DOCSLIB.ORG

A Provincial Historic Resource by Larry Pearson

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Provincial Historic Resource by Larry Pearson ROSSDALE POWER PLANT A Provincial Historic Resource by Larry Pearson Summary EPCOR's proposal to construct a new gas turbine unit at its Rossdale Power Plant in Edmonton's river valley was the subject of extensive public hearings and debate.A critical issue was EPCOR's proposal to demolish the architecturally significant /932-1954 Low Pressure Power Plant designed by Maxwell Dewar, a prominent Alberta architect. This article examines Alberta Community Development's regulatory role, its use of an historic resource impact assessment to confirm the significance of the Low Pressure Power Plant building, and its evaluation, in conjunction with the Guidelines for the Rehabilitation of Designated Historic Resources, of the appropriateness of a range of options for placement of the new unit on the site. Sommaire Le projet d'EPCOR visant la construction d'une nouvelle turbine a gaz a la centra/e Rossda/e, dans la vallee d'Edmonton, a suscite force debats et consultations publiques. L'un des aspects des de ce dossier etait qu'EPCOR proposait de demolir la centra/e a faible pression /932-/954 (1932-1954 Low Pressure Power Plant) confue par Maxwell Dewar, eminent architecte de /'Alberta. Cet article porte sur le role reg/ementaire de /'organisme de developpement communautaire Alberta Community Development, son recours a un examen de /'incidence historique pour confirmer /'importance du batiment menace et son evaluation, se/on Jes directives sur la remise en etat des ressources historiques designees (Guidelines for the Rehabilitation of Designated Historic Resources), du bien-fonde des diverses options visant /'emplacement de la nouvelle turbine. n October 17,200 I, the Alberta resources. It has the authority to order provincial historic resources where O government designated a number that assessments of the consequences preservation is in the public interest. of buildings on Edmonton's Rossdale of projects on historic resources be Registered historic resources are Power Plant site as provincial historic carried out and that salvage, preservation protected for 90 days; disturbance of resources. The structures were owned or protective measures be undertaken. provincial historic resources without by EPCOR, a private utility company. On The Act also provides for the designation the prior written approval of Alberta October 25, 200 I, EPCOR announced of historic resources as registered or Community Development is prohibited. that, as a result of this designation, it would not proceed with its proposed construction of a new gas turbine generating unit at the Rossdale Power Plant. Key for the designation was the completion of a comprehensive historical resource impact assessment establishing the significance of three of the existing structures according to provincial criteria, identifying and articulating their character­ defining features, and analyzing the impact of the proposed construction against provincial conservation standards. Alberta Community Development, operating under the Historical Resources Act,' is the department responsible for coordinating the orderly development, View from the south of the Maxwell Dewor LP Plant building at the Rossdale Power Plant site. The large multi-stacked preservation, promotion, and study and structure is the Maxwell Dewar Low Pressure Plant, its associated pump house is the smaller concrete building in the interpretation of Alberta's historic foreground adjacent to the river. The sites Administration building (also designated) is obscured by trees to the right of the LP Plant. Credit: Larry Pearson of Alberta Community Development. Plan Summer/~te 2003 ~ I Through the Guidelines for the Rehabilitation architectural interest.A site evaluated as in the hearings allowed the department of Designated Historic Resources,2 the "excellent" is considered to merit designa­ to gain first-hand knowledge of the department provides guidance on the tion as a Provincial Historic Resource. public's concern regarding the project's sensitive treatment of designated impact on heritage resources. Whiting also reviewed four options for heritage resources. the placement of the new generating In making their final arguments to the In January 1999, EPCOR's proposal to unit on the site using Alberta's "Criteria Energy Board hearings, department staff develop a new gas turbine generator at for the Protection of Historic Resources" concurred with Whiting's two principal its Rossdale site triggered an environmental outlined in the Guidelines. Critical to recommendations.As a result, designation impact assessment. The project involved the application of the criteria were the of the historic generating plant, adminis­ the construction of a large gas turbine report's clearly written "heritage character tration building and pump house as unit on the site and the demolition of statements" and "heritage character­ provincial historic resources would be the Rossdale generating plant (Figure I) defining features" for each of the recommended. The department would built between 1938 and 1954. The site buildings determined to have heritage also recommend that ministerial approval was listed as an "A" category site on significance. The resulting analysis be given for demolishing only the portions the City of Edmonton's Register of concluded that while all four options of the historic plant necessary to enable Historic Resources. The proposal also called would have a significant impact on the construction of the new unit.Alberta for significant excavation work in an historic plant, consideration should be Community Development's position in area that might possibly be the site of given to a plan that would see demolition this regard reflected criteria 4, Historic early versions of Fort Edmonton ( 180 I minimized to that essential for the Character, in the department's Guidelines: onward), which represents the first construction of the new generating unit. 'The distinctive qualities and character of European settlement in the area. In a site should be preserved. The removal addition early, deeply buried, prehistoric "The distinctive qualities or alteration of any historic materials or archaeological material might be and character of a site features should be avoided whenever encountered. Owing to the significance possible:'2 <P- 1•l of the buildings on the site (as evidenced should be preserved. The On May 8, 200 I , the Energy Board by the City of Edmonton's "A" listing) removal or alteration of approved EPCOR's application for a and the high probability of encountering any historic materials or 170-megawatt natural-gas-fired turbine archaeological material, EPCOR was features should be avoided at the Rossdale Power Plant. The Energy formally required to undertake two 2 14 Board concluded that the consequences historical resource impact assessments whenever possible." <P• > related to the project's impact on in conjunction with the environmental archaeological and architectural resources assessment. The purpose of one of the The archaeological study confirmed that would be properly regulated by Alberta assessments was to deal with the the site possessed significant archaeological Community Development. significance and consequences of potential resources dating from the earliest Fort mitigation strategies for the site's 1930 Edmonton, including palisade lines and On June 18, 200 I, Alberta Community administration building, 1938 pump cellar depressions. It also indicated that Development issued a "notice of intention" house and the generating plant. The aim the extensive and long-term use of the to designate the historic buildings at the of the second assessment was to assess site for industrial purposes had affected Rossdale Site as provincial historical the potential impact on the site's these resources significantly. In the end, resources. The Notice of Intention was archaeological resources. Of the two, the government's position was that the the subject of a hearing before the Alberta the architectural study dealing with the remains of the early Fort Edmonton Historical Resources Foundation Board historic structures was most influential were in such a disturbed context that of Directors on August 27 and 28, 200 I. in the site's designation. their designation would not be in the EPCOR and Alberta Community public interest. Development were two of 15 groups Architect David Whiting, following Alberta that made representations to the Board. Community Development research From October 17 to November 3, 2000, The Historical Resources Act states that, guidelines, completed the study of the and from January 9 to 19,200 I, EPCOR's "If the Foundation after hearing structures located at the Rossdale Plant application to develop the new project representations recommends that the in 1999. His report evaluated the was the subject of public hearings before Minister proceed with the proposed significance of the Rossdale buildings the Alberta Energy and Utilities Board. designation, then the Minister may and concluded that, "The Low Pressure Information presented during the hearings proceed ... "•(~ 1•l The nature of the Board's Plant including the Boiler House, Turbine included the results of the environmental House, Switch House, Pumphouse #I, assessment, the historical resource recommendations to the minister are and the Administration Building represent impact assessment, and submissions from confidential. an important collection of structures approximately 20 interveners.Alberta Throughout June and July 200 I, government related to the history
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Candles to Kilowatts
    Candles to Kilowatts The Story of Edmonton’s Power Company Chapter 1 final 2/7/02 10:07 PM Page 1 lick a light switch, turn on a televi- Fsion, use a microwave – we take many electrical conveniences for granted. But Milestones Chapter 1 before the turn of the twentieth century, electricity was just a flickering novelty for most people. Since then, it has 1891 become central to our daily lives, a driv- Alex Taylor starts the first Edmonton ing force of modern industry, and a electric plant in Edmonton. multi-billion dollar enterprise. And for Electric Lighting people in Edmonton, a home-grown The C&E Railway between Calgary utility has made electricity a reality for and South Edmonton is completed. and Power more than a century. Company Limited Edmonton’s Early 1892 Growth Edmonton is incorporated as a town. • • • • • Edmonton Electric Lighting and Power Company Limited has its roots in the 1895 1891 – 1901 early history of the City of Edmonton. John Walter’s sawmill business is Like other cities in western Canada, operational in Edmonton. Edmonton began as a fur trading post. After relocating several times, Fort 1896 Edmonton was situated in the Edmonton Marconi applies for a patent on area in 1802, when it was erected on the wireless telegraphy. north bank of the North Saskatchewan River. In 1829, the fort was moved to The Klondike Gold higher ground near the present location Rush begins. It is a fact – or have I dreamt it – that, of Alberta’s legislature building. by means of electricity, the world of Fort Edmonton experienced two sepa- The first long-distance, high-voltage rate waves of newcomers.
    [Show full text]
  • Writing Alberta POD EPDF.Indd
    WRITING ALBERTA: Aberta Building on a Literary Identity Edited by George Melnyk and Donna Coates ISBN 978-1-55238-891-4 THIS BOOK IS AN OPEN ACCESS E-BOOK. It is an electronic version of a book that can be purchased in physical form through any bookseller or on-line retailer, or from our distributors. Please support this open access publication by requesting that your university purchase a print copy of this book, or by purchasing a copy yourself. If you have any questions, please contact us at [email protected] Cover Art: The artwork on the cover of this book is not open access and falls under traditional copyright provisions; it cannot be reproduced in any way without written permission of the artists and their agents. The cover can be displayed as a complete cover image for the purposes of publicizing this work, but the artwork cannot be extracted from the context of the cover of this specific work without breaching the artist’s copyright. COPYRIGHT NOTICE: This open-access work is published under a Creative Commons licence. This means that you are free to copy, distribute, display or perform the work as long as you clearly attribute the work to its authors and publisher, that you do not use this work for any commercial gain in any form, and that you in no way alter, transform, or build on the work outside of its use in normal academic scholarship without our express permission. If you want to reuse or distribute the work, you must inform its new audience of the licence terms of this work.
    [Show full text]
  • EPCOR POWER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Memorandum of Decision and EPCOR GENERATION INC
    ALBERTA ENERGY AND UTILITIES BOARD Calgary Alberta PREHEARING MEETING EPCOR POWER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Memorandum of Decision AND EPCOR GENERATION INC. Application No. 990289 ATCO PIPELINES Application No. 1055407 1 INTRODUCTION EPCOR Power Development Corporation and EPCOR Generation Inc., both wholly owned subsidiaries of EPCOR Utilities Inc. (collectively, EPCOR), filed Application No. 990289 on June 25, 1999, requesting the approval of the Alberta Energy and Utilities Board (EUB/Board) to construct and operate a 170 megawatt natural gas-fired turbine, designated as Unit 11, at its Rossdale power plant in Edmonton. ATCO Pipelines (ATCO) filed Application No. 1055407 on December 19, 1999, requesting the approval of the EUB to construct and operate a new natural gas pipeline from its Edmonton Ethane Extraction plant to EPCOR’s Rossdale power plant. The proposed pipeline would have a 406 millimetre outside diameter, be approximately 9 kilometres in length, and would have a maximum operating pressure of 4964 kilopascals. The EUB directed that these applications be considered at a public hearing, which was originally scheduled to commence in Edmonton on May 24, 2000. The EUB also identified the need to conduct a prehearing meeting to consider the issues to be addressed, the timing of the hearing, and other preliminary matters to allow for hearing efficiency. The Board held a prehearing meeting in Edmonton, Alberta, on April 17, 2000, before J. D. Dilay, P.Eng. (Presiding Member), T. M. McGee (Board Member), and C. A. Langlo, P.Geol. (Acting Board Member). Those who appeared at the prehearing meeting, along with a list of abbreviations used in this memorandum of decision, are set out in Appendix A.
    [Show full text]
  • EPCOR Annual MD&A
    EPCOR Utilities Inc. Management’s Discussion and Analysis December 31, 2012 This management’s discussion and analysis (MD&A) dated March 5, 2013 should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements of EPCOR Utilities Inc. and its subsidiaries for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 and the cautionary statement regarding forward-looking information on pages 38 and 39 of this MD&A. In this MD&A, any reference to “the Company”, “EPCOR”, “it”, “its”, “we”, “our” or “us”, except where otherwise noted or the context otherwise indicates, means EPCOR Utilities Inc., together with its subsidiaries. In this MD&A, Capital Power refers to Capital Power Corporation and its directly and indirectly owned subsidiaries including Capital Power L.P., except where otherwise noted or the context otherwise indicates. Financial information in this MD&A is based on the audited consolidated financial statements, which were prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), and is presented in Canadian dollars unless otherwise specified. In accordance with its terms of reference, the Audit Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors reviews the contents of the MD&A and recommends its approval by the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors has approved this MD&A. OVERVIEW EPCOR is wholly-owned by The City of Edmonton (the City). EPCOR builds, owns and operates electrical transmission and distribution networks in Canada as well as water and wastewater treatment facilities and infrastructure in Canada and the United States (U.S.). EPCOR also provides electricity and water services and products to residential and commercial customers.
    [Show full text]
  • Edmonton's Heritage Community an Environmental Scan for The
    Edmonton’s Heritage Community An Environmental Scan for the Edmonton Arts Council Jane Ross, Principal Draft Report 19 May 2007 J. Ross & Associates 1 Table of Contents Page 1. Terms of Reference 4 2. Is Heritage Relevant? 5 3. Points to Ponder 6 4. Methodology 8 5. Edmonton’s Heritage Organizations 5.1 Overview 11 5.2 City Operated Facilities 4.2.1. City Archives 12 4.2.2 City Artifact Centre/Fort Edmonton Park 14 5.3 Role of City Planning and Development Department and the Edmonton Historical Board 4.3.1 Naming Committee 18 4.3.2 Ad hoc Committee, Fort Edmonton Cemetery 19 4.3.3 Historic Resources 20 5.4 Other Archives, Museums and Historical Societies 4.4.1 Funding 21 4.4.2 Staffing 22 4.4.3 Facilities 23 6. A Museum Network 6.1 Edmonton Regional Museums Network 25 6.2 A New Network 26 7. Role of Provincial Government Organizations 28 8. Role of Edmonton Tourism 29 9. Other Initiatives 9.1 Historical Research 9.1.1 Historian-in-Residence Programme 31 9.1.2 Publications 31 9.1.3 Awards 32 9.2 Public Art 32 9.3 Heritage Events 33 2 10. Appendices 10.1 Contact Information 35 10.2 Advocates 40 10.3 Facility and Organization Details 52 10.4 Hardcopy Information 131 3 1.0 Terms of Reference The Edmonton Arts Council has been directed by the City of Edmonton to draw up a Cultural Plan that will guide the policies, programmes and attitudes of the city for the next 10 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Becoming a Province
    ALB4SS_ch8_new_F 4/27/06 2:59 PM Page 206 CHAPTER 8 Becoming a Province ave you ever watched a parade in your community? HIf you have, you know how exciting it can be! On September 1, 1905, a great parade wound through the streets of Edmonton. People came from near and far to celebrate. Over 4000 people gathered to listen to Wilfrid Laurier, the prime minister of Canada. He was making a special announcement. A new province was being created in Western Canada—the province of Alberta! Prime Minister Laurier spoke of the future: “I see… in the citizens of the new province, the courage and the hope to face all the difficulties that arise in a new land….” 206 ALB4SS_ch8_new_F 4/27/06 2:59 PM Page 207 Alberta’s Story In 1905, Alberta became a province. New industries, towns, and cities began to grow. In this chapter, you will discover how and why this happened. You will find out how Alberta got its borders and its name. You will also learn how Alberta became a place where people from many different places felt they belonged. Stephen Avenue—a historic street in Calgary ? Inquiring Minds Here are some questions to guide your inquiry for this chapter: • How did Alberta become a province? • What do major events and stories tell us about Alberta’s past? If you want to know more, try some other sources. How can I use technology to help me with the research process? I will • gather information in computer files • use electronic webs, charts, or spreadsheets • record interviews • take photographs 207 ALB4SS_ch8_new_F 4/27/06 2:59 PM Page 208 How Did Alberta Become a Province? Imagine you are travelling in Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Touch the Water Promendate Project
    2 City of Edmonton Touch the Water Promenade Project​ | ​Frequently Asked Questions Table of Contents PROJECT INFORMATION 2 Where is this project located? 2 What has been funded for this project? 3 Why is the City doing this project? 3 What happened with the previous Touch the Water and North Shore Promenade work? 4 How much will this cost? 4 ENGAGEMENT 5 How are Indigenous Nations and Communities engaged? 5 What are the engagement opportunities? 5 How is engagement occurring during COVID-19? 6 How are decisions made? 6 ENVIRONMENTAL & TECHNICAL STUDIES 7 What type of technical studies and work are included in this project? 7 What environmental studies have been completed so far? What else will be completed? 7 What are the environmental findings? 8 What geotechnical work has been completed to date? 9 HISTORIC & CULTURAL RESOURCES 10 Are historical and cultural resources being considered? 10 What if human remains are found? 11 RELATED PROJECTS & CONSIDERATIONS 12 What is happening with the former Rossdale Power Plant and Pumphouses? 12 Does this project include renewing or changing River Valley Road? 13 What is the Gondola Proposal? 13 Is This Project Within the Flood Zone? 14 What is the Commonwealth Walkway? 14 3 City of Edmonton Touch the Water Promenade Project​ | ​Frequently Asked Questions PROJECT INFORMATION Where is this project located? The project is​ located ​along the northern bank of the North Saskatchewan River in Edmonton’s central river valley, across two distinct but connected project areas: ● The ​Rossdale Area​ is proposed to extend from 94 Avenue NW to the Walterdale Bridge.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological Society of Alberta Annual Conference
    Archaeological Society of Alberta Annual Conference May 1st, 2021 Self-Guided Field Trips Organized By ASA Edmonton Centre ASA Red Deer Centre ASA Bodo Centre ASA Calgary Centre ASA Lethbridge Centre ASA Southeastern Centre The six centres of the Archaeological Society of Alberta are pleased to offer you self-guided field trips for the afternoon portion of the 2021 ASA Annual Conference, held virtually this year. In lieu of the traditional field trip organized by the hosting centre, each centre has organized a self-guided walking or driving tour of local archaeological and historical sites for members to visit. You are invited to participate in the field trip at your own leisure. If you wish to visit field trips provided by the other centres, they are all provided in this packet. Happy and safe travels! The Archaeological Society of Alberta would like to acknowledge the Indigenous Peoples of all the lands that we are on today. We would like to take a moment to acknowledge the importance of the lands we share and call home. We do this to reaffirm our commitment and responsibility in improving relationships between nations and improving our own understanding of local Indigenous peoples and their cultures. This is the ancestral and unceded territory of the people of Treaty 4, 6, 7, 8, and 10 as well as the Métis homeland. Their histories, languages, and cultures have enhanced and continue to enrich our province and our organization. We acknowledge the harms and mistakes of the past and consider how we can move forward in a spirit of truth, reconciliation, and collaboration.
    [Show full text]
  • Promoting the Trolleybus in Edmonton
    NOTICE: This pdf document contains a number of complex graphics; it has been divided into two parts in order to speed downloading times. You have downloaded Part I of a two-part document. In order to read the complete document, you require both parts. Please ensure that you also download Part II. The Trolleybus in Edmonton: A Step Toward Better Public Transit and a Cleaner Environment An Information and Materials Package Written by Kevin Brown Produced for the Edmonton Trolley Coalition Affiliated with the TBus Group May 2001 Visit the Edmonton Trolley Coalition on-line at: http://www.geocities.com/trolley_coalition/ The advice, assistance, support and encouragement of the following individuals in the creation of this document is gratefully acknowledged: Dr. Margaret-Ann Armour, PhD, Professor of Chemistry, Assistant Chair, Department of Chemistry, University of Alberta Dr. John J. Bakker, PhD, Professor Emeritus of Civil Engineering, Vice-President West and Editor for Transport 2000 Canada, member of the former Edmonton LRT Advisory Board and the former Edmonton Trolley Operation Review Committee Ernest C. Bastide, President, Amalgamated Transit Union Local 569 Irvine Bell, Eur Ing, Chartered Mechanical Engineer, BSc CEng MIMechE CDipAF PGCE Ashley Bruce, MaRCA, DipAD, Broadcast Television Producer for Earth Report and Life Robert R. Clark, former Supervisor of the Transit Development Section, Edmonton Transit System Ian Fisher, BSc, BA, MA (Planning), Engineering Assistant, City of Vancouver Dr. John A. Kernahan, PhD, Professor of Physics, member of the former Edmonton LRT Advisory Board and the former Edmonton Trolley Operation Review Committee Angus J. McIntyre, Trolley Coach Operator, Coast Mountain Bus Company Jerry Paschen, Wind Song Power Co-op Robert W.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rossdale Power Plant Preservation and Renewal
    THE ROSSDALE POWER PLANT PRESERVATION AND RENEWAL Presented to Edmonton City Council, Executive Committee July 8, 2013 Rossdale ReGeneration Group THE ROSSDALE POWER PLANT: PRESERVATION AND RENEWAL ROSSDALE REGENERATION GROUP Summary & Recommendations In March of 2013 Edmonton City Council and EPCOR began to review the status and viability of the decommissioned Rossdale Power Plant. The Rossdale Power Plant is the oldest and largest Power Plant of its kind in Alberta and also occupies one of the most historically important sites in Edmonton with a wealth of archaeological layers from 8000 year-old aboriginal gathering grounds and burial sites to fur trader-era fort structures. The Power Plant is a registered Provincial Historic Resource. For many Edmontonians, the Rossdale Power Plant is both an industrial building that provided households with electricity, and the “unofficial” entrance to the north side and Edmonton’s downtown. It is an iconic building that Edmontonians immediately identify as part of the city’s landscape. The interest of City Council in the long-term viability of the Rossdale Power Plant was seen by a number of people as both a challenge and an opportunity. Beginning in March, a number of individuals, some from community organizations, others from heritage and architectural groups, others simply individuals with interest in history and the river valley, came together and formed the voluntary Rossdale ReGeneration Group. Over the past four months the Rossdale ReGeneration Group has · Encouraged and included many interested
    [Show full text]
  • River Crossing Business Plan Received by Edmonton City Council September 10, 2019 River Crossing Project River Crossing Business Plan Iii Figure 1 - Context
    River Crossing Business Plan Received by Edmonton City Council September 10, 2019 River Crossing Project River Crossing Business Plan iii Figure 1 - Context Territorial Acknowledgement Edmonton is located within Treaty 6 Territory and The City of Edmonton owes its strength within the traditional territories of the Nehiyaw and vibrancy to these lands and the diverse (Cree), Denesuliné (Dene), Niitsitapi (Blackfoot), Indigenous peoples whose ancestors’ footsteps Anishinaabe (Ojibwe/Saulteaux), Nakota Sioux have marked this territory as well as the other (Stoney) and Haudenosaunee (Iroquois). The city Indigenous peoples and waves of Settlers also lies within the Métis’ homeland and Métis from around the world who continue to be Nation of Alberta Region IV. The lands on which welcomed here and call Edmonton home. present-day Edmonton sits, and the mighty North Saskatchewan River that runs through them, have The success of a new vision for River Crossing been the sites of natural abundance, ceremony must recognize the honoured traditions and culture, travel and rest, relationship-building, and cultural importance of this area to First making and trading for Indigenous peoples over Nations and Métis peoples as well as the millennia. The flats of the North Saskatchewan historical significance to Edmonton and our River, including those known today as Rossdale, collective aspirations for this area and future have been a significant site of these activities. generations. © Google 2017 River Crossing Business Plan v Acknowledgements Project Team
    [Show full text]
  • Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree Of
    SACRED LANDSCAPE: DIVISION AND CONVERGENCE BETWEEN PAST AND PROGRESS by Teague A. McCrae Submitted in partial fulfi lment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Architecture at Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia July 2013 © Copyright by Teague Armstrong McCrae, 2013 CONTENTS Abstract ............................................................................................................................ iii Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................... iv Chapter 1: Introduction .....................................................................................................1 Chapter 2: Remaining Signifi cant ......................................................................................3 Chapter 3: Historical Background..................................................................................... .5 The River ......................................................................................................................5 Changing Uses .............................................................................................................6 Sacred History ..............................................................................................................8 Recent History...............................................................................................................9 Chapter 4: Cultural Landscape.........................................................................................14 Chapter
    [Show full text]