From UNIQUAC to Modified UNIFAC Dortmund: a Discussion

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

From UNIQUAC to Modified UNIFAC Dortmund: a Discussion 3rd International Conference on Medical Sciences and Chemical Engineering (ICMSCE'2013) Dec. 25-26, 2013 Bangkok (Thailand) From UNIQUAC to Modified UNIFAC Dortmund: A Discussion Edison Muzenda the excess Helmholtz energy of mixing (at constant Abstract—This paper reviews and discusses the universal quasi – temperature and volume) [1]. This hypothesis leads to the chemical theory and group contribution methods focusing on their generalised excess Gibbs energy UNIQUAC expression as application in phase equilibrium modeling and computation. The defined in (1). historical perspective, algorithm, strength, weaknesses and E E E E limitations are presented. The paper concludes with comparison of a g g g (1) the performance of the various UNIFAC models. RT RT RT RT TV, TP, C R Keywords—Gibbs energy, Group contribution, phase The UNIQUAC equation is described in terms of the equilibrium, quasi –chemical, UNIFAC. combinatorial and residual terms. The combinatorial term is used to describe the dominant entropic contribution. It uses I. UNIVERSAL QUASI-CHEMICAL (UNIQUAC) EQUATION only pure-component data and is determined only by the size, HE UNIQUAC equation was developed by Abrams and shape and composition of the molecules in the mixture [2]. For T Prausnitz in 1975, and is based primarily on binary mixtures the excess Gibbs energy expression of the Guggenheim’s quasi-chemical lattice model developed in 1952 combinatorial term is [1]. Guggenheim postulated that a liquid can be represented by g E a three-dimensional lattice with lattice sites spaced equidistant 1 2 x1 ln x2 ln from each other. A volume, known as a cell, exists in the RT C x1 x2 immediate vicinity of each lattice site. Each molecule in the z liquid is divided into attached segments, and each segment 1 2 (2) q1 x 1 ln q2 x 2 ln occupies one cell. The total number of cells is then considered 2 1 2 to be equal to the total number of segments [1]. In its original The residual term is used to describe the intermolecular form, Guggenheim’s lattice model was restricted to describing forces responsible for the enthalpy of mixing. Thus the two only small molecules which were essentially the same size. adjustable binary interaction parameters appear only in the Abrams and Prausnitz however managed successfully to residual term [2]. For binary mixtures the residual term is extend Guggenheim’s lattice theory to mixtures containing described in terms of excess Gibbs energy as in (3). molecules of different size and shape by incorporating and E adapting Wilson’s local-composition model into g q1 x 1ln 1 2 21 q2 x 2ln 2 1 12 (3) Guggenheim’s lattice model [1]. RT R The average segment fraction (Φi) is only used in the A. Mixing Theory calculation of the combinatorial term. For a binary mixture, it The effects of volume on mixtures of nonelectrolyte liquids is defined mathematically as at constant temperature and constant pressure (remote from x r 1 1 (4) critical conditions) are minimal. However, Scatchard (1937) 1 x1 r 1 x 2 r 2 demonstrated that even minor volume changes can and significantly affect the entropy- and enthalpy of mixing. Fortunately these effects are largely nullified in the excess x2 r 2 2 (5) Gibbs energy. Therefore, for mixtures of non-electrolyte x1 r 1 x 2 r 2 liquids at low or modest pressures, Hildebrand and Scott The average area fraction is used in both the combinatorial (1950) proposed that the excess Gibbs energy of mixing (at and residual terms. When using the empirical adjustment of the constant temperature and pressure) is approximately equal to (q'i) parameters, as defined by Anderson [3], the average area fraction should be similarly depicted as (θ'i). For a binary E. Muzenda is with the Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment, University of Johannesburg, mixture, the average area fraction is defined as in (6) Doornfontein, Johannesburg 2028; phone: 0027-11-5596817; Fax: 0027-11- 5596430; e-mail: [email protected]). 32 3rd International Conference on Medical Sciences and Chemical Engineering (ICMSCE'2013) Dec. 25-26, 2013 Bangkok (Thailand) x1 q 1 x1 q' 1 ri Vwi 15.17 (14) 1 or 1 (6) x q x q x q'' x q 9 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 qi Awi 5.2 10 (15) and x2 q 2 x2 q' 2 2 or 2 C. Binary Adjustable Parameters (τij) x1 q 1 x 2 q 2 x1 q'' 1 x 2 q 2 The binary adjustable parameters (τij) contain the characteristic interaction energy parameters (uij) which represent average intermolecular energies, since in a given B. Pure-component Structural Parameters molecule the segments are not necessarily chemically identical In terms of lattice theory, each molecule of component (i) [1]. These in turn relate to the UNIQUAC binary interaction consists of a set of bonded segments occupying a set volume parameters (aij) as shown in (16). (parameter r1). In terms of component (i), parameter (ri) is the u a exp 12 exp 12 (16) van der Waals molecular volume relative to that of a standard 12 RT T segment [1] and is expressed as and ri Vwi V ws (7) u21 a21 In (7), (Vwi) is the van der Waals volume of molecule (i) as exp exp (17) 21 RT T published by Bondi in 1968, and (Vws) is the van der Waals volume of a standard segment. The volume for a standard The parameters (aij) are determined from binary sphere in terms of its radius (Rws) is as in (8) experimental data [3], sourced mainly from VLE data (P, y, x ) VR 4 3 ³ (8) at constant temperature, VLE data (T, y, x ) at constant ws ws pressure and total pressure data (P, x or y ) at constant The UNIQUAC arbitrarily defines a standard segment as a temperature. The UNIQUAC can be used to calculate activity sphere which satisfies (9) for a linear polymethylene molecule coefficients for a binary mixture according to (18) and (19). of infinite length z r z r q r 1 (9) ln x ln 1 q ln 1 l 1 l 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 x1 2 1 r2 Numerical results are insensitive to the value of the lattice co-ordination number (z) provided a reasonable number q ln q 21 12 (18) between 6 and 12 is selected. The lattice co-ordination number 1 1 2 21 2 1 is thus arbitrarily set equal to 10. Segments differ in terms of 1 2 21 2 1 12 and their external contact area (parameter q1) for example the CH3 molecules of pentane have a larger exposed external area than z r ln x ln 2 q ln 2 l 2 l the CH2 molecules, but the central carbon of neopentane has 2 1 2 2 2 1 x2 2 2 r1 no external contact area at all. Parameter (qi) is referred to as the van der Waals molecular area relative to that of a standard 12 21 segment [1] and is defined as q ln q (19) 2 2 1 12 1 2 q A A (10) 2 1 12 1 2 21 i wi ws The pure-component parameters (l ) and (l ) are determined In (10), (A ) is the van der Waals surface area of molecule 1 2 wi as in (20) and (21) (i) as published by Bondi in 1968, and (Aws) is the van der Waals surface area of a standard segment, described in (9). z l1 r1 q 1 r 1 1 (20) The area of a standard sphere in terms of its radius (Rws) is 2 provided as z l2 r2 q 2 r 2 1 (21) ARws 4 ws ² (11) 2 Bondi stipulated that van der Waals volume and area of an Strengths n-mer of polymethylene are n times the volume and area of a The UNIQUAC model gives reliable estimates of both methylene group: vapour-liquid and liquid-liquid equilibria for binary and multi- component mixtures containing a variety of non-electrolyte Vwi n10.23 cm /³ mole (12) polar or non-polar mixtures [2]. 9 Awi n.1 35 10 cm /² mole (13) The UNIQUAC model uses only two adjustable parameters Substituting (7), (8) and (10), (11) and (12), (13) into (9) per binary. This makes the equation simpler to use for multi- 15 with (Rws) being fixed at 10.95 × 10 cm/mole as n tends to component mixtures [2]. infinity, yields the following expressions for the parameters (ri) The UNIQUAC model can yield adequate results even when and (qi): available experimental data is limited. 33 3rd International Conference on Medical Sciences and Chemical Engineering (ICMSCE'2013) Dec. 25-26, 2013 Bangkok (Thailand) Weaknesses applicable predictive model based on regular solution theory Molecular-dynamic calculations have shown that [7], using pure-component data. However, the greatest UNIQUAC often over-rectifies the deviations for random weakness of regular solution theory was that it could not be mixing because the magnitudes of the arguments of the applied to polar systems and this was addressed with the Boltzmann factors are too large. Thus UNIQUAC is often not introduction of the ASOG model in 1969. as accurate as NRTL for LLE calculations, and Wilson for VLE calculations. B. Solution of Groups Concept Whilst thousands of chemical compounds exist, the number II. GROUP CONTRIBUTION METHODS of functional groups which constitute these compounds is much smaller. It is therefore convenient to correlate the Reliable phase equilibrium data is essential for optimum properties of the large number of chemical compounds in separation process synthesis, design and operation.
Recommended publications
  • Selection of Thermodynamic Methods
    P & I Design Ltd Process Instrumentation Consultancy & Design 2 Reed Street, Gladstone Industrial Estate, Thornaby, TS17 7AF, United Kingdom. Tel. +44 (0) 1642 617444 Fax. +44 (0) 1642 616447 Web Site: www.pidesign.co.uk PROCESS MODELLING SELECTION OF THERMODYNAMIC METHODS by John E. Edwards [email protected] MNL031B 10/08 PAGE 1 OF 38 Process Modelling Selection of Thermodynamic Methods Contents 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Thermodynamic Fundamentals 2.1 Thermodynamic Energies 2.2 Gibbs Phase Rule 2.3 Enthalpy 2.4 Thermodynamics of Real Processes 3.0 System Phases 3.1 Single Phase Gas 3.2 Liquid Phase 3.3 Vapour liquid equilibrium 4.0 Chemical Reactions 4.1 Reaction Chemistry 4.2 Reaction Chemistry Applied 5.0 Summary Appendices I Enthalpy Calculations in CHEMCAD II Thermodynamic Model Synopsis – Vapor Liquid Equilibrium III Thermodynamic Model Selection – Application Tables IV K Model – Henry’s Law Review V Inert Gases and Infinitely Dilute Solutions VI Post Combustion Carbon Capture Thermodynamics VII Thermodynamic Guidance Note VIII Prediction of Physical Properties Figures 1 Ideal Solution Txy Diagram 2 Enthalpy Isobar 3 Thermodynamic Phases 4 van der Waals Equation of State 5 Relative Volatility in VLE Diagram 6 Azeotrope γ Value in VLE Diagram 7 VLE Diagram and Convergence Effects 8 CHEMCAD K and H Values Wizard 9 Thermodynamic Model Decision Tree 10 K Value and Enthalpy Models Selection Basis PAGE 2 OF 38 MNL 031B Issued November 2008, Prepared by J.E.Edwards of P & I Design Ltd, Teesside, UK www.pidesign.co.uk Process Modelling Selection of Thermodynamic Methods References 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of UNIFAC Group Interaction Parameters Usijng Properties Based on Quantum Mechanical Calculations Hansan Kim New Jersey Institute of Technology
    New Jersey Institute of Technology Digital Commons @ NJIT Theses Theses and Dissertations Spring 2005 Evaluation of UNIFAC group interaction parameters usijng properties based on quantum mechanical calculations Hansan Kim New Jersey Institute of Technology Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.njit.edu/theses Part of the Chemical Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Kim, Hansan, "Evaluation of UNIFAC group interaction parameters usijng properties based on quantum mechanical calculations" (2005). Theses. 479. https://digitalcommons.njit.edu/theses/479 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Digital Commons @ NJIT. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ NJIT. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Copyright Warning & Restrictions The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specified conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a, user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of “fair use” that user may be liable for copyright infringement, This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying
    [Show full text]
  • Prediction of Solubility of Amino Acids Based on Cosmo Calculaition
    PREDICTION OF SOLUBILITY OF AMINO ACIDS BASED ON COSMO CALCULAITION by Kaiyu Li A dissertation submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirement for the degree of Master of Science in Engineering Baltimore, Maryland October 2019 Abstract In order to maximize the concentration of amino acids in the culture, we need to obtain solubility of amino acid as a function of concentration of other components in the solution. This function can be obtained by calculating the activity coefficient along with solubility model. The activity coefficient of the amino acid can be calculated by UNIFAC. Due to the wide range of applications of UNIFAC, the prediction of the activity coefficient of amino acids is not very accurate. So we want to fit the parameters specific to amino acids based on the UNIFAC framework and existing solubility data. Due to the lack of solubility of amino acids in the multi-system, some interaction parameters are not available. COSMO is a widely used way to describe pairwise interactions in the solutions in the chemical industry. After suitable assumptions COSMO can calculate the pairwise interactions in the solutions, and largely reduce the complexion of quantum chemical calculation. In this paper, a method combining quantum chemistry and COSMO calculation is designed to accurately predict the solubility of amino acids in multi-component solutions in the ii absence of parameters, as a supplement to experimental data. Primary Reader and Advisor: Marc D. Donohue Secondary Reader: Gregory Aranovich iii Contents
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling of Activity Coefficients Using Computational
    Modelling of activity coefficents by comp. chem. 1 Modelling of activity coefficients using computational chemistry Eirik Falck da Silva Report in DIK 2099 Faselikevekter June 2002 Modelling of activity coefficents by comp. chem. 2 SUMMARY ......................................................................................................3 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................3 background .............................................................................................................................................3 The use of computational chemistry .....................................................................................................4 REVIEW...........................................................................................................4 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................4 Free energy of solvation .........................................................................................................................5 Cosmo-RS ............................................................................................................................................7 SMx models..........................................................................................................................................7 Application of infinite dilution solvation energy..................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Dortmund Data Bank Retrieval, Display, Plot, and Calculation
    Dortmund Data Bank Retrieval, Display, Plot, and Calculation Tutorial and Documentation DDBSP – Dortmund Data Bank Software Package DDBST - Dortmund Data Bank Software & Separation Technology GmbH Marie-Curie-Straße 10 D-26129 Oldenburg Tel.: +49 441 361819 0 [email protected] www.ddbst.com DDBSP – Dortmund Data Bank Software Package 2019 Content 1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................................................................6 1.1 The XDDB (Extended Data)..................................................................................................................................7 2 Starting the Dortmund Data Bank Retrieval Program....................................................................................................8 3 Searching.......................................................................................................................................................................10 3.1 Building a Simple Systems Query........................................................................................................................10 3.2 Building a Query with Component Lists..............................................................................................................11 3.3 Examining Further Query List Functionality.......................................................................................................11 3.4 Import Aspen Components...................................................................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 4. Thermodynamics [Ch. 2]
    Lecture 4. Thermodynamics [Ch. 2] • Energy, Entropy, and Availability Balances • Phase Equilibria - Fugacities and activity coefficients -K-values • Nonideal Thermodynamic Property Models - P-v-T equation-of-state models - Activity coefficient models • Selecting an Appropriate Model Thermodynamic Properties • Importance of thermodyyppnamic properties and equations in separation operations – Energy requirements (heat and work) – Phase equilibria : Separation limit – Equipment sizing • Property estimation – Specific volume, enthalpy, entropy, availability, fugacity, activity, etc. – Used for design calculations . Separator size and layout . AiliAuxiliary components : PiPipi ing, pumps, va lves, etc. EnergyEnergy,, Entropy and Availability Balances Heat transfer in and out Q ,T Q ,T in s out s OfdOne or more feed streams flowing into the system are … … separated into two or more prodttduct streams thtflthat flow Streams in out of the system. n,zi ,T,P,h,s,b,v : Separation : : : process n Molar flow rate : (system) : z Mole fraction Sirr , LW Streams out T Temperature n,zi ,T,P,h,s,b,v P Pressure h Molar enthalpy … … (Surroundings) s Molar entropy T b Molar availability 0 (W ) (W ) s in s out v Specific volume Shaft work in and out Energy Balance • Continuous and steady-state flow system • Kinetic, potential, and surface energy changes are neglected • First law of thermodynamics (conservation of energy) (stream enthalpy flows + heat transfer + shaft work)leaving system - (t(stream en thlthalpy flows +h+ hea ttt trans fer + s hfthaft wor k)entering
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction of Cosmotherm and Its Ability to Predict Infinite Dilution
    This is a postprint of Industrial & engineering chemistry research, 42(15), 3635-3641. The original version of the paper can be found under http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ie020974v Prediction of Infinite Dilution Activity Coefficients using COSMO-RS R. Putnam1, R. Taylor1,2, A. Klamt3, F. Eckert3, and M. Schiller4 1Department of Chemical Engineering, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY 13699-5705, USA 2Department of Chemical Engineering, Universiteit Twente, Postbus 217 7500 AE Enschede The Netherlands 3COSMOlogic GmbH&Co.KG Burscheider Str. 515 51381 Leverkusen Germany 4 E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company DuPont Engineering Technology 1007 Market Street Wilmington, DE 19808, USA Abstract Infinite dilution activity coefficients (IDACs) are important characteristics of mixtures because of their ability to predict operating behavior in distillation processes. Thermodynamic models are used to predict IDACs since experimental data can be difficult and costly to obtain. The models most often employed for predictive purposes are the Original and Modified UNIFAC Group Contribution Methods (GCMs). COSMO-RS (COnductor-like Screening MOdel for Real Solvents) is an alternative predictive method for a wide variety of systems that requires a limited minimum number of input parameters. A significant difference between GCMs and COSMO- RS is that a given GCMs’ predictive ability is dependent on the availability of group interaction parameters, whereas COSMO-RS is only limited by the availability of individual component parameters. In this study COSMO-RS was used to predict infinite dilution activity coefficients. The database assembled by, and calculations with various UNIFAC models carried out by Voutsas et al. (1996) were used as the basis for this comparison.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of UNIFAC Group Interaction Parameters Usijng
    Copyright Warning & Restrictions The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specified conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a, user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of “fair use” that user may be liable for copyright infringement, This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law. Please Note: The author retains the copyright while the New Jersey Institute of Technology reserves the right to distribute this thesis or dissertation Printing note: If you do not wish to print this page, then select “Pages from: first page # to: last page #” on the print dialog screen The Van Houten library has removed some of the personal information and all signatures from the approval page and biographical sketches of theses and dissertations in order to protect the identity of NJIT graduates and faculty. ABSTRACT EVALUATION OF UNIFAC GROUP INTERACTION PARAMETERS USING PROPERTIES BASED ON QUANTUM MECHANICAL CALCULATIONS by Hansan Kim Crrnt rp-ntrbtn thd h ASOG nd UIAC r dl d fr pprxt ttn f xtr bhvr bt nbl t dtnh btn r At n Mll (AIM thr n lv th
    [Show full text]
  • Vapor Liquid Equilibria: a Review Maya B
    Sci. Revs. Chem. Commun.: 2(2), 2012, 158-171 ISSN 2277-2669 VAPOR LIQUID EQUILIBRIA: A REVIEW MAYA B. MANE* and S. N. SHINDE Master Student in Chemical Engineering, Chemical Engineering Department, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed University, College of Engineering, PUNE (M.S.) INDIA (Received : 30.05.2012; Revised : 03.06.2012; Accepted : 04.06.2012) ABSTRACT Vapor-liquid equilibrium data may be readily evaluated and extended when they are calculated as activity coefficients. The equations proposed by Van Laar, Margulas, Wilson, NRTL and UNIQUAC, which express the activity coefficients of the components of a mixture as functions of the liquid composition and empirical constants, are capable of fitting most of the available vapor liquid equilibrium data. Equations of state play an important role in chemical engineering design and they have assumed an expanding role in the study of the phase equilibria of fluids and fluid mixtures. Key words: VLE, Van Laar, Margulas, Wilson, NRTL, UNIQUAC, Equation of States. INTRODUCTION The term “Vapor-Liquid Equilibrium (VLE)” refers to systems in which a single liquid phase is in equilibrium with its vapor, schematic diagram of the vapor-liquid equilibrium is illustrated in Fig. 1. In studies of phase equilibrium, however, the phase containing gradients is not considered. Wherever gradients exist there is a tendency for change with time; hence there is no equilibrium. On the other hand, there can be two or more phases, each of which is homogenous throughout, with no tendency for any change in properties with time, even though the phases are in intimate physical contact with one another.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Article Application of COSMO-RS Method for the Prediction of Liquid-Liquid Equilibrium of Water/N-Dodecane/1-Butanol
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation ISRN ermodynamics Volume 2014, Article ID 415732, 6 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/415732 Research Article Application of COSMO-RS Method for the Prediction of Liquid-Liquid Equilibrium of Water/n-Dodecane/1-Butanol S. Balasubramonian, Shekhar Kumar, D. Sivakumar, and U. Kamachi Mudali Reprocessing R&D Division, Reprocessing Group, Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research, Kalpakkam 603102, India Correspondence should be addressed to Shekhar Kumar; [email protected] Received 2 December 2013; Accepted 19 December 2013; Published 5 February 2014 Academic Editors: G. L. Aranovich and F. Mart´ınez Copyright © 2014 S. Balasubramonian et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The liquid-liquid equilibrium (LLE) for the system water-dodecane-butanol was estimated using the UNIQUAC model. Inthe UNIQUAC model interaction parameters were estimated from the vapor-liquid equilibrium (VLE) and LLE data of their constituent binary pairs. The water-dodecane-butanol LLE was experimentally measured at 298.15 K. Phase stability constraints were taken into account while calculating the binary interaction parameters from the mutual solubility data. The COSMO-RS method was used to estimate the activity coefficient in the miscible binary pair. The ternary LLE composition was predicted using the experimental VLE data as well as using the COSMO-RS calculated activity coefficient data along with the experimental mutual solubility data. In the latter case the root mean square deviation (RMSD) for the distribution of butanol between aqueous and organic phase is 0.24%.
    [Show full text]
  • Simulation Study on the Influence of Gas Mole Fraction and Aqueous
    processes Article Simulation Study on the Influence of Gas Mole Fraction and Aqueous Activity under Phase Equilibrium Weilong Zhao 1, Hao Wu 1, Jing Wen 2, Xin Guo 1, Yongsheng Zhang 1,* and Ruirui Wang 2 1 Henan Province Engineering Laboratory for Eco-architecture and the Built Environment, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454000, China; [email protected] (W.Z.); [email protected] (H.W.); [email protected] (X.G.) 2 School of Mechanical and Power Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454000, China; [email protected] (J.W.); [email protected] (R.W.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.:+86-183-368-63941 Received: 28 December 2018; Accepted: 17 January 2019; Published: 22 January 2019 Abstract: This work explored the influence of gas mole fraction and activity in aqueous phase while predicting phase equilibrium conditions. In pure gas systems, such as CH4, CO2,N2 and O2, the gas mole fraction in aqueous phase as one of phase equilibrium conditions was proposed, and a simplified correlation of the gas mole fraction was established. The gas mole fraction threshold maintaining three-phase equilibrium was obtained by phase equilibrium data regression. The UNIFAC model, the predictive Soave-Redlich-Kwong equation and the Chen-Guo model were used to calculate aqueous phase activity, the fugacity of gas and hydrate phase, respectively. It showed that the predicted phase equilibrium pressures are in good agreement with published phase equilibrium experiment data, and the percentage of Absolute Average Deviation Pressures are given. The water activity, gas mole fraction in aqueous phase and the fugacity coefficient in vapor phase are discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Modified UNIFAC-LLE Group-Interaction Parameters for the Prediction of Gasoline-Ethanol- Water Equilibria Jason A
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by DigitalCommons@WPI Worcester Polytechnic Institute Digital WPI Masters Theses (All Theses, All Years) Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2008-04-29 Modified UNIFAC-LLE Group-Interaction Parameters for the Prediction of Gasoline-Ethanol- Water Equilibria Jason A. Lewandowski Worcester Polytechnic Institute Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.wpi.edu/etd-theses Repository Citation Lewandowski, Jason A., "Modified UNIFAC-LLE Group-Interaction Parameters for the Prediction of Gasoline-Ethanol-Water Equilibria" (2008). Masters Theses (All Theses, All Years). 461. https://digitalcommons.wpi.edu/etd-theses/461 This thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Digital WPI. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses (All Theses, All Years) by an authorized administrator of Digital WPI. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Modified UNIFAC-LLE Group-Interaction Parameters for the Prediction of Gasoline-Ethanol-Water Equilibria By Jason Andrew Lewandowski A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE In partial fulfillment of the requirement for the Degree of Master of Science In Environmental Engineering By _____________________________ April 2008 APPROVED: __________________________________________ Professor John Bergendahl, Major Advisor __________________________________________ Professor James C. O’Shaughnessy, Co-Advisor __________________________________________ Professor Tahar El-Korchi, Head of Department ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The research was completed using the facilities provided by Worcester Polytechnic Institute’s Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. I would like to thank Worcester Polytechnic Institute’s Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering for supporting me with a teaching assistantship.
    [Show full text]