DOCSLIB.ORG

Mayoral Selection Process Comments I City Council Should Not Be Able to Replace the Voters Choices 100% by Voters. If the City C

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mayoral Selection Process Comments I City Council Should Not Be Able to Replace the Voters Choices 100% by Voters. If the City C Mayoral Selection Process Comments I city council should not be able to replace the voters choices 100% by voters. If the City Council wants a say, they should vote like everyone else. A non-starter for effective leadership. If appointed by the Council there is no accountability. A whole representation is best. Absolutely not. Give the people a choice. Absolutely should be elected by the voters Winston-Salem. Absolutely should be elected by voters Absolutely the mayor should be elected by the voters. all voters in the city should elect the mayor. An issue voters should be directly involved in! Anything less than elected by the citizens is just dumb. Appointment of a Mayor by the sitting City Council would likely give way to cronyism, rather than representing the citizen of the City itself. Appointment of the Mayor by the Council would be outrageous, and give the Council too much control over the Mayor. This makes the Mayor answerable to the Council rather than the voters. The voters need to elect the Mayor. Are you kidding me with this question?!! Let the people choose the mayor, not a select few. Are you kidding? The Mayor should be elected BY THE PEOPLE, not by the City Council!. Good Grief! That was not ever brought out in your video, as I recall. As the face of the city and council, the mayor needs to be representative of all the voters not a majority of the council members. At-large voting for the mayor give the greatest voice to the most taxpayers in the city. bad idea for the Council to select the Mayor By no means should we leave the selection of a mayor to just 8 people. The mayor should be selected by all the citizens he serves. Citizens rule and should have the voice of their leadership. citizens should decide not politicians Citizens should get to choose who leads them (I would do away with electoral college for president if I could). Citizens should have the right to choose. Citywide support for the figurehead position is proper for me. Come on! Really? Definitely a voter-elected position! Definitely elected at large!! Democracy. The city council does not always represent my needs. Do not have strong opinion. Elected at-large allows for a choice "by the people." Elected by the people NOT the council. Elections are for the people, don't take that away! Better that voters elect than appointing one. Everyone should have a chance to vote for who they want, not just council. Feel strongly about this. The Mayor of the City should be voted on by the citizens not just eight elected individuals For the same reason I don't think the Mayor should have a vote except in a tie, the council members should not "elect" the Mayor. The people at large should elect the Mayor, less change of the council forming a power block, more accountability to the people. God forbid the city council have any more power. Mayoral Selection Process Comments Having the mayor elected directly by the citizens is essential, in my opinion. He represents all residents, regardless of party, and should be elected by all residents. He works for the entire city not an elected panel of people who may or may not be working for the benefit of the people. Hell no to a politically appointed mayor. She/he should be elected by the citizens of WS. I definitely feel that the voters should have the power to decide who should be mayor, rather than making that decision be based on dynamics potentially unknown to voters. I do not think it would be wise to rely solely on the judgment of city council members to appoint a mayor. I feel strongly about this, 8 council members have to right to vote on mayor, other than as a voter like all of us I feel these choices should be decided by the powers that be and people in office, The regular citizen such as myself is not knowledgeable enough to decide these matters. I feel very strongly about this one..... he should be an "outsider", not a person from "within" the ranks of city council. I have never heard of a council selecting a mayor. It is (and should be) and elected position -- an elected position BY THE PEOPLE (not just the council). AGAIN -- hot button issue. Too many "things" have been shoved down our collective throats over the past 8-10 years and I fear that the council electing a mayor would turn into one of those. I have never heard of city residents not being able to select the mayor I hope this question is a joke. Obviously the mayor should be elected by the voters. I like to see some separation from mayor and council. The citizens are the ones to make the decision on who is mayor. I prefer leaving more control with the voters. I see no reason to change to a different system. Appointment of mayor by council members opens up a door to political manipulation and other types of worse corruption. I think it is important that the mayor should be elected directly by the citizens rather than risk that he be beholden to a majority of council representatives. I think the current system of an elected Mayor with the Council selecting the Mayor Pro Tem from their ranks works well essentially giving us a Vice Mayor without the overhead of another elected office. I think voters should have a direct input to selection of the mayor I want to vote for the mayor rather than city council vote on my behalf. I want voters to decide who the mayor is. I would absolutely move out of this city if the mayor's appointment was left up to the members of the City Council. This would be doing a grave disservice to the citizens of this city!!! If City Council selected our mayor, this would take power away from the citizens of City of Winston-Salem. Let us be involved in how we take care of our City! If he/she represents the entire city, the entire city should be able to vote for him/her (not just a handful of elected officials). Plus, Council members would appoint their friends or the highest bidder. If the City Council chooses that makes the mayor one step more removed from the people. If the council appointed it could be partisan whereas a true election reveals the will of the people as much as possible. If the mayor is elected by the council then his obligations would lean towards the ruling majority of the council. The mayor needs to be held accountable by the people. If the mayor is required to break ties (assuming the mayor is non-voting) then the mayor must be elected. If they mayor is appointed from the membership of there would have to be an odd number of city council members to avoid ties. Mayoral Selection Process Comments If the mayor is selected within the council it might be more representative, as long as the council members were selected by wards. In no way should the Mayor be selected from within the Council. This gives way to too many potential conflicts - the Mayor needs to win an election of all the people of the city. It is good for the people to directly pick the mayor. Especially necessary if elections were to go non-partisan. It is more democratic for the community to have a direct say in who their mayor is. It should be the cities choice as a whole It will make his job easier to have the community's support. It would be anti democratic to not allow citizens to vote for the mayor It would be nice if it could also be non-partisan. It's a people's decision. Not a particular person's decision. It's called democracy It's the right and responsibility of the citizens to elect the mayor. See #5. Just as the power of the mayor should not be over extended, neither should the city council hold that much power. If they choose the mayor, you end up with a biased, lop-sided council with a specific agenda. That would be like having the state legislature choose the governor. Lessen confusion Let the people decide Let the voters decide. Let the votes matter Let us vote for mayor Let voters choose our mayor Majority rules.NOT LIKE THE FAIR VOTE Make term limits Makes the mayor more responsible to the goters Mayors answer to the voters, not the council, so they should be elected by the voters More likely mayor can be impartial leader. Never, ever should the Mayor be appointed. Nice try, council members. No governing body should choose it's own leadership No need to comment on this! NO NO NO to the City Council electing our Mayor!!!!! Everyone needs to have a say in who our Mayor is, not just a small number of people - that is a VERY BAD idea! No preference None Not all Mayors are elected, I, however, believe that they all should be. Not broken; don't fix. Of course the Mayor should be elected at-large. It is a SERIOUS conflict of interest when the Council can vote on the job of anyone, because then that person is in their pockets if not voted for by citizens. I promise you if Mr Garrity was elected, for example, he would still be City Manager and the only difference is he would RIGHTLY be able to tell the City Council what to do and not the other way around.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Adaptation Strategies of Islamist Movements April 2017 Contents
    POMEPS STUDIES 26 islam in a changing middle east Adaptation Strategies of Islamist Movements April 2017 Contents Understanding repression-adaptation nexus in Islamist movements . 4 Khalil al-Anani, Doha Institute for Graduate Studies, Qatar Why Exclusion and Repression of Moderate Islamists Will Be Counterproductive . 8 Jillian Schwedler, Hunter College, CUNY Islamists After the “Arab Spring”: What’s the Right Research Question and Comparison Group, and Why Does It Matter? . 12 Elizabeth R. Nugent, Princeton University The Islamist voter base during the Arab Spring: More ideology than protest? . .. 16 Eva Wegner, University College Dublin When Islamist Parties (and Women) Govern: Strategy, Authenticity and Women’s Representation . 21 Lindsay J. Benstead, Portland State University Exit, Voice, and Loyalty Under the Islamic State . 26 Mara Revkin, Yale University and Ariel I. Ahram, Virginia Tech The Muslim Brotherhood Between Party and Movement . 31 Steven Brooke, The University of Louisville A Government of the Opposition: How Moroccan Islamists’ Dual Role Contributes to their Electoral Success . 34 Quinn Mecham, Brigham Young University The Cost of Inclusion: Ennahda and Tunisia’s Political Transition . 39 Monica Marks, University of Oxford Regime Islam, State Islam, and Political Islam: The Past and Future Contest . 43 Nathan J. Brown, George Washington University Middle East regimes are using ‘moderate’ Islam to stay in power . 47 Annelle Sheline, George Washington University Reckoning with a Fractured Islamist Landscape in Yemen . 49 Stacey Philbrick Yadav, Hobart and William Smith Colleges The Lumpers and the Splitters: Two very different policy approaches on dealing with Islamism . 54 Marc Lynch, George Washington University The Project on Middle East Political Science The Project on Middle East Political Science (POMEPS) is a collaborative network that aims to increase the impact of political scientists specializing in the study of the Middle East in the public sphere and in the academic community .
    [Show full text]
  • Redistricting Need Not Be a Quintessentially Political Process
    Independent Redistricting Commissions for U.S. Cities: Redistricting Need Not Be a Quintessentially Political Process: By Steve Bickerstaff* Page Introduction. 1 Part I City Redistricting and Political and Personal Self-Interest . 2 Part II Models for City Redistricting Commissions. 7 Part III The Argument for an Independent Redistricting Commission For Cities. 16 Part IV Designing an Independent Redistricting Commission For Cities. 20 Conclusion. 35 *Steve Bickerstaff retired from the University Of Texas School Of Law in 2012. He has represented state and local government jurisdictions on redistricting matters for over 35 years. He wishes to thank Professors Patrick Wooley and Joseph Fishkin and the members of the Austin, Texas Independent Redistricting Commission for their thoughtful recommendations during the preparation of this article. Independent Redistricting Commissions for U.S. Cities: Redistricting Need Not Be a Quintessentially Political Process: By Steve Bickerstaff Much has been written about the use of redistricting commissions for redrawing state legislative and congressional district lines. By contrast, virtually nothing has been written about the use of redistricting commissions at the municipal level of government. This is particularly surprising because virtually all large and middle size U.S. cities use at least some election districts that must be redrawn every ten years, and because many of these cities are charter or home-rule jurisdictions that generally have broad legal authority to adopt their own process for drawing local election district boundaries. A premise of this article is that the redistricting of city council districts need not be a quintessentially political process. I accept that party and faction politics are an unavoidable part of law-making even at the city level.
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Economy of Business Groups in Developing Countries
    Studies in Comparative International Development https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-021-09339-4 Trust and Envy: the Political Economy of Business Groups in Developing Countries Nathaniel H. Lef1 · Rachael Behr2 · Jefry Frieden3 · Shelby Grossman4 Accepted: 18 June 2021 © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021 Abstract Diversifed business groups play a major role in the economies of many developing countries. Business group members, often from the same communal, ethnic, or tribal group, have or develop interpersonal relations that make it easier to obtain informa- tion and monitor compliance related to transactions that require a strong measure of trust. This in-group cohesion facilitates proftable and productive economic activity. However, it can create resentment among other members of society who are barred from membership in a group that is, of necessity, exclusive. This envy can fuel a self-reinforcing cycle of societal hostility and group protectiveness that can deprive society of the economic benefts the groups can provide. There are several possible reactions such as “afrmative action” programs that can slow or stop the cycle of envy and group vulnerability. Keywords Diversifed business groups · Business groups · Property rights · Afrmative action · Minority trading groups Introduction Business groups are ubiquitous in the economies of many countries in Africa, Asia, and Latin America (Khanna and Yafeh 2007). They help mitigate informational and other contractual
    [Show full text]
  • Regulation, Trust, and Cronyism in Middle Eastern Societies: the Simple Economics of 'Wasta'
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Barnett, Andy; Yandle, Bruce; Naufal, George S. Working Paper Regulation, trust, and cronyism in Middle Eastern societies: The simple economics of 'wasta' IZA Discussion Papers, No. 7201 Provided in Cooperation with: IZA – Institute of Labor Economics Suggested Citation: Barnett, Andy; Yandle, Bruce; Naufal, George S. (2013) : Regulation, trust, and cronyism in Middle Eastern societies: The simple economics of 'wasta', IZA Discussion Papers, No. 7201, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/71609 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen
    [Show full text]
  • The Unseen Costs of Tax Cronyism: Favoritism and Foregone Growth by William Freeland, Ben Wilterdink and Jonathan Williams
    alec.org JULY 2014 STATEthe FACTORA PUBLICATION OF THE AMERICAN LEGISLATIVE EXCHANGE COUNCIL The Unseen Costs of Tax Cronyism: Favoritism and Foregone Growth By William Freeland, Ben Wilterdink and Jonathan Williams Executive Summary serious public policy problem. Cronyism in tax policy is no exception. It stifles competitive tax policy by precipitating tax rate increases on the olicymakers across the country continue to look for the best poli- firms not in favor with policymakers, subverts market outcomes for in- P cies that will encourage more businesses to invest in their state. As ferior economic planning, and introduces a deep temptation for public lawmakers consider tax reform, they should reference the guiding prin- corruptions. ciples outlined in the ALEC Principles of Taxation, which include fairness, transparency and competitiveness. In the most recent year in which each state published their respective tax expenditure reports, the sum of tax carve-outs was as follows: $228 Policymakers looking to enhance economic prosperity in their states billion for personal income and business earnings tax exemptions and face two diametrically opposed strategies with respect to their tax $260.1 billion in sales tax exemptions. This figure largely ignores target- codes. They can embrace low, broad-based taxes with zero or minimal ed tax breaks by states to individual businesses, which The New York carve-outs and special preferences. This approach, referred to by this paper as growth through markets, provides all businesses, large and small, with an equal opportunity to grow. On the other hand, policy- makers can embrace cronyism by providing certain businesses and in- To learn more about how the American dustries with special targeted tax breaks and tax carve-outs.
    [Show full text]
  • Before and After Segregation and Apartheid: a Comparative Analysis
    NEW CITIES NEW ECONOMIES Before and After Segregation and Apartheid: A Comparative Analysis By Leland Ware | Peer Review Introduction This article compares conditions in South Africa elimination of apartheid in South Africa, significant before and after apartheid to the circumstances in improvements have been made, but most poor Black America during and after segregation. During the eras people still reside in impoverished communities in of segregation and apartheid, conditions for Black townships and the countryside. people in America and South Africa were oppressive in the extreme. The two systems had some differences, The broad-based, grass roots, Civil Rights movement but the overall impact was the same. Black people started in America in the 1950s. Over the next decade, were physically separated and treated differently, marches, boycotts, and other forms of nonviolent and less favourably, than their white counterparts. protests were organised and executed. These activities The progress made by African Americans during culminated with the enactment of the Civil Rights the 50 years since the end of segregation has been Act of 1964, the Voting Rights Act of 1965, and the Fair substantial, but significant disparities between Black Housing Act of 1968. In the years that followed, African and white people still linger. In the 25 years since the Americans made significant advances in educational Volume 85 / 2020 63 NEW CITIES NEW ECONOMIES attainment levels, employment opportunities, family income, home ownership, and wealth. The South African government In South Africa, Black people and other non-white is in danger of becoming the groups stepped up their opposition to apartheid in political stereotype of what is the 1950s.
    [Show full text]
  • References to Caste-Based Discrimination in Reports and Statements Presented at the 28Th Session of the Human Rights Council, March 2015
    IDSN March 2015 References to Caste-Based Discrimination in reports and statements presented at the 28th session of the Human Rights Council, March 2015 Statement of the European The VDPA also affirmed the universality of human rights. Not disregarding Union in the General debate the importance of history, culture and religion it nevertheless states very on Agenda Item 8 Follow-up clearly, that it is – I quote – the duty of States, regardless of their political, to and implementation of economic and cultural systems to promote and protect all human rights and the Vienna Declaration and fundamental freedoms. Against this background, the European Union Programme of Action (VDPA) laments repeated efforts by some to undermine the principle of universality with cultural relativism. Values or cultural specificities, or any other March 23 2015 concept, cannot relieve States from their obligation to protect all human rights of all persons in their jurisdiction. In this context, it is also important to highlight what should be self-evident; that human rights protection is not afforded to groups, beliefs or ideologies but to human beings – whatever their race, ethnicity, age, gender, sexual orientation, religion, caste or migration status. The European Union will continue its efforts to promote and protect the universality of human rights in the Human Rights Council and elsewhere. Statement of the Special Improving the prevention of violence and atrocity crime Rapporteur on Minority Particular attention should be paid to urgently address the situation
    [Show full text]
  • Mccabe Advances Clean Government Blueprint
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE McCabe Advances Clean Government Blueprint JANUARY 18, 2018 - Wisconsin governor candidate Mike McCabe today put forward a comprehensive plan for freeing state government from the clutches of cronyism, corruption and what amounts to legal bribery of state officials. “Wisconsin was once known from coast to coast as a beacon of clean, open and honest government. Our state no longer deserves that reputation. I want a Wisconsin that is worthy of it again,” McCabe said. Once elected, McCabe will seek approval of a package of reforms to: * Create full disclosure of political donations and election spending, and set tighter limits on campaign contributions that are a quarter of what current state law allows. * Update Wisconsin’s conflict of interest law to prevent state public officials from taking actions benefiting donors who have contributed more than $1,000 to their campaign committees or spent more than $5,000 on election advertising favoring the officials. * Take redistricting out of the hands of elected officials who stand to benefit from the legislative district boundaries they draw and assign the task to an independent, nonpartisan legislative service agency in a process modeled after Iowa’s system. * Restore independent oversight of elections and government ethics by replacing party-affiliated elections and ethics commissioners with a nonpartisan agency headed by a board whose members cannot belong to a political party and cannot endorse or financially support candidates for partisan office. * Bring back civil service protections for government hiring to ensure those getting state positions are chosen based on what they know and not who they know.
    [Show full text]
  • The Global Expression Report 2019/2020
    The Global Expression Report 2019/2020 The state of freedom of expression around the world The Global Expression Report 2019/2020 II The Global Expression Report 2019/2020: The state of freedom of expression around the world III First published by ARTICLE 19, 2020 ARTICLE 19 Free Word Centre 60 Farringdon Road London EC1R 3GA UK www.article19.org ISBN 978-1-910793-42-8 Text and metric analysis © ARTICLE 19, 2020 (Creative Commons License 3.0) Data © V-Dem 2020 ARTICLE 19 works for a world where all people everywhere can freely express themselves and actively engage in public life without fear of discrimination. We do this by working on two interlocking freedoms, which set the foundation for all our work. The Freedom to Speak concerns everyone’s right to express and disseminate opinions, ideas and information through any means, as well as to disagree from, and question power-holders. The Freedom to Know concerns the right to demand and receive information by power-holders for transparency good governance and sustainable development. When either of these freedoms comes under threat, by the failure of power-holders to adequately protect them, ARTICLE 19 speaks with one voice, through courts of law, through global and regional organisations, and through civil society wherever we are present. About Creative Commons License 3.0: This work is provided under the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-ShareAlike 2.5 license. You are free to copy, distribute and display this work and to make derivative works, provided you: 1) give credit to ARTICLE 19; 2) do not use this work for commercial purposes; 3) distribute any works derived from this publication under a license identical to this one.
    [Show full text]
  • House Committee on Elections Hb 6
    PUBLIC COMMENTS HB 6 HOUSE COMMITTEE ON ELECTIONS Hearing Date: March 25, 2021 8:00 AM Britt Garner self Austin, TX This bill is not needed. There is no voter fraud to speak of in Texas and this is pure voter supression. Sarah Lewis Self Kerrville, TX I strongly oppose HB 6. I support expanded access to the ballot box. I support online voter registration, expanded voting hours and longer early voting periods. I support no-excuse vote by mail.?? Samantha Chang VDR, SELF Austin, TX I oppose HB6 and efforts to restrict voting and voters' rights. Texans already have hurdles to jump through in order to vote. Adding more prevents many eligible voters from voting. Cari Marshall Volunteer Deputy Voter Registrar Austin, TX STOP MAKING IT HARDER TO VOTE!!! I support expanded access to the ballot box, online voter registration, expanded voting hours and longer early voting periods. I support no-excuse vote by mail.?? Stop disenfranchising your constituents!! Katherine Diamond Self-medical coder Kerrville, TX I strongly oppose HB 6. I support expanded access to the ballot box. I support online voter registration, expanded voting hours and longer early voting periods. I support no-excuse vote by mail. Tony Zink Self San Antonio, TX Printed on: April 9, 2021 11:06 AM Page 1 of 540 Texas does not need more restrictions that prevent voters access to the ballot box. Texas is one of only 10 states that do not allow online voter registration. Limiting access to the ballot box is unconstitutional. Cecelia Gonzalez-Dippel Self/ Mayor of Floresville, Tx Floresville, TX I am Cecelia Gonzalez-Dippel, citizen and current Mayor of the city of Floresville, Tx.
    [Show full text]
  • NEPOTISM, CRONYISM and PREBENDALISM: an EXPLORATION of the MORES THAT REINFORCE CORRUPTION in NIGERIA's POLITICAL SYSTEM. Ifea
    Global Journal of Political Science and Administration Vol.8, No.3, pp.1-13, July 2020 Published by ECRTD-UK Print ISSN: 2054-6335(Print), Online ISSN: 2054-6343(Online) NEPOTISM, CRONYISM AND PREBENDALISM: AN EXPLORATION OF THE MORES THAT REINFORCE CORRUPTION IN NIGERIA’S POLITICAL SYSTEM. Ifeanyichukwu M. Abada (PhD) Department of Political Science, University of Nigeria Nsukka Fredrick O. Onyia Department of Political Science, University of Nigeria Nsukka ABSTRACT: The perception that Nigeria is a corrupt country has persisted for decades in spite of measures taken by successive administrations to mitigate it. This study explores the factors that encourage corruption in the Political System. It relies on the explanatory variables of Prebendal Theory. Employing survey research design, data were generated through interviews and documents and analyzed using content analysis. The central argument in the study is that, there are Mores and Belief Systems, rooted in Nigerian culture that encourages corruption. This is encapsulated in a Nigerian proverb: “One, whose father is in heaven, cannot be destined for hell”. The proverb purports that a public office holder must use the appurtenances of his office to benefit his cronies and relatives. The study recommends a cultural and moral reorientation to correct the erroneous impression that public office is a platform for dispensing prebends to relatives and cronies. KEYWORDS: nepotism, cronyism, prebendalism, corruption, mores. INTRODUCTION From January 1966, when Nigeria’s first military coup occurred, successive administrations have pledged to fight corruption. General Murtala Muhammed’s administration in 1975/76 did a massive purge of the federal civil service, ostensibly to fight corruption.
    [Show full text]
  • Capitalism Reborn
    CAPITALISM REBORN By DAVID W. SCUDDER March 2021 Email: [email protected] Phone: 978-356-3236 Cell: 617-309-6623 Preface For the past 250 years, the world has been blessed with astonishing progress. Economic well- being has improved throughout the globe. No more than 10% of the world’s people now live in abject poverty vs. well over half in the 18th century. Life spans have exploded; before 1800, most people lived fewer than 50 years, while in the developed world today an average person can contemplate more than 75 years of a reasonably healthy life. Most people improved their economic lots more or less equally over those two- and- a- half centuries. However, in the past 40-50 years, income inequality within many countries has grown exponentially, with the top 10% of workers in the US keeping about 90% of all gains in both incomes and wealth since 1980. And as growth in developing countries spurted, so did income inequality. The contrast between GDP numbers (very positive over the past five decades) and income inequality (very negative, for those not in the top 10% of the population) is stark. At the same time, discontent with the economic and political systems that encouraged these disparities has shot up, with the most recent survey in the US noting that less than 40% of people expressed trust in government. Both these observations are true. How do we explain the contrast between the very long-term picture, which appears so bright, and the more recent period, which is relatively disappointing? It is capitalism that is responsible for this contrast.
    [Show full text]