DOCSLIB.ORG

Response to Comment by Faurby, Werdelin and Svenning Stephen J

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Response to Comment by Faurby, Werdelin and Svenning Stephen J O’Brien et al. Genome Biology (2016) 17:90 DOI 10.1186/s13059-016-0942-z CORRESPONDENCE Open Access Response to Comment by Faurby, Werdelin and Svenning Stephen J. O’Brien1,2*, Klaus Peter Koepfli1,3, Eduardo Eizirik4, Warren Johnson3, Carlos Driscoll5, Agostinho Antunes6, Anne Schmidt-Kuntzel7,8, Laurie Marker8 and Pavel Dobrynin1 Please see related Correspondence article: http://genomebiology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13059-016-0943-y and related Research article: http://genomebiology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13059-015-0837-4 Faurby, Werdelin, and Svenning raise some interesting during the late Pleistocene by multiple molecular and valid points around the interpretation of the genomics methods, coincident with abrupt mammal extinction and fossil data on the history of the African cheetah, a events in North America and Eurasia at that time. The species that has fascinated humankind for millennia. They genome-wide Dadi result suggested an earlier more emphasize a controversy to which we alluded in our art- ancient demographic contraction ~100,000 years ago. icle [1] and they offer an alternative explanation to the Something caused the massive diversity loss in their scenario we had suggested for the time and place of history. We suggested two scenarios: the earliest—a demographic events that preceded modern African migration of North American cheetahs out of North cheetah populations. We fully agree that there are import- America >100,000 years BP, and a second—when ant areas of uncertainty in this conundrum and welcome cheetahs went extinct from North America the opportunity to reconsider and to offer our view into 10,000–12,000 years ago. It may be relevant that the natural history of Acinonyx jubatus. We do believe North American pumas show a near identical that the integration of fossil and molecular data seems a quantity of genomic depletion as African cheetahs, good way to get toward the truth, so we shall try to suggesting they were also extirpated form North emphasize two considerations in our comments: first, the America during the quaternary mammal extinction most parsimonious interpretation of data; and second, the and repopulated from South America subsequently robustness of available and relevant fossil and molecular [3–5]. Was this an irrelevant coincidence or was a data. single North American or global event responsible? Some aspects to consider: Theanswerisuncertain. 2. Please refer to [6, 7] which detail the latest relatively 1. The extreme genetic depletion of modern cheetahs robust molecular phylogenies for the Felidae and a seems true and validated by Dobrynin et al., as has derivative study [8] that postulates parsimonious been suggested with multiple metrics across several historic migration scenarios based upon phylogeny, decades [1–3]. Two possible historic events that the fossil record, present and past geographical could account for the genetic reduction are extended occurrence, and geological sea levels. That phylogenetic continental migration events and/or population study reported in [6] examined 18,853 bp of bottlenecks (a.k.a. founder effect). We offered nuclear sequence (autosome, X and Y possible (but not proven) explanations based upon chromosome), which yielded 3440 parsimony dating the latest founder effect at 10,000–12,000 informative sites, and mtDNA sequence, from all 37 Felidae species calibrated with 16 fossil dates [6]. * Correspondence: [email protected] That molecular phylogeny (combined with 1Theodosius Dobzhansky Center for Genome Bioinformatics, Saint Petersburg paleontological, geological and present range) State University, 41A Sredniy Avenue, St. Petersburg 199004, Russia 2Oceanographic Center, Nova Southeastern University Ft Lauderdale, 8000 N. posited the arrival of the ancestors of three Felidae Ocean Drive, Ft Lauderdale, FL 33004, USA Full list of author information is available at the end of the article © 2016 O’Brien et al. Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. O’Brien et al. Genome Biology (2016) 17:90 Page 2 of 3 lineages (Ocelot preceding Lynx, and then preceding Valkenburgh et al. [9] attribute to homoplasy or Puma lineage) into North America, around 8–8.5 parallelisms. But at least three respected authors million years ago (MYA). All three lineages have groups have disagreed [10–12] and opined that the roots in North America with ocelot ancestors adaptive similarities are evidence for homology of appearing first 8.0 MYA, Lynx ancestors 7.2 MYA, North American and African cheetahs supporting and Puma ancestors 6.7 MYA. Cheetah-like genera the modern cheetah origins in North America. (Acinonyx lineage) appear first ~4.9 MYA. Support Adams’ study titled “The cheetah-native American” for this scenario comes from molecular evolutionary [10], classifies the North American cheetah specimens analyses that were supported by 13 cladistic as Acinonyx (precursors of modern Acinonyx)and synapomorphies (large insertion/deletions) [6]. suggests that pronouncing these important cursorial Sometime thereafter, the Acinonyx lineage ancestors, characters as convergence or parallelism “pushes the derived from the North American puma lineage concept of parallel evolution to an unprecedented precursors, would make their way back to Asia from extreme”. Van Valkenburgh et al. [9] actually place North America. The fossil record puts the oldest the Eurasian Acinonyx and the North American cheetah fossils in Asia 3 million years before present Miracinonyx genera as sister taxa, emphasizing the (MYBP). Fossils of Acinonyx and cheetah-looking difficulty in sorting this controversy cleanly. Further cats were in both in Asia and North America from 3 they state “… The common ancestor (of Acinonyx MYA to the late Pleistocene. So the comment in and Miracinonyx) … could have been either Old or their title “There were never any true cheetahs in New World.” North America” depends on what we mean by “true Mark Springer, a noted expert of interpreting cheetahs.” molecular and paleontological evidence across 3. Faurby, Werdelin, and Svenning argue cogently that vertebrate taxa [13], states that “… morphological North American cheetah fossils are all from the studies of eutherian … relationships have failed to genus Miracinonyx, which is not closely related to separate homology and homoplasy and have modern Acinonyx cheetahs, which occur in Africa consistently been misled by the latter … one of the today and in Eurasia throughout the Pliocene and greatest challenges ahead for mammalian Pleistocene fossil deposits. Thus, the trivial name of systematists is to tease apart homology and North American “cheetah” is misleading (they imply homoplasy in morphological characters.” Springer’s we fell into that trap, although these authors study described explicitly how morphological inference themselves use the trivial name “cheetah” ten times erred in over 50 % of ordinal assignments within the in their note). The data supporting the distinctions mammalian radiations due to this issue [13]. of North American species in Miracinonyx from 4. Faurby, Werdelin, and Svenning refer to Barnet et al. Eurasian Acinonyx are the bases of the controversy. [14] who presented a molecular phylogeny that uses A seminal and elegant report by Van Valkenburgh et ancient DNA to place the North American al. [9] concluded that North American cheetah Miracinonyx as a sister to Puma concolor (and not fossils (there were six specimens, one complete and modern Acinonyx), but they acknowledge the limited five fragmented) were cladistically similar based power of a 1302 bp mtDNA dataset. There are other upon ten synapomorphic morphological features details of the Barnett study that may be relevant. that were distinct from Eurasian Acinonyx fossils. First, the actual nucleotide alignment is not This study proposed the distinction of North presented which limits our ability to evaluate their America (Miracinonyx) and Eurasian (Acinonyx) conclusions or assess the extent of homoplasy. genera in 1990. Faurby, Werdelin, and Svenning Further, when Barnet et al. performed a jack-knife affirm this conclusion by stating “… No fossils of analyses, excluding H. jaguarundi from the Acinonyx are known from North America, despite the phylogenic analysis (H. jaguarundi is a sister taxon extensive fossil record from the continent, while no to Puma concolor [6–8]), statistical support for the fossils of Miracinonyx are known outside North sister relationship of Puma-Miracinonyx actually America.” increased, an indication that molecular homoplasy This declarative statement discounts a longstanding was operative in their results [14]. Their conclusion controversy that Van Valkenburgh et al. [9] that American cheetah Miracinonyx is not within acknowledge. First, there are several important the African-Asian Acinonyx group is tentative at best adaptive morphometric characters that are shared and has not been confirmed convincingly. between North America and Eurasian cheetah 5. Faurby, Werdelin, and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • MOLECULAR GENETIC IDENTIFICATION of a MEXICAN ONZA SPECIMEN AS a PUMA (PUMA CONCOLOR) in the Americas, There Are Two Documented
    Cryptozoology, 12, 1993-1996, 42-49 © 1996 International Society of Cryptozoology MOLECULAR GENETIC IDENTIFICATION OF A MEXICAN ONZA SPECIMEN AS A PUMA (PUMA CONCOLOR) PE tit A. DRATCH Laboratory of Viral Carcinogenesis, National Cancer Institute, Frederick Cancer Research and Development Center, Building 560/Room 21-105, Frederick, Maryland 21702, U.S.A. and National Fish and Wildlife Forensics Laboratory Ashland, Oregon 96520, U.S.A. WENDY RosLuND National Fish and Wildlife Forensics Laboratory Ashland, Oregon 96520, U.S.A. JANICE S. MARTENSON, MELANIE CULVER, AND STEPHEN J. O'BRIEN' Laboratory of Viral Carcinogenesis, National Cancer Institute, Frederick Cancer Research and Development Center, Building 560/Room 21-105, Frederick, Maryland 21702, U.S.A. ABSTRACT: Tissue samples from an alleged Mexican Onza, shot in the western Sierra Madre in 1986, were subjected to several biochemical assays in an attempt to determine the specimen's relationship to felid species of North America. Protein analyses included isoenzyme electrophoresis and albumin isoelectric focusing. Mi- tochondrial DNA was assayed for restriction fragment lengths with 28 restriction enzymes, and the NÐ5 gene was sequenced. The resulting protein and rnitochondrial DNA characteristics of the Onza were indistinguishable from those of North Amer- ican pumas. INTRODUCTION In the Americas, there are two documented species of large cats: 1) Puma concolor, the puma, also called mountain lion, cougar, and panther in dif- ferent regions of North America, and known as leon in Mexico; and 2) Panthera onca, the jaguar, or tigre as it is known south of the U.S. border. To whom correspondence should be addressed. 42 DRATCH ET AL.: ONZA MOLECULAR GENETIC IDENTIFICATION 43 Flo.
    [Show full text]
  • Mammalia: Carnivora) in the Americas: Past to Present
    Journal of Mammalian Evolution https://doi.org/10.1007/s10914-020-09496-8 ORIGINAL PAPER Environmental Drivers and Distribution Patterns of Carnivoran Assemblages (Mammalia: Carnivora) in the Americas: Past to Present Andrés Arias-Alzate1,2 & José F. González-Maya3 & Joaquín Arroyo-Cabrales4 & Rodrigo A. Medellín5 & Enrique Martínez-Meyer2 # Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020 Abstract Understanding species distributions and the variation of assemblage structure in time and space are fundamental goals of biogeography and ecology. Here, we use an ecological niche modeling and macroecological approach in order to assess whether constraints patterns in carnivoran richness and composition structures in replicated assemblages through time and space should reflect environmental filtering through ecological niche constraints from the Last Inter-glacial (LIG), Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) to the present (C) time. Our results suggest a diverse distribution of carnivoran co-occurrence patterns at the continental scale as a result of spatial climatic variation as an important driver constrained by the ecological niches of the species. This influence was an important factor restructuring assemblages (more directly on richness than composition patterns) not only at the continental level, but also from regional and local scales and this influence was geographically different throughout the space in the continent. These climatic restrictions and disruption of the niche during the environmental changes at the LIG-LGM-C transition show a considerable shift in assemblage richness and composition across the Americas, which suggests an environ- mental filtering mainly during the LGM, explaining between 30 and 75% of these variations through space and time, with more accentuated changes in North than South America.
    [Show full text]
  • Cougar 1 Cougar
    Cougar 1 Cougar Cougar[1] Temporal range: Middle Pleistocene to recent Conservation status [2] Least Concern (IUCN 3.1) Scientific classification Kingdom: Animalia Phylum: Chordata Class: Mammalia Order: Carnivora Family: Felidae Genus: Puma Species: Puma concolor Binomial name Puma concolor (Linnaeus, 1771) Cougar 2 Cougar range The cougar (Puma concolor), also known as puma, mountain lion, mountain cat, catamount or panther, depending on the region, is a mammal of the family Felidae, native to the Americas. This large, solitary cat has the greatest range of any large wild terrestrial mammal in the Western Hemisphere,[3] extending from Yukon in Canada to the southern Andes of South America. An adaptable, generalist species, the cougar is found in every major American habitat type. It is the second heaviest cat in the Western Hemisphere, after the jaguar. Although large, the cougar is most closely related to smaller felines and is closer genetically to the domestic cat than to true lions. A capable stalk-and-ambush predator, the cougar pursues a wide variety of prey. Primary food sources include ungulates such as deer, elk, moose, and bighorn sheep, as well as domestic cattle, horses and sheep, particularly in the northern part of its range. It will also hunt species as small as insects and rodents. This cat prefers habitats with dense underbrush and rocky areas for stalking, but it can also live in open areas. The cougar is territorial and persists at low population densities. Individual territory sizes depend on terrain, vegetation, and abundance of prey. While it is a large predator, it is not always the dominant species in its range, as when it competes for prey with other predators such as the jaguar, grey wolf, American Black Bear, and the grizzly bear.
    [Show full text]
  • LOCOMOTOR ADAPTATIONS and ECOMORPHOLOGY of SHORT-FACED BEARS (Arctodus Simus) in EASTERN BERINGIA
    Palaeontology Program Government of the Yukon Occasional Papers in Earth Sciences No. 7 LOCOMOTOR ADAPTATIONS AND ECOMORPHOLOGY OF SHORT-FACED BEARS (Arctodus simus) IN EASTERN BERINGIA Paul E. Matheus The Alaska Quaternary Center, Department of Geology and Geophysics and The Institute of Arctic Biology University of Alaska Fairbanks YUKON Palaeontology Program Department of Tourism and Culture Elaine Taylor, Minister 2003 Publication Note: This monograph was originally written as as Matheus 1995 and 2001. The dissertation also Chapters 2, 3, and 4 of the Ph.D. dissertation contained an appendix with stable isotope data on entitled, “Paleoecology and Ecomorphology of the modern and Pleistocene carnivores along with a Giant Short-Faced Bear in Eastern Beringia,” manual for extracting and purifying collagen from completed by the author in 1997 at The University bone. The present monograph may be cited of Alaska Fairbanks. The content is essentially directly, but if the citation is used to establish unchanged, except for minor editing, typographic when the ideas herein were established or data corrections, and re-formatting. The complete herein made public, then the dissertation or dissertation contained two additional papers Matheus (1995) take precedence. (Chapters 1 and 5) that are cited in this monograph YUKON Palaeontology Program Department of Tourism and Culture Elaine Taylor, Minister 2003 LOCOMOTOR ADAPTATIONS AND ECOMORPHOLOGY OF SHORT-FACED BEARS (Arctodus simus) IN EASTERN BERINGIA Paul E. Matheus TABLE OF CONTENTS Frontispiece
    [Show full text]
  • Incorporating a Deeper Temporal Perspective Into Modern Ecology Felisa A
    opinion and perspectives ISSN 1948-6596 perspective Losing time? Incorporating a deeper temporal perspective into modern ecology Felisa A. Smith1 and Alison G. Boyer2 1Department of Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA. [email protected]; http://biology.unm.edu/fasmith/ 2Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA. [email protected]; http://eeb.bio.utk.edu/boyer/index.html Abstract. Ecologists readily acknowledge that a temporal perspective is essential for untangling ecological complexity, yet most studies remain of relatively short duration. Despite a number of excellent essays on the topic, only recently have ecologists begun to explicitly incorporate a historical component. Here we provide several concrete examples drawn largely from our own work that clearly illustrate how the adoption of a longer temporal perspective produces results significantly at odds with those obtained when relying solely on modern data. We focus on projects in the areas of conservation, global change and macroecology because such work often relies on broad-scale or synthetic data that may be heavily influenced by historic or prehistoric anthropogenic factors. Our analysis suggests that considerable care should be taken when extrapolating from studies of extant systems. Few, if any, modern systems have been unaffected by anthropogenic influences. We encourage the further integration between paleoecologists and ecologists, who have been historically segregated into different departments, scientific societies and scientific cultures. Keywords: climate change, conservation, macroecology, paleoecology, palaeoecology, woodrat The pronghorn (Antilocapra americana) is a nature of animals like the pronghorn, but more as quintessential symbol of the Great Plains.
    [Show full text]
  • Kob Coloring Book2
    Coloring Book Illustrations by Rachel Catalano King of Beasts is generously presented by Susan Naylor. Coloring Book Illustrations by Rachel Catalano King of Beasts is generously presented by Susan Naylor. OCELOT BOBCAT DOMESTIC CAT MOUNTAIN LION AFRICAN LION JAGUAR AMERICAN CHEETAH HOMOTHERIUM SMILODON AMERICAN LION illion Years go illion Years go illion Years go illion Years go illion illion Years go Years go illion illion Years go Years go illion Years go Eleven thousand years ago there were as many as nine different species of wild cats living in what is now Texas. WILD CATS: A FAMILY TREE These cats and African lions evolved millions of years ago Follo the branches of this evolutionary tree to see ho the frican lion from a common ancestor. is related to ild cats of easpast and present. The scimitar-toothed cat, Homotherium, lived in Texas around 20,000 years The well-known saber-toothed cat, Smilodon, would have been a rare sight in Texas ago. These cats weighed around 300 pounds but could easily run and pounce about 13,000 years ago. These large cats could open their jaws nearly twice as on their prey. This includes large juvenile woolly mammoths. In fact, scientists wide as any modern cat. They used their long, jagged canine teeth to take large, have discovered rare fossils of scimitar-toothed cats as well deadly bites out of their prey, which included as more than 300 teeth from juvenile camels and bison. Both Smilodon mammoths in Freisenhahn Cave, and Homotherium branched Bexar County. off from other cats on the evolutionary tree about 18 million years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Where Elephants Roam? American High Plains Preserve Would Protect Species
    WHERE ELEPHANTS ROAM? AMERICAN HIGH PLAINS PRESERVE WOULD PROTECT SPECIES: Have you ever wanted to go on safari, but never found the time or money for an African trip? Well, if a determined bunch of field ecologists have their way, large tracts of the semi-arid southern High Plains and Intermountain West in the United States would be fenced in and populated with elephants, lions, cheetahs and wild horses. I think this is a capital idea. These creatures, including camels and sabertoothed tigers (Smilodon), were widespread in America during the Pleistocene epoch, commonly known as the last great ice age. They disappeared during a mass extinction that took place after the arrival of ice age hunters about 13,000 years ago. Though the jury is still out on whether humans actually caused the mass extinction, one thing is clear. The same mega-fauna survived, roughly intact, through all of the climatic and environmental disruptions of the previous million years before humans arrived. The ecological goal of introducing these animals is not to turn North America into Africa. The goal is to replace creatures missing from the impoverished mammalian ecosystem of the modern-day New World with their closest surrogates from the modern-day Old World. Bringing big game back to America is not a new idea. Menageries of exotic animals already thrive on ranches throughout Texas and nearby states. Drive-through game parks have become popular tourist attractions, especially San Diego's Wild Animal Park, which gets 1.5 million visitors a year. Humans flock there because practically everyone from toddlers to centenarians experiences a positive emotional response when sighting large animals in the wild (or, failing that, the semi-wild).
    [Show full text]
  • Donlan CJ. 2007. Restoring America's Big Wild Animals
    Donlan CJ. 2007. Restoring America's big wild animals. Scientific American June 2007:72-7. Keywords: 1NAm/cheetah/cougar/jaguar/lion/megafauna/Miracinonyx trumani/Panthera leo/Panthera onca/Pleistocene/Puma concolor/saber-toothed cat Abstract: Pleistocene rewilding-a proposal to bring back animals that disappeared from North America 13,000 years ago-offers an optimistic agenda for 21st-century conservation. In the fall of 2004 a dozen conservation biologists gathered on a ranch in New Mexico to ponder a bold plan. The scientists, trained in a variety of disciplines, ranged from the grand old men of the fi eld to those of us earlier in our careers. The idea we were mulling over was the reintroduction of large vertebrates-megafauna-to North America. Most of these animals, such as mammoths and cheetahs, died out roughly 13,000 years ago, when humans from Eurasia began migrating to the continent. The theory-propounded 40 years ago by Paul Martin of the University of Arizona- is that overhunting by the new arrivals reduced the numbers of large vertebrates so severely that the populations could not recover. Called Pleistocene overkill, the concept was highly controversial at the time, but the general thesis that humans played a significant role is now widely accepted. Martin was present at the meeting in New Mexico, and his ideas on the loss of these animals, the ecological consequences, and what we should do about it formed the foundation of the proposal that emerged, which we dubbed Pleistocene rewilding. Restoring America’s n the fall of 2004 a dozen conservation biologists gath- Although the cheetahs, lions and mammoths that once ered on a ranch in New Mexico to ponder a bold plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Have You Seen a Pronghorn in Idaho? If
    Pronghorn ave you seen a pronghorn in Idaho? If you Pronghorns are the fastest animals in North Hdid, you were most likely not in the northern America. They can run 45 miles-per-hour over part of our state. Pronghorns are animals that a long period of time! That doesn’t mean they like wide open spaces. don’t have predators though. Coyotes eat more pronghorns than any other animal. Bobcats They are usually found on grasslands and are also predators that might catch a young shrubby areas where the plants don’t get pronghorn. much over two feet high. Pronghorns love the sagebrush in southern Idaho. This is their main Catching a healthy adult pronghorn is no easy source of food in the winter. In the summer, feat. They have excellent hearing and a good they will also eat soft stemmed plants, like sense of smell. But their eyesight is amazing! A wildflowers. They don’t like to eat much grass. pronghorn’s eyeball is about one and one-half inches in diameter. That’s the size of a horse’s You may also hear people call pronghorn eye! Pronghorns can see something moving antelope. Pronghorns may look like the antelope when it is up to four miles away! You might that roam the African plains, but they are really say they have built-in binoculars. Although very different animals. Pronghorns are in the pronghorns can detect a moving object miles family Antilocapridae (an-til-o-CAP-ri-day). They away, they may ignore a person standing still just are the only member of this family.
    [Show full text]
  • Asiatic Cheetah
    Cheetah 1 Cheetah Cheetah[1] Temporal range: Late Pliocene to Recent Conservation status [2] Vulnerable (IUCN 3.1) Scientific classification Kingdom: Animalia Phylum: Chordata Class: Mammalia Order: Carnivora Family: Felidae Genus: Acinonyx Species: A. jubatus Binomial name Acinonyx jubatus (Schreber, 1775) Type species Acinonyx venator Brookes, 1828 (= Felis jubata, Schreber, 1775) by monotypy Subspecies See text. Cheetah 2 The range of the cheetah The cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus) is a large-sized feline (family Felidae) inhabiting most of Africa and parts of the Middle East. The cheetah is the only extant member of the genus Acinonyx, most notable for modifications in the species' paws. As such, it is the only felid with non-retractable claws and pads that, by their scope, disallow gripping (therefore cheetahs cannot climb vertical trees, although they are generally capable of reaching easily accessible branches). The cheetah, however, achieves by far the fastest land speed of any living animal—between 112 and 120 km/h (70 and 75 mph)[3] [4] in short bursts covering distances up to 500 m (1600 ft), and has the ability to accelerate from 0 to over 100 km/h (62 mph) in three seconds.[5] Etymology The word "cheetah" is derived from the Sanskrit word citrakāyaḥ, meaning "variegated", via the Hindi चीता cītā.[6] Genetics and classification The genus name, Acinonyx, means "no-move-claw" in Greek, while the species name, jubatus, means "maned" in Latin, a reference to the mane found in cheetah cubs. The cheetah has unusually low genetic variability. This is accompanied by a very low sperm count, motility, and deformed flagella.[7] Skin grafts between unrelated cheetahs illustrate the former point in that there is no rejection of the donor skin.
    [Show full text]
  • Encyclopedia of Extinct Animals.Pdf
    EXTINCT ANIMALS This page intentionally left blank EXTINCT ANIMALS An Encyclopedia of Species That Have Disappeared during Human History Ross Piper Illustrations by Renata Cunha and Phil Miller GREENWOOD PRESS Westport, Connecticut • London Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Piper, Ross. Extinct animals : an encyclopedia of species that have disappeared during human history / Ross Piper ; illustrations by Renata Cunha and Phil Miller. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978–0–313–34987–4 (alk. paper) 1. Extinct animals—Encyclopedias. I. Title. QL83.P57 2009 591.6803—dc22 2008050409 British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data is available. Copyright © 2009 by Ross Piper All rights reserved. No portion of this book may be reproduced, by any process or technique, without the express written consent of the publisher. Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 2008050409 ISBN: 978–0–313–34987–4 First published in 2009 Greenwood Press, 88 Post Road West, Westport, CT 06881 An imprint of Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc. www.greenwood.com Printed in the United States of America Th e paper used in this book complies with the Permanent Paper Standard issued by the National Information Standards Organization (Z39.48–1984). 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 We live in a zoologically impoverished world, from which all the hugest, and fi ercest, and strangest forms have recently disappeared. —Alfred Russel Wallace (1876) This page intentionally left blank To my Mum, Gloria This page intentionally left blank CONTENTS Preface
    [Show full text]
  • Bryce Canyon U.S
    National Park Service Bryce Canyon U.S. Department of the Interior Bryce Canyon National Park Pronghorn (Antilocapra americana) Their scientific name, Antilocapra americana, means “American Antelope Goat,” but they are not closely related to the antelopes of Africa and Asia. They are the fastest land animals in the western hemisphere, and they are a link to the past as one of the few remaining survivors of the last Ice Age. Pronghorns evolved when the hemisphere was home to the American Cheetah as well as other large predators and, in order to survive, they had to be fast. Vital Statistics Named for the forward facing prong on the buck’s horns, they are often referred to as antelope or Pronghorn Antelope, however, the correct common name is simply Pronghorn. Their horns are unique in the animal kingdom and shared by no living other species. Antlers are bone and shed each year, while bovine horns are permanent and are bone covered with a keratin sheath (hair and nails are keratin). The Pronghorn is similar to the bovine family in that they have bone covered with a keratin sheath, but Always on the alert, a Pronghorn Doe. with one major exception: the keratin sheath The males average 3 ft. (0.9 m) tall, is shed each year after the breeding season, 60 in.(1.5 m) in length, and weigh the regrows each Spring. 120 pounds (55 kg). The females are approximately 10% smaller. Not large animals, Pronghorn have eyes as large as a horse, are able to detect movement up to 4 miles/6.5 km away, and have a field of view of more than 300 degrees.
    [Show full text]