<<

MINERALOGICAL NOTES

THE AMERICAN MINERALOGIST, \TOL. 55, MAY_JUNE, 1970

COEXISTINGGLAUCOPHANE AND - ARFVEDSONITEFROM NEW CALEDONIA Purr-rppe M. Bracx,l Departmentof ' Sciences,Smithsonian I nstitution, W ashingtonD.C. 20560 Assrnec:f Electronmicroprobe analyses are givenfor coexistingglaucophane and riebeckite- arfvedsonitefrom a -bearingmetabasalt. Possible origins of the amphiboleas- sociationare discussed. Relationships between coexisting sodic and calcic are now well documented (Klein, 1968b; Himmelberg and Papike, 1969), but there have been few records of coexisting sodic amphiboles, and phase relations within the complex alkali system are still not well understood. During a study of amphiboles in the New caledonian ,an example of coexisting glaucophaneand riebeckite-arfvedsonitewas found in a metabasalt outcropping lawsonite- bearing pelitic of the Pilou Formation (Espirat and Millon, 1965) 1 km east of Col de Crbve-coeur. Thin sectionsof the metabasalt (10811) show relic phenocrystsof augite overgrown by ,lawsonite, chlorite, accessoryalbite, and . Riebeckite- constitutes less than 0.2 modal percent of the rock and occurs most commonly as small green blebs averaging 20 microns in diameter, enclosedwithin glaucophanecrystals, or rarely as larger more regular anhedra incompletely surrounded by individual glaucophanes(Fig. 1). Chemically and optically the contact. between the two amphiboles is sharp, but cleavagespersist through both amphiboles (Fig. 1.) indicating that the two phases are in crystallo- graphic continuity. The glaucophane shows the following pleochroic schemeand orientation:a:colourless; 0:violet; t:blue; b:P; cA"l: 5o; while the riebeckite-arfvedsonitehas: a:deep bluish green;B:deep olive greenl yellowish green; 6:7; c/\a--6o. No exsolution lamellae have":pale been observed in either amphibole. The two amphibole phaseswere analysed with an A'R'L'-E'M'X' electron microprobe using the standards and analysing procedures dis- cussedby Klein (1968 a,b). The analysesare presentedin Table 1' Es- timated errors are 3 percent for major and 5 percent for min or constit- uents. No attempt has been made to estimate the Fez+:Fe3+ ratio; the analyseshave been recalculatedanhydrous on the basis of 23 oxygensper

r Present address: Department of Geology, Auckland university, Auckland, New Zea- land. r062 MINERALOGICAL NOTES

Frc. 1. Dark riebeckite-arfvedsonite anhedra partially surrounded by lighter glauco- phane (center), and small riebeckite-arfvedsonite bleb (A) enclosed within glaucophane (lower left). (X500).

unit cell assumingtotal iron as Feo. A knowledgeof the oxidation ratio of the amphiboles and subsequentcalculation of part of the iron as Fe2o3 will have the effectof reducingSii" and henceAl"i (coordinationnumber 6) but will not radically change other values. The optical orientation, pleochroicscheme and formula which can be derived from the microprobe analysis of the iron-rich amphibole are al-

Tarr,r 1. couposrrroN ol conxtsrrxc Gr-aucopnaNe axr Rtnnncxrtr-Aru.l,lDs,Nrre

Glauc. Rb-Arfv. Rb-Arfv

sio, 55.2 502 Si 7.72 8.03 TiOz 0.1 0.5 AIi" o.28 AhOr 9.7 t.7 IreO, 1)4 30.4 Al"i 1.321 034 MnO 0.2 u.5 Ti -l I 0.071 Mgo 12.0 s 3.2 Fe2+ 1.4s fs .2e 4.o7ls.2e CaO r.7 14 Mn 0.021 0.071 NurO 7.0 5.4 Mg 2.50) o.76) KrO 2.0

Total 98.3 96.3 Ca 0.2.51 0.411 Na 1.e0f2.ls r.6712.48 K - ) 0.40J

" Total iron calcuiated as FeO. MINERALOGICAL NOTES 1063 most identical to the data given for arfvedsoniteby Miyashiro (1957),but according to the later classifi.cationscheme of Borg (1967) the amphibole with its A site occupancy of ) 0.4 should be called riebeckite-arfvedsonite and Borg's terminology is followed here. Recent oxygen isotope work (Taylor and Colemen, 1968) has shown that lawsonite bearing blueschists crystallized at temperatures of 200- 400"C. The riebeckite-arfvedsonite bearing metabasalt occurs close to the lawsonite isograd in the lower grades of the New Caledonian blue- schists and probably crystallized in the lower part of the temperature range given by Taylor and Coleman (1968). The relations between members of the glaucophane-riebeckiteseries are well known and solid solution between end membershas been demon- strated by a number of authors (Miyashiro, i957;norg, 1967;Coleman and Papike, 1968). A complete solid solution seriesbetween riebeckite and arfvedsonite has been synthesizedby Ernst (1962) who observedno exsolution between synthetic end members at temperatures as low as 4200,c. The coexistence,at low temperatures, of two amphiboles which are known to form part of a solid solution seriesunder a wider range of P-? conditions is interesting and a discussion of the possible origins of the associationis warranted. The riebeckite-arfvedsonite is unlikely to be a relic igneous mineral since (to this writer's knowledge) sodic amphiboles are unknown in ba- salts. Primary igneousamphiboles do occur in the lower Tertiary basalts of northern New Caledonia but in all casesthey are kaersutitic horn- blendes. Chemical analysisof the metabasalt (SiOz:49.0; TiOr:2'0; AlO3: 18.5;Fe2O3: 4.2;FeO:4.7; MnO:0.14; MgO: 7'4;CaO:10'3; Na2O: 3.0; KrO:0.05; P2Q6:Q.08;HrO*:0'5) showsit to be a normal tho- Ieiitic basalt, compositionally similar to other basalts in the district. Metasediments adjacent to the basalt are fine grained lawsonite-albite phyllites, completely lacking in sodic amphiboles. There is no evidence, either from the composition of the metabasalt or from the surrounding metasediments, to suggest that the rocks may have been subjected to percolating iron-rich waters capable of crystallizing a riebeckitic am- phibole prior to the onset of ' The metamorphic history of the New Caledonianblueschist belt is very simple, and there is no evidencefor more than one metamorphic event. The association of riebeckite-arfvedsonite with glaucophane could be interpreted as due to a change in one or more of the physico-chemical variables during the metamorphism although if this were the case a gradual chemical transition between the two amphiboles would be ex- expectedrather than the observed sharp chemical and optical contacts. r064 MINERALOGICAL NOTES

Ross, el al. (1969) have described an exsolution sequenceleading to the production of homogeneouspatches of an exsolvedphase within the host clinoamphibole. Such a processcould possibly explain the association and textural relations of the riebeckite-arfvedsonite and glaucophane. However, exsolutionlamellae have not been observedin alkali amphiboles although Sahama (1956) has interpreted optical anomaliesin natural arfvedsonites as exsolution features. There seemsto be no convincingexplanation for the coexistenceof the riebeckite-arfvedsonitewith glaucophaneand hencethe question whether the two amphiboles are an equilibrium or a disequilibrium assemblage must remain unresolved.Nevertheless, it should be pointed out that in the event that the two amphibolesare an equilibrium assemblage,the data presentedhere would indicate that a solvus exist between the riebeckite-arfvedsonite solid solution series and at least the aluminous members of the glaucophane-riebeckitesolid solution seriesunder the P-? conditions of the low temperature lawsonite-bearingblueschist facies.

Acr

I am grateful to Dr C. Klein (Harvard University) for the amphibole microprobe standards and to Mr T. H. Wilson (Auckland University) for the chemical analvsis of the metabasalt.

RrlrnpNcns

Bonc, I. (1967) Optical properties and cell parameters in the glaucophane-riebeckite series. Co ntrib. M i.ner ol. P etrol o gy, 15, 67-92. Cor.rurN, R. G. eNo J. J. Parrxr (1968) Alkali amphiboles from the blueschists of Caza- dero, California, f. Petrology, g, 105-122. EnNsr, W. G. (L962) Synthesis, stability relations and occurrence of riebeckite and riebec- kite-arfvedsonite solid solutions. f . Geol.70, 679-736. Esrrner, J J. eNo R. MrlroN (1965) Carte et notice explicative sur la feuille pam-Ou6goa. Ca.rtegAologi,que d l' 6chel,l,edw 1/ 50000 Territoire de I,aN ouvel,l,e-Caleilonie. rrruuelrrnc, G. R. aul J. J. Parrrc (1969) coexisting amphiboles from blueschist facies metamorphic rocks. L Petrology,lO, 102,114. Klnrw, C. (1968a) Coexisting amphiboles. f . Petrology, g, 281-330. - (1968b) Two amphibole assemblages in the system -hornblende-glauco- phane. Amer. MineraJ.54, 212-237. Mrvesnlno, A. (1957) The chemistry, optics and genesisof the alkali amphiboles. -/. Foc. Sci. Unht. Tohyo Sec.II,11,57-83. Ross, M., J. J. Palrxn, erlo K. W. Snew (1969) Exsolution textures in amphiboles as indicatorsof subsolidusthermalhistories. Mi,neral.Soc.Amer.Spec.paper2,2T5-299. Sau-nua, Tu. G. (1956) optical anornalies in arfvedsonite from Greenland. Ama. Mineral,. 41, 509-512. Tavlon, H. P. erl R. G. Cor,ruelr (1968) Os/O16 ratios of coexisting in glauco- phane bearing metamorphic rccks. Geol,.Soc. Amer. Butt,.79, 1727-1756.