THE PERFECT TYPHOON: VIEWING TAIWAN'S TYPHOON MORAKOT THROUGH JOURNALISTIC LENSES
A Dissertation Submitted to the Temple University Graduate Board
In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY
by Chiaoning Su July 2015
Examining Committee Members:
Dr. Carolyn Kitch, Advisory Chair, Journalism Dr. Nancy Morris, Media Studies and Production Dr. Deborah Cai, Strategic Communication Dr. Katherine Fry, External Reader, Brooklyn College, CUNY
© Copyright 2015
by
Chiaoning Su All Rights Reserved
ii ABSTRACT
Although scientific and technological progress continues to improve advanced warning technologies for meteorological and seismic events, natural disasters remain a threat globally. Asia is the continent most affected by natural disasters. Located in both the Circum-Pacific seismic belt and the western Pacific typhoon zone, Taiwan faces similar threats to its Asian neighbors. In 2009, the island nation experienced Typhoon
Morakot and saw its massive rain-triggered landslides, burying more than 700 people in several rural villages and causing US$1.5 billion in economic losses. Furthermore,
Typhoon Morakot was a political storm and a symbolic crisis because of the government's sluggish and inept response and the identity of the primary victims—
Taiwanese Aborigines—who were forced to negotiate their racial identity and cultural heritage post-disaster.
This dissertation examines the cultural and political role of disaster journalism.
Employing a methodological triangulation of in-depth interviews with 23 veteran journalists who covered Typhoon Morakot and textual analysis of broadcast, newspaper, and online news coverage of Typhoon Morakot, this project investigates the process of disaster news-making, the visual construction of public emotions in broadcast news, the narrative attribution of political responsibility in newspapers, and the social justice potential of alternative media. News coverage of Typhoon Morakot thus provides both an outlet to witness the production and presentation of disaster news developed in a highly mature and competitive media environment and a glimpse into the international challenges and domestic predicaments faced by the newly democratized Taiwan.
iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Sitting down to write these acknowledgements feels surreal because there was a point at which I did not think this dissertation would ever be finished. The fact that I can now close this chapter in my life is due in great part to my advisory committee. I would like to thank my advisor, Dr. Carolyn Kitch, for her unwavering support, guidance, and patience. Her wisdom shone through this typhoon to provide direction when I felt so battered and lost. I am grateful to Dr. Nancy Morris for believing in me from the very start, even when I couldn't believe in myself. Her passion for Chinese culture and language made me feel welcomed. Dr. Deborah Cai has always served as a great example of a strong female scholar juggling both academic and administrative duties. Finally, thank you to Dr. Katherine Fry for providing valuable comments and questions during the dissertation defense.
I was fortunate to have the opportunity to work for Dr. Neil Theobald, his wife professor Sheona Mackenzie, and Dr. Hai-Lung Dai. The experiences they provided allowed me to see how the university operates and how Temple Owls are made.
My lovely cohort who shared the laughter and tears along the way will remain lifelong friends. Thank you, Angela Carter, Alina Hogea, Byron Lee, and Michael
Schuyler. Several M&C alumni provided the necessary know-how and friendship when I needed it the most. Thank you, Sueen Noh Kelsey, Jiwon Yoon, Lingling Pan, and
Satarupa Dasgupta. I am also grateful for the support offered by Jade Kim, Hojeong Lee,
Jaehyeon Jeong, and Weidan Cao. Finally, Paige Gibson appeared in the last mile of this journey but became my greatest motivator, proofreader, and sounding board in finishing this dissertation.
iv I would like to thank my longtime friends Tzu-En Chang, Pin-Hsien Wu, and
Yen-Yu Chen for encouraging me to pursue my American dream. Their encouragement gave me strength to continue on this path. Thanks to my Taiwanese friends in
Philadelphia, Kai-Hao Wang, Han-Chih Wang, Jen-Kuan Chang, Florence S.C. Hsu, and
Sophie Ling-Chia Wei for being my family away from home.
I would be nothing without my family. Growing up, my father always told me that words and dreams matter. Everything I do, I do in the hopes of one day being more like him. My mother taught me that strength can come in gentle packages. I am forever grateful for the dedication she has shown our family. My older sister has long been a role model in my life. Because she shouldered the responsibility of continuing our family legacy, I have had the freedom to pursue my own path. My brother-in-law and my two nieces have brought great joy into our family. My younger sister is my best friend in the whole world. She has her own way to cheer me up and keep me moving forward. She is my true soul mate. This dissertation is for them.
v TABLE OF CONTENTS
ABSTRACT ...... iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ...... iv
LIST OF FIGURES ...... x
LIST OF TABLES ...... xi
PROLOGUE ...... xii
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ...... 1
Taiwan, the Republic of "Crisis" ...... 5
A Brief History of Taiwan ...... 9
The Transformation of the Taiwanese Media Landscape ...... 11
Aborigines, Outsiders in Taiwan’s Imagined Community ...... 17
Overview of Dissertation Chapters ...... 23
CHAPTER 2: OVERVIEW OF THEORY AND METHODS ...... 27
Conceptualizing Modern Disasters ...... 27
Disasters and the News Media ...... 36
Studying Journalism Through the Concept of Ritual ...... 38
Studying Disaster Journalism Through the Concept of Social Drama ...... 42
Methods and Data Explained ...... 45
CHAPTER 3: MAKING DISASTER NEWS: JOURNALISTS' REPORTING ASSIGNMENTS DURING TYPHOON MORAKOT ...... 48
Literature Review ...... 49
Theoretical Construct ...... 50
Journalism in Times of Disaster ...... 53
vi Method ...... 54
Racing the Typhoon with the Boys ...... 57
The (False) Acceleration of Onsite Operational Autonomy ...... 58
The Socialization of Disaster News Language ...... 63
The Gender Boundary in Disaster Reporting...... 68
Conclusion ...... 73
CHAPTER 4: FEELING THE DISASTER: AN EXAMINATION OF EMOTIVE TELEVISION REPORTAGE FOLLOWING TYPHOON MORAKOT ...... 75
The Expression of Emotion in Disaster News...... 76
The Integrative Function of Emotive Disaster News ...... 76
The Disruptive Function of Emotive Disaster News ...... 79
Method ...... 81
Findings ...... 83
Switching to "Disaster Marathon" Mode ...... 83
Live Broadcasting the Horror ...... 86
Dramatizing "Floods of Tears" ...... 91
Manufactured Compassion and Hope ...... 97
Conclusion ...... 100
CHAPTER 5: WHEN A NATURAL DISASTER TURNS INTO A POLITICAL STORM: HOW NEWSPAPERS FRAME POLITICAL RESPONSIBILITIES DURING AND AFTERMATH TYPHOON MORAKOT ...... 102
Literature Review ...... 103
Method ...... 107
From Natural Disaster to Political Storm ...... 110
Setting the Stage: Employing Historical Analogies to Define the Situation ...... 112
vii Identifying the Culprit: Quoting Foreign News Sources to Play the Blame Game 117
Searching for Closure: Using Media Events to Restore Public Consensus ...... 123
Conclusion ...... 127
CHAPTER 6: AN ALTERNATIVE "CHRONICLE OF CHAOS": A CASE STUDY OF 88NEWS' CONSTRUCTION OF ABORIGINAL VICTIMS DURING AND AFTER TYPHOON MORAKOT...... 130
Alternative Media and Active Citizenship ...... 131
Distinguishing Alternative Media from Mainstream Media ...... 132
Alternative Media in Taiwan ...... 135
Method: A Case Study of 88news ...... 137
Manufacturing an Alternative Voice: News Production by 88news ...... 139
Objective, Ownership, and Financing ...... 140
Production and Distribution ...... 142
Traditional Journalistic Values ...... 143
New Norms of Transparency ...... 145
A Disaster Story Untold: Regarding the Pain of the Minority ...... 147
Controlling Race Through Law and Charity ...... 148
Converting Race Through Physical Environment ...... 153
Colonizing Race Through the Regulation of Daily Conduct ...... 156
Employing Refugee Discourse as a Means of Claiming Race and Citizenship ..... 159
Conclusion ...... 162
CHAPTER 7: CONCLUSION...... 164
The Temporal Unfolding of Typhoon Morakot and the Healing Role of Disaster
Reporting ...... 164
viii Two Epistemological Questions to Journalism ...... 169
Viewing Typhoon Morakot Through the Universal as well as the Particular .... 176
APPENDIX A: INTERVIEW PROTOCOL (MAINSTREAM MEDIA) ...... 182
APPENDIX B: INTERVIEW PROTOCOL (ALTERNATIVE MEDIA) ...... 183
APPENDIX C: INTERVIEWEE INFORMATION ...... 184
APPENDIX D: FIGURES ...... 186
APPENDIX E: CINEMATIC VIGNETTE POEM ...... 196
REFERENCES ...... 197
ix LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE 4.1 – “MORAKOT SWEEPS THROUGH” ...... 186
FIGURE 4.2 – PXMART TYPHOON AD ...... 186
FIGURE 4.3 – 7-ELEVEN “RAINBOW WITHIN THE TYPHOON” ...... 187
FIGURE 4.4 – PROVIDING CONTEXT ...... 187
FIGURE 4.5 – INTENSE PERSONAL GRIEF ...... 188
FIGURE 4.6 – BIRD’S EYE CRITIQUE ...... 188
FIGURE 4.7 – EYE-LEVEL FLOOD ...... 189
FIGURE 4.8 – CINEMATIC VIGNETTE ...... 189
FIGURE 5.1 – “VERY STRONG WINDS” ...... 190
FIGURE 5.2 – FLOATING BODY ...... 190
FIGURE 5.3 – “FUCK THE GOVERNMENT!” ...... 191
FIGURE 5.4 – CNN QUICKVOTE SOURCING...... 191
FIGURE 5.5 – PRESIDENT MA’S DEEP BOW ...... 192
FIGURE 5.6 – “FIND OUT WHO’S RESPONSIBLE!” ...... 192
FIGURE 5.7 – PRESIDENT MA CONSOLING TYPHOON VICTIM ...... 193
FIGURE 5.8 – EMPHASIZING THE VICTIMS ...... 193
FIGURE 5.9 – “STOP IGNORING VICTIMS” ...... 194
FIGURE 6.1 – GREAT LOVE VILLAGE STONE INSCRIPTION ...... 195
FIGURE 6.2 – PROTESTERS SMOKE SIGNAL ...... 195
x LIST OF TABLES
TABLE 1 – DAILY NEWSPAPER CIRCULATION ...... 15
xi PROLOGUE
Summer 2009 started off like any other in Taiwan. The days were long and the heat oppressive. President Ma Ying-Jeou, who had just been elected a year earlier, was at the top of his political career. His victory brought Kuomintang (KMT) back into power after eight years. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), the opposition, had lost its momentum and was struggling to maintain its constituency. No one could have anticipated the typhoon that would come to change the physical and political landscape.
The Central Weather Bureau announced the formation of Typhoon Morakot on
August 7, 2009. At first no one took it seriously, including public officials responsible for disaster management. This island nation is usually pummeled by at least three or four typhoons a year. Dealing with torrential summer rain is a natural part of life in Taiwan.
People paid even less attention to Typhoon Morakot as August 8 is Father's Day—a day for families to reunite. As reported by Taipei Times, Executive Yuan Secretary-General
Hsueh Hsiang-Chuan excused the government's slow response by saying: "Come on, it's
Father's Day!" (Shih & Hsu, 2009). But the massive rain this typhoon brought and the landslides it triggered quickly turned Morakot into much more than just another weather event.
In merely three days, the typhoon killed more than 700 people, caused more than
$1.5 billion in economic losses (Huang, 2009). Most victims were aboriginal people, an ethnic minority long marginalized in Taiwan. For a month, the nation viewed images of ravaged terrain, of ruined infrastructure, and of death. Stories of misery and loss were disseminated across a variety of media outlets. Most apparent, however, were the social
xii problems underlying this natural disaster. The media spectacle it created transformed
Morakot into a news war, the politicians who pointed figures at each other created a political storm, and the tension between the Han Chinese-dominated government and the aboriginal communities created a symbolic crisis in the aftermath.
This dissertation attempts to understand the complexity surrounding Typhoon
Morakot through its news production and presentation. In the center of the mediated typhoon lie the tension and struggle facing the contemporary Taiwanese people.
xiii CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
Although scientific and technological progress continues to improve advanced warning technologies for meteorological and seismic events, natural disasters remain a threat globally. In 2011 alone, the year this project began, the world saw a 6.3 magnitude earthquake in New Zealand (February 22, 2011); a devastating 8.9 magnitude earthquake, tsunami, and nuclear disaster in Japan (March 11, 2011); two massive weather disasters in the United States involving storms and tornadoes (April and May 2011); major floods in southern Thailand lasting for months (August to December 2011); a 7.1 magnitude earthquake in Turkey (October 23, 2011); and a severe storm that lashed the Philippines with torrential rains, floods, and landslides (December 2011). The Center for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED) recorded 332 natural triggered disasters in 2011, claiming 30,773 lives, affecting 244.7 million people, and inflicting a record US$366.1 billion in economic damage (Guha-Sapir, Below & Ponserre, 2012). Although 2011 was an extreme year in terms of disasters, it was not an anomaly. Rather it simply reflected the trend of recent decades toward increasingly frequent natural disasters.
From 1974 to 2003, approximately 6,367 natural disasters occurred worldwide, claiming more than two million lives, affecting 5.1 billion people (including leaving 182 million homeless), and causing about US$1.38 trillion in economic losses (Guha-Sapir,
Hargitt & Hoyois, 2004, p. 14). Furthermore, Oxfam's Climate Alarm Paper (2007) noted that the number of natural disasters occurring annually around the world has quadrupled during the past two decades, while the number affected by disasters "has increased from an average of 174 to 254 million people a year" (p. 7). As Oxfam director Barbara
Stocking observed, the future trend in natural disasters will be "a pattern of more frequent,
1 more erratic, more unpredictable and more extreme weather events [...] affecting more people" (Gutierrez, 2008, ¶ 4). The increasing frequency of destructive natural events not only causes enormous physical and psychological harm for affected populations but also represents an urgent problem demanding attention from interdisciplinary scholars.
In an age when competing news channels’ coverage of natural disasters has been labeled "disaster marathons" (Liebes, 1998, p. 71), the role of news media during natural disasters is particularly important. Most people only experience the shock and suffering associated with disaster indirectly via journalistic representations. News media not only transmit disaster images and information but also influence how these tragedies come to be known, responded to, and remembered. Accordingly, it is essential to ask how natural disasters are constructed in today's complex news media environment; how their significance and meaning are articulated by news media using cultural archetypal narratives; how conventional journalistic practice is challenged in times of disasters; how audiences are invited to witness, comprehend, and remember disasters through news media; and how society as a whole defines itself through disaster experiences and memories. To downplay the role of news media in constructing and interpreting disasters is to ignore a vital analytical perspective.
A burgeoning literature has explored the role of news media in the public construction of natural disasters. Some work focuses on the issue of news representation.
For instance, Fry (2003) detailed the way television news used specific cultural and aesthetic codes to represent the 1993 Midwest flood so as to reinforce the discourse and iconography long associated with the affected area. Other studies looked at the dimension of news production, including the multiple roles reporters play while covering natural
2 disasters (Durham, 2008; Izard & Perkins, 2012) and the coping mechanisms they employ to deal with the chaos and suffering they witness (Santos, 2010). Despite rich findings from these projects, very little research has focused on the Asian context and almost none on Taiwan. Scholarship about disaster journalism remains a Western-centric field despite Asia being the continent most severely affected by natural disasters. This is not to say that scholarly works on mediated disasters have never addressed Asian examples, but the few Asia-focused disaster studies to have been carried out adopted a
Western lens (Kivikuru & Nord, 2009). That is, most of these studies focused on events that significantly affected Westerners (e.g., the 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami) (West, 2008) or on cases that served the geopolitical aims of Western nations (Pantti, Wahl-Jorgensen,
& Cottle, 2012). Thus Asian political complexities and cultural nuances that significantly influence the production and presentation of disaster journalism have been either ignored or misinterpreted.
To address this shortage, this dissertation focuses on media coverage of Typhoon
Morakot, a traumatic weather event that struck Taiwan in 2009. This dissertation thus examines the cultural and political role of disaster journalism in an Asian context.
Specifically, this project investigates the following questions:
RQ1: How are conventional journalistic practices challenged in times of disaster?
How do journalists establish their cultural authority through disaster reportage? How do journalists remain objective in emotionally-charged situations?
RQ2: How do different media represent natural disasters? How are the issues of the construction of public emotion, the attribution of political responsibility, and the
3 representation of victims dealt with differently by newspapers, television, and alternative media?
In order to answer these research questions, this project relied on methodological triangulation focusing on the production and content of Typhoon Morakot news coverage.
These included 23 in-depth interviews with journalists who covered Typhoon Morakot, as well as interpretive visual analysis of 300 hours of the first week of broadcast news from the top three news networks (TVBS, SET, CTI), framing analysis of more than
8,000 articles of the first month of newspaper coverage for the four newspapers with the largest circulation (Liberty Times, Apple Daily, The China Times, and United Daily), and narrative analysis of 1,396 article of the four years of coverage produced by the alternative media site, 88news.
This dissertation conceptualizes modern natural disasters as a clash between natural forces and social actors and strives to derive instructive lessons from these destructive events. The analysis shows how journalism can transform natural disasters into constructed media events (or even pseudo events), reducing them to spectacles, framing them with cultural narratives, and helping preserve them in the collective social memory. Disaster journalism also reflects conflictual rituals through which imbalanced power relationships among authorities, journalists, and citizens are renegotiated and in which social reflexivity and critique are invited. Stories of natural disasters and associated grief and survival constantly appear in political language, news discourse, public debate, and popular culture. These stories are employed by politicians as effective rhetorical tropes to boost social solidarity and national identity, while simultaneously
4 being subversive symbols employed by media and social activists to challenge the legitimacy and competency of political authorities.
Taiwan, the Republic of "Crisis"
Given the natural fault line that runs along the Asian shore, Asia is the continent most often affected by natural disasters (47% of all such events occur in Asia), and suffers such calamities twice as often as the next two most affected continents, which are the Americas (where 22.4% of natural disasters occur) (Guha-Sapir, Hoyois & Below,
2014). Located in both the Circum-Pacific seismic belt and the western Pacific typhoon zone, Taiwan faces similar threats to its Asian neighbors. According to Taiwan’s Central
Weather Bureau (2008), the island country experiences 214 felt earthquakes and three to four typhoons each year. Given the frequency with which the nation is hit by natural disasters, it is not an exaggeration to call Taiwan the Republic of Crisis—a play on
Taiwan's official name the Republic of China. Dealing with torrential summer rains and being shaken awake by earthquakes is a part of life in Taiwan. Most Taiwanese can estimate the magnitude of a quake by how much a ceiling light swings. They have also come to learn that flashlights and candles are essentials during typhoon season, because heavy rains can cause power outages, and that the prices of certain vegetables that are vulnerable to water damage can skyrocket at this time of year.
The decade from 1999 to 2009 was particularly catastrophic for Taiwan, with the occurrence of two of the most devastating natural disasters in its post-WWII history, the
921 Earthquake and Typhoon Morakot. On 21 September 1999, Taiwan suffered a massive earthquake that left lasting physical and mental scars. In a matter of seconds, the devastating tremor, which measured 7.3 on the Richter scale, released energy equivalent
5 to over 40 atomic bombs, causing incalculable destruction (Lee, 1999). Many reported strange screeching sounds that seemed to warn of the ensuing catastrophe. People were shaken awake and some thought Taiwan was being bombed by China (Chang, 2002). In a letter to a friend, well-known Taiwanese writer Chang Man-Chuan described her experience of the horrific event:
The shuddering building I was in made shrieking sounds as if it were ready to collapse at any moment. I was terrified and thought I was about to die. That feeling that the world was ending has become part of me and will remain with me all my life. (Chang, 2009)
Realizing the seriousness of the situation, the government responded swiftly. Then-
President Lee Teng-Hui promptly declared a state of emergency and initiated rescue and relief efforts. Over the next fortnight, more than 460,000 soldiers worked to rescue survivors, locate the missing, and rebuild destroyed bridges and roads. More than
200,000 volunteers from both local and overseas nongovernmental organizations collected huge volumes of relief supplies and delivered them to victims in stricken areas
(Huang, 2009). Political leaders, including three presidential candidates who had been engaged in intense wrangling ahead of the 2000 presidential election agreed to suspend all political campaigning and called for the nation to come together in solidarity to face the challenges ahead (Yang, 1999). The official government death toll for the 921
Earthquake and its aftershocks stands at 2,455. A further 50 persons were ultimately declared missing, presumed dead, and 11,305 more were injured. Additionally, 38,935 buildings fully collapsed and another 45,320 partially collapsed. Total economic losses from the earthquake have been estimated at US$10.9 billion (Huang, 2009, p. 187).
Taiwanese news media coined the term Quake of the Century to describe this painful and
6 unforgettable calamity, which disrupted lives, tore families apart, deprived people of their friends and relatives, and traumatized society.
Ten years later, with the physical reconstruction largely recomplete and
Taiwanese society gradually recovering from the trauma of the 921 Earthquake, Taiwan suffered another natural disaster when Typhoon Morakot pummeled the island on 8
August 2009. According to official records, parts of Taiwan experienced a record- breaking 3000mm of rain over a three-day period. This massive rain event triggered major landslides, burying more than 677 people in several rural villages in southern
Taiwan and causing at least US$1.5 billion in economic losses (Huang, 2009, p. 131).
The devastation attracted international attention and the Dalai Lama visited Taiwan to pray for the typhoon victims (Lin, 2009). However, Typhoon Morakot quickly stirred up a political maelstrom locally owing to the government's sluggish and inept response.
Surveys indicated that only 10 percent of Taiwanese citizens were satisfied with the performance of President Ma Ying-Jeou in heading relief efforts, while 65 percent were strongly dissatisfied (TVBS Poll Center, 2009). One month after the tragedy, on
September 7, Premier Liu Chao-shiuan resigned to take full political responsibility for the administration’s failed management of the crisis (Pong, 2009).
A mutually constitutive relationship existed between these two natural disasters that happened ten years apart. The 921 Earthquake became a historical analogy that the news media used to define the status of Typhoon Morakot as it unfolded and that politicians used to judge the performance of rescue missions. Lessons government officials learned from the 921 Earthquake further dictated their decisions regarding post- disaster construction. Nevertheless, both the timing of the event and the identity of the
7 primary victims made Typhoon Morakot a more complex natural disaster than the 921
Earthquake. There were several reasons for this. First, while in the late 1990s the
Taiwanese news media had only just begun to incorporate the latest technology into news
gathering (e.g., satellite news-gathering vans), by 2009 the local news market had
become saturated, with eight 24-hour television news channels, four major newspapers,
and several online news sites swarming over unfolding events. Thus Typhoon Morakot
became a news war in the sense that countless journalists participated in the discursive
construction of a natural disaster as they tried to make sense of both the visual spectacle
and the resultant political storm. Second, this political storm manifested itself in a
particular way. In contrast to the late 1990s, when Taiwan's democracy was still in its
infancy1 and military threats from China were unrelenting2, by 2009 Taiwanese society
had opened up and Cross-Strait relations3 had dramatically changed—the once
adversarial situation between Taiwan and China gave way to economic and sociopolitical
exchange. This political transformation not only meant increasingly vocal opposition to
the government within Taiwan, but also increased Chinese involvement in Taiwan's
domestic affairs. This interference was seen in the government's response to Typhoon
Morakot—namely the initial rejection of foreign aid in a show of respect for the One-
China Policy. The resulting tensions made Typhoon Morakot a perfect stage for political
drama, creating an additional level of complexity on top of the devastation. Finally, the
fact that the majority of typhoon victims were aboriginal people—the largest ethnic
1The first direct presidential election, held in 1996, is deemed the beginning of true democracy in Taiwan. In contrast to previously when presidents were elected by members of the National Assembly for six-year terms, Taiwan now elects its presidents by popular vote for a term of four years. 2From 1995 to 1996, the People's Republic of China (PRC) carried out a series of missile tests in the Taiwan Strait area in a warning to then-President Lee Teng-Hui, whom it deemed to have strayed from the One-China Policy. 3Cross-Strait relations refers to relations between two political entities, China (PRC) and Taiwan (ROC), separated by the Taiwan Strait in the western Pacific Ocean.
8 minority group in Taiwan—further complicated disaster management. The government's decision to evacuate aboriginal victims from their damaged mountain tribal communities and relocate them in purpose-built permanent housing projects reflected problematic racial relations in Taiwan, the social prejudice suffered by the Taiwanese Aborigines, and the dominance of the Han Chinese. With the help of the internet and digital media, a group of amateur journalists spent four years following the lives of typhoon victims in the wake of the typhoon. Their reportage transformed a natural disaster into a cultural forum centered around issues of social justice and identity construction.
Thus, coverage of Typhoon Morakot provides both an outlet to witness the production and presentation of disaster news developed in a highly mature and competitive media environment and a glimpse into the international challenges and domestic predicaments faced by the newly democratized Taiwan. To understand the profound meaning of the Morakot story, it is necessary to review the historical context of the Taiwanese political, media, and racial landscapes—the context into which the story was born.
A Brief History of Taiwan
The modern history of Taiwan is characterized by colonialism. Taiwan has been a colony of several countries, including Portugal, the Netherlands, and Japan (the last from
1895 to 1945). The Kuomintang (KMT) regime from mainland China further prolonged the island’s colonial experience. The KMT came to Taiwan as a foreign political power when it retreated there following its military defeat by the Chinese Communist Party
(CCP) in 1947. The newly arrived KMT used military, juridical, administrative, and educational institutions to impose a Chinese nationality on locals in the face of resistance.
9 As Yip (2004) noted, "Mainland China and Taiwan may share a common linguistic and cultural heritage, but, like the two halves of the formerly divided Germany, their modern identities have been shaped by very different historical experiences" (p. 14). Cultural and social conflict between the newly arrived mainlanders and native Taiwanese was common. The 228 Massacre in 1947 was the most serious instance of such conflict. On
February 28, 1947, a female cigarette vendor was arrested by police and beaten to death.
This incident triggered large-scale political protests led by native Taiwanese social elites critical of the corruption and repression of the KMT regime. In response, the KMT government deployed troops that arrested and executed nearly 28,000 native Taiwanese, then declared martial law and a dozen other emergency decrees in 1949, all in the name of national security (Hong, 1999). From 1949 to 1987, the authoritarian KMT regime suppressed the cultural and linguistic heritage of native Taiwanese and tightly controlled all media outlets.
The KMT regime gradually began sharing power with native Taiwanese in the late 1980s, leading to significant social change and political restructuring in Taiwan.
With the lifting of martial law in 1987 and the legalization of the Democratic Progressive
Party (DPP) in 1989, Taiwanese society underwent rapid social liberation and political democratization. Many described the legitimization of the DPP as a political miracle, because it represented "the first time in the more than 5,000 years of recorded history of
China, [that] a group that was both legal and political was formed outside the chain of command under the head of state" (Rampal, 1994, p. 73). In 1996, Taiwan held its first direct, competitive presidential election. In 2000, Chen Shui-bian, a native Taiwanese and member of the DPP, defeated his KMT opponent to become president, heralding a
10 new era of greater democracy and cultural localization. The KMT returned to the presidential office in 2008, buoyed by the campaigning of Ma Ying-jeou, who was reelected in 2012. These events helped normalize the democratic transition of power in
Taiwan. A growing proportion of the local population identify as Taiwanese, rather than
Chinese and are quick to point out how the cultural and political systems of Taiwan are distinct from those of mainland China. Despite its legal status remaining controversial internationally, Taiwan is a modern nation-state and has an established "imagined community" (Anderson, 1983) and collective identity. Taiwan has rapidly transformed from a colony with a primarily rural society into a modern global industrial power. These changes have not only improved living standards, but have also transformed the media environment.
The Transformation of the Taiwanese Media Landscape
The transformation of the Taiwanese media landscape can be divided into two stages: the martial law era (1949‒1987)—the historical period during which the media was controlled and media content was censored by the state, and the post-martial law era
(since 1987)—the current period during which Taiwan's media environment has experienced commercialization, tabloidization, and sinification (中國化).
From 1949 into the late 1980s, all forms of media in Taiwan were tightly regulated due to martial law. The ruling KMT considered media a political tool to enhance nationalist ideology and social solidarity and subordinated freedom of expression to nation-building (Chen, 1998, p. 16). In other words, the role of media during this period was not to provide the latest information or critical commentary but to buttress the political position of the authority in power. Media control was exercised in
11 five different ways, including 1) state monopolization of the media; 2) control in the name of national security and in response to national emergencies; 3) control by licensing;
4) pressure on media outlets; and 5) violence against individual journalists (Hong, 1999, p. 42). These conditions led to all media institutions becoming aligned with the KMT in various ways. As documented in Weston's (2013) study, at that time, "if the media challenged the party-state's ideology, right to rule, or goal of recovering the mainland [i.e.,
China], its activities were likely to be classified as illegal" (p. 209). The publication law, implemented in June 1951, restricted the total number of newspapers permitted on the market and the number of pages each newspaper was permitted (Weston, 2013, p. 210).
Until the lifting of martial law in 1987, the total number of newspapers in Taiwan was frozen at 314, with each being restricted to 12 pages per issue (Rampal, 1994, p. 78; see also Lee, 1994). Similarly, the three broadcasting networks, namely TTV, CTV, and CTS, were run by the government and the military. During the first stage of its development,
Taiwan's media environment thus was KMT dominated, leaving almost no room for the development of private and commercial media or the creation of politically independent voices.
The lifting of martial law in 1987 saw the removal of restrictions on newspaper licenses and numbers of pages per issue, triggering a boom in the media industry. The number of newspapers in Taiwan grew from 31 to 249, while the number of pages per issue increased from 12 to anywhere between 30 and 50, with even more in weekend editions (Rampal, 1994, p. 79). Total daily newspaper circulation surged almost 50 percent, from 3.9 million in 1987 to 6 million in 1994 (Hong, 1999, p. 44). Similarly, the
4 Out of the 31 newspapers, four were run by the KMT, nine by the military, two by the government, and the remaining 16 were privately owned. A full list of these newspapers and the names of their owners can be found in Lee's (1994) article "Sparking a fire" (p. 167).
12 number of magazines published in Taiwan rapidly grew from 3,400 in 1988 to 5,700 in
1998 (Hong, 1999, p. 44). Moreover, the passage of the cable television law in 1993
legalized cable TV in Taiwan. The three broadcast networks found themselves facing a
growing number of cable networks, which provided a popular alternative for Taiwanese
audiences. More than 140 cable television systems, each providing an average of 70
channels, competed in 1999, including eight all-news cable channels offering 24-hour
news coverage with intensive analysis of important issues5 (Chiu & Chan-Olmsted, 1999,
p. 494). Records show that the cable network penetration rate stood at 81.6% of
Taiwanese households in December 2006, the highest in the Asia Pacific region (Hsu,
2014, p. 516).
Despite the large amount of registered newspapers, few enjoyed substantial
circulation and thus had significant sociopolitical influence. According to a study by Hsu
(2014), the four Taiwanese newspapers with the largest circulations in 2013 were Liberty
Times, Apple Daily, United Daily, and The China Times (2014). The rise of Liberty Times,
founded by Taiwanese-born banker Lin Ron-San in 1987, was of particular significance,
because it added a different voice to the media landscape. Although initially it had
difficulty competing with the more established pro-KMT Taiwanese newspaper titans—
The China Times and United Daily—the Liberty Times' pro-independence position and
close ties with the DPP helped it become the best-selling newspaper in the late 1990s
(Weston, 2013). Similarly, in the realm of cable networks, both FTV and SET were
deemed pro-DPP and pro-Taiwanese identity television channels.
5The eight 24-four news channels were TVBS, TVBS-N, SET (Sanli), CTI (Zhongtian), FTV (Mingshi), ERA (Niandai), EBC (Dongsen), USTV (Feifan).
13 Many believe that the liberalization of the media accelerated Taiwan’s political democratization by allowing diverse media discourse to express and debate varied and competing political perspectives (Chiu & Chan-Olmsted, 1999; Rawnsley & Gong, 2011).
Nevertheless, political partisanship remains rampant in news production in Taiwan.
Taiwanese journalists are often accused of "acting as mouthpieces for politicians or of letting their own political views color their reporting" (Rampal, 1994, p. 82). President
Ma Ying-jeou even labeled three media outlets "san-ming-zi" (sandwich)—a play on their Chinese names: Sanli (SET), Mingshi (FTV), and Ziyou Shibao (Liberty Times)—to highlight their pro-DPP position and so deflect their harsh criticism of him (Hsu, 2014, p.
527). Additionally, numerous examples have been uncovered of business owners offering gifts and money to news workers to ensure positive converge (Wu, 1993). Journalistic professionalism and ethics thus has become a major social issue in Taiwan.
The launch in 2003 of the Apple Daily, a Hong Kong-based newspaper known for its exaggerated reporting style and sensationalist graphics, created more problems for
Taiwanese journalism. The newspaper's name reflects the origin of guilt symbolically represented as an apple in the story of Adam and Eve; without the right and wrong associated with guilt there would be no news (Huo, 1995). Apple Daily entered the
Taiwanese market as a tabloid, "providing paparazzi-style scandal exposure and exhibiting a flair for flaunting sex and violence in full-color" (Ho & Sun, 2008, p. 103).
As Ho and Sun (2008) described, "the so-called 'Apple Effect' moved traditionally defined 'serious reporting' to celebrity/entertainment tabloids, so that only firms capable of transforming all types of information into 'entertainment' would survive" (p. 103). In only six months, Apple Daily won 10 percent of Taiwan’s total newspaper readership. By
14 the end of 2005, the circulation of Apple Daily surpassed that of two major newspapers,
The China Times and United Daily. The appeal of Apple Daily derived from its "reader- first" philosophy. Unlike other Taiwanese newspapers, which often favored governmental officials, politicians, and social elites, Apple Daily adopted a flexible and market-oriented strategy responsive to consumer demands and preferences (Tsai, 2005). To compete with
Apple Daily, all three established newspapers (i.e., Liberty Times, The China Times, and
United Daily) revolutionized their own formats and layouts and featured more paparazzi- style stories and sharper sensationalism. However, rather than winning readers back, these changes merely brought about the tabloidization of Taiwanese journalism. Within three years, the China Times lost 36 percent of its readership while United Daily lost 14 percent (Ho & Sun, 2008, p. 106). The Liberty Times and Apple Daily are currently the two leading newspapers in Taiwan (Table 1).
Year Liberty Times Apple Daily United Daily The China Times
2009 681,309 530,000 250,000 200,000
2013 622,781 383,000 150,000 100,000
TABLE 1 – DAILY NEWSPAPER CIRCULATION Average daily circulation of Taiwan's four major newspapers in 2009 and 2013 Source: Hsu, 2013, p. 516.
China's influence on Taiwan's media became increasingly visible in the late 2000s, especially after Ma Ying-Jeou became president in 2008. As Hsu (2014) summarized,
China employed several strategic tactics as it sought to control the Taiwanese media landscape. First, by investing financially in specific Taiwanese media outlets, such as the
China Times Group, the Chinese government was able to quickly transform The Chinese
Times into a pro-Beijing newspaper, which pushed a China-focused agenda and adopted a
15 pro-Beijing frame of reference. Second, by exerting pressure on media owners with business interests and/or investments in China, the Chinese government was able to compel certain media outlets to exercise self-censorship and avoid reporting on controversial China-related issues, such as human rights, Tibet, and Falun Gong. An illustrative example is SET cancelling its popular and long-running anti-China political talk show "Big Talk News" in June 2012. Sources confirmed that this decision was made in response to a combination of pressure from Beijing and a desire on the part of SET to sell its TV dramas to the Chinese market (Hsu, 2014, p. 529). Finally, the Chinese authorities attempt to change Taiwanese people's perceptions of China by placing
"advertorials" that resemble hard news in Taiwanese media (Hsu, 2014, p. 530).
According to Chang Chin-hwa, a professor in the Journalism Department at National
Taiwan University, these advertorials form part of China's "media warfare against
Taiwan"—a long-term propaganda effort with the ultimate goal of reunification (cited in
Hsu, 2014, p. 532). Consequently, the sinification of Taiwan's media is a warning sign of the erosion of press freedom—a nascent freedom that remains fragile even after the long fight to secure it.
This was the highly commercialized, sensationalized, and politicized media environment in which news coverage of Typhoon Morakot occurred. Thus, what was included in the mainstream Morakot story reflected not only the primary concerns of the
Taiwanese society but also a balancing act by media outlets as they weighed soft news to boost readership against hard news to inform the audience. Media must also consider the implications of controversial stories in a tenuous political landscape. Matters excluded from the mainstream Morakot story, such as aboriginal victims' post-disaster struggles,
16 highlighted issues that have long been silenced or marginalized in Taiwanese society. To understand this critical absence requires unpacking the evolution of the racial landscape in Taiwan.
Aborigines, Outsiders in Taiwan’s Imagined Community
Han Chinese, the dominant ethnic group in Taiwan, immigrated from China during the last 400 years. The Han Chinese in Taiwan can be further divided into three subethnic groups: Hoklo (73%), Hakka (12%), and Mainlanders (13%) (Brown, 2004).
The Hoklo and Hakka were the earliest Han Chinese arrivals, coming from southern
China (primarily Fujian and Guangdong Provinces) starting in the 17th century, while the
Mainlanders came more recently, arriving with the KMT regime after World War II
(1949). Despite their diverse cultures and sociopolitical experience, these subethnic groups share the common sentiment that as Han they are different from non-Han (i.e.,
Taiwanese Aborigines). In contrast to the Han, Taiwanese Aborigines are of
Austronesian descent, and share genetic and linguistic ties to other Austronesian ethnic groups, such as the peoples of the Philippines, Malaysia, Indonesia, Madagascar, and
Oceania (Harrison, 2003). According to the government, Taiwanese Aborigines currently comprise 13 tribes, with the largest being the Amis, Atayal, Paiwan, and Bunun.
Although Taiwan’s Aborigines inhabited the island for seven thousand years prior to Han migration, demographics have seen them become an ethnic minority and cultural other; the aboriginal population is currently about 530,000, or just two percent of the total national population (Council of Indigenous People, 2014). As Lan (2006) noted, "The imagined unity [of the Han Chinese] under the umbrella of Confucian culturalism requires the oppositional existence of the racial and ethnic other. Taiwanese Aborigines,
17 for this reason, have long been the objects of the colonial gaze" (p. 61). In Taiwan, the
Aborigines have become the “others within”.
The Taiwanese Aborigines experienced centuries of military conflicts and economic competition with various colonizers who implemented a series of policies to foster cultural and linguistic assimilation. Qing Dynasty literati depicted the Aborigines as dehumanized, primitive, and hypersexual savages (Teng, 2004). Subsequently, the
Japanese colonial regime (1895‒1945) used both repressive power (e.g., military force) and soft power (e.g., forming baseball teams) to transform the Taiwanese Aborigines from "uncivilized savages" into "loyal imperial subjects" (Lan, 2006, p. 61). Under
Japanese rule, the Hoklo and Hakka quickly developed a sense of "national consciousness" through which they set themselves apart from the colonizer. However, this new "national consciousness" excluded the Aborigines from the newly imagined community due to their "lack of civility" (Chiu, Hwang & Bairner, 2014, p. 352). The excerpt below is from an editorial written in 1931 for the Taiwan New People's
Newspaper. The editorial was a critique of policies used by Japan to govern Aborigines, but clearly reveals the racial alienation between Han Chinese and the aboriginal population. The editorial stated:
Due to their lack of knowledge, the barbarians habitually use weapons to resist outsiders. If they had substantial knowledge, they would not use weapons. They should employ public opinion and writing to fight, because the pen is the intellectuals’ weapon (Cited in Chiu, Hwang & Bairner, 2014, p. 352).
During the postwar period (after 1949), with the relocation of the KMT regime from Mainland China to Taiwan, Taiwanese society underwent a relatively successful phase of industrialization and economic restructuring, rapidly transforming from a primarily agricultural society to a modern industrial power. In pursuit of opportunities to
18 improve their living situation, Aborigines migrated in waves from rural to urban areas.
This migration inevitably increased cross-ethnic contact for aboriginal people, as well as political submission to the state and assimilation into Han culture (Lan, 2006; Teng,
2004). However, Aborigines continue to face economic and social barriers, including high unemployment and low education, as well as suffering from such issues as excessive drinking and high suicide rates, particularly among their urban communities.
The 1990s saw a major shift in Taiwan's racial boundaries as a result of the affirmation of Aboriginal ethnic identity and political capital. In his concept of a new and inclusive Taiwanese identity, one that included Aborigines, Hoklo, Hakka, and
Mainlanders, then-President Lee Teng-hui highlighted the vital role played by each ethnic group in Taiwanese identity. In 1994, following a decade-long struggle by grassroots activists, the government adopted the term "yuanzhumin" (literally "original inhabitants") as the new official appellation for Taiwan's Aborigines (Lan, 2006). Although many saw this new narrative of national membership as a political move by the Lee Administration to establish an autonomous and distinct Taiwanese identity to contrast Chinese identity
(Brown, 2004), it nevertheless confirmed Aborigines as a key constituency in Taiwan's imagined community.
Since their incorporation into the national rhetoric known as the New Taiwanese identity, Aborigines have come to be seen as part of the "us" by many Han Chinese in contemporary Taiwan. However, this rhetorical egalitarianism has confronted aboriginal people with a new form of what Bonilla-Silva (2010) called "color-blind racism", where race is claimed to no longer be an issue, despite discrimination continuing to impact their everyday lives. As Doane (2007) contends, the core belief of a color-blind racial ideology
19 is that "race does not play a significant role in the distribution of resources and that racism is essentially a thing of the past" (p. 107). This racial ideology works as a framework that the Han Chinese use to legitimatize the persistent racial inequality resulting from historic and systematic disenfranchisement. Thus, similar to Bonilla-
Silva's (2010) study of African Americans, the long-standing poverty issue facing aboriginal people can be explained away as the result of individual choices (i.e.,
Aborigines failed to seize economic opportunities to which they enjoyed equal access) or attributed to stereotypical cultural features (i.e., that Aborigines are lazy and unmotivated).
This color-blind racial ideology was pervasive in media discourse during and after
Typhoon Morakot. Statistics show that the majority (80%) of typhoon victims were aboriginals living in mountain tribal communities (Chiu, 2010). Many were buried alive in the middle of the night under landslides triggered by the heavy rainfall. The disaster decimated families and destroyed the tribal communities in which their social networks and cultural customs were deeply rooted. As the most powerless segment of society, the
Aborigines were both the hardest hit and the least likely to be able to access adequate evacuation resources. However, the mainstream media quickly presented the dire situation of Morakot's aboriginal victims as self-inflicted. Many questioned the decision of aboriginal people to continue living in mountain communities that had been declared unsafe after the 921 Earthquake. Some even argued, "our precious social resources should not be wasted on the irresponsible choices of individuals" (cited in Huang, 2009, p.
78). Another type of media discourse blamed aboriginal victims for "exotic cultural practices" that sometimes conflicted with the national environmental policies of the Han
20 Chinese-controlled government. For example, a United Daily editorial dated August 13,
2009 stated,
Xiaolin Village was possibly inundated by mudslides because its inhabitants employed deep plowing techniques to plant ginger and taro in massive quantities, destroying both the physical contours and geologic structure of the mountains. This aboriginal agricultural practice disrupted the natural ecology, leading to entire villages being wiped out and the loss of the aboriginal people’s ancestral land (Cited in S. Ho, 2013, p. 23).
This mainstream news narrative, which aligned with modern environmental rhetoric, immediately gained public support and came to influence government plans for victim evacuation and relocation.
In most disasters, the government handles housing issues in three stages: 1) emergency shelters are initially established near the evacuees' permanent homes so they have a safe place to await the passing of the external threat; 2) temporary housing then offers victims interim or long term living arrangements that allow them to resume their household responsibilities and activities; and 3) finally permanent housing provides residential facilities victims can use to reestablish their life routines over an indefinite time horizon (Quarantelli, 1982). Temporary housing thus serves an important intermediary role for victims, allowing them to adapt to environmental pressures and discuss their permanent living situation as a community (Quarantelli, 1982). However, this significant housing option was not provided in the wake of Typhoon Morakot.
According to Du Ming-Han, Executive Director of World Vision Taiwan, the government was reluctant to provide temporary housing after Morakot because of lessons from the 921 Earthquake. As Du noted, "Some evacuees were still living in what had originally been defined as temporary housing years after the earthquake. This type of illegal occupation became a thorny issue for the government to handle" (Liang, 2009, ¶
21 13). Furthermore, based on the Policy of Homeland Recovery and Conservation, the government favored "letting the mountains rest", which required keeping mountain areas free of human habitation and agriculture. Therefore, when the Buddhist Tzu Chi
Foundation proposed building permanent houses for the evacuees, the government was more than happy to "outsource" its responsibility for the matter to a prestigious religious group (Hsieh, 2010, ¶ 22). The government believed this would permanently resolve the typhoon victims' living situation, and moreover would be fully consistent with environmental policies.
Three weeks after the typhoon, without any deliberative public discussions, the government abruptly announced that the Tzu Chi Foundation would start construction of permanent housing in the form of Great Love Village, a project whose design was based on Han Chinese and Buddhist cultural and religious customs—both of which sometimes conflicted with the cultural heritage and Christian beliefs of the aboriginal people (S. Ho,
2013). In other words, the government showed no intention to rebuild the damaged communities and help the aboriginal victims resume their original way of life (S. Ho,
2013). Whether to accept permanent housing or return to their damaged tribal communities thus became the ultimate quandary for aboriginal victims in the wake of
Typhoon Morakot. Since a unanimous decision was impossible the dilemma caused internal division and mistrust within aboriginal tribes. Typhoon Morakot thus was more than a physical disaster to its aboriginal victims, but was also a symbolic crisis that forced the negotiation of their racial identity and cultural heritage in the Han-Chinese dominated society.
22 Five years after the typhoon, Morakot remained a controversial word in Taiwan and one that represented the emergence of a risk society, the rupture of the social contract, and distrust in political authority. Through interviews with the journalists involved and analysis of the coverage they produced, this dissertation aims to examine the political and cultural role of Typhoon Morakot coverage—a unique Asian case that could potentially contribute to the current scholarship on disaster journalism.
Overview of Dissertation Chapters
This dissertation is divided into seven chapters. Chapter 1 details the historical, cultural, political, and institutional contexts of this research. It provides a detailed description of Typhoon Morakot in Taiwan as well as an overview of the rapid transformation of the Taiwanese media environment after WWII to situate the practice of disaster journalism in this specific media context. It also unpacks the racial relationship in
Taiwan and the social injustice long faced by the primary minority group—Taiwanese
Aborigines—injustice that became especially evident after Typhoon Morakot. This chapter helps readers unfamiliar with Taiwan better understand the background to this research.
Chapter 2 reviews the scholarship on the intersection of news media and natural disasters to reveal both the breadth of scholarly interest in this field and the varying perspectives they represent. Furthermore, this chapter discusses the research methods used, including in-depth interviews and various textual analyses, and the purposes they serve in this project. The final section of this chapter details the research data.
Chapter 3 delves into the process of news production to elucidate the character of disaster news coverage, both generally and specifically in the case of Typhoon Morakot.
23 Based on in-depth interviews with 20 mainstream journalists, this chapter notes that even in times of disaster, which seem to provide journalists with higher levels of operational autonomy, their practices are still highly constrained by external factors, such as on-site technological options, extended newsroom control, and their continued reliance on official sources. Additionally, the coverage they produced was highly influenced by the cultivated interpretive framework and the phenomenon of pack journalism. Together, these external and internal factors contributed to the similarity of news coverage across different media platforms. However, the most interesting finding is the gender division that became clear when journalists discussed their personal emotion while covering
Morakot. While most male informants reported to be emotionally intact, female informants described themselves feeling stressed and vulnerable in the situation. Their testimony to some extent concluded that rationality conflated with masculinity ruled the domain of disaster reporting.
The next three chapters focus on the news representation of Typhoon Morakot as constructed by three independent media that nevertheless influence one another, namely television, newspapers, and alternative media. Chapter 4 examines the first week of broadcast news coverage of Typhoon Morakot and the televisual construction of public emotions. A series of televisual techniques were used, including such as interruption of regularly scheduled commercials to signal the threat of the impending disaster, the live broadcast of news which invited the audience to witness the shocking devastation, and the visual dramatization of tears used to signify the emotion of grief, of anger, and of pride. And finally, six days after Morakot hit Taiwan, the news networks even broke
24 news conventions to produce a cinematic vignette to pay tribute to the first responders, or heroes as they called them.
As found in Chapter 5, in the following month of newspaper coverage, there was a progression of public emotion from grief to anger. It became essential to identify a culprit to assign blame and political accountability. This journalistic investigation was conducted through a variety of framing approaches, including historical analogy to compare Morakot with previous local disasters as well as disasters that happened afar, such as Hurricane Katrina. Second, Taiwanese newspapers heavily quoted foreign sources, such as CNN, New York Times, and Washington Post, to justify their criticism of president Ma and his administration. To repair its image, in the later phase of Typhoon
Morakot, the Ma administration began to use media events, such as international press conferences, its cabinet reshuffle, and its granting of entry to the Dali Lama, as attempts to regain public trust. On September 3, almost a month after Typhoon Morakot, the majority of mainstream media dropped their coverage and started to focus on a new crisis
─Bird Flu.
Chapter 6 examines the four years of coverage of Morakot by 88news, an alternative media website established to follow Typhoon Morakot and the living situation of aboriginal victims in its aftermath. With coverage starting in late September, 88news aimed to fight the premature closure offered by mainstream media. Adopting nonconventional journalistic norms─transparency not objectivity─and nonconventional news sources─victims first, not official sources─88news produced an unheard version of the Morakot story. Their coverage not only questioned the way the government outsourced the relief effort to Tzu-Chi, a religious humanitarian organization, but also
25 questioned the way Tzu-Chi sought to assimilate the Aboriginal victims. Overall, 88news documented the mundane aspects of aboriginal victims' everyday lives in the aftermath and thus portrayed a real rather than ideal progression of recovery.
Finally, Chapter 7 concludes this dissertation. This final chapter employed the concept of "social drama" (Turner, 1981) to review the journalistic rituals and political rites associated with Typhoon Morakot. It also elucidates the healing role of disaster journalism in general and specifically in Morakot coverage─emotional news narratives that provide the community an opportunity to mourn and thus to heal. The empirical findings of this dissertation posed two questions to journalism at large, namely the role of emotionality in journalism and the potential of emerging alternative media.
26 CHAPTER 2 OVERVIEW OF THEORY AND METHODS
The question of what is a disaster actually is easily answered by those directly affected. Even in the academic discussion disasters are usually conceived of as clearly defined entities which have distinct causes and effects. Such a perspective, however, easily loses sight of the interactive quality of disastrous events as well as of the social constitutedness of disasters, which are recognized as such only through interpretive procedures. Moreover, as an inter-subjective social reality they are constituted through communicative practices alone. (Bergmann, Egner, & Wulf, 2009, p. 1)
This chapter attempts to build the theoretical and methodological foundation for this dissertation. It starts with a review of disaster scholarship in social science to demonstrate the role of social forces in transforming a nature-caused event into a disaster.
Second, it examines the intersection of disaster and news media and how each contributes to the other. Focusing on the cultural and political implication of disaster coverage, this section employs the concept of ritual—both consensual and conflictual—to show how disaster journalism simultaneously creates social solidarity and political empowerment.
Finally, it discusses the methods and data used in this dissertation to answer the previously mentioned research questions.
Conceptualizing Modern Disasters
Cultures around the world have for centuries termed natural disasters "acts of
God" (Thompson, 1955). In his historical analysis of the earthquake that struck Carinthia and Northern Italy in 1348, Rohr (2003) found that local people adopted narratives of divine rage to comprehend and cope with the utter devastation. Dundes observed that "the flood myth is one of the most widely diffused narratives" and has been used to demonstrate the enormous power of nature and the inability of humans to control it (cited in Lule, 2001, p.173). In short, natural calamities are traditionally explained as divine
27 punishment to humble humankind and as a signal directing those who have strayed back to the correct path. For their part, survivors will overcome, rebuild, and thrive once again
(Lule, 2001).
Only after the Lisbon earthquake of 1755 did western societies begin to adopt a scientific perspective in understanding natural disasters—including the use of perspectives from social science. Defining the Lisbon earthquake as the first modern disaster, Dynes (2000) argued that its timing and location make it important, because it was "the first earthquake to affect a 'modern' European city at a time when there was a rethinking of the nature of personality, knowledge, science, and religion, a period which has come to be known as the Enlightment" (p. 99). Traditional religious perceptions thus were challenged by a growing number of informed Enlightenment thinkers with secular interpretations of this disastrous seismic event. These thinkers not only attributed the
Lisbon earthquake to natural forces, but further suggested that the event could only be interpreted in terms of its sociocultural context, thus signifying the "embryonic social understanding of disaster" (Dynes, 2000, p. 114).
The application of a social science perspective to understanding disasters emerged in the United States in the early 1950s. Initiated in the wake of the Cold War, societal concern about the risk of foreign attack was reflected in early disaster research that adopted a rather limited focus on collective behavior under stress. Pioneering researchers working closely with national government agencies saw natural and technological disasters as providing useful settings to examine emergent collective behavior, and particularly to illuminate whether large-scale physical deconstruction and social disruption led to public panic and demoralization (Quarantelli, 1987).
28 As early publications showed, disasters produce emergent social structures that bring out the best, rather than the worst, in affected groups (Tierney, 2007). Positive outcomes of disasters include enhanced community cohesiveness and solidarity, reduced antisocial behavior, development of therapeutic communities, suspension of pre-disaster conflict and partisan divisions to accelerate community rehabilitation, and collective adaption and innovation in response to disruptions (Tierney, 2007, p. 505). Notably, such public responses contrast with those in earlier "disaster myths," in which disasters are conceived to be accompanied by withdrawal behaviors, such as public panic, flight by victims, and helplessly awaiting external aid (Quarantelli, 1960), as well as violence, such as looting, riots, and other deviant behaviors characteristic of civil unrest (Tierney,
Beve, & Kuligowski, 2006).
In the 1960s and 1970s, disaster researchers continued to identify the diverse patterns of disasters and to develop the notion of consensus and dissensus crises based on their empirical findings. Consensus crises refer to tragic events "where there is agreement on the meaning of the situation, the norms and values that are appropriate, and priorities that should be followed," whereas dissensus crises involve situations of conflict where the cause and meaning of the event and related priorities are contested (Quarantelli &
Dynes, 1977, p. 23). Natural disasters are events caused by natural forces, characterized by short-term social disruption, identifiable victims, clear causes, and responsible institutions, and to which government or volunteer organizations respond with restoration plans (Picou, Brunsma & Overfelt, 2010; see also Quarantelli, 1998). Hence, natural disasters are regarded as consensus crises that increase community morale and solidarity and decrease conflict, partisan divisions, and antisocial behavior (Tierney, 2007). The
29 recovery process following natural disasters is deemed therapeutic, allowing affected communities to come together to provide mutual support and engage in innovative social readjustment (Drabek, 1986; Fritz, 1961). While there are cases, such as Hurricane
Katrina, in which looting does seem to occur, these reports have been found to be largely exaggerated and a strategy to gain support from the national guard (Tierney, Beve, &
Kuligowski, 2006).
Technological disasters refer to human-caused accidents, technological and systematic failures, and toxic contamination, with examples including the Bhopal accident as well as the Three Mile Island and Chernobyl nuclear plant accidents.
Technological disasters severely and irreparably damage ecological systems and affect communities over long periods. Moreover, damage is usually complex, solutions are elusive, and identifying culprits and victims is difficult. Furthermore, recovery and compensation plans are often delayed by strategic legal maneuvering. Technological disasters thus frequently become contested events, categorized as dissensus crises, with negative effects on the community such as short-term antisocial behavior and long-term mental and physical trauma, heightened distrust of authorities, and protracted litigation that delays recovery (Picou, Brent, & Duane, 2004; see also Marshall, Picou, &
Schlichtmann, 2004).
Early disaster research was highly influenced by the structural functional theory that prevailed in the social sciences after World War II (Stallings, 1988; Wolensky &
Miller, 1983). Focusing on system equilibration, the dominant view considered disasters negative disruptions to the social order, with affected communities first adapting, before eventually either resuming old behaviors or innovating new ones in a stabilized
30 environment (Perry & Quarantelli, 2005). Fritz (1961) best summarized this viewpoint in his classic definition of disasters as
accidental or uncontrollable events, actual or threatened, that are concentrated in time and space, in which a society or a relatively self-sufficient subdivision of society, undergoes severe danger, and incurs such losses to its members and physical appurtenances that the social structure is disrupted and the fulfillment of all or some of the essential functions of the society is prevented. (p. 655)
Although Fritz's definition of disaster, which is event-based, time and space concentrated, physical-damage focused, and problem-solving oriented, has since been contested and challenged, it has been widely cited by scholars and has set the overall tone of mainstream disaster studies for decades.
Researchers began to question the conceptualizations and findings of earlier disaster research in the 1980s. Challenges to classic frameworks focused on the assumption that natural disasters are distinctive events caused (solely) by natural forces.
Even the term natural disaster has been challenged as leaving no room for human agency in the causation of these events. Researchers argued that over-emphasizing the physical agent of disasters produces an environmental determinism that ignores social factors and human actions (Blaikie, Cannon, & Wisner, 1994). As Quarantelli wrote, "there can never be a natural disaster; at most there is a conjuncture of certain physical happenings and certain social happenings" (cited in Bolin & Stanford, 1998, p. 4). Although an earthquake is a natural phenomenon caused by geophysical dynamics, it often becomes a disaster only through a vulnerable and failing social system. Additionally, the assumption that disasters are time-space concentrated events excludes many diffuse and deadly phenomena, such as famines and epidemics, from the disaster category. As Westgate and
O'Keefe noted, "the emphasis on a specific event as an identifying feature [of disasters] is
31 a pro-Western, pro-technology, pro-capitalism bias" that becomes a major impediment preventing researchers from identifying calamities unfolding over longer periods in underdeveloped countries (cited in Quarantelli & Dynes, 1977, p. 24). Still others have argued that disasters should be seen as inevitable social consequences that reflect the characteristics of their location, such as industrialization, urbanization, and globalization
(Hewitt, 1983; Tierney, 2007). As such, natural disasters demonstrate "the ongoing social order, its everyday relations to the habitat and the larger historical circumstances that shape or frustrate these matters" (Hewitt, 1983, p. 25). Consequently, rather than seeing disasters as individual natural events originating in earth and atmospheric systems, the social construction perspective seeks to understand disasters as social processes and social constructions caused by existing social structures and material practices in human societies (Bolin & Stanford, 1998).
In light of the social construction perspective, analysts coined the term disaster gerrymandering to demonstrate how disasters are shaped by political and institutional practices and designated to serve their interests at the national level (Platt, 1999). In the
United States, the distribution of federal relief to disaster areas requires presidential approval of a request from the governor of the affected state. However, the definition of a major disaster is vague, and the decision to issue a disaster declaration is influenced by a state's ability to rapidly estimate economic damage, election year politics, and the media.
As Klinenberg (2002) argued in Heat Wave, despite heat waves killing more people annually than all other natural disasters combined, because they do not damage physical property they are not considered major disasters equivalent to earthquakes and hurricanes,
32 and hence do not qualify for presidential disaster declarations. These same political factors determine the entitlements, aid, and benefits given to disaster victims.
In line with the social construction perspective, scholars have developed the vulnerability approach to disaster to unveil the embedded social inequality and politics of poverty disguised by the supposed naturalness of disasters (Cannon, 1994). As Hewitt noted, "Disasters, as social processes, are shaped and structured by the sociocultural formations and political and economic practices that exist prior to the onset of a hazard event" (cited in Bolin & Stanford, 1998, p. 2). Although natural disasters are generally not seen to discriminate, recent literature has shown that their impact is determined by the socioeconomic status of the affected group, including class, race, gender, occupation, and social position, rather than the ranking of the event on the Richter or Beaufort scale
(Olive-Smith, 2002). Vulnerability describes the human capacity to resist and recover from disasters and varies with social and economic capital. The example of Hurricane
Katrina6 clearly demonstrates the correlation between vulnerability and socioeconomic circumstances, as described in the following.
In New Orleans, however, topographic gradients doubled as class and race gradients, and as the Katrina evacuation so tragically demonstrated, those better off had cars to get out and credit cards and bank accounts for emergency hotels and supplies. Their immediate families likely had resources to support their evacuation, and the wealthier also had insurance policies for rebuilding. Not just the market but successive administrations from the federal to the urban scale, made the poorest population in New Orleans most vulnerable. (Smith, 2006, ¶ 3)
6 Hurricane Katrina, which struck the Gulf Coast of the United States on August 29, 2005, was one of the most costly and deadly natural disasters in American history. According to the Tropical Cyclone Report (2005), Katrina claimed at least 1,836 lives and caused US$81 billion in economic damage. The hurricane also created the largest internal "diaspora of displaced people" the US has experienced to date and this diaspora is ongoing (Brunsma, 2007, p. xv). Many scholars view Katrina as a social event, rather than a natural disaster, and thus as involving many complicated issues deeply embedded in the US social structure. As Negra noted (2010), Hurricane Katrina "manifested not only a profoundly unequal national culture and the rupture of the social contract, it also seemed to lay bare the normalization of risk in American life" (p. 1). Six years later, Katrina remains synonymous in America with distrust of the government and social inequality.
33 Post-disaster reconstruction, a tempting opportunity for the public and private sectors to gentrify affected regions for profit, often increases political and economic power differentials between racial and class groups (Negra, 2010, p. 11). Rebuilt urban areas can be tourist magnets, but are typically too expensive for low-income, working-class victims. Natural disasters thus often resemble social disasters in that they increase social exploitation and oppression and exacerbate existing social differences.
Finally, the nature of contemporary disasters in the highly urbanized and industrialized 21st century world renders classical disaster codification and associated findings increasingly problematic. In predicting public responses to disaster, it is becoming increasingly difficult to maintain the dichotomy between natural (consensus) and technological (dissensus) disasters. United Nation Disaster Risk Reduction (UNISDR) office head Margareta Wahlstrom (2012) observed, "Given the rapid pace of urbanization, and the technology base that a well-resourced city requires, the risk of 'synchronous failure' is growing constantly" (¶ 5). In today’s world, damage from natural disasters can display a ripple effect as disasters impact technological systems with catastrophic results.
The Fukushima Earthquake vividly demonstrated this phenomenon. As a natural disaster, the Fukushima Earthquake was an 8.9 magnitude geological event that rattled northeastern Japan and triggered a 14-meter high tsunami that damaged two major coastal prefectures, Miyagi and Fukushima. As a technological disaster, the Fukushima
Earthquake disrupted the critical power supply for the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear-power plant while the tsunami disabled back-up generators at the plant, causing the worst nuclear disaster since the Chernobyl accident in 1986 (Freer, 2012). A complex, large-
34 scale catastrophe like the Fukushima Earthquake thus challenges traditional disaster typologies.
Given that the increasing hybridization of natural and technological disasters renders a priori classification ineffective, scholars in disaster research are seeking alternative views and using the concept of the na-tech disaster (i.e., a combined natural and technological disaster) to define the evolution of modern catastrophes (Picou,
Brunsma, & Overfelt, 2010, p. 6). This evolution includes the long-term political, economic, cultural, and environmental impacts of such disasters, as well as the mental health and recovery issues facing affected communities (Picou, Brunsma, & Overfelt,
2010, p. 6). Consequently, by highlighting the complexity of contemporary disasters, researchers and responsible institutions strive to develop innovative techniques for post- disaster intervention and rehabilitation to "enable therapeutic processes and constrain corrosive processes" in the aftermath of disasters (Picou, Brunsma, & Overfelt, 2010, p. 9, italics original).
Although not exhaustive, the above discussions have shown the evolution of social science research on disasters. Modern natural disasters are considered to represent collisions between natural forces, social institutions, and human actors that must be understood from both scientific and sociological perspectives to fully grasp their complexity. Realizing the lack of concern of disaster research with broader theoretical issues, disaster researchers advocate linking disaster studies with related specialties, such as the study of risk (Beck, 1992) and environmental sociology (Perrow, 1984; Vaughan,
1996). Other disaster scholars suggest focusing explicitly on race, gender, ethnicity, and social class in disasters to keep pace with concerns in mainstream sociology (Tierney,
35 2007). Nevertheless, all of these perspectives overlook the close connection between disaster studies and media studies. This is not to say that scholarly work on disasters has never addressed media. However, when mentioned, media are often treated as simply transmitting disaster information, as seen in studies of crisis communication.
The role of media during natural disasters must be addressed, because most people experience catastrophic events only indirectly via media representations. In today's world it is through the media that people bear witness to tragedies and suffering.
Using Hurricane Katrina as an example, "fewer than several hundred thousand people witnessed the storm in person. For the other 99.8 percent of Americans, the disaster was a media experience with lasting implications for public opinion and action" (Mayer, 2008, p. 178). Media not only transmit disaster images and information, but also influence how disasters become known, responded to, and remembered. In other words, media articulate the political significance and cultural meaning of disasters. Consequently, to downplay the role of media in constructing and interpreting disasters is to ignore a vital analytical perspective.
Disasters and the News Media
Communication studies dealing with disasters have mainly focused on the development of disaster cognition and information diffusion. As summarized by the
National Research Council's Committee on Disasters and Mass Media, the role of the media in a crisis is to prepare the public for potential emergencies, disseminate disaster information and coping strategies, and provide reassurance or assuage grief and guilt in the aftermath (cited in Wilkins, 1984, p. 51). Most Western disaster communication research has focused on the media's ability to transmit instant and accurate warning
36 messages in response to disasters. A similar trend has been found in Asian scholarship on the relationship between disaster and news media. In recent years, a few Chinese and
Taiwanese scholars have attempted to study the function of journalism during natural disasters, especially in the wake of particularly devastating events such as the 921
Earthquake (1999) and Typhoon Morakot (2009) in Taiwan, and the Sichuan Earthquake
(2008) in China. However, most of these studies have focused on the technological dimension of information and on efforts to improve crisis communication. Studies in this tradition have concluded that "better communication technology and democratic access to the media are what prevent a hazard from becoming a disaster, because the content creates disaster awareness and risk perception among [the] audience" (Perez-Lugo, 2001, p. 56). The assumed linear relationships between the three key actors in disaster communication, namely the governmental officials who generate disaster information, the media conveying that information, and the public that receive the information and modify their perceptions and behaviors accordingly, underscore an influential tradition in communication studies—the transmission view of communication.
The transmission view describes the sources and content of disaster coverage, but does not consider the reasons for specific topic selection or the profound impact of the mediated representation of disasters. As Riegert and Olsson (2007) asked, "if information dissemination is paramount in extreme crisis, why does television news continue live for hour after hour, with no new information forthcoming?" (pp. 143‒144). Rather than giving a factual account of disaster related developments, the news media clearly also function as "psychologist, comforter, and co-mourner" to help society work through a tragic event (Riegert & Olsson, 2007, p.147). Furthermore, Pantti, Wahl-Jorgensen, and
37 Cottle (2012) suggested that the way in which disasters are "signaled and symbolized, turned into spectacles or effectively rendered silent on the media stage, can have far- reaching consequences for the victims and survivors directly affected, for surrounding communities, and for the conduct of social relations and political power more widely" (p.
23). Therefore, it is important to recognize that the media not only communicate but also construct disasters, conditioning their visibility, priority, cultural meaning, and political significance. To better interpret cultural nuances and political complexity in news coverage of Typhoon Morakot, this dissertation employs a cultural approach, inspired by
Carey's (1989) ritual view of communication, to examine its production and representation.
Studying Journalism Through the Concept of Ritual
Drawing on several research traditions, Carey (1989) proposed adopting a ritual view of communication to understand its cultural function of communication in human society—a view that "is directed not toward the extension of messages in space but toward the maintenance of society in time; not the act of imparting information but the representation of shared beliefs" (p. 18). In this view, the ritual form of communication is valuable because it brings meaningful order to our lived experience. In other words, communication is a ritualistic process through which social members are united in
"fellowship and commonality", while their cultural world is produced and maintained
(Carey, 1989, p. 18).
Examining journalism using the cultural approach, Carey (1989) suggested that reading newspapers is a "ritual act", because it is "a situation in which nothing new is learned but in which a particular view of the world is portrayed and confirmed" (p. 20).
38 As illustrated in his example of the international trade negotiations between the US,
Germany, and Japan, newspapers do not merely provide information but offer a narrative
"portrayal of the contending forces in the world" (i.e., "American patriots" versus
"ancient enemies") (Carey, 1989, p. 20). Journalism thus is a specific cultural creation that helps a collective confirm its core values while "genres of journalism are seen as forms of story-telling inherited from the culture in which they work" (Riegert & Olsson,
2007, p. 144). But how do the "contending forces" mentioned by Carey (1989) work on different levels of news making to produce a particular cultural perspective for readers (p.
20)? The answer to this question lies in the work of Ehrlich (1996). Using the concept of ritual to study journalism, as Ehrlich (1996) suggested, can connect conventional journalistic practice ("individual or occupational level") and newsroom culture
("organizational level") to the reproduction of the social status quo ("institutional level")
(p. 5).
Journalists use a series of routinized practices to handle daily events (Tuchman,
1973). These structured responses to events guide journalists in both daily practice and when confronting great uncertainty. Journalistic routines include presenting both sides of a story to show impartiality, providing supportive evidence to enhance credibility, using quotes and quotation marks to demonstrate neutrality, and employing an inverted pyramid format to structure and prioritize information in a news story (Tuchman, 1972).
These routinized procedures, known as the "strategic ritual of objectivity" (Tuchman,
1972), allow journalists to develop seemingly objective accounts of and explanations for the social world they cover, while avoiding charges of bias and unfairness. In short, these ritualized practices are a defensive mechanism that helps newsmakers deal with
39 "continual pressures [such] as deadlines, possible libel suits, and anticipated reprimands of superiors" (Tuchman, 1972, p. 660).
This strategic ritual is performed at both the individual and organizational levels of news-making. News organizations typically rely on routine procedures, such as newsbeat systems, to ensure a steady flow of news production. The newsbeat system refers to the routine assignments given to journalists based on topic or territory (Cook,
1998). This system transforms the social world into compartmentalized journalistic domains, meaning stories that do not neatly fit into one of these domains can fall between the cracks. Furthermore, authoritative individuals belonging to a given newsbeat (e.g., institutional spokespersons or committee chairmen) often function as primary sources for journalists, enhancing story accountability. These individuals have titles that indicate their privileged knowledge positions (i.e., "they have more 'facts' in their disposal"), supporting the accuracy and depth of their information (Tuchman, 1972, p. 672).
Favoring institutional and authoritative sources thus adds structural bias to journalists' news coverage, constructing a social reality that primarily reflects the interests and perspectives of particular social classes (Cook, 1998; see also Hall et al., 1978).
The idea that news coverage is scripted by authoritative agents becomes even more prominent during special occasions, such as national ceremonies and political races.
Describing these televised special occasions as "media events", Dayan and Katz (1992) proposed a three-way categorization: "contests" (e.g., the Olympic Games, presidential debates), "conquests" (e.g., moon landings), and "coronations' (e.g., royal weddings) (pp.
30‒33). As "high holidays of mass communication," media events are carefully preplanned and scripted ceremonies often hosted by official institutions, produced by
40 news media that broadcast them in real time, and viewed by large audiences in multiple locations who invest their viewing with special attention and emotion (Dayan & Katz,
1992, p. 1). In other words, media events are co-productions between political establishments and news media that interrupt not only normal broadcasting schedules but also the "natural rhythms" of the everyday viewing experience (Carey, 1998, p. 44). Thus the significance of media events comes from their ritual function of uniting a collective through shared viewing experiences as they turn private homes into public and cultural spaces in which "collective identities and solidarities essential for the functioning of differentiated societies are forged" (Curran & Liebes, 1998, p. 5).
From the individual level of news-writing, through the organizational level of news-making, and finally to the institutional level of media event production, the concept of ritual offers a useful device to connect a particular journalistic culture to the general culture or worldview of its audience (Ehrlich, 1996). Despite their routinized and repetitive nature, journalistic practices are performed organically, not mechanically. To consider these practices as regulations imposed on journalists is to underestimate their symbolic power. In fact, the strategic ritual of objectivity in journalism is highly valued as a professional ideal (Tuchman, 1972). As argued by Philipsen, "ritual pays homage to a sacred object or principle while enacting and expressing a participant's close identification with the symbolic code of a group" (cited in Ehrilch, 1996, p. 6). In this regard, through mastering the news storytelling craft journalists establish their professionalism and confirm their membership of the "interpretive community" (Zelizer,
1993). These shared organizational procedures become a way for journalists to create professional boundaries that differentiate them from amateurs.
41 Studying Disaster Journalism Through the Concept of Social Drama
Because of their unpredictable dynamic and conflictive nature, natural disasters threaten routinized journalistic practices and the conventional power structure made up of authorities, journalists, and citizens. For instance, extended reporting of disasters often occurs against the government's will, renders government institutions vulnerable to public criticism, and pressures authorities into immediate action. In such situations, journalists are expected to be assertive and independent as they convey public dissent and disagreement with officials. Furthermore, news workers employ resonant symbols, dramatic visualizations, and emotions to enhance their narrations in disaster coverage to maintain viewership. Disaster journalism thus presents a "social drama," using the term of anthropologist Victor Turner (1981), through which public dissent and resentment are conveyed and existing power structures challenged.
Social drama, according to Turner (1981), describes a disruptive event occurring within a group with a shared culture, values, and interests. The cause of this disruption can emerge from impulsive heated feelings or from deliberate actions aimed at revealing hidden social issues (Turner, 1981, p. 146). Either way, such dramas often proceed through four stages: 1) the "breach" phase, in which there occurs a public breach of the long existing "rule of morality, law, custom, or etiquette" (Turner, 1981, p. 146); 2) the
"crisis" phase, in which tensions manifest and divide society into various factions (Turner,
1981, p. 146); 3) the "redressive" phase, in which the authorities provide adjustive mechanisms, ranging from "personal advice and informal attribution to formal juridical and legal machinery", to limit further widening of the breach (Turner, 1981, p. 147); and
4) the final phase, which can be either the "reintegration" of once divided and contested
42 social groups or, if redressive attempts have failed and the breach is deemed irreparable,
"spatial separation" between social groups (Turner, 1981, p. 147). Although Turner's
(1981) social drama was based on his observations of political rites in a primitive society, this concept represents a "universal processual form" in which different social actors employ particular means and resources to compete for "sacred ends" (i.e., "power",
"honor" and "prestige") (p. 148). In other words, the concept of social drama not only emphasizes the maintenance of culture and society through ritual, as does that of media event (Dayan & Katz, 1992), but also recognizes the performances of and interactions between social actors in this process and permits social change.
Applying this anthropological concept to examine disaster journalism, intense news coverage during disruptive events clearly can escalate a breach caused by a disaster into a sociopolitical crisis. In the crisis phase, not only is journalism a site to reflect political and cultural struggle, but journalists also become participants in this process, experimenting with nonconventional practices and formats to make sense of these political and cultural upheavals. As Bennett (1990) discovered in his model of press-elite indexing, the mainstream US media typically treat government officials as sources of daily news. This practice leads to "granting public officials a virtual news monopoly" and limiting "diversity in the politically volatile marketplace of ideas" (Bennett, 1990, p. 103).
However, when political elites display divided opinions or uncertainty, the media seizes the opportunity to adopt critical and independent perspectives. In this regard, non-routine disaster events create opportunities for news media to reverse existing power structures.
Similarly, Durham (2008) observed that television adopted a more populist stance in its coverage of Hurricane Katrina to represent the voice of the people and attract the
43 attention of the "absentee government" (p. 112). This populist stance refers to both the reprioritization of news sources so as to include more ordinary people (e.g., citizens, victims) in news coverage as eyewitnesses, and also to emotionalized news coverage—a tradition in tabloid journalism—to engage more viewership. Pantti and Wahl-Jorgensen
(2007) noted that public emotions of horror, empathy, grief, and anger are often articulated discursively in disaster coverage, serving as glue to create social solidarity in a devastated society and as a catalyst for social change. In this regard, emotive disaster coverage is a "unique secular ritual that both builds communities and enforces accountability" (Pantti & Wahl-Jorgensen, 2007, p. 22).
Due to intense media scrutiny, community political leaders, or "star groupers" to use the label of Turner (1981, p. 148), are forced to speed up their deliberation of redressive mechanisms to resolve the heated crisis. This media pressure is described as
"CNN Syndrome"—the way dramatic and nonstop media coverage has not only
"nationalized and politicized" otherwise local disasters but also "distorts objective consideration of state requests for disaster relief" (Platt, 1999, pp. 21‒22). Meanwhile, political leaders learn to create media spectacles to divert public attention or regain public trust. As Turner (1981) noted,
it is the star groupers who manipulate the machinery of redress, the law courts, the procedures of divination and ritual, and impose sanctions on those adjudged to have participated crisis, just as it may well be disgruntled or dissident star groupers who lead rebellions and provoke the initial breach. (p. 148)
Throughout the redress phase, new developments and political moves are interpreted and represented by journalists using "media templates" to create the continuity between the past and present (Kitzinger, 2000, p. 61), strategic framing to emphasize certain dimensions of the disaster (Entman, 1993), and culturally resonant narratives to highlight
44 shared social values (Kitch, 2003; Lule, 2001). Disaster news coverage has "real and enduring consequences for social life" (Ettema, 1990, p. 311). It helps create the reintegration of a traumatized community, or escalate their separation in either physical or symbolic ways. Consequently, disaster journalism resembles a conflictual ritual, a social drama, in the sense that through its coverage sociopolitical antagonisms are witnessed, the media-structure dynamic and conventional journalistic practices are redefined, and social reflexivity and critique are invited.
Using the concept of ritual to examine disaster journalism enables this research to investigate how journalists employ ritualistic practices to turn collective traumas into constructed media events, narrate them through established cultural codes, and transform them into a preferred and authoritative moral allegory (Zelizer, 1992). In this regard, disaster journalism functions as a "civil religion" that provides closure to the national grieving process, establishes a dominant collective memory, and creates a unified national ideology (Kitch, 2003, p. 213). On the other hand, this research demonstrates how disaster journalism is a conflictual ritual, a social drama (Turner, 1981), that not only renegotiates imbalanced power relationships among social actors but also the ideal of journalism itself.
Methods and Data Explained
Although some general rules guide journalism worldwide, news production and presentation remain distinctive cultural practices shaped by social milieu. Employing a methodological triangulation of in-depth interviews with 23 veteran journalists who covered Typhoon Morakot and textual analysis of related broadcast, newspaper, and online news coverage, this dissertation examines the production and representation of the
45 event in the Taiwanese media. In the social sciences, triangulation refers to the simultaneous application of several methods to achieve a research goal (Seale, 1999). As
Dingwall explained, "triangulation offers a way of explaining how accounts and actions in one setting are influenced or constrained by those in another" (cited in Seale, 1999, p.
474). Using triangulation thus not only allows researchers to learn from multiple types of empirical evidence, but also helps avoid the intrinsic bias that can result from using only one approach.
Specifically, this dissertation employs the following: 1) in-depth interviews with veteran journalists to gain insights into journalistic operations during Typhoon Morakot;
2) interpretive visual analysis to examine the visual construction of public emotions in the first week of broadcast news; 3) framing analysis to examine the narrative attribution of political responsibility in the first month of newspaper coverage; and 4) narrative analysis to examine news stories focused on aboriginal victims, published over four years on the 88news website. Together, these qualitative research methods help this research better interpret continuity and discontinuity between disaster news production and presentation. Furthermore, reading the news coverage from the immediate aftermath to four years after recovery enables this research to see the evolution of news in each phase of the disaster.
The data collection process in this research proceeded in four steps. After obtaining IRB approval7, the 23 informants (i.e., journalists who covered Typhoon
Morakot) were recruited using snowball sampling and interviewed one-on-one for approximately 1.5 hours each. Informant testimonies were recorded with permission,
7This project was approved by IRB as protocol 21352 on April 17, 2013. It was renewed once on March 10, 2014 and was closed on March 10, 2015.
46 transcribed verbatim, and translated from Chinese to English by the researcher. The transcriptions were analyzed using open coding to search for high-level concepts (i.e., thematic patterns) and dominant categories and sub-categories (Strauss & Corbin, 1998).
Second, the three top-rated news channels in 2009—TVBS, SET, and CTI—were identified following research by Lin (2009). Then, the first week of broadcast news on
Typhoon Morakot (August 7‒14) from these three channels was accessed and downloaded from the Democratic Progressive Party's news archive. The final sample included 138 hours of news programming from TVBS, 108 hours from SET, and 96 hours from CTI. Third, the first month of newspaper coverage on Typhoon Morakot
(August 7‒September 7) by four major Taiwanese newspapers—Liberty Times, Apple
Daily, United Daily, and The China Times—was collected from the archives in the
National Taiwan University Library and National Central Library. The sample ultimately consisted of 579 stories from Apple Daily, 1,098 from Liberty Times, 1,077 from United
Daily, and 1,065 from The China Times. Finally, online news coverage on Typhoon
Morakot was collected from the 88news website (http://www.88news.org/). The first news article on this website was posted on September 29, 2009 and the last on August 13,
2013. The final sample consisted of 1,396 news articles. Descriptions of how the methods were employed, how data were analyzed, and what the findings were are detailed in
Chapters 3, 4, 5, 6, to which we now turn.
47 CHAPTER 3 MAKING DISASTER NEWS: JOURNALISTS' REPORTING ASSIGNMENTS DURING TYPHOON MORAKOT
In Baton Rouge, for a while I can't see the camera lens because of the rain. It doesn't really matter, though; I know what I'm supposed to say: "I am powerless in the face of the storm." That's what reporters always say. "The storm's a reminder of how weak we humans really are." Right now, however, at this moment, I don't feel any of that. I feel invincible. The storm whips around me, flows through me. I am able to work, to stand, even when it's at its worst. The satellite dish is up, we are on the air, and we’re just about the only ones left. We have beaten the elements. We have won. (Cooper, 2006, p. 128)
When Typhoon Morakot struck Taiwan on August 8, 2009, hundreds of journalists rushed to the disaster sites to cover the large-scale destruction and incredible human loss. Coming primarily from four major newspapers and seven 24-hour television news channels, these correspondents represent a group of news organizations that vary widely in terms of audience (national vs. local), technology (print vs. electronic), and institutional culture. Significant individual differences also exist among them in terms of journalistic experience, gender, and work ethic. Nevertheless, facing a chaotic situation and fierce competition, these journalists produced very similar news content through all phases of the disaster.
While the coverage began with the standard warning of an impending typhoon and distribution of preparatory information, mainstream journalists quickly realized that
Morakot was anything but "normal". For the next twenty-six days, until bird flu replaced
Morakot as breaking news on September 3, the coverage collectively and consistently estimated causalities, documented flood levels, emphasized economic losses, investigated the government’s responsibility to lead recovery efforts, and presented human-interest stories of victims and first responders. Watching news across platforms presented the
48 impression that all these journalists worked in synergy (i.e., collective, team-oriented journalistic efforts).
Examination of the journalistic operations of mainstream reporters during
Typhoon Morakot is necessary to understand the highly formulaic media coverage they produced. Based on in-depth interviews with 20 veteran newspaper and broadcast journalists who covered Typhoon Morakot, this chapter aims to understand how behind- the-scenes forces (e.g., newsroom control, informal networking, and onsite technological options) influenced journalists’ front stage performances (i.e., news-making). Together these testimonies not only take us to the core of disaster news production in Taiwan, but also reveal how journalists see themselves and their profession.
Literature Review
News is often seen as the creation of individual journalists practicing their craft.
The impression of news production as an individual practice is further enhanced when readers see bylines in newspapers and magazines articles, and when the audiences hear the names and affiliations of reporters at the end of each newsreel. However, the development of "standardized news" (Bennett, Gressett, & Haltom, 1985, p. 50)—similar news content produced by seemly independent reporters across organizations—has challenged scholars to reconceptualize news-making as a collective process highly influenced by professional consensus, interpersonal networking, and "inter-organizational imitation" (Bennett, Gressett, & Haltom, 1985, p. 50). News media's gravitation toward a particular story with a shared focus becomes even more apparent in times of crisis. The image of "an excessive number of reporters (i.e., writers, anchors, etc.) aggressively pursu[ing] one notable story, actually smother[ing] the site with their grand presence, and
49 recurrently report[ing] on the story in a like fashion at a macro-level" (Matusitz & Breen,
2012, p. 900) has become a familiar visual in the news coverage of any modern disaster, from man-made tragedies (e.g., school shootings and terrorist attacks) to natural catastrophes (e.g., earthquakes and hurricanes).
This chapter is guided by two theoretical frameworks in attempting to understand this collective process of news making and its cultural and political functions: Zelizer's
(1993) journalists as interpretive communities and Cook's (1998) news media as a single institution. Building on this foundation, the discussion further situates this process in the context of disasters to explore the unique associated journalistic opportunities and challenges.
Theoretical Construct
Growing out of Stanley Fish's (1980) cultural studies oriented research, the concept of interpretive community contends that the meanings of texts are interpreted through readers' shared social experience—contradicting the traditional journalistic vision of a single objective truth (Hackett, 1984). Applying this concept to journalism, scholars have suggested that reporters form an "interpretive community" whose members are united by common interpretations of their social world (Berkowitz & TerKeurst, 1999;
Robinson & DeShano, 2011; Zelizer, 1993).
Zelizer (1993) argued that the profession of journalism is not only defined by professional ethics (e.g., education, training) but also by narrative practices (e.g., storytelling). In her analysis, Zelizer (1993) applied the notion of "double-time", namely
"two temporal positions" regarding an event (p. 224), to examine how journalists constitute themselves as an interpretive community. In the "local mode of interpretation"
50 (Zelizer, 1993, p. 224), journalists first position themselves as "the object of [news] accounts" (Zelizer, 1993, p. 224) through narratives such as "being there" and "on the spot" (Zelizer, 1993, p. 225). In the "durational mode of interpretation" (Zelizer, 1993, p.
225), journalists frame themselves as the subject of the news by emphasizing their association with and reflexive accounts of a historical event. This double time narration thus doubles the opportunities of journalists to act as interpretive authority of an event, first as an eyewitness and later as an amateur historian. The interpretive narratives journalists developed are then "transported into collective memory, where they are used as models for understanding the authoritative role of journalist[s] and the journalistic community" (Zelizer, 1992, p. 189). Consequently, journalism becomes a "discursive construct" which is characterized by the way "journalists talk about themselves and how they generate shared meaning of reality" (Mourao, 2014, p. 3).
Cook (1998) provided another angle to examine the journalistic consensus from a sociological perspective. Seeing news media as a single institution, Cook first suggested that journalists are guided by a key set of practices in gathering and structuring news information, such as deferring to expertise and official sources, presenting both sides of the story, providing hard evidence, and writing in an impersonal manner. These practices, similar to what Tuchman (1972) termed the "strategic ritual of objectivity" are vital for journalists to "respond to the risks imposed by deadlines, libel suits and superiors' reprimands" (p. 662). However, when the practices of news production are highly routinized and have little relevance to the end product, news becomes texts that are defined by established journalistic rules and routines, rather than being a representation of "the characteristics of events" (Cook, 1998, p. 73).
51 Secondly, Cook focused on the "mutual reliance" between journalists across space and over time (Cook, 1998, p. 80). Not only do individual journalists perform similar journalistic routines, they also consult each other when facing ambiguous situations to determine the newsworthiness and meanings of events. Counter intuitively, competition between journalists does not push them to pursue exclusive scoops, but to establish a
"risk averse consensus" (Cook, 1998, p. 78). Using Sigal's phrase, "This group judgment...imparts a measure of certainty to the uncertain world of the newsman" (cited in Cook, 1998, p. 80). Furthermore, journalists familiarize themselves with previous reporting angles to ensure they adopt an appropriate approach in covering a subject. In short, uncertainty about news reinforces dependency between news organizations and continuity in news narratives and interpretive frameworks. However, the danger of journalistic consistency is the absence of diversity in viewpoints and coverage across various media outlets.
Finally, the link between news media and politics was discussed. As a political communication scholar, Cook addresses the use of news making in policymaking. Given that journalists overwhelmingly favor official sources to add legitimacy to news, key political actors learn to feed their preferred agendas, issues, and facts to news organizations thorough strategic public relations and publicity efforts. This "structural bias" (Mourao, 2014, p. 4) enables politicians to exert control over news information to accomplish political and policy goals. Consequently, rather than playing the traditional role of the fourth estate, that of supervising the government’s exercise of its political power, the news media may become an "unwitting adjunct" (Cook, 1998, p. 165) to that very power. Recent studies on the monolithic, consensual, and patriotic coverage of the
52 9/11 terrorist attacks further underscored media complicity in engaging in a centralized media ritual and reproducing nationalist ideology (Borden, 2005).
Journalism in Times of Disaster
The theoretical lenses of journalists as interpretive communities and news media as an institution explain the similarity in news narratives and journalistic practices across media modalities. Nevertheless, recent scholarship on mediated disasters has recognized a more fluid press-government relationship as well as an alternative narrative that is more provocative than objective.
As Bennett (1990) discovered in the model of press-elite indexing, mainstream
US media typically treat government officials as sources of daily news. This practice leads to "granting public officials a virtual news monopoly" and limiting "diversity in the politically volatile marketplace of ideas" (p. 103). However, when political elites have divided opinions or display uncertainty, the media will seize the opportunity to adopt critical and independent perspectives. In this regard, unexpected disaster events create opportunities for news media to reverse existing power structures. Similarly, Durham
(2008) identified a de-centralized and conflictual relationship between news media and government in his research on news coverage of Hurricane Katrina. In his analysis, since officials were unable to manage the information flow and publicity as effectively as normal, television news adopted a more populist stance in its coverage of Hurricane
Katrina to represent the voice of the people and attract the attention of the "absentee government" (p. 112).
Izard and Perkins (2012) observed that many journalists abandoned the rules of dispassionate reporting and displayed their emotions in their coverage of Hurricanes
53 Katrina and Rita. Journalists' initial shock and sorrow quickly transformed into outrage and was candidly conveyed in their reportage. The clearest example occurred when CNN correspondent Anderson Cooper interrupted Senator Mary Landrieu as she thanked national leaders for their extraordinary disaster relief efforts. He said,
I'm sorry for interrupting, Senator...for the last four days, I've been seeing dead bodies in the streets here in Mississippi, and to listen to politicians thanking each other and complimenting each other, you know, I've got to tell you, there are a lot of people here who are very upset and very angry and very frustrated...Because literally there was a body on the streets of this town yesterday being eaten by rats because this woman had been laying in the street for 48 hours. And there's not enough facilities to take her up. Do you get the anger that is out here? (Cited in Izard & Perkins, 2012, p. 6)
Cooper's raw outrage is rare in news coverage since journalists normally "outsource emotional labor by describing the emotions of others" (Wahl-Jorgensen, 2013, p. 129).
Consequently, as Overholser (2006) concluded, in contrast to traditional news coverage in which emotional expression is carefully censored or expressed through sources, news workers "showed their hearts" in covering Hurricane Katrina, and moreover this is a typical journalistic response in times of disaster.
Method
So far this chapter has drawn on literature that portrays journalists as members of a political institution and as an interpretive community that faces unique opportunities and challenges in times of crisis. To better understand the production process of natural disaster news in Taiwan, the researcher conducted 20 in-depth interviews with mainstream journalists with first-hand experience of covering either the 921 Earthquake or Typhoon Morakot.
The interview subjects were recruited via snowball sampling, which refers to "the process of accumulation as each located subject suggests other subjects" (Babbie, 2004, p.
54 184). This method is appropriate when the researcher wishes to collect data on a target population whose members are difficult to locate. In this case, the difficulty was the result of the passage of time (i.e., five years). The first three interviewees (Informants N2,
N5, and T1) were friends of the researcher before the project was initiated. They were interviewed first and provided contact information of colleagues and supervisors who shared similar experiences in disaster reporting. The final group comprised 10 newspaper and 10 broadcast journalists. Informant numbers (N1-10 for newspaper; T1-10 for television) are used throughout the text to maintain anonymity. While all informants covered Typhoon Morakot in 2009, approximately two thirds of them covered both natural disasters (i.e., the 921 Earthquake and Typhoon Morakot) during their careers.
The majority of this group (16 out of 20) were still working in the news industry at the time of their interviews—albeit as managers (e.g., chief director, assistant manager, and deputy coordinator) rather than beat reporters. Meanwhile, four of them left the news industry to pursue careers in academia (Informants N1, N10 and T10) and the documentary film industry (Informant T8). On average, the group had 14.7 years of journalistic experience, with a range from 6 years to 22 years. Additionally, despite great efforts, only 5 female journalists (Informants N10, T1, T5, T7, and T10) were recruited— two of whom (Informants N10 and T10) were no longer working as journalists.
Each one-on-one interview was conducted face-to-face between August 2013 and
August 2014 and lasted approximately 1.5 hours. This process can be seen as an "in- depth contextual analysis of ordinary experiences" (Buzzanell, 1995, p. 344), which seeks to understand the production process of disaster news and the meaning journalists make from their reporting assignments. A semi-structured questionnaire was used to "focus [the]
55 discussion, yet also allowed flexibility to explore new ideas as they emerged" (Berkowitz
& TerKeurst, 1999, p. 130). These partially structured interviews were guided by such primary questions as: "What is the news production process during natural disasters, and how does it differ from everyday procedures?", and "Where and how do you obtain your news information?" As with most interview protocols, the questions asked of the journalists evolved over time. After the initial five interviews, the researcher started to observe a repetitive pattern in informants' responses. For example, they perceive that disaster reporting continues to be a male domain. This gendered division in Taiwanese news media was not anticipated by the researcher nor a focus in the beginning. However, observing this pattern in the first round of interviews, the researcher modified the protocol for the subsequent interviews. The final version of the protocol and the detailed demographic information can be found in Appendix A and Appendix C, respectively.
In a qualitative interview project, "saturation" is the most important concept for a researcher to determine when to stop conducting interviews (Guest, Bunce, & Johnson,
2006). The concept of saturation refers to "the point at which no new information or themes are observed in the data" (Guest, Bunce, & Johnson, 2006, p. 59). In this research, the threshold of saturation was achieved around the twelfth interview. Even though each informant shared distinctive personal experience in covering Typhoon Morakot, all shared a similar description of how to produce a news story, how to deal with the extended control from the newsroom, and how to compete yet cooperate with their colleagues. At this point, the researcher was almost able to predict the responses to any given question. For good measure, eight more interviews were conducted to confirm a pattern had been established. All interviews were recorded with the permission of the
56 informants, then transcribed verbatim and translated from Chinese to English by the researcher.
The resulting texts were analyzed using "open coding," a technique that searches texts for high-level concepts (i.e., thematic patterns) and dominant categories and sub- categories (Strauss & Corbin, 1998). The open-coding data analysis comprised several stages. The first step was to closely read all transcripts to gain a feel for what disaster reporting is about (i.e., the essence of the raw data). After this initial reading, conceptualization was performed through "line-by-line analysis" to break the raw data into discrete incidents able to be searched for high-level concepts (i.e., repetitive thematic patterns). A deeper axial coding was further conducted to identify the relationships between the thematic patterns. Finally, the central thematic patterns were integrated and categorized through selective coding (Strauss & Corbin, 1998). Applying open coding to interpret informants' disaster reporting experiences identified common patterns between newspaper and broadcast journalists, such as the (false) acceleration of operational autonomy, socialization of interpretive framework, practice of pack journalism, and a gender boundary in disaster reporting. These thematic patterns will be discussed in the next section to understand how mainstream journalists collectively built a shared interpretation to represent a key public event in Taiwan—Typhoon Morakot.
Racing the Typhoon with the Boys
The journalists interviewed described their news-gathering routines in times of disaster, the socialization that shapes the interpretive frameworks they use to represent natural disasters, and the masculine norms and ideology that dominate disaster journalism.
The analysis revealed that institutional, interpersonal and individual (gender) forces are
57 all crucial in the process of disaster news production. This section will discuss the journalistic practice, journalistic language and gendered norms associated with the coverage of Typhoon Morakot, drawing upon journalists’ words and experiences to illustrate and demystify the process of news production.
The (False) Acceleration of Onsite Operational Autonomy
In Taiwan, the news-gathering routine for newspapers starts the night before the presses roll as journalists inform their supervisors of scheduled events (e.g., press conferences, protests, consumer events, academic seminars) in their newsbeat for the following day. In the morning, they check in with their sources for developments and await the official assignment from their supervisors (determined in the morning meeting).
Around noon, the reporters reconfirm with their supervisors regarding the news stories they are working on, and at this point the supervisor may cancel a story or ask that two stories be combined. By 6 pm, the list of the next day's news items is finalized, and by 11 pm the journalists have written the stories and uploaded final versions via the online system. Their supervisors then check the content, and the editorial department verifies facts, decides headlines, and designs page layout. Normally, each page consists of 5 to 6 news stories plus 2 to 3 photos, and the maximum length of each news story for all four newspapers is 500 words.
For broadcast journalists, their daily routine starts with reading newspapers.
According to a reporter, "without a doubt, the newspaper sets the news agenda in Taiwan.
As a broadcast journalist, most of the time our job is just to visualize those stories covered in the newspapers" (Informant T1). After the morning managerial meeting, the journalists receive concrete assignments from their supervisors and go into the field to get
58 footage and sound bites from appropriate informants. Broadcast journalists face two daily deadlines: the first at around 11 am for the noon newscast, and the second at 6 pm for the evening news. A regular television news story is about 90 seconds. Broadcast journalists also provide live reports to cover major ongoing events.
Both newspaper and broadcast journalists have their own assigned newsbeat; however, in response to a major disaster they are reassigned to cover the breaking news.
According to a senior reporter,
When Typhoon Morakot struck southern Taiwan, journalists in central Taiwan were asked to rush to the disaster sites immediately because of their geographical proximity. Soon after, we [journalists located in Taipei, northern Taiwan] were also parachuted to the sites to support them. (Informant no. N4)
Journalists prioritize crises and collective trauma by inviting audiences to monitor developments with around-the-clock coverage. After all, as Izard and Perkins suggested
(2012), "It's not cynical to note that journalism thrives on bad news. One definition of news...is that which is not normal" (p. 1). News media respond to unexpected disasters by abandoning regular coverage to give the disasters significant space or airtime. The sudden increase in demand for disaster information challenges established journalistic practices, and many informants mentioned the "acceleration of operational autonomy"
(Informants N3, N4, T1, T3, T5, and T8). As the only persons on site, the journalists served as the "discoverer" and "initiator" of news stories (Informant T1). In other words, journalists took from their supervisors and editorial departments the power to decide what is newsworthy. However, reading their testimonies more closely, it is clear that even in times of disaster, news production practices remain highly controlled by institutional forces in several ways.
59 First, since most journalists covering Typhoon Morakot were parachuted into the disaster sites, they had no previous local knowledge or connections and thus relied heavily on "official sources" (e.g., local governments, police departments, fire departments and hospitals) to comprehend the disaster (Informants N3, N4, N6, T1, and
T3). This is consistent with Sood, Stockdale and Rogers' (1987) observation that journalists tend to rely on an "information czar", a person with official status and relevant expertise, to convey the most credible and authoritative information regarding disasters and interpret its complexities (p. 35). Quarantelli's (1981) research also found that the
"command post perspective"—i.e., the perspective of officials—dominates the media representation of emergencies (p. 59). Consequently, the journalistic preference for using a centralized information source reflects the fixed and asymmetrical relationship between the media and sociopolitical authorities (i.e., the government and other authorities).
Representing Typhoon Morakot from the command post standpoint, newspaper and broadcast journalists thus collectively created a one-dimensional disaster story focused on disputes between politicians as well as their political responsibilities. Mainstream journalists largely overlooked the other characters involved in the tragedy, whether civic volunteer groups or severely affected aboriginal tribes, because they were not considered legitimate sources. This political emphasis and its implications will be discussed in
Chapter 5.
Other sources were notably absent from mainstream news coverage of Typhoon
Morakot. This exclusion was not based on their lacking credibility (i.e. they are not included in the regular news beat), but rather on their established cultural authority.
Illustrative of this absence is the lack of critical voices in mainstream coverage of the
60 Tzu-Chi Buddhist Foundation. Given Tzu-Chi’s many decades of contributions to both local and international disaster relief efforts, it has established a reputation in Taiwanese society as a well-respected and prestigious humanitarian organization. Fearing this foundation's social impact, most mainstream media consciously remained silent when activists and alternative journalists questioned Tzu-Chi's disaster housing project for aboriginal victims as "undisguised colonization" in a 21st century context (Pnn, 2010, ¶
12). As a broadcast journalist explained,
I don't know if there is a mutual agreement between our management team and Tzu-Chi. The only thing I know is that you should never represent this foundation from a negative angle...There is no written policy, but a smart journalist learns this rule from his/her reporting experiences. (Informant no. T1)
While newsroom socialization was a big reason for this self-censorship, other journalists mentioned Tzu-Chi directly intervening to control its media image. For instance, immediately after The China Times ran a full-page story on the controversies associated with the disaster housing project, the executive editor received a phone call from Tzu-Chi voicing concerns. In response to strong pressure, The China Times then ran another full- page story emphasizing Tzu-Chi's humanitarian spirit to provide "balance" (Informants
N1 and N5). In short, institutional sources set the news agenda through the inclusion and exclusion of news items. They can either feed journalists vital information, or use their social connections and influence to block a story from publication.
Furthermore, the onsite newsgathering process of broadcast journalists is highly controlled and constrained by both technological and organizational forces. Given that television news stresses visuals and immediacy, live reporting becomes the best way to address these two emphases (Informant N7). A live report requires that journalists be on constant stand-by in a specific place that is both visually dramatic, thus satiating the
61 spectator’s gaze, and accessible to the Satellite News Gathering (SNG) car, thus facilitating signal-transmission. As a reporter opined, "When I was assigned to do a live report, I dared not go too far away since it might not allow for a stable transmission signal... Even if you got the best image, it would mean nothing if you couldn't send it out"
(Informant T9). Broadcast journalists were also in close contact with their home offices and instructed to cover developing stories from specific angles. "My supervisor monitored the newscasts from rival television channels all day long. If he saw something he liked, he called me immediately to order a similar news story" said one reporter
(Informant T1). This acknowledgment not only illustrates the low operational autonomy enjoyed by on-site broadcast journalists, but also discredits their statements, reported above, regarding the newsroom power shift in times of disasters.
Compared to their broadcast colleagues, newspaper journalists are relatively autonomous doing disaster reporting. With only one daily deadline, they spend most of their time exploring the affected areas in hope of sniffing out scoops by their news nose.
However, not all print journalists enjoy this acceleration of operational autonomy, and this holds especially for less-experienced ones. For example, one reporter said, "Typhoon
Morakot was my first-ever parachute assignment. I was clueless and wasted so much time on unnecessary practices. I wish my supervisor had been more hands on and provided me with more information about the events" (Informant N4). In other cases resentment resulted from insufficient instructions from the home office to help them navigate the situation (Informants N1 and N2). Other senior informants mentioned internal tensions commonly seen in disaster reporting, mostly generated by rivalry between parachute and local journalists and inter-departmental politics (Informants N3, N7, and N9). As one
62 informant noted, "I was clearly there to help. But my colleague based in southern Taiwan was very defensive and unwilling to share his local connections with me. It was as if I was trespassing on his news beat" (Informant N9). This testimony shows that although disasters are supposed to unite collectives, journalists still fought one another to maintain ownership boundaries. Another informant recalled that they phoned the editorial department seeking assistance in typing up a story via dictation when the situation was so chaotic that there was no technology to send their article back. However, this request to
"take a 350 word dictation" was denied on the basis that it was the journalist's job to write the news, not the editor's (Informant N6). In the words of a senior newspaper journalist who suffered a heart attack after 34 days spent covering Typhoon Morakot with little rest,
"Disasters bring you greater operational autonomy. However, less intervention also means less assistance. It is just the way it is" (Informant N3).
Even though the increased demand for disaster information gives both broadcast and newspaper journalists different levels of operational autonomy, their dependence on institutional sources and technology as well as the extension of newsroom control work together to constrain this liberty. As the following section shows, the socialization of disaster news language and the practice of pack journalism further limit journalists’ options in disaster reporting and lead to highly formulaic, unoriginal Typhoon Morakot coverage across news platforms.
The Socialization of Disaster News Language
Many informants described the process of learning how to write the news regarding a natural disaster. With time and experience, most reporters learn the rules and routines of disaster news language, which helps them reduce "the variability of the raw
63 material of news" and "routinize the unexpected" in disasters (Tuchman, 1973, p. 129).
"The event is different each time, but the interpretive framework you use to represent each disaster is similar", said a newspaper journalist (Informant N6). Disaster coverage thus can be seen as a "novelty without change" (Cook, 1998, p. 81) through which journalists transform an inexplicable natural catastrophe into a comprehensible social event.
The interpretive framework journalists employed had a different focus at each stage of a natural disaster. When Typhoon Morakot first broke, journalists focused on
"factual information," such as the flood level, ravaged landscape, and number of fatalities; they did so to evaluate the seriousness of the unexpected catastrophe (Informants N4, N5,
N7, N6, T1 and T7). Both newspaper and broadcast journalists used textual and visual analogies to convey this factional information. For example, while a newspaper reporter coined the term "Hurricane Katrina in Taiwan" to help readers comprehend the devastation caused by Typhoon Morakot though juxtaposition with another disaster, broadcast journalists inserted footage of Formula One races into their newscasts in a visual metaphor to describe the wind speed. Beyond mere statistics, this factual information quantified and personified Typhoon Morakot as a destructive villain or unruly monster that threatened human civilization, a perpetual struggle between man and nature. Following this first framework, "human interest stories," which emphasize valor and resilience, were used to envision the victory of humanity, whereas "the attribution of responsibility" framework was used to explain why humanity occasionally lost the battle.
Tales of heroism and sacrifice were paired with inexplicable horrors in disaster reporting (Informants N4, N5, N7, N6, T1 and T7). Stories of heroic behaviors—e.g.,
64 soldiers and fire fighters who gave their lives to save fellow citizens, and students who volunteered in rescue efforts—attracted great media attention during Typhoon Morakot.
As one broadcast journalist said,
We are a PG-13 news channel that our audience can watch with their families during dinnertime. Rather than repeating images of chaos, we want to focus more on uplifting stories. We want to show that there is still a bright side in times of darkness. (Informant T3)
Hero stories thus reassured the audience that the social order will be maintained and the tragedy handled with courage and optimism. Additionally, journalists singled out individual victims whose stories seemed particularly tragic, including their funerals and memorial services, to commemorate the common loss. Similar to Kitch and Hume's
(2008) study on news telling of tragic events in American context, these "obituary-style" news stories often underscored the virtues of the deceased (e.g., a good father, loving mother, and devoted daughter) (p. 19). Thus they functioned as civic lessons not only reflecting who we are, but also instructing the public who we want to become.
While human-interest stories provide closure to the national grieving process and assign cultural meaning to natural disasters, the attribution-of-responsibility framework creates an outlet for media to voice public anger and collective dissent. In disaster journalism, identifying a culprit on whom to assign blame is just as important as finding a hero to boost morale (Pantti, Wahl-Jorgensen & Cottle, 2012). As noted by several informants, the "blame-game" became a media approach to transform a natural disaster into a social disaster and explain it as a result of human activity and/or negligence
(Informants N4, N5, N7, N6, T1 and T7). In his research on British television news coverage of the Kurdish refugee crisis in 1991, Shaw (1996) argued that "graphic portrayal of human tragedy and the victims' belief in Western leaders was skillfully
65 juxtaposed with the responsibility and the diplomatic evasions of those same leaders to create a political challenge which it became impossible for them to ignore" (p. 88). In a similar fashion, President Ma Ying-Jeou's slow response to the typhoon victims' suffering was amplified by mainstream media to frame him as the major culprit in the tragedy and pressure him to provide a satisfactory solution. These media narratives of blame and accountability often have political consequences. A month after the typhoon, Premier Liu
Chao-Shiuan resigned in a gesture intended to assume full responsibility for the government's disastrous crisis management.
Even though journalists use repetitive frameworks to cover natural disasters, there are also times they are caught in ambiguous and chaotic situations that require them to
"improvise" an interpretive framework for an unfolding event (Cook, 1998, p. 80). When asked how they interpret ambiguous developments, most informants mentioned their colleagues as their best "sources" and "sounding board" (Informants N4, N5, N7, N6, T1 and T7). According to a newspaper journalist, "we talked to each other [colleagues] to check if we shared a similar understanding of the situation... By doing so, we ensure that we are making the right judgment and no one gets a big scoop" (Informant N4). This collaborative process is known as "pack journalism" (Crouse, 1973; Matusitz & Breen,
2007, 2012) and sees reporters create unanimity in their news coverage and develop their membership of this "interpretive community" (Zelizer, 1993).
Timothy Crouse coined the term "pack journalism". In his book The Boys on the
Bus, Crouse (1973) revealed that during the 1972 presidential election in the United
States, a pack of journalists closely followed the political candidates to cover their campaigns. Sharing the same bus, the journalists ate, drank, gossiped and compared notes
66 with each other for months. This resulted in homogenous news content across news platforms, where even the most critical journalists "cannot completely escape the pressures of the pack" (Crouse, 1973, p. 15). Other scholars indentified similar journalistic practices in the modern news industry: a massive number of journalists pursue one unfolding story, cite the same sources, and produce similar news coverage which often follows the angle set by those with the most journalistic experience or working for the most prestigious news media (Matusitz & Breen, 2007, 2012). This consensus-building process is further enhanced by new technology (e.g., smart phone, instant message app) and via social media (e.g., Twitter, Facebook) where journalists' informal networking becomes visible to the public (Mourao, 2014).
The most harmful and unethical consequence of this standardized news content is the absence of independent reporting (Matusitz & Breen, 2007). Illustrative examples of this loss of independence in mainstream coverage of Typhoon Morakot included overestimated fatality numbers and unconfirmed rumors repeatedly published by different media. Additionally, four major newspapers collectively dropped the Morakot story on September 3 to place the next breaking news story—bird flu—on their front pages, as if the problems caused by the typhoon had all been resolved. When poor living situations of aboriginal victims in the typhoon’s aftermath demanded investigation, most mainstream media sided with Tzu-Chi and ignored the story. Only a small group of alternative journalists from 88news, who remained "journalistic outsiders" and had not adopted the perspective of the mainstream interpretive community (Berkowitz &
TerKeurst, 1999, p. 129) broke the silence and gave the story the media attention they felt it deserved. The alternative Morakot story told by 88news will be discussed in Chapter 6.
67 Using shared interpretive frameworks of factual information, human interest stories, and attribution of responsibility, mainstream journalists not only developed a collective representation of Typhoon Morakot, but also united as an interpretive community (Zelizer, 1993). However, this community is not egalitarian and remains male dominated. The next section will discuss different opportunities and challenges male and female journalists faced during their Morakot assignment and how their varying self- concepts led to different degrees of journalistic authority.
The Gender Boundary in Disaster Reporting
While the concept of pack journalism developed by Crouse (1973) has attracted great attention in media scholarship, less discussed is the "irresistible combination of camaraderie, hardship, and luxury" cultivated among reporters (p. 371), an exclusive male fraternity specialized in political communication. The term "boys" in the title of
Crouse’s book thus not only captures the physical reporting situation, but also the gendered notions associated with campaign coverage (Mourao, 2014). Politics is not the only subdomain in journalism deemed a male specialty. Studies have found that gender plays a role in beat divisions, according to which hard news (e.g., political, foreign, financial, etc.) is considered "masculine" whereas soft news (e.g., culture, health, family, human interest, etc.) is "feminine" (Tsui & Lee, 2012; Van Zoonen, 1998; Voinche,
Davie & Dinu, 2010). Furthermore, masculine newsbeats are often treated as more significant than feminine newsbeats in terms of their social impact and source credibility.
Therefore, the constant assigning of female reporters to cover "softer" and less substantive stories (Danilewicz & Desmond, 2007) impedes their chances of establishing journalistic authority (Steiner, 1998). To build up their professional identity, women
68 journalists often downplay their gender identity to demonstrate that they can do journalism just like men.
Despite numbers of female reporters in Taiwan increasing from 37.7% of the total in 1994 to 42.5% in 2004 (Lo, 2004), men continue to dominate the Taiwanese news industry. Statistics also show that Taiwanese female reporters are more likely than their male counterparts to quit journalism jobs within five years (Lo, 2004). This male domination extends to disaster reporting and is reflected in this study’s interview pool, which contained only five female journalists, four of whom worked for television and two of whom no longer work as journalists. As a senior reporter noted, "Even though the supervisor will ask for volunteers, we all know that unmarried male journalists are preferred for this kind of mission [disaster reporting]" (Informant T3). As this reveals, an unspoken masculinist ideology continues to dominate the Taiwanese news industry. First, given the unexpected and dangerous nature of disasters, male journalists are seen as more capable of handling the job than their female counterparts. Second, their single status (i.e., unmarried) means they are more flexible and cheaper to compensate in the event of an accident (i.e., the news company does not have to support his family). A close reading of informants' testimonies explains why disaster reporting in Taiwan continues to be designated as a male arena, with masculine characteristics extolled as representing true journalism and reinforcement of gender stereotypes.
Journalists used the analogy of war to describe their experiences covering
Typhoon Morakot. As one informant recalled,
I was assigned to replace a colleague who had been parachuted to Kaohsiung for a week to cover the typhoon. Before I took off, I asked him what I should prepare? He didn't say much but asked if I had seen any war movies recently. I said yes and
69 asked why. Even now I still clearly remember his answer: "because what you are going to see is even worse than those images." (Informant T9)
Others remembered seeing "body parts floating on the river" (Informants T3 and T6) and described "the smell of dead bodies as something horrifically unique and unforgettable"
(Informant N9). These accounts are not surprising. As Kitch and Hume (2008) noted,
"war [is] the reference most often used to describe the devastation resulting from… disasters" (p. 11). Together these candid visual and olfactory memories create a parallel between natural disaster sites and war zones. If covering a natural disaster is similar to a military mission, it seems more logical and "safe" (Informants N9 and T4) to ensure the
"soldiers" (Informants N4, T3, and T9) sent to the frontline are male.
Indeed, personal safety was the major justification mentioned in interviews for male journalists being better candidates for disaster reporting. According to a newspaper reporter,
There was no electricity or water, and I had to sleep in a half collapsed house with two male colleagues for two nights. This is the kind of environment we had to deal with during Morakot. If you had to dispatch someone to cover the story, you were definitely going to send a male correspondent. It has nothing to do with gender discrimination. It is about personal safety. (Informant N9)
This seemingly logical statement is clearly patriarchal. The hidden message is that female journalists are seen first as women, and hence as vulnerable to violence and harassment and in need of constant male companionship to ensure their safety. Moreover, even if fully capable of self-protection, female reporters are perceived as less flexible because of physiological constraints and gender expectations. As several male informants asked:
"What if they are on their periods and they have to use the toilet frequently?" (Informants
N4 and T3) and "What about their children? The reporting assignment could go on for months" (Informant T8). These inquiries not only belittle the female body as problematic
70 and inferior but also reinforence the traditional gendered division of household labor. The personal safety narrative thus strips female journalists of their professional identity and their opportunity to participate in a key news event.
Male and female journalists also employed different language to express their psychological conditions when covering Typhoon Morakot. Most male informants described themselves as "task-oriented" and striving to achieve journalistic excellence
(Informants N3, N6, N7, T3, and T9). "At that moment, the only thought in my mind was to be the first to hop on a military helicopter so I could get a big scoop from the ravaged mountain village," said one broadcast reporter. "You forget what fear is, you just want to fulfill your responsibility" (Informant T4). This "no-fear" mentality was shared by other male interviewees who depicted the Morakot experience as "pedagogical" and
"empowering" (Informants N4, N7, T3 and T6). As a senior correspondent claimed,
"when you are assigned to cover a disaster, if you don't feel an adrenaline rush, you are probably not going to be a good journalist in the long run" (Informant N7). In the eyes of male reporters, disaster reporting is a rite of passage through which they develop a profound understating of life, death, and humanity—vital elements in journalism. The reward for passing the test is greater journalistic authority.
In contrast, female journalists are more willing to admit that disaster reporting has taken a toll on them. Many described feeling "overwhelmed" and "shocked" by the sight of numerous corpses (Informants T5 and T10) and mentioned the development of post- traumatic stress disorder symptoms, such as "fear of the dark," "insomnia" and "loss of appetite" (Informants T1 and T5). Notably, female informants were surprised to hear that their male colleagues remained psychologically intact despite the emotionally taxing
71 nature of such assignments. They interpreted the "no-fear" narrative as a rhetorical maneuver through which male journalists maintained their "masculine pride" (Informants
T5 and T 10). However, when asked to present a counter example to the masculine domination of disaster reporting, two recounted the exact same story—a story that only reinforced the stereotypes of female journalists as fragile.
A female anchor from one major TV network was assigned to cover a plane crash in 1998...Her team arrived at night. It was really dark and the area was not marked off by police tape, so she didn't notice she was standing on body parts. Once she realized, she had mental breakdown and rushed back to the SNG car. To her, the whole thing was not only scary but also extremely disrespectful to the deceased. She couldn't continue with the live report anymore...Of course her cameraman was very upset because he had to cover her job...For the next ten years, this female anchor became a laughing stock and example of how not to do in disaster reporting. (Informant no. T5)
Overall, the testimonies of female reporters suggest their desire to challenge the masculine culture of disaster journalism and the discrimination they face. However, when they reach for an illustrative narrative from their repertoire, they pull out a story that appears to further that very discrimination. Yet, this openness to their personal emotions facing trauma can add a humanistic perspective to disaster coverage by integrating emotional and psychological unease into the news treatment, an application of "intimate journalism" (Harrington, 1997). Besides adding perspective, this openness can also strengthen advocacy for a system of safety insurance and psychological counseling for professional media workers, which is vital but missing in Taiwan.
It is important for journalists to acknowledge their emotions when covering monumental tragedies. Their feelings of outrage and frustration often transform into compassionate news coverage that attempts to speak on behalf of victims. However, being dominated by the masculine mentality, "[t]he culture of journalism has been to
72 ignore this [emotional casualty], to deny this, to treat it with alcohol and bravado and a certain amount of contempt for the journalist who admits a problem" said psychiatrist
Frank Ochberd (cited in Haynes, 2006, ¶ 28). Although journalists are expected to be
"cool under fire" (Haynes, 2006, ¶ 26) to preserve objectivity, accuracy, and fairness in their news writing, passionate yet critical disaster coverage might have the power to invite the audience to engage with the event and take actions for social change.
Conclusion
Struck by the similarity of mainstream media coverage of Typhoon Morakot, the researcher interviewed veteran journalists who covered this tragic event to understand how institutional, organizational, and individual forces shaped the process of news production. Evidence shows that despite the sudden increase in demand for disaster information that challenged established journalistic norms, reporters’ operations were still heavily constrained by official sources, on-site technological options, and the extension of newsroom control. They also employed standard interpretive frameworks to represent different stages of the typhoon and thus assigned both cultural and political meaning to the natural disaster. This shared interpretation was further enhanced by the practice of pack journalism, through which journalists confirmed both the authenticity of the
Morakot story and their membership of this interpretive community.
Furthermore, male journalists were considered better candidates to cover Typhoon
Morakot for both personal and professional reasons. They are deemed capable of simultaneously protecting themselves and remaining emotionally intact under a chaotic situation. On the other hand, the female body and female sensibility were seen as obstacles to journalistic professionalism, especially in times of disasters. In this way,
73 when journalists employ "double time narration" (Zelizer, 1993) to construct and reconstruct the meaning of this key event, it is always the masculine perspective and the authority of male reporters being recognized and perpetuated.
Finally, it is worth noting that given most interviewees in this research were parachute journalists, they represent an interpretive community whose national and outsider perspectives may differ from local understanding of the disaster. Nevertheless, their testimonies provided a solid foundation for the next two chapters, which focus on newspaper and television coverage of Typhoon Morakot, respectively.
74 CHAPTER 4 FEELING THE DISASTER: AN EXAMINATION OF EMOTIVE TELEVISION REPORTAGE FOLLOWING TYPHOON MORAKOT
What we see above all in the news on our TV screens are the faces of the rulers, experts and journalists who comment on the images, who tell us what they show and what we should make of them. If horror is banalized, it is not because we see too many images of it. We do not see too many suffering bodies on the screen. But we do see too many nameless bodies, too many bodies incapable of returning the gaze that we direct at them, too many bodies that are an object of speech without themselves having a chance to speak. (Ranciere, 2009, p. 96)
"You are witnessing the Golden General Hotel being swept away by the Jhihben
River", CTI anchor Lu Show-Feng told viewers. "The nation is stunned by the image, which looks straight out of a horror movie". These shocking visuals, quickly relayed by every television news channel, revealed the destructive power of Typhoon Morakot.
Given the associated devastation and misery, Typhoon Morakot was already a dramatic and emotional event. Nevertheless, the various news channels showed something far from unmediated reality; rather, they showed a series of carefully edited segments that employed journalistic conventions to ratchet up the drama and emotion, such as aerial shots of swollen landscapes, close shots of teary eyes, animated charts of precipitation volume, and fast-paced narrations by on-the-scene reporters.
Using interpretive visual analysis to examine more than 300 hours of news programs produced by TVBS, SET, and CTI in the week immediately after Typhoon
Morakot, this chapter identifies a variety of approaches, such as commercial interruption, onsite eyewitnesses, dramatization, and cinematic vignette, that broadcast reporters used to tell emotionally powerful stories. While many media critics reduce such media construction to evidence of "weepy journalism" (Pantti, 2005) and "therapy news"
(Mayes, 2000), which exploits public emotions (including grief, horror, pride, and
75 compassion) to boost ratings, this chapter explores the cultural function of emotive disaster coverage. In fact, such coverage united a traumatized society and allowed journalists to establish their cultural authority through emotional storytelling .
The Expression of Emotion in Disaster News
Emotions have long been seen as the antithesis of objectivity—the dominant value in Western news reporting. As the "primary sense-making vehicle" in modern society (Wahl-Jorgensen, 2013, p. 131), journalism is expected to be the embodiment of reason and rationality, serving to inform the audience and encourage political deliberation, not to elicit emotional responses from the public (Franklin, 1997; Kovach & Rosenstiel,
2007). Thus, emotion-charged reporting styles are often denounced as "sensationalism",
"entertainment", and tabloid journalism (Mayes, 2000, p. 30). Nevertheless, emotion has become an integral component of journalism, reflecting "a larger social trend that is shifting public discourse away from matters of the common good, and towards a preoccupation with the intimate and affective" (Pantti & Wahl-Jorgensen, 2007, p. 4).
The tendency of weaving emotional words into news copy is especially prominent in the context of unexpected tragedy, an area loaded with "tears and trauma" (Kitch, 2009, p.
29), and enforced by particular broadcast genres, such as 24-hour news coverage and talk shows (Aslama & Pantti, 2006). Thus, television reportage of disasters provides a unique opportunity to examine the social function, both integrative and disruptive, of emotive news discourse.
The Integrative Function of Emotive Disaster News
It is well documented that emotive disaster coverage creates a "community of feeling" in which individually experienced feelings are transformed into collectively
76 indulged "emotional energy" with political implications (Berezin, 2002, p. 39). Examples are evident in the news coverage of the assassination and funeral of controversial right- wing Dutch politician, Pim Fortuyn. By emphasizing public mourning, Dutch reporters depoliticized a radical politician and his violent death and transformed it into an integrative national tragedy to construct a "sense of togetherness" in that multicultural society (Pantti & Weiten, 2005, p. 311).
As Linenthal (2001) noted, "Some events threaten bedrock convictions so severely that we engage them only by softening the story, reducing the sheer horror of an event...by grasping for comforting and reassuring story lines" (p. 41). Such transformation and closure is typically achieved through repetitive, archetypical, and culturally resonant news narratives told by journalists, so that the audience can comprehend an otherwise inexplicable tragedy (Bird & Dardenne, 1997; Kitch, 2009).
Thus, the story of September 11 progressed quickly from a shocking event initially loaded with "vulnerability and fear" to a profound moral tale celebrating "heroism and patriotic pride"—the qualities most highly esteemed by Americans (Kitch, 2003, p. 213).
Likewise, a local incident involving nine miners rescued after being trapped in the
Quecreek coal mine in Pennsylvania was elevated in the news account to a national miracle and "a parable of brave working-class men and the 'first responders' who saved them" (Kitch, 2009, p. 32).
Clearly, disaster news narratives of this kind, which follow a specific cultural script, not only represent suffering and provide a platform for victims' testimonials, but further guide the audience to develop certain emotional responses and "suggest the feelings that are suitable [...regarding the] given event" (Pantti, Wahl-Jorgensen & Cottle,
77 2012, p. 75). Therefore, by framing the 2011 Haiti Earthquake as a humanitarian project, with the core message "the fate of the dark world [is] in the hands of a benevolent white one" (Balaji, 2011, p. 50), the US media successfully prompted American citizens to show their generosity. In contrast, in covering the Fukushima Earthquake, the US media, perplexed by "Japanese stoicism" (Roan, 2011, ¶ 4), failed to produce emotionally gripping stories. The tone of US coverage explains the slowness and limited scale of donations from the US (Dorell & Grossman, 2011, ¶ 28).
Acknowledging the integrative function of emotive disaster coverage, Pantti,
Wahl-Jorgensen, and Cottle (2012) further encourage journalists to reflect on their own emotions to engage larger audiences. This does not suggest that news workers need to be excessively emotional, but rather that they should combine an informative, fact-based reporting style with their deeply felt raw emotions (Ward, 2010). Realization of this goal requires following two rules. First, rather than becoming a gimmick to boost ratings, the display of journalists' emotions must be authentic, naturally timed, modestly proportioned, and of suitable duration. Overuse of emotions only causes "compassion fatigue" among viewers (Ward, 2010, ¶ 13). More importantly, "journalists should not use emotions to make themselves the center of the story and to engage in self-congratulation" (Ward,
2010, ¶ 16). Consequently, by representing the disaster using an "emotionally engaged" approach, journalists have a better chance of reconnecting with their estranged audience and "generat[ing] a new moral imaginary when bearing witness to human suffering"
(Pantti, Wahl-Jorgensen & Cottle, 2012, p. 73).
78 The Disruptive Function of Emotive Disaster News
Nevertheless, other scholars contend that "disruptive events" (Katz & Liebes,
2007, p. 157)—whether natural or man-made—are prioritized in the news hierarchy simply to maintain viewership. Fierce competition among media organizations and innovations in broadcast technology further amplifies this news preference. In his article
"Why We Love Disaster Stories", Andrew O'Connell (2014) contemplated the attraction of tragedies and asked two questions: "Are we simply fascinated by others' misfortune?
The worse their luck, the greater our thrill? Or is it a need for catharsis—for acknowledgment of, and release from, all our repressed anxieties about the things that could harm us?" (¶ 3). O'Connell's queries echo a critical view in journalism studies that contends disasters are often dramatized as "spectacles" while their distant victims are portrayed in a way that reconfirms the status of viewers as "safe spectator[s]" (Pantti,
Wahl-Jorgensen & Cottle, 2012, p. 77).
Focusing on television coverage of Hurricane Katrina, Bates and Ahmed (2007) coined the term disaster pornography to highlight similarities between disaster news and pornography. According to their analysis, visuals of suffering and the scale of death were heightened in Katrina stories to "appeal to the thanatotic interest" among news consumers
(Bates & Ahmed, 2007, p. 191), much as female bodies are objectified and hypersexualized in pornography to invoke viewers' "prurient" desires (Bates & Ahmed,
2007, p. 190). As such, although many people were shown in Katrina coverage, they were portrayed as mere "objects" to satisfy the audiences' "voyeuristic desires" and strengthen the distinction between the powerful and safe home viewers who were able to assist and the subordinate and endangered victims who needed help (Bates & Ahmed,
79 2007, p. 190). Furthermore, given the lack of "additional literary, artistic, political, or scientific value" in news accounts of Katrina (Bates & Ahmed, 2007, p. 190), it was difficult for viewers to place these "superficial" visuals in a larger social context and be motivated to call for social justice for sufferers (Bates & Ahmed, 2007, p. 190).
Similarly, Liebes (1998) analyzed Israel television's live coverage of suicide bombings targeting buses in 1996 and proposed the concept of disaster marathon to describe a new broadcast genre in the making—a genre in which a disaster becomes a
"non-stop" and "open-ended" media event, whose story-telling energy derives from dramatic visuals and the collective emotions arising from conflict, anxiety, and disagreement (p. 71). The rise of this new broadcasting mode has important implications.
First, in the case of disasters with human perpetrators, the non-scripted nature of disaster marathons makes them akin to "co-productions" between broadcasters and perpetrators, with the former unwittingly publicizing the anti-establishment agenda of the latter (Katz
& Liebes, 2007, p. 164). Second, because of their involvement and suffering, "victims are granted expert status" (Mayes, 2000, p. 31) to the extent that their opinions dictate government response to the problem. As Liebes (1998) concluded, "the 'open-studio' disaster marathon...maximizes the structural flaws of the dominant new electronic press, plays into the hands of the ruthless violators of democratic decision making and gives voice to the least 'considered opinion' of the distraught representatives of the public" (p.
83). As such, informative news reporting, which serves to facilitate true democracy, has been replaced by a televised open forum that is built on and "incites collective hysteria"
(Liebes, 1998, p. 83) for economic purposes through a "disaster time-out" (Liebes, 1998, p. 76).
80 Method
The aforementioned literature illustrates the role of emotions in disaster news, including their sociopolitical consequences. To better understand how and what kind of emotions were expressed and constructed in television coverage of Typhoon Morakot, this chapter employs Wojcieszak's (2009) "interpretive framework for visual analyses" to examine the relevant textual, visual, and audio strategies (p. 459). The research goal here is not to "codify or quantify the coverage" (Wojcieszak, 2009, p. 462), but to inductively identify the recurring image/text/audio relationships in Morakot stories, relationships that constitute and routinize the formats for emotional expression.
The research data used in this chapter were gathered from three top-rated
Taiwanese television channels in 2009—TVBS, SET, and CTI—identified by Lin's (2009) research that used a "minute-by-minute rating" competition of Taiwanese news broadcasts (p. 79). Once the news channels were selected, relevant coverage was accessed from the Democratic Progressive Party's news archives, with the study sample comprising a week's worth of Typhoon Morakot coverage (August 7‒Auguest 14). The final sample included 138 hours of news programming from TVBS, 108 hours from SET, and 96 hours from CTI. Analyzing the three channels and relevant news stories during this time frame, this chapter aims to avoid any idiosyncrasies related to specific stations while securitizing the general and evolving pattern of public emotions captured by and/or created in the broadcast news on Typhoon Morakot. The text was analyzed using
Wojcieszak's (2009) visual analysis framework, a technique developed to examine interconnectedness between image, text, and audio messages within individual newscasts.
81 Despite the moving image being the signature feature that differentiates television from other media, most research on broadcast news focuses on either "the analysis of information content, or [on] codes of professional ideology shaping information transmission" (Griffin, 1992, p. 123), highlighting a lack of approaches that study the visual structure of television news. Wojcieszak (2009) attempts to answer the call with her conceptual framework, which identifies "the interplay between three modes of information transmission in the broadcast news" (p. 459), provides a tool to break television reportage on Typhoon Morakot into empirically operationalizable dimensions.
In her analysis, the composition of each newscast can be divided into "moving footage
(iconic message)", "on-screen textual elements (linguistic messages)", and "voiceover
(audio messages)" (p. 459). Wojcieszak (2009) further identified different ways these three messages function as "entities" (p. 466) to create the dominant interpretation of each news segment: (1) polysemy reduction, in which linguistic and audio messages work together to reduce "multiple interpretation[s]" embedded in news images (p. 462),
(2) contextualization and acquiring meaning, in which reporters' verbal narratives and on- screen text create meaning from ambiguous, irrelevant, and discontinuous visual images,
(3) reinforcement, in which images are used to evoke "preexisting interpretive schema" (p.
469) and thus guide audience interpretations, (4) contradiction, in which visual images convey hidden messages excluded from or contradictory to the audio and linguistic messages. This kind of discordant presentation "might result [...] in audience distractions"
(p. 473) and decrease the credibility of the news information, and (5) slogano-symbolism, in which "linguistic slogans are incorporated into visual symbols to create a coherent and recurring entity" (p. 474), serving to elicit a specific audience reception. For example,
82 during news coverage of the September 11 terrorist attacks, an animated American flag (a visual symbol) and terms like "freedom" and "patriotism" (linguistic slogans) (p. 474) were constantly juxtapositioned in newscasts as slogano-symbolism to prompt a sense of
Americanness and solidarity.
Applying Wojcieszak's (2009) conceptual framework to examine coverage of
Typhoon Morakot produced by three television channels, it is clear that images, on- screen text, and reporter voiceovers all play crucial roles in conveying and constructing public emotions. The next section discusses how journalists employ different visual, textual, and audio strategies to elicit specific emotional responses from the audience and establish their journalistic authority in times of disaster.
Findings
As Fry (2003) noted, "TV news creates drama in the way language is employed; the way subjects, images, camera shots, and computer graphics are chosen; and the way sequences are edited together" (p. 6). Focusing on various production techniques employed by three chosen television channels, this section explores how public emotions of horror, grief, anger, pride, and compassion were witnessed, dramatized, and manufactured in televised Morakot stories.
Switching to "Disaster Marathon" Mode
After Typhoon Morakot struck Taiwan on August 7, it quickly dominated the airwaves and became the only story playing on all news channels. This phenomenon supported the observation of Liebes (1998) that when a major disaster news story breaks, television "finds itself charged with the decision of whether or not to switch to a marathon mode, what to show, and when and how to return to the normal schedule" (p.
83 74). The Taiwanese news media began to operate as though a national "state of emergency" had been declared (Liebes, 1998, p. 75), as evidenced by their abandoning scheduled programming and interrupting designated commercial spots. Commercials are the primary source of profit for news channels and networks cater to advertisers, so this behavior of neglecting the source of their primary income was highly unusual.
Starting on August 8, all three news channels began employing split windows during commercial breaks to keep the Morakot stories going. Each one-hour news program in Taiwan typically has three commercial breaks, each lasting about five to six minutes. As shown in Figure 4.1, TVBS used a bigger frame to broadcast a scheduled commercial and a smaller frame to show dramatic typhoon footage in which two first responders and one victim were immersed in waist-deep water. Notably, this unspecified image was used to represent the general devastation caused by Typhoon Morakot rather than any specific incident or disaster site. This interpretation was further enhanced by the message at the top of the screen: "Morakot Sweeps Through". The bottom of the screen was occupied by a bar displaying updates of weather information and typhoon damage.
TVBS added to the sense of drama with a lightning-themed visual effect in the background.
Similar advertisement interventions, visual presentations, and linguistic messages could be found in both CTI and SET reporting. While CTI created a computer-generated graphic to illustrate the trajectory of the typhoon in the smaller frame, SET used nondescript footage to highlight its destructive power. These visuals were accompanied by messages that read "Southern Taiwan Pummeled by Heavy Rain" and displayed against a background of animated lightening plus weather system movement. As one
84 broadcast reporter explained, "the L frame [split window] is an approach to show our audience that this event is so important to us that it outweighs the importance of commercials" (S. Pai, personal communication, August 7, 2014). In other words, the marathon-like, non-stop reporting style was less about ensuring audiences had the latest information than demonstrating network commitment to covering the news.
Learning from experience that their commercials would likely be interrupted in times of disasters, some advertisers even produced special edition commercials that creatively wove together commercial plugs and typhoon preparedness information. For example, a TV commercial for PXMart8 (Figure 4.2), a local supermarket chain, involved a company spokesperson climbing a ladder in pouring rain to change the store banner from "PXMart" to "PX Typhoon Emergency Center". The commercial ended with a textual reminder to viewers that PXMart always offers the lowest prices and can "help you prepare when a typhoon threatens". Similarly, 7-Eleven's TV commercial9 (Figure
4.3), which take the form of simplistic animations, changes from black-and-white to color on the appearance of the company mascot, whose sadness transforms to joy on emerging from a 7-Eleven store—his act of consumption complete. 7-Eleven positioned itself as the "rainbow within the typhoon".
However, juxtaposing commercials with disaster news footage was potentially perplexing and confusing for viewers. Not only were commercials presented in a larger, flashier form than the disaster coverage, and accompanied by sound, but their mundane commercial content potentially degraded the seriousness of the event. Using Wojcieszak's
8 PXMart's special edition commercial for Typhoon Morakot can be retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U4QczP4CQAc 9 7-Eleven's special edition commercial for Typhoon Morakot can be retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p61KdfYIawE
85 (2009) conceptual framework, this juxtaposition created a "contradiction between parts of the triad" (p. 471, emphasis original), namely the iconic, linguistic, and audio messages, and thus invited alternative viewer interpretations. Rather than prompting them to take actions to help typhoon victims, the juxtaposition reassured viewers safe at home that continuing their normal lives during the tragedy was a "legitimate" response, as the commercials encouraged them to continue engaging in everyday consumerism. This juxtaposition can also be seen as a business strategy through which television channels maintain viewership. As discussed in the research on television news watching by Lin
(2009), Taiwanese audiences tend to switch channels during commercial breaks and then not switch back. Continuous typhoon footage thus was a way for networks to stem the loss of viewers, especially at a time of high interest in the news.
If non-stop television coverage marked by split screen commercial interjections provided the prelude to Typhoon Morakot, the live broadcast of the collapse of the
Golden General Hotel was the first incident to bring the horror of the typhoon into every living room. On August 9, at 11:38 am, the six-story Golden General Hotel in Taidong
County collapsed into the Jhihben River after surging floodwaters eroded its foundations.
Although there were no injuries since hotel guests had been evacuated two days earlier, television news interrupted other programming to relay the shocking images live.
Live Broadcasting the Horror
Given its visual nature and ability to create immediacy, live reporting is integral to television news. Innovations in media technology further make it "possible for even a small market news operation to go 'live from the scene'" (Tuggle & Huffman, 1999, p.
492). A true live report must meet three criteria: "spatial proximity", "temporal
86 proximity", and "broadcast proximity" (Huxford, 2009, p. 659). The reporter must be physically onsite as the event unfolds and be transmitting the report to a news show in real time. This definition explains why live reporting promotes journalistic authority: it implies the "act of eyewitnessing" (Zelizer, 2007, p. 408) through which reporters assure factualness. However, as Huxford (2009) argued, live reports today are typically merely
"semi-live" (p. 661). Television news often employs visual and narrative codes to
"facilitate the illusion of live coverage and reporters' proximity to breaking events"
(Huxford, 2009, p. 657, emphasis original). This tendency was evident in all three networks' live coverage of the Golden General Hotel incident.
At 11:52 am, CTI TV was the first channel to announce the shocking news. The reportage began with split windows in which a standard shot of anchor Hung Yi-Qing occupied a small frame in the top left of the screen, while an image of the hotel lying in the river occupied the majority of the frame—comprising two-thirds of the screen.
Beneath both frames was a message reading: "Unable to Withstand the Swollen Waters, the Golden General Hotel Has Collapsed", together with the words "Breaking News".
After reading the scripted introduction to the story, the anchor announced that CTI reporter Wu Jia-Hui was onsite with the latest information for viewers. Following the announcement, the split windows were replaced with a full frame image showing a close- up of the Golden General Hotel leaning prior to its collapse. With the camera slowly panning from bottom to top, viewers could sense the building’s instability. Subsequent images of the swelling Jhiben River, which continued to erode the foundation of the tilting hotel, further articulated the gravity of the situation.
87 Although the visuals were self-explanatory, the reporter's voice-over confirmed to viewers understand that a mudslide had pushed the Golden General Hotel to the riverside and caused the final collapse. The narration stated:
At 7 am this morning, the Golden General Hotel was leaning at 20 degrees. By 9 am, it was leaning at 30 degrees. At 11:38 am, the entire building toppled. The way it fell into the water was surreal… like building blocks collapsing. The collapse created a huge splash and terrified the crowds who had gathered to watch. You can hear their screams in the news clip. (Wu, 2009)
Accompanying this narration was a series of dramatic visuals, progressing from close-up details to wide shots that included the surrounding area: a close shot of the hotel as it slowly toppled over, a medium shot of the splash, another close shot of the broken building lying in the river, a ground level shot panning quickly from right to left to capture a group of unspecified people fleeing the scene, and finally another wide shot of the tilting hotel. Similar to Fry's (2003) analysis, this "fast-paced editing sequence" (p. 79) produced by CTI not only "impart[s] an enormous amount of visual information, [but] also create[s] a sense of over-whelming urgency" (p. 80).
This two-minute clip was clearly an edited presentation of what had happened to the Golden General Hotel rather than live coverage. Additionally, without the presence of the reporter in front of the screen, it was hard to tell if the reporter was truly reporting from the scene or just adding a voice-over to the footage. Nevertheless, using techniques, such as a small "Live" caption on top left, text specifying the reporter's location, and verbal descriptions of the progression of the event and public emotions, the clip lent authenticity to the journalistic account, and more importantly, gave the viewer a sense that the event was unfolding and deserved urgent emotional attention.
88 Unlike CTI, which captured footage of the hotel buckling from the opposite riverbank, TVBS managed to cross the river and record the event from a different camera angle. This "spatial proximity" (Huxford, 2009, p. 659) was highlighted as a selling point of TVBS's coverage, released at 12:59 pm, and became a visual illustration of journalistic dedication. The newscast began with an image of several people running from the scene.
Adding to the chaotic atmosphere were their screams, the sound of rushing water, and a close-up of the ruins of the hotel lying in the river. As the event unfolded, it was narrated by a voice-over, saying:
This image was taken by our videographer. When he heard the strange screeching sounds, he knew that the hotel was about to topple over. He immediately urged hotel guests to leave, yet remained himself to capture the magnitude of the event. (Yang, 2009)
This verbal explanation gave new meaning to the earlier images of chaos: the newsman fulfilled the role of a true journalist by risking his life to tell the story, while simultaneously fulfilling his role as citizen by warning others to flee. The news image then moved to the frontal view of the collapsing hotel, which was described as resembling "a bomb exploding in the water" with a splash that "was five stories high"
(Yang, 2009) to enhance the tension and drama. When the visual returned to the studio, the anchor repeated the message: "our reporters risked life and limb to obtain this footage".
Although the reporters were not physically visible, their testimonies dominated the clip, creating a strong sense of their having been physically present and borne witness to events. The "journalist as eyewitness" became the focal point of this piece, emphasized in voice-overs and on-screen texts that read: "The cameraman filmed on the run to capture the moment" (Yang, 2009). As Zelizer (1990) claimed, "By promoting their
89 proximity [to the event], journalists can both claim authorship and establish authority for their stories" (p. 38). Here, both authorship and authority are reinforced visually and orally. The addition to this piece of the heroic element (i.e., ushering others to safety) further elevated the journalists' standing from cultural authority to moral authority.
Consequently, that which is witnessed is not important, and the act of eye witnessing becomes what really matters (Zelizer, 2007, p. 424).
In SET's live coverage, broadcast at 3:56 pm, the first image shown on the screen was that of an onsite correspondent. Standing at the scene wearing a pink rain coat and looking directly into the camera, the female reporter's manner and attire conveyed calm, reassurance, and professionalism, and directly contrasted with the concerned and bewildered crowd in the background. As the camera slowly zoomed in, curious onlookers holding binoculars could be seen in the crowd. At this point, the reporter began to narrate:
Behind me you can see a group of "tourists", some carry digital cameras, others seem to be waiting for something to happen. Why are they so curious? What are they here to see? The answer is the Golden General Hotel, which fell over this morning at 11:38 am after its foundations were cut away by the Jhihben River. Now, let's take a look at the shocking camera footage. (Wang, 2009)
The visual of unspecified people was then replaced with the earlier recorded image of the hotel toppling into the river and the ensuing splash. The reporter remained silent as the footage was shown, letting viewers clearly hear the chatter and screams of the on-site witnesses to the event. Mixing the past with the present created a deceptive "temporal proximity" (Huxford, 2009, p. 659), as if the event were happening in real time and witnessed by the crowd shown earlier.
However, the most important implication of this clip was the use of laypeople as a rhetorical device to establish journalistic authority. First, by emphasizing how the
90 onlookers were cordoned off from the scene by police tape, the onsite reporter not only implied her neutrality and detachment from the crowd, but also distinguished her expert credentials through her proximity to the hotel ruins, which became "a visual [symbol] of journalistic expertise" (Huxford, 2007, p. 669). Second, by patronizingly labeling the crowd as tourists, their gaze became "voyeuristic", "one-dimensional", and
"preconceived" (Fry, 2003, p. 75), transforming the event into a spectacle, while the journalistic gaze became associated with the lofty goal of delivering the unmediated truth.
The journalists thus underscored their position as trustworthy communicators of knowledge, as opposed to amateur onlookers.
Using the strong sense of presence and urgency inherent in live reporting, the three news channels invited audiences to both understand and "bear witness to the horror" of the Golden General Hotel's dramatic toppling (Pantti & Wahl-Jorgensen, 2007, p. 13).
However, by emphasizing their proximity to the unfolding scene, reporters simultaneously established their position as expert story tellers, assuming the role of eyewitness. This authority later became a cultural license for them to dramatize and sensationalize the event.
Dramatizing "Floods of Tears"
Culture shapes the experience and expression of emotion (Pantti, 2005). In
Taiwan, a Confucian society, public expression of emotions is restrained by the doctrine of the mean (i.e., 中庸之道), with overt articulation of personal feelings deemed inappropriate. However, in times of crisis, the power of raw emotion pushes people to breach cultural convention. Journalists normally do not have such overt public emotions to work with. So great was the contrast with everyday news stories that the public
91 expression of personal grief—weeping, crying, wailing—became a news story itself
(Kitch, 2000).
It is no exaggeration to say that television news on Typhoon Morakot was flooded by tears, especially as more and more casualties were discovered and reported from various disaster sites. As Pantti and Whal-Jorgensen (2007) suggested, the discourse of grief is a mechanism to help viewers overcome the initial senseless horror and build empathy for victims. In televised Morakot stories grief was typically characterized by three visual elements: shocking contextual scenes, groups collectively mourning, and grieving individuals. The contextual scenes were dominated by various images. For instance, aerial shots showed the ravaged landscape, the trajectory of the mudslides, and the floodwaters. Visuals of helicopters also became a staple as most roads were impassible, making helicopters the key rescue mission vehicle. A SET reporter went even further to demonstrate the dire road conditions, sitting in the shovel of an excavator as the camera panned over debris (Figure 4.4). These contextual visuals not only served an informational purpose, by using the immersive depiction of the landscape they also encouraged emotional engagement. The second and third classes of visuals were inseparable. In most cases, the visuals began with a wide angle shot, capturing emotional displays of groups of people, mostly in deep mourning, then zoomed in to highlight individual emotions. These images of grief utilized specific visual cues to enhance the emotional narrative. For example, many scenes included comforting gestures, such as hand holding, hugging, and praying, as well as images of children, who were the most vulnerable victims.
92 Most literature documents a gender division in emotional displays; male mourners are portrayed as emotionally in control and restrained, while female mourners are presented as prone to emotional outbursts (Lupton, 1998; Pantti, 2005). Morakot coverage broke from this gender divide and incorporated many male mourners in dramatic emotional states. A TVBS segment on August 10 showed a rescued male victim sobbing on camera and saying that ten members of his family were gone (Gu, 2009). His emotional state seemed to drain him of all energy, such that he had to sit to be interviewed. Although the reporter and onsite volunteers were shown briefly, the victim, or specifically his tear-stained face, occupied the visual center of the clip. Unlike contextual images, the clip was defined by the stark absence of any voiceover and a prominent victim-led monologue. The combination of the words and tears of real-life victims lend more authenticity and magnitude to the disaster than any journalistic coverage (Langer, 1998).
An intimate, two-minute shot highlighting the man's reddened eyes, tears, and sullen look forced the viewer to take in and process his intense personal grief (Figure 4.5).
This kind of emotional display is deemed newsworthy, because it functions as a "social
[indicator] of the plight of a group, whether the group is parents with incurably ill children, wives of soldiers missing in action, or families made homeless by a natural disaster" (Tuchman, 1978, p. 123). As such, individual grief is an essential marker used to represent collective tragedy. Taking in this grief, viewers seek means to process and overcome the emotions, means that journalists seemingly do not provide. The viewing experience thus becomes uncomfortable, almost voyeuristic. In this context, the donation
93 hotline number that the television networks displayed on screen seemed to suggest an action viewers could take to combat what had become collective grief.
Despite the strong link between tears and grief, tears can also indicate other emotions such as anger. A recurrent and steadily growing theme in televised Morakot stories saw tears of anger interjected into the steady stream of tears of grief. An illustrative example is found in a TVBS news clip shown on August 10, in which a typhoon victim broke through security lines to beg President Ma Ying-Jeou to search for his father, believed lost in a mudslide. For two minutes, viewers watched the scene, listening in on the exchange between Mr. Lee and the president. The inclusion of subtitles, colored yellow and red to represent the two parties, further drew viewers into their interaction. Once through the security blockade, Mr. Lee said to the president, "I am a big supporter of yours. I voted for you. Why is it so difficult to see you?" The exchange then immediately took on an unpleasant taste as President Ma replied, "Am I not here now?"
The exchange continued in this spirit, with Mr. Lee pleading with a non-responsive president. Instead of clearly offering support and compassion, President Ma's verbal and nonverbal responses showed little concern for the victims, whether those standing before him or still on the mountain ("Pleading with the President", 2009).
The power of this segment came from both the verbal exchange and the visuals.
First, listening in on the conversation between the victim and the president, viewers might be reminded of traditional Chinese stories concerning interaction between citizens and government officials. Lacking any means to converse directly with authorities, the traditional convention for subjects in Imperial China was to engage in displays of emotion in an effort to cause a passing official's sedan chair to stop, allowing them to air
94 whatever injustice they had suffered (i.e., 攔轎喊冤). The interaction between Mr. Lee and President Ma was a modern reenactment of this tradition, in which the powerless citizen dropped to his knees, wailing to ensure his appeal was finally heard. The visual construction of the clip further enhanced the victim's accusation. The entire story was shot from a high canted angle to achieve a full bird's-eye perspective. As Tuchman (1978) contended, the bird's eye perspective is rarely used with human figures, because it gives the impression of "distortion" and brings into question the factualness of the scene (p.
112). However, this dramatic visual framing invited the audience to take a critical look, analyzing the scene from above (Figure 4.6). The one person viewers were meant to critique was President Ma Ying-Jeou, who was easily identified as the only face clearly visible in the crowded scene, standing at the center of both the crowd and the televised image. The visibility of President Ma contrasted with the source of the action in the scene, namely the victim Mr. Lee. The viewer was shown a visual of Mr. Lee's face for only three seconds of the two-minute segment, yet his highly emotional, almost erratic, state was evidenced in his voice and exaggerated gestures. As such, the faceless victim became a representation of the moral outrage of the community.
A third type of emotional narrative, focusing on heroic acts and pride, is also linked to tears. This is evidenced in a story covering a helicopter rescue mission that resulted in a crash on August 11. The three news channels quickly adopted the hero narrative to describe and pay tribute to the three deceased crewmembers. When their bodies were located on August 13, SET produced three back-to-back segments, lasting just five minutes, that highlighted their heroism from the perspectives of the nation, family, and colleagues. In the first clip, viewers saw the Minister of the Interior, Liao
95 Liou-yi wearing a black armband, a sign of personal loss and grief, to show his respects to the three crewmembers, thus elevating their individual deaths to a collective loss.
Minister Liao also commented briefly to journalists that "their contributions will always be remembered and appreciated", confirming the hero status of the deceased The second clip introduced the credentials of the three crewmembers before switching to a scene of family members mourning. Juxtaposing their past achievements with the current grief only enhanced the sense of communal loss. The voiceover at the end mentioned that despite the great sorrow, the pilot's 17-year-old daughter felt proud of her father who had died doing something he felt was his mission in life. The third segment took viewers to a funeral home to witness the memorial service. Two colleagues provided personal accounts that gave faces to the men behind the heroic deeds. For example, one member shared that the co-pilot had turned down a much better offer from a commercial airline in order to save lives (Wu & Huang, 2009).
In contrast to the coverage of grief and anger, in which the victim functions as the primary narrator, in the hero narrative, journalists take back the power of narration. They not only give partial ownership of the heroism to the audience (Kitch, 2009), but also assign cultural meaning to a senseless natural disaster. The bravery and sacrifice of the three crewmembers were thus interpreted as evidence of the true Taiwanese spirit through which the nation could recover. Although certain repetitive visual cues conveyed a sense of loss, these segments contained few truly dramatic images, such as close-up shots of people wailing hysterically. Instead there were visuals of community leaders, such as
Minister Liao, struggling to restrain tears of collective grief. These relatively understated visuals supported the powerful spoken narratives.
96 The dramatic presentation of emotion in television news, as discussed in this section, has long been seen as evidence of tabloidization—a process in which news material with a political or economic focus has been replaced by human interest stories with entertainment and sensational value (Mayes, 2000; Spark, 1998). Nevertheless, an emotive televisual event, such as the Morakot story, also serves a political function of holding authorities accountable for a tragedy as well as being a unifying function stabilizing the "imagined bereaved community" of the nation that shares common feelings of pain and loss as a result of news consumption (Linenthal, 2002, p. 13). This unifying function is further enhanced by the cinematic vignettes produced by networks to elicit compassion and solidarity.
Manufactured Compassion and Hope
News is about facts. Various narrative and visual conventions are employed to avoid the impression of manipulation and interpretation and create an aura of neutrality and objectivity (Tuchman, 1978). For example, as Tuchman (1978) noted, while fast and slow motion are frequently used in filmmaking to suggest humor or tenderness, respectively, news reporting eschews such time manipulation techniques because they impede the sense of factualness associated with the genuine temporal rhythm (p. 110).
News reporting also relies heavily on quoting others to avoid the appearance of bias. In short, news has been constructed as an untainted lens on our world. This is why SET's production of a cinematic vignette dedicated to the victims and rescue workers, a departure from fact-driven news that is detailed below, was attention-grabbing.
At 9:11 am on August 14, SET broadcast a 1 minute 33 second vignette between two regular news segments to pay tribute to first responders and typhoon victims.
97 Although not of high production value, the vignette was very cinematic, incorporating slow motion and a musical score. The vignette began with first responders donning their gear. Through the ensuing images viewers then followed the responders on a rescue mission. The flood itself became a character as aerial shots conveyed to viewers its immensity and close-ups the intensity of the rushing waters. The vignette concluded with the responders bringing individuals to safety. The musical score was a popular song by
Taiwanese artist Judy Ongg, known for her warm and soothing voice. The song was titled
"Prayer", consistent with the theme of hope and happiness. However, the lyrics were not the sole narrative of the vignette, with subtitles and an information scroll providing additional messages. Although one would assume the subtitles to reflect the lyrics being sung, in fact they introduced a poetic narrative with a theme of heroism (see Appendix B).
In contrast, the information scroll departed from the other three messages in the vignette by providing a descriptive (i.e., non-artistic) message establishing context.
The vignette stood out from the news stories that bookended it both in style and content. While the information scroll shown on the right of the screen functioned as the descriptive element anchoring the vignette as the body of news, it was relegated to an area of the screen that received little attention and so became little more than an afterthought. The slow motion visuals, positive lyrics, and poetic subtitles all built an emotional, not factual, narrative. Presenting the flood in slow motion gave viewers the impression that the water was unsettling, yet tamable. One especially notable scene began with an eye-level view of the water surface, positioning viewers as though about to be engulfed, then first responders entered the scene from a worm's eye perspective (Figure
4.7). This visual demonstrated Mother Nature's dominance and superiority, but
98 simultaneously expressed optimism in the ability of humanity to overcome the destructiveness thrown at it by Mother Nature. The hope of a brighter tomorrow was reinforced through the final scene, which included the following subtitles:
And you cast your fears aside / And you know you can survive / So when you feel like hope is gone / Hold on, there will be tomorrow / In time, you will find the way / That a hero lies in you. ("A tribute to the heros", 2009)
Together the visual and linguistic messages not only represented heroism, but also called for it in the viewer. Through mass action, Mother Nature can be overcome. Rather than promoting individualistic heroism, the faceless first responders in the vignette worked to symbolize collective action and solidarity (Figure 4.8).
Rather than being a further exploitation of emotions in the name of sensational journalism, this vignette was more likely to reflect the journalists' emotional engagement with the disaster. According to Kitch (2009), "Reporters' and editors' willing and consistent participation in such ritual situates them within culture, rather than outside it, and confirms that they too are citizens who react to terrible events with feeling and sometimes outrage" (p. 34). As objective as they may claim to be, journalists are, in the end, like their viewers, just people. In particular, broadcast journalists are in the unique position of appearing more personable because of their visual presence, yet have fewer opportunities to express that personality—there are no editorials in Taiwanese broadcast news. If citizens are strongly affected by a disaster, in terms of economic losses and psychological trauma, so too are journalists. This vignette thus became an outlet for journalists to participate in the grieving ritual, and to shoulder their responsibility as cultural leaders to create an uplifting message to inspire society to continue normal activities.
99 Conclusion
The televisual medium is particularly keyed in to the emotional narratives of disaster. Examining the first week of broadcast news coverage of Typhoon Morakot, it is clear that public emotions of horror, grief, anger, pride, and compassion received special media attention. Nevertheless, these emotions were not only represented, but also constructed through various television news techniques to enhance their intensity.
Switching to marathon mode by interrupting regular TV commercials was the first move television networks made to signal the arrival of a disaster. Live broadcasting from the site and eyewitnessing were then emphasized to communicate the sense of unfolding horror and request the urgent emotional attention of viewers. Subsequently, tears of typhoon victims became a marker to symbolize different emotions, including grief, anger, and pride. While tears of grief and anger were represented by dramatic visual shots and through victims' testimonies, reporters took back the power of narration to articulate tears of pride, or hero narratives. News networks went even further to produce cinematic vignettes with inspiring messages to elicit compassion and solidarity.
Together these televisual techniques not only constructed an emotionally powerful disaster story, but also helped journalists establish their cultural authority as emotionally engaged storytellers.
Such marathon-like, emotive coverage had certain implications. While it created the integral outlet for both viewers and journalists to reflect their emotions and united society in shock at the unfolding disaster, it also forced raw emotions upon viewers without providing any means to digest these powerful feelings. Viewers were typically left with two options, either combat their devastated emotional state through
100 consumerism, as suggested by continuous TV commercials, or make donations to the typhoon victims, as suggested by the on-screen hotline being promoted by the networks.
Whatever their choice, the future living situation of the victims and the social injustice created by the typhoon were not their concern.
101 CHAPTER 5 WHEN A NATURAL DISASTER TURNS INTO A POLITICAL STORM: HOW NEWSPAPERS FRAME POLITICAL RESPONSIBILITIES DURING AND AFTERMATH TYPHOON MORAKOT
In the end, the real power of a hurricane isn't found in its wind speed. It's in what it leaves behind—the lives lost, the lives changed, the memories obliterated in a gust of wind. Anyone who does hurricane reporting for any length of time knows all too well that standing in the aftermath of a storm is much more difficult than standing in the storm itself, no matter how hard the winds blow. (Cooper, 2006, p. 127)
The end of Typhoon Morakot's torrential rains on August 9, 2009 marked the beginning of a political storm that eventually forced President Ma Ying-Jeou to reshuffle his Cabinet and to renegotiate Taiwan's diplomatic relations with both China and the US.
Dumping as much as three meters of rain in just two days, this unusual meteorological event would have caused massive devastation no matter how prepared the government was. However, the Ma administration's handling of the situation, characterized by slow and disorganized relief efforts, lack of cooperation between military and government, and an initial rejection of foreign aid, exacerbated the tragedy. According to an opinion poll conducted by the pro-government TVBS news channel, President Ma's approval rating dropped to 16 percent two weeks after the typhoon swept across Southern Taiwan. In short, Typhoon Morakot became a political mudslide that buried forever the good image of the newly elected president, who had just won office with over 58 percent of the popular vote a year earlier. The public’s discontent and finger-pointing, voiced through the national media, demanded that he pay a political price for his perceived negligence.
Employing framing analysis to examine more than 2,000 news articles in four leading Taiwanese newspapers, this chapter first identifies the dominant news frame in coverage of Typhoon Morakot—the frame of responsibility—and then explores the
102 specific associated framing strategies used by journalists to define the situation, identify those primarily responsible, and justify the solution offered by the government to restore social consensus. Together these news accounts of blame and accountability not only recorded the progression of Typhoon Morakot and its immediate aftermath, but also illuminated ways in which disaster reporting both conveys public anger and politicizes natural disaster.
Literature Review
Both print and broadcast journalists rely on news frames as conceptual tools to convey, interpret, and evaluate information. As Gitlin (1980) noted, frames refer to
"persistent selection, emphasis, and exclusion...which enable journalists to process large amounts of information quickly and routinely: to recognize it as information, to assign it to cognitive categories, and to package it for efficient relay to their audience" (p. 7).
Frames are inevitable in story-telling. News frames are constructed and articulated using both text (e.g., headings, keywords, metaphors, concepts) and visuals (e.g., photos, layouts). By selecting, repeating, and reinforcing "some aspects of a perceived reality" (p.
52), journalists "make them more salient in a communicating text, in such a way as to promote a particular problem definition, causal interpretation, moral evaluation, and/or treatment recommendation" (Entman, 1993, p. 52). Consequently, news frames not only guide the narrative and visual composition of news discourse, but also provide the audience "a particular way to interpret or understand a reported event" (Fry, 2003, p. 95).
Within the US and European context, Semetko and Valkenburg (2000) have identified five frames common in news coverage: 1) "The conflict frame" emphasizes contest and tension between two rivals, whether individuals, groups, institutions, or
103 nations. A highly used frame in political news, journalists often "[reduce] substantive political debate to overly simplistic conflict", thus inducing "public cynicism and mistrust of political leaders" (Semetko & Valkenburg, 2000, p. 95). 2) "The human interest frame" personalizes events, issues, or problems using relatable characters (i.e., a human face) or represents them using "an emotional angle" (Semetko & Valkenburg, 2000, p. 95). The employment of these types of frames has long been criticized for dramatizing and sensationalizing the news in an attempt to win and maintain viewership (Bennett, 1995).
3) "The economic consequences" frame focuses on the economic impacts of events, issues, or problems on individuals, as well as on institutional, national, regional, and international levels (Semetko & Valkenburg, 2000). Examples of this frame are illustrated in the way that many news stories covering the 3.11 Japanese Earthquake dealt with "financial woe"—the consequences of the disaster for the global economy (Pantti,
Wahl-Jorgensen & Cottle, 2012, p. 53). 4) "The morality frame" underscores the moral lessons embedded in an event, issue, or problem. For instance, New York Times coverage of the 1998 flooding in Central America implied that "the sins of their nations and governments" (i.e., corrupt leaders, backward economies) were to blame for the devastation (Lule, 2001, p. 180). To maintain journalistic objectivity, journalists often rely on indirect means of establishing value-laden moral frames (e.g., quotations, inference). Finally, 5) "the responsibility frame" presents an event, issue, or problem in a specific way to "attribute responsibility for its cause or solution to either the government or to an individual or group" (Semetko & Valkenburg, 2000, p. 96). The responsibility frame can further be divided into "causal responsibility" (i.e., the origin of the problem) and "treatment responsibility" (i.e., the remedy of the problem), which generate different
104 sets of questions, focused on either the originator of the problem or solutions to the problem, respectively (Iyengar, 1991, p. 8).
It well documented that certain news frames profoundly influence audience perceptions of political issues and public policies (Iyengar, 1991; Iyengar & Simon, 1993;
Price, Tewksbury & Powers, 1997). Examining the correlation between television news frames and assignment of responsibility, Iyengar (1991) observed that most news stories can be classified as either "episodic"—that is, depicting social issues in light of actual events (e.g., the Sandy Hook school shooting)—or "thematic"—that is, contextualizing discussions within abstract social parameters using general facts and figures (e.g., gun violence in the US) (p. 14). According to his analysis, the episodic news format tends to elicit "individualistic attributions of responsibility" (Iyengar, 1991, p. 16), while thematic news reports lead the audience to assign blame and responsibility to societal and structural causes. Iyengar (1991) concluded that since television news in the US is dominated by the episodic news format, which simplifies "complex issues to the level of anecdotal evidence", its effect is to divert public attention from societal responsibility and
"effectively [insulate] incumbent officials from any rising tide of disenchantment over the state of public affairs" (p. 137).
In the context of disaster reporting, when news media become the primary source of public information, framing maneuvers strongly shape news consumers' understanding of tragic events. Focusing on the framing effect of news image on the attribution of responsibility, Ben-Porath and Shaker (2010) observed that when readers were presented with a fabricated news account of Hurricane Katrina that comprised only text, they were inclined to hold the government accountable for the tragedy. However, when news
105 accounts were accompanied by victim images and vague captions, reader perceptions diverged on racial lines. Specifically, white respondents found structural factors (i.e., government actions) less of a cause for the crisis, while black readers continued to see
Katrina as "a product of government incompetence or indifference in the face of the suffering of an overwhelmingly [black] population" (p. 482‒483). Their findings somewhat confirmed Iyengar's position that "the presence of people as a visual enhancement of a news story" not only personifies a disaster, but also results in a reassessment of who should be held accountable for the situation (Ben-Porath & Shaker,
2010, p. 482). Notably, audience race affiliation is often an essential element when rendering judgment and interpretation (e.g., Hurricane Katrina). Tierney, Bevc, and
Kuligowski (2006) noted that in the wake of Hurricane Katrina, most media employed the "civil unrest frame" (p.57)—an embodiment of the disaster myth that contends "panic will invariably break out during disasters and other extreme events" (p. 60)—to portray
New Orleans as an "urban warzone" and the disaster victims as criminals (p.57). An important implication of the civil unrest frame was a greater military presence and strict social control, as well as a discursive construction of "unworthy disaster victims" who were less deserving of humanitarian aid and empathy than regular disaster victims
(Garfield, 2007, p. 55).
As Porath and Shaker (2010) rightly noted, "even minor manipulation in the presentation of news" can clearly yield a different outcome in public opinion (p. 484). In an era when the "interlocking media reach into every phase of our lives" (Klotzer, 2007, p.
28), examining how news frames shape collective understating of events has become crucial. Building on the above theoretical foundation, this chapter employs framing
106 analysis (Entman, 1993; Gamson & Lasch, 1983; Pan & Kosicki, 1993) to assess the dominant news frames applied to Typhoon Morakot in leading Taiwanese newspapers.
The period examined runs from August 7, 2009, when the Central Weather Bureau first warned of the typhoon’s approach, to September 3, 2009, the day the Dalai Lama concluded his four-day humanitarian tour of Taiwan.
Method
The research data used in this chapter were collected from four top-selling
Taiwanese newspapers—Apple Daily, The Liberty Times, United Daily, and China Times.
Although the impact of newspapers is currently controversial given their declining readerships, these newspapers retain significant circulation in Taiwan and so deserve scholarly attention. As indicated in a 2008 survey, 43.9 percent of Taiwanese reported that they read newspapers on a daily basis. When asked which newspapers they had read the previous day, 16.3 percent of respondents named Apple Daily, 13.5 percent The
Liberty Times, 9.6 percent United Daily, and 8.7 percent China Times. Further supporting the significance of these publications, AC Nielsen statistics show that during the second quarter (April to June) of 2008, the average daily circulation of The Liberty Times was
699,450 copies, compared to 509,957 copies for Apple Daily (AC Nielsen, 2008);
Taiwan's total population as of 2010 is 23,123,866 (National Statistics Republic of China,
2010).
Each of these four newspapers provides an online database10 that readers can search for text-only news reports. To include visual elements, such as page layout and accompanying photographs, the news articles referenced in this chapter were further
10In the case of United Daily and China Times, users must pay to obtain full access to news stories older than three months.
107 scanned from physical newspapers archived in the National Taiwan University Library and National Central Library. Weekly-bound volumes of each newspaper were manually culled for words and images relating to Typhoon Morakot. All news on Typhoon
Morakot in the four newspapers was collected, including relevant editorials and letters to the editor. However, given that this study focuses on the national perspective of the
Morakot story, the analysis only included news articles from section A (i.e., the national news section). The final sample consists of 579 stories from Apple Daily, 1098 from
Liberty Times, 1077 from United Daily, and 1065 from The China Times.
The data collection process enabled this study to identify the distinct characteristics of each newspaper in three ways. First, compared to its three counterparts,
Apple Daily emphasized visual elements (e.g., centerfold photographs and bold-color charts) in its page layout and contained relatively little text. While the three other newspapers normally published five to seven stories of varying length on each page,
Apple Daily had only three to five. Secondly, although factual information on Typhoon
Morakot was the main focus initially, The Liberty Times, United Daily, and China Times soon reoriented their second and even front page coverage towards stories assigning responsibility, whereas Apple Daily prioritized human-interest stories. Thirdly, each newspaper has its own alleged political bent. The Liberty Times is known for being
Taiwan oriented and having close ties with Taiwan’s pro-independence opposition party—the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). Meanwhile, China Times and United
Daily are considered pro-KMT and China friendly—both devote considerable space to
PRC news. Finally, as a Hong Kong-owned newspaper, Apple Daily is not perceived to be "identified with a particular political party and for that reason was a breath of fresh air
108 for readers shopping for an independent, ideologically less hard-line source of news and opinion" (Weston, 2013, p. 221).
All sampled news articles were subjected to framing analysis to identify the
"syntactical, script, thematic, rhetorical" and visual structures (Pan & Kosicki, 1993, p.
55) embedded in the media coverage of Typhoon Morakot. Framing analysis has long been used to examine critical textual choices in news discourse and thus establish the dominant interpretation of events (Entman, 1993; Gamson & Lasch, 1983; Gitlin, 1980;
Pan & Kosicki, 1993). While the literature on framing is vast and multifaceted, the work of Gamson and Lasch (1983) as well as Pan and Kosicki (1993) can provide a tool to break news texts on Typhoon Morakot into empirically operationalizable dimensions.
Following the same steps as these other investigations, this study focused on examining five news elements, including: