DOCSLIB.ORG

Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center: Annotated Bibliography 1994 – 2004

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center: Annotated Bibliography 1994 – 2004 Compiled by David A. Helweg Report Series OF 2005-1290 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior Gale A. Norton, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey P. Patrick Leahy, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia 2005 Revised and reprinted: 2005 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Suggested citation: Helweg, David A., 2005, Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center: Annotated Bibliography 1994-2004. USGS Report Series OF 2005-1290. For additional copies please contact the author at USGS-PIERC Kilauea Field Station, POB 44, Hawaii National Park, HI 96718. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted material contained within this report. ii Foreword. In 1994, the Pacific Islands Science Center (PISC) was established with the creation of the National Biological Survey (NBS). On October 1, 1996, NBS was transferred by Congress to the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) as the Biological Resources Division. As part of the reorganization, PISC was renamed the Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center (PIERC) to reflect the Center’s increasing emphasis on ecosystem science. The primary responsibility of PIERC is to assist resource managers in the Pacific region by providing them with sound biological information and with assistance in applying the information to their needs. The mandated field of operations for PIERC includes the Hawaiian archipelago plus current U.S. holdings and former Trust Territories in Polynesia and Micronesia. This is an area spanning six time zones, from 30 degrees North to 15 degrees South of the equator, and from 155 degrees East to 130 degrees West across the International Date Line. The mission of PIERC is to work with others to provide scientific understanding and technologies needed to support and implement sound management and conservation of our Nation’s biological resources occurring within cultural, sociological and political contexts of the State of Hawai‘i and other locations in the Pacific Basin affiliated with the United States. PIERC fulfills this mission by 1) investigating biological resource issues faced by Federal and State land managers and providing meaningful information important for management purposes; 2) providing scientific information necessary to effectively intercede in the decline of native biodiversity in this region; and 3) providing the best possible information concerning the nature, structure, condition, evolution, and importance of the biodiversity of the Pacific region. We offer this Annotated Bibliography as an introduction to our research for all those who share our quest for understanding and interest in preserving and restoring native ecosystems in Hawaii and other Pacific islands. Within each section, works are sorted by year and then author. Hawaiian words have been spelled as they were in the original work, and variants provided in square brackets to enhance searchability. A brief summary of each peer-reviewed work has been provided wherever possible. We invite you also to explore the USGS, our Center, and partners through the following websites: ¾ www.usgs.gov/pierc.html ¾ www.hear.org ¾ www.pbin.gov with aloha, William W.M. Steiner, Ph.D. Director, USGS Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center iii Contents Foreword.............................................................................................................................................................................iii Avian Biology / Avian Ecology .........................................................................................................................................1 Peer-Reviewed Journal Articles..................................................................................................................................1 Books, Chapters, and Edited Volumes......................................................................................................................11 Peer-Reviewed Technical Reports ...........................................................................................................................12 Nonreviewed Technical Reports...............................................................................................................................12 Nonreviewed Articles..................................................................................................................................................14 Conference Presentations, Posters, and Abstracts...............................................................................................15 Bioacoustics / Sensory Systems ...................................................................................................................................18 Peer-Reviewed Journal Articles................................................................................................................................18 Books, Chapters, and Edited Volumes......................................................................................................................20 Peer-Reviewed Technical Reports ...........................................................................................................................20 Nonreviewed Technical Reports...............................................................................................................................21 Conference Presentations, Posters, and Abstracts...............................................................................................21 Ecosystem Restoration / Endangered Species Recovery / Best Management Practices .................................23 Peer-Reviewed Journal Articles................................................................................................................................23 Books, Chapters, and Edited Volumes......................................................................................................................25 Peer-Reviewed Technical Reports ...........................................................................................................................25 Nonreviewed Technical Reports...............................................................................................................................26 Nonreviewed Technical Reports...............................................................................................................................26 Nonreviewed Articles..................................................................................................................................................27 Conference Presentations, Posters, and Abstracts...............................................................................................27 General Biology / Behavioral Biology...........................................................................................................................28 Peer-Reviewed Journal Articles................................................................................................................................28 Nonreviewed Technical Reports...............................................................................................................................29 Conference Presentations, Posters, and Abstracts...............................................................................................29 General Botany / Vegetation Ecology...........................................................................................................................29 Peer-Reviewed Journal Articles................................................................................................................................29 Books, Chapters, and Edited Volumes......................................................................................................................30 Conference Presentations, Posters, and Abstracts...............................................................................................30 General Ecology / Climate Change................................................................................................................................31 Peer-Reviewed Journal Articles................................................................................................................................31 Books, Chapters, and Edited Volumes......................................................................................................................31 Peer-Reviewed Technical Reports ...........................................................................................................................32 Conference Presentations, Posters, and Abstracts...............................................................................................32 iv Genetics / Molecular Biology.........................................................................................................................................32 Peer-Reviewed Journal Articles................................................................................................................................32
Recommended publications
  • 'Alae 'Ula (Hawaiian Moorhen)

    'Alae 'Ula (Hawaiian Moorhen)

    NATIVE WATERBIRDS AVIAN NEWCOMERS These newly-created wetlands have been rapidly colonized by native waterbirds, Many non-native birds are attracted to the wetland restoration as well. The including four species that are highly endangered and found only in the Hawaiian long-necked white waders are Cattle Egrets, native to the Old World. Non-native Islands. The ‘Alae ‘Ula, or Hawaiian Moorhen (Gallinula chloropus sandvicensis), songbirds include the Common Myna, White-rumped Shama, two unrelated kinds of and Koloa Maoli, or Koloa Duck (Anas wyvilliana), have by now raised many broods cardinals, and three kinds of doves. Many of these exotic species probably became here, nesting among the native sedges. The Ae‘o, or Hawaiian Stilt (Himantopus established in recent decades as escaped cage birds. Before the accidental mexicanus knudseni), and the Nēnē, or Hawaiian Goose (Branta sandvicensis), stop introduction of mosquitoes in the 19th century and bird diseases they carry, by almost daily to rest and feed. In the morning and evening, watch for the ‘Auku‘u these coastal lowlands were home to native honeycreepers and other native or Black-crowned Night Heron (Nycticorax nycticorax). Long-distance migrants such songbirds, preserved abundantly in the fossil record of Makauwahi Cave. as the Kōlea or Pacific Golden Plover Pluvialis( fulva) stop to rest and often winter here, as part of their annual 10,000-mile migration from breeding grounds in the Arctic to wintering sites in the tropics. Bones of all these bird species occur as fossils in the sediment of adjacent Makauwahi Cave, showing that they have thrived here for thousands of years.
  • On the Taxonomic State of Water Mite Taxa (Acari: Hydrachnidia) Described from the Palaearctic, Part 3, Hygrobatoidea and Arrenuroidea with New Faunistic Data

    On the Taxonomic State of Water Mite Taxa (Acari: Hydrachnidia) Described from the Palaearctic, Part 3, Hygrobatoidea and Arrenuroidea with New Faunistic Data

    Zootaxa 3981 (4): 542–552 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2015 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3981.4.5 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:861CEBBE-5277-4E4C-B3DF-8850BEDD2A23 On the taxonomic state of water mite taxa (Acari: Hydrachnidia) described from the Palaearctic, part 3, Hygrobatoidea and Arrenuroidea with new faunistic data HARRY SMIT1, REINHARD GERECKE2, VLADIMIR PEŠIĆ3 & TERENCE GLEDHILL4 1Naturalis Biodiversity Center, P.O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, the Netherlands. E-mail: [email protected] 2Biesingerstr. 11, 72070 Tübingen, Germany. E-mail: [email protected] 3Department of Biology, University of Montenegro, Cetinjski put b.b., 81000 Podgorica, Montenegro. E-mail: [email protected] 4Freshwater Biological Association, The Ferry House, Far Sawrey, Ambleside, Cumbria LA22 0LP, United Kingdom. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Following revision of material from museum collections and recent field work, new taxonomic and faunistic data are given for several representatives of the water mite superfamilies Hygrobatoidea and Arrenuroidea. Ten new synonyms are established: Family Limnesiidae: Limnesia martianezi Lundblad, 1962 = L. arevaloi arevaloi K. Viets, 1918; Limnesia jaczewskii Biesiadka, 1977 = Limnesia connata Koenike, 1895. Family Hygrobatidae: Hygro- bates properus Láska, 1954 = H. trigonicus Koenike, 1895. Family Unionicolidae: Unionicola finisbelli Ramazzotti, 1947 = U. inusitata Koenike, 1914. Family Pionidae: Tiphys koenikei (Barrois & Moniez, 1887) = Forelia variegator (Koch, 1837); Piona falcigera Koenike, 1905, P. bre h m i Walter, 1910, P. trisetica bituberosa K. Viets, 1930 and P. dentipes Lun- dblad, 1962 = P. alpicola (Neuman, 1880).
  • Water Mites of the Genus Arrenurus (Acari; Hydrachnida) from Europe and North America

    Water Mites of the Genus Arrenurus (Acari; Hydrachnida) from Europe and North America

    Department of Animal Morphology Institute of Environmental Biology Adam Mickiewicz University Mariusz Więcek EFFECTS OF THE EVOLUTION OF INTROMISSION ON COURTSHIP COMPLEXITY AND MALE AND FEMALE MORPHOLOGY: WATER MITES OF THE GENUS ARRENURUS (ACARI; HYDRACHNIDA) FROM EUROPE AND NORTH AMERICA Mentors: Prof. Jacek Dabert – Institute of Environmental Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University Prof. Heather Proctor – Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta POZNAŃ 2015 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost I want to thank my mentor Prof. Jacek Dabert. It has been an honor to be his Ph.D. student. I would like to thank for his assistance and support. I appreciate the time and patience he invested in my research. My mentor, Prof. Heather Proctor, guided me into the field of behavioural biology, and advised on a number of issues during the project. She has been given me support and helped to carry through. I appreciate the time and effort she invested in my research. My research activities would not have happened without Prof. Lubomira Burchardt who allowed me to work in her team. Many thanks to Dr. Peter Martin who introduced me into the world of water mites. His enthusiasm was motivational and supportive, and inspirational discussions contributed to higher standard of my research work. I thank Dr. Mirosława Dabert for introducing me in to techniques of molecular biology. I appreciate Dr. Reinhard Gerecke and Dr. Harry Smit who provided research material for this study. Many thanks to Prof. Bruce Smith for assistance in identification of mites and sharing his expert knowledge in the field of pheromonal communication. I appreciate Dr.
  • Growth Patterns of Hawaiian Stilt Chicks

    Growth Patterns of Hawaiian Stilt Chicks

    Wilson Bull., 11 l(4), 1999, pp. 478487 GROWTH PATTERNS OF HAWAIIAN STILT CHICKS J. MICHAEL REED,,2,8‘ ELIZABETH M. GRAY,334 DIANNE LEWIS3 LEWIS W. ORING,3 RICHARD COLEMAN,5 TIMOTHY BURR,6 AND PETER LUSCOMB7 ABSTRACT-We studied chick growth and plumage patterns in the endangered Hawaiian Stilt (Himantopus mexicanus knudseni). Body mass of captive chicks closely fit a Gompertz growth curve, revealing a growth coefficient (K) of 0.065 day- ’ and point of inflection (T) of 17 days. When chicks fledged about 28 days after hatching, they weighed only 60% of adult body mass; at 42 d, birds still were only 75% of adult mass; culmen, tarsus, and wing chord at fledging also were less than adult size. This trend of continued growth to adult size after fledging is typical for most shorebirds. After hatching, captive chicks grew more rapidly than wild chicks, probably because of an unlimited food supply. We found no evidence for adverse effects of weather on the growth of wild chicks. As with other shorebirds, the tarsus started relatively long, with culmen and then wing chord growing more rapidly in later development. Tarsal and wing chord growth were sigmoidal, whereas culmen growth was linear. We describe plumage characteristics of weekly age classes of chicks to help researchers age birds in the wild. Received 28 Dec. 1998, accepted 20 April 1999. Avian growth patterns have been studied (Himantopus mexicanus knudseni), a precocial primarily because of their relationships to the bird that is an endangered subspecies of the ecology and evolutionary history of different Black-necked Stilt.
  • Pu'u Wa'awa'a Biological Assessment

    Pu'u Wa'awa'a Biological Assessment

    PU‘U WA‘AWA‘A BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT PU‘U WA‘AWA‘A, NORTH KONA, HAWAII Prepared by: Jon G. Giffin Forestry & Wildlife Manager August 2003 STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF FORESTRY AND WILDLIFE TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE ................................................................................................................................. i TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................. ii GENERAL SETTING...................................................................................................................1 Introduction..........................................................................................................................1 Land Use Practices...............................................................................................................1 Geology..................................................................................................................................3 Lava Flows............................................................................................................................5 Lava Tubes ...........................................................................................................................5 Cinder Cones ........................................................................................................................7 Soils .......................................................................................................................................9
  • Downloadable Data Collection

    Downloadable Data Collection

    Smetzer et al. Movement Ecology (2021) 9:36 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40462-021-00275-5 RESEARCH Open Access Individual and seasonal variation in the movement behavior of two tropical nectarivorous birds Jennifer R. Smetzer1* , Kristina L. Paxton1 and Eben H. Paxton2 Abstract Background: Movement of animals directly affects individual fitness, yet fine spatial and temporal resolution movement behavior has been studied in relatively few small species, particularly in the tropics. Nectarivorous Hawaiian honeycreepers are believed to be highly mobile throughout the year, but their fine-scale movement patterns remain unknown. The movement behavior of these crucial pollinators has important implications for forest ecology, and for mortality from avian malaria (Plasmodium relictum), an introduced disease that does not occur in high-elevation forests where Hawaiian honeycreepers primarily breed. Methods: We used an automated radio telemetry network to track the movement of two Hawaiian honeycreeper species, the ʻapapane (Himatione sanguinea) and ʻiʻiwi (Drepanis coccinea). We collected high temporal and spatial resolution data across the annual cycle. We identified movement strategies using a multivariate analysis of movement metrics and assessed seasonal changes in movement behavior. Results: Both species exhibited multiple movement strategies including sedentary, central place foraging, commuting, and nomadism , and these movement strategies occurred simultaneously across the population. We observed a high degree of intraspecific variability at the individual and population level. The timing of the movement strategies corresponded well with regional bloom patterns of ‘ōhi‘a(Metrosideros polymorpha) the primary nectar source for the focal species. Birds made long-distance flights, including multi-day forays outside the tracking array, but exhibited a high degree of fidelity to a core use area, even in the non-breeding period.
  • Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve Management Plan 2011-2016

    Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve Management Plan 2011-2016

    Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve Management Plan 2011-2016 April 1981 Revised, May 1982 2nd revision, April 1983 3rd revision, December 1999 4th revision, May 2011 Prepared for U.S. Department of Commerce Ohio Department of Natural Resources National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Division of Wildlife Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management 2045 Morse Road, Bldg. G Estuarine Reserves Division Columbus, Ohio 1305 East West Highway 43229-6693 Silver Spring, MD 20910 This management plan has been developed in accordance with NOAA regulations, including all provisions for public involvement. It is consistent with the congressional intent of Section 315 of the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended, and the provisions of the Ohio Coastal Management Program. OWC NERR Management Plan, 2011 - 2016 Acknowledgements This management plan was prepared by the staff and Advisory Council of the Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve (OWC NERR), in collaboration with the Ohio Department of Natural Resources-Division of Wildlife. Participants in the planning process included: Manager, Frank Lopez; Research Coordinator, Dr. David Klarer; Coastal Training Program Coordinator, Heather Elmer; Education Coordinator, Ann Keefe; Education Specialist Phoebe Van Zoest; and Office Assistant, Gloria Pasterak. Other Reserve staff including Dick Boyer and Marje Bernhardt contributed their expertise to numerous planning meetings. The Reserve is grateful for the input and recommendations provided by members of the Old Woman Creek NERR Advisory Council. The Reserve is appreciative of the review, guidance, and council of Division of Wildlife Executive Administrator Dave Scott and the mapping expertise of Keith Lott and the late Steve Barry.
  • National Wildlife Refuges Changed2.Pub

    National Wildlife Refuges Changed2.Pub

    TAKE REFUGE Celebrating 100 Years of Threatened and Endangered Species Protection Through the National Wildlife Refuge System TAKE REFUGE Celebrating 100 Years of Threatened and Endangered Species Protection Through the National Wildlife Refuge System The State Public Interest Research Groups U.S. PIRG Education Fund March 2003 Written and designed by: Shannon Ryan, U.S. PIRG Education Fund For more information: Shannon Ryan U.S. Public Interest Research Group Education Fund 218 D Street, SE, Washington, DC 20003 Copies of this report may be ordered by sending a check or money order for $35.00 to: U.S. PIRG, 218 D Street, SE, Washington, DC 20003 The author would like to thank the following people: Alison Cassady and Tiernan Sittenfeld for research and writing assistance; Alicia Supernavage for production assistance; and refuge staff at Sauta Cave NWR, Buenos Aires NWR, Don Edwards San Francisco Bay NWR, Archie Carr NWR, Ash Meadows NWR, Nestucca Bay NWR, Attwater Prairie Chicken NWR, and James River NWR for their time and expertise. Production of this report would not have been possible without funding from: Center for Biological Diversity Defenders of Wildlife National Wildlife Federation Sierra Club PHOTOGRAPHY CREDITS: Pages 11 & 12: Turtle tracks, Archie Carr NWR (background), Friends of the Carr Refuge. Cover & Back Cover: Lange’s metalmark butterfly, USFWS/David Wright; salt marsh bird’s beak, ©Thomas Oberbauer; sandhill crane, USFWS/D.D. Iwurst; Pages 13 & 14: Crystal Spring, Ash Meadows NWR (background), The Mason Neck NWR (background), Mason Neck Canoe and Kayak. American Southwest. Acknowledgements & Table of Contents: Balcones Canyonlands NWR Pages 15 & 16: Nestucca Bay NWR (background), USFWS/David Pitkin.
  • Synonymies for Indigenous Hawaiian Bird Taxa

    Synonymies for Indigenous Hawaiian Bird Taxa

    Part 2 - Drepaninines Click here for Part 1 - Non-Drepaninines The Birds of the Hawaiian Islands: Occurrence, History, Distribution, and Status Version 2 - 1 January 2017 Robert L. Pyle and Peter Pyle Synonymies for Indigenous Hawaiian Bird Taxa Intensive ornithological surveying by active collectors during the latter 1890s led to several classic publications at the turn of the century, each covering nearly all species and island forms of native Hawaiian birds (Wilson and Evans 1899, Rothschild (1900),schild 1900, Bryan 1901a, Henshaw (1902a), 1902a, Perkins (1903),1903). The related but diverse scientific names appearing in these publications comprised the basis for scientific nomenclature for the next half century, but in many cases were modified by later authors using modern techniques to reach a current nomenclature provided in the American Ornithologists’ Union (AOU) Check-List, and followed (for the most part) at this site. A few current AOU names are still controversial, and more changes will come in the future. Synonymies reflecting the history of taxonomic nomenclature are listed below for all endemic birds in the Hawaiian Islands. The heading for each taxon represents that used in this book, reflecting the name used by the AOU (1998), as changed in subsequent AOU Supplements, or, in a few cases, as modified here based on more recent work or on differing opinions on taxonomic ranking. Previously recognized names are listed and citations included for classic publications on taxonomy of Hawaiian birds, as well as significant papers that influenced the species nomenclature. We thank Storrs Olson for sharing with us his summarization on the taxonomy and naming of indigenous Hawaiian birds.
  • Non-Native Trees Provide Habitat for Native Hawaiian Forest Birds

    Non-Native Trees Provide Habitat for Native Hawaiian Forest Birds

    NON-NATIVE TREES PROVIDE HABITAT FOR NATIVE HAWAIIAN FOREST BIRDS By Peter J. Motyka A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science In Biology Northern Arizona University December 2016 Approved: Jeffrey T. Foster, Ph.D., Co-chair Tad C. Theimer, Ph. D., Co-chair Carol L. Chambers, Ph. D. ABSTRACT NON-NATIVE TREES PROVIDE HABITAT FOR NATIVE HAWAIIAN FOREST BIRDS PETER J. MOTYKA On the Hawaiian island of Maui, native forest birds occupy an area dominated by non- native plants that offers refuge from climate-limited diseases that threaten the birds’ persistence. This study documented the status of the bird populations and their ecology in this novel habitat. Using point-transect distance sampling, I surveyed for birds over five periods in 2013-2014 at 123 stations across the 20 km² Kula Forest Reserve (KFR). I documented abundance and densities for four native bird species: Maui ‘alauahio (Paroreomyza montana), ʻiʻiwi (Drepanis coccinea), ʻapapane (Himatione sanguinea), and Hawaiʻi ʻamakihi, (Chlorodrepanis virens), and three introduced bird species: Japanese white-eye (Zosterops japonicas), red-billed leiothrix (Leiothrix lutea), and house finch (Haemorhous mexicanus). I found that 1) native forest birds were as abundant as non-natives, 2) densities of native forest birds in the KFR were similar to those found in native forests, 3) native forest birds showed varying dependence on the structure of the habitats, with ʻiʻiwi and ‘alauahio densities 20 and 30 times greater in forest than in scrub, 4) Maui ‘alauahio foraged most often in non-native cape wattle, eucalyptus, and tropical ash, and nested most often in non-native Monterey cypress, Monterey pine, and eucalyptus.
  • United States of America

    United States of America

    anran Forestry Department Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations GLOBAL FOREST RESOURCES ASSESSMENT COUNTRY REPORTS NITED TATES OF MERICA U S A FRA2005/040 Rome, 2005 FRA 2005 – Country Report 040 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA The Forest Resources Assessment Programme Sustainably managed forests have multiple environmental and socio-economic functions important at the global, national and local scales, and play a vital part in sustainable development. Reliable and up- to-date information on the state of forest resources - not only on area and area change, but also on such variables as growing stock, wood and non-wood products, carbon, protected areas, use of forests for recreation and other services, biological diversity and forests’ contribution to national economies - is crucial to support decision-making for policies and programmes in forestry and sustainable development at all levels. FAO, at the request of its member countries, regularly monitors the world’s forests and their management and uses through the Forest Resources Assessment Programme. This country report forms part of the Global Forest Resources Assessment 2005 (FRA 2005), which is the most comprehensive assessment to date. More than 800 people have been involved, including 172 national correspondents and their colleagues, an Advisory Group, international experts, FAO staff, consultants and volunteers. Information has been collated from 229 countries and territories for three points in time: 1990, 2000 and 2005. The reporting framework for FRA 2005 is based on the thematic elements of sustainable forest management acknowledged in intergovernmental forest-related fora and includes more than 40 variables related to the extent, condition, uses and values of forest resources.
  • <I>Kuehneola Warburgiana</I>

    <I>Kuehneola Warburgiana</I>

    ISSN (print) 0093-4666 © 2012. Mycotaxon, Ltd. ISSN (online) 2154-8889 MYCOTAXON http://dx.doi.org/10.5248/121.207 Volume 121, pp. 207–213 July–September 2012 Kuehneola warburgiana comb. nov. (Phragmidiaceae, Pucciniales), causing witches’ brooms on Rosa bracteata Yoshitaka Ono Faculty of Education, Ibaraki University, 2-1-1 Bunkyo, Mito, Ibaraki 310-8512 Japan Correspondence to: [email protected] Abstract—Caeomatoid rust infection has been observed on Rosa bracteata plants at a single site in Ishigaki Island, Okinawa, Japan, since 1995. The fungus (not previously known in Japan) was identified as Caeoma warburgiana by its characteristic systemic infection causing witches’ brooms and its spore morphology. Uredinial and telial sori were found on the leaves of the witches’ brooms of the infected rose plants at the same site in 2009. The urediniospores were pedicellate and echinulate. The teliospores were composed of two to four linearly arranged, thin-walled cells on a short pedicel. Caeoma-type aecia, Uredo-type uredinia and pedicellate teliospores with two to four linearly arranged cells are characteristic of the genus Kuehneola. Identical telia and teliospores were found in the lectotype of C. warburgiana. Caeoma warburgiana is recombined as Kuehneola warburgiana. Key words —Asia, life cycle, nomenclature, taxonomy Introduction Rosa bracteata is an evergreen perennial shrub, native of southern regions of China, growing in mixed forests, scrub, and sandy hills at low altitudes and seashores (Wu & Raven 2003). The plants also occur at coastal areas of Taiwan and adjacent islands of south Japan (Satake et al. 1989, Liu et al. 2000, Wu & Raven 2003).