DOCSLIB.ORG

Factors That Influence the Implementation of the Lean 5S Tool Within U.S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Factors That Influence the Implementation of the Lean 5S Tool Within U.S Eastern Michigan University DigitalCommons@EMU Master's Theses, and Doctoral Dissertations, and Master's Theses and Doctoral Dissertations Graduate Capstone Projects 5-10-2015 Factors that influence the implementation of the lean 5S tool within U.S. automotive suppliers Randy R. Kazmierski Follow this and additional works at: http://commons.emich.edu/theses Part of the Technology and Innovation Commons Recommended Citation Kazmierski, Randy R., "Factors that influence the implementation of the lean 5S tool within U.S. automotive suppliers" (2015). Master's Theses and Doctoral Dissertations. 621. http://commons.emich.edu/theses/621 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Master's Theses, and Doctoral Dissertations, and Graduate Capstone Projects at DigitalCommons@EMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses and Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@EMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Factors that Influence the Implementation of the Lean 5S Tool within U.S. Automotive Suppliers by Randy R. Kazmierski Research Dissertation Submitted to the College of Technology Eastern Michigan University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN TECHNOLOGY Concentration in Engineering Management Dissertation Committee: John Dugger, Ph.D., Dissertation Chair Alphonso Bellamy, Ph.D., Research Methods Representative Denise Pilato, Ph.D. Michael McVey, Ed.D. May 10, 2015 Ypsilanti, Michigan Abstract This study identified a number of key factors influencing the implementation of each of the phases of the lean 5S tool in suppliers to the U.S. automotive industry and to determine if these factors vary according to selected demographic variables. This study was conceived to develop a better understanding as to why some organizations fail to implement all five of the 5S phases and become stagnant. The research questions that guided the study included: RQ1: What factors were perceived by the respondents to have influenced the implementation of the lean 5S phases and elements in suppliers of manufacturing products to the U.S. automotive industry? RQ2: What is the relationship of the selected demographic variables on the perceived factors and the lean 5S phases in suppliers of manufactured products to the U.S. automotive industry? Active members of the American Society for Quality (ASQ) who have leadership functions within U.S. based automotive industry suppliers constituted the population for this study. An electronic survey questionnaire was developed and administered to active members who have leadership responsibilities within U.S. manufacturing suppliers and belonged to selected ASQ sections from the states of Michigan, Indiana, Ohio and Kentucky. The findings for research question 1 revealed that there is a strong relationship between all factors, elements and phases, and therefore all nine factors were perceived by the respondents to have an impact on the implementation of the lean 5S phases. The findings for research question 2 revealed that seven of the ten selected demographic variables affected each factor and each lean 5S phase. The results of the study provide a series of steps that i when followed can increase the likelihood of 5S implementation success within suppliers to the U.S. automotive industry. Suggestions for future research include: Develop a quasi-experimental study that can address cause and effect relationships for selected factors. A future study could be directed toward a comparison of an organization that has successfully implemented all of the 5S phases to one that has failed to determine what causes resulted in success or failure. A recommendation for future research is to develop a qualitative study to better understand the conditions that influence significant differences in respondents from different states that operate within the same automotive business. A recommendation for future research is to study suppliers of manufactured products to non-automotive organizations to determine if any similarities exist. Additionally, a recommendation for future research is to study the lean 5S implementation by suppliers to the service industries such as academia, medical services and entertainment. Another recommendation for future research is to study group dynamics such as the behavioral differentiation and the integration process of achieving unity of groups toward a common goal. ii Dedication To my wife, Ann; daughter Stacey; and son David, for their love, understanding and support iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my sincere gratitude to Dr. Dugger, chair of my dissertation committee, for his professional support, guidance, encouragement, and valuable input throughout the dissertation process. I would also like to thank the other dissertation committee members: Dr. Pilato, Dr. McVey, Dr. Bellamy and Dr. Fields for their valuable advice, support, and feedback throughout this process. I am grateful to all faculty members at the College of Technology who taught me during the Ph.D. program. I am also grateful to all of the participants who completed my survey and made this study possible. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract ...................................................................................................................................... i Dedication ................................................................................................................................ iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ..................................................................................................... iv TABLE OF CONTENTS .......................................................................................................... v LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................. viii LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................................. x Chapter 1: Introduction and Background .................................................................................. 1 Statement of the Problem ...................................................................................................... 6 Elements of Lean ................................................................................................................... 6 Lean 5S Tool ......................................................................................................................... 8 Rationale for the Study .......................................................................................................... 9 Purpose of the Research ...................................................................................................... 13 Research Questions ............................................................................................................. 13 Assumptions ........................................................................................................................ 14 Definitions of Terms ........................................................................................................... 14 Summary ............................................................................................................................. 16 Chapter 2: Review of the Literature ........................................................................................ 17 U.S. Manufacturing ............................................................................................................. 17 U.S. Manufacturing Trends ................................................................................................. 19 Automotive Manufacturing Industry ................................................................................... 22 Automotive Industry Suppliers ........................................................................................... 27 Quality-Improvement Leaders ............................................................................................ 28 Continuous Improvement Systems...................................................................................... 34 Continuous Improvement Tools .......................................................................................... 38 v Lean Systems....................................................................................................................... 39 Impacts of Lean Systems on Manufacturing ....................................................................... 41 Lean System Tools .............................................................................................................. 44 Lean 5S Tool ....................................................................................................................... 50 Summary ............................................................................................................................. 59 Chapter 3: Methods ............................................................................................................. 61 Research Methods ............................................................................................................... 61 Population and Sample ........................................................................................................ 62 Instrument Development ..................................................................................................... 62 Concept Identification.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Extension of the Lean 5S Methodology to 6S with an Additional Layer to Ensure Occupational Safety and Health Levels
    sustainability Article Extension of the Lean 5S Methodology to 6S with An Additional Layer to Ensure Occupational Safety and Health Levels Mariano Jiménez 1,2 , Luis Romero 2,* , Jon Fernández 2, María del Mar Espinosa 2 and Manuel Domínguez 2 1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Technical School of Engineering—ICAI, Comillas Pontifical University, 25, 28015 Madrid, Spain 2 Design Engineering Area, Industrial Engineering School, National Distance Education University (UNED), 38, 28015 Madrid, Spain * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 12 June 2019; Accepted: 11 July 2019; Published: 12 July 2019 Abstract: This paper proposes an expansion of the Lean 5S methodology, which includes the concept of Safety–Security as 6S. Implementation was done by a standardized process tested in a pilot area that is part of the Integrated Industrial Manufacturing System Laboratory at the Higher Technical School of Engineering (ICAI). The additional 6S phase (Safety-Security) thoroughly reviews all areas of an industrial plant by analyzing the risks at each workstation, which let employees be fitted out with protection resources depending on each of their personal characteristics and to guarantee the safety of the workstation by strictly complying with occupational safety and health and machinery use standards, which must hold a CE certificate of compliance. The main objective was to increase the scope of 5S methodology to respond to the occupational safety and health needs for machines required in optimizing production processes. It is important to remember that companies must guarantee that their employees use personal protection equipment (PPE) at their work posts or stations that protect them properly from risks to their health and safety and that cannot be prevented or sufficiently limited by using collective means of protection or by adopting work organization measures.
    [Show full text]
  • Waste Measurement Techniques for Lean Companies
    WASTE MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES FOR LEAN COMPANIES Maciej Pieńkowski PhD student Wrocław University of Economics Komandorska 118/120, Wrocław, Poland [email protected] A B S T R A C T K E Y W O R D S Waste measurement, The paper is dedicated to answer the problem of lean manufacturing, lean metrics measuring waste in companies, which are implementing Lean Manufacturing concept. Lack of complex identification, quantification an visualization of A R T I C L E I N F O waste significantly impedes Lean transformation Received 07 June 2014 Accepted 17 June 2014 efforts. This problem can be solved by a careful Available online1 December 2014 investigation of Muda, Muri and Mura, which represent the essence of waste in the Toyota Production System. Measuring them facilitates complete and permanent elimination of waste in processes. The paper introduces a suggestion of methodology, which should enable company to quantify and visualize waste at a shop floor level. 1. Introduction Lean Management, originated from the Toyota Production System, is nowadays one of the most dominating management philosophies, both in industrial and service environment. One of the reasons for such a success is its simplicity. The whole concept is based on a common sense idea of so called “waste”. Removing it is the very essence of Lean Management. Despite seemingly simple principles, eliminating waste is not an easy task. Many companies, even those with many years of Lean experience, still struggle to clear the waste out of their processes. It turns out, that the most difficult part is not removing waste itself, but identifying and highlighting it, which should precede the process of elimination.
    [Show full text]
  • Review on Implementation 5S System in Educational
    REVIEW ON IMPLEMENTATION 5S SYSTEM IN EDUCATIONAL LABORATORIES L.Ramanathan1, S.Jeevanantham2, D.Logu3, V.Purushothaman4 1Assistant Professor, 2,3,4UG Scholar, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sri Ramakrishna Engineering College, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India ABSTRACT educational laboratory. Using 5S, the The purpose of this review paper is to laboratory was expected to improve in the study the significance of imple menting areas of working environment, safety, s ome of principles of the 5s and kaizen to reduction of equipment search time, and enhance the productivity of increase deficiency. manufacturing organizations to become Educational laboratories that provide more efficient and more productive. 5s is students with experiential learning that a basic tool of lean manufacturing systems create knowledge through insights gained by which is used for sorting, organizing and practical experience has become an integral systemizing the necessary things for job part of undergraduate STEM education place enhance ment. The research findings (Reck, 2016). Universities and technical from the literature review shows that the colleges aim to close the gap between theory industries have developed the necessity of and industrial practice using educational imple menting the 5s in the job shop and laboratories. These laboratories have according to them, implementing the 5s is technical resources and comparable relatively possible. Moreover, the functional characteristics with industrial educational institute’s labs has been a facilities (Jimenez et. al., 2015). They platform whe re 5s can also be prepare students with the skills required to imple mented. It is also to make the work in a professional environment (Gibbins student teachers become aware of & Perkin, 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • The Toyota Way
    The Toyota Way The Toyota Way is a set of principles and behaviors that underlie the Toyota Motor Corporation's managerial approach and production system. Toyota first summed up its philosophy, values and manufacturing ideals in 2001, calling it “The Toyota Way 2001.” It consists of principles in two key areas: continuous improvement, and respect for people.[1][2][3] Contents [hide] 1 Overview of the principles 2 Research findings o 2.1 Long-term philosophy o 2.2 Right process will produce right results o 2.3 Value to organization by developing people o 2.4 Solving root problems drives organizational learning 3 Translating the principles 4 See also 5 References 6 Further reading Overview of the principles The two focal points of the principles are continuous improvement and respect for people. The principles for a continuous improvement include establishing a long-term vision, working on challenges, continual innovation, and going to the source of the issue or problem. The principles relating to respect for people include ways of building respect and teamwork. Research findings In 2004, Dr. Jeffrey Liker, a University of Michigan professor of industrial engineering, published "The Toyota Way." In his book Liker calls the Toyota Way, "a system designed to provide the tools for people to continually improve their work."[4] The system can be summarized in 14 principles.[5] According to Liker, the 14 principles of The Toyota Way are organized in four sections: (1) long-term philosophy, (2) the right process will produce the right results, (3) add value to the organization by developing your people, and (4) continuously solving root problems drives organizational learning.
    [Show full text]
  • Toyota Production System Toyota Production System
    SNS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AN AUTONOMOUS INSTITUTION Kurumbapalayam (Po), Coimbatore – 641 107 Accredited by NBA – AICTE and Accredited by NAAC – UGC with ‘A’ Grade Approved by AICTE, New Delhi & Affiliated to Anna University, Chennai TOYOTA PRODUCTION SYSTEM 1 www.a2zmba.com Vision Contribute to Indian industry and economy through technology transfer, human resource development and vehicles that meet global standards at competitive price. Contribute to the well-being and stability of team members. Contribute to the overall growth for our business associates and the automobile industry. 2 www.a2zmba.com Mission Our mission is to design, manufacture and market automobiles in India and overseas while maintaining the high quality that meets global Toyota quality standards, to offer superior value and excellent after-sales service. We are dedicated to providing the highest possible level of value to customers, team members, communities and investors in India. www.a2zmba.com 3 7 Principles of Toyota Production System Reduced setup time Small-lot production Employee Involvement and Empowerment Quality at the source Equipment maintenance Pull Production Supplier involvement www.a2zmba.com 4 Production System www.a2zmba.com 5 JUST-IN-TIME Produced according to what needed, when needed and how much needed. Strategy to improve return on investment by reducing inventory and associated cost. The process is driven by Kanban concept. www.a2zmba.com 6 KANBAN CONCEPT Meaning- Sign, Index Card It is the most important Japanese concept opted by Toyota. Kanban systems combined with unique scheduling tools, dramatically reduces inventory levels. Enhances supplier/customer relationships and improves the accuracy of manufacturing schedules. A signal is sent to produce and deliver a new shipment when material is consumed.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Lean Terminology
    Glossary of Lean Terminology Lean Term Definition Use 6S: Used for improving organization of the Create a safe and workplace, the name comes from the six organized work area steps required to implement and the words (each starting with S) used to describe each step: sort, set in order, scrub, safety, standardize, and sustain. A3 thinking: Forces consensus building; unifies culture TPOC, VSA, RIE, around a simple, systematic problem solving methodology; also becomes a communication tool that follows a logical narrative and builds over years as organization learning; A3 = metric nomenclature for a paper size equal to 11”x17” Affinity A process to organize disparate language Problem solving, Diagram: info by placing it on cards and grouping brainstorming the cards that go together in a creative way. “header” cards are then used to summarize each group of cards Andon: A device that calls attention to defects, Visual management tool equipment abnormalities, other problems, or reports the status and needs of a system typically by means of lights – red light for failure mode, amber light to show marginal performance, and a green light for normal operation mode. Annual In Policy Deployment, those current year Strategic focus Objectives: objectives that will allow you to reach your 3-5 year breakthrough objectives Autonomation: Described as "intelligent automation" or On-demand, defect free "automation with a human touch.” If an abnormal situation arises the machine stops and the worker will stop the production line. Prevents the production of defective products, eliminates overproduction and focuses attention on understanding the problem and ensuring that it never recurs.
    [Show full text]
  • Lean Manufacturing Techniques for Textile Industry Copyright © International Labour Organization 2017
    Lean Manufacturing Techniques For Textile Industry Copyright © International Labour Organization 2017 First published (2017) Publications of the International Labour Office enjoy copyright under Protocol 2 of the Universal Copyright Convention. Nevertheless, short excerpts from them may be reproduced without authorization, on condition that the source is indicated. For rights of reproduction or translation, application should be made to ILO Publications (Rights and Licensing), International Labour Office, CH-1211 Geneva 22, Switzerland, or by email: [email protected]. The International Labour Office welcomes such applications. Libraries, institutions and other users registered with a reproduction rights organization may make copies in accordance with the licences issued to them for this purpose. Visit www.ifrro.org to find the reproduction rights organization in your country. ILO Cataloging in Publication Data/ Lean Manufacturing Techniques for Textile Industry ILO Decent Work Team for North Africa and Country Office for Egypt and Eritrea- Cairo: ILO, 2017. ISBN: 978-92-2-130764-8 (print), 978-92-2-130765-5 (web pdf) The designations employed in ILO publications, which are in conformity with United Nations practice, and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the International Labour Office concerning the legal status of any country, area or territory or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers. The responsibility for opinions expressed in signed articles, studies and other contributions rests solely with their authors, and publication does not constitute an endorsement by the International Labour Office of the opinions expressed in them. Reference to names of firms and commercial products and processes does not imply their endorsement by the International Labour Office, and any failure to mention a particular firm, commercial product or process is not a sign of disapproval.
    [Show full text]
  • Using PDCA Cycle to Improve the Process of Supplying Cooling Hydrogen for a Combined Cycle Generator at Rabigh Power Plant
    Using PDCA Cycle to Improve the process of Supplying Cooling Hydrogen for a Combined Cycle Generator at Rabigh Power Plant Engineer, Waleed Basheer Alsaadi Saudi Electricity Company, Generation Sector, Rabigh Power Plant, Engineering Department, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia E-mail: [email protected] Prof, Hani Alamri Faculty of Economics & Administration, King Abdul-Aziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Organizations seek to improve their performance by reducing costs and increasing profits to stay in the market and increase competitiveness. Optimal allocation of available resources helps organizations make optimal decisions in customization, minimizes costs and improves performance. This project aims to utilized Kaizen continuous improvement method within the power generation industry. Rabigh Power Plant, as many other generation stations, has ongoing effort to improve daily work activities. The project highlights the experience of using continuous improvement methodology to incrementally increase plant performance, achieve economic savings, and maintain the continuity of electricity flow. The study applied Kaizen methodology to improve the procedure of supplying hydrogen cooling gas to the third combined cycle‟s (CC3) generator at the fourth stage of Rabigh Power Plant. The study recommends to re-engineering the existing system to utilize stage one‟s hydrogen generation plant. The finding shows that re- engineering the system will improve the process cycle by around 98% and reduce the number of tasks by 86%. Keyword: Kaizen; PDCA Cycle; Total Quality; Continuous Improvement Process (CIP), Saudi Arabia; Power Plant; Hydrogen Cooling System; Resources Optimal allocation. ملخص البحث : حسؼً انمىظماث إنً ححسيه أدائها مه خﻻل خفض انخكانيف وصيادة اﻷسباح نهبماء في انسىق وصيادة انمذسة انخىافسيت.
    [Show full text]
  • Lean Manufacturing
    8 Lean manufacturing Lean manufacturing, lean enterprise, or lean production, often simply, "Lean", is a production practice that considers the expenditure of resources for any goal other than the creation of value for the end customer to be wasteful, and thus a target for elimination. Working from the perspective of the customer who consumes a product or service, "value" is defined as any action or process that a customer would be willing to pay for. Essentially, lean is centered on preserving value with less work. Lean manufacturing is a management philosophy derived mostly from the Toyota Production System (TPS) (hence the term Toyotism is also prevalent) and identified as "Lean" only in the 1990s. TPS is renowned for its focus on reduction of the original Toyota seven wastes to improve overall customer value, but there are varying perspectives on how this is best achieved. The steady growth of Toyota, from a small company to the world's largest automaker, has focused attention on how it has achieved this success. 8.1 Overview Lean principles are derived from the Japanese manufacturing industry. The term was first coined by John Krafcik in his 1988 article, "Triumph of the Lean Production System," based on his master's thesis at the MIT Sloan School of Management. Krafcik had been a quality engineer in the Toyota-GM NUMMI joint venture in California before coming to MIT for MBA studies. Krafcik's research was continued by the International Motor Vehicle Program (IMVP) at MIT, which produced the international best-seller book co-authored by Jim Womack, Daniel Jones, and Daniel Roos called The Machine That Changed the World.] A complete historical account of the IMVP and how the term "lean" was coined is given by Holweg (2007).
    [Show full text]
  • Apply Lean Thinking in Project Management
    Chi Pham Ngoc Lan Apply Lean Thinking in Project Management Helsinki Metropolia University of Applied Sciences Bachelor of Engineering Media Engineering Thesis 21 April 2015 Abstract Author(s) Chi Pham Ngoc Lan Title Apply Lean thinking in project management Number of Pages 47 pages + 3 appendices Date 5 May 2010 Degree Bachelor of Engineering Degree Programme Media Engineering Specialisation option Audio Visual Technology, Quality Management Instructor(s) Aarne Klemetti, Senior Lecturer The purpose of this thesis was to study the effects of Lean Thinking in Project Manage- ment and how applying Lean Project Management could enhance the productivity of pro- ject work. The study was carried using theoretical research and collecting empirical data from three interviews and one case study at a local company. At the end of the study, the major project management problems at the company were identified and analyzed following Lean Principles. It was also pointed out where there is a need to adjust and modify Lean Thinking in order to efficiently apply it in project work. The case study also demonstrates the intinital effects of using Lean tools in more dynamic en- vironment as marketing projects. The results of this study show how using Lean principles can solve problems in project management activities, demonstrate the potential and suggest a suitable approach to ap- plying Lean Thinking in business. Keywords project management, Lean thinking, Lean principles, Kan- ban, waste, Mura, Muri, Muda Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Methodology 3 2.1
    [Show full text]
  • Lean Manufacturing and Lean Software Development
    7. Lean manufacturing and Lean software development Lean software development Lean software development (LSD) is a translation of lean manufacturing and lean IT principles and practices to the software development domain. Adapted from the Toyota Production System, a pro-lean subculture is emerging from within the Agile community. Eliminate waste Lean philosophy regards everything not adding value to the customer as waste (muda). Such waste may include: unnecessary code and functionality delay in the software development process unclear requirements insufficient testing (leading to avoidable process repetition) bureaucracy slow internal communication In order to eliminate waste, one should be able to recognize it. If some activity could be bypassed or the result could be achieved without it, it is waste. Partially done coding eventually abandoned during the development process is waste. Extra processes and features not often used by customers are waste. Waiting for other activities, teams, processes is waste. Defects and lower quality are waste. Managerial overhead not producing real value is waste. A value stream mapping technique is used to identify waste. The second step is to point out sources of waste and to eliminate them. Waste-removal should take place iteratively until even essential-seeming processes and procedures are liquidated. Amplify learning Software development is a continuous learning process with the additional challenge of development teams and end product sizes. The best approach for 1 improving a software development environment is to amplify learning. The accumulation of defects should be prevented by running tests as soon as the code is written. Instead of adding more documentation or detailed planning, different ideas could be tried by writing code and building.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Machine Changeover/Setup Times by Increasing U.S
    Walden University ScholarWorks Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Collection 2016 Improving Machine Changeover/Setup Times by Increasing U.S. Manufacturers' Knowledge of 5S Nicole Schra-Martin Walden University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations Part of the Business Administration, Management, and Operations Commons, Industrial Engineering Commons, and the Management Sciences and Quantitative Methods Commons This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Collection at ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Walden University College of Management and Technology This is to certify that the doctoral dissertation by Nicole Schra-Martin has been found to be complete and satisfactory in all respects, and that any and all revisions required by the review committee have been made. Review Committee Dr. Steven Tippins, Committee Chairperson, Applied Management and Decision Sciences Faculty Dr. Lilburn Hoehn, Committee Member, Applied Management and Decision Sciences Faculty Dr. Nikunja Swain, University Reviewer Applied Management and Decision Sciences Faculty Chief Academic Officer Eric Riedel, Ph.D. Walden University 2016 Abstract Improving Machine Changeover/Setup Times by Increasing U.S. Manufacturers’ Knowledge of 5S by Nicole L. Schra-Martin MS, Colorado Technical University, 2005 BS, Oregon Institute of Technology, 2001 BS, Oregon Institute of Technology, 1996 Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Management Walden University August 2016 Abstract The 5S process is one of the techniques born out of Japanese manufacturing.
    [Show full text]