Illustrated Review

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Illustrated Review ILLUSTRATED REVIEW OF THE NAUGATUCK VALLEY. E~lBRACIKG : ANSONIA, DERBY, BIRMINGHAM, SHELTON AND SEYMOUR. _.\ RECORD OF 'THE DEV.ELOPl\IENT OF THESE CEN'fERS; 'THEIR PROGRESS IN COl\il\iERCE, l\L.\NUFACTURING AKD PQLITICA.L LIFE ; \\.ITH SKETCHES Or~ THEIR LEADINl; OFFICL.\L, BUSINESS AND PROFESSIO!\AL l\IEN. New York; So·fe1<eig11 P1.1alis1\i:qg <t1ld. Jh\~1<<t-fi1:1~ Go. 1890. HE world of to-day is the concentration and effect of all the thoughts, acts and energies of the past ages, and T the gradual development of the factors that combine to ·m~ke up modem eivilization, with all its accompani­ ments of social, commercial and political iife, can be traced only in those records that have, from time to time and from age to age, been left by those who successfully and faithfully portrayed the characters and conditions of men. This is as true of each community as of the entire race, and judged in this-the true light-the value and importance of a work on any factor of our commonwealth cannot be overestimated. The contemporary writer has far greater advantages and opportunities than those whose task it is to record, the events and portray the characters of a past generation. He -sees things as they exist, and has every facility for inquiry, and can instruct himself thoroughly in every detail; hence it is that contemporaneous writings are always most valuable in succeeding years and to succeeding recorders. Hence, also, the importa~ce-rarely realized at the time-of a faithful portrayal of the leading actors and factors in the social and commercial economy of the country. _.\nd in a country like the.. United States it is the civil history and development that must almost entirely occupy the attention of the student observant of his country's condition and progress. The aim and object of this work is to present in attractive form the salient features of certain communities and to place on record the factors and men whose force and characteristics have a material bearing upon both the present and future conditions of these communities. A succinct resume of the past history of these places is also added to give the work a wider scope and value. Owing to the prominence ana ever increasing importance of the trade centers located in that part of the Naugatuck ,ralley which lies about, or adjacent to, the confluence of the Housatonic and Naugatuck rivers, this work has been confined entirely to them, and the aim of the publishers has been to make the work in every way a worthy representative of these ambitious and progressive communities. THE PUBLISHERS. · ...... HE NAUGATUCK VALLEY extends from the wealth by supplying public wants and the needs of other T source· of the Naugatuck River to its junction enterprises, and to provide the means of livelihood to with the Housatonic. It runs through the State ·of a large and intelligent class of artisans and mechanics. Connecticut like a great thoroughfare through a city, Yet while filling this lovely valley with the hum of and both sides of this stream-street are lined with industry, Enterprise has not robbed it of its pristine establishments that send their wares over a great por­ beauty, but has rathe·r added to its attractiveness and tion of the earth's surface.. _.\Jthough the articles man- enhanced its charms,_ by •alternating its tree-fringed ~ SCENE ON THE NAUGATUCK RIVER. ufactured in this fertile belt are almost innumerable, heights and fairy vales with noble monuments of man's metal products predominate, and some of the plants skill and energy. devoted to the manufacture of brass, iron and copper Famed for its varied and picturesque scenery, this are in every respect among the finest in the world. ,alley possesses many points of attraction worthy of This famous Valley has been selected by man­ note. Of these High Rock is one of the most notable. ufacturers, in many lines, as the scene of their opera­ It is a favorite resort for picnickers and pleasure seek­ tions-an<l wiselv so as is attested bv the areat sue- ers, and the scenery is wil<l anc.l enchanting. Castle .; ' .. :.:, cess of the various industries along its factory-fringed Rock, near Seymour, is 200 feet high, and its bareness banks. Here genius, enterprise and capital haYe united is a striking contrast to the fertile valley abo'\·e which to produce an endless variety of useful articles, as well it towers. ..\ succession of fine cascades is to be seen as the machines to manufacture them ; to build im­ at Sherman's grove, and, indeed, almost every mile of the mense factories and tall chimneys ; to accumulate ,-alley supplies new and pleasing prospects to the eye. 8 ILLUSTRATED REVIEW OF THE NAUGATUCK VALLEY. The rapid waters of the Naugatuck afford ample ANSONIA. and cheap .motive power ancran unfailing supply where steam is used. The banks of the stream .offer innumer­ Ansonia is an enibryo city and among the commu­ able fine sites for factories, while, geographically; the ters of the Naugatuck Valley is superseded by Water­ valley is convenient to both of the great trade centers bury alone. Anso~ G. Phelps was the founder of the of the East, New York and Boston. village and the place bears his Christian name. On The widened valley formed by the confluence of April 16th,,,, 1889, the township of Ansonia was set off the Naugatuck and Housatonic rivers is peculiarly from Derby and has a government of its own, with offi- adapted to the requirements of manufacturers, as well ces in. Ansonia. The borough was incorporated in as affording large space for building purposes; and about 1864, but the charter was amended in 1871 and revised this point a cluster of ent~rprising, prosperous and in 1887. - ., progressive commercial communities have grown up. Twenty. years. before the in~orporation of the VIEW OF RAILROAD AND RIVER, NAUGATUCK VALLEY. Of these Ansonia is the largest and lies on the Nauga­ borough, sagacious business men had discovered the tuck less than two miles above the confluence. ·r hough advantages possessed by this point for manufacturing at present these communities are separate and inde­ operations, an_d the copper mills now known as the An­ pendent, each possessing a charter and local govern­ sonia Brass and Copper Company were started. In --· - ment of its own; it would seem that time and the 1848 the \Vallaces established the enterprise that is to- growth of which they give promise would ultimately day both an important and attractive feature of the unite all these places into one proud city. place. The Farrell Foundry and others followed, and a · Steamers formerly ran up the Housatonic as far steady prosperity, growth and expansion has been ex­ as Derby, and it is claimed that the first iron steam­ perienced by all classes of manufacturers in this thriv­ er in America plied between New York and this point. ing and industrious borough. Some of the concerns This mode of ·communication, however, virtua11y ceased have doubled their capacities and output during the after the·Monitor, a $30~000 't"essel, ~:is sunk by a col­ past d~de, and wares from Ansonia find their way to lision· off ·New York. In 1888 the proprietors of the nearly every port in the civilized world; and this suc­ Electtic Road built a steamer to run on the Housatonic, cess of the manufacturers of important articles in a lo­ but at present there is no steamer plying on this route, cality peculiarly adapted to manufacturing purposes is nor is such needed, owing to the fine railway facilities a guarantee of the continued growth of Ansonia in both enjoyed. population and wealth, for while the established indus- ANSONIA. 9 holding the reputation or being one or the best fire companies in the State. Some of the leading men of the borough are members of it. This compani~as organized in 1871 as the Eagl~ ·Hose Co. A Hook and ~adder company was subsequently connected with it and the presen·t name adopted. A.nsonia is the terminus of the Derby division of the New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad, and also lies on the line of the Naugatuck Railroad. It has thus competitors to carry its freight, and is within twenty minutes' ride of both New Haven and Bridge­ port, the two greatest ports of ~onnecticut. The social institutions of the place are clearly in­ dicative of its intellectual life, and its schools and church buildings are equal to those of many larger places. The \Vardens of the borough, since 1865, have been: . \Vl!. B. BRISTOL; D. F. HOADLEY, tries thrive and increase new enterprises will be at­ EGBERT BARTLETT, J.B. QUILLINAN, . tracted to the place to add to its prestige and augment ROBERT PECK, H. A. SHIPMAN, its growth. MICHAEL ,v ALSH, JNO. B. GARDNER, The population, according to the late census, is over CHAS. F. WILLIAMS, R.H. TUCKER, 10.000, and the growth of A.nsonia has not been of the HENRY B. \VHITING, J. M. \VHEELER. mushroom kind. All has been constant and regular, and is enduring, permanent and sta- CA,~v ...1C. ble. .. There is over four million dollars of capi­ tal invested in the manufacturing enterprises of this place, outside of the millions represen­ ted by the factory buitdings and plants, in which about four thousand operatives find employment. The Naugatuck River runs through the place, and the manufacturitg establishments are all on the east side of the stream, while West A.nsonia is a healthful and attractive residence portion of the borough ; but there are many handsome and even palatial resi­ dences on the east side, and the whole local­ ity is extremely healthy, for, while lying in the valley, the quick waters of the Nauga­ tuck afford the best kind of _drainage, and a •· large proportion of the dwellings are situated on the graceful slopes or stand on top of the tree-crowned hills that afford most pleasing views of the picturesque Yale through which the Naugatuck glides on its way to the sea.
Recommended publications
  • Naugatuck River Greenway Routing Study: Watertown
    Regional Naugatuck River Greenway Routing Study Table of Contents 1. Overview ............................................................................................... 3 2. Mission and Goals ..................................................................................... 5 3. Study Methodology .................................................................................... 6 4. Study Area .............................................................................................. 7 5. Potential Greenway Routing Analysis .............................................................. 8 6. Obstacles to Access and Connectivity (Gap Analysis) ......................................... 11 7. Affected Property Data ............................................................................ 12 8. General Construction Feasibility and Cost ...................................................... 12 9. Brownfields and Environmental Constraints .................................................... 13 10. Safety and Security ................................................................................ 14 11. Permitting Issues .................................................................................. 15 12. Coordination with Other Studies ................................................................ 18 13. Community Input .................................................................................. 19 14. Opportunities and Challenges ................................................................... 20 15. Recommended
    [Show full text]
  • Records of the New York, New Haven & Hartford
    RECORDS OF THE NEW YORK, NEW HAVEN & HARTFORD RAILROAD IN CONNECTICUT Compiled by: John J. Doody, PE & PLS Principal Engineer, CDOT March 1, 2001 Connecticut Department of Transportation District 3 Surveys 140 Pond Lily Avenue New Haven, CT 06525 Attn: John J. Doody Tel: 203-389-3110 Fax: 203-389-3169 Email: [email protected] RR valuation maps on microfiche (also in each District Office & Newington) Centerline and Topography for New Canaan Line, Danbury Line & Waterbury Line 1"=40', reduced to 1"=100', paper and digital. Maine Line topography and centerline, various locations from Greenwich to New Haven, 1"=40', mostly Railroad Stations. AMTRAK topography, New Haven to Clinton, 1"=40' Dodd Center NYNH&H RR Archive Map Index (to be completed 6/2001) Over 2,300 maps in Connecticut, Massachusetts, Rhode Island and New York east of the Hudson River, including New York City. Connecticut State Library RR Commission Records Index Over 8,400 decisions rendered by the Railroad Commission from 1860 to the 1960's. This references complete files, including maps, on land transactions that came before the commission, as well as other matters. Connecticut State Library RR Commission Map Index Over 1,500 maps pertaining to RR Commission hearings listed above, all in Connecticut. Railroad Company Index. This is a listing of over 100 RR companies that later became part of the NYNH&H RR, when they were founded, and when they were bought out by other companies. Connecticut Department of Transportation 1998 Rail Transportation Ownership and Service Map. Lists owners, status of all rail lines in Connecticut.
    [Show full text]
  • A Thesis Presented to the Graduate Faculty Of
    A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY OF WESTERN CONNECTICUT STATE UNIVERSITY by Mark Edward Anderson IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE MASTER OF ARTS For the ~raduafeDivision THE SHEPAUG VALLEY RAILROAD: AN AMERICAN STORY Mark Edward Anderson Bantam, Connecticut May, 1989 SHEPAUG VALLEY RAILROAD SERVICE AT GREATEST EXTENT JULY 1872 Intermediate Mileaqe Station- Litchfield Lake Bantam Morris Romford New Preston Washington Judd's Bridge Roxbury (Chalybes) Roxbury Falls f Shepaug (Southbury) Hanover Springs Hawleyville I { Stoney Hill (Plumtrees) k Bethel (via Danbury and Norwalk owned tracks, leased to Shepaug) Source: Shepaug Valley Railroad Public Timetable Dated: As above --TABLE OF CONTENTS SHEPAUG VALLEY RAILROAD STATIONS with INTERWDIATE MILEAGES SHOWN ........Frontispiece 1 MAP: WESTERN CONNECTICUT RAILROADS IN THE LATE 1800's ..............Frontispiece 2 -AN AmRICAN STORY ...............................Pages 1 - 69 APPENDICIES: Pages 70 - 83 1. PRO-RAILROAD PROPERTY OIJNERS LITCHFIELD, CONNECTICUT: 1870 2. PRO-RAILROAD LANDOWNING PETITIONERS ROXBURY, CONNECTICUT: 1869 3. PRO-RAILROAD LANDOLQIING PETITIONERS MORRIS, CONNECTICUT: 1869 4. WASHINGTON, CONNECTICUT PROPERTY OUNERS GRANTING RIGHTS-OF-WAY TO SHEPAUG VALLEY RAILROAD: 1870 - 1872 5. FOREIGN CAR MOVEMENTS; SHEPAUC-, LITCHFIELD AND NORTHERN RAILROAD: 1895 - 1898 6. EXCERPTS: SHEPAUG. LITCHFIELD AND NORTHERN RAILROAD ANNUAL REPORT: 1898 BIBLIOGRAPHY: SOURCES CONSULTED ............... .Pages 84 - 86 Prior to the mid-nineteenth century, Litchfield, Connecticut had thrived as a major crossroads of two post-colonial trunk routes, the New Haven to Albany and Hartford to New York turnpikes. This Yankee hill town boasted several good hotels and taverns of reputation, was seat of its namesake county and service center for many surrounding, smaller settlements. The stagecoach lines that travelled the two turnpikes had used Litchfield as a stopover and interchange point and had thus contributed to the town a measure of prosperity.
    [Show full text]
  • SHRP2 Railroad-DOT Mitigation Strategies (R16) Community of Interest Meeting
    MEETING SUMMARY SHRP2 Railroad-DOT Mitigation Strategies (R16) Community of Interest Meeting TO: Joe Taylor, FHWA Ken Jacoby, FHWA Pam Hutton, AASHTO Kate Kurgan, AASHTO Mike Loehr, CH2M Dave Solow, CH2M Susannah Kerr-Adler, CH2M PREPARED BY: Sherry Appel, Jen Smoker, CH2M MEETING DATE: February 7-8, 2017 VENUE: AASHTO, Hall of States Building, Washington, DC Purpose The purpose of this meeting was to gather invited members of the Community of Interest (COI) formed in support of SHRP2’s Railroad-DOT Mitigation Strategies (R16) product. The goals for the participants were to enable them to share best practices, lessons learned, challenges, and accomplishments; hear from each other about model agreements; learn about potential new processes with railroads and highway agencies; and most importantly, foster a collaborative environment in which to capture the most innovative ideas from all stakeholders for expediting project delivery. The COI meeting included representatives from 18 state departments of transportation (DOTs), 2 Class 1 railroads and 1 Short Line association representative. A special breakout session enabled the participated to discuss the status of their model agreements, including Master Agreements, Preliminary Engineering Agreements for Special Projects, Flagging Agreements, Grade Crossing Agreements, and Construction and Maintenance Agreements. The agenda is attached. All presentations are available at: http://shrp2.transportation.org/Pages/R16_CommunityofInterest.aspx. Participants (see attached registration record) •
    [Show full text]
  • Naugatuck Railroad Company 2 of 17 | Cover Letter Cover Letter
    1 of 17 | Table of Contents Connecticut Department of Transportation ECTI NN CU O T D C N E O P I A T R A NAUGATUCK RAILROAD T T M R E O N P T S COMPANY O F TR A N TIGER Discretionary Grant Application Table of Contents Contact Information (B) James P. Redeker Bureau Chief – Public Transportation Cover Letter ....................................................................................................................2 Connecticut Department of Transportation 2800 Berlin Turnpike B. Contact Information ...............................................................................................1 Newington, Connecticut 06131 C. Project Description ...................................................................................................4 860.594.2802 [email protected] D. Project Parties ................................................................................................................7 E. Grant Funds and Sources and Uses of Funds .................................7 F. Selection Criteria ........................................................................................................7 Project Information (K) G. Federal Wage Requirement ..............................................................................9 H. National Environmental Policy Act Requirements ...................9 i. Type of Project Freight Rail I. Environmentally Related Federal, State, and Local Actions ......................................................................................9 ii. Project Location J. Protection of
    [Show full text]
  • Housatonic Railroad Company 2 of 14 | Cover Letter Cover Letter
    1 of 14 | Table of Contents Connecticut Department of Transportation ECTI NN CU O T D C N E O P I A T R A HOUSATONIC RAILROAD T T M R E O N P T S COMPANY O F TR A N TIGER Discretionary Grant Application Table of Contents Contact Information (B) James P. Redeker Bureau Chief – Public Transportation Cover Letter ....................................................................................................................2 Connecticut Department of Transportation 2800 Berlin Turnpike B. Contact Information ...............................................................................................1 Newington, Connecticut 06131 C. Project Description ...................................................................................................4 860.594.2802 [email protected] D. Project Parties ................................................................................................................7 E. Grant Funds and Sources and Uses of Funds .................................7 F. Selection Criteria ........................................................................................................8 Project Information (K) G. Federal Wage Requirement ..............................................................................9 H. National Environmental Policy Act Requirements ...................9 i. Type of Project Freight Rail I. Environmentally Related Federal, State, and Local Actions ......................................................................................9 ii. Project Location J. Protection of
    [Show full text]
  • 7338-252 / I-95 Nerops Tech Memo 1
    Northeast Rail Operations (NEROps) Study Appendices This report includes three appendices: Appendix A. Project Steering Committee and Contact Information Appendix B. Interviews, Meetings and Outreach Appendix C. Resource List I-95 Corridor Coalition A-1 Northeast Rail Operations (NEROps) Study Appendix A: Project Steering Committee The project steering committee for the Northeast Rail Operations Study included the following representatives of I-95 Corridor Coalition member agencies: • Steve Slavick, New York State Department of Transportation, Lead Role • Robert Elder, Maine Department of Transportation • Christopher “Kit” Morgan, New Hampshire Department of Transportation • Steve Devine, Rhode Island Department of Transportation • Thomas Cahir, Massachusetts Executive Office of Transportation • Carmine Trotta, Connecticut Department of Transportation • Charlie Miller, Vermont Agency of Transportation For information regarding this project, please contact: • Marygrace Parker Freight, Mobility, Safety & Security Coordinator I-95 Corridor Coalition E-mail: [email protected] • James Brogan Consultant Project Manager for NEROps Phase I Cambridge Systematics, Inc. E-mail: [email protected] • Brian ten Siethoff Consultant Project Manager for NEROps Phase II Cambridge Systematics, Inc. E-mail: [email protected] A-2 I-95 Corridor Coalition Northeast Rail Operations (NEROps) Study Appendix B: Interviews, Meetings and Outreach The Northeast Rail Operations Study involved extensive outreach to stakeholders in the Northeast U.S., including
    [Show full text]
  • Naugatuck Train Station Visual Inspection Report January 2007
    NAUGATUCK TRAIN STATION VISUAL INSPECTION REPORT January 2007 Prepared by the Bureau of Public Transportation Connecticut Department of Transportation Naugatuck Train Station Visual Inspection Report January 2007 Overview: The Naugatuck Train Station is located across the Naugatuck River from Route 8. This station is a train stop along the Waterbury Branch of the New Haven Line. Like most branch stations, the Naugatuck Train Station consists of a low- level platform, a ramp, stairs, a shelter and a parking area. The historic Naugatuck Railroad Station building is located next to the current platform. The building is being rehabilitated for the Naugatuck Historical Society Museum. A portion of the parking lot is being used to stage the rehabilitation. The station parking lot is located on Water Street a few blocks from downtown Naugatuck. Due to the lack of trailblazing signs, one might have trouble finding the station unless familiar with the area. There appears to be little station illumination beyond the two floodlights behind the platform. There are no plans to install high-level platforms at the Naugatuck Train Station at this time. The costs would be excessive considering present ridership. However, the Department has initiated a separate study of the Waterbury and New Canaan Branch Lines to examine the future of each. Upon completion of this report, the Department will consider high-level access and other station options. Maintenance Responsibilities: Owner: CDOT Operator: CDOT Platform Lights: Metro-North Trash: Metro-North Snow Removal: Metro-North Shelter Glazing: CDOT Platform Canopy: CDOT Platform Structure: CDOT Parking: Town Page 2 Naugatuck Train Station Visual Inspection Report January 2007 Station Layout: Aerial Photo by Aero-Metric, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Naugatuck River Greenway Routing Study: Beacon Falls
    Regional Naugatuck River Greenway Routing Study Table of Contents 1. Overview ............................................................................................... 3 2. Mission and Goals ..................................................................................... 5 3. Study Methodology .................................................................................... 6 4. Study Area .............................................................................................. 7 5. Potential Greenway Routing Analysis .............................................................. 8 6. Obstacles to Access and Connectivity (Gap Analysis) ......................................... 11 7. Affected Property Data ............................................................................ 12 8. General Construction Feasibility and Cost ...................................................... 12 9. Brownfields and Environmental Constraints .................................................... 12 10. Safety and Security ................................................................................ 14 11. Permitting Issues .................................................................................. 15 12. Coordination with Other Studies ................................................................ 18 13. Community Input .................................................................................. 19 14. Opportunities and Challenges ................................................................... 20 15. Recommended
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 2, Issue 1
    Volume 2 Issue 1 ® A F Publication Vol. 2 SPEEDWITCH 1 CONSIST SPEEDWITCH®L STAFF William G. Dulmaine, Jr....…......PUBLISHER NHRHTA, INC. Charles O. Dunn..................….....EDITOR SPEEDWITCH MANUFACTURERS UPDATE ................................................................................................. PAGE 3 BY ETER ESS Peter R. Ness...................…….....EDITOR MODELING P R. N TECHNICAL REVIEW and RESEARCH….. Richard Abramson, MODELING THE NEW HAVEN Thomas Curtin, William G. Dulmaine, Jr., Wayne Drummond, MODELING A NEW HAVEN CLASS J-1 MIKADO 2-8-2 ............................................................... PAGE 8 Marc J. Frattasio, J. W. Swanberg BY LOUIS DIROSSO PROOFREADING………......Chris Adams, Richard A. Fleischer, Randy Hammill, Bill Lupoli, Bill Reidy, John Sheridan, Edward ACKDATING AN NTERMOUNTAIN EW AVEN AILROAD ERIES OVERED OPPER AGE B I N H R 117000 S C H ...... P 10 Sweeney BY DAVID BACHAND Chris Adams.................................PHOTO ARCHIVIST MODELER PROFILE – RICK ABRAMSON .................................................................................... PAGE 12 “Library of Congress card catalog no. 78-6451543” MODELERS’ GALLERY ........................................................................................................... PAGE 14 Web Site and New Haven RR Online Forum www.nhrhta.org TOWER TALK – BOOK REVIEWS AND WANTS ........................................................................... PAGE 15 THE NHRHTA MODELERS SHOP ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Valley Railroad Company 2 of 22| Cover Letter Cover Letter
    1 of 22| Table of Contents Connecticut Department of Transportation ECTI NN CU O T D C N E O P I A T R A VALLEY RAILROAD T T M R E O N P T S COMPANY O F TR A N TIGER Discretionary Grant Application Table of Contents Contact Information (B) James P. Redeker Bureau Chief – Public Transportation Cover Letter ....................................................................................................................2 Connecticut Department of Transportation 2800 Berlin Turnpike B. Contact Information ...............................................................................................1 Newington, Connecticut 06131 C. Project Description ...................................................................................................4 860.594.2802 [email protected] D. Project Parties ................................................................................................................7 E. Grant Funds and Sources and Uses of Funds .................................7 F. Selection Criteria ........................................................................................................7 Project Information (K) G. Federal Wage Requirement ..............................................................................9 H. National Environmental Policy Act Requirements ...................9 i. Type of Project I. Environmentally Related Federal, Freight Rail State, and Local Actions ......................................................................................9 ii. Project Location J. Protection of Confidential
    [Show full text]
  • 1 VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PLAN INTRODUCTION Connecticut General Statutes Section 22A-66A(J) Requires That Railroads Who Operate In
    VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PLAN INTRODUCTION Connecticut General Statutes Section 22a-66a(j) requires that railroads who operate in Connecticut and apply pesticides to their rights of way must file a Vegetation Management Plan (VMP) with the Department of Transportation on or before February 1 of each year and must send copies of the plan to the chief elected official of each town in which pesticides will be applied. The following plan is hereby submitted by the Connecticut Railroad Association on behalf of the following railroads (hereinafter, the “Subject Railroads”): Central New England Railroad Connecticut Southern Railroad CSX Transportation Housatonic Railroad Naugatuck Railroad New England Central Railroad Pan Am Southern Providence & Worcester Railroad Railroads in Connecticut must adhere to an extensive body of regulations promulgated by various state and federal agencies. The most comprehensive body of safety regulations is promulgated by the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), the agency that has primary regulatory authority over rail safety in the United States. In addition, the Surface Transportation Board has authority over a wide range of rail activities specifically designed to promote and protect the ability of railroads to efficiently and safely participate in interstate commerce. One critical aspect of the safety regimen that railroads must adhere to is the maintenance of their rights of way such that track, structures and various appurtenances can be inspected in order to protect the safety of rail operations, the safety of railroad employees and the safety of the public. Railroads in Connecticut and throughout the country follow a carefully defined process under which they inspect their track and structures in order to discover defects that could lead to derailments or other types of accidents that would be harmful to the railroad and its employees, harmful to the public or harmful to the environment.
    [Show full text]