DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental & Social Impact Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental & Social Impact Assessment Environmental & Social Impact Assessment Woodchip Biomass Production Buchanan Renewables Fuel Prepared By: EARTHTIME INC. October, 2009 Environmental & Social Impact Assessment Buchanan Renewables Fuel Table of Contents 2010 EARTHTIME INC. BUCHANAN RENEWABLES FUEL INC. Document Type: ESIA BR FUEL Contract Ref: SQ 100908-01 250 Excluding BR FUEL ESIA No. of Pages: Appendices Environmental & Social Impact Assessment Version Final Report Approved by Wassim Hamdan Project Manager October 07, 2010 Reviewed by Issam Bou Jaoude Peer Reviewer October 06, 2010 Prepared by Dia Karanouh Forestry Management October 06, 2010 Environmental & Social Rena Karanouh September 28, 2010 Consultant Yasmin El Helwe Environmental September 28, 2010 Consultant Cornelius Wright Technical Assistant September 28, 2010 DISCLAIMER This report has been prepared by EARTHTIME INC. , with all reasonable skill, care and diligence within the terms of the contract with the client, incorporating our General Terms and Conditions of Business and taking account of the resources devoted to it by agreement with the client. The information contained in this report is, to the best of our knowledge, correct at the time of printing. The interpretations and recommendations are based on our experience, using reasonable professional skill and judgment, and based upon the information that was available to us. This report is confidential to the client and we accept no responsibility whatsoever to third parties to whom this report, or any part thereof, is made known. Any such party relies on the report at their own risk. EARTHTIME INC. LiberCell Building, Randall & Benson Streets, P.O. Box 1584 1000 Monrovia 10, Liberia Tel: +231-4-777557 Email: [email protected] www.earthtimegroup.com Prepared by Earthtime ii Environmental & Social Impact Assessment Buchanan Renewables Fuel Table of Contents 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENT .................................................................................................................................... III LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................................ VIII LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................................................... X EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................. XIV 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................... 26 1.1 THE ENVIRONMENTAL & SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT ...................................................................... 27 1.2 SCOPE OF WORK .................................................................................................................................... 28 2 LEGISLATIVE AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK ............................................................... 30 2.1 LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK .................................................................................................................... 30 2.2 NATIONAL ENERGY POLICY .................................................................................................................. 35 2.2.1 Key Policy Issues .......................................................................................................................... 36 2.3 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY STANDARDS ............................................................................................. 36 2.4 INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK ............................................................................................................... 36 3 DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENT ................................................................................................ 39 3.1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION .............................................................................................. 39 3.2 METEOROLOGICAL SETTING .................................................................................................................. 40 3.2.1 Precipitation ................................................................................................................................. 41 3.2.2 Temperature and Sunshine ........................................................................................................... 43 3.2.3 Wind ............................................................................................................................................. 43 3.2.3.1 Wind Direction (Robertsfield, 2000-2006) .......................................................................................... 43 3.2.3.2 Wind Speed (Robertsfield, 2000-2006) ................................................................................................ 44 3.2.4 Relative Humidity ........................................................................................................................ 44 3.3 GEOLOGICAL SETTING ........................................................................................................................... 45 3.3.1 Stratigraphy .................................................................................................................................. 45 3.4 SOIL ........................................................................................................................................................ 47 3.5 HYDROLOGY .......................................................................................................................................... 49 3.6 VEGETATION .......................................................................................................................................... 51 3.7 WETLANDS: LAGOONS, ESTUARIES, SWAMPS AND MANGROVES ........................................................ 54 3.7.1 Overview ...................................................................................................................................... 54 3.7.2 Lake Piso Wetlands ....................................................................................................................... 56 3.8 BIODIVERSITY ......................................................................................................................................... 57 3.8.1 Fauna and Flora ............................................................................................................................ 57 3.8.2 Protected Areas ............................................................................................................................. 58 3.8.2.1 Nationally Protected Areas .................................................................................................................. 58 3.8.2.2 Ramsar Wetlands of International Importance ................................................................................. 59 3.8.2.3 Key Biodiversity Areas ......................................................................................................................... 60 3.9 AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES ................................................................................................................. 65 3.9.1 Rubber........................................................................................................................................... 66 3.10 ENERGY & ELECTRICITY RESOURCES ............................................................................................... 69 Prepared by Earthtime iii Environmental & Social Impact Assessment Buchanan Renewables Fuel Table of Contents 2010 3.11 SOCIO-ECONOMICS ........................................................................................................................... 73 3.11.1 Demographics .......................................................................................................................... 73 3.11.2 Household Characteristics ....................................................................................................... 74 3.11.3 Land Use Pattern ..................................................................................................................... 75 3.11.4 Economics ................................................................................................................................ 76 3.11.5 Health Care Delivery ............................................................................................................... 76 3.11.6 Infrastructure ........................................................................................................................... 76 4 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ..................................................................................................................... 79 4.1 PROJECT LOCATION ............................................................................................................................... 82 4.2 HARVESTING PLAN ................................................................................................................................ 83 4.2.1 Corporate Concessions .................................................................................................................. 85 4.2.2 Independent Commercial Plantations ........................................................................................... 86 4.2.3 Smallholder Rubber Farms ..........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Liberia Environmental Profile
    Liberia environmental profile This report is financed by the European commission and is presented by Agreco G.E.I.E for the Government of Liberia and the European Commission. It does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the Government or the European Commission. Authors: Dr Giorgio V. Brandolini, agronomist, biodiversity expert Dr Mohammed Tigani, environmental policy and management expert (industry, water, and waste management) Monrovia, December 2006 1 List of abbreviations and acronims Acronims GoL Government of Liberia iPRS interim Poverty Reduction Strategy PRSP Poverty reduction strategy paper DDRR Disarmament, Demobilisation, Reinsertion and Reintegration NIP EDF 9 National Indicative Programme 9th EDF 9th European development fund CSP Country Strategy Paper NIP National Indicative Programme 10th EDF 10th European development fund EPA Environmental Protection Agency EIA Environmental Impact Assessment MEAs Multilateral Environmental Agreements CEP Country Environmental Profile MDG 7 Millenium development goals 7 FLEGT Eu action plan for Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade 2 Table of contents 1. Summary..................................................................................................................................... 5 2. Introduction............................................................................................................................... 10 3. State of the environment ........................................................................................................... 11 3.1
    [Show full text]
  • Mong Rethythy Investment Cambodia Oil Palm Co. Ltd. (Mricop)
    MONG RETHYTHY INVESTMENT CAMBODIA OIL PALM CO. LTD. (MRICOP) RSPO Membership No: 1-0109-11-000-00 PLANTATION MANAGEMENT UNIT MRICOP Grouping Palm Oil Mills & Estates Choeung Kor Commune, Prey Nop District, Sihanouk Province, Cambodia INTERTEK CERTIFICATION INTERNATIONAL SDN BHD (188296-W) Report No.: R9280/12-8 Mong Reththy Investment Cambodia Oil Palm Co. Ltd. Page 2 of 88 (MRICOP) Annual Surveillance Assessment ASA-01 ANNUAL SURVEILLANCE ASSESSMENT PUBLIC SUMMARY REPORT MONG RETHTHY INVESTMENT CAMBODIA OIL PALM CO. LTD. (MRICOP) RSPO Membership No: 1-0109-11-000-00 PLANTATION MANAGEMENT UNIT MRICOP Grouping Palm Oil Mills & Estates Choeung Kor Commune, Prey Nop District, Sihanouk Province, Cambodia Certificate No: RSPO 928088 Issued date: 15 Aug 2017 Expiry date: 14 Aug 2022 Assessment Type Assessment Dates Re-Certification 19-23 Jun 2017 Annual Surveillance Assessment (ASA-01) 18-22 Jun 2018 Annual Surveillance Assessment (ASA-02) Annual Surveillance Assessment (ASA-03) Annual Surveillance Assessment (ASA-04) Intertek Certification International Sdn Bhd D-28-3, Level 28, Menara Suezcap 1, No. 2, Jalan Kerinchi, Gerbang Kerinchi Lestari, 59200 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Tel: +00 (603) 7931 0032 Fax: +00 (603) 7931 0419 Email: [email protected] Website: www.intertek.com INTERTEK CERTIFICATION INTERNATIONAL SDN BHD (188296-W) Report No.: R9280/12-8 Mong Reththy Investment Cambodia Oil Palm Co. Ltd. Page 3 of 88 (MRICOP) Annual Surveillance Assessment ASA-01 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Content Page No 1.0 SCOPE OF ASSESSMENT 4 1.1
    [Show full text]
  • Reality of Triple Bottom Line
    Global Journal of Management and Business Studies. ISSN 2248-9878 Volume 3, Number 2 (2013), pp. 153-158 © Research India Publications http://www.ripublication.com/gjmbs.htm Reality of Triple Bottom Line Deepak Kumar Tripathi1, Arun Kaushal2 and Vikash Sharma3 1Management, SIT College, Sidhi, Near Collectorate Chowk, Sidhi, INDIA. 2IBM , Gla University , Mathura, INDIA. 3MBA ,Gla University, Mathura ,INDIA. Abstract In this paper we critically examine whether Triple bottom line is key to sustainability. The research paper reveals TBL is not an actual concept in modern era. it is the same concept as environmental assessment. Many authors and researchers have made an attempt to show down why the nobility is questioned. The real problem arises in maintaining a balance between these three bottom lines. when a firm start working on people and planet consideration they lose their profit share and if firm takes profit as main objective then why they should make unnecessary expenses by taking people and planet aspects because we all know that firm can get profit only if they survive for long run. The example we can take of Indian Oil Corporation limited which is investing a lot on people and planet dimension but they are not able to be in break even. On the other hand ITC is earning a lot profit and giving lot of taxes to government but are they really contributing to planet and people aspects by making tobacco products then the question arises where is sustainability aspects ,Are they really consider sustainability aspects . The second problem arises that the firm really takes this jargon as a marketing strategy to enhance their sales.
    [Show full text]
  • Nimba's Profile
    Nimba’s Profile The Flag of Nimba County: - (Valor, Purity and Fidelity reflected in the stripes) Nimba was part of the central province of Liberia which included Bong and Lofa. It became a full-fledged county in 1964 when President William V.S. Tubman changed the provinces into counties. Nimba became one of the original nine counties of Liberia. Over the years, other sub-divisions have been added making the total of 15 counties. Nimba is located in the North-East Region of the country. The size of Nimba is 4,650 square miles. In his book, Liberia Facing Mount Nimba, Dr. Nya Kwiawon Taryor, Sr. revealed that the name of the county "Nimba", originated from "Nenbaa ton" which means slippery mountain where beautiful young girls slip and fall. Mount Nimba is the highest mountain in Liberia. Nimba is the second largest county in Liberia in terms of population. Before the civil war in 1989, there were over 313,050 people in the county according to the 1984 census. Now Nimba Population has increased to 462,026. Nimba is also one of the richest in Liberia. It has the largest deposit of high grade iron ore. Other natural resources found in Nimba are gold, diamonds, timber, etc. In the late 50's, Nimba's huge iron ore reserve was exploited by LAMCO-the Liberian-American Swedish Mining Company. A considerable portion of Liberia's Gross Domestic Product, GDP, was said to have been generated from revenues from Nimba's iron ore for several years. The Flag of Nimba County: - (Valor, Purity and Fidelity reflected in the stripes) There are negotiations going on for a new contract for the iron ore in Nimba.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Social Impact Assessment?
    INDIGENOUS PEOPLES AND RESOURCE EXTRACTION IN THE ARCTIC: EVALUATING ETHICAL GUIDELINES January 2017 What is Social Impact Assessment? HIGHLIGHTS Social impact assessment (SIA) is the process of identifying and managing • SIA is used to identify and the social impacts of industrial projects. It can also be applied to manage the social impacts policies, plans and programmes. SIA is used to predict and mitigate of extractive industry negative impacts and identify opportunities to enhance benefits for local projects. The aim is to enhance positive benefits communities and broader society. Central to the principles and practice as well as to mitigate of SIA is the involvement of affected communities and other stakeholders negative effects. in the process. SIA should inform decision-making by government and companies from the early stages of a project. Equally important is the Good practice is to • role of SIA in the ongoing management of social issues throughout the integrate environmental and social assessments. whole project cycle until decommissioning and closure. As such, the Other types of assessment, social management plan that derives from an SIA is extremely important. such as cultural, health SIA is also an essential foundation for community agreements and in and human rights impact processes of free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) conducted with assessments may also be employed. indigenous communities before the start of industrial development projects. This briefing explores the core principles of SIA and the SIA • Community engagement requirements of selected international instruments. It also considers and social assessment some of the key challenges to implementing SIA in practice and offers should start as early as some recommendations for future practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberia Ndc Review – Table of Contents 1
    Activities financed in part by the Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs. LIBERIA NDC REVIEW – TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................. 4 Chapter 1: Energy Sector .................................................................................................................... 13 Energy Sector Suggested Recommendations ............................................................................... 25 Chapter 2: Waste Sector ..................................................................................................................... 29 Waste Sector Suggested Recommendations ................................................................................ 36 Chapter 3: Transport and Infrastructure Sector .................................................................................. 41 Transport and Infrastructure Sector Suggested Recommendations ............................................. 50 Chapter 4: Short-Lived Climate Pollutants Sector ................................................................................ 54 Short-Lived Climate Pollutants Sector Suggested Recommendations .......................................... 57 Chapter 5: Agriculture Sector ............................................................................................................. 59 Agriculture Sector Suggested Recommendations ........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Methods and Tools for Corporate Impact Assessment of the Millennium Development Goals (Mdgs) and Sustainable Development
    April 2013 Methods and Tools for Corporate Impact Assessment of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and Sustainable Development Helene Spitzer & André Martinuzzi ESDN Case Study N°14 European Sustainable Development Network Methods and Tools for Corporate Impact Assessment of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and Sustainable Development ESDN Case Study No 14 Authors: Helene Spitzer André Martinuzzi Contact: ESDN Office at the Institute for Managing Sustainability Vienna University of Economics and Business Welthandelsplatz 1, A-1020 Vienna, Austria Visit www.sd-network.eu for The European Sustainable Development Network (ESDN) is an informal network of Basic information on SD public administrators and other experts who Country profiles deal with sustainable development strategies Quarterly reports and policies. The network covers all 27 EU Member States, plus other European coun- Case studies tries. The ESDN is active in promoting sustain- Conference papers able development and facilitating the ex- Workshop papers change of good practices in Europe and gives Getting in touch with us advice to policy-makers at the European and national levels. © 2013 European Sustainable Development Network (ESDN) 2 Methods and Tools for Corporate Impact Assessment of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and Sustainable Development ESDN Case Study No 14 Content Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 4 1 Frameworks for social responsible
    [Show full text]
  • A Learning Guide to Social Impact Assessment for Community Health
    A Learning Guide to Social Impact Assessment for Community Health SIX STEPS TO MEASURE OUTCOMES AND DEMONSTRATE SUCCESS Kate Kohn-Parrott and Roger Panella THE GREATER DETROIT AREA HEALTH COUNCIL BINGHAM FARMS, MICHIGAN The Community Health Peer Learning (CHP) Program aims to advance progress toward population health improvements through the expanded capture, sharing, and use of electronic health data from diverse sectors. Engaging ten Participant Communities and five Subject Matter Expert (SME) communities in a peer learning collaborative, the CHP Program builds community capacity and supports the identification of data solutions, acceleration of local progress, and dissemination of best practices and lessons learned. This learning guide is part of a series developed by CHP SME communities - highlighting their practical experi- ences, noting key lessons, and sharing insights relevant to those working as part of local initiatives to improve population health. The guides are intended to inform the ongoing work of CHP Participant Communities, as well other projects supported through a rapidly growing number of place-based health improvement initiatives. While individual guides address specific topics, such as community-wide information exchange capacity building, at their core, they also tell a story of how data infrastructure development, enabled through purposeful collabora- tion, can help drive better care, smarter spending, and healthier communities. We hope you find these stories to be engaging, practical, and useful! Table of Contents
    [Show full text]
  • Food and Enterprise Development (FED) Program for Liberia Is a USAID-Funded Development Program That Was Launched in September 2011
    KIN FOOD AND ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT (FED) PROGRAM FOR LIBERIA MONTHLY REPORT: NOVEMBER 2014 Contract Number: 669-C-00-11-00047-00 VsContract Number: 669-C-00-11-00047-00 Contract Number: 669-00-11-00047-00 0 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development USAID, and prepared by DAI. Contractor: DAI Program Title: Food and Enterprise Development Program for Liberia (FED) Sponsoring USAID Office: USAID/Liberia Contractor: DAI Date of Publication: December 15, 2014 Photo Caption: Center for Agriculture Research Institute (CARI) Technician and USAID FED staff inspecting Cassava screening site in Lofa County. DISCLAIMER The authors’ views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. USAID Food and Enterprise Development Program for Liberia Monthly Report November 2014 Acronyms AEDE Agency for Economic Development and Empowerment APDRA Association Pisciculture et Development Rural en Afrique AVTP Accelerated Vocational Training Program AYP Advancing Youth Project BSTVSE Bureau of Science, Technical, Vocational and Special Education BWI Booker Washington Institute CARI Center of Agriculture Research Institute CAHW Community Animal Health Worker CBF County Based Facilitator CILSS Permanent Interstates Committee for Drought Control in the Sahel CoE Center of Excellence CYNP Community Youth Network Program DAI Development Alternatives Inc. DCOP Deputy Chief of Party ECOWAS Economic Community
    [Show full text]
  • Felda Global Ventures Holdings Berhad
    FELDA GLOBAL VENTURES HOLDINGS BERHAD RSPO Membership No: 1-0225-16-000-00 PLANTATION MANAGEMENT UNIT FGV Triang Grouping Kuantan, Pahang Darul Makmur, Malaysia INTERTEK CERTIFICATION INTERNATIONAL SDN BHD (188296-W) Report No.: R9311/17-1 Felda Global Ventures Holdings Berhad Page 2 of 70 FGV Triang Grouping: Main Assessment MAIN ASSESSMENT PUBLIC SUMMARY REPORT FELDA GLOBAL VENTURES HOLDINGS BERHAD RSPO Membership No: 1-0225-16-000-00 PLANTATION MANAGEMENT UNIT FGV Triang Grouping Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia Certificate No: RSPO 931188 Issued date: 12 June 2018 Expiry date: 11 June 2023 Assessment Type Assessment Dates Initial Certification (Main Assessment) 04 – 09 Dec 2017 Annual Surveillance Assessment (ASA-01) Annual Surveillance Assessment (ASA-02) Annual Surveillance Assessment (ASA-03) Annual Surveillance Assessment (ASA-04) Re-Certification Intertek Certification International Sdn Bhd D-28-3, Level 28, Menara Suezcap 1, No. 2, Jalan Kerinchi, Gerbang Kerinchi Lestari, 59200 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Tel: +00 (603) 7931 0032 Fax: +00 (603) 7931 0419 Email: [email protected] Website: www.intertek.com INTERTEK CERTIFICATION INTERNATIONAL SDN BHD (188296-W) Report No.: R9311/17-1 Felda Global Ventures Holdings Berhad Page 3 of 70 FGV Triang Grouping: Main Assessment TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Content Page No 1.0 SCOPE OF ASSESSMENT 4 1.1 Introduction 4 1.2 Location (address, GPS and map) mill, estates and hectarage 4 1.3 Description of supply base (fruit sources) 4 1.4 Year of plantings and cycle 5 1.5 Summary of Land Use
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    Framework Contracts beneficiaries 2009 – Lot 4 Contract 2012/284032 Evaluation of EU energy funding in Liberia and recommendations Final Report August 3rd, 2012 This project is funded by the European Union A project Implemented by MWH The content of this report is the sole responsibility of MWH and can in no ways be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. This report is prepared solely for the use and benefit of the Contracting Authority. It is the result of an independent review, and neither MWH, nor the authors accept or assume any responsibility or duty of care to any third party NAME Final report rd VERSION This version submitted on August 3 includes comments and clarifications further to the presentation of results held on July 24th 2012 in Monrovia th VERSION HISTORY - June 6 : Substantive Draft Report - May 11th 2012 : Preliminary Draft report PREPARED BY : Roger Gaillard Laurence Wilhelm FINAL REVIEW : Laurent De Block 03.08.2012 ii Contract 2012/284032 Table of Contents 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................... 12 2 CONTEXT OF THIS REPORT ................................................................................................... 20 3 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION.................................................................. 21 4 BRIEF COUNTRY CONTEXT .................................................................................................. 23 5 SECTOR CONTEXT .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Electoral District No. 1 2011 Nimba County Guinea
    Legend Nimba County " Voter Registration Center Guinea Electoral District No. 1 County Boundary 2011 Electoral District Boundary Voter Registration Centers Administrative District Boundary 33078 VRC Amalgamated Area Boundary " Name Total 33077 Code " 33081 33073 " 33032 Pledehyee Public School " 329 33072 " Whipa Two " 33079 33069 Gbloyee United Methodist Sch. 33069 " " 33080 2 ,193 33071 " 33075 33071 Small Ganta Palava Hut 936 ³ Gbuyee Two " " 33074 33072 J.W. Pearlson School 1 ,966 33073 YMCA High School 2 ,078 33076 BONG " 33074 Yini High School 1 ,641 Dingamon One 33075 Messiah Christian Academy 2 ,384 33076 Geolando Public School 3 ,004 33077 Vision International School 1 ,585 Foundation Academic Day 33078 Care & Elem School 1 ,583 Nengben Four 33132 33079 Gbartu Quarter Palava Hut 2 ,926 " 33080 Liberty Christian Institute 1 ,665 Garr-Bain 33081 Ganta Rehab Palava Hut 714 33132 George Dumber School 1 ,144 33188 " Tonglaywin One 33188 Yelekoryee Public School 270 33032 " Total Registrants (After Exhibition): 24,418 Dormah Three ED 1 Yelekoryee Five Voter registration centers have been Kpein assigned to electoral districts. Therefore, Meinpea-Mahn Leewehpea-Mahn a person is assigned to the same Whenten electoral district of the center where he or she registered. NOTE: Administrative unit boundaries shown here do not represent official endorsement by the National Elections Commission or the Government of Liberia. The final roll of registrants (after the The process for the accurate demarcation and Exhibition Exercise) is displayed. The mapping of administrative units is currently on-going. Upon completion of this process, the Government of TunuKpuyee provisional roll was utilized during the Liberia shall release the official boundaries for the delineation exercise.
    [Show full text]