Beyond Feelings a Guide to Critical Thinking

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Beyond Feelings a Guide to Critical Thinking rug38189_FM_i-xii.qxd 1/3/11 4:32 PM Page i Beyond Feelings A Guide to Critical Thinking NINTH EDITION Vincent Ryan Ruggiero Professor Emeritus of Humanities State University of New York, Delhi rug38189_FM_i-xii.qxd 1/3/11 4:32 PM Page ii BEYOND FEELINGS: A GUIDE TO CRITICAL THINKING, NINTH EDITION Published by McGraw-Hill, a business unit of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1221 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10020. Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Previous editions © 2009, 2007 and 2004. No part of this publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written consent of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., including, but not limited to, in any network or other electronic storage or transmission, or broadcast for distance learning. Some ancillaries, including electronic and print components, may not be available to customers outside the United States. This book is printed on acid-free paper. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 DOC/DOC 1 0 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 ISBN: 978-0-07-803818-1 MHID: 0-07-803818-9 Vice President & Editor-in-Chief: Michael Ryan Vice President EDP/Central Publishing Services: Kimberly Meriwether David Editorial Director: Beth Mejia Senior Managing Editor: Meghan Campbell Executive Marketing Manager: Pamela S. Cooper Senior Project Manager: Joyce Watters Buyer: Nicole Baumgartner Design Coordinator: Margarite Reynolds Media Project Manager: Sridevi Palani Compositor: Glyph International Typeface: 10/13 Palatino Printer: R. R. Donnelley All credits appearing on page or at the end of the book are considered to be an extension of the copyright page. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Ruggiero, Vincent Ryan. Beyond feelings: a guide to critical thinking / Vincent Ryan Ruggiero. —9th ed. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-07-803818-1 (alk. paper) 1. Critical thinking. I. Title. BF441.R85 2011 153.4’2—dc22 2010042000 www.mhhe.com rug38189_FM_i-xii.qxd 1/3/11 4:32 PM Page iii To the memory of Howard Trumble, whose quiet practice of the skills detailed in this book was an inspiration to me, to his family, and to all who knew him. rug38189_FM_i-xii.qxd 1/3/11 4:32 PM Page iv rug38189_FM_i-xii.qxd 1/3/11 4:32 PM Page v Contents Preface ix Introduction 1 PART ONE The Context 3 Chapter 1 Who Are You? 4 The Influence of Time and Place 4 The Influence of Ideas 6 The Influence of Mass Culture 7 The “Science” of Manipulation 9 The Influence of Psychology 11 Becoming an Individual 13 Chapter 2 What Is Critical Thinking? 16 Mind, Brain, or Both? 17 Critical Thinking Defined 18 Characteristics of Critical Thinkers 20 The Role of Intuition 22 Basic Activities in Critical Thinking 24 Critical Thinking and Writing 24 Critical Thinking and Discussion 25 Avoiding Plagiarism 27 Chapter 3 What Is Truth? 32 Where Does It All Begin? 33 Imperfect Perception 34 v rug38189_FM_i-xii.qxd 1/3/11 4:32 PM Page vi vi CONTENTS Imperfect Memory 35 Deficient Information 35 Even the Wisest Can Err 36 Truth Is Discovered, Not Created 37 Understanding Cause and Effect 38 Chapter 4 What Does It Mean to Know? 47 Requirements of Knowing 47 Testing Your Own Knowledge 48 How We Come to Know 50 Why Knowing Is Difficult 51 A Cautionary Tale 53 Is Faith a Form of Knowledge? 54 Obstacles to Knowledge 55 Chapter 5 How Good Are Your Opinions? 59 Opinions Can Be Mistaken 61 Opinions on Moral Issues 61 Even Experts Can Be Wrong 63 Kinds of Errors 65 Informed Versus Uninformed Opinion 65 Forming Opinions Responsibly 67 Chapter 6 What Is Evidence? 72 Kinds of Evidence 73 Evaluating Evidence 79 What Constitutes Sufficient Evidence? 80 Chapter 7 What Is Argument? 83 The Parts of an Argument 84 Evaluating Arguments 85 More Difficult Arguments 87 PART TWO The Pitfalls 93 Chapter 8 The Basic Problem: “Mine Is Better” 94 Egocentric People 95 Ethnocentric People 96 Controlling “Mine-Is-Better” Thinking 97 Chapter 9 Errors of Perspective 102 Poverty of Aspect 102 rug38189_FM_i-xii.qxd 1/3/11 4:32 PM Page vii CONTENTS vii Unwarranted Assumptions 104 The Either/Or Outlook 106 Mindless Conformity 107 Absolutism 108 Relativism 108 Bias for or Against Change 109 Chapter 10 Errors of Procedure 115 Biased Consideration of Evidence 115 Double Standard 117 Hasty Conclusion 117 Overgeneralization and Stereotyping 118 Oversimplification 120 The Post Hoc Fallacy 121 Chapter 11 Errors of Expression 126 Contradiction 126 Arguing in a Circle 127 Meaningless Statement 128 Mistaken Authority 129 False Analogy 129 Irrational Appeal 130 Chapter 12 Errors of Reaction 135 Automatic Rejection 137 Changing the Subject 138 Shifting the Burden of Proof 139 Straw Man 139 Attacking the Critic 140 Chapter 13 The Errors in Combination 144 Errors of Perspective 144 Errors of Procedure 146 Errors of Expression 147 Errors of Reaction 149 Sample Combinations of Errors 150 A Sensible View of Terminology 152 PART THREE A Strategy 157 Chapter 14 Knowing Yourself 158 Critical Thinking Inventory 159 rug38189_FM_i-xii.qxd 1/3/11 4:32 PM Page viii viii CONTENTS Using Your Inventory 160 Challenge and Reward 161 Chapter 15 Being Observant 164 Observing People 164 Observation in Science and Medicine 165 The Range of Application 166 Becoming More Observant 168 Reflecting on Your Observations 168 Chapter 16 Selecting an Issue 171 The Basic Rule: Less Is More 171 How to Limit an Issue 172 Sample Issue: Pornography 172 Sample Issue: Boxing 174 Sample Issue: Juvenile Crime 174 Narrowing the Issue Further 176 Chapter 17 Conducting Inquiry 178 Working with Inconclusive Results 178 Where to Look for Information 179 Keeping Focused 187 How Much Inquiry Is Enough? 187 Managing Lengthy Material 190 Chapter 18 Forming a Judgment 192 Evaluating Evidence 193 Evaluating Your Sources’ Arguments 194 Making Important Distinctions 198 Expressing Judgments 199 Chapter 19 Persuading Others 206 Guidelines for Persuasion 206 An Unpersuasive Presentation 215 A Persuasive Presentation 217 Notes 224 Index 233 rug38189_FM_i-xii.qxd 1/3/11 4:32 PM Page ix Preface When the first edition of this book appeared in 1975, the dominant intel- lectual focus was still subjectivity, feelings. That focus, the legacy of the 1960s, was originally a necessary reaction to the rationalism and behav- iorism that preceded it. It declared, in effect: “People are not robots. They are more than the sum total of their physiology. They have hopes, dreams, emotions. No two humans are alike—each has a special perspec- tive, a unique way of perceiving the world. And any view of humanity that ignores this subjective side is a distortion.” Yet, despite its value, the focus on feelings went too far. Like many other movements, what began as a reaction against an extreme view became an extreme view itself. The result of that extremism was the neg- lect of thinking. This book was designed to answer that neglect. The introduction to the first edition explained its rationale as follows: The emphasis on subjectivity served to correct a dangerous oversimplifi- cation. But it is the kind of reaction that cannot be sustained for long without causing an even worse situation—the neglect of thinking. Worse for two reasons. First, because we live in an age of manipulation. Armies of hucksters and demagogues stand ready with the rich resources of psy- chology to play upon our emotions and subconscious needs to persuade us that superficial is profound, harmful is beneficial, evil is virtuous. And feelings are especially vulnerable to such manipulation. Secondly, because in virtually every important area of modern life— law, medicine, government, education, science, business, and community affairs—we are beset with serious problems and complex issues that demand careful gathering and weighing of facts and informed opinions, thoughtful consideration of various conclusions or actions, and judi- cious selection of the best conclusion or most appropriate action. [Today’s college student] has been conditioned not to undervalue subjectivity, but to overvalue it. And so he does not need to have his feel- ings indulged. Rather, he needs to be taught how to sort out his feelings, decide to what extent they have been shaped by external influences, and ix rug38189_FM_i-xii.qxd 1/3/11 4:32 PM Page x x PRFACE evaluate them carefully when they conflict among themselves or with the feelings of others. In short, he needs to be taught to think critically.* There is an unfortunate tendency among many to view feeling and thought as mutually exclusive, to force a choice between them. If we focus on one, then in their view we must reject the other. But this is mis- taken. Feeling and thought are perfectly complementary. Feeling, being more spontaneous, is an excellent beginning to the development of con- clusions. And thought, being more deliberate, provides a way to identify the best and most appropriate feeling. Both are natural. Thinking, however, is less automatic than feeling. To do it well demands a systematic approach and guided practice. The general attitude toward thinking has changed considerably since the mid-1970s. The view that critical thinking is an important skill to which education should give prominence is no longer a minority view. Hundreds of voices have joined the chorus calling for the addition of crit- ical thinking objectives to existing courses and even the creation of spe- cial courses in thinking. There is little disagreement that the challenges of the new millennium demand minds that can move beyond feelings to clear, impartial, critical problem solving and decision making.
Recommended publications
  • Kristof K. P. Vanhoutte, Gavin Fairbairn & Melanie Lang
    Edited by Kristof K. P. Vanhoutte, Gavin Fairbairn & Melanie Lang Bullying and the Abuse of Power Critical Issues Series Editors Dr Robert Fisher Dr Daniel Riha Advisory Board Dr Alejandro Cervantes-Carson Dr Peter Mario Kreuter Professor Margaret Chatterjee Martin McGoldrick Dr Wayne Cristaudo Revd Stephen Morris MiraCrouch ProfessorJohnParry Dr Phil Fitzsimmons Paul Reynolds Professor Asa Kasher Professor Peter Twohig Owen Kelly Professor S Ram Vemuri Revd Dr Kenneth Wilson, O.B.E A Critical Issues research and publications project. http://www.inter-disciplinary.net/critical-issues/ The Ethos Hub ‘Bullying and the Abuse of Power’ 2010 Bullying and the Abuse of Power Edited by Kristof K. P. Vanhoutte, Gavin Fairbairn & Melanie Lang Inter-Disciplinary Press Oxford, United Kingdom © Inter-Disciplinary Press 2010 http://www.inter-disciplinary.net/publishing/id-press/ The Inter-Disciplinary Press is part of Inter-Disciplinary.Net – a global network for research and publishing. The Inter-Disciplinary Press aims to promote and encourage the kind of work which is collaborative, innovative, imaginative, and which provides an exemplar for inter-disciplinary and multi-disciplinary publishing. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior permission of Inter-Disciplinary Press. Inter-Disciplinary Press, Priory House, 149B Wroslyn Road, Freeland, Oxfordshire. OX29 8HR, United Kingdom. +44 (0)1993 882087 ISBN: 978-1-84888-045-0 First published in the United Kingdom in eBook format in 2010. First Edition. Table of Contents Introduction vii Kristof K.P. Vanhoutte, Gavin Fairbairn & Melanie Lang Part 1: The Source of Bullying Sovereign Authority or Leviathan Bully? Kojève on 3 Distinguishing the Use and Abuse of Power Murray S.Y.
    [Show full text]
  • THE HISTORY of ORLANDO FURIOSO
    ElizabethanDrama.org presents the Annotated Popular Edition of THE HISTORY of ORLANDO FURIOSO By Robert Greene Written c. 1590 Earliest Extant Edition: 1594 Featuring complete and easy-to-read annotations. Annotations and notes © Copyright Peter Lukacs and ElizabethanDrama.org, 2020. This annotated play may be freely copied and distributed. THE HISTORY OF ORLANDO FURIOSO BY ROBERT GREENE Written c. 1590 Earliest Extant Edition: 1594 DRAMATIS PERSONÆ. INTRODUCTION to the PLAY Marsilius, Emperor of Africa Robert Greene's Orlando Furioso is a brisk play that Angelica, Daughter to Marsilius. is very loosely based on the great Italian epic poem of the Soldan of Egypt. same name. The storyline makes little logical sense, but Rodomont, King of Cuba. lovers of Elizabethan language will find the play to be enter- Mandricard, King of Mexico. taining, if insubstantial, reading. The highlights of Orlando Brandimart, King of the Isles. Furioso are comprised primarily of the comic scenes of Sacripant, a Count. the hero and knight Orlando, who has gone mad after losing Sacripant's Man. his love, the princess Angelica, interacting with local rustics, Orlando, a French Peer. who in the fashion of the age are, though ostensibly inter- Orgalio, Page to Orlando. national, thoroughly English. Though never to be confused Medor, Friend to Angelica. with the greatest works of the age, Greene's Orlando de- serves to be read, and perhaps even occasionally staged. French Peers: Ogier. OUR PLAY'S SOURCE Namus. Oliver. The text of this play was originally adapted from the Turpin. 1876 edition of Greene's plays edited by Alexander Dyce, Several other of the Twelve Peers of France, whose but was then carefully compared to the original 1594 quarto.
    [Show full text]
  • Jonesexcerpt.Pdf
    2 The Texts—An Overview N’ot que trois gestes en France la garnie; ne cuit que ja nus de ce me desdie. Des rois de France est la plus seignorie, et l’autre aprés, bien est droiz que jeu die, fu de Doon a la barbe florie, cil de Maience qui molt ot baronnie. De ce lingnaje, ou tant ot de boidie, fu Ganelon, qui, par sa tricherie, en grant dolor mist France la garnie. La tierce geste, qui molt fist a prisier, fu de Garin de Monglenne au vis fier. Einz roi de France ne vodrent jor boisier; lor droit seignor se penerent d’aidier, . Crestïenté firent molt essaucier. [There were only threegestes in wealthy France; I don’t think any- one would ever contradict me on this. The most illustrious is the geste of the kings of France; and the next, it is right for me to say, was the geste of white-beardedPROOF Doon de Mayence. To this lineage, which was full of disloyalty, belonged Ganelon, who, by his duplic- ity, plunged France into great distress. The thirdgeste , remarkably worthy, was of the fierce Garin de Monglane. Those of his lineage never once sought to deceive the king of France; they strove to help their rightful lord, . and they advanced Christianity.] Bertrand de Bar-sur-Aube, Girart de Vienne Since the Middle Ages, the corpus of chansons de geste has been di- vided into groups based on various criteria. In the above prologue to the thirteenth-century Girart de Vienne, Bertrand de Bar-sur-Aube classifies An Introduction to the Chansons de Geste by Catherine M.
    [Show full text]
  • Contact the Phoenix Project
    CONTACT THE PHOENIX PROJECT “YE SHALL KNOW THE TRUTH AND THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU MAD!n VOLUME 7, NUMBER 10 NEWS REVIEW $ 3.00 JANUARY 3, 1995 SpotlightNow l?h$zg On Arkansas Gov. Guy Tucker Free RichardWavne Snell! J/2/95 #l HATONN EDITORIAL TO GOVERNOR GUY TUCKER, ARKANSAS: * Mr. Tucker-the eyes of the WORLD are focused ON YOU. We know you INSIDE THIS ISSUE thought the opening of 1995 would be parades of roses and re-inforced rings- through-noses as the New World Order settles in for the FINAL KILL. NO SIR, To Better See Our Plight, Look To Canadian Parasites, p.2 we-the-people are not only not going to march to the ring-bear-er, we aregoing to hang rings on or about the alternativeportions of anatomy of the PARASITES The (C.I.A.) Pipeline, Part XII, p.6 who have taken our FREE NATION which was once UNDER GOD WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE for ALL. Recent Sky Activity Is Secret Technology In Action, p.8 As you will find as you turn through this paper- WE KNOW!! We KNOW Donahue Show Tries To Railroad Militias, p.8 all about the antics and total miscarriage of all Justice in our sick judicial system and throughout the so-called *‘government(s)” of our also ONCE Great Parasites, Pets And Other Ethical Matters, p. 12 Nation. You have opportunity here, with the spotlight shining directly upon your Criminal Benchwarming Judges? Keep Patriot SpotIight Blazing, p. 14 person-to SERVE: the people, God and OUR Country.
    [Show full text]
  • Information to Users
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter 6ce, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6” x 9” black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI A Bell & Howell Infoimation Company 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor Ml 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 FICTION, REALITY, AND FEMALE SUICIDE DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Elizabeth L.
    [Show full text]
  • As Above, So Below. Astrology and the Inquisition in Seventeenth-Century New Spain
    Department of History and Civilization As Above, So Below. Astrology and the Inquisition in Seventeenth-Century New Spain Ana Avalos Thesis submitted for assessment with a view to obtaining the degree of Doctor of History and Civilization of the European University Institute Florence, February 2007 EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE Department of History and Civilization As Above, So Below. Astrology and the Inquisition in Seventeenth-Century New Spain Ana Avalos Thesis submitted for assessment with a view to obtaining the degree of Doctor of History and Civilization of the European University Institute Examining Board: Prof. Peter Becker, Johannes-Kepler-Universität Linz Institut für Neuere Geschichte und Zeitgeschichte (Supervisor) Prof. Víctor Navarro Brotons, Istituto de Historia de la Ciencia y Documentación “López Piñero” (External Supervisor) Prof. Antonella Romano, European University Institute Prof. Perla Chinchilla Pawling, Universidad Iberoamericana © 2007, Ana Avalos No part of this thesis may be copied, reproduced or transmitted without prior permission of the author A Bernardo y Lupita. ‘That which is above is like that which is below and that which is below is like that which is above, to achieve the wonders of the one thing…’ Hermes Trismegistus Contents Acknowledgements 4 Abbreviations 5 Introduction 6 1. The place of astrology in the history of the Scientific Revolution 7 2. The place of astrology in the history of the Inquisition 13 3. Astrology and the Inquisition in seventeenth-century New Spain 17 Chapter 1. Early Modern Astrology: a Question of Discipline? 24 1.1. The astrological tradition 27 1.2. Astrological practice 32 1.3. Astrology and medicine in the New World 41 1.4.
    [Show full text]
  • ROSALIND-The-Facts-T
    THE PLAY “AS YOU LIKE IT” THE WOMAN ROSALIND THE FACTS WRITTEN: The year of 1599 was an especially busy year for Williams Shakespeare who wrote four plays for the Globe stage – “Much Ado About Nothing”, “Henry V”, “Julius Caesar” and “As You Like It”. PUBLISHED: The play was first published in the famous First Folio of 1923 AGE: The Bard was 35 years old when he wrote the play. (Born 1564-Died 1616) CHRONO: “As You Like It” holds the 21st position in the canon of 39 plays immediately after “Julius Caesar” and before “Hamlet” in 1601 GENRE: The play is most often joined with “The Two Gentlemen of Verona” and “The Comedy of Errors” to comprise the trio of “Early Comedies”. SOURCE: Shakespeare’s principal source was a prose pastoral romance, “Rosalynd”, published in 1590 by the English poet Thomas Lodge and “improved upon beyond measure” (Bloom); the two key characters of Touchstone and Jaques were Shakespeare’s memorable creations. TIMELINE: The action of the play covers a brief number of weeks allowing for the “to-ing & fro-ing” of getting from the Palace to the Forest. FIRST PERFORMANCE: The play’s first performance is uncertain although a performance at Wilton House – an English country house outside of London and the seat of the Earl of Pembroke – has been suggested as a possibility. The play’s popularity must surely have found its place in frequent Globe seasons but no records seem to attest to that fact. Page 2 “PASTORALS”: “There is a unique bucolic bliss that is conventional in pastorals, for it is common for people trapped in the hurly-burly of the crowded haunts of men to imagine wrongly that there is some delight in a simple life that existed in the ‘good old days’.
    [Show full text]
  • A Uses and Gratifications Perspective of the Relationships Among Consumption of Government-Conspiracy-Theory-Oriented Media Fare
    A Uses and Gratifications Perspective of the Relationships among Consumption of Government-Conspiracy-Theory-Oriented Media Fare, Trust in Government, and Political Participation A dissertation submitted to the College of Communication and Information of Kent State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Communication Studies by Rekha Sharma August, 2017 Dissertation written by Rekha Sharma B.S., Kent State University, 2002 M.A., Kent State University, 2004 M.S., Kent State University, 2004 Ph.D., Kent State University, 2017 Approved by ________________________________ Paul M. Haridakis, Ph.D., Chair, Doctoral Dissertation Committee ________________________________ Danielle S. Coombs, Ph.D., Member, Doctoral Dissertation Committee ________________________________ Janet R. Meyer, Ph.D., Member, Doctoral Dissertation Committee ________________________________ James D. Ponder, Ph.D., Member, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Accepted by _________________________________ Elizabeth Graham, Ph.D., Director, School of Communication Studies _________________________________ Amy Reynolds, Ph.D., Dean, College of Communication and Information ii Table of Contents Page TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................... iii LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................v LIST OF TABLES .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Arkansas Supreme Court Project Arkansas Supreme Court Historical Society Interview with Ray Thornton Little Rock, Arkansas September 20, 2011
    This oral history with former Justice Ray Thornton was conducted in two parts, on September 20, 2011, by Scott Lunsford of the David and Barbara Pryor Center for Oral and Visual History at the University of Arkansas and on February 21, 2013, by Ernest Dumas. The second interview goes into more detail on some aspects of his political career, particularly the Supreme Court. The Dumas interview follows the end of the Lunsford interview. Arkansas Supreme Court Project Arkansas Supreme Court Historical Society Interview with Ray Thornton Little Rock, Arkansas September 20, 2011 Interviewer: Scott Lunsford Scott Lunsford: Today’s date is September 20 and the year is 2011 and we’re in Little Rock at 1 Gay Place. I’m sorry, I don’t know the name of the person whose residence we are at, but we decided we wanted kind of a quiet, withdrawn place to do this interview and Julie Baldridge, your loyal helper… Ray Thornton: She and I have worked together for many years and she is really an extraordinary person. And on this day she has just been named the interim director of the Arkansas Scholarship Lottery Commission staff in Little Rock. SL: That’s a great honor. RT: Well, it is for her and she deserves it. SL: Well, we’re very grateful for her help in finding this place and getting us together. Let me say first that it is a great honor to be sitting across from you and I’ve looked forward to this for some time. Now, let me give you a brief description of what we’re doing here.
    [Show full text]
  • Finding Voice
    Finding Voice by Bonnie Nish B.A., University of Toronto, 1985 Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the Arts Education Program Faculty of Education © Bonnie Nish 2012 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Fall 2012 All rights reserved. However, in accordance with the Copyright Act of Canada, this work may be reproduced, without authorization, under the conditions for “Fair Dealing.” Therefore, limited reproduction of this work for the purposes of private study, research, criticism, review and news reporting is likely to be in accordance with the law, particularly if cited appropriately. Approval Name: Bonnie Nish Degree: Master of Arts Education Title of Thesis: Finding Voice Examining Committee: Chair: Allan McKinnon, Associate Professor Carolyn Mamchur Senior Supervisor Professor Celeste Snowber Supervisor Professor David Paterson External Examiner Associate Dean, Undergraduate, Education Simon Fraser University Date Defended/Approved: November 15, 2012 ii Partial Copyright Licence iii Abstract Individuation, as defined by Jung, is a process that we go through which allows us to examine who we are as we delve into our shadows. These shadows both shape and constrain us as teachers, as partners, as parents and as human beings. As we seek to uncover all the hidden meanings, we throw off the constraints imposed upon us by the world. We are then able to mine our inner depths in order that we may discover our authentic selves. Having gone through this process, we as educators and artists, have some profound messages to bring to our students, and the world around us. Through the use of both poetic inquiry and autobiographical inquiry I illustrate how Jung’s theory of the process of individuation works.
    [Show full text]
  • 0 Musical Borrowing in Hip-Hop
    MUSICAL BORROWING IN HIP-HOP MUSIC: THEORETICAL FRAMEWORKS AND CASE STUDIES Justin A. Williams, BA, MMus Thesis submitted to the University of Nottingham for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy September 2009 0 Musical Borrowing in Hip-hop Music: Theoretical Frameworks and Case Studies Justin A. Williams ABSTRACT ‗Musical Borrowing in Hip-hop‘ begins with a crucial premise: the hip-hop world, as an imagined community, regards unconcealed intertextuality as integral to the production and reception of its artistic culture. In other words, borrowing, in its multidimensional forms and manifestations, is central to the aesthetics of hip-hop. This study of borrowing in hip-hop music, which transcends narrow discourses on ‗sampling‘ (digital sampling), illustrates the variety of ways that one can borrow from a source text or trope, and ways that audiences identify and respond to these practices. Another function of this thesis is to initiate a more nuanced discourse in hip-hop studies, to allow for the number of intertextual avenues travelled within hip-hop recordings, and to present academic frameworks with which to study them. The following five chapters provide case studies that prove that musical borrowing, part and parcel of hip-hop aesthetics, occurs on multiple planes and within myriad dimensions. These case studies include borrowing from the internal past of the genre (Ch. 1), the use of jazz and its reception as an ‗art music‘ within hip-hop (Ch. 2), borrowing and mixing intended for listening spaces such as the automobile (Ch. 3), sampling the voice of rap artists posthumously (Ch. 4), and sampling and borrowing as lineage within the gangsta rap subgenre (Ch.
    [Show full text]
  • PONDER REVIEW Volume 2 • Issue 2 Fall 2018 PONDER REVIEW
    PONDER REVIEW Volume 2 • Issue 2 Fall 2018 PONDER REVIEW Editors Jacqueline Clowney, Madelain Garcia, Elizabeth Hines, William Kessler, Lauren Ostrander, Daniel Putney, Lauren Rhoades, Thomas Richardson, Bailey Hammond Robertson, Maggie Sanderson Advisor Brandy Wilson Ponder Review is published bi-annually by the low-residency MFA program in creative writing at Mississippi University for Women. The views expressed herein are those of the writers, not the editors or Mississippi University for Women. Ponder Review considers new media, visual art, creative nonfiction, fiction, flash fiction, and poetry twice a year from December 15 – March 15 and June 15 – September 15. No previously published material will be accepted. See our website for full submission guidelines: PonderReview.com Single copies are $12 and subscriptions are $20 per year for addresses within the United States. Foreign postage is additional. For submissions and subscriptions use Submittable: ponderreview.submittable.com All rights revert to the authors after publication; however, we reserve the right to reprint online and in anthologies of the magazine. For the rights to perform plays or to reprint any work published in Ponder Review, please contact the author. As a courtesy, the editors are willing to assist in establishing contact whenever possible. We request Ponder Review be credited with initial publication. Queries or other correspondence may be emailed to: [email protected]. Queries and subscriptions sent by mail should be addressed to: The Editors, Ponder Review, MFA Creative Writing, 1100 College St., W-1634, Columbus, MS 39701. ISSN 2572-6455 (print) ISSN 2572-6463 (online) Copyright © 2018 Mississippi University for Women Cover Art by Seungkyung Oh • “Cactus Woman” A Note to Readers As we at Ponder Review close out our second year of publishing thought-provoking pieces of literature, art, and new media, we continue to discuss our identity as a magazine.
    [Show full text]