The Moodiness of Action*
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Anarcho-Capitalist Threads in Modern Libertarianism: the Social Thought of Murray Rothbard
University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 12-1990 Anarcho-Capitalist Threads in Modern Libertarianism: The Social Thought of Murray Rothbard Larry M. Hall University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Hall, Larry M., "Anarcho-Capitalist Threads in Modern Libertarianism: The Social Thought of Murray Rothbard. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 1990. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/2792 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Larry M. Hall entitled "Anarcho-Capitalist Threads in Modern Libertarianism: The Social Thought of Murray Rothbard." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in Political Science. T. Alexander Smith, Major Professor We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance: Thomas Ungs, Robert Gorman, Hans Jensen Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Larry M. Hall entitled "Anarcho-Capitalist Threads in Modern Libertarianism: The Social Thought of Murray Rothbard." I have examined the final copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted for partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in Political Science. -
Anarchism-Today-Randall-Amster.Pdf
ANARCHISM TODAY ANARCHISM TODAY RANDALL AMSTER Foreword by John Clark 0 PRAEGER AN IMPRINT OF ABC-CLIO, llC Santa Barbara, California • Denver, Colorado • Oxford, England Copyright 2012 by Randall Amster All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, except for the inclusion of brief quotations in a review, without prior permission in writing from the publisher. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Amster, Randall. Anarchism today I Randall Amster ; foreword by john Clark. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-313-39872-8 (cloth: alk. paper)- ISBN 978-0-313-39873-5 (ebook) 1. Anarchism. I. Title. HX833.A47 2012 335'.83-dc23 2011046778 ISBN: 978-0-313-39872-8 EISBN: 978-0-313-39873-5 16 15 14 13 12 1 2 3 4 5 This book is also available on the World Wide Web as an eBook. Visit www.abc-clio.com for details. Praeger An Imprint of ABC-CLIO, LLC ABC-CLIO, LLC 130 Cremona Drive, P.O. Box 1911 Santa Barbara, California 93116-1911 This book is printed on acid-free paper oo: Manufactured in the United States of America For Arlo, a shining star, and Zeno, a natural-born anarchist ... Contents Foreword by John Clark IX Preface X Ill Acknowledgments xvn Introduction: The Resurgence of Anarchism XIX 1 Contemporary Anarchist Thought 1 2 Anarchism in Action 23 3 The Violence Question 43 4 Anarchist Ecologies 63 5 "Do It Yourself"-Together 87 6 From the Local to the Global 119 7 Assessing Anarchism's Impact 145 Conclusion: Anarchism as Future Vision 165 Notes 177 Bibliography 207 Index 225 Foreword he best political works are those that are rooted most deeply in the truths of experience, maintaining their connection with the demands ofT the real lives of people and communities. -
Free Will, Determinism and the “Problem” of Structure and Agency in the Social Sciences
ORE Open Research Exeter TITLE Free will, determinism and the “problem” of structure and agency in the social sciences AUTHORS Pleasants, NJ JOURNAL Philosophy of the Social Sciences DEPOSITED IN ORE 29 October 2018 This version available at http://hdl.handle.net/10871/34537 COPYRIGHT AND REUSE Open Research Exeter makes this work available in accordance with publisher policies. A NOTE ON VERSIONS The version presented here may differ from the published version. If citing, you are advised to consult the published version for pagination, volume/issue and date of publication Free will, determinism and the “problem” of structure and agency in the social sciences Sociology does not need to choose between the great hypotheses which divide metaphysicians. It needs to embrace free will no more than determinism. All that it asks is that the principle of causality be applied to social phenomena (Durkheim 1966, 141). Causality...is not a cab, which one can have stopped at one’s pleasure; it is all or nothing (Weber 1970, 119) 1. Structure and Agency The so-called “problem” of structure and agency has been dubbed “the central problem in social and political theory” (Carlsnaes 1992, 245). Charged with the task of explaining and understanding human behaviour, the social sciences are faced with the apparent dichotomy between individuals’ free agency and the social- structural causation that bears upon them. Certain types of social inquiry are conventionally seen to be orientated more to one side of this dichotomy than the other. Classical social science of the Marxian and Durkheimian varieties proffer explanatory analyses in which individuals’ beliefs, desires, opportunities, and actions appear to be constrained or determined by causes emanating from the social system in which they are embedded. -
Toward an Analytic Sociology: Reconciling Structural and Individualistic Explanations of Social Phenomena Via a Theory of Embodied Practice
Toward an Analytic Sociology: Reconciling Structural and Individualistic Explanations of Social Phenomena via a Theory of Embodied Practice By Michael Polyakov A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Mark Bevir, Chair Professor Christopher Ansell Associate Professor Kinch Hoekstra Professor Neil Fligstein Fall 2014 Abstract Toward an Analytic Sociology: Reconciling Structural and Individualistic Explanations of Social Phenomena via a Theory of Embodied Practice by Michael Polyakov Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science University of California, Berkeley Professor Mark Bevir, Chair Social theory explanations commonly take one of two forms. Accounts couched in terms of macroscopic entities such as institutions, culture, class, structure and tradition tend to privilege stability and regularity. Individualistic explanations, on the other hand, take these entities to be ultimately reducible to free actions of individuals and are most adept at explaining transformation and volatility in the social realm. These two forms of explanation are rooted in radically different ontological and normative assumptions, and no attempt to connect them has garnered wide acceptance to date. This dissertation once re-examines the tension between them, which has become known as the “structure vs. agency” debate, by drawing on and extending the insights of “theories of practice”, a literature that locates the junction of structure and agency in the routines of ordinary daily activities. The dissertation begins by critically examining two extant theories of practice. One originates in Pierre Bourdieu, Anthony Giddens, and William Sewell’s responses to structuralism; the other is articulated by Theodore Schatzki, who draws on Ludwig Wittgenstein to characterize practice as a semantic lens through which social actors make sense of the world. -
A Critique of Co-Deterministic Theories of Structure and Agency*
Relational Thinking: A Critique of Co-Deterministic Theories of Structure and Agency* FRANC¸OIS DEPELTEAU´ Laurentian University This article presents a relational criticism of the “morphogenetic theory” of M. Archer. This theory is founded and representative of the most influential mode of perception of the social universe of the last few decades: co-determinism (structure ↔ agency). Co-determinism’s influence can be explained by its integration of modern general presuppositions like freedom, individualism, and the quest for a new social order. By identifying five basic principles of relational sociology, we see that Archer’s co-deterministic theory offers a complicated solution to avoid voluntarism and co- determinism, limits the potential of sociological imagination, cannot adequately see the fluidity of social processes, produces a certain reification of social structures and agency, and is based on an inconsistent use of egocentric and relational perspectives. These problems can be avoided if we use a relational approach (actor ↔ actor ⇒ structures) based on the study of complex and empirical trans-actions. Sociology has been strongly influenced by two modes of perception of the social uni- verse over the last two or three decades: co-determinism and relationism. The most influential is co-determinism. In contemporary sociology, this refers to the works of well-known social scientists such as M. Archer (1982, 1995, 2000a, 2000b, 2003), R. Bhaskar(1998), P. BergerandT. Luckmann (1967), P. Bourdieu(1977, 1984, 1990a, 1990b), A. Giddens (1979, 1984, 1986, 1990, 1993), C.W. Mills [1959] 2000, and N. Mouzelis (1989, 1993, 1995, 2000). In the first part of this article, we will discuss that in one way oranother,co-determinismexplains social phenomena as the effects of inter-actions between agency and social structures. -
The Subversive Kernel : Anarchism and the Politics of Jesus In
THE SUBVERSIVE KERNEL: ANARCHISM AND THE POLITICS OF JESUS IN POSTSECULAR THEOLOGY By Theodore P. Troxell A DISSERTATION Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILSOPHY American Studies 2012 ABSTRACT THE SUBVERSIVE KERNEL: ANARCHISM AND THE POLITICS OF JESUS IN POSTSECULAR THEOLOGY By Theodore P. Troxell The relationship between religion and politics has been a tenuous one in Western culture. Related to this tension is the growing interest in what we might call the “postsecular.” Postsecularity describes the sense in which what we think of as the secular is not something left over when religion is abolished but rather a way of thinking that was constructed in response to and on the heels of developments in Christian theology. This dissertation examines the work of John Howard Yoder, Stanley Hauerwas, and John Milbank, three theologians whose work is not only postsecular in the way just described, but also politically radical. In particular, it explores the extent to which these theologians might contribute to conversations surrounding emerging forms of anarchism – sometimes called “postanarchism” – in response to neoliberalism. The theological means by which the three thinkers arrive at a radical politics are relevant to anarchist theory and conversations about radical resistance, but it is Yoder’s comprehensively nonviolent politics that has the most to offer postanarchist theory. This project is dedicated to my grandfather, William Deane Steiner. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my committee for their challenge and their patience. I would especially like to thank Dr. Arthur Versluis for his encouragement as my advisor and Dr.