissue Engineering Pathology Received: 28 April 2017 | Revised: 21 November 2017 | Accepted: 24 November 2017 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14610 PERSONAL VIEWPOINT The bridge between transplantation and regenerative medicine: Beginning a new Banff classification of tissue engineering pathology K. Solez1 | K. C. Fung1 | K. A. Saliba1 | V. L. C. Sheldon2 | A. Petrosyan3 | L. Perin3 | J. F. Burdick4 | W. H. Fissell5 | A. J. Demetris6 | L. D. Cornell7 1Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and The science of regenerative medicine is arguably older than transplantation—the first Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, major textbook was published in 1901—and a major regenerative medicine meeting AB, Canada took place in 1988, three years before the first Banff transplant pathology meeting. 2Medical Anthropology Program, Department of Anthropology, Faculty of Arts and However, the subject of regenerative medicine/tissue engineering pathology has Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, never received focused attention. Defining and classifying tissue engineering pathol- Ontario, Canada ogy is long overdue. In the next decades, the field of transplantation will enlarge at 3Division of Urology GOFARR Laboratory for Organ Regenerative Research and least tenfold, through a hybrid of tissue engineering combined with existing ap- Cell Therapeutics, Children’s Hospital Los proaches to lessening the organ shortage. Gradually, transplantation pathologists will Angeles, Saban Research Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA become tissue- (re- ) engineering pathologists with enhanced skill sets to address con- 4Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins cerns involving the use of bioengineered organs. We outline ways of categorizing ab- School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA normalities in tissue- engineered organs through traditional light microscopy or other 5Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA modalities including biomarkers. We propose creating a new Banff classification of 6Department of Pathology, University of tissue engineering pathology to standardize and assess de novo bioengineered solid Pittsburgh, UPMC-Montefiore, Pittsburgh, organs transplantable success in vivo. We recommend constructing a framework for a PA, USA classification of tissue engineering pathology now with interdisciplinary consensus 7Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA discussions to further develop and finalize the classification at future Banff Transplant Pathology meetings, in collaboration with the human cell atlas project. A possible no- Correspondence K. Solez sology of pathologic abnormalities in tissue- engineered organs is suggested. Email: [email protected] KEYWORDS Funding information Roche Organ Transplantation Research bioengineering, biomarker, biopsy, cellular transplantation (non-islet), classification systems: Foundation, Grant/Award Number: Banff classification, editorial/personal viewpoint, pathology/histopathology, regenerative 608390948 medicine, tissue injury and repair, translational research/science 1 | INTRODUCTION 10% of this number. Regenerative medicine/tissue engineering can re- habilitate suboptimal donor organs, thereby considerably expanding Worldwide approximately 1.2 million people need transplantation for the current donor organ pool, and has the potential to save the re- end stage organ failure.1 Current transplant protocols reach fewer than maining 90%, by generating or repairing organs. Rapid advances are Abbreviations: HCAP, Human cell atlas project; TEP, Tissue engineering pathology; TET, Tissue engineering transplantation. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. © 2017 The Authors. American Journal of Transplantation published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons Am J Transplant. 2018;18:321–327. amjtransplant.com | 321 322 | SOLEZ ET AL. also being made in other areas to increase the donor pool, including monitoring after transplantation will be crucial to the success of this xenotransplantation,2 tolerance induction,3 ex vivo perfusion,4 organ new medical discipline. Some of this monitoring will be via soluble preservation and banking,5 and more traditional approaches.6 If the biomarkers,7 or possibly employing implantable sensors as well as by field of transplantation is to be increased tenfold or more in size to fill more traditional pathology techniques. the expanding need for organ replacement, regenerative medicine will In this paper, we define a new pathology discipline, tissue engineering be the major cause of this improvement, but there will be many other pathology, and propose a basic construct for a new Banff classification of secondary causes in addition. A hybrid of these different modalities this new discipline, with the aim of having the first full version of the clas- working in concert is likely the most appropriate model for the future sification finalized through consensus discussions at the 2021, 2023, and of transplantation, with tissue engineering/regenerative medicine ap- 2025 Banff allograft pathology meetings. It will be along organ lines, simi- proaches eventually becoming the dominant approach (Table 1). lar to the current Banff classification scheme8–10 but with a focus entirely The future safety and efficacy of bioengineered tissues and organs separate from the current scheme. Since it is likely that the new Tissue is crucial to long- term transplantation success. It cannot be assumed Engineering Pathology classification will overlap with the current Banff that every rehabilitated or stem cell- generated organ has normal struc- classification for at least a decade, it is important that it be constructed in ture and function and will provide net benefit to the patient. Indeed a fashion that will not be confused with the current Transplant Pathology a first branch point in a taxonomy of engineered organs—be they classification, so both classifications can easily be scored simultaneously. repopulated scaffolds or cells on chips—is distinguishing deviations from a gold standard healthy functioning native organ arising from engineering decisions or problems of generation, versus problems of 2 | HISTORY AND BACKGROUND deterioration in situ. Pathologic examination of organs produced by regenerative medicine/tissue engineering before transplantation and The first publication in transplantation pathology, an article about trans- plantation of embryo tissue by Nobel laureate Peyton Rous, appeared in TABLE 1 Solutions to the organ shortage—the hybrid 1910.11 The first Banff allograft pathology meeting was in 1991, repre- 2–6,29,32 model —In the likely future of transplantation all these senting the start of the Banff Classification of Transplant Pathology and elements will contribute to solution of the organ shortage but Banff Consensus Meetings.8–10 Remarkable progress in transplantation eventually regenerative medicine/tissue engineering approaches will become the dominant influence. It is not either or. A and B can and pathology has been made over the past 107 years and particularly the will be combined past 26 years. The creation of a Banff Classification of Tissue Engineering would be an important new development in the Banff Consensus Process. A. Initiatives Optimizing/Improving Allotransplantation as It Is The science of regenerative medicine is arguably older than transplan- Practiced Now tation—a first major textbook was published in 1901 by Nobel Laureate Tolerance induction Thomas Hunt Morgan12 and another by Korshelt on regeneration and Presumed consent transplantation in 1927.13 A major tissue engineering/regenerative medi- Paired exchange cine meeting took place in 1988 with proceedings published in 1989.14,15 Xenotransplantation The history of tissue engineering pathology (TEP) goes back to the Cryonic Preservation 1967 article by Hubacek et al. on reaction to scaffold material.16 The use Improved tissue typing of the term “tissue engineering” began in 1988 with an article by Vacanti 15,17 Desensitization therapy et al. co- authored by pathologist Antonio Perez- Atayde. Pathology Use of HIV and HCV positive donors has been part of tissue engineering from its inception but it makes sense Buying organs to delineate TEP as a distinct area of pathology now that clinical trials are commencing and the number of publications is increasing rapidly. Organ donation after euthanasia Clinical trials of encapsulated islet cells are underway18 and trials B. Initiatives Increasing Organ Supply/Repair Capabilities through Regenerative Medicine/Tissue Engineering—Possible Elimination of with a bioartificial kidney with silicon filter and human cells are slated Rejection as a Consideration to start by the end of 2017.19 The range of clinically useful bioengi- Organ scaffolds neered constructs is very broad and even includes vascular conduits 20 3D printed organs for hemodialysis without cells. Stem cell repair of organs in vivo Ex vivo perfusion with stem cell repair | Practical use of organoids 3 REGENERATIVE MEDICINE—TISSUE ENGINEERING TRANSPLANTATION De novo growing of organs simulating embryogenesis (TET) DEFINED Synthetic scaffolds better than natural ones Better
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Regenerative Medicine
    Growth Factors and Cellular Therapies in Clinical Musculoskeletal Medicine Douglas E. Hemler, M.D. STAR Spine & Sport Golden, CO June 13, 2016 Regenerative Medicine The term Regenerative Medicine was first coined in 1992 by Leland Kaiser1. Depending on the area of specialization, the definition varies. It is an evolving science that focuses on using components from our own bodies and external technologies to restore and rebuild our own tissues without surgery2. Closely related to Regenerative Medicine is a forward looking approach called Translational Medicine or Translational Science3. As applied to Musculoskeletal Regenerative Medicine, Translational Medicine is the application of scientific disciplines including tissue engineers, molecule biologists, researchers, industry and practicing clinicians who merge their science and experience to develop new approaches to healing tendons and joints. Some aspects of the field are highly complex, confined to laboratories and research institutions such as organ regeneration and embryonic stem cell research. Other areas are ready for clinical application. As defined by the European Society for Translational Medicine (EUSTM) it is an interdisciplinary branch of the biomedical field supported by three main pillars: bench side, bedside and community. The bench to bedside model includes transitioning clinical research to community practice using interactive science and data to benefit the community as a whole. Translational Medicine can be as complex as the research into total organ regeneration, total replacement of blood cell systems following cancer chemotherapy, or the scientific and ethical ramifications of embryonic stem cell research.45 Out of these efforts have come a group of therapies that are being applied by forward looking musculoskeletal practices such as STAR Spine and Sport.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine in the African Continent
    Department of Biomedical Sciences Faculty of Science THE FUTURE OF TISSUE ENGINEERING AND REGENERATIVE MEDICINE IN THE AFRICAN CONTINENT • DR KEOLEBOGILE MOTAUNG • TSHWANE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY • DEPARTMENT OF BIOMEDICAL SCIENCES • TSHWANE • SOUTH AFRICA 1 Department of Biomedical Sciences Faculty of Science OUTLINE • Definition of TE and RM • Applications and Benefits • Research work • Challenges • Recommendations to improve gender content and social responsibility of research programmes in Africa that can enhance the effectiveness and sustainability of the development measures needed 2 Department of Biomedical Sciences Faculty of Science QUESTIONS ? How can one create human spare parts that has been damaged? Why do we have to create spare parts? 3 Department of Biomedical Sciences Faculty of Science HOW? TISSUE ENGINEERING AND REGENERATIVE MEDICINE • Is as science of design and manufacture of new tissues for the functional restoration of impaired organs and replacement of lost parts due to cancer, diseases and trauma. • Creation of human spare parts? 4 Department of Biomedical Sciences Faculty of Science WHY? DO WE HAVE TO CREATE HUMAN SPARE PARTS? • Shortage of donor tissues and organs • Survival rates for major organ transplantations are poor despite their high costs and the body's immune system often rejects donated tissue and organs. • Tissue engineering and Regenerative Medicine therefore, has remarkable potential in the medical field to solve these problems 5 Department of Biomedical Sciences Faculty of Science APPLICATIONS:
    [Show full text]
  • Regenerative Medicine Options for Chronic Musculoskeletal Conditions: a Review of the Literature Sean W
    Regenerative Medicine Options for Chronic Musculoskeletal Conditions: A Review of the Literature Sean W. Mulvaney, MD1; Paul Tortland, DO2; Brian Shiple, DO3; Kamisha Curtis, MPH4 1 Associate Professor of Medicine, Uniformed Services expected to be over 67 billion dollars in spending on University, Bethesda, MD biologics and cell therapies by 2020 (1). 2 FAOASM, Associate Clinical Professor of Medicine, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT Specifically, regenerative medicine also stands 3 CAQSM, RMSK, ARDMS; The Center for Sports Medicine & in contrast to treatment modalities that impair Wellness, Glen Mills, PA the body’s ability to facilitate endogenous repair 4 Regenerative and Orthopedic Sports Medicine, Annapolis, MD mechanisms such as anti-inflammatory drugs (2,3); destructive modalities (e.g., radio frequency ablation of nerves, botulinum toxin injections) (4); Abstract and surgical methods that permanently alter the functioning of a joint, including joint fusion, spine egenerative medicine as applied to fixation, and partial or total arthroplasty. When musculoskeletal injuries is a term compared to other allopathic options (including knee used to describe a growing field of R and hip arthroplasty with a 90-day mortality rate of musculoskeletal medicine that concentrates 0.7% in the Western hemisphere) (5), regenerative on evidence-based treatments that focus on medicine treatment modalities have a lower and augment the body’s endogenous repair incidence of adverse events with a growing body of capabilities. These treatments are targeted statistically significant medical literature illustrating at the specific injury site or region of injury both their safety and efficacy (6). by the precise application of autologous, allogeneic or proliferative agents.
    [Show full text]
  • Nanotechnology in Regenerative Medicine: the Materials Side
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by UPCommons. Portal del coneixement obert de la UPC Review Nanotechnology in regenerative medicine: the materials side Elisabeth Engel, Alexandra Michiardi, Melba Navarro, Damien Lacroix and Josep A. Planell Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia (IBEC), Department of Materials Science, Technical University of Catalonia, CIBER BBN, Barcelona, Spain Regenerative medicine is an emerging multidisciplinary structures and materials with nanoscale features that can field that aims to restore, maintain or enhance tissues mimic the natural environment of cells, to promote certain and hence organ functions. Regeneration of tissues can functions, such as cell adhesion, cell mobility and cell be achieved by the combination of living cells, which will differentiation. provide biological functionality, and materials, which act Nanomaterials used in biomedical applications include as scaffolds to support cell proliferation. Mammalian nanoparticles for molecules delivery (drugs, growth fac- cells behave in vivo in response to the biological signals tors, DNA), nanofibres for tissue scaffolds, surface modifi- they receive from the surrounding environment, which is cations of implantable materials or nanodevices, such as structured by nanometre-scaled components. Therefore, biosensors. The combination of these elements within materials used in repairing the human body have to tissue engineering (TE) is an excellent example of the reproduce the correct signals that guide the cells great potential of nanotechnology applied to regenerative towards a desirable behaviour. Nanotechnology is not medicine. The ideal goal of regenerative medicine is the in only an excellent tool to produce material structures that vivo regeneration or, alternatively, the in vitro generation mimic the biological ones but also holds the promise of of a complex functional organ consisting of a scaffold made providing efficient delivery systems.
    [Show full text]
  • BREAKTHROUGHS in BIOSCIENCE/ ADVISORY COMMITTEE REGENERATIVE MEDICINE CHAIR» AUTHOR» Paula H
    / FALL 2016 Regenerative Medicine Advances from the Convergence of Biology & Engineering WHAT'S INSIDE » EXCEPTIONAL REGENERATION IN NATURE 2 / NATURAL REGENERATION IN HUMAN TISSUES 3 TISSUE ENGINEERING 4 / CONSTRUCTING SKIN 7 / TUBULAR ORGANS 8 / BONE ENGINEERING 8 MENDING BROKEN HEARTS 8 / REAWAKENING THE HUMAN HEART 10 / THE ROAD AHEAD 11 BREAKTHROUGHS IN BIOSCIENCE/ ADVISORY COMMITTEE REGENERATIVE MEDICINE CHAIR» AUTHOR» Paula H. Stern, PhD Cathryn M. Delude, of Santa Fe, New Mexico, writes about Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine science and medicine for magazines, newspapers, and COMMITTEE MEMBERS» research institutes. Her articles have appeared in Nature Aditi Bhargava, PhD Outlook, The Journal of the National Cancer Association University of California, San Francisco (JNCI), AACR’s Cancer Discovery, Proto: Dispatches from David L. Brautigan, PhD the Frontiers of Medicine, Los Angeles Times, Boston Globe, University of Virginia School of Medicine New York Times, Scientific American, and The Scientist. She has also written for the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, David B. Burr, PhD Harvard Health Publications, Harvard School of Public Health, Indiana University School of Medicine Massachusetts General Hospital, Massachusetts Institute of Blanche Capel, PhD Technology, Dana Farber Cancer Center, Stowers Institute Duke University Medical Center for Medical Research, and the National Institutes of Health Rao L. Divi, PhD Office of Science Education. This is her fifth article in FASEB’s National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health Breakthroughs in Bioscience series. Marnie Halpern, PhD SCIENTIFIC ADVISOR» Carnegie Institution for Science Henry J. Donahue, PhD is the School of Engineering Foun- dation Professor and Chair of the Department of Biomedical Loraine Oman-Ganes, MD, FRCP(C), CCMG, FACMG Engineering at the Virginia Commonwealth University.
    [Show full text]
  • Regenerative Medicine's Historical Roots in Regeneration, Transplantation, and Translation
    Developmental Biology 358 (2011) 278–284 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Developmental Biology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/developmentalbiology Regenerative medicine's historical roots in regeneration, transplantation, and translation Jane Maienschein Center for Biology and Society, School of Life Sciences 874501, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-4501, United States article info abstract Article history: Regenerative medicine is not new; it has not sprung anew out of stem cell science as has often been Received for publication 4 February 2010 suggested. There is a rich history of study of regeneration, of development, and of the ways in which Revised 12 April 2010 understanding regeneration advances study of development and also has practical and medical applications. Accepted 9 June 2010 This paper explores the history of regenerative medicine, starting especially with T.H. Morgan in 1901 and Available online 16 June 2010 carrying through the history of transplantation research in the 20th century, to an emphasis on translational medicine in the late 20th century. Keywords: Regeneration © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Development Translation Transplantation Regenerative medicine Regenerative medicine, as it has been labeled, typically calls for Yet, current research draws on several different lines of historical regeneration of lost function to address clinical medical problems. A study that have been grounded in different underlying assumptions widely adopted description recorded by the NIH captures several and have benefitted from different techniques and methods. At root different aspects of the research, noting the several goals to replace are studies of regeneration and transplantation, and it is worth lost structures, to regenerate failed functions, and to solve problems in looking more closely at those rich research traditions of the first half of new ways.
    [Show full text]
  • Stem Cell Before:After Therapy Recommendations
    STEM CELL THERAPY BEFORE YOUR PROCEDURE • Patients should discontinue use of all medications listed below. This includes any anti- inflammatories, blood thinners, and other medications as outlined. • There are no restrictions with food or drink before your procedure. • Try to schedule yourself 2 or 3 days of rest after your procedure. • Inform our office of any medication allergies. • General anesthesia is not used during these procedures. Our physicians will use local anesthesia to numb the injection site. • If you have questions or concerns about your procedure, call our office at 770-421-1420 or visit our website: http://lowbackpain.com/services/regenerative-medicine.asp MEDICATION LIST TO DISCONTINUE BEFORE STEM CELL THERAPY Discuss with your primary care doctor before stopping any medications ANTI-INFLAMMATORIES These medications should be discontinued a week prior to your procedure. • NSAIDs (including: Advil, Motrin, Aleve, Voltaren, Mobic, Celebrex) • ASPIRIN • STEROIDS BLOOD THINNERS • Coumadin, Plavix, Xarelto, Pradaxa, Eliquis, Aggrenox In the presence of these medications, stem cells do not flourish, which is why we recommend discontinuing the use of these medications 7 days before your procedure and continuing to stay off these medications 4 weeks after your procedure. Do not discontinue use of these medications unless your primary care doctor approves. • Osteoporosis Medications- Bisphosphonates • Reflux (GERD) Medications- Proton Pump Inhibitors such as Prilosec, Prevacid, Zegerid, Protonix, Nexium, and AcipHex STEM CELL THERAPY AFTER YOUR PROCEDURE • Pain relief will not be immediate. You should expect to feel relief anywhere from 2-4 weeks to a few months after the procedure depending on where the injection was given.
    [Show full text]
  • Nanotechnology Enabled Regenerative Medicine for Neurological Disorders
    Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 148 (2019) 1–2 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/addr Nanotechnology enabled regenerative medicine for neurological disorders Tao L. Lowe a,⁎, Vivek Agrahari b, Rangaramanujam M. Kannan c, Sujatha Kannan d Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Memphis, TN 38163, USA CONRAD, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Arlington, VA 22209, USA Center for Nanomedicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA Regenerative therapy has evolved significantly in recent years with endogenous regenerative pathways in the brain. The authors discuss promising approaches to restore function of diseased, damaged and nanotechnology-based approaches that target cellular and extracellular aged tissues and organs. It is a highly interdisciplinary field that has components to enhance neural regeneration while suppressing cellular been made possible by the intersection of recent advances in bioengi- and extracellular inhibitory mechanisms triggered by injury that could neering, stem cell biology and nanotechnology. Incorporation of nano- impair repair and plasticity in the brain. In the perspective review by technology may allow better control over physicochemical and the Ferriero group [2], the unique challenges in considering advanced biological properties of a biomaterial compared to conventional tech- regenerative therapies in the newborn brain are discussed. Newborn nologies. Nanotechnology applications to regenerative therapy have brains are immature and actively changing due to normal brain devel- all the potential to revolutionize tissue regeneration and repair, and ul- opment.
    [Show full text]
  • Neurosciences ANNUAL REPORT 2021
    2021 NEUROSCIENCES ANNUAL REPORT NEURO 3 WELCOME 4 2020 HIGHLIGHTS 6 ALZHEIMER’S DISEASE AND MEMORY DISORDERS 8 BRAIN TUMORS 10 CSF LEAK 12 EPILEPSY 14 HUMAN BRAIN AND COGNITION RESEARCH 16 MOVEMENT DISORDERS 18 NEUROIMAGING 20 NEUROVASCULAR / STROKE 22 SPINE 24 METRICS 30 EDUCATION AND RECRUITS 31 SELECTED PUBLICATIONS 33 HONORS AND AWARDS 34 REFERRAL RESOURCES AND FACULTY DIRECTORY The images in this report feature photography of foods rich in healthful nutrients like omega-3 fatty acids, B vitamins and antioxidants, which are known to support brain health and cognitive function. They are: purple sweet potato (cover), eggs (p. 2), blueberries (p. 6), tomatoes (p. 9), kale (p. 10), cumin (p. 13), green tea (p. 14), walnuts (p. 17), cauliflower (p. 18), grapes (p. 21), turmeric (p. 22), fish (p. 24) and orange (p. 32). Dear Colleague, We are pleased to share with you our annual report for the Cedars-Sinai Departments of Neurology & Neurosurgery. While the COVID-19 pandemic presented many challenges to caring for our patients, we have continued to make incredible strides in neuroscience research. We have expanded our understanding of the human brain and made significant progress in the diagnosis of neurological disorders, including Alzheimer’s disease, brain tumors, neurovascular and functional disorders, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak and multiple sclerosis (MS). We established the Jona Goldrich Center for Alzheimer’s and Memory Disorders in 2019 to fund research for Alzheimer’s and develop a comprehensive care model for a rapidly growing population at risk for dementia. 2020 marked the inauguration of our Neuroimaging Program, a multidisciplinary effort that will foster work across subspecialties to refine the diagnosis of complex and hard-to-detect neurological diseases, utilizing cutting-edge technology to identify these conditions sooner and with better accuracy.
    [Show full text]
  • Curative Regenerative Medicines: Preparing Health Care Systems for the Coming Wave
    ❚ REGENERATIVE MEDICINE In Vivo Pharma intelligence | Curative Regenerative Medicines: Preparing Health Care Systems For The Coming Wave We may be at the dawn of a new era of curative regenerative therapies, but their inherent nature may create barriers to adoption. The Alliance for Regenerative Medicine frames the opportunities and challenges for the industry, arguing that policy makers must begin to understand 1 the ways that these therapies represent value for money. Shutterstock: Lightspring Shutterstock: BY FARAZ ALI, TED SLOCOMB mily Whitehead was diag- disease go into complete remission. AND MICHAEL WERNER nosed with an aggressive Additional companies using similar form of cancer called acute approaches for other malignancies have More than 700 companies are working lymphoblastic leukemia reported exciting early results, prompting on new gene, cell and tissue (ALL) at the tender age of many to dare speak of a “cure” for cancer. engineering therapies that have the potential for profound and durable E5 in 2010. She had relapsed twice after In fact, when US Vice President Joe Biden responses in patients with a diverse chemotherapy and was out of options called for a “moonshot” effort to “end array of serious and costly conditions, and near death when she was treated cancer as we know it,” he did so fully many of which lack current treatments. with an experimental chimeric antigen aware of the promise of such gene and receptor T cell (CAR-T) gene therapy cell therapies already under development The health care market is grappling at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and rapidly approaching the marketplace. with ways to articulate and assess the (CHOP) that saved her life.
    [Show full text]
  • Nanotechnology in Regenerative Medicine 3.1 Definition
    Nanotechnology in Regenerative Medicine 3.1 Definition...........................................................................................2 3.2 Short Description..................................................................................2 3.3 State of R&D .......................................................................................2 3.3.1 Nanophase Materials ..........................................................................3 3.3.2 Nanocomposite Scaffolds .....................................................................4 3.3.3 Nanofibre Scaffolds............................................................................4 3.3.3.1 Polymers used in Nanofibre Scaffolds................................................6 3.3.4 Bioactive Scaffolds ............................................................................7 3.3.5 Carbon Nanotubes .............................................................................8 3.3.6 Cell Sheet Engineering ........................................................................9 3.3.7 Stem Cells.......................................................................................9 3.3.8 Bioreactors, Biocapsules and Biochips.................................................... 10 3.4 Additional Demand for Research ............................................................. 11 3.5 Applications and Perspectives ................................................................ 12 3.6 References ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Whole-Genome Analysis, Stem Cell Research, and the Future of Biobanks
    Cell Stem Cell Forum Whole-Genome Analysis, Stem Cell Research, and the Future of Biobanks Thane Kreiner1,* and Stefan Irion1 1The Center for Science, Technology, and Society, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, CA 95053 USA *Correspondence: [email protected] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2013.04.024 The convergence of the genomic revolution and biobanking with rapid progress in stem cell research holds vast potential for personalized medicine and novel therapies. In this Forum, we explore social and ethical considerations emerging from strategies to realize the promise of these remarkable technologies. In 2005, one of the first genome-wide as- consequent knowledge could be lever- tion of individual genetic predispositions, sociation studies (GWAS) was published, aged to find new therapeutics and design and information about biological family in which over 116,000 SNPs in 146 indi- smarter clinical trials with inclusion and members who may not have provided viduals were screened to reveal a comple- exclusion criteria tailored to expected re- any type of informed consent (Cambon- ment factor H polymorphism associated sponses based on genetic variation (Bellin Thomsen, 2004; Knoppers et al., 2012). with age-related macular degeneration et al., 2012). Moreover, biobanks of cells Moreover, there is significant variation (Klein et al., 2005). Some 2 years later, with known and defined genetic profiles among informed consent for biobanks: successful reprogramming of human could facilitate development of cell-based specific to a particular study or broad; ob- fibroblasts to induced pluripotent stem therapeutics less prone to immune rejec- ligations, if any, to return results to do- cells (iPSCs) was reported (Takahashi tion.
    [Show full text]