DOCSLIB.ORG

Post Election Analysis (2)” of the Frederick T

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The original documents are located in Box 50, folder “ Post Election Analysis (2)” of the Frederick T. Steeper Papers at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Gerald R. Ford donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Digitized from Box 50 of the Frederick T. Steeper Papers at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library Historical Summary of General Election Exit Polls: Presidential Elections: 1992 and 1996 GOP Vote Subgroup CBS/NYT 1992 GOP Vote 1992 GOP Margin VNS 1996 1996 GOP Margin Total 100 38 -5 100 41 -8 Men 47 38 -3 48 44 1 Women 53 37 -8 52 38 -16 Whites 87 40 1 83 46 3 Blacks 8 10 -73 10 12 -72 Hispanics 2 25 -36 5 21 -51 ~ White men 48 1 40 3 48 7 49 Ji' 11 White women 52 • 41 0 52 • 43 - f' -5 18-29 21 34 -9 17 34 -19 30-44 36 38 -3 33 41 -7 45-59 23 40 -1 26 41 -7 60 and older 20 38 -12 24 44 -4 18-64 87 37 -6 84 40 -9 65 and older 13 39 -11 16 43 -7 Men, 18-29 17 38 -9 Men, 30-44 33 46 5 Men, 45-59 27 43 -1 Men, 60 and older 24 48 5 Women, 18-29 17 31 -27 Women, 30-44 33 37 -17 Women, 45-59 26 40 -12 Women, 60 and older 23 41 -12 Family income < $15K 14 23 -35 11 28 -31 $15K-$29,999 24 35 -10 23 36 -17 $30K-$49,999 30 38 -3 27 40 -8 $50K-$74,999 20 41 1 21 45 -2 $75,000-$99,999 9 48 4 12 48 12 Over $100,000 9 54 16 Not a HS grad 7 28 -26 6 28 -31 HS grad 25 36 -7 24 35 -16 Some college 29 37 -4 27 40 -8 College graduate 23 41 2 26 46 2 Post grad education 16 36 ® 17 40 ® Married 66 41 1 66 46 2 Not married 33 31 -21 34 31 -26 Gay/Lesbian/Bisexual 2 14 -58 5 23 -43 Union Household 19 24 -31 23 30 -29 Employed Full Time 55 38 -3 64 40 -8 Working Women 29 35 -10 29 35 -21 Children under 18 36 38 -2 37 41 -7 " Gun Owner 37 51 13 .. Historical Summary of General Election Exit Polls: Presidential Elections: 1992 and 1996 GOP Vote Subgroup CBS/NYT 1992 GOP Vote 1992 GOP Margin VNS 1996 1996 GOP Margin Protestant 42 45 9 38 50 9 Catholic 27 35 -9 29 37 -16 Other Christian 14 38 -1 16 41 -4 Jewish 4 11 -69 3 16 -62 Else 6 26 -27 6 23 -37 None 7 18 -44 7 23 -36 White Prot/Christian 56 47 14 56 53 17 White BA (92) Religious Rgt (96) 17 62 39 17 65 39 Abortion Always Legal 34 20 -38 25 21 -48 Mostly Legal 29 34 -11 35 33 -22 Mostly Illegal 23 56 30 25 57 25 Always Illegal 9 63 39 12 68 45 Republicans 35 73 63 35 80 67 Independents 27 32 -6 26 35 -8 Democrats 38 10 -67 39 10 -74 Conservatives 30 64 46 33 71 51 Moderates 49 31 -16 47 33 -24 Liberals 21 14 -54 20 11 -67 Voted Dukakis 88 (Clinton 92) 27 5 -78 43 9 -76 Voted Bush 88 (Bush 92) 53 59 38 35 82 69 Voted Perot 92 12 44 22 Voted Other 88 (Other 92) 2 5 -61 1 36 12 Did not vote in 88 (92) 15 26 -22 9 33 -20 Financial Situation Better 24 61 37 33 26 -40 Worse 34 14 -47 20 57 30 Same 41 42 1 45 45 -1 National Econ. Condition Excel. 1 35 -18 4 17 -61 Good 18 82 74 51 31 -31 Not Good 47 37 -6 36 52 18 Poor 32 12 -52 7 51 28 Country on Right Direction 53 24 -45 Wrong Track 43 61 38 ( ( 20 State Census Numbers - Registered Voters AGE/GENDER Male 18-24 0.051 0.048 0.053 0.037 0.039 0.041 0.044 0.055 0.041 0.051 0.040 0.052 0.050 0.045 0.065 0.042 0.014 0.035 0.025 0.043 0.05 Male 25-44 0.192 0.201 0.187 0.198 0.196 0.187 0.191 0.204 0.182 0.206 0.180 0.193 0.184 0.215 0.160 0.224 0.193 0.180 0.208 0.208 0.19 Male 45-64 0.140 0.132 0.155 0.136 0.142 0.161 0.150 0.156 0.152 0.144 0.145 0.142 0.158 0.140 0.137 0.151 0.151 0.155 0.144 0.161 0.15 Male 65+ 0.088 0.093 0.071 0.082 0.097 0,076 0.101 o.on 0.094 0.066 0.086 0.070 0.082 0.082 0.091 o.on 0.097 0.097 0.095 0.068 0.08 Female 18-24 0.048 0.054 0.055 0.063 0.039 0.051 0.044 0.051 0.047 0.055 0.046 0.057 0.038 0.052 0.061 0.048 0.037 0.053 0.048 0.046 0.05 Female 25-44 0.208 0.203 0.218 0.220 0.204 0.200 0.185 0.211 0.195 0.239 0.222 0.238 0.170 0.205 0.202 0.231 0.228 0.223 0.220 0.214 0.21 Female 45-64 0.158 0.150 0.161 0.172 0.163 0.173 0.166 0.151 0.174 0.159 0.168 0.161 0.110 0.172 0.182 0.147 0.166 0.163 0.149 o.1n 0.16 Female 65+ 0.116 0.119 0.099 0.091 0.120 0.110 0.118 0.094 0.115 0.080 0.112 0.086 0.208 0.090 0.104 0.079 0.114 0.096 0.113 0.082 0.11 GENDER Male 0.470 0.473 0.466 0.454 0.474 0.466 0.486 0.493 0.469 0.467 0.451 0.458 0.474 0.482 0.451 0.494 0.455 0.466 0.471 0.481 0.47 Female 0.530 0.527 0.534 0.546 0.526 0.534 0.514 0.507 0.531 0.533 0.549 0.542 0.526 0.518 0.549 0.506 0.545 0.534 0.529 0.519 0.53 AGE 18-24 0.098 0.102 0.108 0.101 0.079 0.092 0.088 0.106 0.088 0.106 0.086 0.109 0.088 0.097 0.126 0.090 0.052 0.087 0.072 0.089 0.10 25-44 0.399 0.404 0.405 0.419 0.400 0.387 o.3n 0.415 0.376 0.445 0.402 0.431 0.392 0.419 0.362 0.455 0.421 0.402 0.428 0.423 0.41 45-64 0.298 0.281 0.317 0.308 0.305 0.335 0.316 0.306 0.327 0.303 0.314 0.304 0.327 0.312 0.318 0.298 0.317 0.316 0.293 0.337 0.31 65+ 0.205 0.212 0.170 0.173 0.217 0.186 0.219 0.171 0.209 0.147 0.198 0.156 0.192 0.172 0.195 0.156 0.210 0.194 0.207 0.151 0.19 RACE White 0.821 0.970 0.857 0.921 0.854 0.908 0.903 0.956 0.819 0.702 0.923 0.709 0.798 0.819 0.941 0.957 0.919 0.911 0.961 0.946 0.87 Black 0.167 0.015 0.125 0.076 0.127 0.087 0.089 0.033 0.171 0.290 0.073 0.287 0.180 0.178 0.037 0.021 0.050 0.015 0.022 0.013 0.12 Hispanic 0.026 0.008 0.017 0.010 0.075 0.006 0.016 0.011 0.002 0.006 0.001 0.011 0.004 0.003 0.125 0.081 0.045 0.336 0.018 O.o19 0.03 20statecens 20 Key States % Decision... 2000 Page 1of10 National 1-~,l\~ditio~aJ presidential exit polls-- B Vote for President in today's election 0 GORE BUSH BUCHANAN NADER Are you: % of total category % of category 48 Male 42 53 0 3 52 Female 54 43 0 2 0 GORE BUSH BUCHANAN NADER Whites only % of total category % of category 48 Male 36 60 0 3 52 Female 48 49 0 2 0 GORE BUSH BUCHANAN NADER Are you: % of total category % of category 81 White 42 54 0 3 10 Black 90 9 0 1 '---" Back to front 7 Hispanic/Latino 62 35 1 2 2 Asian 55 41 1 3 •National results 1 Other 55 39 0 4 •President 0 GORE BUSH BUCHANAN NADER •Senate To which age group do you belong? •House % of total category % of category •Govemor 17 18-29 48 46 1 5 33 30-44 48 49 0 2 • state results 28 45-59 48 49 1 2 • ExitpoUs 22 60+ 51 47 0 2 •Help 0 GORE BUSH BUCHANAN NADER Age-65 & over % of total category % of category 86 18-64 48 48 0 3 14 65+ 50 47 0 2 0 GORE BUSH BUCHANAN NADER What was the last grade of school you completed? % of total category % of category 5 No high school 59 39 1 1 21 High School graduate 48 49 1 1 32 Some college 45 51 0 3 24 College Graduate 45 51 0 3 18 Post graduate studies 52 44 0 3 0 GORE BUSH BUCHANAN NADER Do you have a college education? % of total category % of category 58 Not completed 47 49 1 2 42 Completed 48 48 0 3 0 GORE BUSH BUCHANAN NADER 1999 total family income: % of total category % of category 7 Less than 15,000 57 37 1 4 16 15,000-30,000 54 41 1 3 24 30,000-50,000 49 48 0 2 25 50,000-75,000 46 51 0 2 http://www.msnbc.com/m/d2k/g/polls.asp ?office=P&state=N 1 11/8/00 Decision 2000 Page 2of10 13 75,000-100,000 45 52 0 2 15 Over 100,000 43 54 0 2 0 GORE BUSH BUCHANAN NADER Are you currently married? % of total category % of category 65 Yes 44 53 1 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 4 0 GORE BUSH BUCHANAN NADER Do you have any children under 18 living in your household? % of total category % of category 39 Yes 45 52 0 2 61 No 50 46 1 3 0 GORE BUSH BUCHANAN NADER Are you married with children? % of total category % of category 31 Yes 41 56 0 2 69 No 51 44 1 3 0 GORE BUSH BUCHANAN NADER Do you work full-time for pay? % of total category % of category 67 Yes 49 48 0 2 33 No 47 48 1 3 0 GORE BUSH BUCHANAN NADER Working women: % of total category % of category 31 Yes 58 39 0 2 69 No 44 52 1 3 0 GORE BUSH BUCHANAN NADER No matter how you voted today, do you usually think of yourself as a: % of total category % of category 39 Democrat 86 11 0 2 35 Republican 8 91 0 1 27 Independent 45 47 1 6 0 GORE BUSH BUCHANAN NADER Do you or does someone in your household belong to a labor union? % of total category % of category 26 Yes 59 37 3 74 No 44 52 0 2 0 GORE BUSH BUCHANAN NADER Do you, or does someone in your household belong to a labor union? % of total category % of category 16 lam 62 34 1 3 10 Someone else in house 54 41 1 3 ~ ~ 44 ~ 0 2 0 GORE BUSH BUCHANAN NADER Which best describes you? % of total category Q % of category Upper class 4 0 vS6 39 0 3 27 Upper-middle class 43 54 0 3 46 Middle class 48 49 0 2 18 Working class 51 46 0 3 2 Lower class 0 0 0 0 0 GORE BUSH BUCHANAN NADER On most political matters, do you consider yourself: % of total category % of category 20 Liberal 80 13 1 6 50 Moderate 52 44 0 2 29 Conservative 17 81 0 1 0 GORE BUSH BUCHANAN NADER Is this the first time you have ever voted? % of total category % of category 9 Yes 52 43 1 4 91 No 48 48 0 2 0 GORE BUSH BUCHANAN NADER Are you gay, lesbian or bisexual? % of total category % of category 4 Yes 70 25 0 4 http://www.msnbc.com/m/d2k/g/polls.asp ?office=P&state=N 1 11/8/00 Decision 2000 Page 3of10 96 No 47 50 0 3 0 GORE BUSH BUCHANAN NADER In the 1996 election for President, did you vote for: % of total category % of category 46 Clinton 82 15 1 2 31 Dole
Recommended publications
  • Union Calendar No. 481 104Th Congress, 2D Session – – – – – – – – – – – – House Report 104–879

    Union Calendar No. 481 104Th Congress, 2D Session – – – – – – – – – – – – House Report 104–879

    1 Union Calendar No. 481 104th Congress, 2d Session ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± House Report 104±879 REPORT ON THE ACTIVITIES OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES DURING THE ONE HUNDRED FOURTH CONGRESS PURSUANT TO CLAUSE 1(d) RULE XI OF THE RULES OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES JANUARY 2, 1997.ÐCommitted to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 36±501 WASHINGTON : 1997 COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED FOURTH CONGRESS HENRY J. HYDE, Illinois, Chairman 1 CARLOS J. MOORHEAD, California JOHN CONYERS, JR., Michigan F. JAMES SENSENBRENNER, JR., PATRICIA SCHROEDER, Colorado Wisconsin BARNEY FRANK, Massachusetts BILL MCCOLLUM, Florida CHARLES E. SCHUMER, New York GEORGE W. GEKAS, Pennsylvania HOWARD L. BERMAN, California HOWARD COBLE, North Carolina RICH BOUCHER, Virginia LAMAR SMITH, Texas JOHN BRYANT, Texas STEVEN SCHIFF, New Mexico JACK REED, Rhode Island ELTON GALLEGLY, California JERROLD NADLER, New York CHARLES T. CANADY, Florida ROBERT C. SCOTT, Virginia BOB INGLIS, South Carolina MELVIN L. WATT, North Carolina BOB GOODLATTE, Virginia XAVIER BECERRA, California STEPHEN E. BUYER, Indiana JOSEÂ E. SERRANO, New York 2 MARTIN R. HOKE, Ohio ZOE LOFGREN, California SONNY BONO, California SHEILA JACKSON LEE, Texas FRED HEINEMAN, North Carolina MAXINE WATERS, California 3 ED BRYANT, Tennessee STEVE CHABOT, Ohio MICHAEL PATRICK FLANAGAN, Illinois BOB BARR, Georgia ALAN F. COFFEY, JR., General Counsel/Staff Director JULIAN EPSTEIN, Minority Staff Director 1 Henry J. Hyde, Illinois, elected to the Committee as Chairman pursuant to House Resolution 11, approved by the House January 5 (legislative day of January 4), 1995.
  • Appendix File Anes 1988‐1992 Merged Senate File

    Appendix File Anes 1988‐1992 Merged Senate File

    Version 03 Codebook ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ CODEBOOK APPENDIX FILE ANES 1988‐1992 MERGED SENATE FILE USER NOTE: Much of his file has been converted to electronic format via OCR scanning. As a result, the user is advised that some errors in character recognition may have resulted within the text. MASTER CODES: The following master codes follow in this order: PARTY‐CANDIDATE MASTER CODE CAMPAIGN ISSUES MASTER CODES CONGRESSIONAL LEADERSHIP CODE ELECTIVE OFFICE CODE RELIGIOUS PREFERENCE MASTER CODE SENATOR NAMES CODES CAMPAIGN MANAGERS AND POLLSTERS CAMPAIGN CONTENT CODES HOUSE CANDIDATES CANDIDATE CODES >> VII. MASTER CODES ‐ Survey Variables >> VII.A. Party/Candidate ('Likes/Dislikes') ? PARTY‐CANDIDATE MASTER CODE PARTY ONLY ‐‐ PEOPLE WITHIN PARTY 0001 Johnson 0002 Kennedy, John; JFK 0003 Kennedy, Robert; RFK 0004 Kennedy, Edward; "Ted" 0005 Kennedy, NA which 0006 Truman 0007 Roosevelt; "FDR" 0008 McGovern 0009 Carter 0010 Mondale 0011 McCarthy, Eugene 0012 Humphrey 0013 Muskie 0014 Dukakis, Michael 0015 Wallace 0016 Jackson, Jesse 0017 Clinton, Bill 0031 Eisenhower; Ike 0032 Nixon 0034 Rockefeller 0035 Reagan 0036 Ford 0037 Bush 0038 Connally 0039 Kissinger 0040 McCarthy, Joseph 0041 Buchanan, Pat 0051 Other national party figures (Senators, Congressman, etc.) 0052 Local party figures (city, state, etc.) 0053 Good/Young/Experienced leaders; like whole ticket 0054 Bad/Old/Inexperienced leaders; dislike whole ticket 0055 Reference to vice‐presidential candidate ? Make 0097 Other people within party reasons Card PARTY ONLY ‐‐ PARTY CHARACTERISTICS 0101 Traditional Democratic voter: always been a Democrat; just a Democrat; never been a Republican; just couldn't vote Republican 0102 Traditional Republican voter: always been a Republican; just a Republican; never been a Democrat; just couldn't vote Democratic 0111 Positive, personal, affective terms applied to party‐‐good/nice people; patriotic; etc.
  • THE SHERIFFS STAR VOL 36, NO 1, FEB-MAR 1992.Pdf

    THE SHERIFFS STAR VOL 36, NO 1, FEB-MAR 1992.Pdf

    ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ II ~ I ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ Reapportioning Florida By Maury Kalchakian General Counsel Florida Sheriffs Association After each decennial (ev- ery ten years) census, Florida CONTENTS is required to reapportion its state legislative and U.S.Con- gressional districts. The legis- MauryMau KolchaKolchakian lature is currently in the throes of this procedure, and, Florida SherdS Association Page practically speaking, the job must be completed prior to the (Micers. ...........,...........,.........................................2 1992 general elections. Board ofDirectors .......................... .... Reapportionment is the process of re-dividing a given . .. ..............3 number ofseats (40 in the State Senate, 120in the House) FLORIDA'S GOVKKGKNT among units ofgovernment or geographic districts. This is Stttte Government Chart ...................,..........,......4 usually done according to an established plan or formula. Executive Branch ......„,........ ,......... .,...... .-. ... 6 The number of state legislative districts will not in- . .. .. .. crease. However, some areas ofthe state are growing faster Directory of State Agencies ...„......,...........,.......11 than others, and therefore the district boundary lines will Legislative Branch ...„...........,...........,..........,....14 have to be changed to give all Florida residents equal Judicial Branch ..........,..........„.....,.....................21 representation. Florida's The 1990 census gave Florida a population of 12.94 U,S. Senators million, a hefty increase
  • Sample Ballot Nov. 2000

    Sample Ballot Nov. 2000

    SAMPLE BALLOT • GENERAL ELECTION MULTNOMAH COUNTY, OREGON • NOVEMBER 7, 2000 ATTORNEY GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS TO VOTER UNITED STATES REPRESENTATIVE IN VOTE FOR ONE USE A PENCIL ONLY CONGRESS, 1ST CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT TO VOTE, BLACKEN THE OVAL ( ) VOTE FOR ONE HARDY MYERS Democrat COMPLETELY TO THE LEFT OF THE RESPONSE OF YOUR CHOICE. BETH A. KING KEVIN L. MANNIX Libertarian Republican TO WRITE IN A NAME, BLACKEN THE OVAL ( ) TO THE LEFT OF THE DAVID WU THOMAS B. COX DOTTED LINE AND WRITE THE NAME Democrat Libertarian ON THAT DOTTED LINE. CHARLES STARR _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Republican NATIONAL STATE SENATOR, 6TH DISTRICT _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ VOTE FOR ONE UNITED STATES PRESIDENT GINNY BURDICK AND VICE PRESIDENT UNITED STATES REPRESENTATIVE IN Democrat Your vote for the candidates for United States CONGRESS, 3RD CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT President and Vice President shall be a vote for VOTE FOR ONE _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ the electors supporting those candidates. VOTE FOR ONE TICKET EARL BLUMENAUER STATE SENATOR, 7TH DISTRICT LIBERTARIAN Democrat VOTE FOR ONE U.S. President, HARRY BROWNE WALTER F. (WALT) BROWN KATE BROWN U.S. Vice President, ART OLIVIER Socialist Democrat BRUCE ALEXANDER KNIGHT CHARLEY J. NIMS INDEPENDENT Libertarian Socialist U.S. President, PATRICK J. BUCHANAN JEFFERY L. POLLOCK _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ U.S.
  • The Second Tea Party-Freedomworks Survey Report

    The Second Tea Party-Freedomworks Survey Report

    FreedomWorks Supporters: 2012 Campaign Activity, 2016 Preferences, and the Future of the Republican Party Ronald B. Rapoport and Meredith G. Dost Department of Government College of William and Mary September 11, 2013 ©Ronald B. Rapoport Introduction Since our first survey of FreedomWorks subscribers in December 2011, a lot has happened: the 2012 Republican nomination contests, the 2012 presidential and Congressional elections, continuing debates over the budget, Obamacare, and immigration, and the creation of a Republican Party Growth and Opportunity Project (GOP). In all of these, the Tea Party has played an important role. Tea Party-backed candidates won Republican nominations in contested primaries in Arizona, Indiana, Texas and Missouri, and two of the four won elections. Even though Romney was not a Tea Party favorite (see the first report), the movement pushed him and other Republican Congressional/Senatorial candidates (e.g., Orin Hatch) to engage the Tea Party agenda even when they had not done so before. In this report, we will focus on the role of FreedomWorks subscribers in the 2012 nomination and general election campaigns. We’ll also discuss their role in—and view of—the Republican Party as we move forward to 2014 and 2016. This is the first of multiple reports on the March-June 2013 survey, which re-interviewed 2,613 FreedomWorks subscribers who also filled out the December 2011 survey. Key findings: Rallying around Romney (pp. 3-4) Between the 2011 and 2013 surveys, Romney’s evaluations went up significantly from 2:1 positive to 4:1 positive surveys. By the end of the nomination process Romney and Santorum had become the two top nomination choices but neither received over a quarter of the sample’s support.
  • Die Presse: Watergate Und Die Zeiten Trumps – Ein Déjà-Vu?»

    Die Presse: Watergate Und Die Zeiten Trumps – Ein Déjà-Vu?»

    «DIE PRESSE: WATERGATE UND DIE ZEITEN TRUMPS – EIN DÉJÀ-VU?» Maturarbeit Jann Stäbler Ueblistrasse 2 8330 Pfäffi kon ZH Betreut durch Herrn Adrian Schläpfer Eingereicht am 8. Januar 2019 Kantonale Maturitätsschule für Erwachsene Zürich Abb. 1: Bildkomposition: Donald Trump im Oval Office im Mai 2018 und Richard Nixon, «Official Presidential Photograph» im Juli 1971 Einleitung | I Demokratie bedeutet nicht nur, dass man Wahlen « abhält, Demokratie bedeutet auch Institutionen, Demokratie ist etwas sehr Fragiles. Es geht auch um Vertrauen, um Kompromisse, die man bereit ist, einzugehen. Respekt vor den Gegnern, vor der Gewaltentrennung. Und auch der Respekt vor den Medien, der Pressefreiheit. Isabelle Jacobi, SRF-Korrespondentin 13. Oktober 2018, Washington DC » Einleitung | II EINLEITUNG Vorwort Vorwurf der Obstruktion der Justiz, Medien als Feindbild, politische Intrigen – die Parallelen, die auf den ersten Blick zwischen der Watergate-Affäre damals und der Russland-Affäre heute existieren, scheinen frappierend. Aber sind die beiden Fälle wirklich vergleichbar, trotz der zeitlichen Differenz und der verschiedenen Umstän- de? Seit April dieses Jahres beschäftigte ich mich intensiv mit dem politischen System der USA, Präsident Nixon und der Watergate-Affäre, sowie Präsident Trump und der Russland-Affäre. Während meiner Recherchen habe ich den Fokus, neben anderen Aspekten, speziell auch auf die Rolle der Medien gelegt. Für meine Recher- chearbeit habe ich mehrere Bücher und diverse Zeitungsartikel gelesen sowie zwei Interviews geführt. Relativ überraschend hat sich im Herbst die Gelegenheit ergeben, mit meinem Vater in die USA fliegen zu kön- nen, wo wir für ein paar Tage bei einem ehemaligen amerikanischen Arbeitskollegen meines Vaters in Raleigh, North Carolina, gewohnt haben und anschliessend noch einige Tage in Washington D.C.
  • Gone Rogue: Time to Reform the Presidential Primary Debates

    Gone Rogue: Time to Reform the Presidential Primary Debates

    Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy Discussion Paper Series #D-67, January 2012 Gone Rogue: Time to Reform the Presidential Primary Debates by Mark McKinnon Shorenstein Center Reidy Fellow, Fall 2011 Political Communications Strategist Vice Chairman Hill+Knowlton Strategies Research Assistant: Sacha Feinman © 2012 President and Fellows of Harvard College. All rights reserved. How would the course of history been altered had P.T. Barnum moderated the famed Lincoln-Douglas debates in 1858? Today’s ultimate showman and on-again, off-again presidential candidate Donald Trump invited the Republican presidential primary contenders to a debate he planned to moderate and broadcast over the Christmas holidays. One of a record 30 such debates and forums held or scheduled between May 2011 and March 2012, this, more than any of the previous debates, had the potential to be an embarrassing debacle. Trump “could do a lot of damage to somebody,” said Karl Rove, the architect of President George W. Bush’s 2000 and 2004 campaigns, in an interview with Greta Van Susteren of Fox News. “And I suspect it’s not going to be to the candidate that he’s leaning towards. This is a man who says himself that he is going to run— potentially run—for the president of the United States starting next May. Why do we have that person moderating a debate?” 1 Sen. John McCain of Arizona, the 2008 Republican nominee for president, also reacted: “I guarantee you, there are too many debates and we have lost the focus on what the candidates’ vision for America is..
  • The Religious Right and the Rise of the Neo-Conservatives, in an Oral Examination Held on May 10, 2010

    The Religious Right and the Rise of the Neo-Conservatives, in an Oral Examination Held on May 10, 2010

    AWKWARD ALLIES: THE RELIGIOUS RIGHT AND THE RISE OF THE NEO-CONSERVATIVES A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Social and Political Thought University of Regina By Paul William Gaudette Regina, Saskatchewan July 2010 Copyright 2010: P.W. Gaudette Library and Archives Bibliotheque et Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-88548-2 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-88548-2 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par I'lnternet, preter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans le loan, distrbute and sell theses monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non­ support microforme, papier, electronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la these ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation.
  • More Than Kids Stuff: Can News and Information Web Sites Mobilize Young Adults? SPONS AGENCY National Science Foundation, Washington, DC

    More Than Kids Stuff: Can News and Information Web Sites Mobilize Young Adults? SPONS AGENCY National Science Foundation, Washington, DC

    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 473 027 SO 034 353 AUTHOR Lupia, Arthur; Philpot, Tasha S. TITLE More Than Kids Stuff: Can News and Information Web Sites Mobilize Young Adults? SPONS AGENCY National Science Foundation, Washington, DC. PUB DATE 2002-00-00 NOTE 33p.; Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. (Boston, MA, August 28- September 2, 2002). CONTRACT 0094964 PUB TYPE Reports Research (143) Speeches/Meeting Papers (150) EDRS PRICE EDRS Price MF01/PCO2 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Internet; *Mass Media Effects; Media Research; *Presidential Campaigns (United States); *Voting; *Young Adults IDENTIFIERS News Sources; Political Communication; *Web Sites ABSTRACT Many young adults are not politically active. Since 1972, their participation and interest levels have declined not only in absolute terms but also relative to other voting-age groups. This paper examines how the Internet can reverse this trend. It focuses on how leading news and political information Web sites affected young adults during the closing weeks of the 2000 presidential election campaign. The data come from a survey that exposes citizens to Web sites under varying conditions. The data are used to document how individual sites change viewers' political interest and likely participation levels. Seemingly similar sites had dramatically different effects on young viewers. The analysis documents that sites which provide information effectively increase political interest and participation for all ages, but young and old differ significantly on which sites are effective. Findings suggest that using the Internet to increase youth political engagement entails unique, but discoverable, challenges. (Contains 21 references, 7 notes, and 4 tables.)(Author/BT) Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document.
  • Businesses Brace for Energy Cost Increases

    Businesses Brace for Energy Cost Increases

    newsJUNE 2011 We all influence the health of those around us, especially in the work place. As an employer, you have a tremendous effect on employee health by the examples you set and the health care plans you choose. As a Kentucky Chamber Businesses member, you’re connected to big savings on big benefits for your small business. Help employees get more involved in their health care with consumer-driven HSA, HRA and HIA plans, or choose from more traditional solutions. Either way, brace for you can build a complete benefits package – including preventive care and prescription coverage – with one-stop shopping convenience. energy cost Talk to your broker, call the Kentucky Chamber at 800-431-6833 or visit increases group.anthem.com/kcoc for more information. PAGE 1 Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield is the trade name of Anthem Health Plans of Kentucky, Inc. Life and Disability products underwritten by Anthem Life Insurance Company. Independent licensees of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association. ® ANTHEM is a registered trademark of Anthem Insurance Companies, Inc. The Blue Cross and Blue Shield names and symbols are registered marks of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association. 19075KYAENABS 1/11 JUNE 2011 Business Summit and Annual Meeting Businesses Morning Joe hosts brace for to share their views energy cost at Annual Meeting ONE OF CABLE television’s highest rated morning increases talk shows, MSNBC’s Morning Joe, is not just a NEW DATA from Kentucky’s regulated news source — it’s also been, at times, a newsmak- electric utility companies shows that the er.
  • See Pulitzer Prize Winner Jon Meacham with Karl Rove! Date: May 8, 2018

    See Pulitzer Prize Winner Jon Meacham with Karl Rove! Date: May 8, 2018

    From: Mississippi Book Festival [email protected] Subject: See Pulitzer Prize Winner Jon Meacham with Karl Rove! Date: May 8, 2018 Jon Meacham Gets Candid with Karl Rove Jon Meacham, Pulitzer Prize winning author, and Karl Rove, political strategist, author, and commentator, will discuss Meacham’s optimistic message for a divided America in his newest book, The Soul of America: The Battle for Our Better Angels, at the Mississippi Book Festival Aug. 18. The new work, in which he takes an encouraging look at the nation’s resilient past, is Meacham’s eighth book. Citing America’s current cultural and political rifts and the roles of past Presidents who guided the country through earlier difficult periods, Meacham draws on their challenges to make his case for hope for America’s present day, as well as its future. Meacham’s previous books include the New York Times bestseller biographies of George Herbert Walker Bush, Andrew Jackson, and Thomas Jefferson. A distinguished visiting professor at Vanderbilt University, Meacham is a contributing writer to the New York Times Book Review, and a contributing editor of Time, and he has written for a number of other publications. He also regularly appears as a political commentator on several television talk shows. A former editor and vice president at Random House, he holds honorary doctorate degrees at more than a half dozen universities and colleges. “To know what has come before is to be armed against despair.” – JON MEACHAM— in "The Soul of America" Dubbed “The Architect” by President George W. Bush, Karl Rove was the chief strategist for both of Bush’s runs for the White House and served as Deputy Chief of Staff and Senior Advisor in the West Wing.
  • General Election 2000.Xls

    General Election 2000.Xls

    GENERAL ELECTION-NOVEMBER 7, 2000 O F F I C I A L R E S U L T S Precinct Counted TOTAL Early/AB 1 2 3 45678910111213141516171920 President & Vice President George W. Bush & Dick Cheney (R) 4472 1763 150 82 93 97 137 189 103 270 134 207 268 218 203 107 143 33 47 107 121 Al Gore & Joe Lieberman (D) 4208 1490 186 189 286 136 99 237 117 182 115 153 150 111 212 107 63 9 35 179 152 Harry Browne & Art Olivier (L) 73 31 7240441330514100030 John Hagelin & Nat Goldhaber (N) 14 23003001000100002020 Ralph Nader & Winona LaDuke (G) 820 226 69 52 78 29 28 57 23 28 27 36 11 14 23 16 9 1 2 43 48 Howard Phillips & J. Curtis Frazier (A) 601000100000030100000 Pat Buchanan & Ezola Foster (F) 42 18 3120010011414121020 Earl F. Dodge & W. Dean Watkins (P) 101000000000000000000 James Harris & Margaret Trowe (SW) 100000000000000010000 David McReynolds & Mary Cal Hollis (SP) 101000000000000000000 Representative to the 107th United States Congress District 3 Curtis Imrie (D) 2881 996 116 137 219 87 80 161 89 117 73 95 109 67 151 74 55 4 21 127 103 Scott McInnis (R) 5741 2229 238 131 181 148 156 244 134 333 177 265 297 255 239 125 153 35 54 176 171 Drew Sakson (L) 282 87 26 19 21 7 10 19 2 11 6 8 9 4 19 8 4 3 0 9 10 Victor A. Good (RP) 145 46 17 398685442346230177 Secretary of State - 2 year term Donetta Davidson (R) 4531 1827 165 106 113 114 142 179 115 267 147 204 247 193 172 95 125 32 44 121 123 Anthony Martinez (D) 3260 1108 143 137 228 108 92 191 86 133 87 114 125 100 171 85 64 5 22 141 120 Clyde J.