DOCSLIB.ORG

Acknowledgments

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Laidley Shire Council sincerely thanks the following: The Cultural Heritage Branch of the Queensland Environmental Protection Agency for providing funding for this first stage of the project. Marcus Richardson, Helen Bennett, Jo Bain, Robert Neal and Judy Powell of the EPA for providing valuable advice, encouragement, assistance and access to information throughout the project. The National Trust of Queensland and the Australian Heritage Commission for providing details of areas and places contained in their records. Laidley and District Historical Society for providing access to their library and for assisting in the identification of locally valued cultural heritage areas and places during the community survey. Lorraine Walker and Elizabeth Camplin for their untiring enthusiasm, assistance and support. All members of the community who participated in the community survey or provided information or assistance. This first stage of the Laidley Shire Cultural Heritage Assessment was funded by The Queensland Community Cultural Heritage Incentive Program, a State Government initiative administered by the Cultural Heritage Branch of the Queensland Environmental Protection Agency. The author also wishes to thank all the administrative and technical staff who assisted in the development and preparation of this report. 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report is presented to Laidley Shire Council and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and represents the completion of Stage One of the Laidley Shire Cultural Heritage Study. This report provides the results of the preliminary identification of historical cultural heritage areas and places in Laidley Shire. The Historical Context Report and this Report on the Preliminary Identification of the Historical Cultural Heritage of Laidley Shire have been developed as tools for future heritage studies and policy development. These reports aims to provide the following: · a basis for further identification and assessment of historical cultural heritage in the Laidley Shire; and · a basis for the development of Planning Scheme policies in relation to the management of this heritage. As well as this document, it is recommended that the following key legislation and documents be consulted in the preparation of new Planning Scheme policies relating to historical cultural heritage: · Australia ICOMOS Charter for the Conservation of Places of Cultural Significance (the Burra Charter); · Queensland Heritage Act 1992 (Qld); · Cultural Record (Landscapes Queensland and Queensland Estate) Act 1987 (Qld); · Integrated Planning Act 1997 (Qld); · EPA State Interest Planning Policy for Cultural Heritage (Historical) in Planning Schemes; · EPA Guidelines for Historical and Indigenous Cultural Heritage Management; and · SEQ Regional Framework for Growth Management 1998. This report also forms part of the process of information sharing between the EPA and Laidley Shire Council as agreed under the Research Inventory of Historical Places Protocol. 2 REPORT STRUCTURE ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ....................................................................................................................................................1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................................2 1. INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................................................................5 1.1 OBJECTIVES AND PRODUCTS OF THE LAIDLEY SHIRE CULTURAL HERITAGE STUDY..........................................5 1.2 REPORT STRUCTURE ......................................................................................................................................................9 2 BACKGROUND TO STUDY ....................................................................................................................................... 10 2.1 THE VALUE OF HISTORICAL CULTURAL HERITAGE .............................................................................10 2.2 STATE AND REGIONAL DIMENSIONS............................................................................................................11 2.2.1 EPA State Interest Planning Policy for Cultural Heritage (Historical)................................................... 11 2.2.2 South East Queensland Regional Framework for Growth Management 1998........................................ 12 3 THE LAIDLEY HISTORICAL CULTURAL HERITAGE STUDY: STAGE ONE ................................... 13 3.1 METHODOLOGY......................................................................................................................................................14 3.2 LIMITATIONS ............................................................................................................................................................15 3.3. FINDINGS – DESKTOP AUDIT ...........................................................................................................................16 3.3.1 STATE AND NATIONAL REGISTERS ........................................................................................................... 16 3.3.2 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY RESEARCH INVENTORY OF HISTORICAL PLACES (QCHIP) ......................................................................................................................................................................... 18 3.3.3 STATE AND REGIONAL CULTURAL HERITAGE STUDIES .................................................................. 18 3.4 TOURISM FEATURES .............................................................................................................................................23 3.5 FINDINGS - PRELIMINARY COMMUNITY SURVEY ..................................................................................25 3.6 FINDINGS – ADDITIONAL SITES.......................................................................................................................28 4. PRIORITIES FOR FURTHER STUDY .................................................................................................................. 28 4.1 METHODOLOGICAL CONCERNS...................................................................................................................................28 4.2 HISTORICAL THEMES...................................................................................................................................................29 4.3 PLACES AND LANDSCAPES..........................................................................................................................................34 4.4 CHARACTER AREAS.....................................................................................................................................................35 4.5 AREAS OF INTEREST .....................................................................................................................................................35 5 RECOMMENDATIONS................................................................................................................................................ 36 5.1 FURTHER STUDY...........................................................................................................................................................36 5.2 PLANNING SCHEME PROVISIONS/MANAGEMENT ....................................................................................................36 6 CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................................................................. 39 APPENDIX I: TYPOLOGIES OF ASSOCIATED PLACES OF POTENTIAL CULTURAL HERITAGE SIGNIFICANCE.................................................................................................................................................................. 42 APPENDIX II: COMPLETE LIST OF IDENTIFIED KNOWN AND POTENTIAL HISTORICAL CULTURAL HERITAGE IN LAIDLEY SHIRE ...................................................................................................... 48 APPENDIX III: MAP OF LAIDLEY SHIRE SHOWING KNOWN AND POTENTIAL SIGNIFICANT HISTORICAL CULTURAL HERITAGE................................................................................................................... 54 APPENDIX IV: LAIDLEY SHIRE ENTRIES IN THE QUEENSLAND HERITAGE REGISTER ......... 55 APPENDIX V: EPA RES EARCH INVENTORY OF HISTORICAL PLACES PROTOCOL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY....................................................................................................... 69 APPENDIX VI: LAIDLEY SHIRE ENTRIES IN THE EPA’S RESEARCH INVENTORY OF HISTORICAL PLACES (QCHIP) ................................................................................................................................. 71 3 APPENDIX VII: EXTRACTS FROM REPORTS HELD BY THE CULTURAL HERITAGE BRANCH OF THE EPA........................................................................................................................................................................ 72 Extract from: Historic Post Offices in Queensland: a National Estate Study (1993), Department of Architecture, University of Queensland.................................................................................................................... 73 Extract from: Ward,A and Milner, P (1997) Queensland Railway Heritage Places Study: Stage 2, Department of Environment and Heritage and
Recommended publications
  • June 2014 Queensland Branch Newsletter

    June 2014 Queensland Branch Newsletter

    June 2014 Queensland Branch Newsletter Presidents Report By Col Lewis Branch News successful event, even given the quiet times we are experiencing in the Water sector. This event was My two-year term as Branch President finishes at the another wonderful opportunity to foster and share end June 2014 and on reflection I wonder where the knowledge as well as to catch up with other water two years has gone. professional from around Australia and Overseas that I would like to take this opportunity to firstly thank our you do not get to see at other times. Branch Manager, Sharon Ible, for all her assistance throughout my term and certainly without her efforts Industry our branch would not have been as successful as it has been, she certainly keeps the committee in order. As an Association we recently had the opportunity to provide feedback on the State Governments draft Also I have been fortunate over the two years to have a WATERQ, a 30-year Strategy for Queensland’s water wonderful committee to work with everybody being sector, which is due for release soon. involved and committed. Their support and hard work has made my role so much easier and I count it as a Some sectors of the Water industry are still very privilege to have had the opportunity to lead such a subdued and a lot of companies are feeling the pain of great team over the last two years. lack of projects where as others are going well. Unfortunately all levels of Government are looking at Would be remiss of me not to acknowledge those who deferring investment in capital works and this is led the branch before and their excellent work that we certainly not helping the situation.
  • Item 3 Bremer River and Waterway Health Report

    Item 3 Bremer River and Waterway Health Report

    Waterway Health Strategy Background Report 2020 Ipswich.qld.gov.au 2 CONTENTS A. BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT ...................................................................................................................................4 PURPOSE AND USE ...................................................................................................................................................................4 STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT ................................................................................................................................................... 6 LEGISLATIVE AND PLANNING FRAMEWORK..................................................................................................................7 B. IPSWICH WATERWAYS AND WETLANDS ............................................................................................................... 10 TYPES AND CLASSIFICATION ..............................................................................................................................................10 WATERWAY AND WETLAND MANAGEMENT ................................................................................................................15 C. WATERWAY MANAGEMENT ACTION THEMES .....................................................................................................18 MANAGEMENT THEME 1 – CHANNEL ..............................................................................................................................20 MANAGEMENT THEME 2 – RIPARIAN CORRIDOR .....................................................................................................24
  • Toowoomba Range Clearance Upgrade Works

    Toowoomba Range Clearance Upgrade Works

    Toowoomba Range Clearance Upgrade Works notice Queensland Rail is preparing for tunnel floor lowering works through 1 rail tunnels on the Toowoomba Range and Little Liverpool Range. This project is being undertaken to provide clearance for international standard size containers which will support the agricultural industry by enabling the transport of agricultural freight via rail from the Darling Downs and South West regions of Queensland through to the Port of Brisbane. In addition, works will also be carried out at two sites on the Toowoomba Range to secure identified sections of slope to enable the ongoing safe operation of rail traffic in this area. What is involved? During scheduled track closures in January and February 2017, Queensland Rail will undertake site investigation works at all 11 tunnel locations and two slope stabilisation sites. These works will involve visual inspections and drilling activities and will be undertaken from 6am to 6pm each day between: • Saturday 14 to Sunday 15 January • Friday 27 to Sunday 29 January • Saturday 25 to Sunday 26 February. Vehicles will be accessing the Toowoomba Range rail corridor via a number of locations including Murphys Creek Road (adjacent to Morleys Road), McCormack Drive and Donnellys Road. Following these site investigation works and upon completion of the project design, it is anticipated that major construction works will commence in mid-2017. Construction impacts Residents in close proximity to the rail corridor may experience an increase in noise during planned works. Queensland Rail apologises in advance for any temporary inconvenience generated by these works. Queensland Rail Limited ABN 71 132 Queensland Rail Limited Works location Nine of the 11 tunnels are located on the Toowoomba Range, indicated by blue arrows in the image below.
  • Door Awning : PA Series

    Door Awning : PA Series

    DOOR AWNING : PA SERIES Owner’s Manual For safety reasons, please carefully read and understand all written instructions and warnings in this manual prior to assembling or installing this product. TABLE OF CONTENTS Safety instructions and warnings........................................... 2 Package contents and parts .............................................. 3 Tool requirements ...................................................... 4 Product features ....................................................... 5 Installation Determine door awning location ..................................... 5 Assemble the door awning ......................................... 6 Install the door awning ............................................ 9 Maintenance.......................................................... 12 Warranty............................................................. 13 1 www.advaning.com Toll Free (US): (855) 574-0158 SAFETY INSTRUCTIONS AND WARNINGS • For safety concerns, please keep children away from the assembly area and from the assembly components. • Please properly dispose of all packing materials. • Consult with your local authorities if any permits are required prior to installation of Door Awning. • Follow all manufacturer’s safety instructions when using step ladders and/or power tools during installation. • Do not drill into walls where electric wiring, gas or water pipes may exist. • Please ensure that all screws are properly tighten when assembling the Door Awning. This product is intended for residential use only.
  • Planning Report Template

    Planning Report Template

    ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REPORT 54-56 OTTO ROAD & 29-33 GEHRKE ROAD, PLAINLAND BRISBANE CATHOLIC EDUCATION October 2018 Level 2, 1 Breakfast Creek Road, Newstead QLD 4006 PO Box 436 New Farm QLD 4005 P: (07) 3666 5200 F: (07) 3666 5202 [email protected] ABN: 63 366 350 062 © Wolter Consulting Group 2018 This document is and shall remain the property of Wolter Consulting Group. The document may only be used for the purposes for which it was commissioned and in accordance with the Terms of Engagement for the commission. Unauthorised use of this document in any form whatsoever is prohibited. REVISION REPORT TYPE AUTHOR REVIEWED SIGNATURE DATE OF ISSUE 1.0 EAR M.WOOD J.ISAAC 5th October 2018 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY With reference to section 36(3) of the Planning Act 2016, the below sets out the matters required as part of the infrastructure proposal and prepared in accordance with the Minister’s Guidelines and Rules, Chapter 7—Guidelines for the process for environmental assessment and consultation for making or amending a ministerial designation. Table A: Infrastructure Designation Matters Matters Response a) the site description including the location of the premises proposed to be Property Address 54-56 Otto Road & 29-33 Gehrke Road, Plainland designated; Property Description Lot 3 on RP154611 Lot 4 on RP154611 Lot 5 on RP154611 Lot 601 on SP283422 Area 18.452ha Tenure Freehold Existing Use Dwelling House and Domestic Outbuildings b) any existing uses on the premises proposed to be designated; The site currently contains a number of dwelling houses, dams and associated domestic outbuildings.
  • Evolution of the Ipswich Railway Workshops Site

    Evolution of the Ipswich Railway Workshops Site

    VOLUME 5 PART 1 MEMOIRS OF THE QUEENSLAND MUSEUM – CULTURE © The State of Queensland (Queensland Museum), 2011 PO Box 3300, South Brisbane 4101, Qld Australia Phone 61 7 3840 7555 Fax 61 7 3846 1226 www.qm.qld.gov.au National Library of Australia card number ISSN 1440-4788 NOTE Papers published in this volume and in all previous volumes of the Memoirs of the Queensland Museum may be reproduced for scientific research, individual study or other educational purposes. Properly acknowledged quotations may be made but queries regarding the republication of any papers should be addressed to the Editor in Chief. Copies of the journal can be purchased from the Queensland Museum Shop. A Guide to Authors is displayed at the Queensland Museum web site http://www.qm.qld.gov.au/About+Us/Publications/Memoirs+of+the+Queensland+Museum A Queensland Government Project Typeset at the Queensland Museum Evolution of the Ipswich Railway Workshops site Robyn BUCHANAN Buchanan, R. 2011 Evolution of the Ipswich Railway Workshops Site. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum – Culture 5(1): 31-52. Brisbane. ISSN 1440-4788 The decision to build the first railway in Queensland from Ipswich to the Darling Downs meant that railway workshops were required at Ipswich. The development of the Ipswich Railway Workshops site began with the original Ipwich Workshops site of 1864 which was adjacent to the Bremer River at North Ipswich. The first two major workshop buildings were iron and zinc structures imported from England in pre-fabricated form. Over the next few years, additional buildings including a brick store were constructed by local contractors.
  • Little Liverpool Range Initiative from Little Things, Big Things Grow What Is the Little Liverpool Range Initiative?

    Little Liverpool Range Initiative from Little Things, Big Things Grow What Is the Little Liverpool Range Initiative?

    Little Liverpool Range Initiative From Little Things, Big Things Grow What is the Little Liverpool Range Initiative? • A community based initiative that endeavours to connect and protect, habitat, species and people so that they all may survive and thrive Where is the Little Liverpool Range? • Extending from Hatton Vale in the north to Main Range National Park in the south, the Little Liverpool Range is 51 kilometres long and covers approx. 46,000 hectares Formation of the Little Liverpool Range? • Tertiary period (22 – 25 million years ago) • Numerous nearly horizontal lava flows, mainly of basalt, which erupted to gradually build a complex and elongated volcano. • Basalt lava flows have a low viscosity and tend to flow large distances forming gently sloping shield volcanoes (as opposed to classical steep sided peaks like Mt Fuji) • The Main Range & Little Liverpool Range shields formed part of a wider area of volcanic activity spreading northwards past Toowoomba and Kingaroy. • Other volcanoes of similar age include Mt Barney and the much larger Tweed Volcano whose remains form the Lamington Plateau and Border Ranges. • The Main Range volcano is believed to have spread as far east as the Kalbar - Boonah and northeast to Rosewood The Paleocene Epoch Australia is joined to The condylarths-ancestors 65 to 54 million years ago Antarctica of modern hoofed herbivores Tertiary Period Rodents The first Primates The Eocene Epoch Europe and North Bats 54 to 38 million years ago America separate Elephant ancestors Due to its long-term isolation (~40 million years) as an Whales island continent, the vast majority of Australia’s native Eohippus-the first horse The Oligocene Epoch Australia separates Dogs, cats, and pigs marsupial (93%), rodent (91%) and microbat (73%) 38 to 24 million years ago from Antarctica toothed whales species are found nowhere else.
  • Queensland Rail

    Queensland Rail

    Queensland Rail T 07 3072 0781 ^pQueenslandRall 305 Edward Street F 07 3072 7201 GPO Box 1429 E [email protected] Brisbane QLD 4001 www.queenslandrail.com.au Ourref: MCR-18-319 Mr Charles Millsteed Chief Executive Officer Queensland Competition Authority Level 27 145 Ann Street Brisbane QLD 4000 Dear Mr Millsteed Queensland Rail's Access Undertaking 1 (AU1) requires that Queensland Rail provide the Queensland Competition Authority (QCA) with details of capital expenditure for the subject year that Queensland Rail considers should be included in the Regulatory Asset Base (RAB). Queensland Rail provided the 2013-14 to 2016-17 Capital Expenditure Report for the West Moreton Network to the QCA on 21 December 2017. The QCA's Final Decision on AU1 approved the West Moreton Network as at 1 July 2013 and the estimated capital expenditure to be included in the Capital Indicator for the period 1 July 2013 to 30 June 2020. This will be the first time the QCA considers capital expenditure for approval in the RAB since AU1 was approved. In subsequent communication between our officers, the QCA has sought evidence that assets included in the Capital Expenditure Report have been commissioned. Queensland Rail is now providing a revised estimate for the Capital Expenditure Report reflecting commissioned assets, as included in the Fixed Asset Register by year, as opposed to capital expenditure by year. The revised estimates are included in Attachment 1. Separately, Queensland Rail is providing the QCA with its records supporting the recognition of assets in the Fixed Asset Register. Consistent with the requirement of Clause 1.3(c) of AU1, I can confirm that the information contained in Attachment 1 in respect of the assets commissioned on the 2013-14 to 2016-17 Capital Expenditure Report is in all material respects correct.
  • PD-32 Design Guidelines

    PD-32 Design Guidelines

    PD-32:SOUTH DESIGN GUIDELINES September, 2009 PREPARED BY: COLLABORATORS: CLARK & GREEN ASSOCIATES CITY OF LONG BEACH ALTOON+PORTER ARCHITECTS THE BOEING M C CLARAND VASQUEZ COMPANY EMSIEK & PARTNERS Th e Vision “Douglas Park” will turn an outdated and obsolete aircraft manufacturing facility into a vibrant mixed-use, pedestrian friendly community that combines the best elements of the older established planning traditions of Long Beach with the contemporary realities of business, retailing and modern lifestyles. “Douglas Park” will be focused on the shared public environment; from walkable tree lined streets, to a human scaled mixed-use “Main Street” with shopping, dining and other services, along with a variety of neighborhood open spaces, quality architecture, pedestrian connections and bicycle trails. At the same time, “Douglas Park” will incorporate the workplace, including a balanced blend of offi ce and other commercial opportunities to provide much needed employment. Service and recreational land uses will be located within comfortable walking distance of commercial areas to enhance the sense of community, off er unique lifestyle choices and reduce automobile dependence. “Douglas Park” will celebrate the products, the events, and the people who made history on the site through the incorporation of this memory into everyday living. Th is legacy will be remembered through a Public Art Master Plan designed to “tell the story” of the site in public areas such as open spaces, pedestrian paths, sidewalks, streets and parkways. “Douglas Park” represents a deliberate eff ort to establish a strong sense of community rather than an isolated aggregation of projects, by emphasizing neighborhoods rather than subdivisions, a main street rather than a shopping center and a mixed-use commercial district rather than a business park.
  • Fairways Park Sketch Design LANDSCAPE CONCEPT SKETCH MASTER PLAN REPORT LOCKYER VALLEY REGIONAL COUNCIL - 4 SEPTEMBER 2019 INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND

    Fairways Park Sketch Design LANDSCAPE CONCEPT SKETCH MASTER PLAN REPORT LOCKYER VALLEY REGIONAL COUNCIL - 4 SEPTEMBER 2019 INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND

    Fairways Park Sketch Design LANDSCAPE CONCEPT SKETCH MASTER PLAN REPORT LOCKYER VALLEY REGIONAL COUNCIL - 4 SEPTEMBER 2019 INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND WHY ARE WE HERE Excitingly, the Lockyer Valley Regional Council is currently developing a new district park in the Hatton Vale/ Kensington Grove region. Council is currently finalising a contract to secure 14 hectares of land to develop a high-quality park in a stage approached. THE SITE LOCATION The provision of parkland and open space for recreation and sporting purposes in the rural residential area of Hatton Vale/ Kensington Grove. This future public park will facilitate the long term need for the area, as well as surrounding suburbs in the Lockyer Valley Region. In 2016 the Brightview, Glenore Grove, Hatton Vale, Kensington Grove, Lockrose, Plainland and Regency Downs area accounted for 24.3% of the Lockyer Valley Region’s population with a figure of 9,398. Based on Queensland Treasury projections there is the possibility that the land available in this region could house up to another 6,000 residents. KENSINGTON KEY DOCUMENTS GROVE The landscape design options have been informed from the following documents: - GenEng Design Report (Option 2 preferred option) - Laidley Planning Scheme with LGIP 20180627, WARREGO HWY - Project Inception Meeting Minutes_April 2019 HATTON - Lockyer Valley Sports and Recreation Plan_Draft VALE - Community Consultation Feedback SUNSHINE COAST COUNCIL SOMERSET MORETON REGIONAL BAY REGIONAL COUNCIL COUNCIL BRISBANE CITY LOCKYER COUNCIL TOOWOOMBA RED LAND VALLEY REGIONAL IPSWICH CITY CITY COUNCIL REGIONAL COUNCIL COUNCIL COUNCIL LOGAN CITY COUNCIL SCENIC RIM GOLD COAST REGIONAL CITY COUNCIL COUNCIL 04/09/2019 | Lockyer Valley Regional Council Fairways Park Sketch Design Wolter Consulting Group | 2 VISION & PLACEMAKING THE VISION LVRC has a need for a District Park.
  • Biodiversity Strategy a Ten Year Strategy for the Conservation of Biodiversity in the Scenic Rim

    Biodiversity Strategy a Ten Year Strategy for the Conservation of Biodiversity in the Scenic Rim

    BIODIVERSITY STRATEGY A TEN YEAR STRATEGY FOR THE CONSERVATION OF BIODIVERSITY IN THE SCENIC RIM 2015 - 2025 / DRAFT Page 2 | Biodiversity Strategy | Scenic Rim Regional Council CONTENTS A MESSAGE FROM THE MAYOR ..................................................................4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................6 ABBREVIATIONS .............................................................................................8 THE IMPORTANCE OF BIODIVERSITY ...........................................................9 What is Biodiversity? ...................................................................................................... 9 MEETING LEGISLATIVE OBLIGATIONS .......................................................11 THE STORY OF BIODIVERSITY IN THE SCENIC RIM ..................................12 Plants ............................................................................................................................ 13 Vertebrate Animals ....................................................................................................... 14 Invertebrate Animals ..................................................................................................... 16 Diversity of Vegetation .................................................................................................. 16 Poorly Conserved Ecosystems .................................................................................... 16 Core Bushland, Critical Corridors and Stepping Stones
  • Requirements for the Construction of Awning Enclosures in Special Occupancy Parks

    Requirements for the Construction of Awning Enclosures in Special Occupancy Parks

    Requirements for the Construction of Awning Enclosures in Special Occupancy Parks The following items are needed to apply for an HCD accessory building or structure permit: Review and complete an Application for Permit to Construct (HCD 50) included in this handout. Follow the instructions on the back of the form and make sure that park management signs section #5. This application requires an original (wet) signature of the management along with two copies. The application for the permit to construct shall be accompanied by fees as specified on the fee schedule when using the approved plan in this handout. Any deviation from the included plans will require a plan check and plan check fees. Review and complete a Lot Plot Plan (HCD 538) included in handout, indicating where the accessory building or structure is to be constructed on the lot to include dimensions of the structure, setbacks from lot lines, and separations from other structures. Follow the instructions on the back of the form and make sure that park management signs the “STATEMENT OF RESPONSIBILITY” on the front of this document. This application also requires an original (wet) signature of the management along with two copies. Review and complete the “Classification of Fire Hazard Severity Zone” form to determine if you are located in a Fire Hazard Severity Zone or a Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area (WUI). An accessory building or structure shall be designed and constructed to withstand the snow loads for the area where it is constructed and comply with sections 1433 &1433.1. Submit the completed and signed permit and plot plan along with two copies to the office listed on the back of the Permit to Construct in addition to the following documentation: Three (3) complete sets of plans and specifications for the work to be performed.