DOCSLIB.ORG

Section 1: Plan Summary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Framingham Open Space and Recreation Plan Framingham, MA July 2008 Framingham 2008 Open Space and Recreation Plan DRAFT 07/15/2008 Page i - 1 Framingham Open Space and Recreation Plan Framingham, MA July 2008 Prepared by the Open Space and Recreation Planning Committee, Department of Parks and Recreation, and Department of Community and Economic Development Special thanks go to all the residents who responded to the survey or provided comments and suggestions at public forums or meetings; your thoughtful comments are reflected in this plan. The Open Space and Recreation Planning Committee members were: • Thomas Branham, Bicycle and Pedestrian Committee • Karen Dempsey, Disability Commission • Dennis Giombetti, Board of Selectmen • George C. Harrington, Agricultural Commission • Pam Helinek, Conservation Commission • Dan Jones, Parks and Recreation Commission • Mark Lamkin, Resident At-large • Andy Limeri, School Committee • Tom Mahoney, Planning Board • Bob Moore, Resident At-Large • Chris Walsh, Historic District Commission Staff Support was provided by: • Jennifer Steel, Conservation Commission • Michele Grzenda, Conservation Commission • Geoff Kovar, Department of Public Works, Engineering • Stephanie McNulty, Conservation Intern • Trisha Powell, Parks and Recreation • Bryan Taberner, Community and Economic Development • Eugene Kennedy, Community and Economic Development • Stephen Wallace, Community and Economic Development Framingham 2008 Open Space and Recreation Plan DRAFT 07/15/2008 Page i - 2 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS..............................................................................................................3 CHAPTER 1: PLAN SUMMARY.................................................................................................6 A. Purpose ......................................................................................................................6 B. Process ......................................................................................................................6 C. Goals..........................................................................................................................6 D. Implementation...........................................................................................................6 E. Highlights of the Action Plan ......................................................................................7 CHAPTER 2: INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................8 A. Introduction to the 2008 Plan .....................................................................................8 B. Statement of Purpose.................................................................................................8 C. Vision for Framingham ...............................................................................................8 D. Open Space and Recreation Committee....................................................................9 E. Public Participation and Input.....................................................................................9 CHAPTER 3: COMMUNITY SETTING: A CULTURAL INVENTORY......................................11 A. History of the Community .........................................................................................11 B. Growth and Development Patterns ..........................................................................13 C. Regional Context......................................................................................................14 D. Local Context ...........................................................................................................15 E. Population and Housing Characteristics ..................................................................15 F. Framingham’s “Gray Infrastructure”..........................................................................18 G. Framingham’s “Green Infrastructure” (Environmental Resources Used by Residents).....................................................................................................................22 H. Framingham’s Unique Cultural Resources...............................................................26 I. Framingham's Regulatory and Planning Framework.................................................31 CHAPTER 4: ENVIRONMENTAL INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS............................................37 A. Landscape Character ...............................................................................................37 B. Geology, Soils, and Topography ..............................................................................37 C. Water Resources .....................................................................................................38 D. Common and Rare Habitats: Vegetation and Associated Wildlife ...........................43 White Pine – Oak Forest...............................................................................................43 Oak-Hickory Forest.......................................................................................................44 Cultural Grassland ........................................................................................................45 Red Maple Swamp........................................................................................................45 Deep Emergent Marsh..................................................................................................45 Woodland Vernal Pool ..................................................................................................46 E. Wildlife and Fisheries ...............................................................................................47 F. Environmental Problems: Impacts of Development..................................................50 CHAPTER 5: INVENTORY OF LANDS OF CONSERVATION AND RECREATION INTEREST ..................................................................................................................................................56 Framingham 2008 Open Space and Recreation Plan DRAFT 07/15/2008 Page i - 3 A. Overview...................................................................................................................56 B. Protected Open Space .............................................................................................58 C. Protected Active Recreation Land............................................................................66 D. Unprotected Open Space.........................................................................................68 E. Unprotected Active Recreation Land........................................................................71 F. Priority Parcels for Protection ...................................................................................72 CHAPTER 6: COMMUNITY GOALS ........................................................................................75 CHAPTER 7: ANALYSIS OF NEED .........................................................................................79 A. Selection of What Has Been Accomplished from the 2003 Plan..............................79 B. What Remains to be Done from 2003 Plan..............................................................79 C. Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan...............................................80 D. Environmental / Resource Protection Needs -- From Chapter 4..............................81 E. Community’s Needs -- From Chapter 6....................................................................81 F. Board/Commission/Committee Priorities..................................................................81 G. A Focus on Implementation and Funding ................................................................82 H. Compilation of Needs...............................................................................................83 CHAPTER 8: GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ...............................................................................85 CHAPTER 9: THE FIVE-YEAR ACTION PLAN .......................................................................86 A. Introduction...............................................................................................................86 B. Highlights of the Action Plan ....................................................................................86 C. The Five-Year Action Plan .......................................................................................89 CHAPTER 10: PUBLIC COMMENT .........................................................................................95 CHAPTER 11: REFERENCES ..............................................................................................101 APPENDIX A ..........................................................................................................................103 APPENDIX B ..........................................................................................................................104 2008 WINTER PROGRAMS.......................................................................................110 APPENDICES A. Conservation Commission Programs B. Parks and Recreation Programs C. Public Surveys (English, Portugese, and Spanish) D. Summary of Framingham’s ADA Self-Evaluation & Transition Plan MAPS 1. Trails 2. Unique Cultural Features 3. Zoning 4. Land Use 5. Physical Limitations to Development 6. Water Resources Framingham 2008 Open Space and Recreation Plan DRAFT 07/15/2008 Page i - 4 7. Protected and Unprotected Recreation
Recommended publications
  • Sudbury Master Plan

    Sudbury Master Plan

    SUDBURY MASTER PLAN BASELINE REPORT VOLUME I Adopted by the Sudbury Planning Board [date placeholder] Sudbury Master Plan BASELINE REPORT Volume 1 February 19, 2021 Prepared for the Sudbury Master Plan Steering Committee Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 5 Community Profile ........................................................................................................................................ 7 Transportation ............................................................................................................................................ 17 Housing ....................................................................................................................................................... 34 Economic Development .............................................................................................................................. 47 Historic and Cultural Resources .................................................................................................................. 70 Town Services ............................................................................................................................................. 87 Open Space and Recreation ...................................................................................................................... 106 Natural Resources ....................................................................................................................................
  • STATE LOCAL EDUCATION AGENCY (ENROLLMENTS > 1250) ENR. 504S RATE CONNECTICUT Newtown School District 4570 710 15.53% TEXAS

    STATE LOCAL EDUCATION AGENCY (ENROLLMENTS > 1250) ENR. 504S RATE CONNECTICUT Newtown School District 4570 710 15.53% TEXAS

    As a supplement to the corresponDing Zirkel analysis in the Educa'on Law Reporter, this compilaon, in DescenDing orDer of the percentage of 504-only stuDents, is baseD on the 2015-16 CRDC Data. To obtain the actual complete Data anD to request any correcbons, please go Directly to hdps://ocrData.eD.gov/ STATE LOCAL EDUCATION AGENCY (ENROLLMENTS > 1250) ENR. 504s RATE CONNECTICUT Newtown School District 4570 710 15.53% TEXAS Carrizo Springs Consol. InDep. School District 2254 325 14.41% CONNECTICUT Weston School District 2393 343 14.33% TEXAS Pittsburg InDep. School District 2472 335 13.55% TEXAS Pleasanton InDep. School District 3520 467 13.26% TEXAS Van Alstyne InDep. School District 1336 174 13.02% NEW JERSEY Hanover Park Regional High School District 1561 200 12.81% TEXAS Buna InDep. School District 1456 183 12.56% TEXAS Tatum InDep. School District 1687 208 12.32% TEXAS Crockett InDep. School District 1280 157 12.26% NEW YORK WinDsor Central School District 1697 208 12.25% TEXAS Hughes Springs InDep. School District 1266 153 12.08% TEXAS Pottsboro InDep. School District 4284 507 11.83% TEXAS Lake Dallas InDep. School District 3945 467 11.83% TEXAS NorthsiDe InDep. School District 105049 12425 11.82% TEXAS Kerrville InDep. School District 5038 592 11.75% TEXAS Gatesville InDep. School District 2853 335 11.74% TEXAS GoDley InDep. School District 1780 205 11.51% PENNSYLVANIA WallingforD-Swarthmore School District 3561 401 11.26% GEORGIA Wilkinson County Schools 1523 169 11.09% LOUISIANA Terrebonne Parish School District 18445 2039 11.05% NEW YORK Briarcliff Manor Union Free School District 1469 162 11.02% WASHINGTON Mercer IslanD School District 4423 485 10.96% TEXAS Community InDep.
  • Chapter 4: Outdoor Recreational Resources— Hampshire County

    Chapter 4: Outdoor Recreational Resources— Hampshire County

    CHAPTER 4: OUTDOOR RECREATIONAL RESOURCES— HAMPSHIRE COUNTY Introduction With its rolling hills, cascading waters, deep forests, open meadows, and abundance of open space, the Route 112 Scenic Byway corridor is an extraordinary outdoor playground for residents and visitors alike. Opportunities abound in the region to hike, camp, swim, boat, cross‐country ski, hunt, fish, and cycle. In the Hampshire County section of the corridor, there are nearly 30 square miles of open space available for multiple recreational opportunities, including 5,803 acres within state forests and parks, 10,669 acres within wildlife management areas, and 1,919 acres within other significant open space lands. The greatest recreational treasures in Hampshire County include the Westfield River with its federal Wild and Scenic designation, and the extensive 7,900‐acre wilderness area created by the adjoining lands of the Knightville Dam Wildlife Management and Recreation Area, the Gilbert A. Bliss State Forest, and the Hiram H. Fox Wildlife Management Area. This Outdoor Recreational Resources chapter and accompanying map provide an inventory of recreational resources developed through a review of Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation listings, Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife’s MassWildlife listings, information from the Commonwealth’s Office of Geographic and Environmental Information (MassGIS), and narratives within the Open Space and Recreation Plans of Byway towns. Resources are described here by type of facility (State Forest and Parks, and Wildlife The Westfield River Wildwater Races, an annual spring event for more Management Areas) and than 55 years, attracts boating enthusiasts from across the northeast. by type of activity (hiking trails, camping, swimming, boating, cross‐country skiing and snowshoeing, hunting and fishing, bicycling, and golfing).
  • PM the Massachusetts Historical Commission

    PM the Massachusetts Historical Commission

    Inventory No: SBR.912 Historic Name: Weston Aqueduct Section 1 Bridge Common Name: MDC Access Road Bridge over Sudbury Reservoir Address: Weston Aqueduct City/Town: Southborough Village/Neighborhood: Fayville Local No: 7-6 Year Constructed: Architect(s): Gill, T. H. and Company Architectural Style(s): Arch Filled Spandrel; Arch Barrel Dressed Voussoir Use(s): Other Engineering; Other Transportation; Utilities Other Significance: Engineering; Transportation SBR.F: Sudbury Dam Historic District Area(s): sbr.i: Water Supply System of Metropolitan Boston Nat'l Register District (1/18/1990); Nat'l Register TRA Designation(s): (1/18/1990) Building Materials(s): The Massachusetts Historical Commission (MHC) has converted this paper record to digital format as part of ongoing projects to scan records of the Inventory of Historic Assets of the Commonwealth and National Register of Historic Places nominations for Massachusetts. Efforts are ongoing and not all inventory or National Register records related to this resource may be available in digital format at this time. The MACRIS database and scanned files are highly dynamic; new information is added daily and both database records and related scanned files may be updated as new information is incorporated into MHC files. Users should note that there may be a considerable lag time between the receipt of new or updated records by MHC and the appearance of related information in MACRIS. Users should also note that not all source materials for the MACRIS database are made available as scanned images. Users may consult the records, files and maps available in MHC's public research area at its offices at the State Archives Building, 220 Morrissey Boulevard, Boston, open M-F, 9-5.
  • Belchertown Sees Spike

    Belchertown Sees Spike

    PRSRT STD Belchertown, Granby & Amherst U.S. POSTAGE PAID PALMER, MA PERMIT NO. 22 ECR-WSS LOCAL POSTAL CUSTOMER THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 26, 2020 ENTINELYOUR HOMETOWN NEWSPAPER SINCE 1915 S A TURLEY PUBLICATION ❙ www.turley.com Volume 105 • Number 34 www.sentinel.turley.com BELCHERTOWN GRANBY SENIORS Yuletide Craft Sale..p. 5 ‘Wimpy kid’ author Season of visits kid...p. 10 Giving...p. 12 GRANBY EDUCATION Granby Belchertown sees spike Schools, BOS talks task force Belchertown is seeing discuss an increase in COVID-19 MVP grant cases, mirroring an increase throughout the metrics MELINA BOURDEAU state of Massachusetts. Staff writer for closing GRANBY – The Granby MELINA BOURDEAU Selectboard heard from Staff writer the Pioneer Valley Planning Commission about the upcom- BELCHERTOWN – ing task of integrating cli- As case numbers rise in mate resilience into a master Belchertown and the state, plan through a Municipal discussion of what fac- Vulnerability Preparedness tors would lead to the grant. Belchertown Public Schools Patty Gambarini of Pioneer going remote was brought up Valley Planning Commission in the COVID-19 task force presented the project to the meeting. board last week. In the COVID-19 task The town, partnering with force meeting on Nov. 20, PVPC and the Massachusetts School Committee Chair Executive Office of Environ- Heidi Gutekenst said as far as mental Affairs, are working deciding if the school’s clos- on two major elements of the ing, she doesn’t believe it’s a grant – regulatory review for School Committee decision. resilience and updating the COVID-19 task force approves signage The task force members town’s 2016 master plan.
  • Return of Organization Exempt from Income

    Return of Organization Exempt from Income

    r Return of Organization Exempt From Income Tax Form 990 527, or 4947(a)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code (except black lung Under section 501(c), LOOL benefit trust or private foundation) Department or me Ti2asury Internal Revenue Service 1 The organization may have to use a copy of this return to satisfy state reporting requirements A For the 2002 calendar year, or tax year period beginning APR 1 2002 and i MAR 31, 2003 B Check if Please C Name of organization D Employer identification number use IRS nddmss label or [::]change print or HE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS 04-2105780 ~changa s~ Number and street (or P.0 box if mad is not delivered to street address) Room/suite E Telephone number =Initial return sPecisc572 ESSEX STREET 978 921-1944 Final = City or town, state or country, and ZIP +4 F Pccoun6npmethad 0 Cash [K] Accrual return Other =Amended~'d~° [BEVERLY , MA 01915 licatio" ~ o S ~~ . El Section 501(c)(3) organizations and 4947(a)(1) nonexempt charitable trusts H and I are not applicable to section 527 organizations. :'dl°° must attach a completed Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) . H(a) Is this a group retain for affiliates ~ Yes OX No G web site: OWW " THETRUSTEES . ORG H(b) It 'Yes,' enter number of affiliates 10, J Organization type (cnakonly one) " OX 501(c) ( 3 ) 1 (Insert no) = 4947(a)(1) or = 52 H(c) Are all affiliates inciuded9 N/A 0 Yes 0 No (If -NO,- attach a list ) K Check here " 0 if the organization's gross receipts are normally not more than $25,000 .
  • The Sudbury, Assabet and Concord Wild and Scenic River Conservation Plan

    The Sudbury, Assabet and Concord Wild and Scenic River Conservation Plan

    The Sudbury, Assabet and Concord Wild and Scenic River Conservation Plan 2019 Update The Sudbury, Assabet and Concord Wild and Scenic River Conservation Plan May 2019 Update Sudbury, Assabet and Concord Wild and Scenic River Stewardship Council c/o National Park Service 15 State St Boston, MA 02109 617-223-5049 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................ 2 Map of the Watershed ................................................................................................... 3 I. Introduction ............................................................................................................. 4 History of the Wild and Scenic River Designation Management Principles of Partnership Wild and Scenic Rivers Achievements Resulting from Designation Changes in the Region Since 1996 Role of the River Stewardship Council Purpose and Process of the Update How to Use this Update II. The River Management Philosophy ........................................................................ 11 Goals of the Plan A watershed-wide Approach III. Updates to the Administrative Framework ............................................................. 13 IV. Threats to the Outstandingly Remarkable Resource Values .................................... 14 V. Resource Management .......................................................................................... 15 Overview Public and Private Lands Water Resources – Water Quality Water Resources – Water Quantity
  • Bicycle Network Gaps Feasibility Evaluations – Sudbury Aqueduct

    Bicycle Network Gaps Feasibility Evaluations – Sudbury Aqueduct

    ON REG ST IO O N B BOSTON REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION M Stephanie Pollack, MassDOT Secretary and CEO and MPO Chair E N T R O I Karl H. Quackenbush, Executive Director, MPO Staff O T P A O IZ LMPOI N TA A N G P OR LANNING TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM DATE: January 18, 2018 TO: Town of Framingham FROM: Casey Claude, Boston Region MPO Staff RE: Bicycle Network Gaps Feasibility Evaluations – Sudbury Aqueduct 1 INTRODUCTION Local, regional, and state government agencies in the Boston region are actively working on improving bicycling infrastructure to enhance safety, provide more connectivity between bicycle facilities, and increase the use of bicycling as a mode of transportation. Many bicycle facilities, such as shared-use paths, on- road bike lanes, and barrier-separated bike lanes (also called cycle tracks), were constructed as a result of these efforts. Consequently, a regionwide network of bicycle facilities connecting key destinations in the region, such as town centers and transit locations, has already been developed. However, within this network, there are gaps in continuity (a gap within one bicycle path) and connectivity (a gap between two paths or between a path and a roadway or transit service). These gaps necessitate that bicyclists use circuitous travel routes, reducing the efficiency of travel between key origins and destinations. These gaps exist for a number of reasons: a lack of coordinated planning; a lack of funding; right-of-way (ROW) constraints; competition for ROW space; difficulties related to coordinating efforts across multiple jurisdictions; and physical obstructions, such as waterways, bridges, roadways, and railroads.
  • Sudbury, Framingham, Marlborough, Southborough, Ashland, Sherborn

    Sudbury, Framingham, Marlborough, Southborough, Ashland, Sherborn

    Disclaimer and Cautions: The Bay Circuit Alliance, as the advocate and promoter of the Bay Circuit Trail, expressly disclaims responsibility for injuries or damages that may arise from using the trail. We cannot guarantee the accuracy of maps or completeness of warnings about hazards that may exist. Portions of the trail are along roads or train tracks and involve crossing them. Users should pay attention to traffic and walk on the shoulder of roads facing traffic, not on the pavement, cross only at designated locations and use extreme care. Children and pets need to be closely monitored and under control. about 100 yds west of jct with Horse Pond Rd. Follow the Salamander Trail markers (here the BCT overlaps with the Salamander Trail). The Salamander trail makes a sharp turn to left and returns to parking lot. Map 8 - Sudbury, Framingham, Marlborough, 0.5 Continue straight, entering the Nobscot Boy Scout Reservation (no horses, dogs must be on leash), and Southborough, Ashland, Sherborn - BAY turn right in about 20 yds. Bear right and follow tr CIRCUIT TRAIL route along base of ledge, climbing NW to ascend ridge. (as shown on map 8 dated February 2020) Turn left at T jct at ridge line. (text updated February 2020) Follow ridge to ledge, bear right at fork just north of ledge for more gradual ascent, and ascend to The BCT often follows pre-existing local trails; BCT- Tippling Rock (426-ft elevation) with good views specific blazing is a work in progress and may be sparse to east from north of Boston to the Blue Hills and in segments.
  • Choose Framingham Newsletter

    Choose Framingham Newsletter

    WELCOME TO THE CHOOSE FRAMINGHAM NEWSLETTER Choose Framingham Newsletter October 31, 2019 - In This Issue: 2nd Annual Oktoberfest Sanofi Genzyme New Facility Halstead Framingham Manufacturer of the Year Qura, Inc. Vacant Storefront Program New Businesses in Downtown Oktoberfest - Photo Credit Itala Keller Downtown Framingham, Inc. Hosts 2nd Annual Oktoberfest On Saturday, October 5, Downtown Framingham, Inc. (DFI) held its 2nd Annual Oktoberfest, which drew a crowd of over 500 people. The event spanned from City Hall Plaza on Concord Street to the Framingham Station parking lot at 417 Waverly Street, which is scheduled to open later this year. Four areas along the route were activated with street performers, activities, food, drinks, and other activities. On City Hall Plaza, attendees were able to shop vendors for soap, coffee, beauty products, jewelry and more, including Viva's Flowers, which Qura, Inc. recently opened at 79 Concord Street in Framingham. Medical Technology Company in Framingham Qura, Inc. is a medical technology company based in Framingham at 1 Grant Street. They are also a founding member of the MetroWest Life Sciences Network. Choose Framingham caught up with the company's Co-Founder, Doug Adams, to find out what's in store for Qura and why they chose Framingham. Tell us a little about Qura, Inc. - what Photo Credit Itala Keller do you do? The parking lot next to Framingham Station became a beer Qura has developed the first active, wireless garden featuring Framingham's own Jack's Abby and Exhibit 'A' and continuous eye pressure sensor for Brewing Company. Teams from major sponsors Loga do glaucoma that collects actionable data in real Marcizio, Wegman's, MutualOne Bank, and TD Bank were on time, facilitating timely and targeted medical site, while Framingham Station cooked up some samples of or surgical intervention for the 80MM people what will be on their menu later this year.
  • 1992 Annual Town Report

    1992 Annual Town Report

    ... --- -- ----- ------~--------------------------~--- 1992 ANNUAL TOWN REPORT Fire Headquarters, Hudson Road TOWN OF SUDBURY SUDBURY, MASSACHUSETIS 01776 FRONT COVER: Fire Headquarters on Hudson Road Completed in 1992 BACK COVER: Twin Ash Farm Photo Courtesy Town Crier This weathervane of a fire­ man sits atop the new Sud­ bury Fire Dept. (Photo by Sandy Hill) Town Crier Photo 353rd Annual Report of the Offical Boards of Sudbury, Massachusetts year ending December 31, 1992 Table of Contents Administration Dog Officer . 78 Federal, State And County Officials I Animal Inspector 78 Elected Town Officials . 2 Appointed Town Officials 3 Public Works Board of Selectmen .10 Resource Recovery Committee . 79 Town Report Committee .12 Wayland-Sudbury Septage Disposal Facility . 79 Personnel Board .13 Highway Surveyor, Tree Warden, Landfill Agent, Town Counsel .13 Superintendent of Cemeteries . 80 Town Moderator .!4 Planning And Development Town Clerk Board of Appeals 81 Town Clerk's Report .15 Conservation Commission 84 Audits ..... .17 Design Review Board . 86 !992 Town Meetings Summary .19 Metropolitan Area Planning Council (MAPC) and Minute- Elections . .23 man Advisory Group On Interlocal Coordination (MAGIC) 86 Finances Earth Removal Board . 87 Finance Committee .33 Town Engineer . 87 Town Treasurer and Collector .33 Negotiating Advisory Committee 87 Board of Assessors .44 Long Range Planning Committee 88 Town Accountant .37 Metrowest Growth Management Committee 89 Permanent Building Committee . 90 Permanent Landscape Committee 90 Education Planning Board . 90 Sudbury Public Schools . .45 Inclusionary Zoning Study Committee 92 Lincoln Sudbury Regional High School District .47 Hop Brook Ponds Study Committee 92 Minuteman Regional Vocational Technical School District . .55 In Memoriam ........... 93 Human Services Goodnow Library .
  • Continuous Forest Inventory 2014

    Continuous Forest Inventory 2014

    Manual for Continuous Forest Inventory Field Procedures Bureau of Forestry Division of State Parks and Recreation February 2014 Massachusetts Department Conservation and Recreation Manual for Continuous Forest Inventory Field Procedures Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation February, 2014 Preface The purpose of this manual is to provide individuals involved in collecting continuous forest inventory data on land administered by the Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation with clear instructions for carrying out their work. This manual was first published in 1959. It has undergone minor revisions in 1960, 1961, 1964 and 1979, and 2013. Major revisions were made in April, 1968, September, 1978 and March, 1998. This manual is a minor revision of the March, 1998 version and an update of the April 2010 printing. TABLE OF CONTENTS Plot Location and Establishment The Crew 3 Equipment 3 Location of Established Plots 4 The Field Book 4 New CFI Plot Location 4 Establishing a Starting Point 4 The Route 5 Traveling the Route to the Plot 5 Establishing the Plot Center 5 Establishing the Witness Trees 6 Monumentation 7 Establishing the Plot Perimeter 8 Tree Data General 11 Tree Number 11 Azimuth 12 Distance 12 Tree Species 12-13 Diameter Breast Height 13-15 Tree Status 16 Product 17 Sawlog Height 18 Sawlog Percent Soundness 18 Bole Height 19 Bole Percent Soundness 21 Management Potential 21 Sawlog Tree Grade 23 Hardwood Tree Grade 23 Eastern White Pine Tree Grade 24 Quality Determinant 25 Crown Class 26 Mechanical Loss