DOCSLIB.ORG

Asia Pacific Travel Trends 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Asia Pacific Travel Trends 2017 ASIA PACIFIC TRAVEL TRENDS 2017 Travel Habits, Behaviours, and Influencers of Chinese, Japanese, and Australian Travellers METHODOLOGY Data Collection Method ONLINE SURVEY Quantitative Survey Field Work 30 March – 7 April 2017 Qualifying Criteria Must have booked online travel in the past year Sample Size China: n=1000 Japan: n=1001 Australia: n=1000 Total: n=3001 2 LAST TRIP LOOK BACK BY COUNTRY NUMBER OF Number of Trips Taken in the Past Year TRIPS PER YEAR VARIES SIGNIFICANTLY 5.3 4.4 BETWEEN 4.3 THE THREE 3.3 COUNTRIES The Chinese know how to travel, taking the most amount of trips per year TOTAL China Japan Australia 4 Trips in the Past Year TRAVELLERS FROM ALL THREE 5.3 COUNTRIES TAKE, ON 4.4 AVERAGE, MORE 3.3 3.1 3.2 THAN 4 TRIPS A YEAR 2.5 2.1 The Japanese and Chinese take roughly the 1.4 same amount of personal trips 0.8 The Chinese take the most business trips Total Business Personal Notable Country Difference China Japan Australia Q9: Typically, how many personal/leisure and business trips do you take per year? Q10: What types of vacations have you taken in the past year? 5 Total (n=3001) China(n=1000) Japan (n=1001) Australia (n=1000) TIME SPENT ON Time Spent on Vacation VACATION for THE THREE 10.6 COUNTRIES 6.7 ALSO VARIES 6.3 WIDELY 3.4 Australians take the longest trips by far The Japanese take the shortest vacations TOTAL China Japan Australia 6 27% 14% AUSTRALIANS TRAVELLERS ARE THE MOST LIKELY TO TRAVEL INTERNATIONALLY 73% 86% The Japanese are the most likely to travel domestically 45% 29% In general, the three countries in this region show a preference to travelling TOTAL domestically with Australians travelling the most internationally 55% 71% 7 In my country Outside my country THE TYPE OF VACATION VARIES FOR ALL THREE COUNTRIES OVER THE PAST YEAR CHINESE: seek relaxing trips but they also enjoy JAPANESE: love to sightsee and they also AUSTRALIANS: visit their family members more sightseeing, bleisure, and family play trips show a strong preference for stay-cations often, followed closely by relaxing and sightseeing 74% 62% 61% 49% 42% 44% 43% 29% 35% 20% 26% 20% 9% 9% 11% Relaxing Sight-seeing Bleisure Family Play Romantic Getaway 51% 54% 28% 31% 25% 24% 19% 19% 18% 22% 11% 10% 16% 13% 11% 0% 3% 6% Party Activity based Visiting Family Special Event Stay-cation Other China Japan Australia Q9: Typically, how many personal/leisure and business trips do you take per year? Q10: What types of vacations have you taken in the past year? 8 Total (n=3001) China(n=1000) Japan (n=1001) Australia (n=1000) TRAVELLERS IN ALL THREE COUNTRIES TRAVELLED BY PLANE TO GET TO THEIR DESTINATION Australians are the most likely to The Japanese are the most likely to travel by car and train travel by plane and use all three travel methods fairly evenly How did you get to your destination? 66% 72% 37% 31% 21% 20% 25% 9% 1% Plane Car Ride Train Ride China Japan Australia Notable Country Difference Q9: Typically, how many personal/leisure and business trips do you take per year? Q10: What types of vacations have you taken in the past year? 9 Total (n=3001) China(n=1000) Japan (n=1001) Australia (n=1000) HOTELS ARE THE MOST POPULAR PLACE TO STAY ACROSS ALL THREE COUNTRIES JAPANESE: prefer staying in hotels CHINESE: prefer hotels, though not quite as AUSTRALIANS: prefer hotels, but they also stay strongly as the Japanese with family and friends 90% 75% 50% 20% 11% 12% 6% 6% 5% 5% 7% 6% 2% 0% 3% 0% 0% 2% Hotel Resort Home sharing With family/friends Cruise Other (HomeAway, Airbnb, VRBO) China Japan Australia Notable Country Difference Q15. How long w as your vacation? Q16. How did you get to your destination? 10 Q17. Where did you stay on your last trip? Total (n=3001) China(n=1000) Japan (n=1001) Australia (n=1000) WHEN ASKED ABOUT INTERNATIONAL OR DOMESTIC TRAVEL, HERE’S HOW THEY RESPONDED CHINESE: prefer domestic travel by just under JAPANESE: are the least likely to travel AUSTRALIANS: prefer domestic travel with just three quarters internationally under half leaving the country 14% 27% 45% Outside my Country Outside my Country Outside my Country Q13. What type of vacation did you last book online? Q14. Was the trip….? 11 Total (n=3001) China(n=1000) Japan (n=1001) Australia (n=1000) WHEN ASKED ABOUT THE TYPE OF VACATION THEY LAST BOOKED ONLINE, HERE’S HOW THEY RESPONDED The Japanese and Chinese stayed in their country and took Australians vacation domestically and nearly a quarter take relaxing (China) or sight-seeing (Japan) vacations vacation to visit family 39% 34% 24% 20% 19% 14% 17% 16% 7% 6% 5% 6% 4% 4% 4% Relaxing Sight-seeing Family Play Romantic Getaway Party 24% 10% 4% 5% 4% 4% 7% 4% 2% 2% 3% 3% 2% 1% 2% 2% 0 3% Bleisure Visiting Family Activity based Special Event Stay-cation Other China Japan Australia Notable Country Difference Q13. What type of vacation did you last book online? Q14. Was the trip….? 12 Total (n=3001) China(n=1000) Japan (n=1001) Australia (n=1000) 81% 71% BUDGET WAS A 64% PRIMARY FACTOR FOR TRAVELLERS IN ALL THREE Yes No Yes No Yes No COUNTIES WHEN BOOKING THEIR Proportion Spent On Proportion Spent On Proportion Spent On LAST TRIP Hotel 18% Hotel 34% Flight 25% Food 16% Food 17% Hotel 23% CHINESE: were the most likely to consider budget on Shopping 16% Flight 14% Food 16% their last trip Flight 15% Transportation 14% Transportation 9% Attractions/Tour Attractions/Tours 15% Shopping 11% 9% JAPANESE: spent a much larger portion of their budget s Attractions/Tour on the hotel than Chinese or Australian travellers Transportation 11% 6% Shopping 9% s Home sharing 5% Other 3% Other 5% AUSTRALIANS: budget more for flights than travellers 4% from the other two countries Other Home sharing 1% Home sharing 4% Q18. Was budget a primary factor w hen you were researching/ booking your last trip? 13 Q19. How much total did you spend on your last trip, including flight, hotel, transportation, food, shopping, tours etc.? Q20. What proportion of your travel budget did you spend on each of the follow ing? Total (n=3001) China(n=1000) Japan (n=1001) Australia (n=1000) WHY THEY CHOOSE DESTINATIONS ALTHOUGH CHINESE TRAVELLERS SAY THEY ARE LOOKING FOR DEALS, FEELING PAMPERED, ACTIVITIES, AND EXPERIENCES ARE SIGNIFICANTLY MORE IMPORTANT Feeling pampered during my vacation 170 Activities I will be doing on my trip 169 A once in a lifetime experience 158 A place where I can vacation with friends 155 My food experience 149 The cultural experience 145 Taking memorable pictures 136 Outdoor activities 121 Somewhere unique that will produce shareable photos 119 A place that is kid friendly 110 Recommendations from family & friends 109 Professional reviews 85 Deals and/or special offers 76 Lowest Price 65 Based on ranking of most/least important considerations in choosing last trip using rotations of considerations and Max-Diff Scaling. 15 JAPANESE TRAVELLERS PLACE THE HIGHEST IMPORTANCE ON THEIR FOOD EXPERIENCE, AS WELL AS LOWEST PRICE WHEN PLANNING A TRIP My food experience 202 Lowest Price 184 Activities I will be doing on my trip 142 Transportation available on the trip 142 A place where I can vacation with friends 136 Feeling pampered during my vacation 133 The cultural experience 124 Deals and/or special offers 116 Recommendations from family & friends 109 Taking memorable pictures 106 Flight time 103 Shopping experience 100 Professional reviews 99 Online reviews from other travelers 96 Based on ranking of most/least important considerations in choosing last trip using rotations of considerations and Max-Diff Scaling. 16 ACTIVITIES LEAD THE WAY IN TERMS OF IMPORTANCE FOR AUSTRALIAN TRAVELLERS, WHILE PRICE AND DEALS FOLLOW CLOSELY BEHIND Activities I will be doing on my trip 197 Lowest Price 167 Deals and/or special offers 164 A once in a lifetime experience 150 The cultural experience 143 Taking memorable pictures 125 My food experience 121 A place where I can vacation with friends 121 Outdoor activities 117 Transportation available on the trip 105 Recommendations from family & friends 102 Somewhere unique that will produce shareable photos 89 Feeling pampered during my vacation 87 Online reviews from other travelers 81 Based on ranking of most/least important considerations in choosing last trip using rotations of considerations and Max-Diff Scaling. 17 DETERMINING FACTORS FOR CHOOSING A DESTINATION CHINESE: look to reviews and informative content JAPANESE: show a strong preference for deals AUSTRALIANS: pay close attention to deals before making that features deals before making decisions and informative content as significant influencers a decision and they like informative reviews of places (% of TRAVELLERS Who Somewhat Agree/Strongly Agree With The Statement) 92% 91% 88% 88% 78% 76% 80% 66% 56% I read reviews of places I want to visit from sites like TripAdvisor Informative content from destinations and/or travel brands I look for deals before making a decision before making my final decision can influence my decision making process 88% 82% 70% 76% 53% 55% 43% 45% 49% I talk to people who have visited the place before making a I use loyalty programs in my decision making process Ads can be influential in my decision making process decision China Japan Australia Q32. Please select to w hat extent you agree w ith the follow ing statements. (Please select one for each statement) Q33.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2018-Annual-Report-(Final).Pdf
    TM 2018 ANNUAL REPORT TM TM TM BOARD OF DIRECTORS OFFICERS STOCKHOLDER INFORMATION Annual Meeting Barry Diller Barry Diller Chairman and Senior Executive Expedia Chairman and Senior Executive The annual meeting of stockholders Group, Inc. and IAC/InterActiveCorp will be held via audio webcast on Peter M. Kern December 3, 2019 at 10:30 a.m. Peter M. Kern Vice Chairman Eastern Time Vice Chairman Online audio webcast: Expedia Group, Inc. Mark D. Okerstrom www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ Chief Executive Officer EXPE2019 Samuel Altman and President Chief Executive Officer Stock Market Listing Open AI Alan R. Pickerill Expedia Group, Inc.’s common stock Executive Vice President and is traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Susan C. Athey Chief Financial Officer Market under the symbol “EXPE.” Economics of Technology Professor Stanford Graduate School of Business Robert J. Dzielak Registrar and Transfer Agent Chief Legal Officer and Secretary Computershare A. George (Skip) Battle Stockholder correspondence should Chairman Lance A. Soliday be mailed to: Fair Isaac Corporation Senior Vice President, Computershare Chief Accounting Officer P.O. Box 505000 Chelsea Clinton and Controller Louisville, KY 40233 Vice Chair Clinton Foundation Overnight correspondence should be mailed to: Craig A. Jacobson Computershare Partner 462 South 4th Street Suite 1600 Hansen, Jacobson, Teller, Hoberman, Louisville, KY 40202 Newman, Warren, Richman, Rush, Kaller & Gellman, L.L.P. Computershare stockholder website: https://www-us.computershare.com/- Victor A. Kaufman investor Vice Chairman IAC/InterActiveCorp Computershare stockholder online inquiries: Dara Khosrowshahi https://www-us.computershare.com/- Bringing the world Chief Executive Officer Investor/Contact Uber Technologies, Inc. Computershare within reach Mark D.
    [Show full text]
  • Influencers Throughout the Travel Booking Path to Purchase
    Traveler’s PATH TO PURCHASE METHODOLOGY ▶ Expedia Media Solutions commissioned comScore to conduct a study on travel path to purchase in the United Kingdom, United States and Canada ▶ comScore blended online travel behavioral data with data collected through a custom survey Custom Survey Qualifications Behavioral Data Sources • Age 18+ • comScore PC Panel (2MM devices worldwide) • Live in UK, US or Canada (each country required • comScore Mobile Panel (20,000 devices) For each market being analyzed) • comScore Multi-PlatForm • Booked travel online within the past 6 months • comScore Census Tags (>1.5 trillion events monthly) • Survey yielded: • United Kingdom: 817 total completes • United States: 805 total completes Survey Statistical Reliability • Canada: 815 total completes • A sample oF 800 is reliable within ±3.5% points at a • Fielding dates: March 14 – 23, 2016 95% conFidence interval • A sample oF 500 is reliable within ±4.4% points at a 95% conFidence interval 2 DIGITAL TRAVEL CONTENT CONSUMPTION TRENDS 3 50 MILLION 258 MILLION 30 MILLION DIGITAL UK USERS DIGITAL US USERS DIGITAL CANADA CONSUMING CONSUMING USERS CONSUMING 239 BILLION 1.5 TRILLION 148 BILLION DIGITAL MINUTES DIGITAL MINUTES DIGITAL MINUTES EACH MONTH EACH MONTH EACH MONTH Data Source: comScore Media Metrix Multi-PlatForm Reporting, April 2016 data, Unique Visitors & Total Minutes. 4 75% MORE THAN 70% DIGITAL UK USERS 60% DIGITAL CANADIAN CONSUME TRAVEL DIGITAL US USERS USERS CONSUME CONTENT CONSUME TRAVEL TRAVEL CONTENT CONTENT Data Source: comScore Media Metrix Multi-PlatForm Media Trend Reporting, UK, US, CA, January 2015 – April 2016 data, Total Minutes. 5 2.4 BILLION 8.7 BILLION 806 MILLION MINUTES MINUTES MINUTES SPENT ON DIGITAL SPENT ON DIGITAL SPENT ON DIGITAL TRAVEL CONTENT TRAVEL CONTENT TRAVEL CONTENT IN THE UK IN THE US IN CANADA 44% INCREASE 41% INCREASE 18% INCREASE YEAR OVER YEAR YEAR OVER YEAR YEAR OVER YEAR Data Source: comScore Media Metrix Multi-PlatForm Media Trend Reporting, UK, US, CA, January 2015 – April 2016 data, Total Minutes.
    [Show full text]
  • Kayak Puts Travel in the Spotlight with Dropbox for Business
    Case Study Kayak puts travel in the spotlight with Dropbox for Business Kayak is a travel website that was co-founded by Expedia, Travelocity, and Orbitz to provide one convenient place for consumers to get the widest range of choices in flights, hotels, rental cars, and other travel deals. Results from hundreds of travel sites can be compared in one comprehensive, intuitive display at kayak.com. Paddling Upstream Organization: Kayak With a vast inventory of continually changing travel options and opportunities, the Requirements content on Kayak’s website is in perpetual motion. Dozens of employees on the • A simple-to-navigate file product development team work to keep the site up-to-date so that users have the storage repository most seamless experience possible. Product designs are updated regularly as they • Freedom from complicated pass through the hands of designers, product managers, and developers on sharing processes the team. • File editing without uploads Initially, the company tried to use a server to support this cycle, but according to and downloads Bill O’Donnell, Chief Architect and SVP of Mobile Products for Kayak, “The VPN was slow, difficult to connect to, and, frankly, just a pain in the neck.” Kayak’s Linux server Solution: Dropbox for Business wasn’t right, as it didn’t allow files to be easily edited, organized, and reloaded. O’Donnell adds, “We have an enormous website filled with manually created files. Results Over time, we’ve ended up with hundreds of thousands of designs on the server that • Improved organization of files are hard to navigate through, because you can’t sort or search through them.” • Shorter, more seamless project cycles “Dropbox for Business gives us a secure, unified place • Significant reductions in to store all of our work, and helps reverse the friction workflow friction that can come with having hundreds of computers in one company.” Bill O’Donnell, Chief Architect and SVP of Mobile Products, Kayak The company needed a simple solution that would let team members access and update files without friction.
    [Show full text]
  • View PDF Document
    OIG COMMENTS ON DOT STUDY OF AIR TRAVEL SERVICES Office of the Secretary Number: CC-2002-061 Date Issued: December 13, 2002 Memorandum U.S. Department of Transportation Office of the Secretary of Transportation Office of Inspector General Subject: INFORMATION: OIG Comments on DOT Study Date: December 13, 2002 of Air Travel Services, Office of the Secretary CC-2002-061 From: Kenneth M. Mead Reply to Attn. of: JA-50 Inspector General To: The Secretary The Deputy Secretary This report presents the results of our review of the Department of Transportation (Department) Study of Air Travel Services. On June 27, 2002, the Office of Aviation and International Affairs issued a report to Congress on its efforts to monitor air travel services related to Orbitz. The Office of Inspector General (OIG) was directed by the House and Senate Transportation Appropriations Subcommittees in the Conference Committee Report on the DOT Appropriations bill for Fiscal Year (FY) 20021 to evaluate and comment on the Department’s findings. We have reviewed the Department’s report and evaluated the reasonableness and accuracy of the Department’s analysis and conclusions. We selectively verified data cited in the report to the information submitted to the Department by Orbitz’ airline-owners, Charter and non-Charter Associates,2 Global Distribution Systems (GDSs), and online travel agencies. In addition, we held discussions with and reviewed supplemental data submitted by online and brick-and-mortar travel agencies, Department officials, GDSs, and large and small carriers. We also conducted tests of online travel agencies to determine the validity of some of the claims Orbitz’ critics have made.
    [Show full text]
  • Deal of the Week: Expedia to Buy Orbitz for $1.38B
    Deal of the Week: Expedia to buy Orbitz for $1.38B Announcement Date February 12, 2015 Acquirer Expedia Inc. (Nasdaq: EXPE) Acquirer Description Operates as an online travel company in the United States and internationally. Brands include Expedia.com, Hotels.com, Hotwire.com, Classic Vacations and Travelocity Founded in 1996 and headquartered in Bellevue, Washington Acquirer Financial Mkt Cap: $11.7 billion LTM EBITDA: $752.4 million Statistics EV: $11.3 billion LTM EV / Revenue: 1.9x LTM Revenue: $5.8 billion LTM EV / EBITDA: 15.1x Target Company Orbitz Worldwide (NYSE: OWW) Target Description Operates as an online travel company worldwide. Brand portfolio includes Orbitz and CheapTickets in the United States; ebookers in Europe; and HotelClub and RatesToGo internationally Founded in 2000 and headquartered in Chicago, Illinois Target Financial Mkt Cap: $1.3 billion LTM EBITDA: $139.2 million Statistics EV: $1.6 billion LTM EV / Revenue: 1.7x LTM Revenue: $932.0 million LTM EV / EBITDA: 11.2x Price / Consideration Price: $1.38 billion Consideration: Cash Target Advisor Qatalyst Partners Rationale Expedia said it expects the Orbitz deal, which has an enterprise value of $1.6 billion, to add 75 cents to earnings and generate cost savings of $75 million Acquiring Orbitz will bring not only that company’s namesake brand but also CheapTickets and HotelClub, as well as the corporate travel site Orbitz for Business “We are attracted to the Orbitz Worldwide business because of its strong brands and impressive team,” said
    [Show full text]
  • The Power of Ranking: Quantifying the Effects of Rankings on Online Consumer Search and Choice∗
    The Power of Ranking: Quantifying the Effects of Rankings on Online Consumer Search and Choice∗ Raluca M. Ursu† Current version: May, 2015 PRELIMINARY AND INCOMPLETE PLEASE DO NOT CITE OR CIRCULATE WITHOUT THE AUTHOR’S PERMISSION Abstract When consumers face many options, intermediaries can help by ranking them, which in turn can influence how consumers search and what they ultimately purchase. To understand such influence, it is crucial to separate the role the ranking plays in consumer choices from other characteristics of the firm. As the ranking is endogenous, separately identifying the role of the ranking is challenging. In this paper, I identify the causal effect of rankings by using a data set on hotel searches that includes both a random ranking and the default ranking of a popular online travel agent. I show that rankings affect both clicks and purchases, but that conditional on a click, consumers do not derive any additional utility from purchasing from a higher ranked hotel. In addition, the data permits testing two common modeling assumptions found in the literature: that position mainly affects search costs and that consumer search sequentially, both of which are supported by the data. To quantify the effect of rankings on consumer choices, I estimate a sequential search model that accounts for the order in which consumers search. This model reveals that search cost estimates ignoring the endogeneity bias of position are upward biased. Using this model’s search and preference parameter estimates, I construct several counterfactuals of interest comparing the value of the default ranking with the optimal ranking for consumers, hotels and the intermediary.
    [Show full text]
  • Termination of Airline Computer Reservation System Rules
    The Economics of Regulatory Reform: Termination of Airline Computer Reservation System Rules Cindy R. AlexandertA tt Yoon-Ho Alex Lee The Department of Transportation's announced plan to terminate all federal regulation of airline computer reservation systems (CRS) in 2004 is somewhat surprisingin light of modern economic theories of regulation that highlight barriers to reform. This Article presents evidence on how CRS regulation affects the market for CRS servicesfrom the perspectives of both traditional and modern theories of regulation. We conclude that the announcement of a plan to terminate CRS regulations is consistent with traditional theories of regulation in which the government acts to maximize social welfare. We also demonstrate that the traditional approach to evaluating the merits of regulation, as sometimes applied, exhibits a bias toward rule retention by assuming that the relevant alternative to regulation is a state of laissez-faire. In fact, the relevant alternative is typically otherforms of intervention by the government, such as antitrust enforcement, which poses as the government's strategic alternative for most if not all prior DOT regulation of CRS markets. Finally, we examine the practical relevance of modern theories of regulation for explaining the recent move towards deregulation. The occurrence of entry and technological change priorto CRS deregulationis of special interest from this perspective. The termination of CRS regulations is indeed consistent both with the traditional theory of deregulation in the public interest and with the modern interest group theory of deregulation in which deregulation is the ultimate conclusion of a process. Other modern theories of regulation appear not to explain the timing of reform in this instance.
    [Show full text]
  • Expedia Buys Travelocity for $280 Million 23 January 2015
    Expedia buys Travelocity for $280 million 23 January 2015 Expedia said Friday it is buying rival Travelocity in a $280 million deal merging two of the largest online travel operators. The all-cash deal calls for Expedia to acquire its rival from travel software firm Sabre Corp and follows a 2013 agreement in which Expedia powered the tech platform for Travelocity's US and Canadian websites. "Travelocity is one of the most recognized travel brands in North America, offering thousands of travel destinations to more than 20 million travelers per month," said Expedia president and chief executive Dara Khosrowshahi. "The strategic marketing agreement we've had in place has been a marriage of Travelocity's strong brand with our best-in-class booking platform, supply base, and customer service," he said. "Evolving this relationship strengthens the Expedia family's ability to continue to innovate and deliver the very best travel experiences to the widest set of travelers, all over the world," Khosrowshahi added. The move comes amid increased competition in the travel sector from websites such as Priceline- owned Kayak and others which scan the Internet for the best deals. Expedia operators other travel sites including Hotels.com and Carrentals.com. Sabre, which manages online reservations for airlines and hotels. last year decided to focus on software and services, and sold another travel website lastminute.com. © 2015 AFP APA citation: Expedia buys Travelocity for $280 million (2015, January 23) retrieved 1 October 2021 from https://phys.org/news/2015-01-expedia-travelocity-million.html This document is subject to copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Expedia, Inc. Reports Third Quarter 2017 Results Healthy Room Night Growth Partly Offset by Natural Disasters, Trivago
    Expedia, Inc. Reports Third Quarter 2017 Results Healthy room night growth partly offset by natural disasters, trivago BELLEVUE, WA – October 26, 2017 – Expedia, Inc. (NASDAQ: EXPE) announced financial results today for the third quarter ended September 30, 2017. Key Highlights • Gross bookings, including HomeAway, increased $2.2 billion or 11% year-over-year to $22.2 billion. Revenue increased 15% year-over-year to $3.0 billion. • HomeAway delivered $305 million of revenue, representing an increase of 45% year-over-year. • Room nights stayed, including HomeAway, increased 16% year-over-year. • Room nights stayed for the global growth brands of Brand Expedia, Hotels.com, EAN and Egencia combined increased 18% year-over-year, with HomeAway room nights stayed up 36% year-over-year. • Adjusted EBITDA grew 6% year-over-year during the third quarter, including trivago's $8 million loss and an estimated negative impact of approximately $15 million to $20 million from the recent natural disasters. • The Expedia, Inc. global lodging portfolio increased to over 500,000 properties available as of September 30, 2017, up 57% year-over-year. HomeAway offers nearly 1.5 million online bookable listings. Financial Summary & Operating Metrics ($ millions except per share amounts) Metric Q3 2017 Q3 2016 Δ Y/Y Room night growth(1) 16% 31% (1,405) bps Gross bookings(1) $22,196.5 $19,988.1 11% Revenue 2,965.8 2,580.9 15% Operating income 481.7 386.2 25% Net income attributable to Expedia, Inc. 352.2 279.3 26% Diluted EPS $2.23 $1.81 23% Adjusted EBITDA(2) 709.3 666.7 6% Adjusted net income(2) 398.8 374.1 7% Adjusted EPS(2) $2.51 $2.41 4% Free cash flow(2) (612.3) (369.5) (66)% (1) Expedia acquired HomeAway on December 15, 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Mechanism Design and Online Economics
    Mechanism Design and Online Economics Project leader: Sergei Izmalkov We live in a digital world. People search, shop, work, and socialize online. In the last two decades we have seen emergence of new businesses and whole new sectors of the economy. Expedia, booking, google, Yandex, amazon, eBay, uber, pandora, netflix, facebook, apple | these are only a few examples of companies who have created new or transformed existing markets. This project is (mostly) about theory: how can we (as economists) model and analyze behavior of participants (users, firms, platforms, policy makers) in these new markers, and, possibly offer better designs? This area is particularly exiting (and challenging at the same time) for research as the markets, economic and social phenomena, are new and emerging, effectively being an uncharted territory. Below is a short list of possible topics that I list more like an indication of a range of possible research topics. I expect that each student in the project would come up with own research question, broadly aligned with the overall topic of the project. A few topics 1. Design and analysis of online economic mechanisms (especially auctions, but other mechanisms, e.g. queues, lotteries, pricing, matching are possible). Examples of problems: allocation of advertising positions, provision of cloud services, design of recommender systems, optimal information provision, persuasion, crowdfunding and collective action. 2. Analysis of performance, processes, users' activities of various economic mechanisms. E.g., ad auctions, procurement auctions, crowdfunding platforms, any digital services. 3. How links/ matches/ networks influence social and economic behaviour. 4. Analysis and modeling of privacy concerns.
    [Show full text]
  • New Mobile Entrants and Issues in Hotel Distribution by Matt Carrier, Manager of Revenue Strategy, Kalibri Labs
    New Mobile Entrants and Issues in Hotel Distribution By Matt Carrier, Manager of Revenue Strategy, Kalibri Labs The mobile eCommerce space in the hotel industry is growing and changing rapidly. With the massive influx of new distribution apps and mobile sites, it is vitally important that hoteliers stay educated and able to make informed decisions about their hotel participating (or not) in these new channels. Hoteliers must be able to take a pragmatic view of both their hotel(s) and these channels, with their specific customer profiles and compensation structures, to determine if they will be able to benefit from their participation. Last Minute Booking Apps One of the hottest topics in mobile hotel distribution at the moment is the rise and prevalence of last minute booking apps. Examples of this type of distribution channel include HotelTonight, Groupon Getaway Tonight and JustBook, among others. From a consumer perspective, these apps provide the opportunity to book a room at a significant discount from what they might expect to pay on traditional distribution channels or through the hotel's website. The tradeoff is that the guest can only book these discounted rooms on the day of arrival; they are essentially trading uncertainty about specific hotel availability and rates for the chance at booking a room at a significant discount. In some ways this is not dissimilar to the tradeoff offered by more traditional opaque Online Travel Agency programs, such as Priceline and Hotwire. However, what we're seeing now is the same day booking restriction loosening on some channels. From a hotel's perspective, the benefit of these apps is decidedly more mixed.
    [Show full text]
  • Visitor Profile - Satisfaction, Repeat Travel, and Trip Planning Satisfaction Ratings
    AVSP 7 – Summer 2016 Section 6: Visitor Profile - Satisfaction, Repeat Travel, and Trip Planning Satisfaction Ratings Satisfaction with Overall Experience Visitors were asked how satisfied they were with their overall Alaska experience. Satisfaction with specific trip elements, such as accommodations and transportation, was removed from the 2016 survey to allow room for new questions. Alaska visitors rate their overall trip satisfaction highly, with 75 percent very satisfied, 23 percent satisfied, and only 1 percent dissatisfied. Satisfaction ratings have increased slightly over the last decade, shifting from 70 percent very satisfied in 2006, to 71 percent in 2011, to 75 percent in 2016. Average satisfaction on a 1-to-5 scale has stayed consistent at 4.7. CHART 6.1 - Satisfaction with Overall Alaska Experience All Visitors, 2006, 2011, and 2016 70% Very satisfied 71% 75% 27% Satisfied 27% 23% 2% 2006 (Ave. 4.7) Neutral 2% 2% 2011 (Ave. 4.7) 1% 2016 (Ave. 4.7) Dissatisfied <1% 1% <1% Very dissatisfied <1% <1% AVSP 7 – Section 6: Visitor Profile - Satisfaction, Repeat Travel, and Trip Planning McDowell Group Page 6-1 Transportation Market Cruise passengers gave the highest overall satisfaction ratings at 76 percent very satisfied, followed by air visitors at 73 percent and highway/ferry visitors at 67 percent. Average ratings on a 1-to-5 scale are more comparable: 4.7 for both air and cruise visitors, and 4.6 for highway visitors. The percentage of very satisfied air visitors has increased gradually, from 68 percent in 2006, to 70 percent in 2011, to 73 percent in 2016.
    [Show full text]