DOCSLIB.ORG

Observation and Integrated Earth-System

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Observation and Integrated Earth-System Observation and integrated Earth-system science: A roadmap for 2016–2025 Adrian Simmons, Jean-Louis Fellous, Venkatachalam Ramaswamy, Kevin Trenberth, Ghassem Asrar, Magdalena Balmaseda, John P. Burrows, Philippe Ciais, Mark Drinkwater, Pierre Friedlingstein, et al. To cite this version: Adrian Simmons, Jean-Louis Fellous, Venkatachalam Ramaswamy, Kevin Trenberth, Ghassem Asrar, et al.. Observation and integrated Earth-system science: A roadmap for 2016–2025. Advances in Space Research, Elsevier, 2016, 57 (10), pp.2037 - 2103. 10.1016/j.asr.2016.03.008. hal-01491811 HAL Id: hal-01491811 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01491811 Submitted on 28 Jun 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Observation and Integrated Earth‐system Science: A roadmap for 2016‐2025 Adrian Simmons1 European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts, Shinfield Park, Reading RG2 9AX, UK Jean‐Louis Fellous Committee on Space Research, c/o CNES, 2 place Maurice Quentin, 75039 Paris Cedex 01, France Venkatachalam Ramaswamy Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory/NOAA, Princeton, NJ 08540‐6649, USA Kevin Trenberth National Center for Atmospheric Research, P.O. Box 3000, Boulder, CO 80307, USA and fellow contributors from a Study Team of the Committee on Space Research: Ghassem Asrar (Univ. of Maryland), Magdalena Balmaseda (ECMWF), John P. Burrows (Univ. of Bremen), Philippe Ciais (IPSL/LSCE), Mark Drinkwater (ESA/ESTEC), Pierre Friedlingstein (Univ. of Exeter), Nadine Gobron (EC/JRC), Eric Guilyardi (IPSL/LOCEAN), David Halpern (NASA/JPL), Martin Heimann (MPI for Biogeochemistry), Johnny Johannessen (NERSC), Pieternel F. Levelt (KNMI and Univ. of Technology Delft), Ernesto Lopez‐Baeza (Univ. of Valencia), Joyce Penner (Univ. of Michigan), Robert Scholes (Univ. of the Witwatersrand) and Ted Shepherd (Univ. of Reading). Abstract This report is the response to a request by the Committee on Space Research of the International Council for Science to prepare a roadmap on observation and integrated Earth‐system science for the coming ten years. Its focus is on the combined use of observations and modelling to address the functioning, predictability and projected evolution of interacting components of the Earth system on timescales out to a century or so. It discusses how observations support integrated Earth‐system science and its applications, and identifies planned enhancements to the contributing observing systems and other requirements for observations and their processing. All types of observation are considered, but emphasis is placed on those made from space. The origins and development of the integrated view of the Earth system are outlined, noting the interactions between the main components that lead to requirements for integrated science and modelling, and for the observations that guide and support them. What constitutes an Earth‐system model is discussed. Summaries are given of key cycles within the Earth system. 1 Corresponding author; email: [email protected]; tel: +44 118 949 9700 Page 1 29 February 2016 The nature of Earth observation and the arrangements for international coordination essential for effective operation of global observing systems are introduced. Instances are given of present types of observation, what is already on the roadmap for 2016‐2025 and some of the issues to be faced. Observations that are organized on a systematic basis and observations that are made for process understanding and model development, or other research or demonstration purposes, are covered. Specific accounts are given for many of the variables of the Earth system. The current status and prospects for Earth‐system modelling are summarized. The evolution towards applying Earth‐system models for environmental monitoring and prediction as well as for climate simulation and projection is outlined. General aspects of the improvement of models, whether through refining the representations of processes that are already incorporated or through adding new processes or components, are discussed. Some important elements of Earth‐system models are considered more fully. Data assimilation is discussed not only because it uses observations and models to generate datasets for monitoring the Earth system and for initiating and evaluating predictions, in particular through reanalysis, but also because of the feedback it provides on the quality of both the observations and the models employed. Inverse methods for surface‐flux or model‐parameter estimation are also covered. Reviews are given of the way observations and the processed datasets based on them are used for evaluating models, and of the combined use of observations and models for monitoring and interpreting the behaviour of the Earth system and for predicting and projecting its future. A set of concluding discussions covers general developmental needs, requirements for continuity of space‐based observing systems, further long‐term requirements for observations and other data, technological advances and data challenges, and the importance of enhanced international co‐ operation. Page 2 29 February 2016 Contents 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 6 2 The Earth system .............................................................................................................. 8 2.1 Development of the Earth‐system view ....................................................................... 8 2.2 Scope of this study ................................................................................................... 11 2.3 The climate system................................................................................................... 11 2.4 Integrated Earth‐system modelling............................................................................ 12 2.5 Energy, circulation and constituent cycles within the Earth system.............................. 13 2.5.1 Energy and circulation....................................................................................... 13 2.5.2 The hydrological cycle ....................................................................................... 14 2.5.3 The carbon cycle ............................................................................................... 16 2.5.4 Other constituent cycles and the link between air quality and climate.................. 18 3 Earth‐system observation ............................................................................................... 19 3.1 The nature of Earth observation ................................................................................ 19 3.2 International coordination of Earth observation ......................................................... 20 3.3 Sustained satellite observing systems for weather and climate ................................... 23 3.4 The Copernicus programme ...................................................................................... 24 3.5 Missions for research and development, and the challenges of continuity ................... 25 3.6 Observation of specific components of the Earth system ............................................ 28 3.6.1 Atmosphere ..................................................................................................... 28 3.6.2 Ocean .............................................................................................................. 34 3.6.3 Land................................................................................................................. 39 3.6.4 Cryosphere ....................................................................................................... 43 3.6.5 Carbon cycle ..................................................................................................... 45 4 Earth‐system modelling .................................................................................................. 46 4.1 “Seamless” modelling and prediction ........................................................................ 46 4.2 Limitations of models ............................................................................................... 48 4.3 Improvement of models ........................................................................................... 49 4.4 Resolution ............................................................................................................... 51 4.5 Clouds and aerosols.................................................................................................. 53 4.6 Hydrological cycle .................................................................................................... 54 4.7 Atmospheric chemistry ............................................................................................. 56 4.8 Land biogeochemistry .............................................................................................. 57 4.8.1 Nitrogen cycle .................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Inna Polichtchouk
    Inna Polichtchouk - Curriculum Vitae Department of Meteorology University of Reading Reading, RG6 6BX (+44) 7722 150588 [email protected] http://www.met.reading.ac.uk/∼sn907943/home/inna.php EMPLOYMENT European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, UK Nov 2016 { Present Visiting Scientist, Earth System Modelling Section Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, UK Aug 2014 { Present Post Doctoral Research Associate Principal Investigator: Ted Shepherd EDUCATION Queen Mary, University of London, UK Oct 2010 { Dec 2014 PhD in Astrophysics, School of Physics and Astronomy. Thesis: Baroclinic Jets on \Other" Jupiters and Earths Advisor: James Y-K Cho Queen Mary, University of London, UK Sep 2006 { Jun 2010 MSci in Mathematics with Statistics, School of Mathematical Sciences { 1st class. Thesis: Baroclinic Instability on Hot Extrasolar Giant Planets Advisor: James Y-K Cho PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Met Office, Exeter, UK Jun 2009 { Aug 2009 Internship in Data Assimilation Research Team. Role: Investigated generation of global background error covariance matrices via ensemble-driven methods for implementation in four dimensional variational data assimilation. Met Office, Exeter, UK Jun 2008 { Aug 2008 Internship in Health Team. Role: Analyzed the impact of Finnish weather on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients using statistical methods. 1 TEACHING AND SUPERVISION University of Reading, UK Oct 2017{Jan 2018 Joint principal investigator of Dr Nick Byrne, who works on the stratosphere-troposphere coupling in the IFS. Queen Mary, University of London, UK Oct 2010{Jun 2014 • Guest lecturer for the Extrasolar Planets and Astrophysical Disks module. • Teaching assistant for the following modules: Complex Variables, Calculus I & II, Introduction to Mathematical Computing, Differential Equations, Our Universe and Mathematical Techniques III.
    [Show full text]
  • Prep Publi Catio on Cop Py
    Attribution of Extreme Weather Events in the Context of Climate Change PREPUBLICATION COPY Committee on Extreme Weather Events and Climate Change Attribution Board on Atmospheric Sciencees and Climate Division on Earth and Life Studies This prepublication version of Attribution of Extreme Weather Events in the Context of Climate Change has been provided to the public to facilitate timely access to the report. Although the substance of the report is final, editorial changes may be made throughout the text and citations will be checked prior to publication. The final report will be available through the National Academies Press in spring 2016. Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Attribution of Extreme Weather Events in the Context of Climate Change THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS 500 Fifth Street, NW Washington, DC 20001 This study was supported by the David and Lucile Packard Foundation under contract number 2015- 63077, the Heising-Simons Foundation under contract number 2015-095, the Litterman Family Foundation, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration under contract number NNX15AW55G, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration under contract number EE- 133E-15-SE-1748, and the U.S. Department of Energy under contract number DE-SC0014256, with additional support from the National Academy of Sciences’ Arthur L. Day Fund. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of any organization or agency that provided support for the project. International Standard Book Number-13: International Standard Book Number-10: Digital Object Identifier: 10.17226/21852 Additional copies of this report are available for sale from the National Academies Press, 500 Fifth Street, NW, Keck 360, Washington, DC 20001; (800) 624-6242 or (202) 334-3313; http://www.nap.edu.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 7: Clouds and Aerosols
    Second Order Draft Chapter 7 IPCC WGI Fifth Assessment Report 1 2 Chapter 7: Clouds and Aerosols 3 4 Coordinating Lead Authors: Olivier Boucher (France), David Randall (USA) 5 6 Lead Authors: Paulo Artaxo (Brazil), Christopher Bretherton (USA), Graham Feingold (USA), Piers 7 Forster (UK), Veli-Matti Kerminen (Finland), Yutaka Kondo (Japan), Hong Liao (China), Ulrike Lohmann 8 (Switzerland), Philip Rasch (USA), S. K. Satheesh (India), Steven Sherwood (Australia), Bjorn Stevens 9 (Germany), Xiao-Ye Zhang (China) 10 11 Contributing Authors: Govindswamy Bala (India), Nicolas Bellouin (UK), Angela Benedetti (UK), 12 Sandrine Bony (France), Ken Caldeira (USA), Antony Del Genio (USA), Maria Cristina Facchini (Italy), 13 Mark Flanner (USA), Steven Ghan (USA), Claire Granier (France), Corinna Hoose (Germany), Andy Jones 14 (UK), Makoto Koike (Japan), Ben Kravitz (USA), Ben Laken (Spain), Matthew Lebsock (USA), Natalie 15 Mahowald (USA), Gunnar Myhre (Norway), Colin O'Dowd (Ireland), Alan Robock (USA), Bjørn Samset 16 (Norway), Hauke Schmidt (Germany), Michael Schulz (Norway), Graeme Stephens (USA), Trude 17 Storelvmo (USA), Dave Winker (USA), Matthew Wyant (USA) 18 19 Review Editors: Sandro Fuzzi (Italy), Joyce Penner (USA), Venkatachalam Ramaswamy (USA), Claudia 20 Stubenrauch (France) 21 22 Date of Draft: 5 October 2012 23 24 Notes: TSU Compiled Version 25 26 27 Table of Contents 28 29 Executive Summary..........................................................................................................................................3 30
    [Show full text]
  • NOAA-DOE PRECIPITATION PROCESSES and PREDICTABILITY WORKSHOP REPORT
    NOAA-DOE PRECIPITATION PROCESSES AND PREDICTABILITY WORKSHOP REPORT Published July 2021 DOE/SC-0206 | NOAA Technical Report OAR CPO-9 Recommended Citation: Balmaseda M, A Barros, S Hagos, B Kirtman, H-Y Ma, Y Ming, A Pendergrass, V Tallapragada, E Thompson. 2020. “NOAA-DOE Precipitation Processes and Predictability Workshop.” U.S. Department of Energy and U.S. Department of Commerce NOAA; DOE/SC-0203; NOAA Technical Report OAR CPO-9. July 2021 NOAA-DOE Precipitation Processes and Predictability Workshop November 30 – December 2, 2020 (Virtual) Published July 2021 Convened by U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research Climate Program Office The Earth Systems Science and Modeling Division U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Office of Biological and Environmental Research Earth and Environmental Systems Sciences Division In partnership with U.S. Global Change Research Program U.S. Climate Variability and Predictability Science Committee and Report Authors: Magdalena Balmaseda (ECMWF), Ana Barros (Duke University), Samson Hagos (DOE/PNNL), Ben Kirtman (U. Miami), His-Yen Ma (DOE/LLNL), Yi Ming (NOAA/GFDL), Angie Pendergrass (Cornell University; NCAR), Vijay Tallapragada (NOAA/NWS), Elizabeth Thompson (NOAA/PSL) Program Organizing Committee: Jin Huang (NOAA/CPO), Renu Joseph (DOE/EESSD), Sandy Lucas (NOAA/CPO), Sally McFarlane (DOE/EESSD), Mike Patterson (US CLIVAR), Yan Xue (NOAA/NWS) Editor and Facilitator: Victoria Breeze (NOAA/CPO) Rapporteurs: John Coggins (NOAA/CPO); Zhe Feng (DOE/PNNL); Bryce Harrop (DOE/PNNL); Huaping Huang (DOE/LBL); Ali Stevens (NOAA/CPO); Die Wang (DOE/BNL) Facilitator: LuAnn Dahlman (NOAA/CPO) i NOAA-DOE PRECIPITATION PROCESSES AND PREDICTABILITY WORKSHOP ii July 2021 Executive Summary Our ability to predict when, where, and how much 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Observation and Integrated Earth-System Science: a Roadmap for 2016€“2025
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Advances in Space Research xxx (2016) xxx–xxx www.elsevier.com/locate/asr Review Observation and integrated Earth-system science: A roadmap for 2016–2025 Adrian Simmons a,⇑, Jean-Louis Fellous b, Venkatachalam Ramaswamy c, Kevin Trenberth d, and fellow contributors from a Study Team of the Committee on Space Research: Ghassem Asrar (Univ. of Maryland), Magdalena Balmaseda (ECMWF), John P. Burrows (Univ. of Bremen), Philippe Ciais (IPSL/LSCE) Mark Drinkwater (ESA/ESTEC), Pierre Friedlingstein (Univ. of Exeter), Nadine Gobron (EC/JRC), Eric Guilyardi (IPSL/LOCEAN), David Halpern (NASA/JPL), Martin Heimann (MPI for Biogeochemistry), Johnny Johannessen (NERSC), Pieternel F. Levelt (KNMI and Univ. of Technology Delft), Ernesto Lopez-Baeza (Univ. of Valencia), Joyce Penner (Univ. of Michigan), Robert Scholes (Univ. of the Witwatersrand), Ted Shepherd (Univ. of Reading) a European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, Shinfield Park, Reading RG2 9AX, UK b Committee on Space Research, 2 Place Maurice Quentin, 75039 Paris Cedex 01, France c Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory/NOAA, Princeton, NJ 08540-6649, USA d National Center for Atmospheric Research, P.O. Box 3000, Boulder, CO 80307, USA Received 12 December 2015; received in revised form 29 February 2016; accepted 4 March 2016 Abstract This report is the response to a request by the Committee on Space Research of the International Council for Science to prepare a roadmap on observation and integrated Earth-system science for the coming ten years. Its focus is on the combined use of observations and modelling to address the functioning, predictability and projected evolution of interacting components of the Earth system on time- scales out to a century or so.
    [Show full text]
  • Science & Technology Trends 2020-2040
    Science & Technology Trends 2020-2040 Exploring the S&T Edge NATO Science & Technology Organization DISCLAIMER The research and analysis underlying this report and its conclusions were conducted by the NATO S&T Organization (STO) drawing upon the support of the Alliance’s defence S&T community, NATO Allied Command Transformation (ACT) and the NATO Communications and Information Agency (NCIA). This report does not represent the official opinion or position of NATO or individual governments, but provides considered advice to NATO and Nations’ leadership on significant S&T issues. D.F. Reding J. Eaton NATO Science & Technology Organization Office of the Chief Scientist NATO Headquarters B-1110 Brussels Belgium http:\www.sto.nato.int Distributed free of charge for informational purposes; hard copies may be obtained on request, subject to availability from the NATO Office of the Chief Scientist. The sale and reproduction of this report for commercial purposes is prohibited. Extracts may be used for bona fide educational and informational purposes subject to attribution to the NATO S&T Organization. Unless otherwise credited all non-original graphics are used under Creative Commons licensing (for original sources see https://commons.wikimedia.org and https://www.pxfuel.com/). All icon-based graphics are derived from Microsoft® Office and are used royalty-free. Copyright © NATO Science & Technology Organization, 2020 First published, March 2020 Foreword As the world Science & Tech- changes, so does nology Trends: our Alliance. 2020-2040 pro- NATO adapts. vides an assess- We continue to ment of the im- work together as pact of S&T ad- a community of vances over the like-minded na- next 20 years tions, seeking to on the Alliance.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013-10-21 WCRP Cryo GC Report
    Workshop Report Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 INTRODUCTION 3 SETTING THE COURSE FOR ADDRESSING THE WCRP CRYOSPHERE IN A CHANGING CLIMATE GRAND CHALLENGE 3 CRYOSPHERE IN A CHANGING CLIMATE GRAND CHALLENGE IMPERATIVES 4 SCIENCE FOCI TO BE ADDRESSED AT THIS WORKSHOP 4 KEYNOTE PRESENTATIONS 5 WCRP GRAND CHALLENGES AND THE CRYOSPHERE IN A CHANGING CLIMATE 5 POLAR CLIMATE PREDICTABILITY INITIATIVE 5 ICE SHEETS AND GLACIERS IN A CHANGING CLIMATE 6 SEA ICE IN A CHANGING CLIMATE 7 PERMAFROST AND CARBON IN A CHANGING CLIMATE 8 CRYOSPHERE BIASES / SHORTCOMINGS IN EARTH SYSTEM MODELS 9 INTERDISCIPLINARY BREAKOUT GROUPS 10 FROSTBYTES & POSTER SESSION 14 SCIENTIFIC FOCI BREAKOUT GROUPS 14 PERMAFROST 15 WHAT IS THE CURRENT STATE OF THE PERMAFROST CARBON RESERVOIR AND GREENHOUSE GAS BALANCE OF THE CIRCUMPOLAR REGION? 15 WHAT IS THE MAGNITUDE, TIMING AND FORM OF GREENHOUSE GAS RELEASE TO THE ATMOSPHERE IN A WARMING WORLD? 15 GLACIOLOGY 17 CURRENT AND FUTURE MELT OF GLOBAL GLACIERS AND ICE CAPS 17 FRESHWATER VOLUME AND AVAILABILITY FROM THE CRYOSPHERE 17 ICE SHEET SNOWPACK MELT, STORAGE & RUNOFF 18 SEA ICE 19 IMPACT OF CHANGING SEA ICE ON HIGH-LATITUDE CLIMATE SYSTEMS 19 INTERNAL VARIABILITY OF SEA ICE UP TO MULTI-DECADAL TIME SCALE 21 ROLE OF SNOW IN THE EARTH AND CLIMATE SYSTEMS 22 HOW CAN WE IMPROVE OUR CURRENT KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING OF THE TEMPORAL DYNAMICS AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SNOW AS A COMPONENT OF THE COUPLED CLIMATE SYSTEM? 22 CAN WE IMPROVE OUR UNDERSTANDING OF THE ROLE OF SNOW AS AN ACTIVE COMPONENT OF THE GLOBAL CLIMATE SYSTEM? 23 HOW WILL FUTURE CHANGES IN SNOW COVER AFFECT FRESHWATER AVAILABILITY FOR HUMAN SOCIETIES? 24 WORKSHOP CONCLUSION 24 APPENDIX 1: AGENDA 25 APPENDIX 2: PARTICIPANT LIST 27 APPENDIX 3: ONLINE PARTICIPANT LIST AND SOCIAL MEDIA 28 APPENDIX 4: ACRONYM LIST 29 2 Executive Summary A workshop was convened to further develop the strategy to address the WCRP Cryosphere in a Changing Climate Grand Challenge.
    [Show full text]
  • WORKING GROUP I CONTRIBUTION to the IPCC FIFTH ASSESSMENT REPORT CLIMATE CHANGE 2013: the PHYSICAL SCIENCE BASIS Final Draft
    WORKING GROUP I CONTRIBUTION TO THE IPCC FIFTH ASSESSMENT REPORT CLIMATE CHANGE 2013: THE PHYSICAL SCIENCE BASIS Final Draft Underlying Scientific-Technical Assessment A report accepted by Working Group I of the IPCC but not approved in detail. Note: The final draft Report, dated 7 June 2013, of the Working Group I contribution to the IPCC 5th Assessment Report "Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis" was accepted but not approved in detail by the 12th Session of Working Group I and the 36th Session of the IPCC on 26 September 2013 in Stockholm, Sweden. It consists of the full scientific and technical assessment undertaken by Working Group I. The Report has to be read in conjunction with the document entitled “Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Working Group I Contribution to the IPCC 5th Assessment Report - Changes to the underlying Scientific/Technical Assessment” to ensure consistency with the approved Summary for Policymakers (IPCC-XXVI/Doc.4) and presented to the Panel at its 36th Session. This document lists the changes necessary to ensure consistency between the full Report and the Summary for Policymakers, which was approved line-by-line by Working Group I and accepted by the Panel at the above- mentioned Sessions. Before publication the Report will undergo final copyediting as well as any error correction as necessary, consistent with the IPCC Protocol for Addressing Possible Errors. Publication of the Report is foreseen in January 2014. Disclaimer: The designations employed and the presentation of material on maps do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Tracing the Second Stage of Ozone Recovery in the Antarctic Ozone-Hole with a “Big Data” Approach to Multivariate Regressions
    Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 79–97, 2015 www.atmos-chem-phys.net/15/79/2015/ doi:10.5194/acp-15-79-2015 © Author(s) 2015. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Tracing the second stage of ozone recovery in the Antarctic ozone-hole with a “big data” approach to multivariate regressions A. T. J. de Laat, R. J. van der A, and M. van Weele Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute, De Bilt, the Netherlands Correspondence to: A. T. J. de Laat ([email protected]) Received: 28 May 2014 – Published in Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss.: 14 July 2014 Revised: 20 November 2014 – Accepted: 25 November 2014 – Published: 8 January 2015 Abstract. This study presents a sensitivity analysis of mul- results will move towards more confidence in recovery with tivariate regressions of recent springtime Antarctic vortex increasing record length, uncertainties in choices currently ozone trends using a “big data” ensemble approach. do not yet support formal identification of recovery of the Our results indicate that the poleward heat flux (Eliassen– Antarctic ozone hole. Palm flux) and the effective chlorine loading respectively ex- plain most of the short-term and long-term variability in dif- ferent Antarctic springtime total ozone records. The inclu- sion in the regression of stratospheric volcanic aerosols, so- 1 Introduction lar variability and the quasi-biennial oscillation is shown to increase rather than decrease the overall uncertainty in the at- An important question in 21st century ozone research is tribution of Antarctic springtime ozone because of large un- whether the ozone layer is starting to recover as a result of certainties in their respective records.
    [Show full text]
  • A Roadmap for 2016–2025
    Observation and integrated Earth-system science: a roadmap for 2016–2025 Article Accepted Version Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 Simmons, A., Fellous, J.-L., Ramaswamy, V., Trenberth, K., Asrar, G., Balmaseda, M., Burrows, J. P., Ciais, P., Drinkwater, M., Friedlingstein, P., Gobron, N., Guilyardi, E., Halpern, D., Heimann, M., Johannessen, J., Levelt, P. F., Lopez-Baeza, E., Penner, J., Scholes, R. and Shepherd, T. (2016) Observation and integrated Earth-system science: a roadmap for 2016–2025. Advances in Space Research, 57 (10). pp. 2037-2103. ISSN 0273-1177 doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2016.03.008 Available at http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/65846/ It is advisable to refer to the publisher’s version if you intend to cite from the work. See Guidance on citing . To link to this article DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2016.03.008 Publisher: Elsevier All outputs in CentAUR are protected by Intellectual Property Rights law, including copyright law. Copyright and IPR is retained by the creators or other copyright holders. Terms and conditions for use of this material are defined in the End User Agreement . www.reading.ac.uk/centaur CentAUR Central Archive at the University of Reading Reading’s research outputs online Observation and Integrated Earth‐system Science: A Roadmap for 2016‐2025 Observation and Integrated Earth‐system Science: A roadmap for 2016‐2025 Adrian Simmons1 European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts, Shinfield Park, Reading RG2 9AX, UK Jean‐Louis Fellous Committee on Space Research, c/o CNES, 2 place Maurice Quentin, 75039 Paris Cedex 01, France Venkatachalam Ramaswamy Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory/NOAA, Princeton, NJ 08540‐6649, USA Kevin Trenberth National Center for Atmospheric Research, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Yale Environmental News / 17:1 Yale Environmental News / 17:1 3 Conferences, Yale Climate & Seminars, Symposia Energy Institute News
    yale environmental n e w s Yale Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies and Yale Institute for Biospheric Studies fall 2011 · vol. 17, no. 1 Shedding Light on Ancient Marine Life page 16 from the director faculty news “On July 1 of this year, I was given the honor Expert in Energy and Transportation Joins Tenure-Track Faculty of becoming Director of the Yale Institute for at the School of Forestry & Environmental Studies Biospheric Studies.” An expert in energy research delves into the effects of different poli- research on the economics and policy of and transportation cies on reducing greenhouse gas emissions solar energy technologies in that country. He goal of developing and testing new compu- that advanced stage doctoral students can has joined the tenure- from transportation.“We’re very pleased to have holds a PhD from Stanford University, and Michael Marsland, Yale University Michael Marsland, Yale tational platforms to assist in the analysis of have the opportunity to spend a year focused track faculty at the Ken join us,” said Dean Peter Crane. “He’s done taught “Economics of the Environment,” a complex systems. Many of the insights and on enhancing the scientific quality of their Yale School of Forestry important work on how consumers respond foundations course with an enrollment of tools that emerged from this activity have now dissertations through the exploration of their & Environmental to changing gasoline prices, which has critical approximately 100 students during the fall been embedded as core parts of research into innovative discoveries. I have asked anthropol- Studies (F&ES).
    [Show full text]
  • 12Th Session of WCRP/SPARC
    INTERNATIONAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL WORLD COUNCIL FOR OCEANOGRAPHIC METEOROLOGICAL SCIENCE COMMISSION ORGANIZATION WORLD CLIMATE RESEARCH PROGRAMME STRATOSPHERIC PROCESSES AND THEIR ROLE IN CLIMATE (SPARC) REPORT OF THE TWELFTH SESSION OF THE SCIENTIFIC STEERING GROUP (Dunsmuir Lodge, Sydney, British Columbia, Canada, 9-12 August 2004) TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. 1. Introduction......................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Opening of the session, introductory comments ......................................................... 3 1.2 WCRP Comments ....................................................................................................... 3 2. Review of the main events since the last SSG................................................................... 4 3. The new SPARC International Project Office (SPARC IPO) .............................................. 4 4. Presentations from the Canadian Climate Research Community ...................................... 5 5. The SPARC Themes .......................................................................................................... 6 5.1. Detection, Attribution, Prediction ................................................................................. 6 5.2. Stratospheric Chemistry and Climate.......................................................................... 8 5.3. Stratosphere/Troposphere Dynamical Coupling ....................................................... 10 6. Cross-Cutting and
    [Show full text]