FLOOD WARNING SYSTEM for the NORMAN RIVER
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Improved Continuing Losses Estimation Using Initial Loss-Continuing Loss Model for Medium Sized Rural Catchments
American J. of Engineering and Applied Sciences 2 (4): 796-803, 2009 ISSN 1941-7020 © 2009 Science Publications Improved Continuing Losses Estimation Using Initial Loss-Continuing Loss Model for Medium Sized Rural Catchments Mahbub Ilahee and Monzur Alam Imteaz Faculty of Engineering and Industrial Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Melbourne, VIC 3122, Australia Abstract: Problem statement: The rainfall based design flood estimation techniques are commonly adopted in hydrological design and require a number of inputs including information on soil loss characteristics. Approach: A conceptual loss model known as the ‘Initial Loss-Continuing Loss (IL- CL) model’ is widely used in Australia. Results: The Initial Loss (IL) occurs at the beginning of the rainfall event, prior to the commencement of surface runoff and the Continuing Loss (CL) is the average rate of loss throughout the remainder of the storm. The currently recommended design loss values depicted in “Australian Rainfall and Runoff Vol. 1” for Queensland (Australia) has some basic limitations. This study investigated how more accurate CL values can be estimated and derived for medium sized tropical Queensland catchments using long term rainfall and streamflow data. Accuracy in CL estimation has got significant implications in the estimation of design floods. Conclusion/Recommendations: The results showed that CL value is not fixed and constant through out the duration of the storm but the CL value decays with the duration of the storm. Key words: Initial loss, continuing loss, rural catchments, flood estimation, rainfall-runoff modeling PROBLEM STATEMENT topography, soil characteristics, vegetation and climate; the components exhibit a high degree of temporal and Flood estimation is often required in hydrologic spatial variability during high rainfall events. -
An Assessment of Agricultural Potential of Soils in the Gulf Region, North Queensland
REPORT TO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES REGIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT (RID), NORTH REGION ON An Assessment of Agricultural Potential of Soils in the Gulf Region, North Queensland Volume 1 February 1999 Peter Wilson (Land Resource Officer, Land Information Management) Seonaid Philip (Senior GIS Technician) Department of Natural Resources Resource Management GIS Unit Centre for Tropical Agriculture 28 Peters Street, Mareeba Queensland 4880 DNRQ990076 Queensland Government Technical Report This report is intended to provide information only on the subject under review. There are limitations inherent in land resource studies, such as accuracy in relation to map scale and assumptions regarding socio-economic factors for land evaluation. Before acting on the information conveyed in this report, readers should ensure that they have received adequate professional information and advice specific to their enquiry. While all care has been taken in the preparation of this report neither the Queensland Government nor its officers or staff accepts any responsibility for any loss or damage that may result from any inaccuracy or omission in the information contained herein. © State of Queensland 1999 For information about this report contact [email protected] ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The authors thank the input of staff of the Department of Natural Resources GIS Unit Mareeba. Also that of DNR water resources staff, particularly Mr Jeff Benjamin. Mr Steve Ockerby, Queensland Department of Primary Industries provided invaluable expertise and advice for the development of the agricultural suitability assessment. Mr Phil Bierwirth of the Australian Geological Survey Organisation (AGSO) provided an introduction to and knowledge of Airborne Gamma Spectrometry. Assistance with the interpretation of AGS data was provided through the Department of Natural Resources Enhanced Resource Assessment project. -
Surface Water Ambient Network (Water Quality) 2020-21
Surface Water Ambient Network (Water Quality) 2020-21 July 2020 This publication has been compiled by Natural Resources Divisional Support, Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy. © State of Queensland, 2020 The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of its information. The copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. Under this licence you are free, without having to seek our permission, to use this publication in accordance with the licence terms. You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the State of Queensland as the source of the publication. Note: Some content in this publication may have different licence terms as indicated. For more information on this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. The Queensland Government shall not be liable for technical or other errors or omissions contained herein. The reader/user accepts all risks and responsibility for losses, damages, costs and other consequences resulting directly or indirectly from using this information. Summary This document lists the stream gauging stations which make up the Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy (DNRME) surface water quality monitoring network. Data collected under this network are published on DNRME’s Water Monitoring Information Data Portal. The water quality data collected includes both logged time-series and manual water samples taken for later laboratory analysis. Other data types are also collected at stream gauging stations, including rainfall and stream height. Further information is available on the Water Monitoring Information Data Portal under each station listing. -
The Freshwater Crayfish (Family Parastacidae) of Queensland
AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS Riek, E. F., 1951. The freshwater crayfish (family Parastacidae) of Queensland. Records of the Australian Museum 22(4): 368–388. [30 June 1951]. doi:10.3853/j.0067-1975.22.1951.615 ISSN 0067-1975 Published by the Australian Museum, Sydney nature culture discover Australian Museum science is freely accessible online at http://publications.australianmuseum.net.au 6 College Street, Sydney NSW 2010, Australia 11ft! FRESHWATER CRAYFISH (FAMILY PARASTACIDAE) OF QUEENSLAND WITH AN ApPENDIX DESORIBING OTHlm AV5'lHALIAN SPEClEf'. By E. F. HIEK. (;ommonwealth Scientific and Industrial l~csearch Organization - Divhdon of Entomology, Canberra, A.C.T. (Figures 1-13.) Freshwater crayfish occur in almost every body of fresh water from artificial damfl and natural billabongs (I>tanding water) to headwater creeks and large rivers (flowing water). Generally the species are of considerable size and therefore easily collected, but even so many of the larger forms are unknown scientifically. This paper deals with all the species that have been collected from Queensland. It also includes a few species from New South Wales and other States. No doubt additional species will be found and some of the mOre variable series, at present included under the one specific namc, will be further subdivided. From Queensland nine species are described as new, making a total of seventeen species (of three genera) recorded from that State. The type localities of all but two of these species are in Queensland but some are not restricted to the State. Clark's 1936 and subsequent papers have been used as the basis for further taxonomic studies of the Australian freshwater crayfish. -
Port of Karumba, July 2021
4. Port description 4.1 General Information Karumba is situated in the south-east corner of the Gulf of Carpentaria, 530 kilometres west of Cairns at the mouth of the Norman River. The Karumba Shipping Channel has been maintained in the past for Zinc concentrate exports. The mine was closed in February 2016 and there will be no more large scale maintenance dredging of the shipping channel. Far North Queensland Ports Corporation Limited, who manage the port, have advised that they will not be commissioning maintenance dredging therefore it is expected that the channel will gradually reduce in depth and width due to siltation. A small scale maintenance dredging campaign took place in 2018 to remove siltation for the commencement of limited zinc concentrate exports. Studies undertaken by Far North Queensland Ports Corporation Limited indicate that the minimum depth of the channel could be reduced to -2.0m LAT within 2 years – the rate of siltation may be effected by the strength of the NW monsoon during the wet season. Karumba also provides a trawler base for the prawn and fishing industry, the export of live cattle and a community port for servicing townships in the area. 4.2 Pilotage area The Karumba Pilotage area is described in Schedule 2 of the Transport Operations (Marine Safety) Regulation 2016 as the area of: a) Waters at the high water mark consisting of the following: • the Norman River and connected waterways system from the head of navigation to the river mouth • from the river mouth, the waters within a 10 nautical mile radius centred at the north head of the Norman River entrance; and The navigable waters of rivers and creeks flowing, directly or indirectly, into the waters in paragraph (a). -
Epm 16267 – Clara River 1 Report for the 12 Months Ending 19 January 2011
EPM 16267 – CLARA RIVER 1 REPORT FOR THE 12 MONTHS ENDING 19 JANUARY 2011 Prepared by: Mark Sheppard Prepared for: Qld Dept Mines and Energy Submitted by: Bowen Energy Ltd Date: February 2011 EPM 16267 – CLARA RIVER 1 Relinquishment Report 19 January 2011 CONTENTS Page No. SUMMARY……………………………………………………………………… 2 1.0 INTRODUCTION …………………………………………………………... 2 2.0 TENEMENT ………………………………………………. 2 3.0 PREVIOUS EXPLORATION ………………………………………………. 3 4.0 EXPLORATION UNDERTAKEN ………………………………… 5 5.0 GEOLOGY ………………………………………………………………….. 5 5.1 Volcanic and Igneous Rocks……………………………………………… 5 5.2 Sedimentary rocks ..…………………………………………………..…... 6 5.3 Structure…………………………………………………………………… 7 6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS …………………….……. 7 7.0 REFERENCES ………………………………………………………………. 7 TABLES Table .1. Relinquish Sub blocks ………………………………………………… 2 Table .2. Retained Sub blocks ………………………………………………… 3 FIGURES Figure .1. Relinquished sub blocks……………………….. ……………….. 4 Figure .2. Magnetic Signature of Rocks Under Project Area ……………….. 9 Figure .3. Locality of EPM 16267 Clara River 1 ………………………………… 10 Figure .4. Regional Structural Trends ……………………………………………. 11 Bowen Energy Ltd February 2011 1 EPM 16267 – CLARA RIVER 1 Relinquishment Report 19 January 2011 SUMMARY Exploration Permit for Minerals (EPM) 16267 – Clara River 1 was granted to Bowen Energy Ltd for a term of 3 years on 20 January 2009. The tenement is located in 98 sub- blocks 126km SSE of the town of Croydon. The EPM was granted to explore for economic sulphide copper nickel deposits, and possibly economic uranium deposits. Bowen Energy originally applied for 17 Tenements in the Croydon Project area, but has subsequently rationalized these original 17 down to 3 tenements which include EPM 16272, 16274, and 16267. Bowen Energy has also picked up another tenement located on the south-western edge of the 3 remaining tenements which is EPM 17364. -
The Gulf Savannah Is a Far Medical Centres at Georgetown, Forsayth, Normally in Force from October to February
Head Office: Department of Natural Resources and Water Cnr Main & Vulture Sts, Woolloongabba, Brisbane Locked Bag 40, Coorparoo Delivery Centre, Qld. 4151 Ph (07) 3896 3216, Fax (07) 3896 3510 For all your regional and recreational map needs, Sunmap products are available from Departmental service centres, distributors and selected retailers throughout Queensland or the Queensland Government Bookshop at: www.publications.qld.gov.au. The development of aviation and the inspiration of John Flynn To view the complete range of products and services, visit our home combined after World War I to include the remote Gulf frontier in page at: www.nrw.qld.gov.au. the network of Flying Doctor Services which made up the ‘mantle of safety’ for the inland areas of Australia. The Etheridge Goldfield, the ‘poor man’s goldfield’ has never been worked out. Discovered by Richard Daintree in 1869, the Etheridge survived the rushes to the Palmer Over the bush ‘roads’ rolled the legendary and other richer fields in North Queensland. The ghosts Founded in 1865 by commercial and pastoral interests led by The traditional industries of the Gulf The Normanton to Croydon Railway is a living relic of the age of steam railways. Originally coaches of Cobb and Co. and other lines, of such towns as Charleston on the Etheridge and Robert Towns, Burketown in its early days was a wild frontier Savannah are fishing and grazing, with intended to link the port of Normanton to the copper mines of Cloncurry, the discovery of gold carrying mail and passengers between Gilberton on the Gilbert Field still dot the Savannah and Weipa town, the refuge of law breakers and adventurers, a town which beef cattle succeeding sheep, which were around Croydon led to its diversion to that Goldfield in 1891. -
Surface Water Network Review Final Report
Surface Water Network Review Final Report 16 July 2018 This publication has been compiled by Operations Support - Water, Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy. © State of Queensland, 2018 The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of its information. The copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. Under this licence you are free, without having to seek our permission, to use this publication in accordance with the licence terms. You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the State of Queensland as the source of the publication. Note: Some content in this publication may have different licence terms as indicated. For more information on this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. The Queensland Government shall not be liable for technical or other errors or omissions contained herein. The reader/user accepts all risks and responsibility for losses, damages, costs and other consequences resulting directly or indirectly from using this information. Interpreter statement: The Queensland Government is committed to providing accessible services to Queenslanders from all culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds. If you have difficulty in understanding this document, you can contact us within Australia on 13QGOV (13 74 68) and we will arrange an interpreter to effectively communicate the report to you. Surface -
Three Rivers Irrigation Project Initial Advice Statement
Three Rivers Irrigation Project Initial Advice Statement June 2015 TRIP Initial Advice Statement: Stanbroke TRIP Initial Advice Statement: Stanbroke TABLE OF CONTENTS GLOSSARY ..................................................................................................................................... I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................. III 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Background ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.1.1. Purpose and Scope of the Initial Advice Statement ................................................. 1 2. THE PROPONENT.................................................................................................................... 3 2.1. Stanbroke Pty Ltd .............................................................................................................. 3 3. THE NATURE OF THE PROPOSAL ............................................................................................. 4 3.1. Scope of the Project .......................................................................................................... 4 3.1.1. Water Extraction ....................................................................................................... 4 3.1.2. Offstream Storages .................................................................................................. -
Carpentaria Shire Local Disaster Management Plan Evacuation 1
Carpentaria Shire Local Disaster Management Plan Evacuation 1 Forward The Carpentaria Local Disaster Management Group is committed to ensuring the safety of the community in times of natural disaster. The decision to evacuate members of the community will not be a decision made lightly, the group is committed to ensuring that any decision is made using all of the information available to them at the time. The disaster management group will provide the community with everything at its disposal to ensure that any evacuation is conducted safely; it does however acknowledge that final decision to evacuate remains with the individual. Endorsement This plan has been endorsed by the Carpentaria Local Disaster Management Group Chairperson Local Disaster Management Group Date: / / 2009 Carpentaria Shire Local Disaster Management Plan Evacuation 2 Contents Authority to plan 5 Distribution list 5 Amendment list 6 Definitions 7-8 Abbreviations 9 Part One: This section is the overarching evacuation plan of the Carpentaria Local Disaster Management Group. Later sections of this plan deal with threat specific evacuation planning. 10 Aims and objectives Scope 10 Geographic and Topographic information 11-16 The evacuation strategy 17 The planning considerations 18 Activation of the plan 18 Roles and responsibilities 19 Warning Phase 20-21 Withdrawal Phase 21 Shelter 21 Return 22 Part Two: This section of the plan details the evacuation plan in the event of flooding from the Norman River threatening the township of Karumba. 26 Aims and objectives Scope 26 Geographic and Topographic information 27-28 The evacuation strategy 29 The planning considerations 29-34 Activation of the plan 35 Roles and responsibilities 36 Warning Phase 37 Withdrawal Phase 37 Shelter 37 Return 37 Carpentaria Shire Local Disaster Management Plan Evacuation 3 Contents (cont..) Part Three: This section of the plan details the evacuation plan in the event of flooding from the Norman River threatening the township of Normanton. -
The Revised Bradfield Scheme
THE REVISED BRADFIELD SCHEME THE PROPOSED DIVERSION OF THE UPPER TULLY I HERBERT BURDEKIN . RIVERS ON TO THE INLAND PLAINS OF NORTH AND CENTRAL QUEENSLAND PROPOSAL OF QUEENSLAND N.P.A. WATER RESOURCES SUB-COMMITTEE NOVEMBER 1981. THEBRADFffiLDSCHEME . ·,·:.:.·:::·;: .. The scheme to divert water from the coastal rivers to inland Queensland was proposed by ~e ll.oted engineer Dr J J C Bradfield in 1938. He envisaged diverting water from the coastal Tully,· Herbert, and Burdekin Rivers across the Great Dividing Range to supply the inland watei::s in Queensia1l<i .. The major inland water courses to receive the diverted water would be the Flinders and Thompson Rivers and Torrens Creek. Bradfield's work was based on elevation (height) information obtained from a barometer that he carried on horse back and the extremely sparse streamflow data that was available at the time. Bradfield's scheme emphasised providing water for stock and fodder to offset the recurring problem of drought, plus recharge for the aquifers of the Great Artesian Basin. He paid little attention to using the transferred water for irrigated agriculture or to competing demands for water east of the Divide for irrigation and hydro power generation. In about 1983 the Queensland Government commissioned the consulting engineering fii:m, Cameron McNamara Pty Ltd, to undertake a re-assessment of the Bradfield scheme. The final report by the consultants was not released by the Government however some information from the report was disseminated. A summary of that information is:-. • It wouldbe·possible to·divert 924 000 megalitres of water per year to the Hughenden area.· .. -
Baddiley Peter Second Statement Annex PB2-831.Pdf
In the matter of the Commissions of Inquiry Act 1950 Commissions of Inquiry Order (No.1) 2011 Queensland Floods Commission of Inquiry Second Witness Statement of Peter Baddiley Annexure “PB2-8(31)” PB2-8(31) 1 PB2-8(31) 2 PB2-8 (31) Queensland Flood Warning Summary 1 December 2010 to 31 January 2011 IDQ20885 Australian Government Bureau of Meteorology Queensland Flood Summary Issued at 9:47 AM on Wednesday the 1st of December 2010 The following Watches/Warnings are current: FLOOD WARNING FOR THE BULLOO RIVER FLOOD WARNING FOR THE WARREGO RIVER FLOOD WARNING FOR THE THOMSON AND BARCOO RIVERS AND COOPER CREEK For more information on flood warnings see: www.bom.gov.au/qld/warnings/ Additional information: Other flooding includes: Diamantina River: Minor flood levels are falling at Diamantina Lakes with minor flooding rising slowly at Monkira. Paroo River: Minor flooding is falling slowly at Hungerford. Moonie River: Minor flooding is rising at Nindigully. Dawson River: Minor flooding is rising at Tarana Crossing. Warnings and River Height Bulletins are available at http://www.bom.gov.au/qld/flood/ . Flood Warnings are also available on telephone 1300 659 219 at a low call cost of 27.5 cents, more from mobile, public and satellite phones. IDQ20885 Australian Government Bureau of Meteorology Queensland Flood Summary Issued at 5:30 PM on Wednesday the 1st of December 2010 The following Watches/Warnings are current: FLOOD WARNING FOR THE BULLOO RIVER FLOOD WARNING FOR THE FITZROY RIVER BASIN FLOOD WARNING FOR THE THOMSON AND BARCOO RIVERS AND COOPER CREEK FLOOD WARNING FOR THE WARREGO RIVER PB2-8(31) 3 Additional information: Other flooding includes: Diamantina River: Minor flood levels are falling at Diamantina Lakes with minor flooding rising at Monkira.