<<

J. Steinberger Nov. 2004 Review of Cold in Astrophysics. Content: Preliminaries: Einstein equation of Hubble expansion. Nucleo Synthesis. Formation of CDM “Halos” Galactic rotation curves. Measurement of Ωm using x-ray measurements of clusters. Measurement of Ωm using gravitational lensing. Why are hopeful candidates for CDM.

1. Astrophysical preliminaries; Einstein-Friedman equation for a homogeneous . Definition of Ωm . Metric of homogeneous universe. a is the scale, x, y and z are “comoving” coordinates, that is, they do not change with the expansion of the universe: ds2 = dt2 + a(t)2(dx2 + dy2 + dz2) Einstein (Friedmann) equation for homogeneous universe: H(t) ≡ ((da/dt)/a)2 = 8πG/3*ρ(t) + Λ , where H is the hubble expansion parameter, ρ is the energy density and Λ is the “cosmological constant”.

For relativistic matter, that is kT >> mc2, the variation of ρ with a is as a-4, 4 ρrad = ρrad,0(a0/a) . Subscript zero, here and in the following, refers to the present universe.

For nonrelativistic matter, that is kT << mc2, the variation of ρ with a is as a- 3 3 , ρm = ρm,0(a0/a) .

Only in recent times, that is for a0/a < ≈ 2, has the cosmological constant term become important; before it was negligible.

In the early universe the energy density was dominated by radiation, now it is dominated by non relativistic matter. After cold matter domination, 2 2 3 H(t) = H0 (Ωm(a0/a(t)) + ΩΛ); Ωm+ΩΛ = 1. Ωm is the sum of baryonic matter and cold dark matter: Ωm = Ωb + Ωcdm. Present best values: Ωb = .045 +/- .002, Ωm = Ωb + Ωcdm = .26 +/-.015. ΩΛ = .74 +/- .03.

2. Big Bang Nucleo Synthesis (BBNS). t =1 sec. to 3 minutes. “The first three minutes”. T=1 Mev – 10 KeV. Before one second, at temperatures above 1 MeV, neutrons and protons were in equilibrium with the photons, about 0.7 neutrons per proton, and did not combine to higher nuclei. As the temperature and density decreased, a) the neutrinos dropped out of equilibrium, and therefore the neutrons decayed, with mean life ~ 900 seconds, and b) protons and neutrons combined to form deuterons, tritium, He3, He4 and Lithium7. The present abundances of these elements are function of the nuclear reaction rates, the photon energy density , the barium/photon ratio, as well as neutrino energy density, despite the fact that the neutrinos had decoupled, since the neutrino energy densities influences the rate of the Hubble expansion. This effect confirms that there are three neutrino families. The present observation of the relative abundances are the first observational verification of the Big Bang. They also yield the very important number, the number of barions relative to the number of photons, the so-called barion entropy: -10 η = nb/nγ = 6*10 . corresponding to Ωb = .04 (NB: The observation of the early abundances is complicated by subsequent nucleo synthesis in chemistry).

3. Formation of CDM “haloes” under gravity. It is assumed that since matter domination, CDM interactions other than gravity can be neglected. Following matter domination, the primordial inhomogeneities with scale greater than the horizon scale at radiation- matter equality. For inhomogeneities larger than the mean density of the universe ρc of the universe, the so called “non-linear” domain, characteristic of and other large scale structure, typically of the order of density ~ 1000 times ρc, the calculations are numerical simulations. The resultant evolution of the shapes and distributions of gas clouds, galaxies and galaxy clusters in the ΛCDM model, both in distribution and in shape, is beautifully in agreement with the observations. The typical halo is essentially independent of scale. It is roughly spherical, and has the shape (Navarro, 2 Frenk and White, ApJ 490, 493 (1997)): ρ(r) = c*ρc/((x(1+x) ), Here ρc is the “critical density” of the universe, 2 -29 3 ρc = H0 *8πGN/3 = 1.9*10 g/cm , x = r/rc, rc gives a measure of the size, and the magnitude c is typically of order 1000.

4. Galaxy Rotation Curves. These are measurements of the velocities of galactic objects around the centres of spiral galaxies, as function of the radius. They measure the mass M(r) included inside the radius, 2 v = M(r)GN/r. Typically they are measured using the Doppler shifts of the 21 cm hyperfine radiation of atomic hydrogen gas clouds, which represent a non negligible fraction of the galactic barion masses. They show that the dominant galactic gravitational mass distributions, especially at large distances, are much in excess of the masses represented by the galaxy’s luminous objects (), and is distributed out to larger radii. The rotation curves are among the earliest and most graphic evidence for dark matter.

5. Measurements of Ωm, using x-ray emission of galaxy clusters. These are the earliest quite accurate determinations of Ω. Galaxy clusters are groups of typically of the order of 1000 galaxies, with radius ~ 1 Mpc (1pc = 3light years, typical galactic radii are 50Kpc), and masses of 1015 solar masses (typical galaxies have ~ 1011 solar masses).

~85% of their baryonic content is in the form of ionised gas plasma, with typical temperatures ~ 2 – 8 KeV, emitting in the x-ray region. X-ray emission is due to bremsstrahlung in electron-electron collisions, and so proportional to the square of the optical depth of the electron density at the radius corresponding to a particular direction of view.

The baryonic plasma is, in reasonable approximation, in hydrostatic equilibrium with the gravitational potential. On the basis of the temperature and x-ray flux intensity, both as function of radius, the mass distribution and gas fraction, fgas = mgas/mmatter can be determined. Typically, fgas = 0.12. Then Ωm is obtained, using the BBNS determination of Ωb: Ωm = Ωb(BBNS)/(fgas/.85) = 0.3 +/- 0.06.

6. Ωm from CMBR. The very nearly uniform cosmic microwave background is a Planck spectrum of photons, last scattered when the baryonic plasma combined into neutral atoms, at a temperature of .25 eV (30000K), at the age of the universe 300,000 years (present age, 14 billion years). The present temperature, after 1100 fold expansion, is measured to be 2.730K, and provides a measure of the present photon number density, and so, given the BBNS barion-photon ratio, the present barion density.

The CMBR inhomogeneities ∆T/T, of order ~ 10-5, reflect the primordial inhomogeneities which, under the action of gravity, generate the present structure in the universe, galaxies etc. The essential information of the two dimensional angular map of ∆T/T is contained in the one dimensional “power spectrum” of (∆T/T)2, as function of the angular scale, l = π/θ. The originally essentially uniform primordial power spectrum as function of scale, at the time of photon , has evolved with the formation of peaks and valleys, due to the plasma oscillations produced under the action of the dark matter gravity and the photon pressure. Positions and magnitudes of the peaks and valleys permit a precise determination of several basic cosmological parameters, including Ωb = 0.05 +/- .003 and Ωm = 0.30 +/- 0.05

7. Gravitational lensing of distant objects by massif intermediate masses. Strong lensing, that is multiple image formation and formation of parts of Einstein rings of distant point sources, as well as “weak lensing” small elliptical deformation of hundreds of thousands of distant galaxies, have yielded basic confirmation of our ideas of CDM, but it is difficult to get very precise results.

8. Why are neutralinos attractive candidates for CDM? Assuming we know the mass, say mn = 200 GeV, we know, from Ωm = 0.3, the neutralino density, and so, the ration of neutralino to photon 0 3 2 -11 number, nn/nγ = (Ωmρc/mn)/(1.2(T=2.73 K)) /π ) = 8*10 .

Earlier, when kT >> mn, there were equal densities for all degrees of freedom, including the neutralinos, in equilibrium with photons and other particles.

As the temperature drops below mn, but as long as the density is still sufficiently large to maintain the neutralinos in equilibrium given their interaction crosssection, their density relative to the photons drops exponentially, as e-mn/T.

With further expansion of the universe, when the density has decreased such that the neutralino annihilation crosssection is no longer sufficient to cause a collision within the hubble time, as σvnnn becomes less than 1/H, the neutralinos decouple; their number no longer decreases.

The Susy weak annihilation crosssection is about right to give the presently observed CDM density. This gives good reason for hope that the Neutralino is in fact the CDM particle.