CPES Report 9Th Release July 1-2007 to June 30-2009.Pdf
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
CIAP-PDCB CONSOLIDATED CONSTRUCTORS PERFORMANCE SUMMARY REPORT (CPES REPORTS) 9TH RELEASE (ON-GOING/COMPLETED PROJECTS) FROM JULY 1, 2007- JUNE 30, 2009 CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY AUTHORITY OF THE PHILIPPINES (CIAP) PHILIPPINE DOMESTIC CONSTRUCTION BOARD (PDCB) 5/F Executive Building Center, 369 Sen. Gil J. Puyat Avenue cor. Makati ave. Makati City Telephone Nos. 896-1801; 897-0791; Fax No. 897-0791 CONSOLIDATED CONSTRUCTORS PERFORMANCE SUMMARY REPORT CPES Reports - On-going and Completed Projects from July 1, 2007- June 30, 2009 BACKGROUND: This report is prepared in connection with the REPORT COVERAGE: implementation of Constructors Performance Evaluation System This report contains CPES rating and other project-related (CPES) pursuant to Section 12, Annex E - Evaluation of information of on-going and completed foreign assisted (FA) and Contractors Performance of the Implementing Rules and locally funded (LF) infrastructure projects being undertaken by Regulations (IRR) of RA No. 9184 (Government Procurement either local, foreign or joint venture constructors. The projects Reform Act). Item 4 - Submission and Dissemination of presented in these report covers: road, bridge, housing, building, Evaluation Results of Section 12, specifically mandated PDCB to ports and harbor, irrigation and flood control, and water supply consolidate the CPES evaluation results of all ongoing and projects. completed projects and disseminate the same to all offices/agencies/corporations concerned. REPORT CONTENTS: USES OF CPES INFORMATION: The CPES rating and other information is designed to Presented in this report are the names of constructors serve the information needs of the following: a) government arranged alphabetically with the corresponding project agencies undertaking infrastructure projects; b) industry planners classification. Information available in this report comprises three and decision makers, c) constructors, d) project owners, e) (3) parts, as follows: 1) Constructor General Information; 2) banking and financing institutions, f) insurance companies, g) Project Data; and 3) CPES Rating. consulting firms, h) professional associations, and i) embassies. Information on contractors CPES ratings shall be used for Part 1 of the report includes the name of constructor/s and the following purposes: a) Pre-qualification/Eligibility Screening of PCAB License Number. Constructors; b) Awarding of Contracts; c) Project Monitoring and Control; d) Issuance of Certificate of Completion; e) Policy Formulation/Review; f) Industry Planning; and g) Granting of Information contained in Part 2 pertains to the project Incentives/Awards, and in adopting measure to further improve name, Implementing Agency, contract amount, and status of performance of contractors in the prosecution of government project (on-going or completed). projects. 1 Part 3 includes data on CPES rating per criteria, as follows: a) workmanship, b) materials, c) time, d) facilities, e) environmental, safety and health, and f) resources deployment, and the CPES visit Rating and over-all /Final Rating and its Qualitative Description. SOURCES OF INFORMATION Data contained in this report were culled from the CPES Summary Report submitted by the *Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH), Department of Transportation and Communications (DOTC), Department of Science and Technology (DOST), National Irrigation Administration (NIA), National Housing Authority (NHA), Philippine Ports Authority (PPA), Bases Conversion Development Authority (BCDA), Polytechnic (PUP), Department of Education (DepEd) and University of the Philippines (U.P.) covering the period July 1, 2007- June 30, 2009 As regards to data on negative slippage, this is when constructor got 0.00 on time for 15% or more negative slippage, this matter may be brought about by any of the three (3) problems: a) Constructor-Related Problems, Agency-Related Problems; and Other Related Problems. Please see the enumerated problems on each classification on page 6 of this cover page. If you need particular information on the reason for the negative slippage of each concerned contractor, please contact the agency implementing the project. For particular information on the data of each of the CPES Reports, please contact the person-in-charge of the concerned implementing agencies listed below: Melrose Pailma (DPWH) Wilfredo C. Borbor (DOTC) Arnaldo C. Reyes (DOST) Tess Pantalla (NIA) Tel No. 304-3511 Tel No. 726-3508 Tel No. 837-2071 loc: 2120 Tel No. 927-0923 Ma. Otelia F. Eclavea (NHA) Arnold Villegas (PPA) Bong Fortunado (BCDA) Angela Israel (PUP) Tel No. 928-4561 Tel No. 527-8356 loc: 356 Tel No. 816-6666 Tel No. 713-1488 Oliver R. Hernandez (DepEd) Ariel S. Betan (U.P.) Tel No. 637-6464 Tel Nos. 925-0984; 981-8500 Loc. 2525/2526 For further information and queries, you may visit us at Philippine Domestic Construction Board (PDCB), 5th Floor Executive Building Center, 369 Sen. Gil J. Puyat Avenue cor. Makati Ave. Makati City Philippines; call us at 897-0791/896-1801; or e-mail us at [email protected]. You may access this report on this website http://www.gppb.gov.ph. 2 CONSTRUCTORS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM (CPES) IMPLEMENTING GUIDELINES I. ASPECTS OF EVALUATION 1. During Construction (60% for Horizontal Projects such as Road, Bridge, Ports & Harbor, Irrigation and Flood Control, Water Supply and Sewerage, etc., and 70% for Vertical Projects such as Housing, Building, Power Transmission Line and Substation) - minimum of two (2) visits with the conduct of first visit when the actual project accomplishment is at least 30% except for projects with a duration of 90 calendar days and below which may be subjected to just one (1) final visit. 2. Upon Completion (40% for Horizontal Projects and 30% for Vertical Projects) - final visit when the Implementing Office reported 100% completion. II. CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION Amended Guidelines as Approved by NEDA InfraCom 27 August 2008 During Construction Upon Completion Criteria Maximum Rating Criteria Maximum Rating Workmanship 0.40 Workmanship 0.50 Materials 0.30 Materials 0.20 Time 0.15 Time 0.30 Facilities 0.03 TOTAL 1.00 Environmental, Safety and 0.07 Health (ESH) Resources Deployment 0.05 TOTAL 1.00 3 As approved by NEDA InfraCom 19 May 2005 During Construction Upon Completion Criteria Maximum Rating Criteria Maximum Rating Workmanship 0.40 Workmanship 0.40 Materials 0.30 Materials 0.30 Time 0.10 Time 0.30 Facilities 0.03 TOTAL 1.00 Environmental, Safety 0.07 and Health (ESH) Resources Deployment 0.10 TOTAL 1.00 As approved by NEDA InfraCom 30 January 1998 During Construction Upon Completion Criteria Maximum Rating Criteria Maximum Rating Workmanship 0.40 Workmanship 0.50 Materials 0.30 Time 0.50 Time 0.10 TOTAL 1.00 Facilities 0.03 Environmental, Safety and Health (ESH) 0.07 Resources Deployment 0.10 TOTAL 1.00 4 III. CPES RATING & ITS QUALITATIVE DESCRIPTION CPES Implementing Guidelines as Approved on 27 August 2008 *CPES RATING Ranges Rating Qualitative Description >96% Outstanding >89% but < 96% Very Satisfactory >82% but < 89% Satisfactory >75% but < 82% Unsatisfactory < 75% Poor As Approved on May 2005 and 30 January 1998 *CPES RATING Ranges Rating Qualitative Description >90% Outstanding >80% but < 90% Very Satisfactory >70% but < 80% Satisfactory >60% but < 70% Fair < 60% Poor 5 *CAUSES OF DELAY CONSTRUCTOR-RELATED PROBLEMS AGENCY RELATED PROBLEMS C-W01 - Insufficient manpower deployed in project site A-VO1-Delays in the approval of variation orders C-EO1 - Breakdown of equipment/equipment not operational A-TO1- Delays in the approval of contract time extension C-EO2 - Lack/Insufficient/Inadequate equipment deployed in project site A-SO1- Delays in the approval of suspension order C-MO1- Lack/Inadequate/Insufficient supply of construction A-DO1- Changes in construction designs Materials A-FO1- Delays in the release of funds C-RO1- Lack of financial resources A-RO1- Right of Way (ROW) acquisition problem (squatter relocation problems, relocation of utilities, (i.e. PLDT, MERALCO posts and other similar cases) 6 *CAUSES OF DELAY OTHER-RELATED PROBLEMS O-WO1- Unfavorable weather condition (Occurrence of natural calamities; occurrence of flooding/ siltation on site; unworkable ground condition) O-PO1- Insurgence or peace and order problems/civil disturbances O-TO1- Third Party intervention *Can be a reason for the negative slippage of constructor (please see the CPES reports of constructor from the agency concerned.) 7 CIAP-PDCB CONSTRUCTORS PERFORMANCE SUMMARY REPORT CPES Reports-On-going and Completed Projects from July 1, 2007 to June 30, 2009 CONTRACT FINAL LICENSE *IMPL. CPES VISIT RATING/QUALIT NAME OF CONSTRUCTOR PROJECT AMOUNT STATUS WMS MTL TIME FAC ESH RDR NO. AGENCY DUR (C.D.) RATING ATIVE (Php, M) DESCRIPTION Road Concreting at Brgy. *87.50% 11-18-70 Construction 32944 I 0.855 18 C 0.375 0.200 0.300 - - - 87.50 Sallacapo Satisfactory Const. of Cemented Footbridge, 91.06% 121 Construction 21686 III 0.946 60 C 0.304 0.285 0.300 - - - 88.90 Sapang Bayan Outstanding Const. of MPB @ Bulacan State 121 Construction 21686 III 0.945 54 O 0.356 0.225 0.100 0.030 0.035 0.100 84.60 - University Compound 121 Construction Corporation *84.20% 21686 Const. of MPB NCR 3.341 90 C 0.393 0.149 0.300 - - - 84.20 (Formerly: 121 Construction) V. Satisfactory 121 Construction Corporation *78.00% 21686 Const. of MPB NCR 3.821 90 C 0.280 0.200 0.300 - - - 78.00 (Formerly: 121 Construction) Satisfactory 121 Construction Corporation Impvt. of MPB at Sta. Maria Agro- *96.50% 21686 III 1.717 90 C 0.365 0.300 0.300 - - - 96.50 (Formerly: 121 Construction) Industrial High School Outstanding *94.30% 2H2L Construction 16293 Conc. of Road @ Package 3-2 XI 0.565 120 C 0.343 0.300 0.300 - - - 94.30 Oustanding Const. (Completion) of Sch. Bldg. *86.60% 2H2L Construction 16293 IV-A 0.791 120 C 0.366 0.200 0.300 - - - 86.60 @ dela Paz E/S V. Satisfactory *96.50% 2H2L Construction 16293 Const. of MPB @ Jacinto St. XI 0.471 105 C 0.365 0.300 0.300 - - - 96.50 Oustanding Impvt.