DOCSLIB.ORG

Meeting Record Template

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Meeting Record Template NOTE TO FILE JBA Project Code 2016s5367 Contract Lancaster City Council Level 1 SFRA Client Lancaster City Council Day, Date and Time 5 June 2017 Author Tasmin Fletcher Subject Functional Floodplain Delineation 1 Functional Floodplain Definition 1.1 Flood Risk and Coastal Change PPG – Table 1, Paragraph 065 These Flood Zones refer to the probability of river and sea flooding, ignoring the presence of defences. They are shown on the Environment Agency’s Flood Map for Planning (Rivers and Sea), available on the Environment Agency’s web site, as indicated in the table below. Flood Zone Definition Zone 1 Land having a less than 1 in 1,000 (0.1%) annual probability of river or sea flooding. Low (Shown as ‘clear’ on the Flood Map – all land outside Zones 2 and 3) Probability Zone 2 Land having between a 1 in 100 (1%) and 1 in 1,000 annual probability of river Medium flooding; or Probability Land having between a 1 in 200 (0.5%) and 1 in 1,000 annual probability of sea flooding. (Land shown in light blue on the Flood Map) Zone 3a Land having a 1 in 100 or greater annual probability of river flooding; or High Land having a 1 in 200 or greater annual probability of sea flooding. Probability (Land shown in dark blue on the Flood Map) Zone 3b This zone comprises land where water has to flow or be stored in times of flood. The Local planning authorities should identify in their Strategic Flood Risk Assessments Functional areas of functional floodplain and its boundaries accordingly, in agreement with the Floodplain Environment Agency. (Not separately distinguished from Zone 3a on the Flood Map) Note: The Flood Zones shown on the Environment Agency’s Flood Map for Planning (Rivers and Sea) do not take account of the possible impacts of climate change and consequent changes in the future probability of flooding. Reference should therefore also be made to the Strategic Flood Risk Assessment when considering location and potential future flood risks to developments and land uses. 1.2 Flood Risk and Coastal Change PPG – Paragraph 015 The definition of Flood Zone 3b in Table 1 explains that local planning authorities should identify areas of functional floodplain in their Strategic Flood Risk Assessments in discussion with the Environment Agency and the lead local flood authority. The identification of functional floodplain should take account of local circumstances and not be defined solely on rigid probability parameters. However, land which would naturally flood with an annual probability of 1 in 20 (5%) or greater in any year, or is designed to flood (such as a flood attenuation scheme) in an extreme (0.1% annual probability) flood, should provide a starting point for consideration and discussions to identify the functional floodplain. A functional floodplain is a very important planning tool in making space for flood waters when flooding occurs. Generally, development should be directed away from these areas using the Environment Agency’s www.jbaconsulting.com www.jbarisk.com Page 1 of 5 www.jbaenergy.com NOTE TO FILE JBA Project Code 2016s5367 Contract Lancaster City Council Level 1 SFRA Client Lancaster City Council Day, Date and Time 5 June 2017 Author Tasmin Fletcher Subject Functional Floodplain Delineation catchment flood management plans, shoreline management plans and local flood risk management strategies produced by lead local flood authorities. The area identified as functional floodplain should take into account the effects of defences and other flood risk management infrastructure. Areas which would naturally flood, but which are prevented from doing so by existing defences and infrastructure or solid buildings, will not normally be identified as functional floodplain. If an area is intended to flood, e.g. an upstream flood storage area designed to protect communities further downstream, then this should be safeguarded from development and identified as functional floodplain, even though it might not flood very often. 2 2007 Functional Floodplain Text taken from the 2007 Level 1 SFRA: Areas subject to flooding up to (and including) once in every 20 years on average have been delineated. These areas have been sub-delineated on the basis of current land use, i.e. open space or currently undeveloped areas (i.e ‘Zone 3b Functional Floodplain (Undeveloped)’) vs areas that are ‘previously developed’ (i.e. ‘Zone 3b Functional Floodplain (Developed)’). Within the context of the SFRA, ‘previously developed’ areas are solely existing buildings that are impermeable to floodwaters. The land surrounding these buildings are important flow paths and/or flood storage areas that must be retained. 3 Functional Floodplain Delineation Based on the above guidance and definitions provided in the FRCC-PPG, the following models and modelled flood outlines (MFO) were provided by the EA.: Watercourse Extent Data Source Included in Functional Floodplain delineation (Yes/No) River Lune Forge Bank Weir to River Lune Flood Zones Yes – 4% AEP defended MFO Sunderland Point and ABD Mapping Study (2011) River Keer A6/A601 road junction to Lune 2 Tributaries Flood Yes – 4% AEP undefended estuary mouth Risk Mapping Study MFO* (2007) River Conder M6 motorway to south of Lune 2 Tributaries Flood Yes – 4% AEP undefended Galgate village near Risk Mapping Study MFO* Lancaster Canal (2007) Ou Beck Shearset Bridge to Lune 2 Tributaries Flood Yes – 4% AEP undefended confluence with River Risk Mapping Study MFO Conder (2007) Whitley Beck M6 motorway near Lune 2 Tributaries Flood Yes – 4% AEP undefended Smith Green to Risk Mapping Study MFO confluence with River (2007) Conder Back Lane East of Carnforth to Lune 2 Tributaries Flood Yes – 4% AEP undefended Watercourse confluence with River Risk Mapping Study MFO (inc. Nether Keer (2007) Beck) River Wenning Four reaches have Lune 2 Tributaries Flood Yes – 4% AEP undefended MFOs: Risk Mapping Study MFO* High Bentham (2007) Low Bentham Wennington Hornby www.jbaconsulting.com www.jbarisk.com Page 2 of 5 www.jbaenergy.com NOTE TO FILE JBA Project Code 2016s5367 Contract Lancaster City Council Level 1 SFRA Client Lancaster City Council Day, Date and Time 5 June 2017 Author Tasmin Fletcher Subject Functional Floodplain Delineation *Although the 2007 study modelled these areas with defences, defended outlines for the 4% AEP event were not available for use in functional floodplain delineation. Further datasets interrogated: Functional Floodplain from previous SFRA (2007) EA Flood Storage Areas (FSA) – none present EA Areas Benefitting from Defences (ABD) EA Historic Flood Map (HFM) Urban areas - OSOpenMapLocal_Raster (to remove developed areas from functional floodplain) 3.1 GIS Methodology The 2007 functional floodplain provided the starting point (FZ3b_1.shp) and was compared to the current Flood Zone 3 of the Flood Map for Planning (version February 2017) to ascertain whether the Flood Map may have been updated since the 2007 FZ3b was finalised. No changes were made where the outlines were consistent with each other (i.e. from the same model), which was the case only for the 2007 Back Lane 4% AEP event MFO. In many locations the current EA FZ3 is different to the 2007 FZ3b outline, indicating that more recent modelling has been carried out since the 2007 FZ3b was produced. The following MFO were merged with the 2007 FZ3b outline (FZ3b_2.shp): o The 2011 River Lune 4% AEP defended outline was used to update the functional floodplain for parts of fluvial River Lune (see table below for locations) o The 2007 River Keer 4% AEP undefended outline was used to update the functional floodplain for parts of the River Keer (see table below for locations) o The 2007 River Conder 4% AEP undefended outline was used to update the functional floodplain for parts of the River Conder, Ou Beck and Whitley Beck (see table below for locations) o The 2007 River Wenning 4% AEP undefended outline was used to update the functional floodplain for parts of the River Wenning (see table below for locations) o The 2007 Back Lane Watercourse 4% AEP undefended outline was used to update the functional floodplain for parts of the Back Lane Watercourse (see table below for locations) Areas where no modelled flood outlines were available have been updated using Flood Zone 3 (FZ3b_3.shp) The HFM layer was added but only for fluvial areas and where MFOs were not provided (FZ3b_4.shp) As defended flood outlines were not available for the Rivers Wenning, Keer and Conder, the ADB dataset was used to removed areas which would be defended against flooding and therefore should not be defined as functional floodplain (FZ3b_5.shp) The OS Open Data OSOpenMapLocal_Raster dataset was used to identify urban areas, waterbodies and transport infrastructure to be removed from the functional floodplain (FZ3b_6.shp). Watercourse Extent Data Source Forge Bank Weir to Sunderland River Lune Flood Zones and ABD River Lune Point Mapping Study (2011) River Lune Upstream of Forge Bank Weir Flood Zone 3 (February 2017 version) A6/A601 road junction to estuary Lune 2 Tributaries Flood Risk Mapping River Keer mouth Study (2007) River Keer Upstream of A6/A601 road junction Flood Zone 3 (February 2017 version) M6 motorway to south of Galgate Lune 2 Tributaries Flood Risk Mapping River Conder village near Lancaster Canal Study (2007) Upstream of M6 River Conder motorway/Southwest of Galgate Flood Zone 3 (February 2017 version) village www.jbaconsulting.com www.jbarisk.com Page 3 of 5 www.jbaenergy.com NOTE TO FILE JBA Project Code 2016s5367 Contract Lancaster City Council
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wildlife in North Lancashire 2014
    Wildlife In North Lancashire 2014 33rd Annual Newsletter of the North Lancashire Wildlife Group Price £2.50 North Lancashire Wildlife Group Chairman's Report 2014 The Group is a local group of the Wildlife Trust for Lancashire, Manchester & N.Merseyside, primarily for After two, rather sad years, this year has been members living in the Lancaster City Council District and somewhat better, indeed considerably better, starting immediately adjacent areas of Lancashire, South with the weather. After a precocious start, we were Cumbria and North Yorkshire. blessed with a wonderful summer and autumn, and only lately has the cold weather arrived. For one, I have Meetings are open to all members of the Wildlife Trust. been very grateful for the clear nights, tracking comet If you are not already a member, come along to a few Lovejoy across the early evening sky. meetings and, if you like what we do, join us. So we now have a new name, North Lancashire Wildlife The Committee coordinates all the work of the Group Group, and a revamped website. But I am afraid some and, in particular, arranges meetings, field outings, things do not change. Attendance at our winter recording sessions, and the production of an annual meetings stays on the low side, and our committee Newsletter. The Recorders receive and collate records suffers from the same problem. Yet, compared to other to help conserve interesting sites, to monitor changing similar groups, we are very active and more than most numbers and distribution of species and to contribute to so it is not all doom and gloom.
    [Show full text]
  • 15 Lower Dolphinholme | Lancaster | LA2 9AX Cobble Cottage
    Fine & Country Tel: +44 (0)1524 380560 Cobble Cottage sales@fi neandcountry-lakes.co.uk 15 Lower Dolphinholme | Lancaster | LA2 9AX 8384344-print-Covers.indd 1-3 08/05/2019 18:28:06 FINE & COUNTRY Fine & Country is a global network of estate agencies This unique approach to luxury homes marketing specialising in the marketing, sale and rental of delivers high quality, intelligent and creative concepts luxury residential property. With offices in the UK, for property promotion combined with the latest COBBLE COTTAGE Ireland, The Channel Islands, France, Spain, Hungary, technology and marketing techniques. Portugal, Russia, Dubai, Egypt, South Africa, West Africa and Namibia we combine the widespread We understand moving home is one of the most exposure of the international marketplace with the important decisions you make; your home is both local expertise and knowledge of carefully selected a financial and emotional investment. With Fine & independent property professionals. Country you benefit from the local knowledge, experience, expertise and contacts of Fine & Country appreciates the most exclusive a well trained, educated and courteous team of properties require a more compelling, sophisticated professionals, working to make the sale or purchase and intelligent presentation - leading to a common, of your property as stress free as possible. yet uniquely exercised and successful strategy emphasising the lifestyle qualities of the property. 8384344-print-Covers.indd 4-6 08/05/2019 18:28:07 8384344-print-Pages.indd 1 08/05/2019 18:27:40 8384344-print-Pages.indd 2 08/05/2019 18:27:41 Located in the picturesque village of Lower Dolphinholme, Cobble Cottage is a Grade II listed stone built semi-detached property that is believed to date back to 1790.
    [Show full text]
  • Borwick Fishing, Kellet Lane, Over
    Agenda Item Committee Date Application Number A5 15 September 2014 14/00282/FUL Application Site Proposal Borwick Fishing Erection of a 45 metre high wind turbine from ground to blade tip with ancillary infrastructure Kellet Lane Over Kellet Lancashire Name of Applicant Name of Agent Mr Russell Adams, on behalf of Borwick Fishing Mr Russell Adams Decision Target Date Reason For Delay 16 May 2014 To allow the applicant to provide additional information in response of the County Landscape Officer’s consultation comments Case Officer Mr Karl Glover Departure No Summary of Recommendation Approval 1.0 The Site and its Surroundings 1.1 The site that forms the subject of this application is known as Borwick Fishing Lakes and is located in an area of open countryside approximately 600m to the south west of the village settlement of Borwick and approximately 1.8m to the north east of Carnforth. The site is immediately adjacent to the M6 motorway towards the west, Borwick Lane to the north and Kellet Lane to the east with the River Keer running along the southern boundary of the site. The site is characterised by its extensive amount of open water consisting of 9 active fishing lakes spanning an overall site area of approximately 72 acres (29 hectares) with a dual pitched timber clad restaurant/café building (Catch 23) and car park located in close proximity to the entrance. The whole site is relatively flat with mainly grassed surfaces and sporadic groves of trees on small islands within the lakes. There is also a recently-engineered earth bund and a belt of mature trees positioned between the M6 Motorway along the western boundary of the site.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Fisheries Statistics 1984
    Summary of fishery statistics, 1984 Item Type monograph Publisher North West Water Authority Download date 24/09/2021 19:31:15 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/24904 Summary of Fisheries Statistics 1984 ISSN 0144-9141 SUMMARY OF FISHERIES STATISTICS, 1984 CONTESTS 1. Catch Statistics 1.1 Rod and line catches (from licence returns) 1.1.1 Salmon 1.1.2 Migratory Trout 1.2 . Commercial catches 1.2.1 Salmon 1.2.2 Migratory Trout 2. Fish Culture and Hatchery Operations 2.1 Brood fish collection 2.2 Hatchery operations and salmon and sea trout stocking 2.2.1 Holmwrangle Hatchery 2.2.1.1 Numbers of ova laid down 2.2.1.2 Salmon and sea trout planting 2.2.2 Middleton Hatchery 2.2.2.1 Numbers of ova laid down 2.2.2.2 Salmon and sea trout planting 2.2.3 Langcliffe Hatchery 2.2.3.1 Numbers of ova laid down 2.2.3.2 Salmon and sea trout planting - 1 - Restocking with Trout and Freshwater Fish 3.1 Non-migratory trout 3.1.1 Stocking by Angling Associations etc. and Fish Farms 3.1.2. Stocking by N.W.W.A. 3.1.2.1 North Cumbria 3.1.2.2 South Cumbria/North Lancashire 3.1.2.3 South Lancashire 3.1.2.4 Mersey and Weaver 3.2 Freshwater Fish 3.2.1 Stocking by Angling Associations, etc 3.2.2 Fish transfers carried out by N.W.W.A. 3.2.2.1 Northern Area 3.2.2.2 Southern Area - South Lancashire 3.2.2.3 Southern Area - Mersey and Weaver 3.2.3 Fish Grants from N.W.W.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Fisheries Statistics 1985
    DIRECTORATE OF PLANNING & ENGINEERING. SUMMARY OF FISHERIES STATISTICS 1985. ISSN 0144-9141 SUMMARY OF FISHERIES STATISTICS, 1985 CONTENTS 1. Catch Statistics 1.1 Rod and line catches (from licence returns) 1.1.1 Salmon 1.1.2 Migratory Trout 1.2 Commercial catches 1.2.1 Salmon 1.2.2 Migratory Trout 2. Fish Culture and Hatchery Operations 2.1 Brood fish collection 2.2 Hatchery operations and salmon and sea trout stocking 2.2.1 Holmwrangle Hatchery 2.2.1.1 Numbers of ova laid down 2.2.1.2 Salmon and sea trout planting 2.2.2 Middleton Hatchery 2.2.2.1 Numbers of ova laid down 2.2.2.2 Salmon, and sea trout planting 2.2.3 Langcliffe Hatchery 2.2.3.1 Numbers of ova laid down 2.2.3.2 Salmon and sea trout planting - 1 - 3. Restocking with Trout and Freshwater Fish 3.1 Non-migratory trout 3.1.1 Stocking by Angling Associations etc., and Fish Farms 3.1.2 Stocking by NWWA 3.1.2.1 North Cumbria 3.1.2.2 South Cumbria/North Lancashire 3.1.2.3 South Lancashire 3.1.2.4 Mersey and Weaver 3.2 Freshwater Fish 3.2.1 Stocking by Angling Associations, etc 3.2.2 Fish transfers carried out by N.W.W.A. 3.2.2.1 Northern Area 3.2.2.2 Southern Area - South Lancashire 3.2.2.3 Southern Area - Mersey and Weaver 4. Fish Movement Recorded at Authority Fish Counters 4.1 River Lune 4.2 River Kent 4.3 River Leven 4.4 River Duddon 4.5 River Ribble Catchment 4.6 River Wyre 4.7 River Derwent 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Lancashire Bird Report 2003
    Lancashire & Cheshire Fauna Society Publication No. 106 Lancashire Bird Report 2003 The Birds of Lancashire and North Merseyside S. J. White (Editor) W. C. Aspin, D. A. Bickerton, A. Bunting, S. Dunstan, C. Liggett, B. McCarthy, P. J. Marsh, D. J. Rigby, J. F. Wright 2 Lancashire Bird Report 2003 CONTENTS Introduction ........................................... Dave Bickerton & Steve White ........ 3 Review of the Year ............................................................. John Wright ...... 10 Systematic List Swans & Geese ........................................................ Charlie Liggett ...... 14 Ducks ....................................................................... Dominic Rigby ...... 22 Gamebirds ........................................................................ Bill Aspin ...... 37 Divers to Cormorants ................................................... Steve White ...... 40 Herons ................................................................. Stephen Dunstan ...... 46 Birds of Prey ........................................................ Stephen Dunstan ...... 49 Rails ................................................................................. Bill Aspin ...... 55 Oystercatcher to Plovers ............................................ Andy Bunting ...... 58 Knot to Woodcock .................................................... Charlie Liggett ...... 64 Godwits to Curlew ........................................................ Steve White ...... 70 Spotted Redshank to Phalaropes .......................
    [Show full text]
  • A Summary Report on Juvenile Salmonid Populations in the River Lune Catchment, 1981 to 1991
    A summary report on juvenile salmonid populations of the River Lune catchment, 1981 to 1991 Item Type monograph Authors McCubbing , D.J.F.; Farooqi, M.A.; Aprahamian , M.W. Publisher National Rivers Authority North West Region Download date 28/09/2021 21:25:51 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/24629 A Summary Report on Juvenile Salmonid Populations in the River Lune Catchment, 1981 to 1991 June 1993 A Summary Report on Juvenile Salmonid Populations in the River Lune Catchment, 1981 to 1991 D.J.F. McCubbing, M.A. Farooqi, M.W. Aprahamian National Rivers Authority June 1993 North West Region, Beathwaite, Levens, Kendal, Cumbria LA8 8NL. CONTENTS Page No. INTRODUCTION 1 Study Area 1 Methods 2 SALMON PRODUCTION 3 Variations in salmon productivity during the study period and their geographical distribution 3 Distribution of juvenile salmon with regard to obstructions, passable and impassable 7 Habitat suitability within catchment 8 Salmon stocking and parr production 9 Salmon productivity and stream width 10 TROUT PRODUCTION 10 Variations in trout productivity during the study period and their geographical distribution 11 Distribution of juvenile trout with regard to stream width 12 Distribution of stocked sea trout within the Lune system 13 JUVENILE SALMON VERSUS TROUT PRODUCTION 13 CONCLUSIONS ON SALMONID PRODUCTIVITY 14 REFERENCES 16 APPENDIX 17 INTRODUCTION It is the intention of this report to summarise the fisheries electrofishing survey work undertaken on the River Lune in the period 1981-85 and 1991. The National Rivers Authority has a duty to maintain, improve and develop the fisheries within England and wales as defined in the Water Resources Act 1991.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest of Bowland AONB Access Land
    Much of the new Access Land in Access Land will be the Forest of Bowland AONB is identified with an Access within its Special Protection Area Land symbol, and may be accessed by any bridge, stile, gate, stairs, steps, stepping stone, or other (SPA). works for crossing water, or any gap in a boundary. Such access points will have This European designation recognises the importance of the area’s upland heather signage and interpretation to guide you. moorland and blanket bog as habitats for upland birds. The moors are home to many threatened species of bird, including Merlin, Golden Plover, Curlew, Ring If you intend to explore new Parts of the Forest of Bowland Ouzel and the rare Hen Harrier, the symbol of the AONB. Area of Outstanding Natural access land on foot, it is important that you plan ahead. Beauty (AONB) are now For the most up to date information and what local restrictions may accessible for recreation on foot be in place, visit www.countrysideaccess.gov.uk or call the Open Access Helpline on 0845 100 3298 for the first time to avoid disappointment. Once out and about, always follow local signs because the Countryside & Rights of Way Act (CRoW) 2000 gives people new and advice. rights to walk on areas of open country and registered common land. Access may be excluded or restricted during Heather moorland is Many people exceptional weather or ground conditions Access Land in the for the purpose of fire prevention or to avoid danger to the public. Forest of Bowland itself a rare habitat depend on - 75% of all the upland heather moorland in the the Access AONB offers some of world and 15% of the global resource of blanket bog are to be found in Britain.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest of Bowland AONB PO Box 9, Guild House Cross Street, Preston, PR1 8RD Tel:01772 531473 Fax: 01772 533423 [email protected]
    Sense of Place Toolkit Forest of Bowland AONB PO Box 9, Guild House Cross Street, Preston, PR1 8RD Tel:01772 531473 Fax: 01772 533423 [email protected] www.forestofbowland.com The Forest of Bowland Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) is a nationally protected landscape and internationally important for its heather moorland, blanket bog and rare birds. The AONB is managed by a partnership of landowners, farmers, voluntary organisations, wildlife groups, recreation groups, local councils and government agencies, who work to protect, conserve and enhance the natural and cultural heritage of this special area. Lancashire County Council acts as the lead authority for the Forest of Bowland AONB Joint Advisory Committee a partnership comprising: Lancashire County Council, North Yorkshire County Council, Craven District Council, Lancaster City Council, Pendle Borough Council, Preston City Council, Ribble Valley Borough Council,Wyre Borough Council, Lancashire Association of Parish and Town Councils,Yorkshire Local Councils Association, NWDA, DEFRA, Countryside Agency, United Utilities plc, Environment Agency, English Nature, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB), Forest of Bowland Landowning and Farmers Advisory Group and the Ramblers Association. FOREST OF BOWLAND Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty Contents Welcome Welcome 02 Introduction 03 How to use this toolkit 05 A place to enjoy and keep special 07 Delicious local food and drink 13 A landscape rich in heritage 17 A living landscape 21 Wild open spaces 25 A special place for wildlife 29 Glossary 34 Welcome to the Sense of Place Toolkit. Its purpose is to help you to use the special qualities of the Forest of Bowland Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) in order to improve the performance of your business.
    [Show full text]
  • FOB Walking Maps 2007.Qxd
    Riverside Walk Walk Description The route follows the tarmac surfaced 4 Go through the gate and take the Start Point Distance/Time Terrain OS Explorer Lune Millennium Park pathway to the small path down to the river. Cross Bull Beck Picnic 5 Miles Roads, tracks and Crook O’Lune picnic area, then back to over a wooden footbridge and follow site on A683 fields. Can be wet OL41 Bull Beck along the bank of the River the path round to your right underfoot. ‘Forest of Bowland Lune over reasonably flat grazed pastures underneath the old railway bridge, SD 541 649 2 Hrs and Ribblesdale’ (which may be damp at times and are and over a second footbridge.Then susceptible to flooding after heavy rainfall). follow the river upstream along the 1 Park at Bull Beck Picnic site, just riverbank. In summer, rosebay willow N north east of Caton on the A683. herb (the ‘railway weed’) and the Cross the A683 and join the Lune great hairy willow herb dominate the Millennium Park pathway, heading left. old railway banks. The hawthorn hedges beside the 5 Cross Artle Beck using the new track have been traditionally ‘layed’ to footbridge, put in to replace the provide a durable stock barrier and stepping-stones. Do not cross the an excellent habitat for many birds. large British Waterways bridge in 2 Follow this path for 1 mile crossing a front of you, but carry on along the 5 bridge over Artle Beck. Nearby you riverbank looking up at the windmills will see a stone carving by the artist on Caton Moor.
    [Show full text]
  • Lune Local Er Annual Revie
    Lune Local Er Annual Revie ENVIRONMENT AGENCY has superb rivers of good quality clean This is due to a number of reasons water. The River Lune rises in the including lack of suitable places in the Cumbrian fells and flows out into the river for fish to spawn (lay their eggs) Irish Sea just down river o f Lancaster. and due to fluctuations in river flows. The Lune area is popular with visitors. In the east are the fells with picturesque The Lune area was once one of the most As fishing is an important recreational villages of Sedbergh, Kirkby Lonsdale important fisheries in England for salmon and commercial activity in the Lune area and Ingleton. Whilst the coast has the and trout. However, over the last ten years we are concentrating our efforts on holiday resort of Morecambe. The area the populations o f these fish have fallen. improving the size and health of fish ' ------------------------------------------------------------------ \ trees and fenced 10km of riverbank. Key successes This protects the riverbank from being • 10km of fencing and over 4,000 washed away and spoiling spawning trees planted with the Lune Habitat grounds whilst the trees encourage a Group at nine sites along the River variety of wildlife to flourish. Lune at Tebay, River Wenning and These improvements to rivers and River Rawthey. riverbanks have also led to otters • Major work with the Lune Habitat returning to the Lune area, as the result Group to protect the River Lune of our recent survey proved. from erosion at Bowderdale. We also like to feel that people benefit • Creation of a safe haven pond for from our work.
    [Show full text]
  • Overtown Cable, Overtown, Cowan Bridge, Lancashire
    Overtown Cable, Overtown, Cowan Bridge, Lancashire Archaeological Watching Brief Report Oxford Archaeology North May 2016 Electricity North West Issue No: 2016-17/1737 OA North Job No: L10606 NGR: SD 62944 76236 to SD 63004 76293 Overtown Cable, Overtown, Cowan Bridge, Lancashire: Archaeological Watching Brief 1 CONTENTS SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................... 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................... 3 1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Circumstances of Project .................................................................................... 4 1.2 Location, Topography and Geology ................................................................... 4 1.3 Historical and Archaeological Background ........................................................ 4 2. METHODOLOGY ......................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Project Design ..................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Watching Brief .................................................................................................... 6 2.3 Archive ................................................................................................................ 6 3. WATCHING BRIEF RESULTS .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]