DOCSLIB.ORG

Lafayette Reservoir Watershed

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

East Bay Watershed Master Plan 2016 EAST BAY WATERSHED MASTER PLAN UPDATE East Bay Municipal Utility District Board of Directors Frank Mellon President William B. Patterson Vice President John A. Coleman Andy Katz Doug Linney Lesa R. McIntosh Marguerite Young District Personnel Alexander R. Coate General Manager Richard G. Sykes Director of Water and Natural Resources Douglas I. Wallace Environmental Affairs Officer, Master Plan Update Project Manager Scott D. Hill Manager of Watershed and Recreation Jose D. Setka Manager of Fisheries and Wildlife Rick Leong Principal Management Analyst Rachel R. Jones Office of General Counsel East Bay Watershed Master Plan Prepared by: East Bay Municipal Utility District 375 - 11th Street Oakland, CA 94607 510-287-1370 Contact: Douglas I. Wallace February 29, 1996 Revised March 15, 1999 Updated Month, 2016 This document should be cited as: East Bay Municipal Utility District. 1996. East Bay Watershed Master Plan. February 29, 1996. Revised March 15, 1999. Updated [July] 2016. With technical assistance from Jones & Stokes Associates; Brady and Associates; Dillingham Associates; REM & Associates; Merritt Smith Consulting; Reza Ghezelbash, GIS Consultant; and Montgomery Watson. (JSA 94-320.) Oakland, CA. Table of Contents Section 1 Introduction 1 Purpose of the East Bay Watershed Master Plan . .1 Plan Terminology . .3 Board of Directors’ Policy Direction. 4 History of East Bay Watershed Land Use Planning. 5 Scope of the East Bay Watershed Master Plan . .5 Public Involvement. 5 Organization and Use of the Plan. 6 Section 2 District Lands and Resources 9 Introduction . .9 Overview of District Lands . .9 General Description of Watershed Lands. 11 District-Owned Nonreservoir Watershed Lands . 13 Description of Watershed Resources. 14 Description of Watershed Planning Zones . 29 Section 3 General Management Direction 45 Introduction . 45 Natural Resources Management Programs . 46 Water Quality 46 Biodiversity 50 Forestry 53 Livestock Grazing 55 Fire and Fuels 57 Community Use Management Programs. 64 Developed Recreation and Trails 64 Environmental Education 70 Cultural Resources 72 Visual Resources 73 Property Management Programs . 75 Land Ownership 75 Entitlements 77 Section 4 Watershed Management Area Direction 79 Introduction . 79 San Pablo Reservoir Watershed . 81 Briones Watershed. 84 Upper San Leandro Reservoir Watershed. 86 Chabot Reservoir Watershed. 88 Lafayette Reservoir Watershed. 90 Pinole Watershed. 92 i v Table of Contents Section 5 Management Direction for Interjurisdictional Coordination 95 Introduction . 95 Major Management Issues. 98 Summary of Land Use Conditions on Adjacent Lands. 98 General Management Direction . 105 Area-Specific Management Direction. 106 Section 6 Citations 109 viii LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ADA Americans with Disabilities Act AUMs animal unit-months BHAPA Briones Hills Agricultural Preservation Area BMP best management practice Board East Bay Municipal Utility District Board of Directors CAC Community Advisory Committee Caltrans California Department of Transportation CCCFPD Contra Costa County Fire Protection District Cal Fire California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CDFW California Department of Fish and Wildlife DBPs disinfection byproducts District East Bay Municipal Utility District EBRPD East Bay Regional Park District EBWMP East Bay Watershed Master Plan EIR environmental impact report FMU fire management unit GIS geographic information system HCP Habitat Conservation Plan IPM integrated pest management ITP Incidental Take Permit PAHs polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons PCBs polychlorinated biphenyls TAC Trails Adjunct Committee THMs trihalomethanes USFWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service voCs volatile organic compounds iiivii viii Section 1 Introduction Purpose of the East Bay Watershed Master Plan The East Bay Municipal Utility District (District) owns and Because these lands have been largely protected from manages approximately 28,000 acres of land and water development and human disturbance, they support surface in the East Bay area (Figure 1-1). These lands important and high-quality habitats and resources for a surround five reservoirs (Briones, San Pablo, Upper San wide variety of plant and animal species. Leandro, Chabot, and Lafayette) and one basin area that does not contain a reservoir (Pinole Valley). The District’s The District has determined that managing lands and reservoirs store high-quality drinking water and emergency reservoirs to protect water quality and important, high-quality water supplies for approximately 1.4 million water users in biological resources can best be achieved by promoting Alameda and Contra Costa Counties. Protecting water biological diversity (biodiversity). Biodiversity is defined quality is primary in importance to the District. Additionally, here as “the variety and variability among living organisms the District is committed to preserving and protecting the and the ecological complexes in which they occur” (Office natural resources that exist on its lands and its reservoirs. of Technology Assessment 1987). Focus of the East Bay Watershed Master Plan Natural Resource Management Programs Water Quality Biodiversity Forestry Livestock Grazing Fire & Fuels Community Use Management Programs Developed Environmental Cultural Visual Recreation Education Resources Resources & Trails Assets Management Programs Land Entitlements Ownership Section 1 Introduction 1 4 Pinole 80 Martinez 4 Hercules 242 680 El Sobrante b Richmond San Pablo Briones Res. Res. 680 Lafayette Walnut Creek 24 Lafayette Res. 680 Calde cot t Orinda 80 Corridor Berkeley 24 Moraga Calde cot t Tunnel 13 Oakland 580 0 10,000 20,000 Feet LEGEND District-Owned Property 580 Watershed Basin Boundaries Prepared by Jones & Stokes Associates, Inc. San Leandro Castro Valley Figure 1-1 | East Bay Municipal Utility District property boundary Section 1 Introduction 2 The purpose of the East Bay Watershed Master Plan The EBWMP provides clear guidance regarding the (EBWMP) is to provide long-term management direction management direction on East Bay watershed lands. It is for District-owned lands and reservoirs that will ensure the important to note that the EBWMP is not intended to protection of the District’s water resources and preserve require the implementation of any specific management environmental resources on District-owned lands. The actions and that approval of the plan by the Board of plan also identifies public uses considered compatible or Directors (Board) does not imply or create a future potentially compatible with the primary water quality and commitment to fund any programs or program elements. biodiversity goals. Implementation of such actions will be determined by the Board through the routine budgeting process. If funding is approved for a specific program or program element, the EBWMP will provide the direction on how that program or program element will be implemented. Plan Terminology For purposes of this plan, the term “watershed” is typically References to “non-District watershed lands” are to those used to describe District-owned lands that are the subject of lands that are tributary to District reservoirs and lands but the EBWMP. These areas include the: that are not owned by the District. When this document addresses the entire land area that is tributary to a District • San Pablo Reservoir watershed, reservoir, including both District-owned and non-District- owned lands, the terms “hydrologic watershed” and “basin” • Briones Reservoir watershed, are used. • Pinole watershed,* • Lafayette Reservoir watershed, • Upper San Leandro Reservoir watershed, and • Chabot Reservoir watershed. *District-owned nonreservoir watershed (see page 13 for further description) Section 1 Introduction 3 Board of Directors’ Policy Direction The mission statement of the District represents general management guidance regarding all lands and reservoirs owned by the District. The guiding principles, developed from the mission statement, have provided direction for the master planning process. Mission Statement In 1992, the Board adopted the following District mission statement for management of lands and resources: To manage the natural resouces Implicit in the District’s mission statement is the with which the District is entrusted, commitment to exercise responsible financial management, to provide high-quality water and ensure fair rates and charges, provide responsive customer service, and promote environmental responsibility. wastewater services for the people of the The EBWMP reflects the District’s mission by using it as East Bay, and to preserve and protect the the basis for a plan that protects reservoir water quality for environment for future generations. future generations through prudent management of District watershed natural resources. Guiding Principles In 1993, the District’s Board provided seven guiding principles for the EBWMP. These principles guided an integrated planning process that resulted in the adoption of the first EBWMP in 1996. In adopting the update to this plan in 2016, the Board reaffirmed the guiding principles as follows: 1. Protect water quality through sensitive natural resource and recreation management. 2. Ensure protection of the natural, cultural, and historical resources of the watershed on a long- term basis. 3. Respect natural resources; sustain and restore populations of native plants and animals and their environments. 4. Provide for appropriate
Recommended publications
  • Notice of Special Meeting

    Notice of Special Meeting

    BOARD OF DIRECTORS EAST BAY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT 375 - 11th Street, Oakland, CA 94607 Office of the Secretary: (510) 287-0440 Notice of Special Meeting FY22 and FY23 Budget Workshop #2 Tuesday, March 23, 2021 9:00 a.m. **Virtual** At the call of President Doug A. Linney, the Board of Directors has scheduled a Budget Workshop for 9:00 a.m. on Tuesday, March 23, 2021. Due to COVID-19 and in accordance with the most recent Alameda County Health Order, and with the Governor’s Executive Order N-29-20 which suspends portions of the Brown Act, this meeting will be conducted by webinar or teleconference only. In compliance with said orders, a physical location will not be provided for this meeting. These measures will only apply during the period in which state or local public health officials have imposed or recommended social distancing. The Board will meet in workshop session to review the proposed Fiscal Year 2022 (FY22) and Fiscal Year 2023 biennial budget, rates, operating and capital priorities, and staffing; the proposed FY22 System Capacity Charge and FY22 Wastewater Capacity Fee; and will receive follow-up information from the January 26, 2021 Budget Workshop #1. Dated: March 18, 2021 _______________________________ Rischa S. Cole Secretary of the District W:\Board of Directors - Meeting Related Docs\Notices\Notices 2021\032321_FY22_FY23 Budget Workshop 2.docx This page is intentionally left blank. BOARD OF DIRECTORS EAST BAY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT 375 - 11th Street, Oakland, CA 94607 Office of the Secretary: (510) 287-0440 AGENDA Special Meeting FY22 and FY23 Budget Workshop #2 Tuesday, March 23, 2021 9:00 a.m.
  • Pinolecreeksedimentfinal

    Pinolecreeksedimentfinal

    Pinole Creek Watershed Sediment Source Assessment January 2005 Prepared by the San Francisco Estuary Institute for USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service and Contra Costa Resource Conservation District San Francisco Estuary Institute The Regional Watershed Program was founded in 1998 to assist local and regional environmental management and the public to understand, characterize and manage environmental resources in the watersheds of the Bay Area. Our intent is to help develop a regional picture of watershed condition and downstream effects through a solid foundation of literature review and peer- review, and the application of a range of science methodologies, empirical data collection and interpretation in watersheds around the Bay Area. Over this time period, the Regional Watershed Program has worked with Bay Area local government bodies, universities, government research organizations, Resource Conservation Districts (RCDs) and local community and environmental groups in the Counties of Marin, Sonoma, Napa, Solano, Contra Costa, Alameda, Santa Clara, San Mateo, and San Francisco. We have also fulfilled technical advisory roles for groups doing similar work outside the Bay Area. This report should be referenced as: Pearce, S., McKee, L., and Shonkoff, S., 2005. Pinole Creek Watershed Sediment Source Assessment. A technical report of the Regional Watershed Program, San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI), Oakland, California. SFEI Contribution no. 316, 102 pp. ii San Francisco Estuary Institute ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors gratefully
  • Birding Northern California by Jean Richmond

    Birding Northern California by Jean Richmond

    BIRDING NORTHERN CALIFORNIA Site Guides to 72 of the Best Birding Spots by Jean Richmond Written for Mt. Diablo Audubon Society 1985 Dedicated to my husband, Rich Cover drawing by Harry Adamson Sketches by Marv Reif Graphics by dk graphics © 1985, 2008 Mt. Diablo Audubon Society All rights reserved. This book may not be reproduced in whole or in part by any means without prior permission of MDAS. P.O. Box 53 Walnut Creek, California 94596 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction . How To Use This Guide .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. Birding Etiquette .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. Terminology. Park Information .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 5 One Last Word. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 5 Map Symbols Used. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 6 Acknowledgements .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 6 Map With Numerical Index To Guides .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 8 The Guides. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 10 Where The Birds Are. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 158 Recommended References .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 165 Index Of Birding Locations. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 166 5 6 Birding Northern California This book is a guide to many birding areas in northern California, primarily within 100 miles of the San Francisco Bay Area and easily birded on a one-day outing. Also included are several favorite spots which local birders
  • Contra Costa County

    Contra Costa County

    Historical Distribution and Current Status of Steelhead/Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in Streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California Robert A. Leidy, Environmental Protection Agency, San Francisco, CA Gordon S. Becker, Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration, Oakland, CA Brett N. Harvey, John Muir Institute of the Environment, University of California, Davis, CA This report should be cited as: Leidy, R.A., G.S. Becker, B.N. Harvey. 2005. Historical distribution and current status of steelhead/rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California. Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration, Oakland, CA. Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Marsh Creek Watershed Marsh Creek flows approximately 30 miles from the eastern slopes of Mt. Diablo to Suisun Bay in the northern San Francisco Estuary. Its watershed consists of about 100 square miles. The headwaters of Marsh Creek consist of numerous small, intermittent and perennial tributaries within the Black Hills. The creek drains to the northwest before abruptly turning east near Marsh Creek Springs. From Marsh Creek Springs, Marsh Creek flows in an easterly direction entering Marsh Creek Reservoir, constructed in the 1960s. The creek is largely channelized in the lower watershed, and includes a drop structure near the city of Brentwood that appears to be a complete passage barrier. Marsh Creek enters the Big Break area of the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta northeast of the city of Oakley. Marsh Creek No salmonids were observed by DFG during an April 1942 visual survey of Marsh Creek at two locations: 0.25 miles upstream from the mouth in a tidal reach, and in close proximity to a bridge four miles east of Byron (Curtis 1942).
  • Board Meeting Packet

    Board Meeting Packet

    June 1, 2021 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Board Meeting Packet SPECIAL NOTICE REGARDING PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AT THE EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING SCHEDULED FOR TUESDAY, JUNE 1, 2021 at 1:00 pm Pursuant to Governor Newsom’s Executive Order No. N-29-20 and the Alameda County Health Officer’s Shelter in Place Orders, the East Bay Regional Park District Headquarters will not be open to the public and the Board of Directors and staff will be participating in the Board meetings via phone/video conferencing. Members of the public can listen and view the meeting in the following way: Via the Park District’s live video stream which can be found at https://youtu.be/md2gdzkkvVg Public comments may be submitted one of three ways: 1. Via email to Yolande Barial Knight, Clerk of the Board, at [email protected]. Email must contain in the subject line public comments – not on the agenda or public comments – agenda item #. It is preferred that these written comments be submitted by Monday, May 31, 2021 at 3:00 pm. 2. Via voicemail at (510) 544-2016. The caller must start the message by stating public comments – not on the agenda or public comments – agenda item # followed by their name and place of residence, followed by their comments. It is preferred that these voicemail comments be submitted by Monday, May 31, 2021 at 3:00 pm. 3. Live via zoom. If you would like to make a live public comment during the meeting this option is available through the virtual meeting platform: *Note: this virtual meeting platform link will let you into the https://zoom.us/j/94773173402 virtual meeting for the purpose of providing a public comment.
  • (Oncorhynchus Mykiss) in Streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California

    (Oncorhynchus Mykiss) in Streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California

    Historical Distribution and Current Status of Steelhead/Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in Streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California Robert A. Leidy, Environmental Protection Agency, San Francisco, CA Gordon S. Becker, Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration, Oakland, CA Brett N. Harvey, John Muir Institute of the Environment, University of California, Davis, CA This report should be cited as: Leidy, R.A., G.S. Becker, B.N. Harvey. 2005. Historical distribution and current status of steelhead/rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California. Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration, Oakland, CA. Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration TABLE OF CONTENTS Forward p. 3 Introduction p. 5 Methods p. 7 Determining Historical Distribution and Current Status; Information Presented in the Report; Table Headings and Terms Defined; Mapping Methods Contra Costa County p. 13 Marsh Creek Watershed; Mt. Diablo Creek Watershed; Walnut Creek Watershed; Rodeo Creek Watershed; Refugio Creek Watershed; Pinole Creek Watershed; Garrity Creek Watershed; San Pablo Creek Watershed; Wildcat Creek Watershed; Cerrito Creek Watershed Contra Costa County Maps: Historical Status, Current Status p. 39 Alameda County p. 45 Codornices Creek Watershed; Strawberry Creek Watershed; Temescal Creek Watershed; Glen Echo Creek Watershed; Sausal Creek Watershed; Peralta Creek Watershed; Lion Creek Watershed; Arroyo Viejo Watershed; San Leandro Creek Watershed; San Lorenzo Creek Watershed; Alameda Creek Watershed; Laguna Creek (Arroyo de la Laguna) Watershed Alameda County Maps: Historical Status, Current Status p. 91 Santa Clara County p. 97 Coyote Creek Watershed; Guadalupe River Watershed; San Tomas Aquino Creek/Saratoga Creek Watershed; Calabazas Creek Watershed; Stevens Creek Watershed; Permanente Creek Watershed; Adobe Creek Watershed; Matadero Creek/Barron Creek Watershed Santa Clara County Maps: Historical Status, Current Status p.
  • Notice of Location Change

    Notice of Location Change

    BOARD OF DIRECTORS EAST BAY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT 375 - 11th Street, Oakland, CA 94607 Office of the Secretary: (510) 287-0440 Notice of Location Change REGULAR CLOSED SESSION and REGULAR BUSINESS MEETINGS Tuesday, November 10, 2020 **Virtual** Notice is hereby given that due to COVID-19 and in accordance with the most recent Alameda County Health Order, and with the Governor’s Executive Order N-29-20 which suspends portions of the Brown Act, the Regular Closed Session Meeting scheduled for 11:00 a.m., and the Regular Business Meeting scheduled for 1:15 p.m., will be conducted via webinar and teleconference only. In compliance with said orders, a physical location will not be provided for these meetings. These measures will only apply during the period in which state or local public health officials have imposed or recommended social distancing. Dated: November 5, 2020 ________________________ Rischa S. Cole Secretary of the District W:\Board of Directors - Meeting Related Docs\Notices\Notices 2020\111020_regular meetings_location change.docx This page is intentionally left blank. BOARD OF DIRECTORS EAST BAY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT 375 - 11th Street, Oakland, CA 94607 Office of the Secretary: (510) 287-0440 AGENDA REGULAR CLOSED SESSION Tuesday, November 10, 2020 11:00 a.m. **Virtual** Location Due to COVID-19 and in accordance with the most recent Alameda County Health Order, and with the Governor’s Executive Order N-29-20 which suspends portions of the Brown Act, this meeting will be conducted by webinar and teleconference only. In compliance with said orders, a physical location will not be provided for this meeting.
  • March Program: Renewable Energy and Birds Garry George Meeting Schedule

    March Program: Renewable Energy and Birds Garry George Meeting Schedule

    Volume 61, Number 6 March 2016 March Program: Renewable Energy and Birds ✦ Garry George California became the epicenter of renewable energy Garry represents Audubon on many committees upon the passage of AB32 in 2006. Te CA Global Warming including the California Desert Renewable Energy Working Solutions Act ramped up Group, the Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan the transformation of an stakeholder process, and the Avian/Solar Working Group. energy sector that had He is a Board member of the American Wind and Wildlife contributed 60-80% of Institute and co-chair of their Research Committee. the emissions that cause He started his career at Audubon as a volunteer for Los climate change. Wind, Angeles Audubon after enjoying several field trips hosted by solar, and geothermal the chapter. He soon joined the Board projects had already been and was instrumental, with other operating in California, Board members, in transforming the but due to AB32 and our organization from a bird club with aggressive Renewable investments to a conservation and Above: Garry George (right) speaks P o r t f o l i o S t a n d a r d education powerhouse in LA. Te with Secretary of the Interior, Sally legislation, requiring Board asked him to become the first Jewell (center), and California Energy utilities to procure at Executive Director in 2003. He was Commissioner, Karen Douglas (left); least 33% of their energy soon elected by the Southern Right: Garry qdds to his birding Life List, Garry George photos from renewable sources California chapters to represent them by 2020, now escalated to on the Audubon California Board 50% by 2050 through SB350, we have seen wave after wave of from 2004-2008, and he began working for Audubon projects incentivized by tax credits, and political support for California in 2008.
  • 4.14-1 This Chapter Describes Potential

    4.14-1 This Chapter Describes Potential

    4.14 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS This chapter describes potential impacts from the proposed Project on utili- ties and services including sanitary wastewater, water supply, stormwater drainage, solid waste, and energy conservation. The following service provid- ers serve the Project site and surrounding area: Central Contra Costa Sani- tary District (wastewater), East Bay Municipal Utilities District (water), Cen- tral Contra Costa Solid Waste Authority (solid waste), and the Pacific Gas and Electric Company (electric and natural gas). Correspondence and infor- mation provided from these service providers are included in Appendix L of this Draft EIR. A. Wastewater The Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (CCCSD) provides wastewater collection and treatment service for the Project site. This section describes the existing conditions and potential impacts of the Project with regard to wastewater collection and treatment facilities. 1. Regulatory Framework a. Federal Regulations i. Clean Water Act The Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, more commonly known as the Clean Water Act (CWA), regulates the discharge of pollutants into wa- tersheds throughout the nation. Under the CWA, the United States Envi- ronmental Protection Agency (EPA) implements pollution control programs and sets wastewater standards. ii. National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) The National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit pro- gram was established in the Clean Water Act to regulate municipal and indus- trial discharges to
  • Regional in Nature March - April 2012 East Bay Regional Park District Activity Guide

    Regional in Nature March - April 2012 East Bay Regional Park District Activity Guide

    Regional in Nature March - April 2012 East Bay Regional Park District Activity Guide www.ebparks.org Spring is wildfl ower season in the parks. A fi eld of owl’s clover covers Round Valley Regional Preserve near Brentwood. Look Photo: Mark Crumpler Crumpler Mark Photo: inside for guided wildfl ower hikes in the Regional Parks. Inside: Junior Lifeguards • page 4 Park’n It Summer Day Camp • page 5 Pole Walking • page 6 Fire Making and Cord Making at Coyote Hills • page 11 Kayaking Big Break • page 14 Tips for Choosing a Summer Day Camp, see page 2. Contents Aquatics/Jr. Lifeguards .........4 Signifi cant Addition to Wildcat Recreation Programs ...... 5-6 Ardenwood ................. 6-7, 10 Canyon Regional Park Black Diamond ...............7, 10 BY GENERAL MANAGER ROBERT E. DOYLE Botanic Garden ..................10 Wildcat Canyon Regional Park, with Like adjacent Wildcat Canyon, this passed by voters in 2008 to help Coyote Hills ...................10-11 its majestic hills, ridges, and peaks, is recently acquired land contains secure open space. We are fortunate Crab Cove ......................11-12 growing. The East Bay Regional Park a mix of oak woodlands and grassland to have these funds at this time so we District Board of Directors recently providing a natural habitat to precious can act quickly to make bargain land Sunol ..................................... 12 approved the purchase of 362 acres wildlife. At Park District staff purchases. We are also fortunate Tilden Nature Area ...........12 adjacent to Wildcat Canyon, making it recommendation, much of the to work with a number of partner the largest parcel acquired by the Park property will be held in land bank agencies with similar visions to make Other Regional Parks ...12-14 District in west Contra Costa County status until it can be made safe our Regional Park system the fi nest Volunteer Programs ..........14 in 35 years.
  • Cemetery, Parks, & Recreation Services SOI Updates

    Cemetery, Parks, & Recreation Services SOI Updates

    April 21, 2010 (Agenda) Contra Costa Local Agency Formation Commission 651 Pine Street, Sixth Floor Martinez, CA 94553 Cemetery, Parks & Recreation Services Sphere of Influence Updates Dear Commissioners: SUMMARY In accordance with the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000 (CKH Act), LAFCO must adopt a sphere of influence (SOI) for each city and special district. The SOI serves as the ultimate planning boundary for a local agency. In accordance with the CKH Act, effective SOIs may discourage urban sprawl by preventing service duplications, overlapping service areas and premature conversion of agricultural and open space lands to urban uses. LAFCOs are mandated to review and update SOIs at least every five years, as necessary. In order to prepare and update the SOIs, LAFCO must prepare a municipal service review (MSR). Consultants and LAFCO staff are preparing the MSRs. The approach involves a combination of service-specific (countywide), sub-regional and agency-specific reviews. On February 10, 2010, the Commission held a workshop at which time the MSR consultants Jennifer Stephenson and Alex Hebert-Brown (Burr Consulting) presented an overview of the Cemetery, Parks & Recreation Services MSR. The report includes a review of services, recommended determinations, and governance and SOI options covering the following local agencies: Alamo Lafayette Cemetery District (ALCD), Byron Brentwood Knightsen Union Cemetery District (BBKUCD), Ambrose Recreation & Park District (ARPD), Pleasant Hill RPD (PHRPD), Rollingwood Wilart Park RPD (RWPRPD), and County Service Areas (CSAs) M-16, M-17, M-29, M-30, R-4, R-7, R-9, and R-10. At the workshop, Commissioners and local agency representatives provided input regarding the preliminary report.
  • General Plan Documents 10-1

    General Plan Documents 10-1

    10. SAFETY ELEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 10.1 INTRODUCTION 10-1 Legal Authority 10-1 10.2 RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER ELEMENTS 10-1 10.3 RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER GENERAL PLAN DOCUMENTS 10-1 10.4 GENERAL PUBLIC SAFETY ASSUMPTIONS 10-2 10.5 SAFETY ELEMENT ORGANIZATION 10-2 10.6 SEISMIC HAZARDS 10-3 Introduction 10-3 Issues 10-14 Goals 10-18 Policies 10-19 Implementation Measures 10-20 10.7 GROUND FAILURE AND LANDSLIDE HAZARDS 10-21 Introduction 10-21 Goals 10-23 Policies 10-23 Implementation Measures 10-26 10.8 FLOOD HAZARDS 10-26 Introduction 10-26 Goals 10-31 General Policies 10-31 Policies 10-32 Implementation Measures 10-33 10.9 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS USES 10-34 Introduction 10-34 Goals 10-39 Policies 10-39 Implementation Measures 10-40 10.10 WATER SUPPLY REQUIREMENTS 10-40 Introduction 10-40 Goals 10-40 Policies 10-40 Implementation Measures 10-41 10.11 PUBLIC PROTECTION SERVICES AND DISASTER PLANNING 10-42 Introduction 10-42 Goals 10-43 Policies 10-43 Implementation Measures 10-44 10-i 10. SAFETY ELEMENT 10.1 INTRODUCTION In accordance with the State General Plan Guidelines, the safety element includes maps of known hazards including seismic and other geologic hazards, and other hazards described below. It addresses evacuation routes; peak-load water supply requirements; and minimum road widths and clearances around structures, as they relate to identified fire and geologic hazards. Other locally relevant safety issues, including hazardous materials spills and water quality protection are also discussed in this element. The County Hazardous Waste Management Plan (HWMP) is incorporated herein by reference, and the goals and policies of the HWMP related to the Safety Element are stated in this section.