DOCSLIB.ORG

Washington State Noxious Weed List Class a Noxious Weeds - Eradication Required Class B Noxious Weeds-Continued Class C Noxious Weeds

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Washington State Noxious Weed List Class a Noxious Weeds - Eradication Required Class B Noxious Weeds-Continued Class C Noxious Weeds ) pungens Hemizonia (previously Centromadia pungens pungens Centromadia , Spikeweed Noxious Weed Scientific Name Update: Name Scientific Weed Noxious Palouse Prairie habitat. Prairie Palouse Infestation Hawthorn English crowding out native species to rapidly degrade the the degrade rapidly to species native out crowding root system. Perhaps more concerning still, it is is it still, concerning more Perhaps system. root NWCB County Juan San of courtesy Image contribute to soil erosion due to it’s shallow 2 inch inch 2 shallow it’s to due erosion soil to contribute reduce hay yields. Ventenata is also known to to known also is Ventenata yields. hay reduce production systems, where it can significantly significantly can it where systems, production Gerald of Carr courtesy Image is a particular problem in pasture, CRP, and hay hay and CRP, pasture, in problem particular a is it is most prevalent in the southeastern region. It It region. southeastern the in prevalent most is it Hawthorn English Ventenata Washington, In Northwest. Pacific the throughout and managed areas in the past two decades decades two past the in areas managed and perennial grass systems and in disturbed areas areas disturbed in and systems grass perennial annual grass that has rapidly expanded in in expanded rapidly has that grass annual Ventenata is another weedy, nonnative, invasive, invasive, nonnative, weedy, another is Ventenata Image courtesy of Rich Old, XID Services Old, Rich of courtesy Image Ventenata dubia Ventenata Ventenata, : weed noxious C Class New native western hawthorn. hawthorn. western native Hawthorn is also capable of hybridizing with the the with hybridizing of capable also is Hawthorn valuable forage and can harm grazing animals. grazing harm can and forage valuable altering grassland and forest habitat. English English habitat. forest and grassland altering where it significantly reduces native plants and and plants native reduces significantly it where restricting the movement of wildlife, and and wildlife, of movement the restricting including grasslands and sagebrush steppe, steppe, sagebrush and grasslands including pasture and economically important land, land, important economically and pasture The unpalatable grass invades many ecosystems, ecosystems, many invades grass unpalatable The land and in natural areas, invading prime prime invading areas, natural in and land produce as much as 243 million seeds per acre. acre. per seeds million 243 as much as produce Island, where it is encroaching on agricultural agricultural on encroaching is it where Island, as two years. Moreover, the plant is estimated to to estimated is plant the Moreover, years. two as Washington, most particularly on San Juan Juan San on particularly most Washington, into the soil and its seeds remain viable for as long long as for viable remain seeds its and soil the into It has been escaping cultivation in western western in cultivation escaping been has It roots have been known to reach 40 inches deep deep inches 40 reach to known been have roots sharp spines that made it useful as a hedgerow. hedgerow. a as useful it made that spines sharp spikes with long awns. The Medusahead’s fibrous fibrous Medusahead’s The awns. long with spikes white, showy flowers, bright red fruit, and and fruit, red bright flowers, showy white, called culms, have alternating leaves and erect erect and leaves alternating have culms, called landscaping because of its densely clustered clustered densely its of because landscaping up to two feet tall, Medusahead’s thin stems, stems, thin Medusahead’s tall, feet two to up Medusahead in used been has that shrub large to tree small twisting, and is covered in small barbs. Growing Growing barbs. small in covered is and twisting, English hawthorn is a long-lived, deciduous deciduous long-lived, a is hawthorn English grass that can be somewhat spreading and and spreading somewhat be can that grass Crataegus monogyna Crataegus Hawthorn, English Medusahead is a weedy, nonnative, winter annual annual winter nonnative, weedy, a is Medusahead Medusahead, Medusahead, Taeniatherum caput-medusae Taeniatherum New Class C noxious weed: noxious C Class New : weed noxious C Class New Noxious weed list changes for 2016 for changes list weed Noxious County Contacts County Contacts Adams (509) 659-1806 Spokane (509) 477-5777 Adam - District #1 (509) 488-9023 Stevens (509) 684-7590 Asotin (509) 243-2098 Thurston (360) 786-5576 2016 Benton (509) 943-6005 Wahkiakum (360) 795-3852 Benton - District #1 (509) 786-5609 Walla Walla (509) 524-2688 Washington State Chelan (509) 667-6576 Whatcom (360) 778-6234 Clallam (360) 417-2442 Whitman (509) 397-6261 Noxious Weed List Clark (360) 397-6140 Yakima (509) 574-2180 Columbia (509) 382-9760 Cowlitz (360) 577-3117 To learn more about noxious weeds and noxious weed control in Washington State, Douglas (WSU) (509) 745-8531 please contact: Ferry (509) 775-5225 Ext. 1111 Franklin (509) 545-3847 WA State Noxious Weed Control Board Garfield (509) 843-1913 P.O. Box 42560 Grant (509) 754-2011 Ext. 375 Olympia, WA 98504-2560 (360)-725-5764 Grant - District #1 (509) 750-8948 Email: [email protected] Grant - District #3 (509) 785-3621 Website: http://www.nwcb.wa.gov Grays Harbor (360) 482-2265 Or Island (360) 678-7992 Jefferson (360) 379-5610 Ext. 205 WA State Department of Agriculture 21 North First Avenue #103 King (206) 477-9333 Yakima, WA 98902 Kitsap (360) 307-4242 (509) 249-6973 Kittitas (509) 962-7007 USDA-NRCS PLANTS Database / Hitchcock, A.S. (rev. A. Chase). Klickitat (509) 773-5810 1950. Manual of the grasses of the United States. USDA Miscellaneous Lewis (360) 740-1215 Publication No. 200. Washington, DC. Lincoln (509) 725-3646 Mason (360) 427-9670 Ext. 592 Okanogan (509) 422-7165 Medusahead (Taeniatherum caput-medusae) Pacific (360) 875-9425 a new Class C noxious weed for 2016 Pend Oreille (509) 447-2402 Pierce (253) 798-7263 San Juan (360) 376-3499 List arranged alphabetically by: Skagit (360) 336-9430 SCIENTIFIC NAME Skamania (509) 427-3941 Snohomish (425) 388-7548 To help protect the State’s resources and Weed Classes: A, B, and C Noxious Weeds are non-native plants introduced to Washington State that can economy, the Washington State Noxious Class A Weeds: Non-native species whose Weed Control Board adopts a State Noxious distribution in Washington is still limited. be highly destructive, competitive, and Weed List each year (WAC 16-750). This list Preventing new infestations and eradicating difficult to control. These plants invade our groups weeds into three major classes – A, existing infestations are the highest priority. croplands, rangeland, forests, parks, rivers, B, and C – based on the distribution of each Eradication of Class A plants is required by law. lakes, wetlands, and estuaries causing both species and the seriousness of the threat they Class B Weeds: Non-native species presently ecological and economical damage that pose to Washington State. This classification limited to portions of the State. Species are affects us all. Noxious weeds can: system is designed to: designated for control in regions where they are not yet widespread. Preventing new infestations • Lower crop yields • Prevent small infestations from expanding in these areas is a high priority. In regions where • Reduce forage quality by eradicating them when they are first a Class B species is already abundant, control is • Destroy plant and animal habitat detected decided at the local level, with containment as • Displace native plants the primary goal. Please contact your County • Restrict already established weed • Reduce recreational opportunities (e.g., populations to regions of the state where Noxious Weed Control Coordinator to learn which species are designated in your area. fishing, hunting, swimming and hiking) they occur and prevent their movement • Clog waterways to un-infested areas Class C Weeds: Noxious weeds that are typically widespread in WA or are of special interest to • Decrease land values • Allow flexibility of weed control at the the state’s agricultural industry. The Class C • Increase erosion and wildfire risk local level for weeds that are already status allows counties to require control if locally • And some are toxic to humans and widespread. desired. Other counties may choose to provide livestock. education or technical consultation. 2016 Washington State Noxious Weed List Class A Noxious Weeds - Eradication required Class B Noxious Weeds-Continued Class C Noxious Weeds Alliaria petiolata garlic mustard Centaurea jacea knapweed, brown Aegilops cylindrica jointed goatgrass Brachypodium sylvaticum false brome Centaurea x moncktonii knapweed, meadow Ailanthus altissima tree-of-heaven Butomus umbellatus flowering rush Centaurea nigra knapweed, black Alopecurus myosuroides blackgrass Carduus pycnocephalus thistle, Italian Centaurea solstitialis yellow starthistle Artemisia absinthium absinth wormwood Carduus tenuiflorus thistle, slenderflower Centaurea stoebe knapweed, spotted Arum italicum Italian arum Centaurea calcitrapa purple starthistle Chondrilla juncea rush skeletonweed Berberis vulgaris common barberry Centaurea macrocephala knapweed, bighead Conium maculatum poison hemlock Cenchrus longispinus longspine sandbur Centaurea nigrescens knapweed, Vochin Cynoglossum officinale houndstongue Centromadia pungens spikeweed Clematis orientalis oriental clematis Cyperus esculentus yellow nutsedge Cirsium arvense thistle, Canada Crupina vulgaris common crupina Cytisus scoparius Scotch broom Cirsium
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wild Plants of Big Break Regional Shoreline Common Name Version
    Wild Plants of Big Break Regional Shoreline Common Name Version A Photographic Guide Sorted by Form, Color and Family with Habitat Descriptions and Identification Notes Photographs and text by Wilde Legard District Botanist, East Bay Regional Park District New Revised and Expanded Edition - Includes the latest scientific names, habitat descriptions and identification notes Decimal Inches .1 .2 .3 .4 .5 .6 .7 .8 .9 1 .5 2 .5 3 .5 4 .5 5 .5 6 .5 7 .5 8 .5 9 1/8 1/4 1/2 3/4 1 1/2 2 1/2 3 1/2 4 1/2 5 1/2 6 1/2 7 1/2 8 1/2 9 English Inches Notes: A Photographic Guide to the Wild Plants of Big Break Regional Shoreline More than 2,000 species of native and naturalized plants grow wild in the San Francisco Bay Area. Most are very difficult to identify without the help of good illustrations. This is designed to be a simple, color photo guide to help you identify some of these plants. This guide is published electronically in Adobe Acrobat® format so that it can easily be updated as additional photographs become available. You have permission to freely download, distribute and print this guide for individual use. Photographs are © 2014 Wilde Legard, all rights reserved. In this guide, the included plants are sorted first by form (Ferns & Fern-like, Grasses & Grass-like, Herbaceous, Woody), then by most common flower color, and finally by similar looking flowers (grouped by genus within each family). Each photograph has the following information, separated by '-': COMMON NAME According to The Jepson Manual: Vascular Plants of California, Second Edition (JM2) and other references (not standardized).
    [Show full text]
  • Tidal Marsh Recovery Plan Habitat Creation Or Enhancement Project Within 5 Miles of OAK
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Recovery Plan for Tidal Marsh Ecosystems of Northern and Central California California clapper rail Suaeda californica Cirsium hydrophilum Chloropyron molle Salt marsh harvest mouse (Rallus longirostris (California sea-blite) var. hydrophilum ssp. molle (Reithrodontomys obsoletus) (Suisun thistle) (soft bird’s-beak) raviventris) Volume II Appendices Tidal marsh at China Camp State Park. VII. APPENDICES Appendix A Species referred to in this recovery plan……………....…………………….3 Appendix B Recovery Priority Ranking System for Endangered and Threatened Species..........................................................................................................11 Appendix C Species of Concern or Regional Conservation Significance in Tidal Marsh Ecosystems of Northern and Central California….......................................13 Appendix D Agencies, organizations, and websites involved with tidal marsh Recovery.................................................................................................... 189 Appendix E Environmental contaminants in San Francisco Bay...................................193 Appendix F Population Persistence Modeling for Recovery Plan for Tidal Marsh Ecosystems of Northern and Central California with Intial Application to California clapper rail …............................................................................209 Appendix G Glossary……………......................................................................………229 Appendix H Summary of Major Public Comments and Service
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX D Biological Technical Report
    APPENDIX D Biological Technical Report CarMax Auto Superstore EIR BIOLOGICAL TECHNICAL REPORT PROPOSED CARMAX AUTO SUPERSTORE PROJECT CITY OF OCEANSIDE, SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: EnviroApplications, Inc. 2831 Camino del Rio South, Suite 214 San Diego, California 92108 Contact: Megan Hill 619-291-3636 Prepared by: 4629 Cass Street, #192 San Diego, California 92109 Contact: Melissa Busby 858-334-9507 September 29, 2020 Revised March 23, 2021 Biological Technical Report CarMax Auto Superstore TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 3 SECTION 1.0 – INTRODUCTION ................................................................................... 6 1.1 Proposed Project Location .................................................................................... 6 1.2 Proposed Project Description ............................................................................... 6 SECTION 2.0 – METHODS AND SURVEY LIMITATIONS ............................................ 8 2.1 Background Research .......................................................................................... 8 2.2 General Biological Resources Survey .................................................................. 8 2.3 Jurisdictional Delineation ...................................................................................... 9 2.3.1 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Jurisdiction .................................................... 9 2.3.2 Regional Water Quality
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix D Species Accounts Appendix D Species Accounts
    Appendix D Species Accounts Appendix D Species Accounts Table of Contents San Joaquin Spearscale (Atriplex joaquiniana) ...................................................... 1 Recurved Larkspur (Delphinium recurvatum) ........................................................ 4 Big Tarplant (Blepharizonia plumosa) .................................................................... 6 Congdon’s Tarplant (Centromadia parryi ssp. congdonii) ..................................... 8 Palmate-bracted bird’s-beak (Cordylanthus palmatus) ....................................... 10 Livermore tarplant (Deinandra bacigalupii) ........................................................ 11 Longhorn Fairy Shrimp ......................................................................................... 12 Vernal Pool Fairy Shrimp ..................................................................................... 15 Callippe Silverspot Butterfly ................................................................................ 18 California Tiger Salamander ................................................................................. 21 California Red-Legged Frog .................................................................................. 25 Foothill yellow-legged frog .................................................................................. 28 Alameda Whipsnake ............................................................................................ 31 Central California Coast Steelhead .....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Western Riverside County MSHCP Survey Guidelines & Protocols
    COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TRANSPORTATION AND LAND MANAGEMENT AGENCY Environmental Programs Department Western Riverside County Carolyn Syms Luna Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) Director Survey Guidelines and Protocols July 18, 2007 The following list of available survey guidelines and protocols are generally acceptable in the County of Riverside for proper implementation of the MSHCP. Contact the Environmental Programs Department (EPD) with any questions regarding the necessary survey protocols. Individual species accounts may be located in Volume II-B, The Reference Document; Species Accounts. Specific hyperlinks to survey protocols existing online are included where available. The County of Riverside, Environmental Programs Department is not responsible for the information, content, or availability of the listed web site hyperlinks not maintained by the County. They are created by their organizations and we are only providing links to them as a service in relation to government, state, or local/regional County of Riverside issues. Table 1. General Survey Guidelines & Resources Activity Survey Protocol/ Methodology Date* Conducting field work at amphibian The Declining Amphibian Task Force Fieldwork -- breeding sites or in other aquatic habitats Code of Practice Record searches California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) – -- CDFG California Native Plant Society Electronic Inventory – CNPS Reporting sensitive species identified in California Native Species Field Survey Form – -- the California Natural Diversity Database
    [Show full text]
  • Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA) Annual Report to the Wildlife Agencies
    Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) Biological Monitoring Program Rare Plant Survey Report 2011 08 June 2012 Rare Plant Survey Report 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................................................................1 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ...................................................................................................................1 METHODS ....................................................................................................................................................2 PROTOCOL DEVELOPMENT ................................................................................................................2 SURVEY SITE SELECTION...................................................................................................................2 SURVEY METHODS ............................................................................................................................4 PERSONNEL AND TRAINING ...............................................................................................................5 DATA ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................................6 RESULTS.......................................................................................................................................................7 DISCUSSION ................................................................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Element Stewardship Abstract for Hemizonia Pungens Torr
    ELEMENT STEWARDSHIP ABSTRACT for Hemizonia pungens Spikeweed To the User: Element Stewardship Abstracts (ESAs) are prepared to provide The Nature Conservancy's Stewardship staff and other land managers with current management-related information on those species and communities that are most important to protect, or most important to control. The abstracts organize and summarize data from numerous sources including literature and researchers and managers actively working with the species or community. We hope, by providing this abstract free of charge, to encourage users to contribute their information to the abstract. This sharing of information will benefit all land managers by ensuring the availability of an abstract that contains up-to-date information on management techniques and knowledgeable contacts. Contributors of information will be acknowledged within the abstract and receive updated editions. To contribute information, contact the editor whose address is listed at the end of the document. For ease of update and retrievability, the abstracts are stored on computer at the national office of The Nature Conservancy. This abstract is a compilation of available information and is not an endorsement of particular practices or products. Please do not remove this cover statement from the attached abstract. Authors of this Abstract: John Randall © THE NATURE CONSERVANCY 1815 North Lynn Street, Arlington, Virginia 22209 (703) 841 5300 The Nature Conservancy Element Stewardship Abstract For Hemizonia pungens Torr. & Gray (synonyms: Centromadia pungens Greene; Hartmannia pungens H. & A.) I. IDENTIFIERS Common Name: Common Spikeweed General Description: Some taxonomists place H. pungens in section Centromadia which is regarded as a natural group within the genus Hemizonia based on analyses of morphology, distribution, genetics and cytology (Venkatesh 1958).
    [Show full text]
  • Recurved Larkspur(Delphinium Recurvatum) Species Profile
    Plants Recurved Larkspur (Delphinium recurvatum) Recurved Larkspur (Delphinium recurvatum) Status Federal: None State: None CNPS: List 1B Population Trend Global: Unknown State: Unknown Within Inventory Area: Unknown Data Characterization © 1998 Dean Wm. Taylor The location database for recurved larkspur (Delphinium recurvatum) includes 63 data records dated from 1902 to 1998 (California Natural Diversity Database 2001). Thirteen of the occurrences are more than 50 years old, and only 20 of the occurrences were documented in the previous 10 years, but most of the occurrences are assumed to be extant. Twenty-seven of the occurrences are of high precision and may be accurately located, including 2 of 4 located within the inventory area. Very little ecological information is available for recurved larkspur. The literature on the species pertains primarily to its taxonomy. The main sources of general information on this species are the Jepson Manual (Hickman 1993) and the California Native Plant Society (2001). Specific observations on habitat and plant associates, threats, and other factors are summarized in the California Natural Diversity Database (2001). Range Historically, recurved larkspur was widely distributed in California’s Great Valley, ranging from Butte County to Kern County. Most of the known occurrences are in Kern, Tulare, and San Luis Obispo Counties. The species now appears to be very rare outside the southern San Joaquin Valley (California Natural Diversity Database 2001). Occurrences within the ECCC HCP/NCCP Inventory Area Four occurrences are reported from the inventory area, 3 of which are on private land southeast of Byron. Species Accounts ♦ Plants East Contra Costa County HCP/NCCP 1 Plants Recurved Larkspur (Delphinium recurvatum) Biology Physical Description Recurved larkspur is a perennial herb and a member of the buttercup family (Ranunculaceae).
    [Show full text]
  • Spikeweed (Pdf)
    FC Noxious Weed Control Physical: 502 Boeing St Pasco WA Best Management Practices Mail: 1016 N 4th Ave Pasco WA 99301 Phone: 509-545-3847 Email: [email protected] Website: www.fcweedboard.com Spikeweed Centromadia pungens Class C Noxious Weed Family: Asteraceae Local Control Background Information Spikeweed is of the Asteraceae family. It may also be referred to as spiny tarweed. Spikeweed is a late sea- son annual, native to dry grasslands of California’s Central Valley and seasonally wet areas of that state’s Central Valley. Introduction of spikeweed into southeastern Washington occurred within the last century. It is a prolific seed producer and agricultural pest in Franklin County, invading roadsides, field edges, moist waste areas, low alkaline sites, and rangeland. Spikeweed can grow to 3 feet or more depending on availa- bility of moisture. It has rigid, freely branching stems giving the plant a sprawling appearance. Leaves and flowerhead bracts are spine-tipped. Large plants may produce over 100 flowerheads while smallest plants may produce just a few. Rosettes bolt in late spring, followed by yellow ray and disk flowers from June through September. Seeds fall near the parent plant, dispersed by wind or maintenance equipment. Impacts Spikeweed competes for mois- ture and nutrients with agricul- tural crops. Plants are spiny and form dense stands impeding movement of livestock, mainte- nance equipment and water. Livestock avoid grazing spike- weed. It establishes rapidly in environments favorable to its growth because of its high seed production. An infestation quickly forms an impenetrable barrier to livestock and wildlife. Dense stand in Franklin County Key Identifying Traits Basal leaves are yellowish-green, stiff, 2-6 inches in length with narrow lobes.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Vascular Plants of San Diego County 5Th Edition
    cHeckliSt of tHe vaScUlaR PlaNtS of SaN DieGo coUNty 5th edition Pinus torreyana subsp. torreyana Downingia concolor var. brevior Thermopsis californica var. semota Pogogyne abramsii Hulsea californica Cylindropuntia fosbergii Dudleya brevifolia Chorizanthe orcuttiana Astragalus deanei by Jon P. Rebman and Michael G. Simpson San Diego Natural History Museum and San Diego State University examples of checklist taxa: SPecieS SPecieS iNfRaSPecieS iNfRaSPecieS NaMe aUtHoR RaNk & NaMe aUtHoR Eriodictyon trichocalyx A. Heller var. lanatum (Brand) Jepson {SD 135251} [E. t. subsp. l. (Brand) Munz] Hairy yerba Santa SyNoNyM SyMBol foR NoN-NATIVE, NATURaliZeD PlaNt *Erodium cicutarium (L.) Aiton {SD 122398} red-Stem Filaree/StorkSbill HeRBaRiUM SPeciMeN coMMoN DocUMeNTATION NaMe SyMBol foR PlaNt Not liSteD iN THE JEPSON MANUAL †Rhus aromatica Aiton var. simplicifolia (Greene) Conquist {SD 118139} Single-leaF SkunkbruSH SyMBol foR StRict eNDeMic TO SaN DieGo coUNty §§Dudleya brevifolia (Moran) Moran {SD 130030} SHort-leaF dudleya [D. blochmaniae (Eastw.) Moran subsp. brevifolia Moran] 1B.1 S1.1 G2t1 ce SyMBol foR NeaR eNDeMic TO SaN DieGo coUNty §Nolina interrata Gentry {SD 79876} deHeSa nolina 1B.1 S2 G2 ce eNviRoNMeNTAL liStiNG SyMBol foR MiSiDeNtifieD PlaNt, Not occURRiNG iN coUNty (Note: this symbol used in appendix 1 only.) ?Cirsium brevistylum Cronq. indian tHiStle i checklist of the vascular plants of san Diego county 5th edition by Jon p. rebman and Michael g. simpson san Diego natural history Museum and san Diego state university publication of: san Diego natural history Museum san Diego, california ii Copyright © 2014 by Jon P. Rebman and Michael G. Simpson Fifth edition 2014. isBn 0-918969-08-5 Copyright © 2006 by Jon P.
    [Show full text]
  • Brushy Peak Regional Preserve Checklist of Wild Plants Sorted Alphabetically by Growth Form, Scientific Name
    Brushy Peak Regional Preserve Checklist of Wild Plants Sorted Alphabetically by Growth Form, Scientific Name This is a comprehensive list of the wild plants reported to be found in Brushy Peak Regional Preserve. The plants are sorted alphabetically by growth form, then by sci- entific name. This list includes the common name, family, status, invasiveness rating, origin, longevity, habitat, and bloom dates. EBRPD plant names that have changed since the 1993 Jepson Manual are listed alphabetically in an appendix. Column Heading Description Checklist column for marking off the plants you observe Scientific Name According to The Jepson Manual: Vascular Plants of California, Second Edition (JM2) and eFlora (ucjeps.berkeley.edu/IJM.html) (JM93 if different) If the scientific name used in the 1993 edition of The Jepson Manual (JM93) is different, the change is noted as (JM93: xxx) Common Name According to JM2 and other references (not standardized) Family Scientific family name according to JM2, abbreviated by replacing the “aceae” ending with “-” (ie. Asteraceae = Aster-) Status Special status rating (if any), listed in 3 categories, divided by vertical bars (‘|’): Federal/California (Fed./Calif.) | California Native Plant Society (CNPS) | East Bay chapter of the CNPS (EBCNPS) Fed./Calif.: FE = Fed. Endangered, FT = Fed. Threatened, CE = Calif. Endangered, CR = Calif. Rare CNPS (online as of 2012-01-23): 1B = Rare, threatened or endangered in Calif, 3 = Review List, 4 = Watch List; 0.1 = Seriously endangered in California, 0.2 = Fairly endangered in California EBCNPS (online as of 2012-01-23): *A = Statewide listed rare; A1 = 2 East Bay regions or less; A1x = extirpated; A2 = 3-5 regions; B = 6-9 Inv California Invasive Plant Council Inventory (Cal-IPCI) Invasiveness rating: H = High, L = Limited, M = Moderate, N = Native OL Origin and Longevity.
    [Show full text]
  • Focusing Upon Great Valley and Carrizo Plain Grassland Habitats
    California Rangeland Monitoring and Mapping: Focusing upon Great Valley and Carrizo Plain Grassland Habitats Final Report Submitted to Natural Resources Conservation Service California Conservation Innovation Grant Prepared By Jennifer Buck-Diaz, Jaime Ratchford and Julie Evens 2707 K Street, Suite 1 Sacramento CA, 95816 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page Figures .......................................................................................................................... iii Tables ............................................................................................................................ iv Executive Summary ...................................................................................................... v Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................... vi Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 Methods ......................................................................................................................... 2 Study area .............................................................................................................................. 2 Field Sampling and Classification ........................................................................................... 2 Stand Tables .......................................................................................................................... 5 Environmental Data
    [Show full text]