Bilateral Mucopyocele of the Torus Tubarius Presenting As Headache

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Bilateral Mucopyocele of the Torus Tubarius Presenting As Headache Letters OBSERVATION ynx and are associated with local trauma, such as surgery, radiation, or neoplastic or infectious processeses.1 Given their Bilateral Mucopyocele of the Torus Tubarius natural history, bilateral acquired lesions are an exceedingly Presenting as Headache uncommon presentation.2 Cystic lesions of the nasopharynx are typically asymptom- Mucoceles are mucus-filled pseudocysts commonly oc- atic and are often discovered incidentally with imaging or en- curring in the oral cavity, including the buccal mucosa, lips, doscopic examination. The etiology of these lesions can be and tongue. The pathophysiologic mechanism relates to trauma either congenital or acquired. Acquired lesions, such as mu- of minor salivary glands allowing extravasation of mucin and coceles, salivary duct cysts, oncocytic (Warthin) cysts, intra- subsequent cyst formation.1 When infected by pathogens, mu- adenoid cysts, and abscesses, occur throughout the nasophar- coceles are referred to as mucopyoceles.3 Untreated mucopyoceles can erode soft tissue and bone Figure 1. Bilateral Nasopharyngeal Lesions Shown on T2-Weighted Axial and extend into adjacent cavities. Critical structures, such as Noncontrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging the brain and orbit, are separated from the sinuses by only a thin layer of mucosa and bone. For this reason, in patients with sinonasal mucopyocele, surgical treatment is indicated to avoid the potentially catastrophic sequelae, including spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea, orbital, and intracranial infections.4 To our knowledge, there have been no reported cases of bilateral mucopyoceles of the nasopharynx. Herein, we describe the unusual presentation and clini- cal course of a patient with refractory headaches with inci- R L dental bilateral nasopharyngeal cysts, appearing to arise from the torus tubarius on brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), later confirmed to be mucopyoceles. Report of a Case | A male veteran in his 40s with a history of post- traumatic stress disorder, traumatic brain injury, and chronic headaches presented to our clinic for evaluation after an MRI ordered for neuropsychiatric evaluation showed bilateral na- sopharyngeal lesions (Figure 1) with restricted diffusion on the diffusion weighted sequence. At presentation, the patient re- ported tension-like headaches for several months, unre- Arrowheads indicate the lesions. lieved by medical treatment. The patient had undergone a ton- Figure 2. Intraoperative Endoscopic View of the Right Nasopharynx A Endoscopic view B Suction placed C Draining after biopsy TT FoR FoR ETO TT TT NP RRR A, Endoscopic view of the right nasopharynx and an enlarged, cystic-appearing torus tubarius (TT). B, Suction is placed in the eustachian tube orifice. C, Draining purulence after biopsy was obtained. ETO indicates eustachian tube orifice; FoR, fossa of Rosenmüeller; NP, nasopharynx. jamaotolaryngology.com (Reprinted) JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery January 2016 Volume 142, Number 1 101 Copyright 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ on 10/02/2021 Letters sillectomy and adenoidectomy in childhood and had not Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported. experienced any sinonasal symptoms, radiation exposure, or Funding/Support: The project described herein was partially supported by the trauma. National Institutes of Health (NIH), grant 1TL1TR001443. Findings from a head and neck examination, including flex- Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The NIH had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; ible nasopharynolaryngoscopy, showed bilateral fullness of the preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the nasopharynx. The submucosal lesions appeared to be within manuscript for publication. the torus tubarii (Figure 2). The differential diagnoses in- Disclaimer: The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not cluded mucocele, mucopyocele, adenoidal hypertrophy, and necessarily represent the official views of the NIH. a malignant lesion. Previous Presentation: This study was a poster presentation to the American The patient was subsequently taken to the operating room, Rhinologic Society at the annual American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation Meeting; September 25, 2015; Dallas, Texas where endoscopic biopsies revealed cystic lesions filled with (Abstract 1266). purulence (Figure 2). Suspecting bilateral mucopyocele, the le- 1. Chi AC, Lambert PR III, Richardson MS, Neville BW. Oral mucoceles: sions were marsupialized using microdebrider. Results from a clinicopathologic review of 1,824 cases, including unusual variants. JOral cultures, pathologic examination, and flow cytometry stud- Maxillofac Surg. 2011;69(4):1086-1093. ies were sent for evaluation. The pathology report revealed be- 2. Ben Salem D, Duvillard C, Assous D, Ballester M, Krausé D, Ricolfi F. Imaging nign respiratory mucosa with reactive lymphoid hyperplasia of nasopharyngeal cysts and bursae. Eur Radiol. 2006;16(10):2249-2258. and mild chronic inflammation. Cultures grew Staphylococ- 3. Flint PW, Haughey BH, Lund VJ, et al. Cummings Otolaryngology, Head and cus lugdunensis, consistent with a diagnosis of mucopyocele. Neck Surgery. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier-Saunders; 2014. On discharge, the patient was prescribed nasal saline irriga- 4. Kechagias E, Georgakoulias N, Ioakimidou C, Kyriazi S, Kontogeorgos G, Seretis A. Giant intradural mucocele in a patient with adult onset seizures. Case tion and a 10-day course of sulfamethoxazole and trimetho- Rep Neurol. 2009;1(1):29-32. prim. At the 6-week follow-up, he reported resolution of his 5. Sekiya K, Watanabe M, Nadgir RN, et al. Nasopharyngeal cystic lesions: headache symptoms, and the operative site was noted to be Tornwaldt and mucous retention cysts of the nasopharynx: findings on MR healing well. imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2014;38(1):9-13. 6. Mehle ME. What do we know about rhinogenic headache? the Discussion | Nasopharyngeal cysts are a relatively common in- otolaryngologist’s challenge. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2014;47(2):255-264. cidental finding on MRI. In a recent review of 3000 random- ized MRI scans, 14% of patients showed evidence of nasopha- COMMENT & RESPONSE ryngeal cysts.5 However, the clinical significance and criteria for intervention for incidental nasopharyngeal lesions are not Caution Against Overinvestigation well established. of Small Thyroid Nodules We present a rare case of bilateral nasopharyngeal muco- To the Editor A recent study by Magister et al1 aimed to determine pyoceles discovered on MRI in a patient with chronic head- whether thyroid nodule size affected fine-needle aspiration bi- ache. The patient endorsed resolution of symptoms follow- opsy (FNAB) results and determined malignancy rates in each ing incision, drainage, and marsupialization of the lesions and Bethesda class. The authors1 found that nodules smaller than 2 antibiotic treatment. cm had increased probability of malignancy irrespective of the We suspect it is possible that even subtle infectious patho- Bethesda class and stated, “our data would suggest that smaller logic abnormalities can trigger a similar inflammatory path- thyroid nodules, as opposed to larger thyroid nodules, pose a rela- way as described herein for rhinogenic pain and manifest as tively increased risk of malignant disease and should be viewed chronic refractory headache.6 Therefore, in instances of head- with caution.”We are concerned that these results can be mis- ache refractory to medical treatment, patients should un- leading to readers and fuel the problem of overinvestigation of dergo a complete head and neck examination including en- thyroid nodules and overdiagnosis of thyroid cancer. doscopy and imaging studies, which may indicate an occult By studying a cohort of patients who had both FNAB and process. Incidental sinonasal abnormalities, like mucopyo- thyroidectomy, Magister et al1 obtained results that are bi- cele, may be clinically significant and warrant further evalu- ased to have a higher malignancy rate in smaller nodules. This ation and treatment. is because recommendations for biopsy require smaller nod- ules to have more suspicious sonographic features than larger Aria Jafari, MD nodules. For example, the Society of Radiologists in Ultra- Joseph Acevedo, BS sound recommends biopsy for solid nodules 1.5 cm or greater, Marc Lebovits, MD but the size cutoff is 1 cm for nodules with additional findings of microcalcifications, and there is no size cutoff for nodules 2 Author Affiliations: Division of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, with associated suspicious lymph nodules. The rationale for Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego (Jafari); a size cutoff is not because size predicts malignancy, as sug- School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla (Acevedo); gested by Magister et al,1 but because size affects prognosis Division of Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, Veterans Affairs if the nodule is malignant. The cohort of Magister et al1 in- Hospital, San Diego, La Jolla, California (Lebovits). cluded a biased sample of small thyroid nodules with addi- Corresponding Author: Aria Jafari, MD, University of California, San Diego, Division of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, tional suspicious features, and the standard group of larger thy- 200 W Arbor Dr, No. 8895, San Diego, CA 92103 ([email protected]). roid nodules. These results cannot be generalized to patients Published Online: November 12, 2015. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2015.2568. who receive thyroid ultrasonography in clinical practice. 102 JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery January 2016 Volume 142, Number 1 (Reprinted) jamaotolaryngology.com Copyright 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ on 10/02/2021.
Recommended publications
  • Congenital Malformations of the External and Middle Ear: High-Resolution CT Findings of Surgical Import
    71 Congenital Malformations of the External and Middle Ear: High-Resolution CT Findings of Surgical Import Joel D. Swartz1 The external auditory canal, middle ear, and bulk of the ossicular chain develop from Eric N. Faerber1 the first branchial groove, first and second branchial arches, and first pharyngeal pouch. Embryologic development of these structures is complex and only rarely are two anomalies identical. Development of the inner ear structures occurs independently of external ear structures, and concomitant involvement is unusual. This study includes 11 cases of unilateral external auditory canal atresia and two cases of bilateral atresia. Eight cases (four bilateral) of isolated congenital ossicular anomalies are also included. Emphasis is placed on findings of surgical import. All patients were studied with computed tomography only, because it was believed that the bony and soft-tissue detail achieved is superior to that with conventional multidirectional tomography. High-resolution computed tomography (CT) has emerged as the method of choice for evaluation of the temporal bone. The purpose of this study was to provide a detailed analysis of congenital aural malformations to emphasize findings deemed critical by surgeons. Materials and Methods A General Electric 8800 CT/T scanner was used in all cases. Overlapping CT sections of 1.5 mm thickness were obtained in axial and coronal projections [1]. Infants and very young children required heavy sedation or general anesthesia. If an endotracheal tube was used, a coronal view in the supine position was necessary to facilitate patient monitoring. Excellent images were obtained in all patients, usually within 40 min . All images were targeted using high-bone-detail algorithms.
    [Show full text]
  • ANATOMY of EAR Basic Ear Anatomy
    ANATOMY OF EAR Basic Ear Anatomy • Expected outcomes • To understand the hearing mechanism • To be able to identify the structures of the ear Development of Ear 1. Pinna develops from 1st & 2nd Branchial arch (Hillocks of His). Starts at 6 Weeks & is complete by 20 weeks. 2. E.A.M. develops from dorsal end of 1st branchial arch starting at 6-8 weeks and is complete by 28 weeks. 3. Middle Ear development —Malleus & Incus develop between 6-8 weeks from 1st & 2nd branchial arch. Branchial arches & Development of Ear Dev. contd---- • T.M at 28 weeks from all 3 germinal layers . • Foot plate of stapes develops from otic capsule b/w 6- 8 weeks. • Inner ear develops from otic capsule starting at 5 weeks & is complete by 25 weeks. • Development of external/middle/inner ear is independent of each other. Development of ear External Ear • It consists of - Pinna and External auditory meatus. Pinna • It is made up of fibro elastic cartilage covered by skin and connected to the surrounding parts by ligaments and muscles. • Various landmarks on the pinna are helix, antihelix, lobule, tragus, concha, scaphoid fossa and triangular fossa • Pinna has two surfaces i.e. medial or cranial surface and a lateral surface . • Cymba concha lies between crus helix and crus antihelix. It is an important landmark for mastoid antrum. Anatomy of external ear • Landmarks of pinna Anatomy of external ear • Bat-Ear is the most common congenital anomaly of pinna in which antihelix has not developed and excessive conchal cartilage is present. • Corrections of Pinna defects are done at 6 years of age.
    [Show full text]
  • Deformation of Avian Middle Ear Structures Under Static Pressure Loads, and Potential Regulation Mechanisms ⁎ Raf Claesa,B, , Pieter G.G
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Ghent University Academic Bibliography Zoology xxx (xxxx) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Zoology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/zool Deformation of avian middle ear structures under static pressure loads, and potential regulation mechanisms ⁎ Raf Claesa,b, , Pieter G.G. Muyshondtc, Joris J.J. Dirckxc, Peter Aertsa,d a University of Antwerp, Laboratory of Functional Morphology, Universiteitsplein 1, B-2610 Antwerp, Belgium b Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Pleinlaan 2, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium c University of Antwerp, Laboratory of BioMedical Physics, Groenenborgerlaan 171, B-2020 Antwerp, Belgium d University of Ghent, Department of Movement and Sport Science, Watersportlaan 2, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Static pressure changes can alter the configuration and mechanical behavior of the chain of ossicles, which may Pharyngotympanic tube affect the acoustic transfer function. In mammals, the Eustachian tube plays an important role in restoring Ambient pressure ambient middle ear pressure, hence restoring the acoustic transfer function and excluding barotrauma of the Middle ear middle and inner ear. Ambient pressure fluctuations can be potentially extreme in birds and due to the simple Chicken structure of the avian middle ear (one ossicle, one muscle), regulation of the middle ear pressure via reflexive Mallard opening of the pharyngotympanic tube appears all the
    [Show full text]
  • Organum Vestibulocochleare INTERNAL EAR MIDDLE EAR EXTERNAL EAR PETROSAL BONE- Eq EXTERNAL EAR AURICLE
    EAR organum vestibulocochleare INTERNAL EAR MIDDLE EAR EXTERNAL EAR PETROSAL BONE- Eq EXTERNAL EAR AURICLE The external ear plays the role of an acoustic antenna: auricle the auricle (together with the head) collects and focuses sound waves, the ear canal act as a resonator. tympanic membrane anular cartilage meatus acusticus externus EXTERNAL EAR EXTERNAL EAR AURICLE scutiform cartilage Auricular muscles: -Dorsal -Ventral -Rostral -Caudal EXTERNAL EAR MEATUS ACUSTICUS EXTERNUS auricular cartilage vertical canal auditory ossicles horizontal cochlea canal auditory tube tympanic tympanic eardrum bulla cavity tympanic membrane MIDDLE EAR Auditory ossicles STAPES INCUS Tympanic cavity: (anvil) (stirrup) - epitympanium - mesotympanium - hypotympanium MALLEUS (hammer) auditory vestibular window- ossicles or oval window through which mechanical stimuli (transmitted by the auditory ossicles) enter the epitympanic internal ear for translation recess into nerve impulses auditory tube (Eustachian tube) cochlear window- or round window tympanic cavity bulla tympanica through which the vibration of the perilympha is absorbed MIDDLE EAR MIDDLE EAR GUTTURAL POUCH- Eq MIDDLE EAR AUDITORY OSSICLES head INCUS processus rostralis (stirrup) STAPES processus muscularis (anvil) manubrium short crus body MALLEUS (hammer) Two muscles of the ossicles: long crus m. tensor tympani- n. tensoris tympani ex. n. base mandibularis (footplate) m. stapedius- n. stapedius ex. n. facialis crus The muscles fix the bones and protect the cochlea crus against the harmful effects
    [Show full text]
  • COVID-19 and Ear Surgery: (RK Jackler, Stanford)
    COVID-19 and Ear Surgery: (RK Jackler, Stanford) To the best of our knowledge no one knows whether the respiratory mucosal lining the middle ear and mastoid air cells system is involved by COVID19 or not – but it seems likely that they are. As the rest of the airway is involved, and the nose and nasopharynx intensely so, it seems probable that the lining of the eustachian tube, middle ear, and mastoid air cell system are all contaminated. Many articles verify the presence of respiratory virus in the middle during acute illnesses. (see list below) Two references specifically document coronavirus (not COVID-19 specific) in the middle ear during URI. These viruses have affinity for respiratory mucosa and may populate the otic structures either via direct mucosal spread or viremia. Drilling through the mastoid creates droplets and aerosols in significant clouds which, if virus is present, could risk infecting everyone in the operating room environment. As contaminated mists harbor viable virus for several hours, especially in enclosed spaces, caution is warranted. For these reasons, I think we should consider mastoidectomy to be a procedure of heightened risk. It may be relevant that infections among OR staffs following transnasal endoscopic surgery which uses powered instruments (including drills) that create plumes of droplets has been reported. Ideally, we should test for COVID-19 preoperatively for any ear surgery and, if negative, proceed with surgery using standard PPE (face shields and N95). Of course, we cannot entirely rule out early infections with undetectable viral load or even false negative testing. If positive, surgery should be delayed until the patient has cleared the disease.
    [Show full text]
  • Petubes Patient Handout.Pdf
    Division of Pediatric Otolaryngology Information on Tympanostomy Tubes Tympanostomy tubes are small plastic or metal tubes that are placed into the tympanic membrane or ear drum. How long will the tube stay in place? Tubes usually fall out of the ear in 6 months- 2 years. If they remain in longer than 2 to 3 years they are sometimes removed. What is involved with Tympanostomy tube placement? This surgery is usually done under general anesthesia. The eardrum is examined using a microscope. A small hole is made in the ear drum called a myringotomy, fluid is removed, and the tube is placed. Tube in the eardrum What medical conditions are treated with tubes? Recurrent middle ear infections or frequent acute otitis media Otitis media with effusion or fluid in middle ear associated with hearing loss Eustachian tube dysfunction causing hearing loss or eardrum structure changes What is the Eustachian tube? This is the canal that links the middle ear with the throat. This tube allows air into the middle ear and drainage of fluid. This tube grows in width and length until children are about 5 years old. Reasons that the Eustachian tube may not work properly: Viral illness, exposure to allergens or tobacco smoke may lead to swelling of the eustachian tube resulting in fluid buildup in the middle ear. Children with cleft palate and craniofacial syndromes like Down’s syndrome may have poor eustachian tube function. How will Tympanostomy tube help my child? They allow air to re-enter middle ear space They reduce the number and severity of infections They improve hearing loss cause by middle ear fluid Why is adenoidectomy sometimes done with the Tympanostomy tubes? Adenoidectomy is the removal of the adenoid tissue behind the nose.
    [Show full text]
  • Rush Eustachian Tube Surgery Program
    For more information or to refer a patient, call (312) 942-6100. Rush Eustachian Tube Surgery Program The Eustachian tube can be the breeding ground of many From Rush’s 2017 findings of Cartilage hearing issues, including infections in the middle ear (otitis Implantation for Patulous Eustachian media), fluid trapped in the middle ear (otitis media with Tubes, results showed that out of effusion), negative pressure or vacuum in the middle ear 25 participants 62% of the operated that stretches and damages the eardrum (atelectasis), and ETs had improved or completely trapping of outer ear skin in the collapsed middle ear forming a growing cyst resolved autophony at their latest (cholesteatoma). If the Eustachian tube is open all the time because it is too wide evaluation and no patients developed then disturbing symptoms of popping and voice sensitivity can occur, which is obstructive symptoms. 1 called Patulous Eustachian Tube, referred to as PET. Rush Otolaryngology’s Eustachian Tube Surgery Program progresses the of the operated diagnosis of these conditions by performing a nasal endoscopy, allowing the % ETs had improved observance of Eustachian tube swelling or narrowing, which can be seen in autophony patients with allergies, gastric reflux, or sinus diseases. Medications can be used 62 initially to decrease Eustachian tube narrowing, but if medical treatment is not successful then surgical widening of the tube may be beneficial. Eustachian Tube Balloon Dilation. To help restore function to a narrow or blocked Eustachian tube the surgeon can place a specially made balloon in the opening of the Eustachian tube and inflate it for a short time, which stretches the opening to a more normal size.
    [Show full text]
  • Interventions for Adult Eustachian Tube Dysfunction: a Systematic Review
    HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT VOLUME 18 ISSUE 46 JULY 2014 ISSN 1366-5278 Interventions for adult Eustachian tube dysfunction: a systematic review Alexis Llewellyn, Gill Norman, Melissa Harden, Andrew Coatesworth, Daniel Kimberling, Anne Schilder and Catriona McDaid DOI 10.3310/hta18460 Interventions for adult Eustachian tube dysfunction: a systematic review Alexis Llewellyn,1 Gill Norman,1 Melissa Harden,1 Andrew Coatesworth,2 Daniel Kimberling,3 Anne Schilder4 and Catriona McDaid1* 1Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK 2Ear, Nose and Throat Department, York Hospital, York, UK 3Gale Farm Surgery, York, UK 4evidENT University College London Ear Institute, Royal National Throat, Nose and Ear Hospital University College London, London, UK *Corresponding author Declared competing interests of authors: none Published July 2014 DOI: 10.3310/hta18460 This report should be referenced as follows: Llewellyn A, Norman G, Harden M, Coatesworth A, Kimberling D, Schilder A, et al. Interventions for adult Eustachian tube dysfunction: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess 2014;18(46). Health Technology Assessment is indexed and abstracted in Index Medicus/MEDLINE, Excerpta Medica/EMBASE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch®) and Current Contents®/ Clinical Medicine. Health Technology Assessment NICE TAR and DAR ISSN 1366-5278 (Print) ISSN 2046-4924 (Online) Five-year impact factor: 5.804 Health Technology Assessment is indexed in MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library and the ISI Science Citation Index and is assessed for inclusion in the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects. This journal is a member of and subscribes to the principles of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) (www.publicationethics.org/).
    [Show full text]
  • THE OSSIFICATION of the MIDDLE and INTERNAL EAR of the GOLDEN HAMSTER (Cricetus Auratus)
    THE OSSIFICATION OF THE MIDDLE AND INTERNAL EAR OF THE GOLDEN HAMSTER (Cricetus auratus) WILLIAM CAMPBELL VAN ARSDEL III A THESIS submitted to OREGON STATE COLLEGE in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE June 1951 Redacted for privacy Assistant Professor of Zoo10 In Charge of Major Redacted for privacy Head of Department of Zoolor Redacted for privacy Chair!nan of School Graduate Conittee Redacted for privacy Dean of Graduate School Date thesis is presented / If7 Typed by Mary Adams ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I wish to express my appreciation to Dr. Howard H. Hillemann for suggesting this problem and for the generous amount of time and valuable guidance which he has given during the period of this study. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction ................................................. i Materials and Methods ......................................... 2 Observations ................................................. 2 Malleus: Ossification .................................. 2 Malleus: Anatomy ....................................... 5 Mafleus: Ossiculum accessoriurn mallei .................. 6 Incus: Ossification .................................... 7 Incus: Anatomy ......................................... 8 Stapes: Ossification ................................... 8 Stapes: Anatomy ........................................ 9 Ectotympanic: Ossification and Derivatives ............ 10 Internal ear: Ossification ............................. 12 Hyold arch elements associated with the ear ............. 15 Table
    [Show full text]
  • The Eustachian Tube – Function and Dysfunction
    ENT and Allergy Associates Leslie R. Berghash, M.D., F.A.C.S. Of Florida John T. Lanza, M.D., F.A.C.S. Caring For Our Patients Since 1963 Camysha H. Wright, M.D., F.A.A.O.A. www.entaaf.com THE EUSTACHIAN TUBE – FUNCTION AND DYSFUNCTION The eustachian tube is a narrow, one and a half inch long channel connecting the middle ear with the nasopharynx, the upper throat area just above the palate, in back of the nose. The eustachian tube functions as a pressure equalizing valve for the middle ear which is normally filled with air. When functioning properly the eustachian tube opens for a fraction of a second periodically (about once every three minutes) in response to swallowing or yawning. In doing so it allows air into the middle ear to replace air that has been absorbed by the middle ear lining (mucous membrane) or to equalize pressure changes occurring on altitude changes. Anything that interferes with this periodic opening and closing of the eustachian tube may result in hearing impairment or other ear symptoms. Obstruction or blockage of the eustachian tube results in a negative middle ear pressure, with retraction (sucking in) of the eardrum membrane. In the adult this is usually accompanied by some ear discomfort, a fullness or pressure feeling and may result in a mild hearing impairment and head noise (tinnitus). There may be no symptoms in children. If the obstruction is prolonged the fluid may be drawn from the mucous membrane of the middle ear creating a condition we call serous otitis media (fluid in the middle ear).
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign Body in the Eustachian Tube: a Challenging Diagnosis and Management
    Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2021 Turkish Archives of Otorhinolaryngology 142 Foreign Body in the Eustachian Tube: A Challenging Diagnosis and Management Case Report Catarina Rato, Gustavo Lopes, Delfim Duarte, Nuno Oliveira Department of Otorhinolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital Pedro Hispano, Matosinhos, Portugal Abstract Foreign bodies in the external ear are very common. The same cannot be said about foreign bodies in the Eustachian tube (ET). We report the case of a 63-year-old woman with a history of painless left side otorrhea and hearing loss. She reported a left ear surgery when she was 30-year-old but she did not know the diagnosis that was made at that time neither the kind of surgery performed. Otoscopic examination revealed an inferior perforation of the eardrum. Audiologic evaluation demonstrated a unilateral, moderate-severe mixed hearing loss. Computed tomography scan showed, in left ear, a soft tissue density filling the middle ear cavity and a foreign body in ET. The patient underwent middle ear exploration which required endoscopic assistance to visualize and remove the foreign body. It appeared to be a stapes prothesis of Robinson type. The displacement of a stapes prosthesis to the ET has not been reported in the literature. Surgeries in this region are challenging. This case highlights the importance of the integration of endoscopy into otologic surgery. Keywords: Eustachian tube, foreign body, stapes surgery, endoscopy, middle ear, otosclerosis ORCID ID of the authors: C.R. 0000-0002-0454-5759; G.L. 0000-0003-2954-0281; D.D. 0000-0002-2160-1599; N.O. 0000-0002-1726-5991.
    [Show full text]
  • Eustachian Tube Dysfunction in Patients with House Dust Mite
    Ma et al. Clin Transl Allergy (2020) 10:30 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13601-020-00328-9 Clinical and Translational Allergy RESEARCH Open Access Eustachian tube dysfunction in patients with house dust mite-allergic rhinitis Yun Ma† , Maojin Liang†, Peng Tian, Xiang Liu, Hua Dang, Qiujian Chen, Hua Zou* and Yiqing Zheng* Abstract Background: One of the important pathogeneses of eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD) is nasal infammatory disease. The prevalence of allergic rhinitis (AR) in adults ranges from 10 to 30% worldwide. However, research on the status of eustachian tubes in AR patients is still very limited. Methods: This prospective controlled cross-sectional study recruited 59 volunteers and 59 patients with AR from Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital. Visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for AR symptoms and seven-item Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire (ETDQ-7) scores were collected for both groups. Nasal endoscopy, tympanography and eustachian tube pressure measurement (tubomanometry, TMM) were used for objective assessment. All AR patients underwent 1 month of treatment with mometasone furoate nasal spray and oral loratadine. Then, the nasal condition and eustachian tube status were again evaluated. Results: TMM examination revealed that 22 patients (39 ears, 33.1%) among the AR patients and 5 healthy controls (7 ears, 5.9%) had abnormal eustachian pressure. Twenty-two AR patients (37.3%) and 9 healthy controls had an ETDQ-7 score 15. With regard to nasal symptoms of AR, the VAS scores of nasal obstruction were correlated with the ETDQ-7 scores,≥ and the correlation coefcient was r 0.5124 (p < 0.0001). Nasal endoscopic scores were also positively cor- related with ETDQ-7 scores, with a correlation= coefcient of 0.7328 (p < 0.0001).
    [Show full text]