67695253.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

67695253.Pdf Title 「情報」第20号(全文) Author(s) Editor(s) Citation 学術情報センター年報情報 .20 Issue Date 2014-09-01 URL http://hdl.handle.net/10466/13907 Rights http://repository.osakafu-u.ac.jp/dspace/ 学術情報センター年報 情 報 第 20 号 September 2014 公立大学法人 大阪府立大学 学術情報センター Library & Science Information Center Osaka Prefecture University 学術情報センター年報 情報 20号 目 次 巻頭言 ペーパーレスは可能か ............................................................................................................ 1 Ⅰ.報告・記事 ビブリオバトルの実施 .............................................................................................................. 4 学術情報センター図書館の環境整備 ...................................................................................... 5 大阪府立大学学術情報センター図書館・大阪府立中之島図書館共催講演会実施報告 「蔵書0冊からはじめる私設図書館、まちライブラリーの挑戦 ~大阪から全国に展開する「本」を通じて「人」と出会う文化拠点づくり~」................................... 6 大阪府立大学貴重図書専門部会連続講演会 「和書の魅力 -市大・府大の貴重書をめぐって-」 実施報告 .................................................. 7 平成 25 年度 貴重図書《展観と講演》 実施報告 ...................................................................... 8 平成 25 年度 貴重図書展示報告 ............................................................................................ 9 平成 25 年度 オンデマンド講習会・「情報基礎」授業実施報告 ................................................ 12 情報教育システムの端末リプレースについて ........................................................................... 20 全学無線LAN環境の整備 ..................................................................................................... 26 対外公開サーバのセキュリティ診断 ........................................................................................ 29 Ⅱ.活動資料(平成 25 年度) 平成 25 年度 学術情報センター委員会名簿 .......................................................................... 33 平成 25 年度 学術情報センター委員会活動記録 ................................................................... 37 大阪府立大学教員著作寄贈図書リスト ................................................................................... 38 出版物、展示等で利用された本学資料 ................................................................................... 39 Ⅲ.統計資料(平成 25 年度) U ホール白鷺の利用状況 ...................................................................................................... 40 大阪府立大学図書館統計 ...................................................................................................... 42 1 図書館概要 ................................................................................................................ 42 1.1 開館日数 .......................................................................................................... 42 1.2 座席数 ............................................................................................................. 42 1.3 学術情報センター図書館利用対象者数 ............................................................ 42 1.4 入館者数 .......................................................................................................... 43 1.5 入館者数(月別) ............................................................................................... 44 1.6 蔵書数(図書)................................................................................................... 44 1.7 所蔵雑誌(冊子体)種類数 ................................................................................ 45 2 図書管理業務 ............................................................................................................. 46 2.1 資料購入費 ...................................................................................................... 46 2.2 図書受入冊数................................................................................................... 47 2.3 雑誌(冊子体)受入種類数 ................................................................................ 48 2.4 視聴覚資料:所蔵数、受入数 ............................................................................ 48 3 利用サービス業務 ....................................................................................................... 49 3.1 館外貸出冊数................................................................................................... 49 3.2 館外貸出冊数(月別) ........................................................................................ 50 3.3 レファレンスサービス(利用者別) ....................................................................... 51 3.4 レファレンスサービス(質問別) ........................................................................... 52 3.5 図書館間相互協力(図書貸借) ......................................................................... 53 3.6 図書館間相互協力(文献複写) ......................................................................... 53 3.7 WEB 経由学内文献複写 .................................................................................. 54 3.8 キャンパス間図書貸出冊数 ............................................................................... 54 3.9 館内施設利用者数 ........................................................................................... 54 3.10 貸出パソコン・プロジェクタ利用件数 ................................................................ 54 3.11 貸出パソコン利用件数(月別) ......................................................................... 55 3.12 貴重図書閲覧冊数(学術情報センター図書館) ............................................... 55 3.13 テーマ展示の開催 .......................................................................................... 55 3.14 府民利用状況(学術情報センター図書館) ....................................................... 55 4 電子情報利用状況 ..................................................................................................... 56 4.1 電子ジャーナル利用統計 .................................................................................. 56 4.2 データベース利用統計 ..................................................................................... 56 4.3 電子書籍タイトル数 ........................................................................................... 56 4.4 学術情報リポジトリコンテンツ登録数 .................................................................. 57 4.5 リポジトリアクセス数 ........................................................................................... 57 情報システム統計 .................................................................................................................. 58 1 共通基盤システム キャンパスネットワーク利用統計 ...................................................... 58 1.1 学外からのメールの受信状況 ............................................................................ 58 1.2 メールボックスの提供状況 ................................................................................. 59 1.3 ホスト情報管理システム;HMS ........................................................................... 59 1.4 ポータルシステム利用状況 ................................................................................ 60 1.5 アンケートシステム利用状況 .............................................................................. 63 1.6 情報共有サイト利用状況 ................................................................................... 63 1.7 施設予約利用状況 ........................................................................................... 63 1.8 ポータルシステム稼動状況 ................................................................................ 64 1.9 財務会計システム稼働状況 ............................................................................... 64 1.10 人事給与システム稼働状況 ............................................................................. 65 1.11 教務学生システム稼働状況 ............................................................................. 65 2 教育研究支援サービス利用統計 ................................................................................. 66 2.1 授業支援システム 利用状況のべアクセス数 ...................................................... 66 2.2 出席管理システム 月別のべ利用者数(学生) .................................................... 69 2.3 学習・教育支援サイト(ポートフォリオ)利用状況.................................................. 70 2.4 キャンパスライセンスおよびMathematica Home Useライセンス利用状況 ........................ 72 2.5 同時アクセスライセンス利用状況 ....................................................................... 73 2.6 Microsoft 包括ライセンス利用状況 .................................................................... 74 2.7 Symantec 包括ライセンス利用状況 ................................................................... 74 3 情報教育システム利用統計 ......................................................................................... 75 3.1 学域・学部別システム利用人数 ......................................................................... 75 3.2 学域・学部別端末利用時間 ............................................................................... 77 3.3 学域・学部別利用者 1 人当たりの平均利用時間 ................................................ 79 3.4 学域・学部別プリンタ利用状況 .......................................................................... 81 3.5 教室(サテライト教室)別端末利用時間 ................................................................ 83 3.6 教室(サテライト教室)別端末 1 台当たりの月別平均利用時間 ............................. 84 3.7 教室(サテライト教室)別プリンタ利用状況 ........................................................... 85 3.8 平成 25 年度教室利用状況 .............................................................................. 86 巻頭言 *1 ペーパーレスは可能か 学術情報センター長補佐 馬野 元秀*2 ペーパーレスが叫ばれて久しい*3。「ペーパーレス」という単語を広辞苑で調べてみると、第 5 版(1998 年発行)にはなく、第 6 版(2008 年発行)には「ペーパー」のなかに追加されており、 「紙を使わないこと。特に、情報や資料を紙に印刷せず、コンピューターのみで扱うこと」*4 となっている。これを見ると、「ペーパーレス」という言葉が普通に使われるようになったのは 2000 年以降のことであると考えられる。「電子帳簿保存法」(1998 年施行)*5 と「e-文書法」(2004 年施行) *6 も関係しているかもしれない。 単に、書籍や資料をコンピュータに入れておき、必要に応じて画面上に表示して参照するだ けでも、十分、役に立つ。実際、保存場所が節約でき、検索も速くなる。しかし、考えをまと めたり、文章を書く場合などは、書籍や資料の必要な部分に下線を引いたり、ラインマーカで 色を付けたりする*7 必要がある。メモも書き加えたい。このようなことがコンピュータ上でう まく処理できないと、結局、書籍や資料(の一部)を印刷してしまうので、プリンタが速くなっ て便利に印刷できればできるほど*8、紙の消費量は増えてしまうことになる*9。これを記事*10 では、「『ストック』として保管される紙はペーパーレス化されたが、『フロー』として消費され る紙はあふれている」と表現し、「その違いは、おそらくは定型的で単純な業務と、非定型で創 造的な業務の差ではないかと思う」としている。 大学で行なっていることのほとんどは非定型なものなので、この部分をコンピュータで扱え るようにしないと、ペーパーレスどころか、逆に、紙の使用量は増えてしまうことになる*11。 では、どのような機能があればこのような作業を紙なしでできるようになるだろうか*12。 まず、いかに違和感なく書籍をコンピュータ上で操作できるかである。これについては、iPad に代表されるタブレット PC*13 の画面に指かペンで直接触れるという方法がよいと思われる。 また、下線を引いたり、ラインマーカで色を付けたり、メモを記入したりはペンで直接行なえ
Recommended publications
  • Download: Casestudy-Researchmethodology
    Case Study Design: A Refresher Mansureh Kebritchi, Ph.D. Research Methodology Group Agenda An overview about Major issues related case study to case study Answer your Case study design questions Definition of the Case Study “An empirical inquiry that investigates a contemporary phenomenon (e.g., a “case”) within its real-life context; when the boundaries between phenomenon and context are not clearly evident” (Yin, 2014, p.16) “A case study is an in-depth description and analysis of a bounded system” (Merriam, 2015, p.37). “The “what” is a bounded system (Smith, 1978), a single entity, a unit around which there are boundaries” (Merriam, 2015, p.38)/(Stake, 2005). Definition of the Case Study The most defining characteristics of case study is delimiting the object of the study: the case (Merriam, 2015) • The goal is to understand one thing well: a person, a program, a group, or specific policy; examples: one playground, one band. • Research question must be aligned/define the case/unit of analysis. A noun, seldom a verb, a functioning (Stake, 2006). Real things to visualize. Examples: not training, managing , giving birth but training modules, managers, labor rooms. The “Case” Bounded context The context The Case Examples A study of how older adults learn to use computers. The case/unit of analysis: learners’ experience. Indefinite number of adult leaders can be selected for this study. • Not a case study but a qualitative study One particular program, or classroom of leaners (a bounded system), or one particular learners selected based on success uniqueness, etc. • A case study When to use the Case Study Type of Research Questions relevant to the Case Study • Explanatory/explanatory/descriptive questions • How or why did something happen? Not Appropriate Questions • Cause and effect questions (experimental/quasi- experimental design) • How often something has happened (survey design) When to use the Case Study Data collection in “natural setting” not “derived“ data (Bromley, 1986, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Research and Practice in Technology Education
    36th International Pupils’ Attitudes Towards Technology Conference Athlone Institute of Technology, Co. Westmeath, Ireland 18th – 21st June 2018 Edited by: Dr Niall Seery Athlone Institute of Technology Jeffrey Buckley KTH Royal Institute of Technology Dr Donal Canty University of Limerick Joseph Phelan University of Limerick 2018 Technology Education Research Group © The Authors ISBN 978-1-5272-2507-7 eISBN 978-1-5272-2508-4 ii Conference organising committee Niall Seery (Conference chair), Athlone Institute of Technology, Ireland Donal Canty (Programme chair), University of Limerick, Ireland Rónán Dunbar (Site chair), Athlone Institute of Technology, Ireland Jeffrey Buckley, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden Joseph Phelan, University of Limerick, Ireland Clodagh Reid, Athlone Institute of Technology, Ireland Tomás Hyland, University of Limerick, Ireland Reviewing panel Stephanie Atkinson, University of Sunderland, United Kingdom David Barlex, University of Exeter, United Kingdom Scott Bartholomew, Purdue University, USA Dawne Bell, Edge Hill University, United Kingdom Brian Bowe, Dublin Institute of Technology, Ireland Jeffrey Buckley, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden Donal Canty, University of Limerick, Ireland Osnat Dagan, Beit Berl College, Israel Michael de Miranda, Texas A&M University, USA Marc de Vries, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands Andrew Doyle, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden Rónán Dunbar, Athlone Institute of Technology, Ireland Seamus Gordon, University of Limerick, Ireland Lena Gumaelius,
    [Show full text]
  • NNT : 2017SACLC077 Interfaces : Approches Interdisciplinaires
    NNT : 2017SACLC077 THESE DE DOCTORAT DE L’UNIVERSITE PARIS-SACLAY PREPAREE A L’ECOLE CENTRALESUPELEC ECOLE DOCTORALE N° 573 Interfaces : approches interdisciplinaires / fondements, applications et innovation Spécialité de doctorat : Sciences et technologies industrielles Par Mme Sonia Ben Hamida Innovate by Designing for Value – Towards a Design-to-Value Methodology in Early Design Stages Thèse présentée et soutenue à l’école CentraleSupélec, université Paris-Saclay, le 14/12/2017 : Composition du Jury : Mme Claudia Eckert, Professeur en Conception, Open University, Présidente M. Olivier de Weck, Professeur d’Aéronautique, d’Astronautique et d’Ingénierie Système, MIT, Rapporteur M. Benoît Eynard, Directeur Innovation & Partenariats et de l'Institut de Mécatronique, UTC, Rapporteur M. Yves Pigneur, Professeur en Business Model, Design et Innovation, HEC UNIL, Examinateur M. Bernard Yannou, Directeur du Laboratoire de Génie Industriel, CentraleSupélec, Examinateur M. Alain Huet, Chef du service Architecture de Systèmes Complexes, ArianeGroup, Examinateur M. Jean-Claude Bocquet, Professeur en Conception, CentraleSupélec, Directeur de thèse Mme Marija Jankovic, Maître de Conférences en Conception, CentraleSupélec, Co-directrice de thèse Acknowledgments I am reaching the end of this exciting, inspiring, and unforgettable journey which was only possible thanks to the wonderful people who accompanied me along the way. I would like to take the opportunity to express my sincerest gratitude to my academic advisors Prof. Dr. Marija Jankovic and Prof. Dr. Jean-Claude Bocquet for the time they spent with me to frame and shape this research project as well as for the guidance and continuous encouragement throughout the years, and to my colleagues at Airbus Safran Launchers for the feedback and inspiration they gave me.
    [Show full text]
  • Laadullisen Aineiston Analyysiohjelmistot: Atlas.Ti
    LAADULLISEN AINEISTON ANALYYSIOHJELMISTOT: ATLAS.TI Sanna Herkama & Anne Laajalahti Metodifestivaalit, Tampere 27.8.2019 SANNA HERKAMA ANNE LAAJALAHTI Erikoistutkija, FT Koulutus- ja kehittämisjohtaja, FT INVEST-tutkimushanke, www.invest.utu.fi Infor, www.infor.fi Psykologian ja logopedian laitos Prologos ry, puheenjohtaja Turun yliopisto Mevi ry, varapuheenjohtaja ProCom ry, Tiede- ja teoriajaos, puheenjohtaja TOPICS & Laajalahti 2019 Herkama • Technologies in qualitative analysis • What can you and can’t do with ATLAS.ti? • ATLAS.ti in practice Laajalahti, A. & Herkama, S. (2018). Laadullinen analyysi ATLAS.ti-ohjelmistolla. • Utilising ATLAS.ti – pitfalls and benefits In R. Valli (Ed.), Ikkunoita • Closing remarks tutkimusmetodeihin 2. 5th edition. Jyväskylä: PS-kustannus, 106–133. TECHNOLOGIES SHAPE OUR THINKING Medium is the 1 Conducting research has always been intertwined with the usage of message! various aids, tools, and technologies. Also, various software have assisted ~ Marshall McLuhan researchers for long. 2 Even such choices as the utilisation of A4 paper size (Järpvall 2016) and PowerPoint slides (Adams 2006) guide the way we process information, i.e. how we produce, reproduce, use, and share information! Herkama & Laajalahti 2019 TRADITIONAL OR COMPUTER ASSISTED Computer ANALYSIS? Assisted/Aided Qualitative 1 Traditional analysis: Should I go for a traditional way of analysing Data research material? Paper prints and coloring, copy-paste procedures, Analysis hanging papers on the wall, post-it tags etc.? Software 2 Computer assisted analysis: Should I use Computer Assisted/Aided Qualitative Data Analysis Software (CAQDAS)? Storing data in one place, checking up things quickly, handling text and audiovisual material parallel, creating summaries in seconds… Herkama & Laajalahti 2019 CAQDAS – RESTRICTING OR EXPANDING THINKING? 1 Technologies shape our thinking – whether we want it or not (Laajalahti & Herkama 2018).
    [Show full text]
  • Proyecto Fin De Grado
    ESCUELA TÉCNICA SUPERIOR DE INGENIERÍA Y SISTEMAS DE TELECOMUNICACIÓN PROYECTO FIN DE GRADO TÍTULO: Desarrollo de un procedimiento de análisis en foros virtuales AUTOR: Daniel Morejudo Varas TITULACIÓN: Grado en Ingeniería Telemática DIRECTOR: Mary Luz Mouronte López TUTOR: Ana Belén García Hernando DEPARTAMENTO: Ingeniería Telemática y Electrónica VºBº Miembros del Tribunal Calificador: PRESIDENTE: Juan Sancho Gil TUTOR: Ana Belén García Hernando SECRETARIO: Esther Gago García Fecha de lectura: Calificación: El Secretario, Resumen La comunicación entre personas ha permitido una mayor velocidad en la evolución del ser humano, por ello, han surgido diversas formas de análisis textual y gestual. Este proyecto abarca el desarrollo de un sistema de análisis textual centrado en los foros virtuales y concretamente en el espacio de aprendizaje de Moodle correspondiente a la asignatura de Sistemas Operativos en el curso académico 2013/2014 en la Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM) de la Escuela de Ingeniería Técnica Superior de Ingeniería y Sistemas de Telecomunicación (ETSIST). Este sistema no se centra en volver a crear una nueva herramienta desde el principio, sino que se ha realizado un estudio de la red del foro, teniendo en cuenta los condicionantes tecnológicos existentes en el análisis textual, y se ha seleccionado una herramienta open- source ya existente, denominada KH Coder. Además, se ha creado una aplicación capaz de convertir los datos ofrecidos por la ETSIST en información válida para la herramienta seleccionada. También se
    [Show full text]
  • Fábio Mauro Garcês De Freitas Tese.Pdf
    Universidade de Departamento de Educação e Psicologia Aveiro 2020 Fábio Mauro Aprendizagem e Manuais de Utilizador dos QDAS: Garcês de Freitas O Caso do webQDA Universidade de Departamento de Educação e Psicologia Aveiro 2020 Fábio Mauro Aprendizagem e Manuais de Utilizador dos QDAS: Garcês de Freitas O Caso do webQDA Tese apresentada à Universidade de Aveiro para cumprimento dos requisitos necessários à obtenção do grau de Doutor em Multimédia em Educação, realizada sob a orientação científica do Doutor Francislê Neri de Souza, Diretor Académico do Centro Universitário Adventista de São Paulo - UNASP (Brasil) e coorientação do Doutor António Pedro Costa do Departamento de Educação e Psicologia da Universidade de Aveiro Apoio financeiro da FCT Ref. SFRH/BD/110760/2015 e do FSE no âmbito do III Quadro Comunitário de Apoio. (...) “Entendes tu o que lês? E ele disse: Como poderei entender, se alguém não me ensinar?” Livro de Atos 8:30,31 o júri presidente Prof. Doutor Paulo Vila Real Professor Catedrático, Universidade de Aveiro Prof. Doutor José Luís Pires Ramos Professor Associado, Universidade de Évora Prof.ª Doutora Clara Maria Gil Ferreira Fernandes Pereira Coutinho Professora Auxiliar Aposentada, Universidade do Minho Prof. Doutor Jaime Emanuel Moreira Ribeiro Professor Adjunto, Instituto Politécnico de Leiria Prof.ª Doutora Patrícia Alexandra Pacheco de Sá Investigadora Doutorada, Universidade de Aveiro Prof. Doutor António Pedro Costa Investigador Doutorado, Universidade de Aveiro (Co-Orientador) agradecimentos O primeiro e maior de todos os agradecimentos vai para o meu grandioso Deus, pois sem Ele nada seria possível. Ele é o princípio e o fim de todas as coisas.
    [Show full text]
  • Kaip Parašyti Mokslinį Rašto Darbą?
    PRIEDAI • 79 Jolanta Aleknevičienė Aušra Pocienė Maryja Šupa Kaip parašyti mokslinį rašto darbą? Mokomoji priemonė Vilniaus universiteto Filosofijos fakulteto kriminologijos ir sociologijos studentams VILNIAUS UNIVERSITETO LEIDYKLA PRIEDAI • 79 Jolanta Aleknevičienė Aušra Pocienė Maryja Šupa Kaip parašyti mokslinį rašto darbą? Mokomoji priemonė Vilniaus universiteto Filosofijos fakulteto kriminologijos ir sociologijos studentams VILNIAUS UNIVERSITETO LEIDYKLA 2020 Apsvarstė ir rekomendavo išleisti Vilniaus universiteto Filosofijos fakulteto taryba (2019 m. lapkričio 19 d., protokolas Nr. 250000-TP-13) Recenzentai: doc. dr. Vaidas Morkevičius (Kauno technologijos universitetas) doc. dr. Daiva Skučienė (Vilniaus universitetas) doc. dr. Rūta Žiliukaitė (Vilniaus universitetas) Leidinio bibliografinė informacija pateikiama Lietuvos nacionalinės Martyno Mažvydo bibliotekos Nacionalinės bibliografijos duomenų banke (NBDB) Ketvirto viršelio nuotraukos autorė Aistė Girkontaitė. ISBN 978-609-07-0381-6 (skaitmeninis PDF) © Jolanta Aleknevičienė, 2020 © Aušra Pocienė, 2020 © Maryja Šupa, 2020 © Vilniaus universitetas, 2020 Turinys Pratarmė • 4 1. Pasirengimas moksliniam rašto darbui • 5 1.1. Mokslinių žinių samprata ir pirmieji mokslinio darbo rengimo žingsniai • 5 1.2. Temos ir mokslinės problemos formulavimas • 9 1.3. Rašto darbo struktūra • 14 2. Teorinė rašto darbo dalis • 22 2.1. Mokslinės informacijos šaltinių paskirtis, paieška ir įvertinimas • 22 2.2. Kryptingas mokslinės literatūros skaitymas ir nagrinėjimas • 27 2.3. Citavimas ir šaltinių nurodymas rašto darbe • 30 3. Tiriamoji rašto darbo dalis • 37 3.1. Tyrimo metodologija ir tyrimo procesas • 37 3.2. Kiekybinis tyrimas, kiekybiniai duomenų rinkimo metodai ir analizė • 39 3.3. Kokybinis tyrimas, kokybinių duomenų rinkimo metodai ir analizė • 46 3.4. Mišrių metodų tyrimas • 52 4. Kriminologinių ir sociologinių tyrimų etika • 57 5. Mokslinio rašto darbo baigiamasis etapas • 63 5.1. Mokslinio darbo redagavimas ir pateikimas • 63 5.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of Evolution, Changes and Trends in World Cartography Using Methods of Computer Linguistics and Visual Analytics
    Kartografické listy / Cartographic letters, 2020, 28 (2), 53-68 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ IDENTIFICATION OF EVOLUTION, CHANGES AND TRENDS IN WORLD CARTOGRAPHY USING METHODS OF COMPUTER LINGUISTICS AND VISUAL ANALYTICS Jakub KONÍČEK Identification of evolution, changes and trends in world cartography using methods of computer linguistics and visual analytics Abstract: Cartography is one of the world’s oldest sciences. Over time, it has experienced many changes and developmental stages. Current world social, political and artistic trends and issues are affecting this development. Each of these influences has shaped cartography and car- tographic creation into the form as we currently know. It is clear that these developments will be ongoing and that various significant and important changes will occur. However, the evolu- tion of cartography must be thoughtfully managed so that it pursues current trends and remains timeless, otherwise the science may well be very easily reduced to an ancient discipline. The paper presents the developments, changes and trends in world cartography. The main aim was to identify the trends and critical milestones which resulted from these developments in carto- graphy over time. The interests and activities of professional and scientific groups of the Inter- national Cartographic Association, the thematic focus of papers presented at International Car- tographic Conferences and the critical ideas of cartographic articles in peer-reviewed journals are ideal materials for similar research. Methods of computational linguistics and visual analy- sis allows the study, identification and presentation of the key milestones which directly affect these materials. This type of knowledge can provide effective assistance in the management of future developments and directions in cartography.
    [Show full text]
  • Science Fictions, Cultural Facts: a Digital Humanities Approach to a Popular Literature
    ResearchOnline@JCU This file is part of the following work: Menadue, Christopher Benjamin James (2019) Science fictions, cultural facts: a digital humanities approach to a popular literature. PhD Thesis, James Cook University. Access to this file is available from: https://doi.org/10.25903/5ef01cb4754df Copyright © 2019 Christopher Benjamin James Menadue. The author has certified to JCU that they have made a reasonable effort to gain permission and acknowledge the owners of any third party copyright material included in this document. If you believe that this is not the case, please email [email protected] SCIENCE FICTIONS, CULTURAL FACTS A Digital Humanities Approach to a Popular Literature Christopher Benjamin James Menadue MA(Cantab), MBA, PGCE College of Arts, Society and Education Adjunct Research Fellow of The Cairns Institute James Cook University This dissertation is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 2019 To my father, and the musty, neglected copies of Astounding Science Fiction I found in his study long ago My first SF magazine: Astounding Science Fiction, January 1957 DECLARATION This dissertation is the result of my own work. To the best of my knowledge and belief this thesis does not contain any material previously published or written by another person, or which is the outcome of work done in collaboration, except where specifically indicated in the text. It has not been previously submitted, in part or whole, to any university of institution for any degree, diploma, or other qualification. I acknowledge that an electronic copy of my thesis must be lodged with the University Library and subject to the General Award Rules of James Cook University, immediately made available for research and study in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968(Cth).
    [Show full text]
  • Mind-It. Introducing Mindfulness Online to Help Students Change Perceptions and Develop Interest: a Design-Based Research Approach
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 12-2020 Mind-It. Introducing Mindfulness Online to Help Students Change Perceptions and Develop Interest: A Design-Based Research Approach Joana M. Franco Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd Part of the Instructional Media Design Commons Recommended Citation Franco, Joana M., "Mind-It. Introducing Mindfulness Online to Help Students Change Perceptions and Develop Interest: A Design-Based Research Approach" (2020). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 7964. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/7964 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MIND-IT. INTRODUCING MINDFULNESS ONLINE TO HELP STUDENTS CHANGE PERCEPTIONS AND DEVELOP INTEREST: A DESIGN-BASED RESEARCH APPROACH by Joana M. Franco A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Instructional Technology and Learning Sciences Approved: ________________________________ ________________________________ Mimi Recker, Ph.D. Heloisa Rutigliano, Ph.D. Major Professor Committee Member ________________________________ ________________________________ Jody Clarke-Midura, Ed.D. Michael E. Levin, Ph.D. Committee Member Committee Member ________________________________ ________________________________ Victor Lee, Ph.D. D. Richard Cutler, Ph.D. Committee Member Interim Vice Provost of Graduate Studies UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY Logan, Utah 2020 ii Copyright © Joana M. Franco 2020 All Right Reserved iii ABSTRACT Mind-It. Introducing Mindfulness Online to Help Students Change Perceptions and Develop Interest: A Design-Based Research Approach by Joana M.
    [Show full text]
  • Qualitative Research Using Open Tools
    Qualitative Research Using Open Tools Beth M. Duckles, [email protected], @bduckles Vicky Steeves, [email protected], @VickySteeves csv,conf,v4 What is Qualitative Data Analysis (QDA)? The systematic collection, organization and interpretation of unstructured data (e.g.interview transcripts, public documents, focus groups, open-ended survey questions) After a close reading of the qualitative data, researchers will assign “codes” or themes to relevant quotes and/or sections of video/audio/images. What qualitative research is *not* Anything automatic is not qual. Qual = deep engagement ● Word counts/clouds (e.g. Voyant) ● Machine learning e.g. text mining, keyword extraction, sentiment analysis ● Artificial Intelligence e.g. predictive learning ● Mixed methods ○ Qual is *one part* of mixed methods (think square <> rectangle) Why qualitative methods? Used by a wide range of fields, such as anthropology, education, nursing, information science, psychology, sociology, history, and user experience (UX) /marketing. Qualitative data is varied: observations, interview or focus group transcripts, public or archival documents, memos, jottings, media (newspapers, magazines, tweets), visuals and more. Why qualitative methods? Qualitative methods can generate rich, detailed data that leave cultural contexts and individuals’ perspectives intact allowing for deeper understanding of phenomenon. Answers questions that quantitative studies cannot. Helps researchers understand the “why”. How QDA works Collect data Coding Patterns Analysis Organize
    [Show full text]
  • Corpus-Based Research in the Humanities
    Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Corpus-Based Research in the Humanities CRH-2 25-26 January 2018 Vienna, Austria Editors: Andrew U. Frank Christine Ivanovic Francesco Mambrini Marco Passarotti Caroline Sporleder Proposed BibTeX entries: @Proceedings{crh-2, title = {Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Corpus- Based Research in the Humanities {CRH-2}}, year = {2018}, editor = {Andrew U. Frank and Christine Ivanovic and Francesco Mambrini and Marco Passarotti and Caroline Sporleder}, volume = {1}, series = {Gerastree proceedings}, isbn = {978-3-901716-43-0}, } @InProceedings{crh2intro2018, author = {Francesco Mambrini and Marco Passarotti and Caroline Sporleder}, title = {Preface}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Corpus-Based Research in the Humanities {CRH-2}}, year = {2018}, editor = {Andrew U. Frank and Christine Ivanovic and Francesco Mambrini and Marco Passarotti and Caroline Sporleder}, volume = {1}, series = {Gerastree proceedings}, pages = {I-IV}, isbn = {978-3-901716-43-0}, } Copyright ©2018 by the individual authors. All rights reserved. !BN 9$8%&%#01$1'%(&%0 Published by Gerastree Pro*eedings, GTP 1. ,ept. o- Geoin-or.ation, TU Wien+ Austria. Cover: 1es Four*hes, seen fro. the Bretagne coast near Plouar3el 42ran*e). Photo by Andrew U. Fran7. Preface The second edition of the international workshop on "Corpus-based Research in the Humanities" (CRH) is held in Vienna, hosted by Academy Corpora of the Austrian Academy of Science (https://www.oeaw.ac.at/ac/). It follows, on a biannual basis, the edition held in Warsaw in December 2015. But the origins of the workshop go back even further, CRH being the direct descendant of the former workshop on "Annotation of Corpora for Research in the Humanities" (ACRH), which was held three times: in Heidelberg (January 2012), Lisbon (November 2012), and Sofia (December 2013).
    [Show full text]