DOCSLIB.ORG

Update to Rare Birds of California 1 January 2004 – 22 January 2021 Edited by Jim Tietz & Guy Mccaskie

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Update to Rare Birds of California 1 January 2004 – 22 January 2021 Edited by Jim Tietz & Guy Mccaskie Update to Rare Birds of California 1 January 2004 – 22 January 2021 Edited by Jim Tietz & Guy McCaskie This table updates the records listed in the species accounts published in Rare Birds of California. It follows the format described on pages 42-43 of that book. This table will be updated periodically as new decisions are reached by the California Bird Records Committee (CBRC). Rare Birds of California includes all records through 31 December 2003. Please report errors or omissions in this list to: [email protected] BLACK-BELLIED WHISTLING-DUCK Dendrocygna autumnalis Accepted: 35 (81%) Not accepted: 8 Not submitted/reviewed: 8 Black-bellied Whistling-Duck – Accepted 32. 15-27 May 2012 Toledo Pits, vic. Tipton TUL 2012-074 38 ph. 33. 2 Jul 2015 Bonelli Reg. Park LA 2015-058 41 ph. 34-35. 12 Sep 2017 2 Blythe RIV 2017-080 43 ph. Black-bellied Whistling-Duck – Not accepted, natural occurrence questionable 28 Jul 2004 Imperial Valley IMP 2006-015 31 8 Jul 2006 L. Balboa LA 2006-228 40 ph. 2-9 Aug 2015 Howarth Park, Santa Rosa SON 2015-076 41 ph. and 21 Sep-3 Nov 2015 Roberts L., Petaluma SON 2015-121 41 ph. FULVOUS WHISTLING-DUCK Dendrocygna bicolor Accepted: 8 (100%) Not accepted: 0 Not submitted/reviewed: 0 CBRC review: 2011 to present Fulvous Whistling-Duck – Accepted 1-6. 3-7 Jan 2015 6 San Jacinto W.A. RIV 2015-006 41 ph. 7. 9 Apr-7 Jul 2018 L. Los Carneros & Goleta W.T.P. SBA 2018-031 ph. 8. 11-20 Jul 2018 Ballona Freshwater Marsh LA 2018-075 ph. BAR-HEADED GOOSE Anser indicus Accepted: 0 Not accepted: 3 Not submitted/reviewed: 0 Bar-headed Goose – Not accepted, natural occurrence questionable 3-5 Jan 2009 Seal Beach ORA 2009-005 35 ph. EMPEROR GOOSE Anser canagica Accepted: 99 (80%) Not accepted: 25 Not submitted/reviewed: 123 Emperor Goose – Accepted 84. 27 Oct 1915 West Butte SUT 2007-097 33 MVZ #25861 85-86. 27 Dec 1994-3 Feb 1995 2 Crescent City Harbor DN 1995-146 39 ph. 87. 3-13 Dec 1996 L. Cleone, MacKerricher SP MEN 2010-010 35 ph. 88. 2-10 Apr 2006 Smith River Bottoms DN 2006-048 32 ph. 89-90. 24 Nov 2006 2 Big River Estuary MEN 2007-007 32 91. 27-28 Nov 2006 Arcata HUM 2006-195 32 ph. 92. 2 Mar 2007 North Jetty, Humboldt Bay HUM 2007-085 33 93. 27 Nov 2011 Rodeo Lagoon MRN 2011-270 38 94. 5-9 Oct 2015 Smith River Bottoms DN 2015-110 41 ph. 95. 9-27 Mar 2016 Seven Mile Slough, Isleton SAC 2016-015 42 ph. 96. 23 Jan-6 Mar 2017 Sharp Park Golf Course, Pacifica SM 2017-009 43 ph. 97-98. 9 Jan-15 Mar 2020 2 Pt. Piedras Blancas SLO 2020-007 ph. and 20 Mar-3 Apr 2020 2 San Gregorio State Beach SM 2020-022 ph. 99. 18 Mar 2020 Bodega Head SON 2020-021 ph. Emperor Goose – Not accepted, identification not established 14 Dec 2005 4 Lower Klamath N.W.R. SIS 2006-225 33 15 Dec 2007 Pt. Reyes MRN 2008-123 35 1 Feb 2015 8 km E of Hershey COL/YOL 2015-073 41 Emperor Goose – Not submitted/reviewed 22 Feb 2005 Eel River Wildlife Area HUM Sep 2005 2 Northern California 15 Feb 2007 3 Cosumnes River Preserve SAC TUNDRA BEAN-GOOSE Anser serrirostris Accepted: 1 (100%) Not accepted: 0 Not submitted/reviewed: 0 Tundra Bean-Goose – Accepted 1. 19 Oct 2013 Unit 1, Salton Sea N.W.R. IMP 2013-181 39 ph. TAIGA/TUNDRA BEAN-GOOSE Anser fabalis/serrirostris Accepted: 1 (100%) Not accepted: 0 Not submitted/reviewed: 0 Taiga/Tundra Bean-Goose – Accepted 1. 9 Nov 2010-12 Jan 2011 Salton Sea N.W.R. IMP 2010-141 37 ph. BARNACLE GOOSE Branta leucopsis Accepted: 0 Not accepted: 4 Not submitted/reviewed: 1 Barnacle Goose – Not accepted, natural occurrence questionable 16-18 Jan 2005 San Joaquin River N.W.R. STA 2005-025 31 ph. TRUMPETER SWAN Cygnus buccinator Accepted: 147 (54%) Not accepted: 127 Not submitted/reviewed: 40+ CBRC review: records through 2011 Trumpeter Swan – Accepted 60-61. 28 Nov 2004 2 Lower Klamath N.W.R. SIS 2004-203 30 62-67. 23 Dec 2005-6 Feb 2006 6 vic. Durham BUT 2005-214 31 ph. 68-75. 15-17 Jan 2006 8 N of Willows GLE 2006-010 32 video 76. 2 Dec 2007 Modoc N.W.R. MOD 2007-281 33 77. 23 Feb-9 Mar 2008 Edwards Air Force Base LA 2008-038 34 ph. 78. 20-26 Dec 2008 Lake of the Pines NEV 2009-069 37 ph. 79-84. 17 Feb 2009 6 Alturas MOD 2009-157 35 ph. 85-89. 26 Nov-1 Dec 2009 5 Modoc N.W.R. MOD 2011-029 37 ph. and 23 Jan 2010 2 Modoc N.W.R. MOD 2011-030 37 ph. 90-96. 31 Dec 2010 7 Surprise Valley, Eagleville MOD 2011-035 36 ph. 97-100. 11-12 Jan 2011 4 vic. Nelson BUT 2010-157 37 ph. 101-102. 19-24 Jan 2011 2 Waltz Rd., vic. Sheridan PLA 2011-173 37 ph. 103-116. 28-30 Dec 2010 14 Modoc N.W.R. MOD 2011-031 37 ph. 117-118. 8-10 Dec 2011 2 5.6 km NE of Tipton TUL 2011-271 37 ph. 119-142. 28-30 Dec 2011 24 Modoc N.W.R. MOD 2011-240 37 ph. 143-147. 31 Dec 2011-9 Jan 2012 5 vic. Durham BUT 2011-231 37 ph. Trumpeter Swan – Not accepted, identification not established 5 Feb 1855 The Buttes SUT 1855-801 41 UMZC #12/Ana/25/b/1 16 Nov 1930 Tule L. SIS 2007-045 27 Jan 1988 vic. Hilt SIS 2007-046 6-26 Feb 2005 3 Nicasio Reservoir MRN 2005-033 31 13 Nov 2005 Sacramento SAC 2005-154 31 14 Nov 2006 6 N of Weed SIS 2006-184 32 6 Feb 2007 NE of Willows GLE 2007-064 33 29 Dec 2008 Lewiston L. TRI 2009-007 34 19 Mar 2009 Modoc N.W.R. MOD 2009-064 36 15-19 Nov 2010 Sonora Junction MNO 2010-152 36 ph. 18 Dec 2010 2 American Valley PLU 2011-178 37 Trumpeter Swan – Not accepted, natural occurrence questionable 8-12 Dec 2004 Goleta SBA 2005-012 30 23-24 Dec 2004 Hansen Dam LA & Havasu N.W.R. SBE 2004-219 30 17 Jun-22 Oct 2006 Crowley L. MNO 2006-113 32 ph. 6-9 Apr 2009 Auburn Regional Park PLA 2009-122 36 ph. and 17 Feb-23 Mar 2010 2 Auburn Regional Park PLA 2010-014 36 ph. and 5 Mar 2011 Auburn PLA 2011-172 37 ph. Trumpeter Swan – Not submitted/reviewed 22 Dec 2006 3 Shasta Valley Wildlife Area SIS WHOOPER SWAN Cygnus cygnus Accepted: 11 (69%) Not accepted: 5 Not submitted/reviewed: 6 Whooper Swan – Accepted 11. 9 Jan 2011 King I. SJ 2011-179 38 Whooper Swan – Not accepted, identification not established 7 Feb-13 Mar 2004 Lower Klamath N.W.R. SIS 2005-023 31 ph. 28 Nov 2004-6 Mar 2005 Lower Klamath N.W.R. SIS 2006-079 31 video RUDDY SHELDUCK Tadorna ferruginea Accepted: 0 Not accepted: 4 Not submitted/reviewed: 2 Ruddy Shelduck – Not accepted, natural occurrence questionable 2 Aug 2004 Santa Maria W.T.P. SBA 2004-612 43 ph. 15 Oct 2018 vic. Cosumnes R. Preserve SAC 2018-192 ph. BAIKAL TEAL Sibirionetta formosa Accepted: 8 (89%) Not accepted: 1 Not submitted/reviewed: 0 Baikal Teal – Accepted 6. 10 Dec 2005-9 Jan 2006 vic. Lompoc SBA 2005-187 31 ph. 7. 21 Jan 2008 vic. Loleta HUM 2008-035 34 8. 12 Dec 2018 vic. Los Banos MER 2018-248 GARGANEY Spatula querquedula Accepted: 30 (83%) Not accepted: 6 Not submitted/reviewed: 4 Garganey – Accepted 24. 25 Nov 2017-11 Mar 2018 Waller Park, Santa Maria SBA 2017-139 43 ph. 25. 1-17 Mar 2019 West Sacramento YOL 2019-021 ph. and 3-31 Jan 2020 West Sacramento YOL 2020-002 ph. 26. 7 Jun 2019 New Chicago Marsh SCL 2019-051 ph. 27. 20 Sep 2019 Baker sewage ponds SBE 2019-124 ph. 28. 10 Nov 2019-30 Mar 2020 Salton Sea SRA RIV 2019-174 ph. 29. 26 Feb-13 Apr 2020 Border Tule W.H. in Arbuckle COL 2020-015 ph. 30. 19 Mar 2020 Staten I. SJ 2020-023 ph. Garganey – Not accepted, identification not established 29 Apr 2004 2 Petaluma SON 2004-103 30 4-6 May 2004 Humboldt Bay N.W.R. HUM 2004-063 31 FALCATED DUCK Mareca falcata Accepted: 3 (60%) Not accepted: 2 Not submitted/reviewed: 0 Falcated Duck – Accepted 3. 8 Dec 2011-10 Feb 2012 Colusa N.W.R. COL 2011-205 37 ph., video and 2-19 Dec 2012 Colusa N.W.R. COL 2012-196 38 ph. and 30 Dec 2012 Sacramento N.W.R. GLN 2012-238 38 and 30 Oct 2014-17 Feb 2015 Colusa N.W.R. COL 2014-122 40 ph. AMERICAN BLACK DUCK Anas rubripes Accepted: 2 (40%) Not accepted: 3 Not submitted/reviewed: 3 American Black Duck – Accepted 2. 21 Dec 2006 SE of Willows COL 2007-015 33 ph. COMMON POCHARD Aythya ferina Accepted: 5 (100%) Not accepted: 0 Not submitted/reviewed: 0 Common Pochard – Accepted 4. 20 Dec 2016-13 Jan 2017 Freshwater Lagoon HUM 2016-133 42 ph. 5. 9 Jan 2019 San Pablo Bay SOL 2019-003 ph.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Santa Cruz County Coastal Climate Change Vulnerability Report
    Santa Cruz County Coastal Climate Change Vulnerability Report JUNE 2017 CENTRAL COAST WETLANDS GROUP MOSS LANDING MARINE LABS | 8272 MOSS LANDING RD, MOSS LANDING, CA Santa Cruz County Coastal Climate Change Vulnerability Report This page intentionally left blank Santa Cruz County Coastal Climate Change Vulnerability Report i Prepared by Central Coast Wetlands Group at Moss Landing Marine Labs Technical assistance provided by: ESA Revell Coastal The Nature Conservancy Center for Ocean Solutions Prepared for The County of Santa Cruz Funding Provided by: The California Ocean Protection Council Grant number C0300700 Santa Cruz County Coastal Climate Change Vulnerability Report ii Primary Authors: Central Coast Wetlands group Ross Clark Sarah Stoner-Duncan Jason Adelaars Sierra Tobin Kamille Hammerstrom Acknowledgements: California State Ocean Protection Council Abe Doherty Paige Berube Nick Sadrpour Santa Cruz County David Carlson City of Capitola Rich Grunow Coastal Conservation and Research Jim Oakden Science Team David Revell, Revell Coastal Bob Battalio, ESA James Gregory, ESA James Jackson, ESA GIS Layer support AMBAG Santa Cruz County Adapt Monterey Bay Kelly Leo, TNC Sarah Newkirk, TNC Eric Hartge, Center for Ocean Solution Santa Cruz County Coastal Climate Change Vulnerability Report iii Contents Contents Summary of Findings ........................................................................................................................ viii 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Subsequent Initial Study of Environmental Impact
    Cayucos Sanitary District 200 Ash Avenue Cayucos CA 93430 www.cayucossd.org • 805-773-4658 Cayucos Sustainable Water Project (CSWP) Subsequent Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Estero Marine Terminal Ocean Outfall Project Component Subsequent Initial Study of Environmental Impact I. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION FORM 1. Project Title: Cayucos Sustainable Water Project Ocean Outfall 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: Cayucos Sanitary District 200 Ash Avenue / PO Box 333 Cayucos CA 93430 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: David Foote, c/o firma, (805) 781-9800 4. Project Location: Chevron Estero Marine Terminal 4000 Highway 1, Morro Bay, California 93442 5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Cayucos Sanitary District 200 Ash Avenue / PO Box 333 Cayucos CA 93430 6. General Plan Designation: The proposed pipeline tie-in site is designated Agriculture. The effluent pipeline conveyances are within public right-of-way (State Route 1) and Waters of the U.S. and State. 7. Zoning: Agriculture (County) and Open Area I/PD (City of Morro Bay west of State Route 1 and the mean high tide line) Cayucos Sustainable Water Project Ocean Outfall Initial Environmental Study Final January 2019 1 Cayucos Sanitary District 200 Ash Avenue Cayucos CA 93430 www.cayucossd.org • 805-773-4658 Cayucos Sustainable Water Project (CSWP) Subsequent Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Estero Marine Terminal Ocean Outfall Project Component 8. Project Description & Regulatory and Environmental setting LOCATION AND BACKGROUND The Project consists of the reuse of an existing ocean conveyance pipe for treated effluent disposal from the proposed and permitted Cayucos Sustainable Water Project’s (CSWP) Water Resource Recovery Facility (WRRF) by the Cayucos Sanitary District (CSD).
    [Show full text]
  • Your April 2017 Neighborhoods First New...Ter
    12/12/2017 Your April 2017 Neighborhoods First Newsletter - Mike Bonin - Council District 11 ABOUT MIKE COUNCIL STAFF NEWS ISSUES NEIGHBORHOODS MEDIA TAKE ACTION HOME » NEWS Your April 2017 Neighborhoods First Newsletter Sign Up For Updates Posted by David Graham-Caso 721.80sc on April 28, 2017 · Flag · Add your reaction April 2017 Welcome to the April issue of Mike Bonin's "Neighborhoods First Newsletter!” IN THIS ISSUE: Construction begins on Mar Vista’s Great Street, Mike fights for funding for a life-saving program to end traffic fatalities, and an effort launches Contact Our Ofce to protect people from dangerous oil and gas wells in our neighborhoods... but first, please read this month's Neighborhoods First Profile about a Pacific Palisades neighbor who is helping kids see a bright future ahead of them. Connect with Facebook You can find out more about Mike, meet your CD11 staff and see the latest Connect with Twitter videos and updates from the Westside on our website at www.11thdistrict.com. And remember to like Mike's Facebook page to see the latest news about your neighborhood. Councilmember Mike… 5,188 likes Liked You and 17 other friends like this Vision to Learn: Pacific Palisades’ Austin Beutner Is Helping Kids See Success Pacific Palisades neighbor Austin Beutner has served Los Angeles in a variety of capacities - as First Deputy Mayor, interim head of the Los Angeles Department Water and Power, and publisher and CEO of the Los Angeles Times. In 2012, however, Beutner founded Vision To Learn - an organization that serves Los Angeles in a different, more focused way.
    [Show full text]
  • National Forest Genetic Electrophoresis Lab Annual Report 2003 – 2004 (FY04)
    USDA FOREST SERVICE NATIONAL FOREST GENETICS LABORATORY (NFGEL) Annual Report 2003 – 2004 (FY04) 2480 Carson Road, Placerville, CA 95667 530-622-1609 (voice), 530-622-2633 (fax), [email protected] Report prepared December 2004 INTRODUCTION This report covers laboratory activities and accomplishments during Fiscal Year 2004. October 1, 2003 through September 30, 2004 Background NFGEL was established in 1988 as part of the National Forest System of the USDA-Forest Service. The focus of the lab is to address genetic conservation and management of all plant species using a variety of laboratory techniques including DNA analyses. NFGEL services are provided to managers within the Forest Service, other government agencies, and non- government organizations for assessing and monitoring genetic diversity. Purpose of Laboratory The purpose of the Laboratory is to analyze molecular genetic markers (protein and DNA) in plant material submitted by Forest Service employees and those from other cooperating entities. NFGEL provides baseline genetic information, determines the effect of management on the genetic resource, supports genetic improvement program, and contributes information in the support of conservation and restoration programs, especially those involving native and TES (threatened, endangered, and sensitive) species. Alignment to National Strategic Plan for FY04-08 NFGEL’s work aligns to the following National Strategic Plan measures: 1. Goal 1 (Reduce risks from catastrophic wildland fire) 2. Goal 2 (Reduce the impacts from invasive species). 3. Goal 4 (Help meet energy resource needs) 4. Goal 5 (Improve watershed condition) 5. Goal 6 (Mission related work in addition to that which supports the agency goals) NFGEL Projects NFGEL projects were processed to meet a variety of management objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Report
    Biological Report 3093 Beachcomber Drive APN: 065-120-001 Morro Bay, CA Owner: Paul LaPlante Permit #29586 Prepared by V. L. Holland, Ph.D. Plant and Restoration Ecology 1697 El Cerrito Ct. San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Prepared for: John K Construction, Inc. 110 Day Street Nipomo, CA 93444 [email protected] and Paul LaPlante 1935 Beachcomber Drive Morro Bay, CA 93442 March 5, 2013 BIOLOGICAL SURVEY OF 3093 BEACHCOMBER DRIVE, MORRO BAY, CA 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................... 3 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE ...................................................................... 4 LOCATION AND PHYSICAL FEATURES ........................................................ 10 FLORISTIC, VEGETATION, AND WILDLIFE INVENTORY ............................. 11 METHODS ......................................................................................................... 11 RESULTS: FLORA AND VEGETATION ON SITE .......................................... 12 FLORA .............................................................................................................. 12 VEGETATION ..................................................................................................... 13 1. ANTHROPOGENIC (RUDERAL) COMMUNITIES ................................................... 13 2. COASTAL DUNE SCRUB ................................................................................. 15 SPECIAL STATUS PLANT SPECIES ..............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Doggin' America's Beaches
    Doggin’ America’s Beaches A Traveler’s Guide To Dog-Friendly Beaches - (and those that aren’t) Doug Gelbert illustrations by Andrew Chesworth Cruden Bay Books There is always something for an active dog to look forward to at the beach... DOGGIN’ AMERICA’S BEACHES Copyright 2007 by Cruden Bay Books All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system without permission in writing from the Publisher. Cruden Bay Books PO Box 467 Montchanin, DE 19710 www.hikewithyourdog.com International Standard Book Number 978-0-9797074-4-5 “Dogs are our link to paradise...to sit with a dog on a hillside on a glorious afternoon is to be back in Eden, where doing nothing was not boring - it was peace.” - Milan Kundera Ahead On The Trail Your Dog On The Atlantic Ocean Beaches 7 Your Dog On The Gulf Of Mexico Beaches 6 Your Dog On The Pacific Ocean Beaches 7 Your Dog On The Great Lakes Beaches 0 Also... Tips For Taking Your Dog To The Beach 6 Doggin’ The Chesapeake Bay 4 Introduction It is hard to imagine any place a dog is happier than at a beach. Whether running around on the sand, jumping in the water or just lying in the sun, every dog deserves a day at the beach. But all too often dog owners stopping at a sandy stretch of beach are met with signs designed to make hearts - human and canine alike - droop: NO DOGS ON BEACH.
    [Show full text]
  • Industrial Context Work Plan
    LOS ANGELES CITYWIDE HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT Context: Industrial Development, 1850-1980 Prepared for: City of Los Angeles Department of City Planning Office of Historic Resources September 2011; rev. February 2018 The activity which is the subject of this historic context statement has been financed in part with Federal funds from the National Park Service, Department of the Interior, through the California Office of Historic Preservation. However, the contents and opinions do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of the Interior or the California Office of Historic Preservation, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation by the Department of the Interior or the California Office of Historic Preservation. This program receives Federal financial assistance for identification and protection of historic properties. Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, the U.S. Department of the Interior prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, disability, or age in its federally assisted programs. If you believe you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility as described above, or if you desire further information, please write to: Office of Equal Opportunity, National Park Service; 1849 C Street, N.W.; Washington, D.C. 20240 SurveyLA Citywide Historic Context Statement Industrial Development, 1850-1980 TABLE
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Status of California Monarchs
    The Legal Status of Monarch Butterflies in California International Environmental Law Project 2012 IELP Report on Monarch Legal Status The International Environmental Law Project (IELP) is a legal clinic at Lewis & Clark Law School that works to develop, implement, and enforce international environmental law. It works on a range of issues, including wildlife conservation, climate change, and issues relating to trade and the environment. This report was written by the following people from the Lewis & Clark Law School: Jennifer Amiott, Mikio Hisamatsu, Erica Lyman, Steve Moe, Toby McCartt, Jen Smith, Emily Stein, and Chris Wold. Biological information was reviewed by the following individuals from The Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation: Carly Voight, Sarina Jepsen, and Scott Hoffman Black. This report was funded by the Monarch Joint Venture and the Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation. For more information, contact: Chris Wold Associate Professor of Law & Director International Environmental Law Project Lewis & Clark Law School 10015 SW Terwilliger Blvd Portland, OR 97219 USA TEL +1-503-768-6734 FX +1-503-768-6671 E-mail: [email protected] Web: law.lclark.edu/org/ielp Copyright © 2012 International Environmental Law Project and the Xerces Society Photo of overwintering monarchs (Danaus plexippus) clustering on a coast redwood (Sequoia sempervirens) on front cover by Carly Voight, The Xerces Society. IELP Report on Monarch Legal Status Table of Contents Executive Summary .........................................................................................................................v I. Introduction .........................................................................................................................1 II. Regulatory Authority of the California Department of Fish and Game ..............................5 III. Protection for Monarchs in California State Parks and on Other State Lands .....................6 A. Management of California State Parks ....................................................................6 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 1968 General Plan
    I I I I I I MONTEREY COUNTY GENERAL PLAN I MONTEREY COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA I I I I ADOPTED BY THE MONTEREY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION JULY 10, 1968 I ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF MONTEREY COUNTY OCTOBER 22, 1968 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0 N I I I MONTEREY COUNTY I I I I I I PREFACE I The Monterey County General Plan is an attempt to establish a county philosophy based on the values and desires of the people. This in turn becomes a valid basis for decisions by public bodies as well as private enterprise. Such a pro­ cedure is vitally needed in our rapidly changing environment. The General Plan I is a study of the ever changing pattern of Monterey County --a mirror in which to review the past, to comprehend the present, and to contemplate the future, This plan reflects years of research and study as well as many other reports such as I the continuing Facts and Figures, Recreation in Monterey County, Beach Acqui­ sition, and other plans which are shown as separate documents h~cause of the volume of material. I The size of Monterey County, its variety of climate, vegetation, and land forms make it imperative that only large land uses or broad proposals be used to portray geographically the objectives desired for the future development of the County. I Accordingly, in addition to the maps, greater emphasis in the General Plan is placed on the text which conveys in words the objectives as well as the princi­ ples and standards recommended to make them effective.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Pacific Coast Winter Window Survey Results
    2020 Winter Window Survey for Snowy Plovers on U.S. Pacific Coast with 2013-2020 Results for Comparison. Note: blanks indicate no survey was conducted. REGION SITE OWNER 2017 2018 2019 2020 2020 Date Primary Observer(s) Gray's Harbor Copalis Spit State Parks 0 0 0 0 28-Jan C. Sundstrum Conner Creek State Parks 0 0 0 0 28-Jan C. Sundstrum, W. Michaelis Damon Point WDNR 0 0 0 0 30-Jan C. Sundstrum Oyhut Spit WDNR 0 0 0 0 30-Jan C. Sundstrum Ocean Shores to Ocean City 4 10 0 9 28-Jan C. Sundstrum, W. Michaelis County Total 4 10 0 9 Pacific Midway Beach Private, State Parks 22 28 58 66 27-Jan C. Sundstrum, W. Michaelis Graveyard Spit Shoalwater Indian Tribe 0 0 0 0 30-Jan C. Sundstrum, R. Ashley Leadbetter Point NWR USFWS, State Parks 34 3 15 0 11-Feb W. Ritchie South Long Beach Private 6 0 7 0 10-Feb W. Ritchie Benson Beach State Parks 0 0 0 0 20-Jan W. Ritchie County Total 62 31 80 66 Washington Total 66 41 80 75 Clatsop Fort Stevens State Park (Clatsop Spit) ACOE, OPRD 10 19 21 20-Jan T. Pyle, D. Osis DeLaura Beach OPRD No survey Camp Rilea DOD 0 0 0 No survey Sunset Beach OPRD 0 No survey Del Rio Beach OPRD 0 No survey Necanicum Spit OPRD 0 0 0 20-Jan J. Everett, S. Everett Gearhart Beach OPRD 0 No survey Columbia R-Necanicum R. OPRD No survey County Total 0 10 19 21 Tillamook Nehalem Spit OPRD 0 17 26 19-Jan D.
    [Show full text]
  • Mackerricher State Park 24100 Mackerricher Park Road (Off Hwy
    Our Mission The mission of California State Parks is to provide for the health, inspiration and ild harbor seals MacKerricher education of the people of California by helping W to preserve the state’s extraordinary biological State Park diversity, protecting its most valued natural and sun offshore while cultural resources, and creating opportunities for high-quality outdoor recreation. scores of shorebirds forage in mounds of beached kelp at these pristine beaches and California State Parks supports equal access. secluded coves. Prior to arrival, visitors with disabilities who need assistance should contact the park at (707) 937-5804. If you need this publication in an alternate format, contact [email protected]. CALIFORNIA STATE PARKS P.O. Box 942896 Sacramento, CA 94296-0001 For information call: (800) 777-0369 (916) 653-6995, outside the U.S. 711, TTY relay service www.parks.ca.gov MacKerricher State Park 24100 MacKerricher Park Road (off Hwy. 1) Fort Bragg, CA 95437 (707) 937-5804 © 2002 California State Parks (Rev. 2017) M acKerricher State Park’s wild beauty, PLANT COMMUNITIES diverse habitats, and moderate climate The lake area and campgrounds host a forest make this special place on the Mendocino of Bishop and shore pine, Douglas-fir, and Coast a gem among California’s state parks. other types of vegetation that thrive in the Watch harbor seals and migrating gray favorable soil and climate. Dunes topped with whales, stroll on secluded beaches, bicycle sand verbena, sea rocket, sand primrose, beach along an old seaside logging road, and find morning-glory, and grasses produce a palette of yellows, reds, and greens rolling gently across solitude on one of Northern California’s most Inglenook Fen-Ten Mile Dunes Natural Preserve pristine stretches of sand dunes.
    [Show full text]
  • 31 March 2019
    SMBNEP Semi-Annual Report 30 April 2019 SANTA MONICA BAY NATIONAL ESTUARY PROGRAM Semi-Annual Report 1 October 2018 – 31 March 2019 Report Date: 30 April 2019 Prepared for the United States Environmental Protection Agency Semi-Annual Report Overview and Structure This semi-annual report outlines and provides an update for each of the FY19 Work Plan tasks for the time period 1 October 2018 through 31 March 2019, the first semi-annual reporting period for FY19. Many of the FY19 tasks continue past efforts. Each table summarizes the current status and a synthesis of updates for each task. For some tasks requiring more description or discussion, an extended narrative follows the table for that task. Note that the FY19 Work Plan was still based on the 2013 Bay Restoration Plan (BRP) and not the October 2018 Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan (CCMP) Action Plan. The scope of this semi-annual report is broad and structured into three overarching Program Areas to match the structure of the FY19 Work Plan. The Program Area identified as Water Resources and Quality Improvement relates specifically to the BRP Priority Issue: Water Quality; the Program Area identified as Natural Resource Protection and Habitat Restoration relates specifically to the BRP Priority Issue: Natural Resources. There has also been focus and efforts in FY19 on implementing programs that interconnect and integrate issues across traditional boundaries such as climate change and comprehensive monitoring. These interdisciplinary issues that cover a broad range of topics are categorized into the Work Plan Program Area: Multidisciplinary and Integrative Programs. The diagram below illustrates the connection between SMBNEP’s FY19 Work Plan and BRP 2013 Priority Issues.
    [Show full text]