The Interplay of Form and Function in Epipalaeolithic Microliths

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Interplay of Form and Function in Epipalaeolithic Microliths Interpreting Variability Through Multiple Methodologies: The Interplay of Form and Function in Epipalaeolithic Microliths by Danielle Aviva Macdonald A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Anthropology University of Toronto © Copyright by Danielle Aviva Macdonald 2013 Interpreting Variability Through Multiple Methodologies: The Interplay of Form and Function in Epipalaeolithic Microliths Danielle Aviva Macdonald Doctor of Philosophy Department of Anthropology University of Toronto 2013 Abstract The reason and significance of variation in material culture is one of the most fundamental debates in archaeological studies. These debates factor strongly into Levantine Epipalaeolithic research, where the morphological variability of microlithic tools has been interpreted to represent distinct cultural or ethnic communities. This dissertation addresses microlith variability during the Middle Epipalaeolithic (≈17,500 – 14,600 cal BP) through the analysis of lithic assemblages from Wadi Mataha, ‘Uyun al-Hammâm, and Kharaneh IV (Jordan). Although regionally disparate, the lithic assemblages are characterized by the same geometric microlith type: the trapeze-rectangle. The integration of typological, technological, morphometric, and use- wear analyses allows for the subtleties in material culture to be explored among these sites. In addition to these analyses, new methods for use-wear quantification are presented. This dissertation sets out to test several hypotheses in regards to the microlith assemblages: 1) microliths will have overlapping functions, indicating that function does not drive form; and 2) microliths will show differences in technological style. These hypotheses relate back to current debates in Epipalaeolithic research about the nature of microlith variability. Is variation in microlith morphology the product of different technological sequences of production or microlith function? Or is variability the result of different cultural practices? This material culture variability is explored through the lens of the chaîne opératoire, where I advocate for the inclusion of functional analysis into our study of lithic assemblages. Through the integration of multiple methods, I suggest there is not a direct correlation between microlith form and function. ii Instead, the variability we witness in microliths during the Middle Epipalaeolithic is the result of local expressions within different communities. iii Acknowledgments First, I would like to greatly thank my supervisor, Michael Chazan, for his support, advice, and encouragement. His guidance was invaluable throughout this process. I would also like to thank Ted Banning, who first took me to Jordan in 2004 and has encouraged me throughout my research. Thank you to Carl Knappett for insightful comments and discussions about materiality and the chaîne opératoire. I would also like to thank Ed Swenson and Gary Coupland for their thoughtful observations and support. Thank you to Prof. Ofer Bar-Yosef for his comments and insights as my external examiner. A very special thank you to Lisa Maher, whose continued support and friendship over the past decade led me to study the Epipalaeolithic. The field work and research opportunities she offered me at ‘Uyun al-Hammâm and Kharaneh IV have been invaluable. I look forward to many more years of collaboration. Thank you to the field crews from ‘Uyun al-Hammâm and Kharaneh IV, who made excavations a fun and amazing adventure! Importantly, thank you to Toby Richter and Jay Stock, for late night discussions on the Epipalaeolithic, music, and everything in between. Thank you to Joel Janetski for access to the Wadi Mataha material and for the detailed excavation of such an amazing site. I would like to express my gratitude to Jayne Wilkins and Matt Walls. Our discussions over shared lunches will always be treasured. To all of the University of Toronto graduate students, including Jenn Campbell, Adam Allentuck, Lauren Norman, Lesley Howse, Matt Mosher, Phil Hitchings, Emma Humphrey, Greg Braun, Emily Hubbard, and many more, whose friendship and support I cherish. To David Bilton, for letting me harvest his family’s wheat and for enthusiastically participating in the experiment. Thank you to Peter Bikoulis, who took the time to make beautiful maps. Many people graciously shared their expertise with me over the course of this research. To Ben Schoville, who patiently coached me through the tps programs over e-mail. Dan Rahimi, who made three beautiful hafts with his expert wood-working skills and inspired me to explore the experiential element of hafted tools. To Dodi Ben Ami, who knapped a set of amazing geometric iv microliths. Thank you to Patricia Anderson, who invited me to France to participate in the harvest and showed me such amazing hospitality while I was there. To Sylvie Beyries, who trained me in the art of use-wear analysis. The research on quantitative use-wear could not have been possible without the help and support of many people. Conversations with Adrian Evans, James Stemp, and Harry Lerner ignited an interest in use-wear quantification and I look forward to continued work together. Thank you to Jim York from Moog Inc., for spending his weekends at the office while I used the Alicona and for showing me amazing hospitality while I was visiting. Support and software was generously provided by Manfred Prantl and Stefan Scherer from Alicona. Mountains Map software was provided by Anne Berger and Francois Blateyron from Digital Surf. Most importantly, I would like to thank my husband Jim McCarthy. His support, love, and encouragement got me through these years. Without him this would not have been possible. v Table of Contents Acknowledgments .......................................................................................................................... iv Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................... vi List of Tables ............................................................................................................................... xiii List of Figures ............................................................................................................................. xvii Chapter 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Material Culture Variability ................................................................................................ 2 1.2.1 Communicative Style .............................................................................................. 3 1.2.2 Technological Style ................................................................................................ 4 1.2.3 Chaîne Opératoire .................................................................................................. 7 1.2.4 Behavioural Archaeology ....................................................................................... 8 1.3 Summary ........................................................................................................................... 10 1.4 Outline of Thesis ............................................................................................................... 12 Chapter 2 The Epipalaeolithic of the Southern Levant ................................................................. 14 2 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 14 2.1 The Epipalaeolithic ........................................................................................................... 14 2.2 History of Epipalaeolithic Research in the Southern Levant ............................................ 18 2.3 Culture and the Environment ............................................................................................ 22 2.4 The Early Epipalaeolithic (23,000-17,500 cal BP) ........................................................... 27 2.4.1 Masraqan ............................................................................................................... 27 2.4.2 Nebekian ............................................................................................................... 28 2.4.3 Kebaran ................................................................................................................. 28 vi 2.4.4 Nizzanan ............................................................................................................... 29 2.5 The Middle Epipalaeolithic (17,500 – 14,600 cal BP) ..................................................... 30 2.5.1 Geometric Kebaran ............................................................................................... 30 2.5.2 Mushabian ............................................................................................................. 31 2.5.3 Ramonian .............................................................................................................. 32 2.6 The Late Epipalaeolithic (14,600-11,600 cal BP) ............................................................ 32 2.6.1 Early Natufian ....................................................................................................... 32 2.6.2 Late Natufian
Recommended publications
  • Fresh Fields and Pastures New Papers Presented in Honor of Andrew M.T
    Chazan (eds) Chazan & Lillios Fresh Fields and Pastures New PAPERS PRESENTED IN HONOR OF ANDREW M.T. MOORE Fresh Fields and and Fields Fresh Fresh Fields and Pastures New New Pastures This volume honors the career and contributions of Andrew M.T. Moore. Moore’s groundbreaking work at Abu Hureyra, Syria and excavations at Neolithic sites in Croatia have made him a pioneer in integrated interdisciplinary research in archaeology, expressing a deeply held conviction that developments in human culture can only be understood when embedded in an ecological approach. of of in Honor Presented Papers In this book, colleagues and former students of Moore, working in the Near East and A ndrew M. ndrew Croatia, present current research, illustrating the continuing impact of Moore’s work on the early farming and herding peoples of the eastern Mediterranean. T . Moore edited by Sidestone ISidestoneSBN 978-90-8890-348-9 Press Katina T. Lillios & Michael Chazan ISBN: 978-90-8890-348-9 9 789088 903489 This is an Open Access publication. Visit our website for more OA publication, to read any of our books for free online, or to buy them in print or PDF. www.sidestone.com Check out some of our latest publications: Fresh Fields and Pastures New Sidestone Press Fresh Fields and Pastures New PAPERS PRESENTED IN HONOR OF ANDREW M.T. MOORE edited by Katina T. Lillios & Michael Chazan © 2016 individual authors Published by Sidestone Press, Leiden www.sidestone.com ISBN 978-90-8890-348-9 Lay-out & cover design: Sidestone Press Photographs cover: Also available as: e-book (PDF): ISBN 978-90-8890-349-6 Contents Preface 7 Michael Chazan & Katina T.
    [Show full text]
  • House Symbolism and Ancestor Cult in the Central Anatolian Neolithic
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives House Symbolism and Ancestor Cult in the Central Anatolian Neolithic Christopher Fredrik Kvæstad M.A. thesis in Archaeology Department of Archaeology, History, Cultural Studies and Religion University of Bergen November 2010 To Bergljot 2 Contents Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................. 4 List of maps, tables, plates, and figures................................................................................................... 6 Abbreviations .......................................................................................................................................... 8 Chapter I: Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 9 § 1.1 – Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 9 § 1.2 – Space and time....................................................................................................................... 11 § 1.3 – Structure of the thesis ............................................................................................................ 12 Chapter II: Problem formulations and research methods ...................................................................... 14 § 2.1 – Problem formulations
    [Show full text]
  • Faunal Turnover in the Azraq Basin, Eastern Jordan 28,000 to 9,000 Cal BP, Signalling Climate Change and Human Impact
    *Manuscript Click here to view linked References For submission to Quaternary Research Pages 1 Faunal turnover in the Azraq Basin, eastern Jordan 28,000 to 9,000 cal BP, signalling climate change and human impact Louise Martina, b, c, Yvonne H. Edwardsa, Joe Roea, Andrew Garrarda aInstitute of Archaeology, University College London, Gordon Square London WC1H 0PY: bcorresponding author: [email protected] Page 2 Abstract Recent zooarchaeological analyses of game exploitation in the Epipalaeolithic of the Southern Levant identify a decline in large game in the Natufian, with corresponding increase in small prey, interpreted as hunting pressure driven by population expansion. To date, studies focus on the Mediterranean zone. This paper adopts similar approaches to examine Epipalaeolithic to Neolithic faunal data from 16 sites in the steppic Jordanian Azraq Basin. Results here reveal very different trends. Large game, mainly equids, fluctuate throughout the Epipalaeolithic, due to climatic conditions and available water/vegetation. Cattle thrive in the Azraq oasis, showing no decline in the Late Epipalaeolithic. Gazelle exploitation is predominant and sustainable throughout the Epipalaeolithic, even at Kharaneh IV and Wadi Jilat 6 ‘megasites’. However, PPNB assemblages from the limestone steppe show intensive game exploitation resulting from longer-stay settlement. The focused gazelle-hunting camp at Dhuweila in the Basalt desert also shows pressure from indiscriminate culling impacting herd demography, interpreted as providing meat for onwards exchange. Human impacts on steppe fauna appear both local and in many cases short-term, unlike the large-game suppression reported from west of the Rift Valley. Resource pressures and game over-kill, whether population-driven or otherwise, are not currently apparent east of the Jordan River.
    [Show full text]
  • Island Archaeology and the Origins of Seafaring in the Eastern Mediterranean
    An offprint from ISLAND ARCHAEOLOGY AND THE ORIGINS OF SEAFARING IN THE EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN Proceedings of the Wenner Gren Workshop held at Reggio Calabria on October 19-21, 2012 In memory of John D. Evans Eurasian Prehistory Guest Editors: Albert J. Ammerman and Thomas Davis PART ONE (Eurasian Prehistory 10/2013) Introduction 1. Introduction Albert J. Ammerman 2. Chronological framework Thomas W. Davis Placing island archaeology and early voyaging in context 3. The origins of mammals on the Mediterranean islands as an indicator of early voyaging Jean-Denis Vigne 4. Cosmic impact, the Younger Dryas, Abu Hureyra, and the inception of agriculture in Western Asia Andrew M. T. Moore and Douglas J. Kennett 5. The homelands of the Cyprus colonizers: selected comments Ofer Bar-Yosef 6. Marine resources in the Early Neolithic of the Levant: their relevance to early seafaring Daniella E. Bar-Yosef Mayer 7. Early seafaring and the archaeology of submerged landscapes Geoff N. Bailey Case studies A. Cyprus 8. Tracing the steps in the fieldwork at the sites of Aspros and Nissi Beach on Cyprus Albert J. Ammerman 9. Akrotiri-Aetokremnos (Cyprus) 20 years later: an assessment of its significance Alan H. Simmons 10. The transportation of mammals to Cyprus sheds light on early voyaging and boats in the Mediterranean Sea Jean-Denis Vigne, Antoine Zazzo, Isabella Carrère, François Briois and Jean Guilaine 11. On the chipped stone assemblages at Klimonas and Shillourokambos and their links with the mainland François Briois and Jean Guilaine PART TWO (Eurasian Prehistory 11/2014) 12. Temporal placement and context of Cyro-PPNA activity on Cyprus Sturt W.
    [Show full text]
  • From Intermediate Economies to Agriculture: Trends in Wild Food Use, Domestication and Cultivation Among Early Villages in Southwest Asia
    From intermediate economies to agriculture: trends in wild food use, domestication and cultivation among early villages in southwest Asia Dorian Q Fuller1, Leilani Lucas2, Lara González Carretero1, Chris Stevens1 1University College London, 31-34 Gordon Square, Institute of Archaeology, London, WC1H 0PY 2College of Southern Nevada, 6375 W. Charleston Blvd. Las Vegas, NV 89146 Corresponding author email: [email protected] Abstract This paper addresses the range of subsistence strategies in the protracted transition to agriculture in southwest Asia. Discussed and defined here are the intermediate economies that can be characterized by a mixed-subsistence economy of wild plant exploitation, fruit cultivation and crop agriculture. Archaeobotanical data from sites located across the Fertile Crescent and dated 12000 to 5000 cal BC are compared alongside a backdrop of data for domestication (i.e. non-shattering rachises and seed size increase) and crop diversity with regionally distinct profiles of crop agriculture and wild food exploitation. This research highlights sub-regional variations across southwest Asia in the timing of subsistence change in the transition from hunting and gathering to diversified agricultural systems. Keywords Archaeobotany, Neolithic, Foraging, Near East, Domestication Résumé Cet article aborde la diversité des stratégies de subsistance au cours du long processus de transition vers l’agriculture en Asie du Sud-Ouest. Il s’agira de discuter et de définir les économies intermédiaires qui peuvent être caractérisées
    [Show full text]
  • Epipalaeolithic and Pre-Pottery Neolithic Burials from the North Lebanese Highlands in Their Regional Context Andrew Garrard1, Y
    Epipalaeolithic and Pre-Pottery Neolithic burials from the north Lebanese highlands in their regional context Andrew Garrard1, Yvonne Edwards1, Jay Stock2 and Corine Yazbeck3 Archaeological human remains and their funerary contexts provide valuable insights into social and ideological lives as well as the origins, health and activities of past communities. In the southern Levant extensive cemeteries from the Late Epipalaeolithic (Natufian) and Pre-Pottery Neolithic (PPN) have been recognized, although burials from earlier periods are sparse. Elsewhere in the Levant the record from the whole Epipalaeolithic is poor. Excavations at two adjacent caves at Moghr el-Ahwal in the Qadisha Valley of northern Lebanon have provided a window into human lives and mortuary practices from an otherwise poorly known region. This includes material from contexts with radiocarbon dates ranging from the late Kebaran, Geometric Kebaran and Natufian (c. 19-13.8 ka cal BP) as well as directly dated skeletal material from the mid to late Pre-Pottery Neolithic B (c. 9.9-9.5 ka cal BP). Although this forested mountain area may have been isolated from other regions in the Levant, the burial practices show links to the wider area. Keywords Epipalaeolithic, Pre-Pottery Neolithic, Levant, Lebanon, burial practices, Moghr el-Ahwal 1 Institute of Archaeology, University College London, UK 2 Department of Archaeology and Anthropology, Cambridge, UK 3 Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon Andrew Garrard (Corresponding author) Institute of Archaeology, University College London, 31-34 Gordon Square, London WC1H 0PY: e-mail: [email protected] Introduction Knowledge of late Palaeolithic and early Neolithic mortuary practices in the Levant continues to grow, providing a better appreciation of the social and ideological lives of these communities and how they viewed, treated and related to their ancestors.
    [Show full text]
  • Proquest Dissertations
    A techno-typological analysis of Tor al-Tareeq (WHS 1065): An Epipaleolithic site in west-central Jordan Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Stevens, Michelle Nanette, 1965- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 04/10/2021 03:05:54 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/291374 INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly fi'om the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely afifect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, begiiming at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with smaU overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book.
    [Show full text]
  • From Mobile Foragers to Complex Societies in Southwest Asia
    FROM MOBILE FORAGERS TO COMPLEX SOCIETIES 7 IN SOUTHWEST ASIA Trevor Watkins, University of Edinburgh Terminologies in Southwest Asia 199 KEY SITE Jerf el Ahmar: A Neolithic Village 212 Landscapes and Environments of Southwest Asia: Defining the “Core Area” 199 A Cascade of Rapid Change: The Later Aceramic Neolithic (8800–6500 BCE) 214 A Crescendo of Change (20,000–8800 BCE) 201 KEY SITE KEY CONTROVERSY Göbekli Tepe: Religious Structures Explaining the Neolithic Revolution 203 at a “Central Place” 216 KEY THEME: CLIMATE CHANGE KEY SITE Environmental Shocks in Southwest Asia 204 Çatalhöyük 220 KEY SITE KEY THEME: DOMESTICATION Ohalo II: Epipaleolithic Lifeways in the Levant 205 A Story of Unintended Consequences 224 KEY SITE Transformation, Dispersal, and Expansion Abu Hureyra: The Transition from (6500–6000 BCE) 225 Foraging to Farming 208 KEY SITE Tell Sabi Abyad I 226 Summary and Conclusions 228 Further Reading and Suggested Websites 229 A cluster of skulls, retrieved from burials at Tell Aswad, northern Syria, with facial features modeled in painted clay, and eyes closed as if in sleep. 198 198-229_HP4E_chap-7_rf.indd 198 P.198 B 26/10/2017 16:23 n Chapter 6 we reviewed the profound transformation of is known as the Epipaleolithic in Southwest Asia. Radiocarbon Iclimate and environment that accompanied the melting of dating shows that it lasted about thirteen millennia (23,000– the ice sheets, and the development of agriculture in different 9600 BCE). The beginning of the Neolithic conveniently coincides regions of the world during the milder Holocene period. with the beginning of the Holocene period (at about 9600 BCE).
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Meat Outside the Freezer
    Meat Outside the Freezer: Drying, Smoking, Salting and Sealing Meat in Fat at an Epipalaeolithic Megasite in Eastern Jordan Anna Spyroua*, Lisa A. Maherb, Louise A. Martinc, Danielle A. Macdonaldd, Andrew Garrarde a* Corresponding author, The Science and Technology in Archaeology and Culture Research Center (STARC), The Cyprus Institute, Konstantinou Kavafi Street, 20, Aglantzia, Nicosia 2121, [email protected] b Department of Anthropology, University of California, Berkeley, 232 Kroeber Hall, Berkeley, CA, USA, 94720- 3710, [email protected]. c,,e UCL Institute of Archaeology, 31-34 Gordon Square, London WC1H0PY U, [email protected], [email protected]. d Department of Anthropology, The University of Tulsa, 800 South Ticker Drive, Tulsa, OK, 74104, United States, [email protected]. Paper Highlights - Preservation of meat is difficult to be identified in the archaeological record. - This paper attempts to refine methods for recognizing meat presercation. - There is a wide diversity in hunter-gatherers’ preservation and storage methods. - Meat preservation was practiced by Epipalaeolithic hunter-gatherers. - The study makes a contribution to the archaeological visibility of meat storage. ABSTRACT Even though pivotal for understanding many aspects of human behaviour, preservation and storage of animal resources has not received great attention from archaeologists. One could argue that the main problem lies in the difficulties of demonstrating meat storage archaeologically due to the lack of direct evidence. This paper represents an attempt to refine zooarchaeological methods for the recognition of meat preservation and storage at prehistoric sites. Drawing on the faunal assemblage from Kharaneh IV, an Early/Middle Epipalaeolithic aggregation site in Eastern Jordan, this study demonstrates that a combination of taphonomic and contextual analyses alongside ethographic information may indeed lead archaeologists to insights not directly available from the archaeological record.
    [Show full text]