Combat Control System (CCS) Mk 2

AN/BYG-1(V) Combat Control System (CCS) Mk 2

Status: In Production System Type: Naval C4I System (Submarine) Program Briefing The AN/BYG-1(V) Combat Con- The first new CCS Mk 2 Block 1C In September 2002, Australia de- trol System (CCS) Mk 2 is a subma- was installed on a Los Angeles class cided to acquire six CCS Mk 2-based rine weapons and tactical control sub, but now CCS Mk 2/BYG-1 is systems for its Collins class subs, un- system, originally developed as a common to all submarine classes in der a $220 million project. The pro- three-phase US Navy program for the US Navy, including new Vir- duction contract was awarded to transforming several legacy subma- ginias, with well over 75 systems in Raytheon in July 2003, with these rine combat systems (AN/BSY-1, service. Essentially, all US Navy subs systems first receiving the AN/BYG- CCS Mk 1, CCS Mk 2 D(0), and now share only two major C4I/sonar 1 designation. DWS-118) to a common, more capa- systems – Raytheon’s CCS Mk Major CCS Mk 2/BYG-1 produc- ble and flexible COTS/Open System 2/BYG-1 and Lockheed Martin’s tion, upgrade, and support continue. Architecture (OSA) system. AN/BQQ-10(V) Acoustic-Rapid COTS Insertion (A-RCI) sonar system.

Executive US Navy Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) 2531 Jefferson Davis Highway Washington, DC 20362-5101 tel: (703) 602-1556 Manufacturers

Primes General Dynamics Raytheon Systems Co. Advanced Information Systems (GD AIS) Portsmouth Operation 12350 Fair Lakes Circle 1847 West Main Rd. Fairfax, VA 22033 P.O. Box 360 (was Digital System Resources) Portsmouth, RI 02871 (Tactical Control System [TCS]) tel: (401) 847-8000 (GD AIS originally earned about 15% of CCS Mk 2 funding) fax: (401) 847-2364 ($28.1M, 12/02; $34.7M, 11/03; $14.1M, 1/05; $10.2M, 2/06) (20% of work in 2017) (Original prime; weapon control system) (50% of work in 2017 is small businesses)

Subcontractors  Anteon: COTS hardware ($4M,  Lockheed Martin (LM-MSS),  Systems Engineering Associates 05; $2M, FY05) Manassas, VA: Tech Insertion (TI) (SEACORP), Middletown, RI:  DDL Omni: COTS hardware and & APB Software integration Technical support services software (05) (FY15-17+) ($15.2M, 6/02)  EG&G: Installations  MITRE: COTS hardware ($1.5M,  Thales: CCS Mk 2 hardware and  General Dynamics AIS, Pittsfield, 05; $0.5M, FY05 [continuing]) software for Australia ($16.2M, MA: Tech Insertion (TI) & APB  Progeny, Manassas, VA: Informa- 10/03) Software integration (FY15-17+) tion Assurance (Major subcontrac- tor [3/19]; FY15-20+)

© Teal Group Corporation Military Electronics Briefing August 2019 AN/BYG-1(V) Combat Control System (CCS) Mk 2 Page 2 Functional Description Configuration lows the submarine Navy to rapidly Variants/Related Systems The Combat Control System update the ship safety tactical picture, There were four versions of the (CCS) Mk 2 (AN/BYG-1(V)) is a integrates the common tactical picture original CCS Mk 2: submarine-based fire control system into the battle group, improves tor- Mod 0—For Los Angeles class sub- that provides fire control data for Mk pedo interfaces, and provides tactical marines without vertical launch tubes 48 ADCAP torpedoes, Tomahawk Tomahawk (Tomahawk Block IV) (SSN-688 through SSN-718). This and Harpoon missiles, and counter- capability. CCS Mk 2 version replaces the CCS measures. The CCS Mk 2 was origi- PE# 0604562N funding was pro- Mk 1 system in these subs. nally a successor to the CCS Mk 1 and vided in FY05 to explore the feasibil- Mod 1—For Los Angeles class sub- Mk 118 fire control systems aboard ity of an alternative concept to the marines with vertical launch tubes but Los Angeles (SSN-688) and Ohio current process for submarine mainte- no AN/BSY-1 (SSN-719 through (SSBN-726) class submarines. To- nance, training and logistics infra- SSN-725, and SSN-750). This also day’s CCS Mk 2 is a much broader structure for the AN/BYG-1 system. replaces the CCS Mk 1. COTS/OSA weapon control and tac- A submarine maintenance free oper- tical control system replacement for ating period would minimize the need Mod 2—For Los Angeles class sub- several combat systems. for maintenance support products, marines with vertical launch tubes PE# 0604562N develops COTS maintenance training/trainers and and the AN/BSY-1 (SSN-751 based software and hardware up- maintenance and logistics infrastruc- through SSN-779). Mod 2 lacks an grades to integrate improved weapons tures by developing a highly available attack console, having instead a weap- and tactical control capabilities for submarine combat system. At-sea ons launch console. multiple submarine classes (SSN- maintenance would be by keyboard Mod 3—For Ohio class ballistic mis- 688, -688I, SSGN, Seawolf, and Vir- action only and Original Equipment sile submarines (SSBN-726 through ginia). Manufacturers (OEM) would provide SSBN-743). This variant controls PE# 0604562N also accommo- pier-side maintenance and supply only torpedoes and countermeasures, dates the annual integration of Ad- support. This would allow operators and replaces the Mk 118 Fire Control vanced Processing Builds (APBs) to focus on system employment ver- System. It lacks the AN/UYK-44 software to both tactical control sus system maintenance, while har- processor, because it does not handle (APB(T)) and weapon control nessing commercial processes and Tomahawk or Harpoon missiles. It (APB(W)) subsystems. The tactical infrastructure for maintenance train- has four Mk 130 consoles and one Mk control integration effort incorporates ing and supply support. 92 Mod 1 attack-control console. The the integration of other sensor (ESM, CCS Mk 2 Mod 3 is associated with Platforms sonar, radar, etc.) inputs to provide a the AN/BQQ-5E(V)4 sonar system. The CCS Mk 2 is carried aboard common operation picture and im- Los Angeles (SSN-688) and Virginia AN/BSY-1(V) SUBACS—This is prove situational awareness in an in- (SSN-774) class fast attack subma- the designation for the Submarine Ad- formation assurance (IA) compliant rines, Ohio (SSBN-726) class Trident vanced Combat System, derived from environment. The weapon control de- ballistic missile submarines, and the the original SUBACS Basic system. It velopment effort provides improve- Seawolf (SSN-21) class. The Austra- was in service on later SSN-688 Los ments to the weapons control lian Collins class will also mount a Angeles class nuclear attack subma- subsystem based on improvements to CCS Mk 2-based system. rines (SSN-751 on). missiles and torpedos. AN/BYG-1 al- Contract Briefs The following is a listing of con- ified prime contracts with a base value tract announcements that have been of $5 million or more since the begin- made by the Pentagon involving the ning of FY88 (10/1/87). award of, or modification to, unclass-

Date Contract Number Agency Obligation Details Digital Systems Resources 12/13/2002 N00024-03-C-6206 NAVSEA $28,135,728 CPI/AF contract for development of the Tactical Control System (TCS) under the CCS Mk2 Combat Control program.

August 2019 Military Electronics Briefing © Teal Group Corporation Page 3 AN/BYG-1(V) Combat Control System (CCS) Mk 2

General Dynamics, Advanced Information Systems 1/4/2005 N00024-03-C-6206 NAVSEA $14,051,775 CPIF/CPAF modification to previously awarded contract for engineering and procurement of integrated electronic equipment cabi- nets in support of the weapons control system under the CCS Mk2 combat control program. 2/16/2006 N00024-03-C-6206 NAVSEA $10,168,700 CPIF/CPAF modification under previously awarded contract for continuation of engineering services work in the development of the next generation of Combat Control System Mk2, Weapons Control subsystem development. Raytheon, Electronic Systems 11/22/2006 N00024-03-C-6207 NAVSEA $5,507,984 CPFF modification under a previously awarded contract to exercise an option for additional engineering services and incidental material/travel/subsistence in support of the AN/BYG-1 Combat Control System. 2/5/2007 N00024-03-C-6207 NAVSEA $9,587,820 CPFF modification under a previously awarded contract for an additional 72,306 hours of engineering services in support of the AN/BYG-1 Combat Control System. Funding History RDT&E ($ Millions) FY12 FY13* FY14** FY15 FY16* FY17 FY18 FY19* FY20** FY21** PE# 0604562N Submarine Tactical Warfare System 47.3 49.1 49.1 37.8 52.7 50.1 44.7 80.3 62.4 63.7 Procurement ($ Millions) FY12 FY13* FY14 FY15 FY16* FY17 FY18 FY19* FY20** FY21** Navy Other Procurement (OPN) BA 4: Ordnance Support Equipment SSN Combat Control Systems 89.2 71.3 73.1 60.8 96.0 144.7 147.0 125.9 145.5 176.1 *Appropriation **Request NOTE: PE# 0604562N RDT&E funding is predominantly for the CCS Mk 2/BYG-1 NOTE: SSN Combat Control Systems primarily funds the CCS Mk 2/BYG-1 Costs Contract awards have indicated CCS Mk 2 unit cost for Virginia class submarines is only about $6 million, but overall funding is much higher than this. Program Overview

History CCS Mk 2 Development CCS Mk 2 Program D(0) Block ments Tomahawk Block 3 Phase III Development of the CCS Mk 2 1: BSY-1 Integration (Los An- (Tomahawk Strike Planning System) began during the mid-1980s, when the geles class) and ADCAP torpedo improvements. Navy wanted a new fire control sys- CCS Mk 2 Program D(0) Block 1 It also interfaces with the Joint Mari- tem for the Los Angeles class subma- integrates CCS Mk 2 into the time Command Information System rines, which would be capable of AN/BSY-1, replaces additional obso- (JMCIS). providing faster target data and have lete equipment, updates the World CCS Mk 2 Program D(0) Block better displays. Raytheon won the Vector Shoreline database and incor- 1C: Virginia class CCS Mk 2 development contract in porates a direct GPS interface, incor- In August 1996, NAVSEA issued September 1988. porates the Navy Tactical Command Raytheon a $41.5 million maximum System-Afloat (NTCS-A), and imple- price cost-plus-incentive-fee (CPIF)

© Teal Group Corporation Military Electronics Briefing August 2019 AN/BYG-1(V) Combat Control System (CCS) Mk 2 Page 4 contract with a not-to-exceed (NTE) Navy originally planned for late 2003. The Digital System Resources target cost-plus-target fee (CPTF) for Construction of the first sub could contract stated that work would be development of the Block 1C upgrade begin in 2006, with the lead sub to be conducted in Middleton, MD (20%); to the Mk2 CCS. The work is to be delivered in 2010. Raytheon will McLean, VA (5%); Waterford, CT conducted in Portsmouth, RI (95%) probably offer a combat system based (4%); Fairfax, VA (54%); and in and Waltham, MA (5%), and com- on the CCS Mk 2, with Lockheed Pittsfield, MA (17%), Raytheon pleted in April 1999. Martin offering its COTS open archi- would do its work in Portsmouth, RI Phase I (CCS Mk 2 Block 1C) in tecture SUBICS (Submarine Inte- (68%); Fairfax, VA (11%); Middle- FY00 introduced automated strike en- grated Combat System). town, RI (7%); Fort Worth, TX (4%); gagement planning capability Lockheed Martin has already of- San Diego, CA (3%); Roswell, GA (ATWCS) and Virginia class data dis- fered SUBICS (based on the Acous- (3%); Tiverton, RI (2%); Manassas, tribution and services. tic-Rapid COTS Insertion [A-RCI] VA (1%); and Beverly Hills, CA Phase II (Block 1C ECP 4) in FY02 program for the US Navy), and (1%). Both actions would be com- introduced advanced weapons im- Raytheon has offered CCS Mk 2, to pleted in December 2003. Contract provements and processing with the Spain for a new-build submarine pro- funding for both will be allocated installation of the Virginia class gram planned for 2003. from the Navy Surface Combatant equivalent COTS processors, replaces There are also possibilities in Combat System (PE# 0604307N) AN/UYK-43 computers and supports Egypt for new-build subs, and in In- (N00024-03-C-6206/N00024-03-C Tactical Tomahawk missile and dia, Brazil, and Colombia for mid-life -6207). weapon control system (TTCWS), the upgrades. Collins Production for ADCAP CBASS torpedo, and im- Potential $370 Million CCS Mk Raytheon proved mining (ISLMM) capabilities. 2 Contracts: TCS and WCS In July 2003, NAVSEA awarded Phase III (Block 1C ECP 5) in In December 2002, after receiving Raytheon Integrated Defense Sys- FY07 will install Virginia class weap- four bid proposals, NAVSEA issued tems a $32.4 million CPIF/CPAF ons-launch improvements and pro- Digital System Resources (Fairfax, add-on to exercise an option to provides an at-sea end-to-end launcher VA) a $28.1 million cost-plus-incen- vide systems engineering and techni- testing capability. tive/Cost-plus-award-fee cal services, and the production of BSY-2 Integration (Seawolf (CPIF/CPAF) contract to fund the de- five CCS Mk 2 1C ECP004 (now class) velopment of a Tactical Control Sys- designated AN/BYG-1) Mod 6 vari- AN/BSY-2 upgrade work from tem (TCS) under the CCS Mk 2 ants that are to be installed on Royal early this decade includes A-RCI(V)5 program. The TCS is a segregated Australian Collins class submarine development for Seawolf and plans to portion of the CCS Mk 2 baseline platforms. The work is to be per- integrate a CCS Mk 2 variant into program that includes ECP 004, to be formed in Portsmouth, RI, and is to be BSY-2. installed on al submarine classes. The completed by April 2006. Contract award contains (four one-year) op- financing will come from the Foreign $220 Million Collins Contract tions, which if exercised, would bring Military Sales (FMS) account In September 2002, Australia de- the cumulative value of the contract to (N00024-03-C-6207). cided to acquire six CCS Mk 2-based more than $169 million. POC is Ms. systems for its Collins class subs, un- CCS Mk 2 Loses in Spain Veronica S. Brimmer der a $220 million project. Raytheon In July 2005, Spain chose Lock- ([email protected]). beat out the Anglo-German STN At- heed Martin Maritime Systems & At the same time, NAVSEA las (a joint venture of Rheinmetall and Sensors (MS2), Manassas, VA, to awarded Raytheon (Portsmouth, RI) a BAE Systems) ISUS 90 combat sys- help build the combat system for its $20.2 million CPIF/CPAF, award af- tem. planned S-80A diesel electric subma- ter receiving two offers, to finance rines. Lockheed will help develop a Competitions for Taiwan and development of the Weapons Control system based on its SUBICS (Subma- Other Subs System (WCS) under the CCS Mk 2 rine Integrated Combat System) and In December 2002, the US Navy program. The WCS is also a segre- A-RCI, to include open architecture announced it will limit the competi- gated portion of the CCS Mk 2 base- sonar, command and control, and tion to supply 8 diesel attack subma- line program that includes ECP 004, weapons control systems. Losing bid- rines for Taiwan to: General to be installed on al submarine ders included Raytheon (based on its Dynamics and Northrop Grumman classes. The award also contained CCS Mk 2, with Atlas Elektronik or (builders) and Lockheed Martin and (four one-year) options, which if ex- Thales sonars), Thales (Paris, Raytheon (systems integrators). A ercised, would bring the cumulative France), Kongsberg Gruppen formal NAVSEA RFP was expected value to more than $205 million. (Kongsberg, Norway), and Atlas in 2QFY03, with selection by the Elektronik (Bremen, Germany

August 2019 Military Electronics Briefing © Teal Group Corporation Page 5 AN/BYG-1(V) Combat Control System (CCS) Mk 2

[owned by BAE Systems]). Atlas was The Navy plans to begin buying nications, Computers and Intelli- the recent favorite, with its widely two Virginia-class (SSN-774) subma- gence (C4I) Systems Div. The firms proven ISUS 90 diesel electric sub rines per year in 2012 – if per ship receiving indefinite-delivery/indefi- combat system. The combat system costs are reduced from $2.4 billion to nite-quantity (ID/IQ) contracts were program could be worth more than $2 billion – but will also begin decom- the Aviation and Marine services Div. $300 million, for the initial four subs, missioning Los Angeles-class attack of L-3 Communications’ Titan Corp. to enter service from 2011. submarines (SSN-668) at a rate of in Marlton, NJ; Science Applications four per year beginning in 2013. In International’s Technology Services SWFTS any case, two Virginias per year will Group in San Diego, CA; and SERCO In March 2006, NAVSEA not actually be built until after our in Vienna, VA. awarded Lockheed Martin Integrated forecast period. Not until 2021 will SPAWAR SYSCEN-San Diego Systems, Bethesda, MD, a $17.4 mil- half the sub force will be made up of issued ID/IQ contracts with cost-plus- lion cost-plus-fixed-fee CPFF) con- the Virginia-class. fixed-fee (CPFF pricing of $38.7 mil- tract to finance systems engineering There have been continuing calls lion to Titan Corp; $34.9 million to and integration in support of Combat to up Virginia production to two per Science Applications International; SWFTS (System Warfare Federated year, especially if costs can be re- and $33.3 million to SERCO, to sup- Tactical Systems), the system that is duced, but with the Navy already port Submarine C4I Systems Div. composed of all submarine combat planning more more ships than they with technical support services for system subsystems, mainly consult- can afford (even if DD(X)is cancelled submarine and satellite communica- ation, command, control, communi- again), we will wait before we alter tion, information technology (IT), cations, computers, and intelligence our production forecast. and other C4I efforts. Each of the (C5I). The contract was competitively contracts awarded is to run for a three- awarded via advertisements on the CCS Contracts year period, and have two one-year Navy Electronic Commerce On-line In January 2007, NAVSEA issued options. This would increase the cu- website, with two proposals solicited Lockheed Martin, Maritime Systems mulative contract value by varying and received. The effort provides for and Sensors, Manassas, VA, a $5.2 amounts, depending upon the con- the overall architecture integration of million CPAF modification to exer- tract recipient. the subsystems to achieve a single cise an option for engineering services The work is to be conducted in combat system for naval battlegroup and material, travel, and subsistence, primarily in San Diego, CA, with interconnectivity. The work is to be in support of the Combat Control Sys- small amounts at the contractor’s base conducted in Manassas, VA (44%); tem (CCS) Structurally Integrated En- location (in the case of Titan and Middletown, RI (12%); San Antonio, closure CC 3-Bay program. The work SERCO). Contract funding will come TX (8%); Groton, CT (7%); Wood- is to be conducted in Manassas, VA, from Navy O&M as task orders are bridge, VA (7%); Newport, RI (7%); and is to be completed by December competed for and won by one of the Riverdale, MD (5%); Canton, IL 2007. Contract financing will come three companies. The awards are the (3%); Greensboro, NC (3%); Be- from Navy O&M accounts (N00024- result of a SPAWAR SYSCEN solici- thesda, MD (2%); North Waterford, 06-C-6243). tation published on the Federal Busi- CT (3%); and Mystic, CT (1%), and In February 2007, NAVSEA is- ness Opportunity website is to be completed by December 2006. sued Raytheon a $9.6 million CPFF (N66001-06-R-0018). There were Contract funding will be allocated modification to exercise an option for only three respondees to the solicita- from the Navy O&M account an additional 72,306 hours of engi- tion (N66001-07-D-0014—Titan (N00024-06-C-6272). neering services in support of the Corp; N66001-07-D-0015—Science BYG-1. The work is being performed USN Submarine Plans applications; N66001-07-D- in Portsmouth, RI, and is to be com- The USS Virginia (SSN-774) has 0013—SERCO). pleted by December 2007. Contract already been commissioned. The USS financing will come from Navy O&M Advanced ASW Technologies Texas (SSN-775) completed intitial (N00024-03-C-6207). Solicitation sea trials in May 2006, and is to be In October 2007, NAVSEA an- delivered to the Navy in June. Six Submarine C4I Contracts nounced that its Advanced Develop- additional subs were under construc- In November 2006, the Space and ment Office for Undersea Warfare tion in May 2006, with a total of nine Naval Warfare Command’s Systems (formerly Advanced Systems and under contract. The USS Hawaii Center (SPAWAR SYSCEN), San Technology Office or ASTO) within (SSN-776) is to be delivered in 2007, Diego, CA, reported the release of the Program Executive Office for In- the USS North Carolina (SSN-777) in contracts to three competing compa- tegrated Warfare Systems (PEO 2008, with the USS New Hampshire nies to fund support services for its IWS), Washington Navy Yard, (SSN-778) and USS New Mexico Submarine Communication Informa- Washington, DC, is soliciting engi- (SSN-779) to follow. tion and Command, Control Commu-

© Teal Group Corporation Military Electronics Briefing August 2019 AN/BYG-1(V) Combat Control System (CCS) Mk 2 Page 6 neering services for advanced soft- [email protected], tel: (202) 781- improvements to missiles and torpe- ware and hardware technology im- 3920. Two separate draft RFPs are does. The BYG-1 allows the subma- provements for ASW projects. provided to encourage industry par- rine Navy to rapidly update the ship The Navy’s primary objective is to ticipation in the BYG-1 Tactical Con- safety tactical picture, integrates the acquire engineering services to sup- trol System (TCS) and Weapons common tactical picture into the bat- port development of advanced ASW Control Systems (WCS) develop- tlegroup, improves torpedo inter- technologies that can rapidly transi- ment, production, engineering and faces, and provides Tactical tion to fleet introduction via acquisi- technical services for SSN-688, SSN- TOMAHAWK(TOMAHAWK tion programs, and that significantly 688I, SSN-21, SSGN, SSBN, Vir- Block IV) capability. improve ASW capability while reduc- ginia, Collins and Future Class In February 2010, BYG-1 Ad- ing Total Ownership Costs. Some cur- submarines including other foreign vanced Processing Builds (APBs) are rent projects under development are navies. planned for Release-To-Fleet in discussed within these paragraphs to These competitive procurements 3QFY09, 3QFY11, 3QFY13, and provide examples of the kind of tech- are to provide engineering technical 3QFY15. nology services being sought. These services including materials and sup- BYG-1 APG/TI Upgrade Con- discussions are not intended to limit port for the development and imple- tracts the scope of future technologies and mentation of Technical Insertions and In July 2009, NAVSEA awarded services that are obtained under this Advanced Processing Build (APB) General Dynamics a $10.2 million solicitation. SOL is N00024-08-R- integration for the TCS/WCS under CPIF contract to fund engineering 5200, POC is Maya Edmondson, tel: the BYG-1. NAVSEA intends to re- services in support of the BYG-1, (202) 781-1948; email: maya.ed- lease the formal/final solicitation in funding 117,000 engineering service [email protected]. late July or early August 2008. The hours, to migrate the BYG-1 WCS Government intends to award sepa- Lockheed Martin Combat Sys- from technology insertion baseline rate Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF) tem for Brazil TI-08 to a TI-09, integrate advanced contracts, each with one (1) base year, In January 2008, NAVSEA issued processing build APB-09, and deliver four (4) option years, and five (5) Lockheed Martin a $35.3 million FFP this capability in multiple variants to possible award term periods for the contract to fund the adaptation, test- multiple submarine platforms. The development, systems engineering, ing, and logistics effort for the mod- work is to be conducted in numerous system integration, production, instal- ernization of the Brazilian Navy’s locations, with Fairfax, VA (53.6%); lation, logistics and support for the Tupi Class submarine’s Integrated Cape Canaveral, FL (17.6%); and TCS and WCS. SOL is N00024-08- Combat System (ICS). The work is to Roswell, GA (12.5%), primary in R-6294, POC is Eneida I Breaux, tel: cover the adapting, procuring, inte- terms of funding. The work is to be (202) 781-1341, or Peter E Rich- grating, testing, and conducting fac- completed in July 2010. Contract mond, tel: (202) 781-3920. tory acceptance of the ICS funding from Navy O&M and modernization effort, including sonar Biennial TI and APB Upgrades RDT&E (PE# 06045621N) (N00024- systems and flank arrays. The work is BYG-1 hardware upgrades (Tech- 09-C-6246). to be conducted in Manassas, VA nology Insertions [TIs]) are devel- In August 2009, NAVSEA issued (60%); Syracuse, NY (19%); Salt oped on a biennial basis to provide General Dynamics a $21.3 million Lake City, UT (15%); Oldsmar, FL improved capability and address CPIF contract for 228,000 man-hours (4%); and Baltimore, MD (2%), and COTS obsolescence. Funding also ac- of BYG-1 engineering services, to mi- is to be completed by June 2011. Con- commodates the biennial integration grate from baseline TI-08 to T-10, and tract funding is coming from FMS of software Advanced Processing integrate APB-09. The work is to be (N00024-08-C-6271). Builds (APBs) for both tactical con- conducted in Fairfax, VA (58.6%); trol (APB T) and weapon control Middleton, RI (26%); Fairfax Station, BYG-1 Support RFPs (APB W) subsystems. VA (4%); San Diego, CA (3.4%); In July 2008, NAVSEA, Washing- The tactical control integration ef- Hampton, VA (2.2%); McLean, VA ton Navy Yard, DC, issued a synopsis fort incorporates the integration of (1.8%); Shoreview, MN (1.3%); under a full and open competitive pro- other sensor (ESM, sonar, radar, etc.) Brigham City, UT (1%); Manassas, curement for engineering technical inputs to provide a common operation VA (1%); Greensboro, NC (0.5%); services and support of submarine tac- picture and improved situational Arlington, VA (0.1%); and Beaver- tical control system (TCS) (N00024- awareness in an information assur- ton, OR (0.1%), and is to be com- R-6295) and the weapons control ance (IA) compliant environment. pleted by July 2010. Contract funding system (WCS) (N00024-08-R-6294) The weapon control development is expected to come from PE# of the BYG-1 combat system. Com- effort provides improvements to the 0604503N (N00024-09-C-6250). ments must be sent to the PCO, Mr. weapons control subsystem based on Peter Richmond at e-mail: Peter.Rich-

SSBN/SSGN Fire Control Pro- ing Build (APB-15) software for de- tical Local Area Network (TacLAN); curement livery to multiple submarine plat- Information Assurance (IA); On- In November 2011, The Navy forms. board Team Trainer (OBTT); and Strategic Systems Programs Office Also in July 2015, the Navy Command, Control, Computer and (SSPO), Washington, DC, awarded awarded General Dynamics a $20 Intelligence Maintenance Tool General Dynamics’ Advanced Infor- million contract modification to con- (C3IMT). mation Systems, Pittsfield, MA, a $96 tinue modernizing the BYG-1 Weap- Proj. #VB034 Submarine Combat million CPIF, CPFF, FPI contract to ons Control System (WCS) TI and Control System Modernization Pro- purchase fire control systems for APB software for US Navy and Royal gram will procure hardware and soft- SSBN and SSGN submarines, specifi- Australian Navy submarines. ware upgrades for the BYG-1 system cally FY12 and FY13 funding for the for installation on all submarine plat- SSBN-726 to be Modernized to US and United Kingdom (UK) Tri- forms. The BYG-1 is the combat con- TI/APB dent II Strategic Weapons Systems trol system common across all In February 2015, the FY16 budget SSBN Fire Control Subsystem, SSGN submarine platforms which incorpo- announced Navy plans to modernize Attack Weapons Control Subsystem, rates tactical control, weapon control, SSBN-726 class submarines from the and US SSBN replacement and UK and Tactical Local Area Network CCS Mk2 Block 1C system to the SSBN successor common missile (TacLAN) functions into a single pro- TI/APB model. compartment engineering support. curement program. The BYG-1 al- The work will be conducted in Virginia Block III lows the submarine Navy to rapidly Pittsfield, MA, and is to be completed In February 2016, the Navy update the ship safety tactical picture, September 2012. The contract con- planned the first of the Block III Vir- integrates the common tactical pic- tains options, which if exercised, ginia class submarines to be entering ture into the battlegroup, improves would bring the contract value to service in FY16. Procurement fund- torpedo interfaces and provides tacti- $$225 million (completed in April ing provided for sustainment of the cal Tomahawk capability. 2016). Contract funding will come Common Weapon Launcher (CWL) BYG-1 systems will be continu- from Navy Weapons Procurement for Block III, as well as obsolescence ously updated with hardware en- (WPN) and Foreign Military Sales management for the Weapon Launch- hancements to address COTS (FMS) offices (N00030-12-C-0006). er Console Integrated Enclosure obsolescence and capability improve- (WLCIE) on Virginia Blocks I and II. ments as defined by the Advanced SSBN-726 Refurbs Processor Build (APB) process. Since FY06, SSBN-726 class sub- Continuing BYG-1 Upgrades These updates are referred to as Tech marines have been modernized with In February 2016, Navy procure- Insertion (TI) kits and are differenti- CCS MK2 BLOCK 1C systems re- ment funding in SSN Combat Control ated by year of development (i.e., moved from SSN-688 class subma- Systems, Proj. #VB011 Combat Sys- TI10, TI12, etc.). The TI upgrades rines. tems Technology Refresh/Legacy In- provide the baseline for all future tegration will procure tactical control SSN-688 Upgrades AN/BYG-1 procurements. In addi- hardware upgrades to SSN-688, SSN- In Aril 2013, funding was planned tion, this budget also provides tech 688I, SSBN, SSN-21, and SSGN for two SSN-688 class non-VLS to be insertion “kits” to update existing class submarines for legacy combat modernized in FY17 with TI-14 Tech BYG-1 platforms. The BYG-1 no- control systems. These updates pro- Insert Kits procured in FY15. Non- menclature was adopted in FY05 to vide accelerated delivery of tactical VLS platforms are not being upgraded incorporate the addition of the Vir- capability to the fleet and bridge the with configurations higher than TI- ginia class Combat Control System to gap between legacy combat control 14. a common acquisition and develop- systems and AN/BYG-1. It will pro- ment strategy. This allows for the Continuing BYG-1 Contract cure Engineering Changes (EC) and BYG-1 to be the common combat Mods Ordnance Alterations (ORDALT) to control system nomenclature across In July 2015, the Navy awarded correct fleet reported problems with all submarine platforms. Funds are for General Dynamics Advanced Infor- legacy Combat Control System soft- the installation of Combat Control mation Systems (AIS), Fairfax, VA, a ware and hardware. It will procure System equipment included in the $32.7 million modification to pre- Weapons Launch System, Multi-tube Fleet Modernization Program. viously awarded contract (N00024- Weapon Systems (MTWS) and pro- 09-C-6250) for BYG-1 Tactical vide support for fleet introduction of Submarine Combat System Im- Control Systems (TCS) Technology the Common Weapon Launcher provements Insertion (TI-14) Advanced Process- (CWL) transition and integration into In February 2018, in PE# the TI/APB process. It will provide 0603561N, Proj. #0223 Submarine system engineering in support of Tac- Combat System Improvement is com-

© Teal Group Corporation Military Electronics Briefing August 2019 AN/BYG-1(V) Combat Control System (CCS) Mk 2 Page 8 prised of three major efforts: Ad- various development efforts for the forts, requiring additional funding to vanced Processing Builds (APB), AN/BYG-1 CCS Mk 2. TheWeapons complete product delivery to plat- Flank Array Demonstration, and Ad- Control development effort is wind- forms. vanced Sensors. ing down with pending completion of FY18 will integrate additional The APB effort develops, tests and TI-16 APB15. The Payload Control Tactical Data Link (TDL) capabilities transitions capabilities for: System upgrade provides a modern- for Command & Control situational  APB Acoustics, transitioning to ized PCS open architecture to support awareness. FY18 also provides addi- AN/BQQ-10 A-RCI future payloads and integrate a com- tional R&D efforts for payload inte-  APB Tactical Control, transition- mon unmanned system controller. gration to support MK48, APB 5+, ing to AN/BYG-1 Combat Control Also funded are Advanced Weapons APB 6 efforts. System (CCS) Mk 2 Enhanced by Submarine Unmanned FY19 provides funding to com-  APB Imaging, transitioning to Aerial System Against Mobile Tar- mence development of APB 19 which AN/BVY-1 & BVS-1 Photonics gets (AWESUM), Joint Capability will add two new software baselines Masts Technical Demonstration (JCTD), in support of the VA Block IV Vir-  APB Electronic Warfare (EW), Experimental Fuel Cell (XFC), and ginia Pay Module (VPM) and the Co- transitioning to AN/BLQ-10 ES Unmanned Ariel System. lumbia class. Cyber security efforts System Funding provides for the develop- continue to grow due to increasing The Flank Array Demonstration ment of the Payloads Launch System, interconnection complexity, more IP develops signal processing, integrates Multi-tube Weapons System based traffic in future baselines, and improvements, and conducts testing (MTWS), Information Assurance development of Cyber Safe Controls. and analysis for large array configura- (IA) system, Onboard Team Trainer Common Infrastructure Services tions. Improvements are to be transi- (OBTT), and Command, Control, (CIS) development efforts begin un- tioned to PEO SUB for fielding on the Computer and Intelligence Mainte- der a new contract for APB 19 and Virginia class submarines. nance Tool (C3IMT). FY 18 adds de- continue on APB 17 under the current Advanced Sensors develops new velopment of a Common Tactical Control System contract. As technologies for Hull Mounted and Infrastructure Services (CIS) subsys- additional software applications are Towed Arrays. Hull Mounted im- tem, which involves integration of migrated to CIS additional funding of provements support submarine appli- Onboard Team Trainer - Master Con- this effort is required. Additional cations only. Towed array troller (OBTT - MC) & Command, funding for early integration efforts improvements are shared to also sup- Control, Computer and Intelligence for submarine payloads including port surface and surveillance applica- Maintenance Tool (C3IMT)/Inter- Contender, Maritime Strike Toma- tions. Subsystem Monitoring Tool (ISMT) hawk (MST), Next Generation Coun- efforts as well as other common serv- termeasure, and Anti-Torpedo CCS Mk 2 RDT&E Plans ices within SWFTS. CIS will be an Torpedo Compact Rapid Attack In February 2018, in the Navy independent subsystem with its own Weapons program (ATT CRAW) is FY19 budget, PE# 0604562N Subma- software development and testing ef- also included in FY19 funding. rine Tactical Warfare System funds

Current Developments CCS Mk 2 RDT&E Plans the Columbia class (CLB). Cyber se- Countermeasure, Anti-Torpedo Tor- In March 2019, in the Navy FY20 curity efforts continue to grow due to pedo Compact Rapid Attack Weap- budget, PE# 0604562N Submarine increasing interconnection complex- ons program (ATT CRAW) is also Tactical Warfare System funds vari- ity, more IP based traffic in future included in FY19 funding. ous development efforts for the baselines, and development of Cyber FY20 will continue FY19 efforts AN/BYG-1 CCS Mk 2. Safe Controls. Common Infrastruc- on APB 19 and commences TI-20 ef- FY19 continues integration of ture Services development efforts be- forts. Additional funding in FY20 will Tactical Data Link (TDL) capabilities gin under a new contract for APB 19 support growing efforts in Informa- for Command & Control situational and continue on APB 17 under the tion Assurance and CIS. The APB awareness, and additional R&D effort current Tactical Control System con- effort will grow to support two addi- for payload integration to support tract. As additional software applica- tional software baselines (VPM, MK48, APB 5+, APB 6 efforts. tions are migrated to CIS, additional CLB). FY19 provides funding to com- funding of this effort will be required. FY20 funding will integrate Sub- mence development of APB 19 which Additional funding for early integra- marine Launched Harpoon Block 1C will add two new software baselines tion efforts for submarine payloads into the Payload Control System. in support of the Virginia class Block including Contender, Maritime Strike Funds will transfer from PMA 201 to IV Virginia Pay Module (VPM) and Tomahawk (MST), Next Generation NAVSEA. Submarine Launched Har-

August 2019 Military Electronics Briefing © Teal Group Corporation Page 9 AN/BYG-1(V) Combat Control System (CCS) Mk 2 poon Platform Integration cost can’t carrying seven Tomahawk cruise mis- riority modifications on all SSNs and be executed by PMA 201 and will be siles or various other payloads. VPM VPM on seven SSNs with an option performed by NAVSEA. helps mitigate the loss of undersea to award a third SSN in FY20. strike capability with the retirement of The third FY20 SSN was added Block V Virginia Class Subs to the Navy’s four guided missile sub- during the PB2020 cycle without his- Add VPM: More Missile Tubes marines (SSGNs) in the mid-2020s. torical two-year and one-year Ad- The Block V Virginia SSNs will These changes to the baseline require vance Procurement (AP) or include significant enhancements. additional funding. Economic Order Quantity, and thus In March 2019, US Navy plans in will require three years to procure the FY20 budget stated all Block V Third Virginia Class Sub long lead time material (LLTM). As a and future SSNs will include modifi- Funded in FY20 result, the third FY20 SSN will begin cations similar to South Dakota Inser- In March 2019, the FY20 US Navy construction in FY23. tion Program (SDIP) efforts budget provided FY20 funds for three There is EOQ in FY18-21 and performed via RDT&E (PE# Virginia class submarines (two with FY17-22 AP funding for LLTM for 0604558N/Proj. #1947), which will the Virginia Payload Module [VPM]) 10 SSNs and detail design (no provide enhanced capability and im- incorporating Acoustic Superiority AP/EOQ included for the third FY20 proved performance. and AP/EOQ for future Block V SSN). The Virginia Payload Module SSNs. The FY20 increase in funding is (VPM) will be introduced on the sec- The Navy’s Virginia class procure- primarily driven by additional re- ond FY19, second and third FY20, ment program is currently negotiating quirements associated with the quan- and second FY21 hulls, and sub- the fourth MYP (Block V) contract tity increase from two to three SSNs. sequently fielded on all follow-on Vir- that will include 10 SSNs (FY19-23) Additionally, there is an increase to ginia class submarines. VPM is an and will incorporate acoustic supe- T&E requirements associated with 84-foot hull section with four addi- the increase from one VPM in FY19 tional payload tubes, each capable of to two VPM beginning in FY20. Teal Group Evaluation The AN/BYG-1(V) Combat Con- (Los Angeles class) and AN/BSY-2 more similar to the US’s CCS Mk 2). trol System (CCS) Mk 2 is a subma- (Seawolf) were each marvels of tech- This bad beginning affected the CCS rine weapons and tactical control nology at the time, but also suffered Mk 2’s reputation, even though the system, now installed on all subma- long delays and cost overages in de- diesel electric Collins subs have now rine classes in the US Navy, including velopment. The Navy now finally (be- already “sunk” US subs in exercises. the new Virginias, with more than 75 ginning only a few years later) has a CCS Mk 2 was bid for Spain’s systems in service. Essentially, all US genuinely common system, which diesel electric S-80A program, but Navy subs now share only two major should lead to major savings in the lost to Lockheed Martin, which devel- C4I/sonar systems – Raytheon’s CCS future. oped a system based on its A-RCI. Mk 2/BYG-1 and Lockheed Martin’s The CCS Mk 2’s chances for inter- Brazil also chose Lockheed Martin’s AN/BQQ-10(V) Acoustic-Rapid national sales were also good, but sub combat system in January 2008. COTS Insertion (A-RCI) sonar sys- have suffered from stiff competition. But even without additional for- tem. In September 2002, Australia decided eign sales, CCS Mk 2/BYG-1 will CCS Mk 2 has thus become a to acquire six CCS Mk 2-based com- remain a major US Navy program for hugely important and well-funded bat systems for its Collins class subs, decades, with substantial funding program, worth far more than unit cost under a $220 million project. At the continuing. In 2017, General Dynam- alone would indicate. Continuing bi- time, CCS Mk 2 was not yet proven, ics AIS stated more than 50% of ennial upgrades are planned, now that and there were major problems (the CCS/BYG-1 upgrade work was being US subs finally have a truly COTS Australian system was originally conducted by small businesses (Prog- combat system. In the 1980s and 90s, quite different from the US Navy sys- eny still has a substantial share in the billions of dollars were spent on intri- tem, and only after it basically didn’t March 2019 budget). cate but stove-piped combat systems work did the US Navy allow for individual classes. The AN/BSY-1 Raytheon to provide a system much

© Teal Group Corporation Military Electronics Briefing August 2019 AN/BYG-1(V) Combat Control System (CCS) Mk 2 Page 10 Funding Forecast RDT&E (FY19$ Millions) FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26 FY27 FY28 All RDT&E CCS Mk 2/BYG-1 62.0 64.0 66.0 68.0 70.0 70.0 74.0 76.0 74.0 72.0 Procurement (FY19$ Millions) FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26 FY27 FY28 All Production and Upgrade & Support CCS Mk 2/BYG-1 180.0 190.0 240.0 190.0 200.0 220.0 200.0 240.0 190.0 210.0

August 2019