DOCSLIB.ORG

Significant New Records of Amphibians and Reptiles from Georgia, USA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Significant New Records of Amphibians and Reptiles from Georgia, USA GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION 597 Herpetological Review, 2015, 46(4), 597–601. © 2015 by Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles Significant New Records of Amphibians and Reptiles from Georgia, USA Distributional maps found in Amphibians and Reptiles of records for a variety of amphibian and reptile species in Georgia. Georgia (Jensen et al. 2008), along with subsequent geographical All records below were verified by David Bechler (VSU), Nikole distribution notes published in Herpetological Review, serve Castleberry (GMNH), David Laurencio (AUM), Lance McBrayer as essential references for county-level occurrence data for (GSU), and David Steen (SRSU), and datum used was WGS84. herpetofauna in Georgia. Collectively, these resources aid Standard English names follow Crother (2012). biologists by helping to identify distributional gaps for which to target survey efforts. Herein we report newly documented county CAUDATA — SALAMANDERS DIRK J. STEVENSON AMBYSTOMA OPACUM (Marbled Salamander). CALHOUN CO.: CHRISTOPHER L. JENKINS 7.8 km W Leary (31.488749°N, 84.595917°W). 18 October 2014. D. KEVIN M. STOHLGREN Stevenson. GMNH 50875. LOWNDES CO.: Langdale Park, Valdosta The Orianne Society, 100 Phoenix Road, Athens, (30.878524°N, 83.317114°W). 3 April 1998. J. Evans. VSU C0015. Georgia 30605, USA First Georgia record for the Suwannee River drainage. MURRAY JOHN B. JENSEN* CO.: Conasauga Natural Area (34.845116°N, 84.848180°W). 12 Georgia Department of Natural Resources, 116 Rum November 2013. N. Klaus and C. Muise. GMNH 50548. Creek Drive, Forsyth, Georgia 31029, USA DAVID L. BECHLER Department of Biology, Valdosta State University, Valdosta, AMBYSTOMA TALPOIDEUM (Mole Salamander). BERRIEN CO.: Georgia 31602, USA St. Hwy. 168, 3.9 km W of jct. with St. Hwy. 135 (31.177228°N, IAN DEERY 83.125489°W). 28 February 1995. R. Moulis and G. Williamson. 32 Millwright Drive, Hilton Head Island, South Carolina 29926, USA GSU 22356. DANIEL DUFF 5668 Post Mill Court, Buford, Georgia 30518, USA DESMOGNATHUS CONANTI (Spotted Dusky Salamander). SEAN P. GRAHAM GLASCOCK CO.: Unnamed tributary of Joes Creek at St. Hwy. 102, Department of Biology, Geology, and Physical Sciences, 1.8 km of Mitchell (33.22882°N, 82.68713°W). 14 May 2014. S. Sul Ross State University, Alpine, Texas 79830, USA Graham, C. Kelehear, J. Jensen, and B. Edelbrock. SRSU 6638. ROBB HERRINGTON 4502 North Tillery Drive, Phenix City, Alabama 36870, USA PHILLIP HIGGINS EURYCEA CIRRIGERA (Southern Two-lined Salamander). Kennesaw State University, 4563 North Landing Way, GLASCOCK CO.: Sphagnum seepage along Deep Creek downstream Marietta, Georgia 30066, USA from Blankenship Pond on S side of Blankenship Mill Road ROBERT V. HORAN III (33.25627°N, 82.54572°W). 14 May 2014. S. Graham, C. Kelehear, Georgia Department of Natural Resources,1 Conservation J. Jensen, and B. Edelbrock. SRSU 6637. Way, Brunswick, Georgia 31520, USA CRYSTAL KELEHEAR EURYCEA GUTTOLINEATA (Three-lined Salamander). CLAY Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Apartado CO.: Ravine along Ledbetter Branch, 1.6 km ESE of Ft. Gaines 0843-03092, Balboa, Ancon, Panama (31.59541°N, 85.04153°W). 14 May 2014. S. Graham and C. DYLAN KELLY Kelehear. AUM AHAP-D 00839. The Orianne Society, 100 Phoenix Road, Athens, Georgia 30605, USA KELSIE KINCAID HEMIDACTYLIUM SCUTATUM (Four-toed Salamander). 4724 Hwy. 135, Nashville, Georgia 31639, USA LUMPKIN CO.: 8 km W Dahlonega (34.536929°N, 84.031054°W). 17 LANCE D. MCBRAYER September 2009. G. Gilbert. GMNH 50512. STEPHENS CO.: St. Hwy. Department of Biology, Georgia Southern University, 184 at Tugaloo River (34.64407°N, 83.28468°W). 11 March 2014. A. P.O. Box 8042-1, Statesboro, Georgia 30460, USA Hall, C. Camp, M. Douglas, J. Hoffman, K. Norman, E. Rossignol, MATT MOORE S. Thomas, and J. Whitmire. GMNH 50695. 1617 Stanford Drive, Statesboro, Georgia 30461, USA CHARLIE, TRACEY AND ALLAN MUISE NOTOPHTHALMUS VIRIDESCENS (Eastern Newt). BARTOW 368 Eady Creek Road, Barnesville, Georgia 30204 CO.: 1.0 km SW jct. of Pine Valley and Pleasant Valley roads JUSTIN OGUNI The Veterinary Clinic West, 1100 Old Dallas Road, Marietta, (34.329335°N, 84.875640°W). 11 March 2014. J. Jensen, T. Patrick, Georgia 30064, USA and M. Medley. GMNH 50758. ELIZABETH M. SCHLIMM Joseph W. Jones Ecological Research Center at Ichauway, PLETHODON GLUTINOSUS (Northern Slimy Salamander). 3988 Jones Center Drive, Newton, Georgia 39870, USA CHEROKEE CO.: S. Cherokee Lane (34.075512°N, 84.468509°W). 14 WILLA VAIGNEUR April 2014. P. Higgins. GMNH 50877. 308 Herschel Drive, Metter, Georgia 30439, USA * Corresponding author; e-mail: [email protected] Herpetological Review 46(4), 2015 598 GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION PLETHODON GROBMANI (Southeastern Slimy Salaman- PSEUDACRIS CRUCIFER (Spring Peeper). BRANTLEY CO.: Jct. St. der). LANIER CO.: 2.1 km SW Stockton (30.932697°N, 83.021096°W). Hwy. 121 and Bay Road (31.16794ºN, 82.13242ºW). 9 March 2012. 22 October 2013. D. Stevenson. GMNH 50545. R. Horan III. GMNH 50295, 50296. PSEUDOTRITON RUBER (Red Salamander). CLAY CO.: Ravine SCAPHIOPUS HOLBROOKII (Eastern Spadefoot). CLAY CO.: along Ledbetter Branch, 1.6 km ESE of Ft. Gaines (31.59541°N, AOR Bluffton-Ft Gaines Road, 200 m NW of Huckleberry Creek 85.04153°W). 14 May 2014. S. Graham and C. Kelehear. AUM (31.55408°N, 84.97495°W). 14 May 2014. S. Graham and C. Kele- AHAP-D 00840. hear. AUM AHAP-D 00838. SIREN INTERMEDIA (Lesser Siren). CANDLER CO.: Canoochee TESTUDINES — TURTLES River at Stillmore Highway, 5.4 km SE Stillmore (32.426030°N, 82.161521°W). W. Vaigneur. 29 August 2014. GSU 25388. APALONE FEROX (Florida Softshell). LAURENS CO.: Private resi- dence on NeSmith Road, Dexter (32.396984°N, 83.082839°W). 6 STEREOCHILUS MARGINATUS (Many-lined Salamander). May 2014. T. Thomas. GMNH 50757. SCREVEN CO.: Horse Creek at St. Hwy. 21, 12.5 km ESE Millen (32.793188°N, 81.815821°W). 7 April 1999. T. Foard. GSU 23869. APALONE SPINIFERA (Spiny Softshell). CALHOUN CO.: 1.9 km Three large larvae found in pools of drying swamp. NNW Arlington (31.455767°N, 84.732517°W). 2 July 2004. C. Craig. VSU TE0022. SCREVEN CO.: 15.8 km NE Sylvania (32.810300°N, ANURA — FROGS 81.484418°W). 22 September 2013. J. Oguni and B. Boone. GMNH 50515. TREUTLEN CO.: 13.3 km SW Soperton. Oconee River GASTROPHRYNE CAROLINENSIS (Eastern Narrow-mouthed at St. Hwy 46 (32.295950°N, 82.697551°W). D. Stevenson. 24 Au- Toad). CLAY CO.: Chorus recorded along Bluffton-Ft. Gaines Road gust 2014. GMNH 50788. (31.52889°N, 84.94924°W). 14 May 2014. S. Graham and C. Kele- hear. AUM AHAP-C 0048. CHELYDRA SERPENTINA (Snapping Turtle). BRANTLEY CO.: St. Hwy. 82, 0.1 km N CR 68, E 0.2 km (31.20126ºN, 82.00816ºW). HYLA AVIVOCA (Bird-voiced Treefrog). CLAY CO.: Chorus re- 27 August 2011. R. Horan III. GMNH 50221. CLAY CO.: U.S. Hwy. corded along Bagby Parkway at George T. Bagby State Park 27 at Little Pachitla Creek (31.61711°N, 84.82995°W). 12 July (31.66371°N, 85.05223°W). 13 May 2014. S. Graham and C. Kele- 2014. S. Graham. AUM AHAP-D 00845. ECHOLS CO.: Statenville hear. AUM AHAP-C 0045. (30.701985°N, 83.027950°W). 6 July 2013. D. Stevenson. GMNH 50533. HYLA CHRYSOSCELIS (Cope’s Gray Treefrog). CLAY CO.: Cho- rus recorded along St. Hwy. 266, 2.2 km NNE of Ft. Gaines DEIROCHELYS RETICULARIA (Chicken Turtle). CANDLER CO.: St. (31.62725°N, 85.03888°W). 13 May 2014. S. Graham and C. Kele- Hwy. 46 at the Canoochee River floodplain, 6.4 km WSW Metter hear. AUM AHAP-C 0046. (32.384371°N, 82.126027°W). 5 July 2014. W. Vaigneur. GMNH 50789. HYLA CINEREA (Green Treefrog). CHATTOOGA CO.: Swamp off Everett Springs Road (34.528110°N, 85.116789°W). 31 May GRAPTEMYS GEOGRAPHICA (Northern Map Turtle). WALKER 2014. P. Higgins. GMNH 50794. WHITFIELD CO.: Lakeshore Park CO.: Hog Jowl Creek adjacent to Hog Jowl Road 2.8 km S of jct. (34.750814°N, 84.975696°W). 24 June 2014. K. Esters. GMNH with Captain Wood Road (34.683891°N, 85.408315°W). 10 April 50781. 2014. J. Jensen and C. Camp. GMNH 50697. HYLA SQUIRELLA (Squirrel Treefrog). CLAY CO.: Chorus record- KINOSTERNON BAURII (Striped Mud Turtle): WHEELER CO.: ed along Bluffton-Ft. Gaines Road (31.52889°N, 84.94924°W). 14 Little Ocmulgee Lake, Little Ocmulgee State Park (32.088084°N, May 2014. S. Graham and C. Kelehear. AUM AHAP-C 0047. 82.893400°W). June 2013. Photo of captive maintained by State Park staff. GMNH 50666. LITHOBATES CAPITO (Gopher Frog). IrwIN CO.: 12.0 km SW Ocilla (31.52479°N, 83.347385°W). 31 May 2014. B. Schlimm and KINOSTERNON SUBRUBRUM (Eastern Mud Turtle). ATKINSON M. Moore. GMNH 50765. CO.: 11.1 km S Willacoochee (31.240493°N, 83.039860°W). 19 March 2014. K. Stohlgren. GMNH 50754. LITHOBATES CATESBEIANUS (American Bullfrog). BRANT- LEY CO.: St. Hwy. 82, 0.1 km N CR 68, E 0.2 km (31.20126ºN, PSEUDEMYS CONCINNA (River Cooter). RABUN CO.: Lake 82.00816ºW). 9 March 2012. R. Horan III. GMNH 50279, 50280. Burton, Timpson Cove; 10.5 km WSW Clayton (34.878203°N, 83.400953°W). 14 July 2014. C. Jenkins. GMNH50786. TOOMBS LITHOBATES HECKSCHERI (River Frog): COOK CO.: Reed Bing- CO.: Old River Road 5.0 km W of U.S. Hwy 1 (31.976058°N, ham State Park (31.176612°N, 83.538607°W). 7 December 2013. 82.406225°W). 6 June 2014. M. Moore. GMNH 50783. K. Stohlgren. GMNH 50670. PSEUDEMYS FLORIDANA (Coastal Plain Cooter). BROOKS CO.: OSTEOPILUS SEPTENTRIONALIS (Cuban Treefrog). CAMDEN 16.6 km SE Quitman (30.676041°N, 83.441144°W). 26 June 2014. CO.: 112 Azalea Court, Kingsland (30.791284°N, 81.651727°W).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nonnative Reptilies in South Florida ID Guide
    Nonnative Reptiles in South Florida Identification Guide • The nonnative reptiles shown here are native to Central and South America, Asia, and Nonnative species are Africa. They were introduced to south Florida by human activity. sometimes confused with • Invasive species harm native species through direct predation, competition for resources, the Florida natives shown spread of disease, and disruption of natural ecosystems. Many of the nonnative reptiles on because their colorations this guide are, or have the potential to become, invasive. and patterns are very • Use this guide to identify invasive species and immediately report sightings of the black similar. Pay attention to the and white tegu, Nile monitor, and all invasive snakes to 1-888-IVE-GOT1. Take a distinct characteristics and photo and note the location relative to street intersections or with a GPS if possible. typical adult sizes listed on this guide to avoid • More photos can be found at www.flmnh.ufl.edu/herpetology/herpetology.htm. confusion when you • Be certain that an animal is a nonnative species before removing it. Warning-most encounter these animals. reptiles will bite or scratch if provoked. Nonnative Lizards NATIVE :- • ,,.., •· t ..... Look-a-Likes . ... ·-tt-..... • •. .. l . 1 '\..\ =- ' . ----.....·~·-· - - ',-<•'-' ' . \:,' . <! •.t'- . ,. '\. Dav id 13,irbsv ~ ·- ~ 9111'.', o:'"' w:' Black and White Tegu 2 to 3 ft. Dark bands with plentiful white dots between them Eastern Fence Lizard 3.5 to 7.5 in. Northern Curly-Tailed Lizard 7 to 10.5 in . Gray to tan with curled tail Florida Scrub Lizard 3.5 to 5.5 in. American Alligator 6 to 9 ft. Nile Monitor 4 to 6 ft.
    [Show full text]
  • Indiana Snakes Are Listed Here, and Not All Streams, Ponds and Lakes Suns Beside Creeks
    Midwest Worm Snake Carphophis amoenus satiny gray below with a brown or dark amber Fox Snake Elaphe vulpina This snake version of the earthworm is iris of the eye. The blue racer may show Blue This snake of marshes and wet places has brown above and has a pink belly and sides. It varying shades of gunmetal gray or blue above bold blotches, a grayish- or brownish-yellow is secretive and seldom seen, spending most of and below with a darker head and eye area. Mixed body and a dull orange/reddish head and tail. its time under stones, boards and logs where Racers move fast and sometimes appear to Black It vibrates its tail if cornered, but rarely bites. the ground is moist. It feeds on soft-bodied “chase” people. In fact, this behavior is often Snakes insects and earthworms. associated with courtship and may be used to drive an Black Kingsnake Lampropeltis getulus getulus intruder out of a territory. This glossy black snake has speckles of Rough Green Snake Opheodrys aestivas white and cream that may be less apparent in Smooth Green Snake Opheodrys vernalis Eastern Milk Snake older snakes. It lives on streambanks and in Both species are green above with white, Lampropeltis triangulatum triangulatum moist meadows, where it feeds on other yellow or pale green bellies. The rough green Red Milk Snake snakes, turtle eggs, mice and voles. It is snake has keeled scales that give it a rough Lampropeltis triangulatum syspila “V” generally secretive and can be found under texture. This snake, listed as a species of This snake’s taste for mice makes pattern boards, logs and debris.
    [Show full text]
  • Herpetological Review
    Herpetological Review FARANCIA ERYTROGRAMMA (Rainbow Snake). HABITAT. Submitted by STAN J. HUTCHENS (e-mail: [email protected]) and CHRISTOPHER S. DEPERNO, (e-mail: [email protected]), Fisheries and Wildlife Pro- gram, North Carolina State University, 110 Brooks Ave., Raleigh, North Carolina 27607, USA. canadensis) dams reduced what little fl ow existed in some canals to standing quagmires more representative of the habitat selected by Eastern Mudsnakes (Farancia abacura; Neill 1964, op. cit.). Interestingly, one A. rostrata was observed near BNS, but none was captured within the swamp. It is possible that Rainbow Snakes leave bordering fl uvial habitats in pursuit of young eels that wan- dered into canals and swamp habitats. Capturing such a secretive and uncommon species as F. ery- trogramma in unexpected habitat encourages consideration of their delicate ecological niche. Declining population indices for American Eels along the eastern United States are attributed to overfi shing, parasitism, habitat loss, pollution, and changes in major currents related to climate change (Hightower and Nesnow 2006. Southeast. Nat. 5:693–710). Eel declines could negatively impact population sizes and distributions of Rainbow Snakes, especially in inland areas. We believe future studies based on con- fi rmed Rainbow Snake occurrences from museum records or North Carolina GAP data could better delineate the range within North Carolina. Additionally, sampling for American Eels to determine their population status and distribution in North Carolina could augment population and distribution data for Rainbow Snakes. We thank A. Braswell, J. Jensen, and P. Moler for comments on earlier drafts of this manuscript. Submitted by STAN J. HUTCHENS (e-mail: [email protected]) and CHRISTOPHER S.
    [Show full text]
  • Contributions of Intensively Managed Forests to the Sustainability of Wildlife Communities in the South
    CONTRIBUTIONS OF INTENSIVELY MANAGED FORESTS TO THE SUSTAINABILITY OF WILDLIFE COMMUNITIES IN THE SOUTH T. Bently Wigley1, William M. Baughman, Michael E. Dorcas, John A. Gerwin, J. Whitfield Gibbons, David C. Guynn, Jr., Richard A. Lancia, Yale A. Leiden, Michael S. Mitchell, Kevin R. Russell ABSTRACT Wildlife communities in the South are increasingly influenced by land use changes associated with human population growth and changes in forest management strategies on both public and private lands. Management of industry-owned landscapes typically results in a diverse mixture of habitat types and spatial arrangements that simultaneously offers opportunities to maintain forest cover, address concerns about fragmentation, and provide habitats for a variety of wildlife species. We report here on several recent studies of breeding bird and herpetofaunal communities in industry-managed landscapes in South Carolina. Study landscapes included the 8,100-ha GilesBay/Woodbury Tract, owned and managed by International Paper Company, and 62,363-ha of the Ashley and Edisto Districts, owned and managed by Westvaco Corporation. Breeding birds were sampled in both landscapes from 1995-1999 using point counts, mist netting, nest searching, and territory mapping. A broad survey of herpetofauna was conducted during 1996-1998 across the Giles Bay/Woodbury Tract using a variety of methods, including: searches of natural cover objects, time-constrained searches, drift fences with pitfall traps, coverboards, automated recording systems, minnow traps, and turtle traps. Herpetofaunal communities were sampled more intensively in both landscapes during 1997-1999 in isolated wetland and selected structural classes. The study landscapes supported approximately 70 bird and 72 herpetofaunal species, some of which are of conservation concern.
    [Show full text]
  • COTTONMOUTH Agkistrodon Piscivorus
    COTTONMOUTH Agkistrodon piscivorus Agkistrodon is derived from ankistron and odon which in Greek mean “fishhook” and “tooth or teeth;” referring to the curved fangs of this species. Piscivorus is derived from piscis and voro which in Latin mean “fish” and “to eat”. Another common name for cottonmouth is water moccasin. The Cottonmouth is venomous. While its bite is rarely fatal, tissue damage is likely to occur and can be severe if not treated promptly. IDENTIFICATION Appearance: The cottonmouth is a stout- bodied venomous snake that reaches lengths of 30 to 42 inches as adults. Most adults are uniformly dark brown, olive, or black, tending to lose the cross banded patterning with age. Some individuals may have a dark cheek stripe (upper right image). The cottonmouth has the diagnostic features of the pit-viper family such as a wedge-shaped head, sensory pits between the eyes and nostrils, and vertical “cat-like” pupils. Juveniles are lighter and more boldly patterned with a yellow coloration toward the tip of the tail (lower right image). Dorsal scales are weakly keeled, and the subcaudal scales form only one row. Cottonmouths also have a single anal Mike Redmer plate. Subspecies: There are three subspecies of the cottonmouth. The Western Cottonmouth (A. p. leucostoma) is the only subspecies found in the Midwest. The term leucostoma refers to the white interior of mouth. Confusing Species: The non-venomous watersnakes (Nerodia) are commonly confused with Cottonmouths across their range, simply because they are snakes in water. Thus it is important to note that Cottonmouths are only found in southernmost Midwest.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Watersnake Selection of Fish Prey in Western Kentucky
    Northern Watersnake Diet . Perkins and Eason Northern Watersnake Selection of Fish Prey in Western Kentucky Micah W. Perkins 1, Department of Biology, University of Louisville, 139 Life Sciences Building, Louisville, KY 40292 Perri K. Eason, Department of Biology, University of Louisville, 139 Life Sciences Building, Louisville, KY 40292 Abstract: Watersnakes serve a variety of important roles in aquatic ecosystems with many species being of conservation interest. The northern water- snake (Nerodia sipedon) has some populations of concern, but is found in a wide variety of aquatic habitats throughout North America. Although pre- vious studies have examined the diet of this typically piscivorous species, research has not addressed whether the northern watersnake is preferentially selecting particular fish as prey. In this study, we sampled snake stomach contents and used Chesson’s alpha selection index α( i) to investigate whether northern watersnakes are eating fish families in proportion to their availability or are preferentially selecting or avoiding specific fish families. At the Sloughs Wildlife Management Area in western Kentucky, the northern watersnake fed on fish from six families in 2013 (n = 15) and 2014 (n = 36). Five of those fish families were eaten in proportion to their availability but avoided pirate perch (Aphredoderus sayanus), the lone member of the family Aphredoderidae. This is the first study testing prey preferences in the northern watersnake. Key words: northern watersnake, Nerodia sipedon, diet selection, fish family, pirate perch Journal of the Southeastern Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies 5:144–149 Many watersnakes are of conservation concern and can poten- igan shifted from a heavily amphibian-based diet to feeding only on tially be used as indicators to understand harmful human impacts fishes (Meyer 1992, Carbone 1993).
    [Show full text]
  • Hybridization Between Multiple Fence Lizard Lineages in an Ecotone
    Molecular Ecology (2007) 16, 1035–1054 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.03194.x HybridizationBlackwell Publishing Ltd between multiple fence lizard lineages in an ecotone: locally discordant variation in mitochondrial DNA, chromosomes, and morphology ADAM D. LEACHÉ* and CHARLES J. COLE†‡ *Museum of Vertebrate Zoology and Department of Integrative Biology, 3101 Valley Life Sciences Building, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3160, USA, †Department of Herpetology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY 10024-5192, USA Abstract We investigated a hybrid zone between two major lineages of fence lizards (Sceloporus cowlesi and Sceloporus tristichus) in the Sceloporus undulatus species complex in eastern Arizona. This zone occurs in an ecotone between Great Basin Grassland and Conifer Wood- land habitats. We analysed spatial variation in mtDNA (N = 401; 969 bp), chromosomes (N = 217), and morphology (N = 312; 11 characters) to characterize the hybrid zone and assess species limits. A fine-scale population level phylogenetic analysis refined the boundaries between these species and indicated that four nonsister mtDNA clades (three belonging to S. tristichus and one to S. cowlesi) are sympatric at the centre of the zone. Esti- mates of cytonuclear disequilibria in the population closest to the centre of the hybrid zone suggest that the S. tristichus clades are randomly mating, but that the S. cowlesi haplotype has a significant nonrandom association with nuclear alleles. Maximum-likelihood cline- fitting analyses suggest that the karyotype, morphology, and dorsal colour pattern clines are all coincident, but the mtDNA cline is skewed significantly to the south. A temporal comparison of cline centres utilizing karyotype data collected in the early 1970s and in 2002 suggests that the cline may have shifted by approximately 1.5 km to the north over a 30-year period.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix(S1:(Systematics(Of(The(Micrurus'fulvius(Complex(And(Taxonomic( Revision(Of(Micrurus'tener(
    Streicher et al. 1 Appendix(S1:(Systematics(of(the(Micrurus'fulvius(complex(and(taxonomic( revision(of(Micrurus'tener( Introduction(( Coralsnakes*of*the*genus*Micrurus*Wagler*1824*from*North*and*Central*America*have*a* complicated*taxonomic*history,*likely*because*they*have*a*highly*conserved*morphology* (Boulenger*1896;*Schmidt*1933;*1958;*Slowinski*1995)*and*many*species*possess*color* pattern*polymorphism*(Schmidt*1958;*Roze*1996;*Campbell*and*Lamar*2004).*Although* molecular*data*have*been*used*to*explore*enzyme*diversity*in*venoms*(e.g.*Tanaka*et*al.* 2010;*Renjifo*et*al.*2012;*Margres*et*al.*2013;*CarbajalSSaucedo*2013),*most* phylogenetic*analyses*of*DNA*for*species*involved*in*the*Micrurus'fulvius*(Linneaus* 1776)*complex*(sensu*Castoe*et*al.*2012)*have*been*restricted*to*the*nominate*form* (Slowinski*1995;*Castoe*et*al.*2007;*Pyron*et*al.*2011,*2013)*or*this*and*M.'tener*(Baird* and*Girard*1853).*Renjifo*et*al.*(2012)*found*M.'fulvius*and*M.'tener*forming*a* monophyletic*group*sister*to*M.'diastema*(Duméril,*Bibron,*and*Duméril*1854),*another* species*found*in*Mexico.*Thus,*the*relatedness*of*these*morphologically*similar*snakes* remains*uncertain*due*to*low*species*coverage*with*at*least*16*species*occurring*in* Mexico.** In*the*main*text*we*present*evidence*that*M.'tener*is*a*species*comprised*of* individuals*that*possess*one*of*two*divergent*mitochondrial*haplogroup*types,*but* collectively*have*nuclear*DNA*variation*consistent*with*a*single*species*that*recently* expanded*northward.*Although*it*is*beyond*the*scope*of*our*study*to*discuss*the*
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Reptiles and Amphibians Revoct2017
    CHECKLIST of AMPHIBIANS and REPTILES of ARCHBOLD BIOLOGICAL STATION, the RESERVE, and BUCK ISLAND RANCH, Highlands County, Florida. Voucher specimens of species recorded from the Station are deposited in the Station reference collections and the herpetology collection of the American Museum of Natural History. Occurrence3 Scientific name1 Common name Status2 Exotic Station Reserve Ranch AMPHIBIANS Order Anura Family Bufonidae Anaxyrus quercicus Oak Toad X X X Anaxyrus terrestris Southern Toad X X X Rhinella marina Cane Toad ■ X Family Hylidae Acris gryllus dorsalis Florida Cricket Frog X X X Hyla cinerea Green Treefrog X X X Hyla femoralis Pine Woods Treefrog X X X Hyla gratiosa Barking Treefrog X X X Hyla squirella Squirrel Treefrog X X X Osteopilus septentrionalis Cuban Treefrog ■ X X Pseudacris nigrita Southern Chorus Frog X X Pseudacris ocularis Little Grass Frog X X X Family Leptodactylidae Eleutherodactylus planirostris Greenhouse Frog ■ X X X Family Microhylidae Gastrophryne carolinensis Eastern Narrow-mouthed Toad X X X Family Ranidae Lithobates capito Gopher Frog X X X Lithobates catesbeianus American Bullfrog ? 4 X X Lithobates grylio Pig Frog X X X Lithobates sphenocephalus sphenocephalus Florida Leopard Frog X X X Order Caudata Family Amphiumidae Amphiuma means Two-toed Amphiuma X X X Family Plethodontidae Eurycea quadridigitata Dwarf Salamander X Family Salamandridae Notophthalmus viridescens piaropicola Peninsula Newt X X Family Sirenidae Pseudobranchus axanthus axanthus Narrow-striped Dwarf Siren X Pseudobranchus striatus
    [Show full text]
  • TPWD White List
    TPWD White List Frogs and Toads Great Plains toad (Bufo cognatus) Green toad (Bufo debilis) Red-spotted toad (Bufo punctatus) Texas toad (Bufo speciosus) Gulf Coast toad (Bufo valliceps) Woodhouse’s toad (Bufo woodhousei) Green treefrog (Hyla cinerea) Bull frog (Rana catesbeiana) Couch’s spadefoot (Scaphiopus couchii) Plains spadefoot (Spea bombifrons) New Mexico spadefoot (Spea multiplicata) Salamanders Tiger salamander (Ambystoma tigrinum) Lizards Green anole (Anolis carolinensis) Chihuahuan spotted whiptail (Aspidoscelis exsanguis) Texas spotted whiptail (Aspidoscelis gularis) Marbled whiptail (Aspidoscelis marmoratus) Six-lined racerunner (Aspidoscelis sexlineatus) Checkered whiptail (Aspidoscelis tesselatus) Texas banded gecko (Coleonyx brevis) Greater earless lizard (Cophosaurus texanus) Collared lizard (Crotaphytus collaris) Five-lined skink (Eumeces fasciatus) Great plains skink (Eumeces obsoletus) Texas alligator lizard (Gerrhonotus infernalis) Lesser earless lizard (Holbrookia maculata) Crevice spiny lizard (Sceloporus poinsettii) Prairie lizard (Sceloporus undulatus) Ground skink (Scincella lateralis) Tree lizard (Urosaurus ornatus) Side-blotched lizard (Uta stansburiana) Snakes Copperhead (Agkistrodon contortrix) Cottonmouth (Agkistrodon piscivorus) Glossy snake (Arizona elegans) Trans-Pecos rat snake (Bogertophis subocularis) Racer (Coluber constrictor) Western diamondback rattlesnake (Crotalus atrox) Rock rattlesnake (Crotalus lepidus) Blacktail rattlesnake (Crotalus molossus) Mojave rattlesnake (Crotalus scutulatus) Prairie
    [Show full text]
  • By a Nine-Banded Armadillo (Dasypus Novemcinctus) in Santa Rosa National Park, Costa Rica
    Edentata: in press Electronic version: ISSN 1852-9208 Print version: ISSN 1413-4411 http://www.xenarthrans.org FIELD NOTE Predation of a Central American coral snake (Micrurus nigrocinctus) by a nine-banded armadillo (Dasypus novemcinctus) in Santa Rosa National Park, Costa Rica Eduardo CarrilloA and Todd K. FullerB,1 A Instituto Internacional en Conservación y Manejo de Vida Silvestre, Universidad Nacional, Apdo. 1350, Heredia, Costa Rica. E-mail: [email protected] B Department of Environmental Conservation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 1 Corresponding author Abstract We describe the manner in which a nine-banded armadillo (Dasypus novemcinctus) killed a Cen- tral American coral snake (Micrurus nigrocinctus) that it subsequently ate. The armadillo repeatedly ran towards, jumped, flipped over in mid-air, and landed on top of the snake with its back until the snake was dead. Keywords: armadillo, behavior, food, predation, snake Depredación de una serpiente de coral de América Central (Micrurus nigrocinctus) por un armadillo de nueve bandas (Dasypus novemcinctus) en el Parque Nacional Santa Rosa, Costa Rica Resumen En esta nota describimos la manera en que un armadillo de nueve bandas (Dasypus novemcinc- tus) mató a una serpiente de coral de América Central (Micrurus nigrocinctus) que posteriormente comió. El armadillo corrió varias veces hacia adelante, saltó, se dio vuelta en el aire y aterrizó sobre la serpiente con la espalda hasta que la serpiente estuvo muerta. Palabras clave: armadillo, comida, comportamiento, depredación, serpiente Nine-banded armadillos (Dasypus novemcinc- The ~4-kg nine-banded armadillo is distributed tus) feed mostly on arthropods such as beetles, ter- from the southeast and central United States to Uru- mites, and ants, but also consume bird eggs and guay and northern Argentina, Granada, Trinidad “unusual items” such as fruits, fungi, and small verte- and Tobago, and the Margarita Islands (Loughry brates (McBee & Baker, 1982; Wetzel, 1991; Carrillo et al., 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents List of Figures
    SANDHILL LAKES MITIGATION BANK (FITZHUGH CARTER TRACT) OF ECONFINA CREEK WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AREA ANNUAL REPORT 2009-2010 Prepared by Justin Davis, Wildlife Biologist Division of Habitat and Species Conservation Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................................4 LIST OF TABLES .........................................................................................................8 LIST OF APPENDICES ................................................................................................9 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................11 HABITAT ....................................................................................................................11 Ecological and Land Cover Classification .............................................................11 Water Levels ..........................................................................................................12 Photo Plots .............................................................................................................13 FISH AND WILDLIFE POPULATIONS ...................................................................14 Freshwater Fish ..........................................................................................................15 Fish Population Assessment ..................................................................................15
    [Show full text]