DOCSLIB.ORG

Case M.8797 Thales/ Gemalto Merger Procedure

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

EUROPEAN COMMISSION

DG Competition

CASE M.8797 THALES/ GEMALTO

(Only the English text is authentic)

MERGER PROCEDURE
REGULATION (EC) 139/2004

Article 8(2) Regulation (EC) 139/2004
Date: 11/12/2018

This text is made available for information purposes only. A summary of this decision is

published in all EU languages in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Parts of this text have been edited to ensure that confidential information is not disclosed; those parts are enclosed in square brackets.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION

Brussels, 11.12.2018 C(2018) 8401 final

PUBLIC VERSION
COMMISSION DECISION of 11.12.2018 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the internal market and the EEA agreement

(Case M.8797 Thales / Gemalto)

(Only the English text is authentic)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

  • 1.
  • Introduction.................................................................................................................. 8

The Parties and the Transaction ................................................................................... 9 Union dimension.......................................................................................................... 9 The procedure............................................................................................................... 9 The investigation........................................................................................................ 10 The enterprise key management solution sector ........................................................ 10 Introduction................................................................................................................ 11
2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 6.1. 6.1.1. HSMs.......................................................................................................................... 11 6.1.2. HSMs aaS and cloud-based key management solutions offered aaS......................... 11 6.2. 6.3. 6.4. 6.5. 6.6. 7.
Manufacturers of HSMs............................................................................................. 12 Distribution channels ................................................................................................. 13 Cloud service providers.............................................................................................. 14 Standards and certification......................................................................................... 15 Regulatory developments........................................................................................... 16 Relevant markets........................................................................................................ 17 Introduction................................................................................................................ 17 Hardware Security Modules....................................................................................... 17
7.1. 7.2. 7.2.1. Product market definition........................................................................................... 17 7.2.1.1. Commission precedents ............................................................................................. 17 7.2.1.2. Notifying Party's views .............................................................................................. 17 A. B.
Overall market for KMS ............................................................................................ 17 GP and Payment HSMs.............................................................................................. 19
7.2.1.3. Commission's assessment .......................................................................................... 19 A. B. C. D.
HSMs and other cloud-based KMS............................................................................ 19 HSMs and other KMS (TPM or microprocessors) .................................................... 20 HSMs and HSM aaS .................................................................................................. 20 GP HSMs and Payment HSMs .................................................................................. 21
7.2.1.4. Conclusion on the product market definition............................................................. 22 7.2.2. Geographic market definition .................................................................................... 22 7.2.2.1. Commission precedents ............................................................................................. 22 7.2.2.2. Notifying Party's views .............................................................................................. 23 7.2.2.3. Commission's assessment .......................................................................................... 23 7.2.2.4. Conclusion on the geographic market definition ....................................................... 23 7.2.3. Overall conclusion on market definition.................................................................... 24

  • 7.3.
  • Enterprise Encryption Software ................................................................................. 24

2
7.3.1. Product market definition........................................................................................... 25 7.3.1.1. Commission precedents ............................................................................................. 25 7.3.1.2. Notifying Party's views .............................................................................................. 26 7.3.1.3. Commission's assessment .......................................................................................... 27 7.3.1.4. Conclusion on the product market definition............................................................. 28 7.3.2. Geographic market definition .................................................................................... 28 7.3.2.1. Notifying Party's views .............................................................................................. 28 7.3.2.2. Commission's assessment .......................................................................................... 29 7.3.2.3. Conclusion on the geographic market definition ....................................................... 29 7.3.3. Overall conclusion on market definition.................................................................... 30

  • 7.4.
  • Security evaluation services....................................................................................... 30

7.4.1. Product market definition........................................................................................... 30 7.4.1.1. Notifying Party's views .............................................................................................. 30 7.4.1.2. Commission's assessment .......................................................................................... 31 7.4.1.3. Conclusion on the product market definition............................................................. 31 7.4.2. Geographic market definition .................................................................................... 31 7.4.2.1. Notifying Party's views .............................................................................................. 31 7.4.2.2. Commission's assessment .......................................................................................... 31 7.4.2.3. Conclusion on the geographic market definition ....................................................... 32 7.4.3. Overall conclusion on market definition.................................................................... 32

  • 7.5.
  • SIM Cards, OTA SIM Card Administration and GSM-R integration ....................... 32

7.5.1. Product market definition........................................................................................... 32 7.5.1.1. Notifying Party's views .............................................................................................. 32 7.5.1.2. Commission's assessment .......................................................................................... 33 7.5.1.3. Conclusion on the product market definition............................................................. 33 7.5.2. Geographic market definition .................................................................................... 33 7.5.2.1. Notifying Party's views .............................................................................................. 33 7.5.2.2. Commission's assessment .......................................................................................... 34 7.5.2.3. Conclusion on the geographic market definition ....................................................... 34 7.5.3. Overall conclusion on market definition.................................................................... 34

  • 7.6.
  • Access control smart cards......................................................................................... 35

7.6.1. Product market definition........................................................................................... 35 7.6.1.1. Notifying Party's views .............................................................................................. 35 7.6.1.2. Commission's assessment .......................................................................................... 35 7.6.1.3. Conclusion on the product market definition............................................................. 36 7.6.2. Geographic market definition .................................................................................... 36 7.6.2.1. Notifying Party's views .............................................................................................. 36

3
7.6.2.2. Commission's assessment .......................................................................................... 36 7.6.2.3. Conclusion on the geographic market definition ....................................................... 36 7.6.2.4. Overall conclusion on market definition.................................................................... 36

  • 7.7.
  • Affected markets ........................................................................................................ 36

7.7.1. Horizontally affected markets.................................................................................... 36 7.7.2. Vertically affected markets ........................................................................................ 37

  • 8.
  • Competitive Assessment............................................................................................ 37

  • Legal test .................................................................................................................... 38
  • 8.1.

8.1.1. Horizontal non-coordinated effects............................................................................ 38 8.1.2. Horizontal coordinated effects ................................................................................... 39 8.1.3. Vertical effects ........................................................................................................... 39 8.1.4. Conglomerate non-coordinated effects ...................................................................... 40

  • 8.2.
  • GP HSMs ................................................................................................................... 41

8.2.1. Market shares and concentration levels ..................................................................... 41 8.2.1.1. Introduction................................................................................................................ 41 8.2.1.2. Market shares provided by the Notifying Party ......................................................... 42 8.2.1.3. Market shares for GP HSMs as provided by the Notifying Party.............................. 42 8.2.1.4. Submission on contestability of customers provided by the Notifying Party............ 44 8.2.1.5. Market reconstruction undertaken by the Commission ............................................. 46 8.2.1.6. The Commission's market reconstruction exercise.................................................... 47 8.2.1.7. Market shares for GP HSMs based on the Commission's market reconstruction...... 47 8.2.1.8. Conclusion on market shares and concentration levels.............................................. 49 8.2.2. Non-coordinated horizontal effects on the EEA-wide market for GP HSMs............ 49 8.2.2.1. Competitive conditions pre-Transaction.................................................................... 50 8.2.2.2. Competitive constraints exerted by the Parties .......................................................... 51

  • A.
  • Closeness of competition between Thales and Gemalto............................................ 51

Notifying Party’s views............................................................................................................ 51 Commission’s assessment........................................................................................................ 51

  • (i)
  • Both Thales and Gemalto are traditional vendors with a strong track record............ 52

Both Thales and Gemalto offer a wide range of neighbouring solutions .................. 52 Thales and Gemalto compete head-to-head ............................................................... 53 Thales and Gemalto are considered close competitors by third parties..................... 55
(ii) (iii) (iv) Conclusion on closeness of competition .................................................................................. 55 8.2.2.3. Specific assessment of the competitive constraint exerted by Thales........................ 55 A. B. C.
Notifying Party’s views.............................................................................................. 55 Commission’s assessment.......................................................................................... 55 Conclusion on competitive constraint exerted by Thales .......................................... 56

4
8.2.2.4. Specific assessment of the competitive constraint exerted by Gemalto .................... 56 A. B. C.
Notifying Party’s views.............................................................................................. 56 Commission’s assessment.......................................................................................... 56 Conclusion on competitive constraint exerted by Gemalto ....................................... 56
8.2.3. Competitive constraints from other GP HSM manufacturers.................................... 57 A. B. C.
Notifying Party’s views.............................................................................................. 57 Commission’s assessment.......................................................................................... 57 Conclusion.................................................................................................................. 59
8.2.4. Competitive constraint from CSPs............................................................................. 59 A. B. (i)
Notifying Party’s views.............................................................................................. 59 Commission’s assessment.......................................................................................... 59 Alleged competitive constraint currently exerted by CSPs on GP HSM manufacturers .................................................................................................................................... 59

  • (ii)
  • Alleged competitive constraint expected to be exerted by CSPs on GP HSM

manufacturers in the near future ................................................................................ 62

(iii) C.
Price discrimination .................................................................................................. 63 Conclusion.................................................................................................................. 63
8.2.5. Conclusion on non-coordinated horizontal effects on the EEA-wide and worldwide market for GP HSMs.................................................................................................. 64

8.2.6. Countervailing factors................................................................................................ 64 8.2.6.1. Entry........................................................................................................................... 64 A. B. C.
Notifying Party's views .............................................................................................. 64 Commission's assessment .......................................................................................... 65 Conclusion on entry ................................................................................................... 67
8.2.6.2. Buyer power............................................................................................................... 67 A. B. C.
Notifying Party's views .............................................................................................. 67 Commission's assessment .......................................................................................... 68 Conclusion on buyer power ....................................................................................... 69
8.2.6.3. Efficiencies................................................................................................................. 69 8.2.7. Coordinated horizontal effects on the EEA-wide market for GP HSMs ................... 70 8.2.7.1. Notifying Party’s views.............................................................................................. 70 8.2.7.2. Commission’s assessment.......................................................................................... 70

  • 8.3.
  • Payment HSMs........................................................................................................... 71

8.3.1. Market shares and concentration levels ..................................................................... 71 8.3.1.1. Market shares for Payment HSMs as provided by the Notifying Party..................... 71 8.3.1.2. Market shares for Payment HSMs based on the Commission's market reconstruction
.................................................................................................................................... 73

8.3.1.3. Conclusion on market shares and concentration levels.............................................. 75

5
8.3.2. Non-coordinated horizontal effects on the EEA-wide market for Payment HSMs... 75 8.3.2.1. Competitive conditions pre-Transaction.................................................................... 75 8.3.2.2. Competitive constraints exerted by the Parties .......................................................... 75

  • A.
  • Closeness of competition between Thales and Gemalto............................................ 75

Notifying Party’s views............................................................................................................ 75 Commission’s assessment........................................................................................................ 75

  • (i)
  • Gemalto is a small player in the market for Payment HSMs..................................... 75

  • The parties do not view each other as close competitors........................................... 76
  • (ii)

Thales' internal documents....................................................................................................... 76 (ii) Gemalto does not view its product as unique............................................................. 77 8.3.2.3. Competitive constraint from other Payment HSM manufacturers............................. 78 A. B.
Notifying Party’s views.............................................................................................. 78 Commission’s assessment.......................................................................................... 78
8.3.2.4. Conclusion on non-coordinated horizontal effects on the EEA-wide market for
Payment HSMs........................................................................................................... 79

Recommended publications
  • An Introduction to Network Slicing

    An Introduction to Network Slicing

    AN INTRODUCTION TO NETWORK SLICING An Introduction to Network Slicing Copyright © 2017 GSM Association AN INTRODUCTION TO NETWORK SLICING About the GSMA Future Networks Programme The GSMA represents the interests of mobile operators The GSMA’s Future Networks is designed to help operators worldwide, uniting nearly 800 operators with almost 300 and the wider mobile industry to deliver All-IP networks so companies in the broader mobile ecosystem, including handset that everyone benefits regardless of where their starting point and device makers, software companies, equipment providers might be on the journey. and internet companies, as well as organisations in adjacent industry sectors. The GSMA also produces industry-leading The programme has three key work-streams focused on: events such as Mobile World Congress, Mobile World Congress The development and deployment of IP services, The Shanghai, Mobile World Congress Americas and the Mobile 360 evolution of the 4G networks in widespread use today, Series of conferences. The 5G Journey developing the next generation of mobile technologies and service. For more information, please visit the GSMA corporate website at www.gsma.com. Follow the GSMA on Twitter: @GSMA. For more information, please visit the Future Networks website at: www.gsma.com/futurenetworks With thanks to contributors: AT&T Mobility BlackBerry Limited British Telecommunications PLC China Mobile Limited China Telecommunications Corporation China Unicom Cisco Systems, Inc Deutsche Telekom AG Emirates Telecommunications Corporation (ETISALAT) Ericsson Gemalto NV Hong Kong Telecommunications (HKT) Limited Huawei Technologies Co Ltd Hutchison 3G UK Limited Intel Corporation Jibe Mobile, Inc KDDI Corporation KT Corporation Kuwait Telecom Company (K.S.C.) Nokia NTT DOCOMO, Inc.
  • SAS Agent for Outlook Web App (OWA) FAQS

    SAS Agent for Outlook Web App (OWA) FAQS

    SAS Agent for Outlook Web App (OWA) FAQS Contents Description .................................................................................................................................................................................. 2 Frequently Asked Questions ....................................................................................................................................................... 2 Product Documentation .............................................................................................................................................................. 5 Support Contacts ........................................................................................................................................................................ 5 FAQs: SAS Agent for Outlook Web App (OWA) Page 1 of 5 Document PN: 007-013369-001, Rev. C, Copyright © 2015 Gemalto, Inc., All rights reserved. Description This document answers frequently asked questions about the new version 1.09 SafeNet Authentication Service (SAS) Agent for Outlook Web App (OWA). The SAS Agent for OWA is designed to help Microsoft enterprise customers ensure that their Outlook Web App email accounts can be accessed only by authorized users, whether working remotely or behind a firewall. It delivers a simplified and consistent user login experience and helps organizations comply with regulatory requirements. The use of two-factor authentication instead of traditional static passwords to access Outlook Web App is a necessary step for information
  • NXP Semiconductors

    NXP Semiconductors

    Connected Car Security Portable Internet of Things and Wearable NXP Semiconductors SECURE CONNECTIONS FOR A SMARTER WORLD NXP Semiconductors N.V. (NASDAQ: NXPI) creates solutions that enable secure connections for a smarter world. Building on its expertise in high-performance mixed signal electronics, NXP is driving innovation in the areas of connected car, security, portable & wearable, and the Internet of Things. NXP has operations in more than 25 countries, and posted revenue of $5.65 billion in 2014. Find out more at www.nxp.com. Key facts and figures Revenue: $ 5.65 billion (2014) Locations 3-year CAGR: Revenue 10%, EPS 38% Research and development activities in Asia, Europe and the United Established in 2006, IPO in 2010 States. Manufacturing facilities in Asia and Europe. 55+ years of experience in semiconductors Headquarters: Eindhoven, the Netherlands Wafer fabs: Test and assembly sites: Operations in +25 countries, approx. 28,000 employees Hamburg Bangkok Jilin Cabuyao Manchester Guangdong Kaoshiung Businesses Nijmegen Singapore Seremban High Performance Mixed Signal: Shanghai • Automotive Suzhou • Secure Identification Solutions • Secure Connected Devices • Secure Interfaces & Power Standard Products Joint Ventures and other major participations*: Customers & distribution partners (in alphabetical order): Systems on Silicon Manufacturing Company (SSMC) Pte. Ltd. (61%) Largest OEM customers: Apple, Bosch, Continental, Gemalto, Datang NXP Semiconductors Co., Ltd. (49%) Giesecke & Devrient, Huawei, Kona, Nokia Networks, Panasonic, Suzhou ASEN Semiconductors Co., Ltd. (40%) and Samsung. Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd. (27%) Largest distribution partners: Arrow, Avnet and WPG Cohda Wireless Pty Ltd. (23%) * approximate and >10 % Research & Development Target Annual R&D investment 13 – 14% of revenue Approx.
  • Technology, Media, and Telecommunications Quarterly Update

    Technology, Media, and Telecommunications Quarterly Update

    Technology, Media, and Telecommunications Quarterly Update Q4 2017 Deloitte Corporate Finance LLC | www.investmentbanking.deloitte.com Quarterly Update | Q4 2017 | TMT TMT Trends In This Update Digital/Augmented Reality1 Financial Technologies (“Fintech”)2 • TMT Trends Over the next decade, Blockchain technologies are • Economic Outlook advances in digital reality on a path toward broad • Industry Analysis will likely lead to new and adoption, with proofs of • Select M&A Transactions innovative ways in which concept shifting toward these technologies can production and many leading • Appendix improve our lives. organizations exploring use International Data Corp. cases. Gartner Inc. projects projects that total spending that blockchain’s business This update will focus on news on AR/VR products and value-add will grow to $176B and trends in the following services will soar from $9.1B by 2025. areas: in 2017 to nearly $160B in 2021, representing a 113.2% CAGR. • Software • Internet Automotive Technology3 Machine Learning4 • IT Services The increasing global adoption Machine Learning is of smartphone technologies is increasingly being incorporated • Hardware forcing the automotive industry into mobile devices and smart • Media & Telecommunications to rethink how cars are made, sensors, expanding the • Automotive Technology bought, and driven. Software technology’s applications to competence is increasingly smart homes and cities, becoming one of the most autonomous vehicles, wearable Who We Are important differentiating factors technology, and the industrial for the industry. Driven by Internet of Things. Large and shared mobility, connectivity medium-sized enterprises are Deloitte Corporate Finance LLC services, and feature upgrades, intensifying their use of is a leading global middle new business models could machine learning, with the expand automotive revenue number of implementations market M&A adviser.
  • Gemalto Intelligent OEM Document Reader At10ki

    Gemalto Intelligent OEM Document Reader At10ki

    TECHNICAL DATA SHEET Gemalto Intelligent OEM Document Reader AT10Ki Product Use With built-in high-performance processing and networking the Gemalto Intelligent OEM Document Reader AT10Ki is designed for cloud and virtual computing environments. The AT10Ki OEM inspects and images travel documents, including electronic travel documents and 1D and 2D barcodes used by the airline industry on boarding passes and cell phones. The reader’s low profile and simple shape make it ideal for integration with self-service kiosks, counters and eGates at airports and other locations such as railway and cruise terminals. The Intelligent “i” series readers include an embedded Arm® processor running Linux® meaning that for networked mode all the document processing is carried out on the reader. Ready for the cloud the Gemalto AT10Ki OEM uses web style encrypted JSON messaging to simplify application development, deployment and maintenance. For the customer this means: > The AT10Ki OEM can connect to any mobile device, phone or tablet (you can create reader farms) > The reader can be used in pool mode connecting to multiple devices > A single computer can connect to multiple readers > Flexible install options > Lower development and life time IT costs > Direct connection with Software as a Service (SaaS) and enterprise back-end applications Designed for use in demanding airport self-service scenarios, it also s erves banking, hospitality, government and any other industries where you need accurate and reliable document and ID v erification and reading. The design of the Gemalto AT10Ki OEM is based on detailed and exhaustive an alysis of field experience and numerous deployed projects.
  • Iot Platform Contracts Tracker: Actility Is Winning a High Share of Telco Deals June 2017 Ahmed Ali

    Iot Platform Contracts Tracker: Actility Is Winning a High Share of Telco Deals June 2017 Ahmed Ali

    IoT platform contracts tracker: Actility is winning a high share of telco deals June 2017 Ahmed Ali Operators and vendors are keeping a close watch on contracts for IoT solutions. Analysys Mason has gathered the details of 280 deals in our recently published IoT platform contracts tracker.1 The key trends we have identified in this data are as follows. • Vendors have an opportunity to do deals with large operators, but solutions need to be targeted (for example, towards specific vertical markets) or differentiated from those of established vendors. Big advanced operators, such as AT&T and Vodafone, have already signed deals for solutions across the value chain. • Smaller operators (such as Telecom Italia and TELUS) have suppliers for connectivity management but will need support if they are to compete in other aspects of the value chain (for example, data management and application enablement). • The market is relatively mature – a few vendors are dominating each section of the market. For example, Cisco Jasper, Ericsson and Vodafone have won around two-thirds of the publicly announced contracts for connectivity management. Cumulocity and PTC/ThingWorx have won around half the contracts for application enablement. • Established telecoms vendors are offering solutions that are close to connectivity, but new vendors have opportunities in this area – for example, Actility has taken a strong position in the low-power, wide-area (LPWA) network space. Our analysis reveals that AT&T, Deutsche Telekom, SoftBank and Vodafone are well advanced with their IoT solutions The IoT software stack has components that can be grouped into three basic layers: • connectivity management • device and data management • application enablement.
  • Gemalto Double-Sided ID Card Reader CR5400

    Gemalto Double-Sided ID Card Reader CR5400

    TECHNICAL DATA SHEET Gemalto Double-sided ID Card Reader CR5400 Product Use The Gemalto Double-sided ID Card Reader CR5400 inspects and images government issued identity documents ID1 sized (85 x 54mm) in a variety of market segments like Retail, Financial and Hospitality. Optional functions include: > Docking cradle supporting non-optical reading requirements > Support for biometrically enabled travel documents containing contactless integrated circuit chips (eIDs) > ISO 7810 and ISO 7811 3-Track magnetic stripe reader Comprehensive Software Features KEY STANDARD FEATURES & FUNCTIONALITY > Flexible software interface allows host application to select which illumination sources to use, image type, > Double-sided document imaging for ID1 size image compression, image resolution, photo extraction, documents in 24-bit color reflection or ambient light elimination, colour > Configurable image resolution up to 630 DPI enhancement, which date groups to read, etc. > Enables images to be accessed as BMP, PNG or JPEG format > Multiple wavelength illumination – visible, near > Simple high level API for quick program development or infrared, and UV detailed low level API for fine control of all reader functions > Anti-Glare technology eliminates image artifacts > Contactless IC reading for ePassports (LDS 1.7) including due to laminate or OVDs Active and Passive authentication, Basic Access Control, Extended Access Control (PKI 1.11) and Supplemental Access > Automatic card detection and processing Control. The SDK provides writing capability using
  • Cellular M2M Communication Cinterion Simply and Securely Connects Intelligent Systems Anywhere Holger Lenz / Director Business Development

    Cellular M2M Communication Cinterion Simply and Securely Connects Intelligent Systems Anywhere Holger Lenz / Director Business Development

    Cellular M2M Communication Cinterion simply and securely connects Intelligent Systems anywhere Holger Lenz / Director Business Development © CINTERION Wireless Modules GmbH 2012, All rights reserved Cinterion – the leading M2M module supplier Cinterion – who we are M2M Module Market Shares 2011 Other Sagem CINTERION . Worldwide leading supplier of industrial cellular 27% machine-to-machine (M2M) communication Novatel modules - GSM, GPRS, EDGE, UMTS, HSPA+ SIMcom . Founded as a business unit of Siemens Communication in 1995 and spun off in 2008 . A Gemalto company since 2010 Telit ® Sierra . Intel Intelligent System Alliance Associate (2012) Wireless 1997 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 1st automotive 1st GPRS 1st GSM/GPS 1st HSDPA Scalability Scalable grade module module on the module on the module on the GPRS + EDGE UMTS & HSPA+ market market market platform module 2000 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 1st Compact 1st Java 1st EDGE HSDPA Evolution Automotive GSM module module on with Products HSPA+ module the market worldwide LGA surface module roaming mounting 2000 2005 2010 Page 2 Holger Lenz Cellular M2M Communication Intel M2M Day - Munich CINTERION Cinterion – global reach and local support Headquarters Americas . Munich (GER) Europe . USA . Present in Technology Center . Canada 11 countries . Berlin (GER) . Brazil Asia . China . Taiwan . Japan . Korea . India Headquarters . Singapore . Australia Sales Office Manufacturing MEA Technology Center . Leipzig (GER) . South Africa Factory . Curitiba (BRA) . Israel Further local Gemalto offices . Shanghai
  • SPECIFICATION LICENSE and NON-ASSERTION AGREEMENT (The Agreement), Between

    SPECIFICATION LICENSE and NON-ASSERTION AGREEMENT (The Agreement), Between

    TM MIFARE4Mobile SPECIFICATION LICENSE AND NON-ASSERTION AGREEMENT (the Agreement), between 1. Giesecke & Devrient GmbH with its principal place of business at Prinzregentenstraße 159, D- 81677 Munich, Germany (hereinafter referred to as “G&D”); and Gemalto SA, with its principal place of business at 6 Rue de la Verrerie, 92190 Meudon, France (hereinafter referred to as “Gemalto”); and NXP Semiconductors Netherlands B.V., a private limited liability company incorporated under the laws of the Netherlands with its registered offices at High Tech Campus 60, 5656 AG Eindhoven, the Netherlands also acting on behalf of NXP B.V. (hereinafter referred to as “NXP”); and Oberthur Technologies SA, with its registered head office at 50 Quai Michelet, 92300 Levallois- Perret, France, (hereinafter referred to as “Oberthur”); and STMicroelectronics International NV, a company incorporated and exiting under the laws of The Netherlands, acting through its Swiss branch, with a registered office at 39, chemin du Champ- des-Filles, 1228 Genève / Plan-les Ouates, Switzerland (hereinafter referred to as “ST”); With G&D, Gemalto, NXP, Oberthur and ST each referred to as a “Licensor” and collectively the “Licensors”; and 2. the Licensee as named in the specification request form filled in on the MIFARE4Mobile website of Licensors www.mifare4mobile.org on behalf of himself/herself and the organization he/she is representing. The Licensors and the Licensee are in this Agreement collectively referred to as the Parties and individually also as a Party. IT IS AGREED as follows: 1. The Licensors do not give any representations or warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of Information contained in the MIFARE4Mobile Specification and/or provided by the Licensors under this license and shall have no liability for the consequences of use of such Information.
  • NXP Semiconductors N.V. (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)

    NXP Semiconductors N.V. (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)

    As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 9, 2011 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 20-F ¨ REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 OR x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 OR ¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 OR ¨ SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Date of event requiring this shell company report For the transition period from to Commission file number 001-34841 NXP Semiconductors N.V. (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter) The Netherlands (Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) High Tech Campus 60, Eindhoven 5656 AG, the Netherlands (Address of principal executive offices) Jean Schreurs, SVP and Senior Corporate Counsel, High Tech Campus 60, 5656 AG, Eindhoven, the Netherlands Telephone: +31 40 2728686 / E-mail: [email protected] (Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person) Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act. Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered Common shares—par value euro (EUR) 0.20 per share The NASDAQ Global Select Market Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act. None Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act.
  • Gemalto Authentication and Hardware Security Module

    Gemalto Authentication and Hardware Security Module

    Securing F5 solutions: Gemalto Authentication and Hardware Security Module Marko Bobinac, PreSales Manager, Enterprise and Cybersecurity Bucharest, 20.3.2019 ENCRYPTION=DIGITAL CEMENT Why is Encryption Secure? Example: AES128 = 3,4 x 1038 Keys Assuming a Super Computer can calculate ~ 1 Billion Keys / second, we have 100 Super Computers, we find the key in the 1%. Finding the Key takes 1022 years. Universe is 1011 years old. Cryptography as an IT Service ProtectFile Server/Desktop Agent Hardware Security Modules Appliance Certificate Infrastructures AMI Metering Network Share Encryption Proxy Nat. IDs E-Signatures Tape BacKups Protect File Shares Protect E-Passports File Shares Infrastructure Authentication Management Protect V Manager (On-Premise or Virtual Appliance Cloud) Virtual Instances L2 HighSpeed Virtual Storage Encryptors Key Secure Appliance Protect Identities Protect Cloud & **##** Virtual Infrastructure Ethernet ToKenization FiberChanel Applications (.NET, JAVA, 3rd party solutions Protect Protect KMIP, XML) (e.g. Self-encrypting drives via KMIP) Data Centers Databases Data Transfer 4 Gemalto Enterprise & Cybersecurity CONFIDENTIAL File encryption 26/03/2019 400+ Authentication Integrations 400+ HSM Integrations 35+ Crypto Integrations 30+ KeySecure Integrations 5 Gemalto Enterprise & Cybersecurity CONFIDENTIAL 26/03/2019 400+ +300Authentication IntegrationsHSM Integrations 400+ HSM Integrations 35+ Crypto Integrations 30+ KeySecure Integrations 6 Gemalto Enterprise & Cybersecurity CONFIDENTIAL 26/03/2019 400+ +300Authentication
  • Huawei En Gemalto Werken Samen Om De Inzet Van Narrowband-Iot Te Versnellen

    Huawei En Gemalto Werken Samen Om De Inzet Van Narrowband-Iot Te Versnellen

    Huawei en Gemalto werken samen om de inzet van NarrowBand-IoT te versnellen Gemalto en Huawei creëren een rendabele oplossing voor het IoT voor de massamarkt Amsterdam, 14 november 2017 – Om producenten van apparatuur te helpen bij het voldoen aan de groeiende vraag naar duurzame en energiezuinige NarrowBand (NB) IoT-modules werken Gemalto en Huawei – via diens tak voor halfgeleiders, HiSilicon – samen aan de ontwikkeling van de volgende generatie modules, die een extra beveiligingsniveau bieden en zeer weinig stroom verbruiken. Door de expertise van beide ondernemingen te combineren kunnen deze NB-IoT-modules bijdragen aan een reductie van zowel de kosten als de grootte van de apparatuur door de producenten en aan de verlenging van de levensduur van de batterijen tot wel tien jaar. NB IoT werd ontwikkeld om met lagere bitsnelheden en lagere kostensegmenten te werken en werkt vrijwel overal. Door haar uiterst lage stroomverbruik kan apparatuur tot 10 jaar lang op batterijen werken. Toepassingen zijn onder meer intelligente parkeersensoren, inbraak- en brandalarmen, persoonlijke gezondheidsapparaten, volgapparatuur en straatlantaarns. Volgens ABI Research zullen NB IoT-modules voor de verbinding van objecten met netwerken tegen 2021 meer dan 20% van al het gsm-verkeer vertegenwoordigen. ‘2017 is voor ons het jaar van de commerciële NB IoT-introducties, en we zullen tegen het eind van het jaar 30 van dergelijke netwerken bouwen in 20 landen over de hele wereld. Huawei is een belangrijke speler op dit gebied en we blijven profiteren van deze enorme kansen die deze sector biedt,’ aldus XiongWei, president LTE- oplossingen van Huawei. ‘We streven ernaar de markt te voorzien van oplossingen die een stabiele connectiviteit, laag energieverbruik en kostenefficiëntie bieden.