DOCSLIB.ORG

CAG) Meeting #2 Summary Ashby + North Berkeley BART Zoning and Development Parameters

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CAG) Meeting #2 Summary Ashby + North Berkeley BART Zoning and Development Parameters Planning and Development Department Land Use Planning Division 1947 Center Street Berkeley CA 94704 Community Advisory Group (CAG) Meeting #2 Summary Ashby + North Berkeley BART Zoning and Development Parameters Date + Time: August 3, 2020 at 6 pm Location: Online via Zoom Webinar virtual meeting Agenda 1. Welcome and Introductions 2. CAG Roles and Responsibilities 3. Planning Process 4. Zoning/AB2923, Project Parameters and Community Goals 5. Preliminary Site Concepts 6. Next Steps 7. Public Comment Attendance There were 13 out of 15 Community Advisory Group (CAG) members in attendance as well as over 70 members from the public. The following members of the project team (City, BART and consultants) made presentations or helped answer questions during the meeting: City ● Alisa Shen - Principal Planner BART ● Abby Thorne-Lyman - Transit-Oriented Design (TOD) Director ● Rachel Factor – Principal Planner Consultants ● Karen Murray - Van Meter Williams Pollack (VMWP) ● Dave Javid - Plan to Place ● Laurence Lewis - Kittleson & Associates Ashby + North Berkeley BART Zoning and Development Parameters | CAG #2 Summary 1 Planning and Development Department Land Use Planning Division 1947 Center Street Berkeley CA 94704 Meeting Summary The purpose of the second CAG meeting was to clarify the roles, responsibilities, and process for the advisory group, share and gather input on project goals and development parameters for each site, illustrate and understand AB2923 requirements for zoning as applied to each station site, and discuss big-picture physical design ideas for each site. The following notes summarize the main agenda items, presentation and discussion. CAG Introduction, Purpose, Roles and Responsibilities Following up on the discussion at the first CAG meeting, the project team provided a brief overview of the CAG roles and responsibilities. Below are the key themes from the CAG discussion that followed: ● Incorporate equity, which has been previously missing in planning decisions, in this process ● Present hard numbers in addition to percentages to better acknowledge public comprehension of the subject ● Acknowledge the context within Berkeley including the roots of the housing crisis and redlining ● Facilitated CAG conversations and discussions will lead to a better outcome and recommendation to the Planning Commission. Get CAG more involved. ● Provide an overview and objectives for the Community Workshop ● Share documents and meeting materials well in advance of the CAG meetings ● Acknowledge that BART ridership is the number one priority for BART’s role in this process Planning Process Alisa Shen provided an overview of the project objectives and timeline of outreach activities (visit the project website for more information: https://www.cityofberkeley.info/bartplanning/). Laurence Lewis, from Kittleson + Associates who are leading the transportation analysis, provided an overview of the transportation analysis parameters, expectations for future transit, and the implications it has on site concepts. The CAG had an opportunity to comment, and below are the key themes from the CAG discussion that followed: ● Consider the impact of COVID-19 in the analysis and interpretation of future transportation patterns. ● Study the surrounding circulation systems ● Rethink the necessity of cars and the implications of electric vehicles ● Share the analysis findings, including any historical data ● Consider the mobility challenges for the disabled and plan accordingly Ashby + North Berkeley BART Zoning and Development Parameters | CAG #2 Summary 2 Planning and Development Department Land Use Planning Division 1947 Center Street Berkeley CA 94704 ● Share the expectation for Transit Oriented Development to increase ridership ● Consider affordability in transportation analysis Zoning/AB2923, Project Parameters, and Community Goals The project team provided a brief overview on zoning and AB2923, including the goals and objectives from existing planning efforts including Adeline Corridor Specific Plan Vision and North Berkeley Goals and Development Objectives. From the analysis of the related planning efforts, the project team provided a summary of the “knowns” and “unknowns” related the project goals for each station, in the following categories: Housing, Community Uses/Amenities, Building Form/Character, Station Access and Transportation, Public Spaces, and Sustainability. The CAG participated in a live poll to share their top three priorities, which resulted in following: Housing (85%), Station Access and Transportation (65%), and Uses and Community Amenities (40%) (for complete poll results, please refer to the Appendix). Below is a summary of the key themes that came out of the CAG conversation about this topic ● Consider whether Equity and Inclusion should be called out as a stand-alone project Goal or be integrated/highlighted within the other goals ● Determine if Sustainability should be pulled out as a stand-alone Goal or an underlying theme among all Goals ● Review the feasibility of affordable housing at a range of levels and the inherent affordable housing in surrounding areas ● Encourage diversity of developers in the RFP process and break down parcels to allow for multiple projects ● Present studies on the relationship between sustainability and equity on ridership ● Ensure a reduction in accidents on bike/pedestrian pathways Preliminary Site Concepts The project team introduced preliminary site concepts for each station with an overview of considerations and a range of elements that make up each concept including: Economic Conditions, Funding + Resources, Technology (buildings + mobility), Laws + Regulations, and Policy. Ashby BART Three preliminary concepts were presented for the Ashby BART station: Option A “Minimal Change” (split into two options: Option A1+A2), Option B “Road Diet/Flea Market”, and Option C “Central Plaza/Flea Market”. Ashby + North Berkeley BART Zoning and Development Parameters | CAG #2 Summary 3 Planning and Development Department Land Use Planning Division 1947 Center Street Berkeley CA 94704 After the presentation the CAG participated in the following live poll. The first question asked if the Ashby concepts encompassed the priorities from the “Community Goals” section, the following is the results: 46% were Neutral, 31% Agreed, 15% Strongly Agreed, and 8% Strongly Disagreed. The second question asked which proposed circulation pattern best serves the community, the station, and the open space/flea market: 38% preferred Option C, 31% Option B, and 15% for Option A. The last question asked about the balance of housing and the flea market in the following priorities: Maximize site area for housing (46%), Equally balance flea market and housing (38%), and lastly, Maximize area for flea market (15%). For complete poll results, please refer to the Appendix. Ashby BART Station Preliminary Concepts - snapshot of notes recorded on the virtual whiteboard A summary of the key themes that came out of the CAG conversation that followed the poll are included below: ● Option A1: o Consider a community recreation center on this site, regional sports center, supportive housing ● Option A2: o Desire for buildings to address Adeline directly, and not be set back so far and down low where the parking lot Ashby + North Berkeley BART Zoning and Development Parameters | CAG #2 Summary 4 Planning and Development Department Land Use Planning Division 1947 Center Street Berkeley CA 94704 ● Option B o Reduce lanes on Adeline, road diet has potential o Reconsider substation access, drop-off zones, and sidewalk width for better circulation and opportunity for a better use of the area o Explain how parking will work for residents and BART patrons in the next round o Review the community’s initial input into the option from previous efforts ● Option C o Review Adeline’s circulation, in particular the number of lanes o Consider overhead tunnel decking for the substation, even if it is more expensive o Like the potential for community amenities ● General Comments o When preparing the RFP, consider who is included in the process and who isn’t, whether intentional or not, and how much we ask of them o Consider which of these concepts would be most suitable for various community goals, such as accessibility, affordable housing, the ability to partner with neighborhood partners for development o The flea market and housing should not be looked at in opposition o Following up on an earlier point, provide documents for CAG review well in advance of the meetings so CAG can take them out to community members o Consider how the CAG and City might weigh input depending on the participants interest and location relative to either station o Discuss the financial tradeoffs and benefits of balancing affordability concerns at both stations o Expand the maps to show the context and circulation flow in the surrounding areas o Consider pushing the envelope with the concepts. There’s only one shot to get this right. o Consider how we can encourage community benefits now, not in 5-10 years when the project is complete o Emphasize the power and impact of good design North Berkeley BART Two preliminary site concepts were presented for the North Berkeley station: Option A “Maintain Street Grid” and Option B “Minimal Streets”. After the presentation, the CAG participated in a similar live poll about the North Berkeley BART station concept. Ashby + North Berkeley BART Zoning and Development Parameters | CAG #2 Summary 5 Planning and Development Department
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dipartimento Di Impresa E Management Cattedra Di Strategia
    Dipartimento di Impresa e Management Cattedra di Strategia di Impresa CORPORATE VENTURE CAPITAL ED OPEN INNOVATION: MOTORI PER LA CRESCITA INNOVATIVA AZIENDALE RELATORE Prof. Paolo Boccardelli CANDIDATO Carlo Maria Torregrossa Matricola 681361 CORRELATORE Prof. Luca Pirolo ANNO ACCADEMICO 2017/2018 INDICE INTRODUZIONE ............................................................................................................................. 3 CAPITOLO 1 – CORPORATE VENTURE CAPITAL ................................................................ 4 1.1 - Definizione, numeri e classificazione ...................................................................................... 4 1.2 - Principali tipologie di investimento ......................................................................................... 9 1.3 - Modelli e fasi di corporate venture capital ............................................................................ 11 1.4 - Il concetto di open innovation ............................................................................................... 14 CAPITOLO 2 – L’INVESTIMENTO IN INNOVAZIONE ........................................................ 23 2.1 - Start-up e corporate venturing ............................................................................................... 23 2.2 - Il fenomeno delle start-up nel mondo e in Italia .................................................................... 25 2.3 - Valutazione d’azienda: come valutare grandi imprese e start-up .........................................
    [Show full text]
  • ACT BART S Ites by Region.Csv TB1 TB6 TB4 TB2 TB3 TB5 TB7
    Services Transit Outreach Materials Distribution Light Rail Station Maintenance and Inspection Photography—Capture Metadata and GPS Marketing Follow-Up Programs Service Locations Dallas, Los Angeles, Minneapolis/Saint Paul San Francisco/Oakland Bay Area Our Customer Service Pledge Our pledge is to organize and act with precision to provide you with excellent customer service. We will do all this with all the joy that comes with the morning sun! “I slept and dreamed that life was joy. I awoke and saw that life was service. I acted and behold, service was joy. “Tagore Email: [email protected] Website: URBANMARKETINGCHANNELS.COM Urban Marketing Channel’s services to businesses and organizations in Atlanta, Dallas, San Francisco, Oakland and the Twin Cities metro areas since 1981 have allowed us to develop a specialty client base providing marketing outreach with a focus on transit systems. Some examples of our services include: • Neighborhood demographic analysis • Tailored response and mailing lists • Community event monitoring • Transit site management of information display cases and kiosks • Transit center rider alerts • Community notification of construction and route changes • On-Site Surveys • Enhance photo and list data with geocoding • Photographic services Visit our website (www.urbanmarketingchannels.com) Contact us at [email protected] 612-239-5391 Bay Area Transit Sites (includes BART and AC Transit.) Prepared by Urban Marketing Channels ACT BART S ites by Region.csv TB1 TB6 TB4 TB2 TB3 TB5 TB7 UnSANtit
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Station Profiles
    2015 BART Station Profile Study Station Profiles – Non-Home Origins STATION PROFILES – NON-HOME ORIGINS This section contains a summary sheet for selected BART stations, based on data from customers who travel to the station from non-home origins, like work, school, etc. The selected stations listed below have a sample size of at least 200 non-home origin trips: • 12th St. / Oakland City Center • Glen Park • 16th St. Mission • Hayward • 19th St. / Oakland • Lake Merritt • 24th St. Mission • MacArthur • Ashby • Millbrae • Balboa Park • Montgomery St. • Civic Center / UN Plaza • North Berkeley • Coliseum • Oakland International Airport (OAK) • Concord • Powell St. • Daly City • Rockridge • Downtown Berkeley • San Bruno • Dublin / Pleasanton • San Francisco International Airport (SFO) • Embarcadero • San Leandro • Fremont • Walnut Creek • Fruitvale • West Dublin / Pleasanton Maps for these stations are contained in separate PDF files at www.bart.gov/stationprofile. The maps depict non-home origin points of customers who use each station, and the points are color coded by mode of access. The points are weighted to reflect average weekday ridership at the station. For example, an origin point with a weight of seven will appear on the map as seven points, scattered around the actual point of origin. Note that the number of trips may appear underrepresented in cases where multiple trips originate at the same location. The following summary sheets contain basic information about each station’s weekday non-home origin trips, such as: • absolute number of entries and estimated non-home origin entries • access mode share • trip origin types • customer demographics. Additionally, the total number of car and bicycle parking spaces at each station are included for context.
    [Show full text]
  • Ashby Station a M E BUCHANAN ST Y T a P K E U R S
    C A R L S O N B LV D EL CERRITO KENSINGTON KENYON AVE PURDUE AVE 72 RICHMOND ST T 580 A Sunset View R S I H N Environmental 71 I Little Farm B Cemetery T 72M U Y Education Center Comm. Ctr. R A Y V E & Library A 67 V BELOIT AVE C Inspiration Point 80 El Cerrito Plaza BART E 72R E N T R A Tilden 800 71 72 72M 79 G 67 WI L DC L A Regional T P C A Y R Park K BART N L AV E G R D R A 67 R D R N T I Merry-Go-Round C E Z FAIRMOUNT AVE Z L Y P 72 79 E A KEY ROUTE BLVD K 7 B L P I E R C E S T 72M G V A D C R O 72R L Lake Anza L I U N S A G S A T P V R 800 E O 65 N U SAN PABLO AVE C 65 Brazilian Room A E V S E T Sr. Ctr. E S O L A N O AV E 18 79 U ASTA RD G C L H Transit 7 I S ALBANY 18 D Tilden Park E Golf Course Information YMCA AV S U A I N V Eastshore M A R T E City Hall Library T State Park E R E C 65 Clubhouse V 67 A G S R I Z Z LY P Ashby Station A M E BUCHANAN ST Y 79 T A P K E U R S B O H L O N E AV E G E H E N RY S T D Library L T R N V 65 D Berkeley O Rec.
    [Show full text]
  • Smart Practices in Public Private Partnerships for Affordable Housing Development at Berkeley BART Stations
    Smart Practices in Public Private Partnerships for Affordable Housing Development at Berkeley BART Stations Matthew Ebert Goldman School of Public Policy University of California, Berkeley 14 May 2021 The author conducted this study as part of the program of professional education at the Goldman School of Public Policy, University of California at Berkeley. This paper is submitted in partial fulfillment of the course requirements for the Master of Public Policy degree. The judgements and conclusions are solely those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by the Goldman School of Public Policy, by the University of California, or by any other agency. Table of Contents Executive Summary ...…………………………………………………….……………………. 3 I. Introduction …………………………………………………………….……………………. 4 II. Public Private Partnerships Definition …………………………………………………… 4 III. Background ………………………………………………………………………………… 5 A. Federal Housing Programs ………………………………………………………… 5 B. California Regulatory Environment …………………………….………………… 7 IV. PPP “Smart” Practices – Affordable Housing Finance …………………………………. 9 A. Affordable Housing Finance Basics ……………………………………………….. 9 B. Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) Program …………………………… 10 C. Criticisms of LIHTC ………………………………………………………………. 11 D Philanthropy in Affordable Housing Development …………………………….... 13 Philanthropy Basics ………………………………………………….……….. 14 Philanthropy Misunderstandings ……………………………………………. 14 Facebook - The Partnership for the Bay’s Future (PBF) ………...………… 15 PBF - Bay’s Future Fund …………………………………..………………… 15 PBF –
    [Show full text]
  • Bart at Twenty: Land Use and Development Impacts
    ffional Development BART@20: Land Use and Development Impacts Robert Cervero with research assistance by Carlos Castellanos, Wicaksono Sarosa, and Kenneth Rich July 1995 University of California at Berkeley - 1 BART@20: Land Use and Development Impacts Robert Cervero with Research Assistance by Carlos Castellanos, Wicaksono Sarosa, and Kenneth Rich This paper was produced with support provided by the U.S. Department of Transportation and the California State Department of Transportation (Caltrans) through the University of California Transportation Center. University of California at Berkeley Institute of Urban and Regional Development Table of Contents ONE: BART at 20: An Analysis of Land Use Impacts 1 1. INTRODUCTION 1 TWO: Research Approach and Data Sources 3 THREE: Employment and Population Changes in BART and Non-BART Areas 6 3.1. Population Changes 6 3.2. Employment Changes 3.3. Population Densities 15 3.4. Employment Densities 15 3.5. Summary 20 FOUR: Land Use Changes Over Time and by Corridor 21 4.1. General Land-Use Trends 23 4.2. Pre-BART versus Post-BART 25 4.3. Early versus Later BART 30 4.4. Trends in Non-Residential Densities 33 4.4. Summary 37 FIVE: Land-Use Changes by Station Classes 38 5.1. Grouping Variables 38 5.2. Classification 38 5.3. Station Classes 41 5.4. Trends in Residential and Non-Residential Growth Among Station Classes 44 5.5. Percent Growth in Early- versus Later-BART Years Among Station Classes 46 5.6. Trends in Non-Residential Densities Among Station Classes 46 SLX: Matched-Pair Comparisons of Land-Use Changes near BART Stations Versus Freeway Interchanges 51 6.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Automated Malware Analysis Report For
    ID: 446205 Sample Name: Open_Purchase_Order_Report_by_Supplier_- _ProReport_188165628308.xlsx Cookbook: default.jbs Time: 00:16:48 Date: 09/07/2021 Version: 32.0.0 Black Diamond Table of Contents Table of Contents 2 Windows Analysis Report Open_Purchase_Order_Report_by_Supplier_- _ProReport_188165628308.xlsx 3 Overview 3 General Information 3 Detection 3 Signatures 3 Classification 3 Process Tree 3 Malware Configuration 3 Yara Overview 3 Sigma Overview 3 Jbx Signature Overview 3 Mitre Att&ck Matrix 4 Behavior Graph 4 Screenshots 4 Thumbnails 4 Antivirus, Machine Learning and Genetic Malware Detection 5 Initial Sample 5 Dropped Files 5 Unpacked PE Files 5 Domains 5 URLs 5 Domains and IPs 7 Contacted Domains 7 URLs from Memory and Binaries 7 Contacted IPs 7 General Information 7 Simulations 8 Behavior and APIs 8 Joe Sandbox View / Context 8 IPs 8 Domains 8 ASN 8 JA3 Fingerprints 8 Dropped Files 8 Created / dropped Files 8 Static File Info 9 General 9 File Icon 10 Network Behavior 10 Network Port Distribution 10 UDP Packets 10 Code Manipulations 10 Statistics 10 System Behavior 10 Analysis Process: EXCEL.EXE PID: 6512 Parent PID: 800 10 General 10 File Activities 11 File Written 11 Registry Activities 11 Key Created 11 Key Value Created 11 Disassembly 11 Copyright Joe Security LLC 2021 Page 2 of 11 Windows Analysis Report Open_Purchase_Order_Repo…rt_by_Supplier_-_ProReport_188165628308.xlsx Overview General Information Detection Signatures Classification Sample Open_Purchase_Order_Re No high impact signatures. Name: port_by_Supplier_- _ProReport_188165628308
    [Show full text]
  • Reliability Centered Maintenance
    MTI A Case Maintenance Optimal Study Railway of to Achieve Performance Transit Reliability Centered Maintenance: Funded by U.S. Department of A Case Study of Railway Transit Transportation and California Department of Transportation Maintenance to Achieve Optimal Performance MTI ReportMTI 10-06 MTI Report 10-06 October 2010 MINETA TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE MTI FOUNDER Hon. Norman Y. Mineta The Norman Y. Mineta International Institute for Surface Transportation Policy Studies (MTI) was established by Congress as part MTI BOARD OF TRUSTEES of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991. Reauthorized in 1998, MTI was selected by the U.S. Department of Transportation through a competitive process in 2002 as a national “Center of Excellence.” The Institute is funded by Con- Honorary Co-Chair Rebecca Brewster Steve Heminger Stephanie Pinson gress through the United States Department of Transportation’s Research and Innovative Technology Administration, the Califor- Hon. James Oberstar ** President/COO Executive Director President/COO nia Legislature through the Department of Transportation (Caltrans), and by private grants and donations. Chair American Transportation Metropolitan Transportation Gilbert Tweed Associates, Inc. House Transportation and Research Institute Commission New York, NY Smyrna, GA Oakland, CA Infrastructure Committee The Institute receives oversight from an internationally respected Board of Trustees whose members represent all major surface Hans Rat House of Representatives Donald H. Camph Hon. John Horsley # Secretary General transportation modes. MTI’s focus on policy and management resulted from a Board assessment of the industry’s unmet needs Washington, DC President Executive Director Union Internationale des and led directly to the choice of the San José State University College of Business as the Institute’s home.
    [Show full text]
  • Macarthur BART Station Access Feasibility Study
    Final MacArthur BART Station Access Feasibility Study F EHR & PEERS TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS 332 Pine Street, 4th Floor San Francisco, CA SF06-0245 May 2008 PREPARED BY Matthew Ridgway, Principal Meghan Mitman, Transportation Planner/Engineer Emily Johnson, Transportation Engineer Sam Tabibnia, Senior Transportation Engineer Greg Saur, Senior Transportation Engineer ON BEHALF OF Kathy Kleinbaum, Community and Economic Development Agency (CEDA), Redevelopment Division Mohamed Alaoui, CEDA, Transportation Services Division Jason Patton, CEDA, Transportation Services Division Jeff Ordway, Manager of Property Development Val Menotti, Manager of Alameda County Planning F. Kenya Wheeler, Senior Planner IN ASSOCIATION WITH Lynette Dias, Principal Charity Wagner, Senior Planner Joe McCarthy, MacArthur Transit Community Partners, LLC 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................................... 8 Purpose ............................................................................................................................................................... 8 Background.......................................................................................................................................................... 8 Existing Conditions and Access Objectives ........................................................................................................ 9 Access Strategies.............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Agrofuels in the Americas.Pdf
    Agrofuels in the Americas. Edited by Richard Jonasse, PhD. Copyright © 2009 Institute for Food and Development Policy. All rights reserved. Food First Books 398 60th Street Oakland, CA 94618 510-654-4400 www.foodfirst.org Cover and text design by Richard Jonasse Production: Richard Jonasse Acknowledgements: This project began a little over a year ago with five of the authors sitting around a table at Food First in Oakland, CA. They included Annie Shattuck, Isabella Kenfield, Jessica Aguirre, Gretchen Gordon, Ellen Tarby, and myself. Beyond the wonderful work of the authors herein, we would like to thank Eric Holt-Giménez for providing his insights and many key paragraphs to most of the pieces herein. Annie Shattuck, had a hand in every article. Marilyn Borchardt provided tremendous support, humor, feedback, and commentary. Martha and Rowena shared their kindness and mung beans. There have been a number of people here who have stepped in to help with research, fact checking, translation, proofreading, citation hunting, fact-finding, and general commentary. These include: Annie, Marilyn, Martha, Jessica Aguirre, Jody Zaitlin, Karla Pena, Tamara Wattnem, Leonora Hurtado, Loren Peabody, Zack Zimbalist, Matt Dintenfass, Angie Rodriguez, Maria Barrera, Ellen Tyler, Amanda El-Khoury, Mihir Mankad, Jasmine Tilley, William Wroblewski, and Matt King. About the Author: Richard Jonasse is currently a Research Fellow at Food First in Oakland, CA. His research interests lie in development issues, including International Finance Institutions, food sovereignty, labor/human rights, and environmental sustainability. He has a Masters Degree in Telecommunication and Film from University of Oregon, and a Ph.D. in Communication (emphasis in technology studies) from U.
    [Show full text]
  • DPIA Office 365 for the Web and Mobile Office Apps Data Protection
    authe DPIA Office 365 for the Web and mobile Office apps Data protection impact assessment on the processing of diagnostic data Date 30 June 2020 DPIA Office for the Web and mobile Office apps SLM Microsoft Rijk 30 June 2020 Colophon DPIA by Ministry of Justice and Security Strategic Vendor Management Microsoft (SLM Microsoft Rijk) Turfmarkt 147 2511 DP The Hague PO Box 20301 2500 EH The Hague www.rijksoverheid.nl/jenv Contact Paul van den Berg E [email protected] T 070 370 79 11 Project name DPIA report diagnostic data processing in Microsoft Office 365 for the Web and mobile Office apps (report delivered March 2020, Update June 2020) Appendix Overview telemetry data observed in iOS and Office for the Web apps Authors Privacy Company Sjoera Nas and Floor Terra, senior advisors, with the help of work student Lotte aan de Stegge www.privacycompany.eu Page 3 of 138 DPIA Office for the Web and mobile Office apps SLM Microsoft Rijk 30 June 2020 CONTENTS Colophon 3 Summary 7 Introduction 17 Part A. Description of the data processing 24 1. The processing of diagnostic data 24 1.1 About Office for the Web, the mobile Office apps and the Connected Experiences 24 1.2 Difference between content, functional and diagnostic data 33 1.3 Different types of diagnostic data 34 2. Personal data and data subjects 35 2.1 Definitions of different types of personal data 36 2.2 Diagnostic data mobile Office apps 37 2.3 Outgoing traffic to third parties mobile Office apps 40 2.4 Results access request mobile Office apps 49 2.5 Diagnostic data Office for the Web 51 2.6 Outgoing traffic to third parties Office for the Web 52 2.7 Results access requests Office for the Web 55 2.8 Diagnostic data Connected Experiences 59 2.9 Analytical services based on the system-generated log files 60 2.10 Types of personal data and data subjects 62 3.
    [Show full text]
  • RRN Humanitarian Mine Action
    March 2000 R ELIEF AND REHABILITATION NETWORK RRN 32 paper NETWORK Humanitarian Mine Action: The First Decade of a New Sector in Humanitarian Aid by Chris Horwood Abstract There are two important messages concerning who may have had very little exposure to the mine action that emerge from this paper. The details of mine action and its dramatic growth first is that after only a few years of as a sector in the last 10 years. The paper is mobilisation, campaigning and project also designed to present certain definitions, initiation there are, in place, the forces and premises and issues that have emerged within legislation to effectively address the threat of the mine action sector in recent years. It may landmines in the coming years, rather than also serve as a resource document as it decades or centuries. The second is that mine disassembles and identifies the issues and action cannot be successful as an isolated, main players in global mine action. specialised sub-sector of the aid world but must be seen as a legitimate component of The start of a new century and a decade after emergency, rehabilitation and development the initiation of humanitarian mine action assistance. programmes seems a suitable point to review progress to date, and open the issues facing This paper is specifically written for the aid the mine action sector to the wider aid community outside the mine action sector community. ○○○○○○○○○○○○○ Please send comments on this paper to: As from 1 April 2000 the RRN will be Relief and Rehabilitation Network (RRN) changing its name to the Humanitarian Overseas Development Institute Practice Network – HPN.
    [Show full text]