DOCSLIB.ORG

2P16.3 (NRXN1) Deletions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2P16.3 (NRXN1) Deletions 2p16.3 (NRXN1) deletions rarechromo.org Sources and 2p16.3 (NRXN1) deletions references A 2p16.3 deletion is a rare genetic condition caused by a The information in this tiny missing part of one of the body’s 46 chromosomes – guide is drawn partly chromosome 2. For healthy development, from the published chromosomes should contain just the right amount of medical literature. The material – not too much and not too little. Even a tiny first-named author piece of missing material can disrupt development, although it doesn’t always do so. and publication date are given so you can Background on Chromosomes look for the abstracts Chromosomes are structures found in the nucleus of or original articles on the body’s cells. Every chromosome contains thousands the internet in PubMed of genes which may be thought of as individual (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov instruction booklets (or recipes) that contain all the /pubmed/). If you wish, genetic information telling the body how to develop, you can obtain most grow and function. Chromosomes (and genes) usually articles from Unique. come in pairs with one half of each chromosome pair However, many being inherited from each parent. Humans have 23 pairs individuals in the of chromosomes giving a total of 46 individual medical literature chromosomes. Of these 46 chromosomes, two are the were diagnosed as a sex chromosomes that determine gender. Females result of several large have two X chromosomes and males have one X studies of people with chromosome and one Y chromosome. The remaining 44 autism spectrum chromosomes are grouped in 22 pairs, numbered 1 to disorder, epilepsy or 22 approximately from the largest to the smallest. Each schizophrenia and chromosome has a short or petit (p) arm and a long (q) there is very little arm, shown on the diagram on page 3. additional information available about these Chromosome Deletions individuals. In A sperm cell from the father and an egg cell from the addition, this leaflet mother each carries just one copy of each chromosome. draws on information When they join together they form a single cell that now from a survey of carries two copies of each chromosome. This cell must members of Unique make many copies of itself (and all the chromosomes conducted in 2013, and genetic material) in order to make all of the many referenced Unique. cells that form during human growth and development. When this guide was Sometimes during the formation of the egg or sperm written in March 2014, cells or during this complicated copying and replication Unique had 25 process, parts of the chromosomes can break off or member families with become arranged differently from usual. People with a a microdeletion at 2p16.3 deletion have one intact chromosome 2, but a 2p16.3 ranging in age piece from the short arm of the other copy is missing. It from a 3-year-old to is believed that most of the clinical difficulties are an adult. probably caused by having only one copy (instead of the 2 usual two) of a gene (or number of genes) from the missing piece. It is important to keep in mind that a child’s other genes, environment and unique personality also help to determine future development, needs and achievements. Looking at 2p16.3 You can’t see chromosomes with the naked eye, but if you stain them and magnify them under a microscope, you can see that each one has a distinctive pattern of light and dark bands. You can see these bands in the diagram of the long arm of chromosome 2 at the bottom on this page. Band 2p16.3 contains around 5.1 million base pairs. This sounds a lot but it is actually quite small and is less 1 base pair = bp than 0.2 per cent of the DNA in each cell and only 2 per 1,000 base pairs = 1kb cent of the DNA on chromosome 2. Base pairs are the 1,000,000 base pairs = 1Mb chemicals in DNA that form the ends of the ‘rungs’ of its ladder-like structure. Even if you magnify the chromosomes as much as possible, to about 850 times life size, a chromosome 2 with the microdeletion at p16.3 looks normal. People who have missing material on a chromosome are said to have a deletion but when the amount is so small that it can’t be seen even under a high-powered microscope, it is called a microdeletion. The 2p16.3 deletion can only be found using molecular or DNA technology, in particular a technique using microarrays (arrayCGH), that shows gains and losses of tiny amounts of DNA throughout the genome and can demonstrate whether particular gene(s) are present or not (Unique has prepared a guide to arrayCGH which can be freely downloaded from (www.rarechromo.org/information/Other/Array%20CGH%20QFN.pdf). One gene, Neurexin 1 (NRXN1) located on 2p16.3, has been suggested as being responsible for most, if not all, of the features of a 2p16.3 deletion (see Research involving 2p16.3 on page 16). This guide includes descriptions of people who have a 2p16.3 microdeletion and also people who have a full or partial deletion of the NRXN1 gene. NRXN1 (50.1Mb-51.2Mb) 47.8Mb 52.9Mb p16.3 1Mb 243Mb p arm centromere q arm The numbers in this diagram refer to the human genome Chromosome 2 build 19 (hg19; see page 4 for more details). Your child’s report may refer to a different human genome build. Please contact Unique or your genetic specialist for any help with understanding the report. 3 Genetic Report Your geneticist or genetic counsellor will be able to tell you about the points where the chromosome has broken in your child. With a 2p16.3 microdeletion, the results are likely to read something like the following example: arr[hg19] 2p16.3 (50,713,464-51,043,557)x1 dn arr The analysis was by array (arr) comparative genomic hybridisation (cgh) hg19 Human Genome build 19. This is the reference DNA sequence that the base pair numbers refer to. As more information about the human genome is found, new ‘builds’ of the genome are made and the base pair numbers may be adjusted 2p16.3 The chromosome involved is 2 and the position of the deletion is in band p16.3 50,713,464-51,043,557 The base pairs between 50,713,464 and 51,043,557 have been shown to be deleted. Take the first long number from the second and you get 330,093 (0.330Mb or 330kb). This is the number of base pairs that are deleted x1 means there is one copy of these base pairs, not two – one on each chromosome 2 – as you would normally expect dn means de novo. The parents’ chromosomes have been checked and no deletion or other chromosome change has been found at 2p16.3. The deletion is very unlikely to be inherited and has almost certainly occurred for the first time in this family with this child. mat means that the deletion has been inherited from the mother; pat means that it has been inherited from the father. How common is the 2p16.3 deletion? It is surprisingly common, almost certainly found as often as much better known syndromes such as Prader-Willi. Several large scale studies have shown that the 2p16.3 deletion occurs in around 1 in 2,500 to 1 in 4,000 people with schizophrenia or developmental delay; and about 1 in 5,000 people not affected by schizophrenia or developmental delay (Kirov 2008; Ching 2010; Schaaf 2012). 4 How much do we know? Comparing different children and adults with 2p16.3 (NRXN1) deletions shows that some effects seem to be very broadly similar. This information guide tells you what is known about those effects. Comparing your child’s array results with others, both in the medical literature and within Unique, can help to build up a general picture of what to expect. But there will still be differences, sometimes quite marked, between your child and others with an apparently similar array result. It is very important to see your child as an individual and not to make direct comparisons with others with the same chromosome test results. After all, each of us is unique. Most common features Every person with a 2p16.3 (NRXN1) deletion is unique and so each person will have different medical and developmental concerns. Additionally, no one person will have all of the features listed in this information guide. However, a number of common features have emerged: Children are likely to need support with learning. The amount of support needed by each child will vary Seizures Speech and language delay Behavioural difficulties such as autism spectrum disorder Otherwise generally healthy What is the outlook? We can’t be certain yet but there appears to be no reason why people who are healthy should not enjoy a normal lifespan. However, regression has been reported in three out of more than a hundred people in the medical literature (Schaaf 2012). Are there people with a 2p16.3 (NRXN1) deletion who are healthy, have no major birth defects and have developed normally? There are many individuals with either a deletion or disruption to the NRXN1 gene who have developed normally and have no major birth defects, all of whom only discovered they had the deletion when it was detected in their children or they were a control (unaffected) individual in one of the large scale studies. Both fathers and mothers have passed the microdeletion on to their children (Dabell 2012; Béna 2013; Unique).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cellular and Synaptic Network Defects in Autism
    Cellular and synaptic network defects in autism The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation Peca, Joao, and Guoping Feng. “Cellular and Synaptic Network Defects in Autism.” Current Opinion in Neurobiology 22, no. 5 (October 2012): 866–872. As Published http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2012.02.015 Publisher Elsevier Version Author's final manuscript Citable link http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/102179 Terms of Use Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-NoDerivatives Detailed Terms http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Curr Opin Neurobiol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2013 October 01. Published in final edited form as: Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2012 October ; 22(5): 866–872. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2012.02.015. Cellular and synaptic network defects in autism João Peça1 and Guoping Feng1,2 $watermark-text1McGovern $watermark-text Institute $watermark-text for Brain Research, Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA 2Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA Abstract Many candidate genes are now thought to confer susceptibility to autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Here we review four interrelated complexes, each composed of multiple families of genes that functionally coalesce on common cellular pathways. We illustrate a common thread in the organization of glutamatergic synapses and suggest a link between genes involved in Tuberous Sclerosis Complex, Fragile X syndrome, Angelman syndrome and several synaptic ASD candidate genes. When viewed in this context, progress in deciphering the molecular architecture of cellular protein-protein interactions together with the unraveling of synaptic dysfunction in neural networks may prove pivotal to advancing our understanding of ASDs.
    [Show full text]
  • Combinatorial Genomic Data Refute the Human Chromosome 2 Evolutionary Fusion and Build a Model of Functional Design for Interstitial Telomeric Repeats
    The Proceedings of the International Conference on Creationism Volume 8 Print Reference: Pages 222-228 Article 32 2018 Combinatorial Genomic Data Refute the Human Chromosome 2 Evolutionary Fusion and Build a Model of Functional Design for Interstitial Telomeric Repeats Jeffrey P. Tomkins Institute for Creation Research Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/icc_proceedings Part of the Biology Commons, and the Genomics Commons DigitalCommons@Cedarville provides a publication platform for fully open access journals, which means that all articles are available on the Internet to all users immediately upon publication. However, the opinions and sentiments expressed by the authors of articles published in our journals do not necessarily indicate the endorsement or reflect the views of DigitalCommons@Cedarville, the Centennial Library, or Cedarville University and its employees. The authors are solely responsible for the content of their work. Please address questions to [email protected]. Browse the contents of this volume of The Proceedings of the International Conference on Creationism. Recommended Citation Tomkins, J.P. 2018. Combinatorial genomic data refute the human chromosome 2 evolutionary fusion and build a model of functional design for interstitial telomeric repeats. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Creationism, ed. J.H. Whitmore, pp. 222–228. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: Creation Science Fellowship. Tomkins, J.P. 2018. Combinatorial genomic data refute the human chromosome 2 evolutionary fusion and build a model of functional design for interstitial telomeric repeats. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Creationism, ed. J.H. Whitmore, pp. 222–228. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: Creation Science Fellowship. COMBINATORIAL GENOMIC DATA REFUTE THE HUMAN CHROMOSOME 2 EVOLUTIONARY FUSION AND BUILD A MODEL OF FUNCTIONAL DESIGN FOR INTERSTITIAL TELOMERIC REPEATS Jeffrey P.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Targeting of NRXN2 in Mice Unveils Role in Excitatory Cortical Synapse Function and Social Behaviors
    King’s Research Portal DOI: 10.3389/fnsyn.2015.00003 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication record in King's Research Portal Citation for published version (APA): Born, G., Grayton, H. M., Langhorst, H., Dudanova, I., Rohlmann, A., Woodward, B. W., Collier, D. A., Fernandes, C., & Missler, M. (2015). Genetic targeting of NRXN2 in mice unveils role in excitatory cortical synapse function and social behaviors. Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience, 7(0), [3]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsyn.2015.00003 Citing this paper Please note that where the full-text provided on King's Research Portal is the Author Accepted Manuscript or Post-Print version this may differ from the final Published version. If citing, it is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version for pagination, volume/issue, and date of publication details. And where the final published version is provided on the Research Portal, if citing you are again advised to check the publisher's website for any subsequent corrections. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the Research Portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognize and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. •Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the Research Portal for the purpose of private study or research. •You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain •You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the Research Portal Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
    [Show full text]
  • P.1.H.029. Abnormality of Social Behavior and Dysfunction of Autism
    P.1.h.029. Abnormality of social behavior and dysfunction of autism related gene expression developing under chronic social defeat stress in male mice Kudryavtseva N.N., Kovalenko I.L., Smagin D.A., Galyamina A.G., Babenko V.N. Federal Research Center, Institute of Cytology and Genetics of SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia The ability of people to communicate with each other is a necessary component of social behavior and the normal development of individuals living in a community. An apparent decline in sociability may be the result of a negative social environment or the development of neurological disorders, including autistic spectrum disorders. The behavior of these humans may be characterized by the impairment of socialization, low communication, restricted and repetitive behaviors. This study aimed to analyze changes in the social behaviors induced by daily social defeat stress in male mice and to study the involvement of autism associated genes in the process of the deterioration of social behaviors. sensory contact agonistic interactions aggressive defeated mice Methods.The sensory contact model [1] was mice used to generate repeated experience of social defeats in male mice of C57BL/6J strain. After three days of sensory contact the partition is removed for 10 min to allow agonistic interactions between males. Undoubted superiority of one of the partners is evident The collected brain samples were sequenced at JSC Genoanalytica (www.genoanalytica.ru, within 2-3 daily social encounters with the same Moscow, Russia), where the mRNA was extracted using the Dynabeads mRNA Purification Kit (Ambion, USA). cDNA libraries were constructed using NEBNext mRNA Library PrepReagent Set opponent.
    [Show full text]
  • Neurexin II Alpha (NRXN2) (NM 015080) Human Tagged ORF Clone Product Data
    OriGene Technologies, Inc. 9620 Medical Center Drive, Ste 200 Rockville, MD 20850, US Phone: +1-888-267-4436 [email protected] EU: [email protected] CN: [email protected] Product datasheet for RC219788 Neurexin II alpha (NRXN2) (NM_015080) Human Tagged ORF Clone Product data: Product Type: Expression Plasmids Product Name: Neurexin II alpha (NRXN2) (NM_015080) Human Tagged ORF Clone Tag: Myc-DDK Symbol: NRXN2 Vector: pCMV6-Entry (PS100001) E. coli Selection: Kanamycin (25 ug/mL) Cell Selection: Neomycin ORF Nucleotide >RC219788 representing NM_015080 Sequence: Red=Cloning site Blue=ORF Green=Tags(s) TTTTGTAATACGACTCACTATAGGGCGGCCGGGAATTCGTCGACTGGATCCGGTACCGAGGAGATCTGCC GCCGCGATCGCC ATGGCGTCCGGGAGCCGGTGGCGGCCGACACCGCCGCCGCTGCTGTTGCTGCTGCTGCTGGCGCTGGCGG CGCGCGCGGACGGCCTGGAGTTCGGCGGCGGCCCCGGGCAGTGGGCTCGCTACGCGCGCTGGGCGGGCGC GGCGAGCAGCGGCGAGCTCAGCTTCAGCCTGCGCACCAACGCCACGCGCGCGCTGCTGCTCTACCTGGAC GACGGCGGCGACTGCGACTTCCTGGAGCTGCTGCTGGTGGACGGCCGCCTGCGGCTGCGCTTCACGCTTT CGTGCGCCGAGCCGGCCACGCTGCAGCTGGACACGCCGGTGGCCGACGACCGCTGGCACATGGTGCTGCT GACCCGCGACGCGCGCCGCACGGCGCTGGCGGTGGACGGCGAGGCCCGCGCCGCCGAGGTGCGCTCCAAG CGGCGCGAGATGCAGGTGGCCAGCGACCTGTTCGTGGGCGGCATCCCGCCCGACGTGCGCCTCTCGGCGC TTACGCTGAGCACCGTCAAGTACGAGCCGCCCTTCCGCGGCCTCTTGGCCAACCTGAAGCTGGGCGAGCG GCCCCCCGCGCTGCTGGGCAGCCAGGGCCTGCGCGGCGCCACCGCCGACCCGCTGTGCGCGCCCGCGCGC AACCCCTGCGCCAACGGCGGCCTCTGCACCGTGCTGGCCCCCGGCGAGGTGGGCTGCGACTGCAGCCACA CGGGCTTCGGCGGCAAGTTCTGCAGCGAAGAGGAGCACCCCATGGAAGGTCCGGCTCACCTGACGTTAAA CAGCGAAGTAGGGTCCTTACTGTTCTCCGAGGGGGGGGCCGGGAGAGGAGGAGCCGGCGATGTGCACCAG CCAACAAAAGGCAAGGAGGAGTTTGTGGCGACCTTCAAAGGCAATGAGTTCTTCTGCTACGACCTGTCAC
    [Show full text]
  • 1311.Full.Pdf
    Copyright © 2005 by the Genetics Society of America DOI: 10.1534/genetics.104.033167 Chromosome Loss Followed by Duplication Is the Major Mechanism of Spontaneous Mating-Type Locus Homozygosis in Candida albicans Wei Wu, Claude Pujol, Shawn R. Lockhart and David R. Soll1 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242 Manuscript received July 7, 2004 Accepted for publication December 7, 2004 ABSTRACT Candida albicans, which is diploid, possesses a single mating-type (MTL) locus on chromosome 5, which is normally heterozygous (a/␣). To mate, C. albicans must undergo MTL homozygosis to a/a or ␣/␣. Three possible mechanisms may be used in this process, mitotic recombination, gene conversion, or loss of one chromosome 5 homolog, followed by duplication of the retained homolog. To distinguish among these mechanisms, 16 spontaneous a/a and ␣/␣ derivatives were cloned from four natural a/␣ strains, P37037, P37039, P75063, and P34048, grown on nutrient agar. Eighteen polymorphic (heterozygous) markers were identified on chromosome 5, 6 to the left and 12 to the right of the MTL locus. These markers were then analyzed in MTL-homozygous derivatives of the four natural a/␣ strains to distinguish among the three mechanisms of homozygosis. An analysis of polymorphisms on chromosomes 1, 2, and R excluded meiosis as a mechanism of MTL homozygosis. The results demonstrate that while mitotic recombination was the mechanism for homozygosis in one offspring, loss of one chromosome 5 homolog followed by duplication of the retained homolog was the mechanism in the remaining 15 offspring, indicating that the latter mechanism is the most common in the spontaneous generation of MTL homozy- gotes in natural strains of C.
    [Show full text]
  • Lrrtms and Neuroligins Bind Neurexins with a Differential Code to Cooperate in Glutamate Synapse Development
    The Journal of Neuroscience, June 2, 2010 • 30(22):7495–7506 • 7495 Cellular/Molecular LRRTMs and Neuroligins Bind Neurexins with a Differential Code to Cooperate in Glutamate Synapse Development Tabrez J. Siddiqui, Raika Pancaroglu, Yunhee Kang, Amanda Rooyakkers, and Ann Marie Craig Brain Research Centre and Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 2B5, Canada Leucine-rich repeat transmembrane neuronal proteins (LRRTMs) were recently found to instruct presynaptic and mediate postsynaptic glutamatergic differentiation. In a candidate screen, here we identify neurexin-1␤ lacking an insert at splice site 4 (ϪS4) as a ligand for LRRTM2. Neurexins bind LRRTM2 with a similar affinity but distinct code from the code for binding neuroligin-1 (the predominant form of neuroligin-1 at glutamate synapses, containing the B splice site insert). Whereas neuroligin-1 binds to neurexins 1, 2, and 3 ␤ but not ␣ variants, regardless of insert at splice site 4, LRRTM2 binds to neurexins 1, 2, and 3 ␣ and ␤ variants specifically lacking an insert at splicesite4.WefurthershowthatthisbindingcodeisconservedinLRRTM1,thefamilymemberlinkedtoschizophreniaandhandedness, and that the code is functional in a coculture hemisynapse formation assay. Mutagenesis of LRRTM2 to prevent binding to neurexins abolishes presynaptic inducing activity of LRRTM2. Remarkably, mutagenesis of neurexins shows that the binding face on neurexin-1␤ (ϪS4) is highly overlapping for the structurally distinct LRRTM2 and neuroligin-1 partners. Finally, we explore here the interplay of neuroligin-1 and LRRTM2 in synapse regulation. In neuron cultures, LRRTM2 is more potent than neuroligin-1 in promoting synaptic differentiation, and, most importantly, these two families of neurexin-binding partners cooperate in an additive or synergistic manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental and Genetic Factors in Autism Spectrum Disorders: Special Emphasis on Data from Arabian Studies
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Review Environmental and Genetic Factors in Autism Spectrum Disorders: Special Emphasis on Data from Arabian Studies Noor B. Almandil 1,† , Deem N. Alkuroud 2,†, Sayed AbdulAzeez 2, Abdulla AlSulaiman 3, Abdelhamid Elaissari 4 and J. Francis Borgio 2,* 1 Department of Clinical Pharmacy Research, Institute for Research and Medical Consultation (IRMC), Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam 31441, Saudi Arabia; [email protected] 2 Department of Genetic Research, Institute for Research and Medical Consultation (IRMC), Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam 31441, Saudi Arabia; [email protected] (D.N.A.); [email protected] (S.A.) 3 Department of Neurology, College of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam 31441, Saudi Arabia; [email protected] or [email protected] 4 Univ Lyon, University Claude Bernard Lyon-1, CNRS, LAGEP-UMR 5007, F-69622 Lyon, France; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] or [email protected]; Tel.: +966-13-333-0864 † These authors contributed equally to this work. Received: 26 January 2019; Accepted: 19 February 2019; Published: 23 February 2019 Abstract: One of the most common neurodevelopmental disorders worldwide is autism spectrum disorder (ASD), which is characterized by language delay, impaired communication interactions, and repetitive patterns of behavior caused by environmental and genetic factors. This review aims to provide a comprehensive survey of recently published literature on ASD and especially novel insights into excitatory synaptic transmission. Even though numerous genes have been discovered that play roles in ASD, a good understanding of the pathophysiologic process of ASD is still lacking.
    [Show full text]
  • Slitrks Control Excitatory and Inhibitory Synapse Formation with LAR
    Slitrks control excitatory and inhibitory synapse SEE COMMENTARY formation with LAR receptor protein tyrosine phosphatases Yeong Shin Yima,1, Younghee Kwonb,1, Jungyong Namc, Hong In Yoona, Kangduk Leeb, Dong Goo Kima, Eunjoon Kimc, Chul Hoon Kima,2, and Jaewon Kob,2 aDepartment of Pharmacology, Brain Research Institute, Brain Korea 21 Project for Medical Science, Severance Biomedical Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 120-752, Korea; bDepartment of Biochemistry, College of Life Science and Biotechnology, Yonsei University, Seoul 120-749, Korea; and cCenter for Synaptic Brain Dysfunctions, Institute for Basic Science, Department of Biological Sciences, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon 305-701, Korea Edited by Thomas C. Südhof, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, and approved December 26, 2012 (received for review June 11, 2012) The balance between excitatory and inhibitory synaptic inputs, share a similar domain organization comprising three Ig domains which is governed by multiple synapse organizers, controls neural and four to eight fibronectin type III repeats. LAR-RPTP family circuit functions and behaviors. Slit- and Trk-like proteins (Slitrks) are members are evolutionarily conserved and are functionally required a family of synapse organizers, whose emerging synaptic roles are for axon guidance and synapse formation (15). Recent studies have incompletely understood. Here, we report that Slitrks are enriched shown that netrin-G ligand-3 (NGL-3), neurotrophin receptor ty- in postsynaptic densities in rat brains. Overexpression of Slitrks rosine kinase C (TrkC), and IL-1 receptor accessory protein-like 1 promoted synapse formation, whereas RNAi-mediated knock- (IL1RAPL1) bind to all three LAR-RPTP family members or dis- down of Slitrks decreased synapse density.
    [Show full text]
  • Deletion of Α-Neurexin II Results in Autism-Related
    OPEN Citation: Transl Psychiatry (2014) 4, e484; doi:10.1038/tp.2014.123 www.nature.com/tp ORIGINAL ARTICLE Deletion of α-neurexin II results in autism-related behaviors in mice J Dachtler1, J Glasper2, RN Cohen1, JL Ivorra1, DJ Swiffen1, AJ Jackson1, MK Harte2, RJ Rodgers3 and SJ Clapcote1 Autism is a common and frequently disabling neurodevelopmental disorder with a strong genetic basis. Human genetic studies have discovered mutations disrupting exons of the NRXN2 gene, which encodes the synaptic adhesion protein α-neurexin II (Nrxn2α), in two unrelated individuals with autism, but a causal link between NRXN2 and the disorder remains unclear. To begin to test the hypothesis that Nrxn2α deficiency contributes to the symptoms of autism, we employed Nrxn2α knockout (KO) mice that genetically model Nrxn2α deficiency in vivo. We report that Nrxn2α KO mice displayed deficits in sociability and social memory when exposed to novel conspecifics. In tests of exploratory activity, Nrxn2α KO mice displayed an anxiety-like phenotype in comparison with wild-type littermates, with thigmotaxis in an open field, less time spent in the open arms of an elevated plus maze, more time spent in the enclosure of an emergence test and less time spent exploring novel objects. However, Nrxn2α KO mice did not exhibit any obvious changes in prepulse inhibition or in passive avoidance learning. Real-time PCR analysis of the frontal cortex and hippocampus revealed significant decreases in the mRNA levels of genes encoding proteins involved in both excitatory and inhibitory transmission. Quantification of protein expression revealed that Munc18-1, encoded by Stxbp1, was significantly decreased in the hippocampus of Nrxn2α KO mice, which is suggestive of deficiencies in presynaptic vesicular release.
    [Show full text]
  • Chromosome 2 Introduction the Genetic Length of Chromosome 2
    Chromosome 2 ©Chromosome Disorder Outreach Inc. (CDO) Technical genetic content provided by Dr. Iosif Lurie, M.D. Ph.D Medical Geneticist and CDO Medical Consultant/Advisor. Ideogram courtesy of the University of Washington Department of Pathology: ©1994 David Adler.hum_02.gif Introduction The genetic length of chromosome 2 spans ~237 Mb. It is ~8% of the whole human genetic material. The length of the short arm is ~89 Mb; the length of the long arm is 148 Mb. Chromosome 2 contains ~1500 genes. At least 200 of these genes are related to different kinds of genetic pathologies. Many of these genes are associated with structural defects of the organs, and others, to functional defects. The numerous structural abnormalities of chromosome 2 had already been reported before methods of molecular genetics gained wide usage. Currently there are ~1,500 reports on patients with varying structural abnormalities of this chromosome, including ~1,000 reports on patients with deletions. Deletions have been reported in at least 10–15 patients for each segment of chromosome 2. There are ten known syndromes caused by deletions of chromosome 2, including three syndromes related to deletions of the short arm (p). Some of these syndromes have been known for many years; others (del 2p15p16.1, del 2q23q24, and del 2q32) have been delineated only in the last couple of years. Deletions of Chromosome 2 Different types of chromosome 2 deletions have been described in numerous publications and may be subdivided into 3 groups: • Deletions that are “harmless” variants (usually familial) • Unique deletions that have not been categorized as a syndrome yet • Deletions that are considered a syndrome Deletions of 2p Deletion of 2p15p16.1 This syndrome, first described in 2007, is rare; only ten patienys have been described to date.
    [Show full text]
  • Detailed Genetic and Physical Map of the 3P Chromosome Region Surrounding the Familial Renal Cell Carcinoma Chromosome Translocation, T(3;8)(Pl4.2;Q24.1)1
    [CANCER RESEARCH 53. 3118-3124. July I. 1993] Detailed Genetic and Physical Map of the 3p Chromosome Region Surrounding the Familial Renal Cell Carcinoma Chromosome Translocation, t(3;8)(pl4.2;q24.1)1 Sal LaForgia,2 Jerzy Lasota, Parida Latif, Leslie Boghosian-Sell, Kumar Kastury, Masataka Olita, Teresa Druck, Lakshmi Atchison, Linda A. Cannizzaro, Gilad Barnea, Joseph Schlessinger, William Modi, Igor Kuzmin, Kaiman Tory, Berton Zbar, Carlo M. Croce, Michael Lerman, and Kay Huebner3 Jefferson Cancer Institute. Thomas Jefferson Medical College. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107 (S. L. J. L. L B-S.. K. K.. M. O.. T. D.. L A. C.. C. M. C.. K. H.I: Laboratory of Immunobiology. National Cancer Institute. Frederick Cancer Research and Development Center. Frederick. Maryland 21701 (F. L, l. K.. K. T.. B. Z.. M. L): Biological Carcinogenesis and Development Program. Program Resources Inc./Dyn Corp.. Frederick Cancer Research and Development Center. Frederick. Maryland 21701 1W. M.Õ: Chestnut Hill College. Philadelphia. Pennsylvania 19118 (L A.): and Department oj Pharmacology. New York University. New York. New York 10012 (G. B., J. S.I ABSTRACT location of the critical 3p region(s) harboring the target gene(s) had been hampered by the paucity of well-localized, widely available Extensive studies of loss of heterozygosity of 3p markers in renal cell molecular probes. Recently, efforts to isolate and localize large num carcinomas (RCCs) have established that there are at least three regions bers of 3p molecular probes have been undertaken (25-28). As the critical in kidney tumorigenesis, one most likely coincident with the von Hippel-Lindau gene at 3p25.3, one in 3p21 which may also be critical in probe density on 3p increased, in parallel with recent LOH studies, it small cell lung carcinomas, and one in 3pl3-pl4.2, a region which includes became clear that multiple independent loci on 3p were involved the 3p chromosome translocation break of familial RCC with the t(3;8)- (summarized in Refs.
    [Show full text]