DOCSLIB.ORG

SELECTED FLOW CHARACTERISTICS of FLORIDA STREAMS and CANALS by Donald W. Foose U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigat

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SELECTED FLOW CHARACTERISTICS of FLORIDA STREAMS and CANALS by Donald W. Foose U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigat SELECTED FLOW CHARACTERISTICS OF FLORIDA STREAMS AND CANALS By Donald W. Foose U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 83-4107 Prepared in cooperation with the FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION Tallahassee, Florida 1983 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR JAMES G. WATT, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information Copies of this report can be write to: purchased from: District Chief Open-File Services Section U.S. Geological Survey Western Distribution Branch Suite 3015 U.S. Geological Survey 227 North Bronough Street Box 25425, Federal Center Tallahassee, Florida 32301 Denver, Colorado 80225 (Telephone: (303) 234-5888) CONTENTS Page Abstract --------------------- ___________________ _ ____ _ j Introduction ------------------ -------- -_____-_____-__ ________ j Purpose and scope - - -- ----------------- ___-_ __________ j Acknowledgments ---------- - ------ ____ __ _____ _________ j Selection of discharge records ----- --------------------------- - 2 Data by station -------------------- ------ _______ _ _ _ __ -- 2 Station descriptions -- -- - --- ----- -- _____ _ 2 Hydrographs --- - - 2 Flow duration - -- -- ---- - __________ ___ --- -- g Low flows 10 Technique for constructing flow-duration curves -- -- ---- - -- 10 References -- ----- ____ ____ ____ _ _ ___ _ _ __ 12 Streamflow stations -------- - -- -- - - _____ 13 Index of stations --- --- - - - ----- - _____ 26! ILLUSTRATIONS Page Figure 1. Plot of duration curves for representative streams in Florida II 2-19 Map showing stations in the: 2. St. Marys River basin and the coastal area between the St. Marys and St. Johns Rivers - -- - -- 14 3. St. Johns River basin above the Oklawaha River 21 4. Oklawaha River basin - - -- ------ -- --- 31 5. St. Johns River basin below the Oklawaha River ------ 45 6. Coastal area between the St. Johns and St. Lucie Rivers -- 52 7. Kissimmee River, Taylor Creek, and Fisheating Creek basins 63 8. Everglades and the southeastern coastal area north of latitude 26 degrees 95 9. Everglades and southeastern coastal area south of latitude 26 degrees 118 10. Big Cypress Swamp and southwestern coastal area, including the Caloosahatchee River ----- -- --- - 129 11. Peace and Myakka River basins ----- -- - -------- -- 149 12. Manatee, Little Manatee, Alafia and Hillsborough River basins, Tampa Bay and coastal areas - - 163 13. Coastal area from Tampa Bay to Withlacoochee River and the Withlacoochee River basin ---- -- - --- - - - 187 14. Waccasassa and Suwannee River basins - --------- ----- 206 15. Coastal area between the Suwannee and Aucilla Rivers, and the Aucilla River basin - --- -------- ____ 221 16. St. Marks and Ochlockonee River basins and the coastal area between the Ochlockonee and Apalachicola Rivers --- 227 17. Apalachicola River basin including the Chipola River basin - - - - 236 18. Choctawhatchee River basin below Pea River, and inflow areas for St. Andrew and Choctawhatchee Bays ------- -- 240 19. Yellow, Blackwater, Escambia and Perdido River basins - - 248 III TABLES Page Table 1. Streamflow records for selected stations ------------------- 2. Duration tables of daily values for Kissimmee River at S-65E near Okeechobee, Fla. ------- -----___________-____-__--_ CONVERSION FACTORS [Factors for converting inch-pound units to International System of Units (SI) and abbreviation of units] Multiply By_ To obtain foot (ft) 0.3048 meter (m) mile (mi) 1.609 kilometer (km) square mile (mi 2 ) 2.590 square kilometer (km2 ) cubic foot per second 0.02832 cubic meter per second (ft3/s) (m3/s) inch per year (in/yr) 25.4 millimeter per year (mm/a) acre-foot per year 0.001233 cubic hectometer per year (acre-ft/yr) (hm3 ) IV SELECTED FLOW CHARACTERISTICS OF FLORIDA STREAMS AND CANALS By Donald W. Foose ABSTRACT This report contains data and statistics on low-flow frequency for 254 stream-gaging stations on Florida streams and canals. The selected stations have 10 or more years of continuous record. A site description, a 10-year hydrograph, and a table of flow duration are presented for each station. A computed monthly 7-day, 10-year low flow is presented for stations when flow is not significantly altered by dams, increased or decreased significantly by diversion, or influenced by tides. INTRODUCTION The flow of water in streams and canals is not constant. The flow fluctuates naturally because of variations in precipitation and because of man's activities. The effective management of surface waters depends upon a knowledge of the characteristics of the flow in the individual stream or canal. A knowledge of the frequency, duration, and amount of high, low, and sustained flow in the stream is necessary for the design and operation of structures to control the flow of water for municipal, industrial, and irrigation uses; for disposal of sewage and other wastes; for the construc­ tion of bridges and highways; and for recreational use. Purpose and Scope This report presents statistical summaries of flow duration and low flows at gaging stations in Florida with 10 or more years of record. These summaries provide a common foundation for use in hydrologic investigations and management of surface-water resources, and for administration of laws governing Florida's water resources. It updates a previous report, similar in content and scope, by Heath and Wimberly (1971). This report contains station descriptions; hydrographs for the latest 10-year period; and duration tables for stream-gaging stations with 10 or more complete years of daily discharge records through October 1979; and for gaging stations where flow is not controlled by dams, increased or decreased significantly by diversion, or influenced by tides. A monthly summary of 7-day, 10-year low flow statistics is also given. An alphabet­ ical listing of stations at the back of this report gives the page number where the station data are found. Acknowledgments Appreciation is extended to Martha Thagard of the U.S. Geological Survey in Florida who retrieved the basic data used in this report and who plotted the hydrographs, and to Linda Geiger, also with the Survey in Florida, who determined the monthly 7-day, 10-year low flow statistics. SELECTION OF DISCHARGE RECORDS Discharge records, from a network of gaging stations on streams and canals in Florida, have been collected and published by the U.S. Geological Survey on a continuing basis since about 1930. Records for a few stations are available prior to 1930. Table 1, period of record for selected stations, lists gaging stations in Florida that have 10 or more years of record. The stations are listed in the table in downstream order by hydrologic unit (Conover and Leach, 1975). The list indicates the ranking of streams, with each tributary indented two spaces. Also shown are the years of record for each gaging station. The "X" indicates flow in unaltered streams and the "R" indicates regulated flow. DATA BY STATION Station Descriptions The description of each gaging station includes information that should be considered when using the data. The "location" and "drainage area" were determined by inspection of the site and from U.S. Geological Survey 7.5-minute, 1:24,000 scale, topographic maps. The location is shown by latitude and longitude, by the nearest quarter section within the township and range, by county, by hydrologic unit, and by distance to a nearby town and distance to the mouth of the stream. The "Period of record" shows the periods for which there are published streamflow records. Circumstances that affect flow, such as diversion of water to or from another basin, transfer of water (after use) from a ground-water source to a surface-water source, or from a surface-water source to a ground-water source, or reversed flow caused by wind or tide, or interconnection between basins, are described in "Remarks." When these circumstances so alter the flow that reasonable annual low-flow frequencies could not be determined by Hughes (1981), or for the monthly summary included in this report, that also is noted in "Remarks." "Average discharge" is the mean discharge for the entire period of record. Under "Extremes for period of record," the maximum and minimum discharges and gage heights for the period of record are listed. When a maximum discharge or gage height that predates the period of record has been determined either by direct or indirect measure­ ments, it is listed under a separate heading, "Extremes outside period of record." Hydrographs The station description is followed by a plot of monthly mean flow, from October 1969 through September 1979, for stations in operation at the end of water year 1979. For stations not in operation then, the hydrograph is for the final 10 years before the station was discontinued. The flow is termed discharge and is plotted arithmetically for some stations, typically stations with a moderate range of flow and some negative discharge (reverse flow), and logarithmically for other stations. The units of discharge are listed along the ordinate as "Discharge in CFS," (cubic feet per second), Table 1. Streamflow records for selected stations. PERIOD OF RECORD 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 GAGING STATION 2 2 1 3 4 4 S S 6 6 7 7 e NAME AND LOCATION 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 PAGE ST. MARYS RIVER BASIN NORTH PRONG ST MARYS RIVER AT MONIAC GA ..... XXX XXX XX xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx MIDDLE PRONG ST MARYS RIVER AT TAYLOR FLA . XXXXXXXXXXXX I XXXX SOUTH PRONG ST MARYS RIVER: TURKEY CREEK AT MACCLENNY FLA ........ XXXXXXXXXXXXXXI XXX SOUTH
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Final Report of the Scientific Peer Review Panel on The
    Engineers, FINAL REPORT OF THE SCIENTIFIC PEER REVIEW PANEL ON THE Scientists Planners& www.waterandair.com Environmental DATA AND METHODOLOGIES IN MFL Establishment for the Econfina River Prepared for SUWANNEE RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT 9225 CR 49 Live Oak, Florida 32060 Prepared under Contract 03/04-137 By Water & Air Research, Inc. Peer Review Panel Ivan Chou, M.E., P.E. Louis Motz, Ph.D., P.E., D.WRE. Jeffrey Hill, Ph.D. E. Lynn Mosura-Bliss, M.A. December 2015 REAL PEOPLE REAL SOLUTIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page Introduction 1 SCOPE OF REVIEW REQUIRED BY THE DISTRICT 2 REVIEW CONSTRAINTS 3 TIMETABLE 3 RESULTS OF PEER REVIEW 4 REVIEW SUMMARY 6 CONCLUSIONS 8 Appendices: Appendix A – Resumes Appendix B – Peer Review Forms Econfina Peer Review Report for SRWMD.docx 1/12/2016 INTRODUCTION The Minimum Flows and Levels (MFL) Program within the State of Florida is based on the requirements of Chapter 373.042 Florida Statutes. This statute requires that either a Water Management District (WMD) or the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) establish minimum flows for surface watercourses and minimum levels for groundwaters and surface waters. The statutory description of a minimum flow is “the limit at which further withdrawals would be significantly harmful to the water resources or ecology of the area” (Ch. 373.042 (1)(a), F.S.). The statute provides additional guidance to the WMDs and DEP on how to establish MFLs, including how they may be calculated, using the “best information available,” to reflect “seasonal variations,” when appropriate. Protection of non-consumptive uses also are to be considered as part of the process, but the decision on whether to provide for protection of non-consumptive uses is to be made by the Governing Board of the WMD or the DEP (Ch.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Preliminary Manatee Mortality Table with 5-Year Summary From: 01/01/2019 To: 11/22/2019
    FLORIDA FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION MARINE MAMMAL PATHOBIOLOGY LABORATORY 2019 Preliminary Manatee Mortality Table with 5-Year Summary From: 01/01/2019 To: 11/22/2019 County Date Field ID Sex Size Waterway City Probable Cause (cm) Nassau 01/01/2019 MNE19001 M 275 Nassau River Yulee Natural: Cold Stress Hillsborough 01/01/2019 MNW19001 M 221 Hillsborough Bay Apollo Beach Natural: Cold Stress Monroe 01/01/2019 MSW19001 M 275 Florida Bay Flamingo Undetermined: Other Lee 01/01/2019 MSW19002 M 170 Caloosahatchee River North Fort Myers Verified: Not Recovered Manatee 01/02/2019 MNW19002 M 213 Braden River Bradenton Natural: Cold Stress Putnam 01/03/2019 MNE19002 M 175 Lake Ocklawaha Palatka Undetermined: Too Decomposed Broward 01/03/2019 MSE19001 M 246 North Fork New River Fort Lauderdale Natural: Cold Stress Volusia 01/04/2019 MEC19002 U 275 Mosquito Lagoon Oak Hill Undetermined: Too Decomposed St. Lucie 01/04/2019 MSE19002 F 226 Indian River Fort Pierce Natural: Cold Stress Lee 01/04/2019 MSW19003 F 264 Whiskey Creek Fort Myers Human Related: Watercraft Collision Lee 01/04/2019 MSW19004 F 285 Mullock Creek Fort Myers Undetermined: Too Decomposed Citrus 01/07/2019 MNW19003 M 275 Gulf of Mexico Crystal River Verified: Not Recovered Collier 01/07/2019 MSW19005 M 270 Factory Bay Marco Island Natural: Other Lee 01/07/2019 MSW19006 U 245 Pine Island Sound Bokeelia Verified: Not Recovered Lee 01/08/2019 MSW19007 M 254 Matlacha Pass Matlacha Human Related: Watercraft Collision Citrus 01/09/2019 MNW19004 F 245 Homosassa River Homosassa
    [Show full text]
  • The Caloosahatchee River Estuary: a Monitoring Partnership Between Federal, State, and Local Governments, 2007–13
    Prepared in cooperation with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection and the South Florida Water Management District The Caloosahatchee River Estuary: A Monitoring Partnership Between Federal, State, and Local Governments, 2007–13 By Eduardo Patino The tidal Caloosahatchee River and downstream estuaries also known as S–79 (fig. 2), which are operated by the USGS (fig. 1) have substantial environmental, recreational, and economic in cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Lee value for southwest Florida residents and visitors. Modifications to County, and the City of Cape Coral. Additionally, a monitor- the Caloosahatchee River watershed have altered the predevelop- ing station was operated on Sanibel Island from 2010 to 2013 ment hydrology, thereby threatening the environmental health of (fig. 1) as part of the USGS Greater Everglades Priority Eco- estuaries in the area (South Florida Water Management District, system Science initiative and in partnership with U.S. Fish and 2014). Hydrologic monitoring of the freshwater contributions from Wildlife Service (J.N. Ding Darling National Wildlife Ref- tributaries to the tidal Caloosahatchee River and its estuaries is uge). Moving boat water-quality surveys throughout the tidal necessary to adequately describe the total freshwater inflow and Caloosahatchee River and downstream estuaries began in 2011 constituent loads to the delicate estuarine system. and are ongoing. Information generated by these monitoring From 2007 to 2013, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), in networks has proved valuable to the FDEP for developing total cooperation with the Florida Department of Environmental Protec- maximum daily load criteria, and to the SFWMD for calibrat- tion (FDEP) and the South Florida Water Management District ing and verifying a hydrodynamic model.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Circumnavigational Saltwater Paddling Trail Segment 6 Big Bend
    St. Marks JEFFERSON St. Marks MM aa pp 11 -- AA Sopchoppy WAKULLA Sopchoppy SUWANNEE TAYLOR MM aa pp 22 -- AA LAFAYETTE COLUMBIA FRANKLIN Lanark Village MM aa pp 22 -- BB MM aa pp 33 -- AA Dog Island GILCHRIST MM aa pp 33 -- BB MM aa pp 44 -- AA FF ll oo rr ii dd aa CC ii rr cc uu mm nn aa vv ii gg aa tt ii oo nn aa ll DIXIE SS aa ll tt ww aa tt ee rr PP aa dd dd ll ii nn gg TT rr aa ii ll MM aa pp 44 -- BB SS ee gg mm ee nn tt 66 MM aa pp 55 -- AA Horseshoe Beach BB ii gg BB ee nn dd MM aa pp 55 -- BB LEVY Drinking Water MM aa pp 66 -- AA Camping Kayak Launch MM aa pp 77 -- AA Shower Facility Cedar Key Restroom MM aa pp 77 -- BB MM aa pp 66 -- BB Restaurant MM aa pp 88 -- AA Grocery Store Yankeetown Inglis Point of Interest MM aa pp 88 -- BB Hotel / Motel CITRUS Disclaimer: This guide is intended as an aid to navigation only. A Gobal Positioning System (GPS) unit is Crystal River required, and persons are encouraged to supplement these maps with NOAA charts or other maps. Segment6: Big Bend Map 1 - A US 98 Aucilla Launch N: 30.1165 I W: -83.9795 A Aucilla Launch E C O St. Marks National Wildlife Refuge N F Gator Creek I N 3 A 3 R I Oyster Creek V E R 3 Cow Creek R 3 D 3 Black Rock Creek 3 Sulfur Creek Pinhook River Grooms Creek 3 Snipe Island Unit Pinhook River Entrance N: 30.0996 I W: -84.0157 Aucilla River 6 Cabell Point 3 Cobb Rocks Gamble Point 3 Gamble Point 6 Sand Creek Econfina Primitive Campsite N: 30.0771 I W: -83.9892 B Econfina River State Park Big Bend Seagrasses Aquatic Preserve Rose Creek 6 12 Econfina Landing A N: 30.1166
    [Show full text]
  • Collier Miami-Dade Palm Beach Hendry Broward Glades St
    Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission F L O R ID A 'S T U R N P IK E er iv R ee m Lakewood Park m !( si is O K L D INDRIO ROAD INDRIO RD D H I N COUNTY BCHS Y X I L A I E O W L H H O W G Y R I D H UCIE BLVD ST L / S FT PRCE ILT SRA N [h G Fort Pierce Inlet E 4 F N [h I 8 F AVE "Q" [h [h A K A V R PELICAN YACHT CLUB D E . FORT PIERCE CITY MARINA [h NGE AVE . OKEECHOBEE RA D O KISSIMMEE RIVER PUA NE 224 ST / CR 68 D R !( A D Fort Pierce E RD. OS O H PIC R V R T I L A N N A M T E W S H N T A E 3 O 9 K C A R-6 A 8 O / 1 N K 0 N C 6 W C W R 6 - HICKORY HAMMOCK WMA - K O R S 1 R L S 6 R N A E 0 E Lake T B P U Y H D A K D R is R /NW 160TH E si 68 ST. O m R H C A me MIDWAY RD. e D Ri Jernigans Pond Palm Lake FMA ver HUTCHINSON ISL . O VE S A t C . T I IA EASY S N E N L I u D A N.E. 120 ST G c I N R i A I e D South N U R V R S R iv I 9 I V 8 FLOR e V ESTA DR r E ST.
    [Show full text]
  • Segment 6 Map Book
    St. Marks JEFFERSON St. Marks MM aa pp 11 -- AA Sopchoppy WAKULLA Sopchoppy SUWANNEE TAYLOR MM aa pp 22 -- AA LAFAYETTE COLUMBIA FRANKLIN Lanark Village MM aa pp 22 -- BB MM aa pp 33 -- AA Dog Island GILCHRIST MM aa pp 33 -- BB MM aa pp 44 -- AA DIXIE FF ll oo rr ii dd aa CC ii rr cc uu mm nn aa vv ii gg aa tt ii oo nn aa ll SS aa ll tt ww aa tt ee rr PP aa dd dd ll ii nn gg TT rr aa ii ll MM aa pp 44 -- BB SS ee gg mm ee nn tt 66 MM aa pp 55 -- AA Horseshoe Beach BB ii gg BB ee nn dd MM aa pp 55 -- BB LEVY Drinking Water MM aa pp 66 -- AA Camping Kayak Launch MM aa pp 77 -- AA Shower Facility Cedar Key Restroom MM aa pp 77 -- BB MM aa pp 66 -- BB Restaurant MM aa pp 88 -- AA Grocery Store Yankeetown Inglis Point of Interest MM aa pp 88 -- BB Hotel / Motel CITRUS Disclaimer: This guide is intended as an aid to navigation only. A Gobal Positioning System (GPS) unit is Crystal River required, and persons are encouraged to supplement these maps with NOAA charts or other maps. Segment6: Big Bend Map 1 - A US 98 Aucilla Launch N: 30.1165 I W: -83.9795 A Aucilla Launch ECONFINA RIVER RD St. Marks National Wildlife Refuge Gator Creek 3 3 Oyster Creek Cow Creek 3 3 3 Black Rock Creek 3 Sulfur Creek Pinhook River Grooms Creek 3 Snipe Island Unit Pinhook River Entrance N: 30.0996 I W: -84.0157 Aucilla River 6 Cabell Point 3 Cobb Rocks Gamble Point 3 Gamble Point 6 Sand Creek Econfina Primitive Campsite N: 30.0771 I W: -83.9892 B Econfina River State Park Big Bend Seagrasses Aquatic Preserve Rose Creek 6 12 Econfina Landing A N: 30.1166 | W: -83.9796
    [Show full text]
  • C-43 Caloosahatchee River Watershed Protection Plan
    Caloosahatchee River Watershed Protection Plan APPENDICES January 2009 APPENDICES A – Performance Measure and Performance Indicator Fact Sheets B – Management Measure Tool Box and Fact Sheets C – Northern Everglades Regional Simulation Model D – Nutrient Loading Rates, Reduction Factors and Implementation Costs Associated with BMPs and Technologies E – Caloosahatchee River Watershed Research and Water Quality Monitoring Program F – Plan Operations & Maintenance, Permitting, and Monitoring G – Potential Funding Sources H – Agency and Public Comments and Responses APPENDIX A PERFORMANCE MEASURE AND PERFORMANCE INDICATOR FACT SHEETS Appendix A Caloosahatchee River and Estuary Performance Measures Number of Times Caloosahatchee Estuary High Discharge Criteria Exceeded Performance Measure: Number of Times Caloosahatchee Estuary High Discharge Criteria Exceeded – Mean Monthly Flows >2,800 cfs and Mean Monthly Flows > 4,500 cfs Description – The Lake Okeechobee WSE Regulation Schedule is applied to regulate (flood control) discharges to the Caloosahatchee River, and subsequently to the Caloosahatchee Estuary, when lake stages are high. The Caloosahatchee River has primary capacity for local inflows and is only utilized for Caloosahatchee Estuary discharges when there is secondary capacity available. The number of times that the Caloosahatchee Estuary high discharge criterion is exceeded must be limited to prevent destructive impacts on the estuary. Rationale – Researchers have observed an increased rate of eutrophication in Lake Okeechobee from 1973 to the present. Symptoms of this eutrophication include the following: • increases in algal bloom frequency since the mid-1980s (with an algal bloom being defined as chlorophyll-a concentrations greater than 40 μg/L) (Maceina 1993, Carrick et al. 1994, Havens et al. 1995b), • increases in the dominance of blue-green algae following a shift in the TN:TP ratio (Smith et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Decision Document Regarding Florida Department of Environmental Protection's Section 303(D) List Amendments for Basin Group
    DECISION DOCUMENT REGARDING FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION’S SECTION 303(d) LIST AMENDMENTS FOR BASIN GROUP THREE Prepared by the Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4 Water Management Division May 12, 2010 Florida §303(d) List Decision Document May 12, 2010 Table of Contents I. Executive Summary 3 II. Statutory and Regulatory Background 6 A. Identification of Water Quality Limited Segments (WQLSs) for Inclusion on the Section 303(d) List 6 B. Consideration of Existing and Readily Available Water Quality-Related Data and Information 6 C. Priority Ranking 7 III. Analysis of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection’s Submission 7 A. Florida’s Group Three 2010 Update 8 1. Florida’s Water Quality Standards and Section 303(d) List Development 8 2. List Development Methodology and Data Assessment 10 3. Public Participation Process 11 4. Consideration of Existing and Readily Available Water Quality-Related Data and Information 12 B. Review of FDEP’s Identification of Waters 14 1. Review of FDEP’s Data Guidelines 15 2. No Pollutant Identified for Impairment 18 3. Aquatic Life Use Impairment 18 4. Primary and Secondary Recreational Use Support 23 5. Fish and Shellfish Consumption Use Support 24 6. Drinking Water Use Support and Protection of Human Health 25 1 Florida §303(d) List Decision Document May 12, 2010 C. Section 303(d) List of Impaired Waters 26 1. FDEP’s Addition of Water Quality Limited Segments 26 2. Section 303(d) List Delistings 26 3. Other Pollution Control Requirements 27 4. EPA Identified Waters 30 5. Priority Ranking and Targeting 30 IV.
    [Show full text]
  • 11-1 335-6-11-.02 Use Classifications. (1) the ALABAMA RIVER BASIN Waterbody from to Classification ALABAMA RIVER MOBILE RIVER C
    335-6-11-.02 Use Classifications. (1) THE ALABAMA RIVER BASIN Waterbody From To Classification ALABAMA RIVER MOBILE RIVER Claiborne Lock and F&W Dam ALABAMA RIVER Claiborne Lock and Alabama and Gulf S/F&W (Claiborne Lake) Dam Coast Railway ALABAMA RIVER Alabama and Gulf River Mile 131 F&W (Claiborne Lake) Coast Railway ALABAMA RIVER River Mile 131 Millers Ferry Lock PWS (Claiborne Lake) and Dam ALABAMA RIVER Millers Ferry Sixmile Creek S/F&W (Dannelly Lake) Lock and Dam ALABAMA RIVER Sixmile Creek Robert F Henry Lock F&W (Dannelly Lake) and Dam ALABAMA RIVER Robert F Henry Lock Pintlala Creek S/F&W (Woodruff Lake) and Dam ALABAMA RIVER Pintlala Creek Its source F&W (Woodruff Lake) Little River ALABAMA RIVER Its source S/F&W Chitterling Creek Within Little River State Forest S/F&W (Little River Lake) Randons Creek Lovetts Creek Its source F&W Bear Creek Randons Creek Its source F&W Limestone Creek ALABAMA RIVER Its source F&W Double Bridges Limestone Creek Its source F&W Creek Hudson Branch Limestone Creek Its source F&W Big Flat Creek ALABAMA RIVER Its source S/F&W 11-1 Waterbody From To Classification Pursley Creek Claiborne Lake Its source F&W Beaver Creek ALABAMA RIVER Extent of reservoir F&W (Claiborne Lake) Beaver Creek Claiborne Lake Its source F&W Cub Creek Beaver Creek Its source F&W Turkey Creek Beaver Creek Its source F&W Rockwest Creek Claiborne Lake Its source F&W Pine Barren Creek Dannelly Lake Its source S/F&W Chilatchee Creek Dannelly Lake Its source S/F&W Bogue Chitto Creek Dannelly Lake Its source F&W Sand Creek Bogue
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Habitat and River Reach Units for Aquatic Species of Conservation Concern in Alabama by E
    GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF ALABAMA SPECIAL MAP 248 Strategic Habitat and River Reach Units for Aquatic Species of Conservation Concern in Alabama by E. Anne Wynn, Patrick E. O'Neil, and Stuart W. McGregor - Geological Survey of Alabama; Jeffrey R. Powell, Jennifer M. Pritchett, and Anthony D. Ford - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Berry H. (Nick) Tew, Jr. State Geologist and Paul D. Johnson - Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources TENNESSEE Explanation Rivers and streams 4 Open water County lines 3 5 8 9 Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) 10 LAUDERDALE 6 subregion boundary LIMESTONE Strategic Habitat Unit (SHU) 2 39 MADISON JACKSON COLBERT Strategic River Reach Unit (SRRU) LAWRENCE FRANKLIN 7 MORGAN The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service DE KALB 1 MARSHALL in conjunction with the Alabama 20 22 CHEROKEE Department of Conservation and MARION Natural Resources and the Geological 18 37 CULLMAN GEORGIA Survey of Alabama have selected WINSTON BLOUNT ETOWAH watersheds and river segments in the five 19 38 major HUC 4 subregions in Alabama to focus 23 36 conservation activities for managing, recovering, FAYETTE WALKER LAMAR ST CLAIR 35 and restoring populations of rare fishes, mussels, 21 41 CALHOUN snails, and crayfishes. These Strategic Habitat Units 17 CLEBURNE 14 (SHUs) and Strategic River Reach Units (SRRUs) 32 33 JEFFERSON include a substantial part of Alabama’s remaining 16 34 high-quality water courses and reflect the variety of aquatic 31 RANDOLPH habitats occupied by these species historically and presently. MISSISSIPPI 30 PICKENS 15 The SHUs were selected based on the presence of federally CLAY SHELBY listed and state imperiled species, potential threats to the TUSCALOOSA TALLADEGA 27 species, designation of critical habitat, and the best available 29 TALLAPOOSA information about the essential habitat components required by 13 BIBB CHAMBERS these aquatic species to survive.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitat Use by and Dispersal of Snail Kites in Florida During Drought Conditions
    HABITAT USE BY AND DISPERSAL OF SNAIL KITES IN FLORIDA DURING DROUGHT CONDITIONS STEVENR. BEISSINGERAND JEANE. TAKEKAWA School of Natural Resources, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 and Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge, Rt. 1, Box 278, Boynton Beach, Florida 33437. Although originally ranging over most of peninsular Florida (Howell 1932), Snail (Everglade) Kites (Rostrhamus sociabilis plumbeus) have been restricted in recent years mostly to three areas in southern Florida: the western marshes of Lake Okeecho- bee; Conservation Area (CA) 3A; and CA2 (Sykes 1978, 1979, 1983). Severe drought in southern Florida in 1981 dried nearly all wetlands inhabited by kites. Water levels at Lake Okeechobee were at record lows (2.9 m msl) in July and August, drying 99% of the wetland area. Water remained about 1.5 m below scheduled levels until June 1982 when it quickly rose as a result of heavy summer rains. Only perimeter canals contained surface water from May- August 1981 in CA3A and March-August 1981 in CA2 when Tropi- cal Storm Dennis (16-19 August) replenished surface water sup- plies. After reaching scheduled levels in September 1981, water de- creased again until CA2 dried out in February and CA3A in early May 1982. In late May 1982, surface water rose quickly again to near normal levels. As a result of habitat unavailability caused by this drought, Snail Kites dispersed throughout the Florida peninsula in search of foraging habitats with apple snails (Ponzacea paludosa) , practically their sole source of food (for exceptions see Sykes and Kale 1974, Woodin and Woodin 1981, Takekawa and Beissinger 1983, Beis- singer in prep.).
    [Show full text]
  • St. Marks River Watershed
    St. Marks River Watershed Surface Water Improvement and Management Plan Update Northwest Florida Water Management District August 2009 Program Development Series 2009–02 St. Marks River Watershed Surface Water Improvement and Management Plan Update Developed by the Northwest Florida Water Management District under the auspices of the Surface Water Improvement and Management (SWIM) Program and in cooperation with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection Program Development Series 2009-2 August 2009 GOVERNING BOARD George Roberts, Chair Panama City Philip McMillan, Vice Chair Blountstown Steve Ghazvini, Secretary/Treasurer Tallahassee Stephanie Bloyd Peter Antonacci Jerry Pate Panama City Beach Tallahassee Pensacola Tim Norris Joyce Estes Ralph Rish Santa Rosa Beach Eastpoint Port St. Joe Douglas E. Barr — Executive Director ABOUT THE NORTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT The Northwest Florida Water Management District is one of five water management districts in Florida, created by the Water Resources Act of 1972 (Chapter 373, Florida Statutes) to address regional water resource issues while furthering statewide goals and policies. The District stretches from the St. Marks River Basin in Jefferson County to the Perdido River in Escambia County, covering approximately 11,305 square miles, or 17 percent of the state’s geographic area. There are 63 incorporated cities within the District. It is bordered on the north by Georgia and Alabama, on the west by Alabama, on the south by the Gulf of Mexico, and on the east by the Suwannee River Water Management District, which shares Jefferson County with the District. The District has worked for decades to protect and manage water resources in a sustainable manner for the continued welfare of people and natural systems across its 16-county region.
    [Show full text]