Analysis of Refinery Chemical Emissions and Health Effects

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Analysis of Refinery Chemical Emissions and Health Effects Analysis of Refinery Chemical Emissions and Health Effects Draft September 2017 Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment California Environmental Protection Agency Matthew Rodriquez Secretary, California Environmental Protection Agency Lauren Zeise, Ph.D. Director, Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment Analysis of Refinery Chemical Emissions and Health Effects OEHHA Draft September 2017 LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment California Environmental Protection Agency Authors1 Karen Riveles, PhD MPH Alyssa Nagai Reviewers Kenneth Kloc, PhD James F. Collins, PhD John Faust, PhD Melanie A. Marty, PhD Allan Hirsch Lauren Zeise, PhD 1The authors would like to acknowledge the contributions of Ms. Lilian Polsky in editing this document. Analysis of Refinery Chemical Emissions and Health Effects OEHHA Draft September 2017 CONTENTS PREFACE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1 II. LIST OF CHEMICALS EMITTED FROM CALIFORNIA REFINERIES ................. 2 III. HEALTH GUIDANCE AND EMERGENCY EXPOSURE VALUES ....................... 6 A. OEHHA AND US EPA HEALTH GUIDANCE VALUES ........................... 6 B. US EPA AND NIOSH EMERGENCY EXPOSURE LEVELS .................. 20 IV. HEALTH EFFECTS OF SELECT CALIFORNIA REFINERY CHEMICALS ........ 25 V. MOST HIGHLY EMITTED CHEMICALS AND OTHER SUPPORTING INFORMATION .................................................................................................. 31 A. CALIFORNIA REFINERY INCIDENT HISTORY ..................................... 32 B. CALIFORNIA REFINERY PROCESS UNITS, EMISSION POINTS, AND EQUIPMENT .................................................................. 33 C. CHEMICAL ANALYSIS CATEGORIES FOR AIR MONITORING ........... 34 D. MOST HIGHLY EMITTED ROUTINE EMISSIONS OF TOXIC AIR CONTAMINANTS FROM CALIFORNIA REFINERIES .......................... 35 E. NON-ROUTINE AND ROUTINE CHEMICAL EMISSIONS ..................... 38 F. REFINERY EMISSIONS IN THE US AND FUEL-BURNING EXPERIMENTS ...................................................................................... 40 VI. CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................. 41 REFERENCES .............................................................................................................. 42 Analysis of Refinery Chemical Emissions and Health Effects OEHHA Draft September 2017 APPENDIX A: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION ON HEALTH EFFECTS OF SELECT REFINERY CHEMICALS ...................................................... A-1 APPENDIX B: CALIFORNIA REFINERY PROCESS UNITS AND EMISSION POINTS WITH ASSOCIATED CHEMICAL EMISSIONS ..................... B-1 APPENDIX C: CALIFORNIA REFINERY CHEMICALS SORTED BY CHEMICAL ANALYSIS CATEGORY ..................................................................... C-1 APPENDIX D: ROUTINE TOXIC AIR CONTAMINANT EMISSIONS FROM CALIFORNIA REFINERIES ................................................................. D-1 APPENDIX E: NON-ROUTINE AND ROUTINE EMISSIONS ...................................... E-1 APPENDIX F: REFINERY EMISSIONS IN THE US AND FUEL-BURNING EXPERIMENTS .................................................................................... F-1 APPENDIX G: DATA ANALYSIS OF REFINERY CHEMICALS ACROSS CATEGORIES ..................................................................................... G-1 APPENDIX H: TOXICITY WEIGHTED TOTALS FOR CHEMICALS RELEASED FROM CALIFORNIA REFINERIES .................................................... H-1 APPENDIX I: LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................. I-1 Analysis of Refinery Chemical Emissions and Health Effects OEHHA Draft September 2017 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. List of Chemicals Emitted from California Refineries ....................................... 3 Table 2. OEHHA and US EPA Health Guidance Values and Descriptions ................... 7 Table 3. Health Guidance Values for Chemicals Emitted from California Refineries .... 8 Table 4. US EPA and NIOSH Emergency Exposure Levels and Descriptions ............ 21 Table 5. Emergency Exposure Levels for Chemicals Emitted from California Refineries ...................................................................................................... 22 Table 6. Health Effects of Select California Refinery Chemicals ................................. 26 Table 7. Process Units, Emission Points, and Equipment Reported to be Associated with California Refinery Incidents .............................................. 33 Table 8. California Refinery Process Units, Emission Points, and Equipment Sorted by Release Type ........................................................................................... 34 Table 9. Chemical Analysis Categories for Air Monitoring ........................................... 34 Table 10. Toxic Air Contaminants with the 10 Highest Routine Emissions from California Refineries ...................................................................................... 37 Table 11. Ten Highest Routine Chemical Emissions by California Refineries ............... 38 Table 12. Ten Highest Non-routine Chemical Emissions by California Refineries ........ 39 Table B1. California Refinery Process Units and Emission Points with Associated Chemical Emissions .................................................................................... B-2 Table C1. California Refinery Chemicals Sorted by Chemical Analysis Category ........ E-1 Table D1. Average Annual Routine Toxic Air Contaminant Emissions for California Refineries ................................................................................................... C-1 Table E1. Annual Routine and Non-routine Chemical Emissions by California Refineries .................................................................................................... E-1 Analysis of Refinery Chemical Emissions and Health Effects OEHHA Draft September 2017 Table F1. Refinery Emissions in the US and Fuel-Burning Experiments..................... F-1 Table G1. Comparison of Chemicals with High Routine Emissions and Health Guidance Values ......................................................................................... G-3 Table G2. OEHHA REL Values for Chemicals with High Routine Emissions .............. G-3 Table G3. Chemicals Sorted by Chemical Analysis Category ..................................... G-4 Table H1. Toxicity Weighted Totals for Chemicals Released from California Refineries ................................................................................................... H-1 Analysis of Refinery Chemical Emissions and Health Effects OEHHA Draft September 2017 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Relative Occurrence of Chemical Analysis Categories in Routine Toxic Air Contaminant Emissions from California Refineries ................................... 37 Figure 2. Relative Occurrence of Chemical Analysis Categories in Routine Chemical Emissions by California Refineries ................................................................. 39 Figure 3. Relative Occurrence of Chemical Analysis Categories in Non-routine Chemical Emissions by California Refineries ................................................. 40 Analysis of Refinery Chemical Emissions and Health Effects OEHHA Draft September 2017 i PREFACE The Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) is collaborating with the California Air Resources Board (ARB) and the Interagency Refinery Task Force to develop information on chemicals emitted from refineries and their health effects. This information may support ARB and other groups in developing plans for air monitoring in the vicinity of refineries in California. In the event of a refinery emergency, knowledge of health guidance values and emissions of chemicals may also help emergency responders characterize potential health effects that may occur following a chemical release. In August 2012, there was a serious fire at the Chevron Refinery in Richmond, CA. During that event an estimated 15,000 people from the nearby community sought care at local emergency departments and clinics. Follow-up investigations of the incident revealed a number of refinery safety issues. In July 2013, the California Air Resources Board (ARB) released a report entitled “Air Monitoring for Accidental Refinery Releases: Assessment of Capabilities and Potential Improvements Project Plan”. This report laid out a stepwise plan to improve California’s refinery air monitoring and emergency response system. The Governor’s report, “Improving Public and Worker Safety at Oil Refineries”, released in February 2014, echoed the importance of monitoring air quality near refineries and resulted in the establishment of an Interagency Refinery Task Force coordinated by the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA). In public meetings following the release of the Governor’s report, community members asked if there existed a complete list of chemicals that could be released from refineries, and if those chemicals had been prioritized for monitoring to ensure that any monitoring system would be tailored – insofar as feasible – to measure the most important chemicals. As a result of these questions from the public, OEHHA used existing information to compile a list of chemicals that may be released from refineries and prioritize that list according to the volume of the chemicals emitted and the toxicity of the
Recommended publications
  • Neurological and Neuroimaging Signs of Reversible Parkinsonism Associated with Manganese Exposure
    [Downloaded free from http://www.neurologyindia.com on Thursday, March 13, 2014, IP: 202.177.173.189] || Click here to download free Android application for this journal Editorial Neurological and neuroimaging signs of reversible Parkinsonism associated with manganese exposure Basant K. Puri Department of Imaging, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK Address for correspondence: Prof. Basant K. Puri, Department of Imaging, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London W12 0HS, UK. E-mail: [email protected] Received : 03-02-2014 Review completed : 03-02-2014 Accepted : 03-02-2014 In this month’s issue of Neurology India, Han The heavy metal manganese (atomic number 25, relative et al. present an unusual case entitled ‘Reversal atomic mass 54.938) lies in group 7 of the periodic table of pallidal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) T1 and has a natural abundance in the earth’s crust that, hyperintensity in a welder presenting as reversible among the heavy metals, is second only to that of iron, parkinsonism’.[1] Parkinsonism is a syndrome of multiple with which it is roughly similar in terms of many of its different etiologies and among the toxic causes of physical and chemical properties (although manganese is parkinsonism are alcohol (ethanol) withdrawal, methanol, harder and more brittle but less refractory).[5] It has one of 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyrodine, inhalant the highest industrial uses of all metals, being important in abuse, metals (including manganese, iron and copper), the production of steel and batteries, in water
    [Show full text]
  • Manganese Toxicity May Appear Slowly Over Months and Years
    MANGANESE 11 2. RELEVANCE TO PUBLIC HEALTH 2.1 BACKGROUND AND ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURES TO MANGANESE IN THE UNITED STATES Manganese is a naturally occurring element and an essential nutrient. Comprising approximately 0.1% of the earth’s crust, it is the twelfth most abundant element and the fifth most abundant metal. Manganese does not exist in nature as an elemental form, but is found mainly as oxides, carbonates, and silicates in over 100 minerals with pyrolusite (manganese dioxide) as the most common naturally-occurring form. As an essential nutrient, several enzyme systems have been reported to interact with or depend on manganese for their catalytic or regulatory function. As such, manganese is required for the formation of healthy cartilage and bone and the urea cycle; it aids in the maintenance of mitochondria and the production of glucose. It also plays a key role in wound-healing. Manganese exists in both inorganic and organic forms. An essential ingredient in steel, inorganic manganese is also used in the production of dry-cell batteries, glass and fireworks, in chemical manufacturing, in the leather and textile industries and as a fertilizer. The inorganic pigment known as manganese violet (manganese ammonium pyrophosphate complex) has nearly ubiquitous use in cosmetics and is also found in certain paints. Organic forms of manganese are used as fungicides, fuel-oil additives, smoke inhibitors, an anti-knock additive in gasoline, and a medical imaging agent. The average manganese soil concentrations in the United States is 40–900 mg/kg; the primary natural source of the manganese is the erosion of crustal rock.
    [Show full text]
  • Manganese and Its Compounds: Environmental Aspects
    This report contains the collective views of an international group of experts and does not necessarily represent the decisions or the stated policy of the United Nations Environment Programme, the International Labour Organization, or the World Health Organization. Concise International Chemical Assessment Document 63 MANGANESE AND ITS COMPOUNDS: ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS First draft prepared by Mr P.D. Howe, Mr H.M. Malcolm, and Dr S. Dobson, Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Monks Wood, United Kingdom The layout and pagination of this pdf file are not identical to the document in print Corrigenda published by 12 April 2005 have been incorporated in this file Published under the joint sponsorship of the United Nations Environment Programme, the International Labour Organization, and the World Health Organization, and produced within the framework of the Inter-Organization Programme for the Sound Management of Chemicals. World Health Organization Geneva, 2004 The International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS), established in 1980, is a joint venture of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), the International Labour Organization (ILO), and the World Health Organization (WHO). The overall objectives of the IPCS are to establish the scientific basis for assessment of the risk to human health and the environment from expos ure to chemicals, through international peer review processes, as a prerequisite for the promotion of chemical safety, and to provide technical assistance in strengthening national capacities for the sound management
    [Show full text]
  • 10Neurodevelopmental Effects of Childhood Exposure to Heavy
    Neurodevelopmental E¤ects of Childhood Exposure to Heavy Metals: 10 Lessons from Pediatric Lead Poisoning Theodore I. Lidsky, Agnes T. Heaney, Jay S. Schneider, and John F. Rosen Increasing industrialization has led to increased exposure to neurotoxic metals. By far the most heavily studied of these metals is lead, a neurotoxin that is particularly dangerous to the developing nervous system of children. Awareness that lead poison- ing poses a special risk for children dates back over 100 years, and there has been increasing research on the developmental e¤ects of this poison over the past 60 years. Despite this research and growing public awareness of the dangers of lead to chil- dren, government regulation has lagged scientific knowledge; legislation has been in- e¤ectual in critical areas, and many new cases of poisoning occur each year. Lead, however, is not the only neurotoxic metal that presents a danger to children. Several other heavy metals, such as mercury and manganese, are also neurotoxic, have adverse e¤ects on the developing brain, and can be encountered by children. Al- though these other neurotoxic metals have not been as heavily studied as lead, there has been important research describing their e¤ects on the brain. The purpose of the present chapter is to review the neurotoxicology of lead poisoning as well as what is known concerning the neurtoxicology of mercury and manganese. The purpose of this review is to provide information that might be of some help in avoiding repeti- tion of the mistakes that were made in attempting to protect children from the dan- gers of lead poisoning.
    [Show full text]
  • Adverse Health Effects of Heavy Metals in Children
    TRAINING FOR HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS [Date …Place …Event …Sponsor …Organizer] ADVERSE HEALTH EFFECTS OF HEAVY METALS IN CHILDREN Children's Health and the Environment WHO Training Package for the Health Sector World Health Organization www.who.int/ceh October 2011 1 <<NOTE TO USER: Please add details of the date, time, place and sponsorship of the meeting for which you are using this presentation in the space indicated.>> <<NOTE TO USER: This is a large set of slides from which the presenter should select the most relevant ones to use in a specific presentation. These slides cover many facets of the problem. Present only those slides that apply most directly to the local situation in the region. Please replace the examples, data, pictures and case studies with ones that are relevant to your situation.>> <<NOTE TO USER: This slide set discusses routes of exposure, adverse health effects and case studies from environmental exposure to heavy metals, other than lead and mercury, please go to the modules on lead and mercury for more information on those. Please refer to other modules (e.g. water, neurodevelopment, biomonitoring, environmental and developmental origins of disease) for complementary information>> Children and heavy metals LEARNING OBJECTIVES To define the spectrum of heavy metals (others than lead and mercury) with adverse effects on human health To describe the epidemiology of adverse effects of heavy metals (Arsenic, Cadmium, Copper and Thallium) in children To describe sources and routes of exposure of children to those heavy metals To understand the mechanism and illustrate the clinical effects of heavy metals’ toxicity To discuss the strategy of prevention of heavy metals’ adverse effects 2 The scope of this module is to provide an overview of the public health impact, adverse health effects, epidemiology, mechanism of action and prevention of heavy metals (other than lead and mercury) toxicity in children.
    [Show full text]
  • Manganese Exposure and Toxicity
    tion Ef llu fec o ts P f & o l C a o n n r Mirmohammadi, J Pollut Eff Cont 2014, 2:2 t r u o o l Journal of Pollution Effects & Control J DOI: 10.4172/2375-4397.1000116 ISSN: 2375-4397 ReviewResearch Article Article OpenOpen Access Access Manganese Exposure and Toxicity Seyedtaghi Mirmohammadi* Department of Occupational Health, Faculty of Health, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Mazandaran, Sari, Iran Abstract One of the main essential elements for human is Manganese (Mn). Furthermore Mn is a row material for many king of ferrous foundry and there is a working exposure to Mn for workers in the workplaces. High exposure to Mn can result in increase in human tissues levels and neurological effects. Though, there should be some threshold limit value for Mn exposure related to adverse effects may occur and increase with higher exposures further than threshold limit. Conclusions from scientific literatures related to Mn toxicity revealed that this pollutant can effect on brain system and create some neurological disorders or neurological endpoints which measured in many of the occupational health assessments. Many researches have tried to show a relationship regards to biomarkers with neurological effects, such as neurological changes or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) changes have not been founded for Mn. More precise study need for Mn risk assessment for industrial pollution exposure and it will be used to recognize situations that may guide to understand Mn accumulation on brain and Mn metabolism in different exposed workers. Workplace evaluations for Mn will prepare valuable scientific information for the development of more scientifically sophisticated guidelines, regulations and recommendations for future study and for Mn occupational toxicity control and exposure prevention in the related workplaces.
    [Show full text]
  • The Deactivation of Industrial SCR Catalysts—A Short Review
    energies Review The Deactivation of Industrial SCR Catalysts—A Short Review Agnieszka Szymaszek *, Bogdan Samojeden * and Monika Motak * Faculty of Energy and Fuels, AGH University of Science and Technology, Al. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Kraków, Poland * Correspondence: [email protected] (A.S.); [email protected] (B.S.); [email protected] (M.M.) Received: 2 July 2020; Accepted: 24 July 2020; Published: 29 July 2020 Abstract: One of the most harmful compounds are nitrogen oxides. Currently, the common industrial method of nitrogen oxides emission control is selective catalytic reduction with ammonia (NH3-SCR). Among all of the recognized measures, NH3-SCR is the most effective and reaches even up to 90% of NOx conversion. The presence of the catalyst provides the surface for the reaction to proceed and lowers the activation energy. The optimum temperature of the process is in the range of 150–450 ◦C and the majority of the commercial installations utilize vanadium oxide (V2O5) supported on titanium oxide (TiO2) in a form of anatase, wash coated on a honeycomb monolith or deposited on a plate-like structures. In order to improve the mechanical stability and chemical resistance, the system is usually promoted with tungsten oxide (WO3) or molybdenum oxide (MoO3). The efficiency of the commercial V2O5-WO3-TiO2 catalyst of NH3-SCR, can be gradually decreased with time of its utilization. Apart from the physical deactivation, such as high temperature sintering, attrition and loss of the active elements by volatilization, the system can suffer from chemical poisoning. All of the presented deactivating agents pass for the most severe poisons of V2O5-WO3-TiO2.
    [Show full text]
  • Detection,Prevention and Management of Arsenicosis in India
    Detection,Prevention and Management of Arsenicosis in India A Field Guide Directorate General of Health Services Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Government of India 1 FOREWORD Arsenicosis has been known to be a health problem in some parts of our country. It occurs mainly by drinking Arsenic contaminated ground water and also through contaminated food chain or Industrial pollution for prolonged period. It results in skin manifestations such as Kerotosis, Melanosis and may also affect lungs, liver or lead to various types of cancers. The condition is preventable if measures are taken to provide safe drinking water to the community, promotion of nutrition and also if diagnosed early. With a view to formulate Guidelines for prevention, control and management of Arsenicosis, an Expert Group was constituted under my Chairmanship. After detailed round of discussions and subsequent exchange of communications, these Guidelines have now been finalized. I am sure that these Guidelines shall be very useful for sensitizing the Health Programme Managers and for training of Medical & Paramedical personnel in the field. I compliment the officials of the Nutrition & IDD Cell of the Dte. General of Health Services for facilitating in preparation and finalization of these Guidelines. It is hoped that these Guidelines shall be helpful in prevention and control of Arsenicosis in the affected areas of the country. Dr. Jagdish Prasad Director General of Health Services, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India. 2 CONTENTS 1. Preamble 2. Health Impacts of exposure 3. Detection and Management of Arsenicosis Goal and Objectives Components Linkages & Coordination mechanism Recording and Reporting Review and Evaluation 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Alberta Environment
    Chemical Fact Sheets Manganese, Mn CAS No. 7439-96-5 WHAT IS MANGANESE? Manganese is a gray-pink metal. USES Manganese is used in the manufacture of ceramics, matches, glass, dyes and welding rods. It is a component of steel, steel alloys, cast iron, superalloys & nonferrous alloys, as well as a chemical intermediate for high purity salts. Manganese is used as a purifying & scavenging agent in metal production. SOURCES Manganese is a naturally occurring substance found in many types of rock; it is ubiquitous in the environment and found in low levels in water air, soil, and food. It is commonly found in the environment as a result of its use in the manufacture of the above-noted materials. ENVIRONMENTAL LEVELS AND EXPOSURE Exposure to manganese might include: • Inhaling it in ambient air, particularly near industries involved in the manufacture of manganese-containing materials. Occupational exposure via inhalation is most common. Ambient air concentrations of manganese were not reported in 1997 or 1998 in Alberta. ENVIRONMENTAL FATE AND BEHAVIOUR • Manganese, as an aerosol, may dissolve upon contact with water on a time scale of a few minutes. TOXICITY • Manganese is an element considered essential to human health. • Inhalation of manganese compounds in aerosols or fine dusts may cause "metal fume fever”. MANGANESE Page 1 of 2 • Early symptoms of chronic manganese poisoning may include languor, sleepiness and weakness in the legs. Emotional disturbances such as uncontrollable laughter and a spastic gait with tendency to fall in walking are common in more advanced cases. • Chronic manganese poisoning is not a fatal disease.
    [Show full text]
  • N-Acetylcysteine in the Treatment of Human Arsenic Poisoning
    J Am Board Fam Pract: first published as 10.3122/jabfm.3.4.293 on 1 October 1990. Downloaded from N-Acetylcysteine In The Treatment Of Human Arsenic Poisoning Debra S. Martin, M.D., Stephen E. Willis, M.D., and David M. Cline, M.D. Abstract: A 32-year-old man was brought to the emergency department 5 1/2 hours after ingesting a potentiaIly lethal dose (900 mg) of sodium arsenate ant poison in a suicide attempt. The patient deteriorated progressively for 27 hours. After intramuscular dimercaprol and supportive measures failed to improve his condition, he was given N-acetylcysteine intravenously. The patient showed remarkable clinical improvement during the following 24 hours and was discharged from the hospital several days later. (J Am Board Fam Pract 1990; 3:293-6.) Arsenic has been used since medieval times, known use of intravenous NAC in a patient with both as medicine and poison. Although its me­ arsenic poisoning. dicinal use has declined, arsenic can still be found as an ingredient in certain homeopathic Case Report formulas, I which are available in some health A 32-year-old man was brought to the emer­ food stores. Arsenic also is present in high con­ gency department by ambulance 5 hours after centrations in many easily obtainable ant kill­ he ingested approximately 900 mg of sodium ers, and this source is responsible for most toxic arsenate - five times the lethal doseJ,6 - in a human ingestions. 2 Other sources include in­ suicide attempt. He was lethargic but arousable secticides, herbicides, and rodenticides. Com­ by voice and answered questions appropriately.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER E49 Heavy Metal Poisoning
    discussion with respect to the four most hazardous toxicants (arsenic, CHAPTER e49 cadmium, lead, and mercury). Arsenic, even at moderate levels of exposure, has been clearly linked with increased risks for cancer at a number of different tissue Heavy Metal Poisoning sites. These risks appear to be modified by smoking, folate and selenium status, and other factors. Evidence is also emerging that low-level arsenic may cause neurodevelopmental delays in children Howard Hu and possibly diabetes, but the evidence (particularly for diabetes) remains uneven. Metals pose a significant threat to health through low-level environ- Serious cadmium poisoning from the contamination of food mental as well as occupational exposures. One indication of their and water by mining effluents in Japan contributed to the 1946 CHAPTER e49 importance relative to other potential hazards is their ranking by outbreak of “itai-itai” (“ouch-ouch”) disease, so named because the U.S. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, which of cadmium-induced bone toxicity that led to painful bone frac- maintains an updated list of all hazards present in toxic waste sites tures. Modest exposures from environmental contamination have according to their prevalence and the severity of their toxicity. The recently been associated in some studies with a lower bone density, first, second, third, and seventh hazards on the list are heavy metals: a higher incidence of fractures, and a faster decline in height in lead, mercury, arsenic, and cadmium, respectively (http://www. both men and women, effects that may be related to cadmium’s atsdr.cdc.gov/cercla/07list.html) . Specific information pertaining calciuric effect on the kidney.
    [Show full text]
  • Drinking Water Health Advisory for Manganese Drinking Water Health Advisory for Manganese
    Drinking Water Health Advisory for Manganese Drinking Water Health Advisory for Manganese Prepared by: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water (4304T) Health and Ecological Criteria Division Washington, DC 20460 http://www.epa.gov/safewater/ EPA-822-R-04-003 January, 2004 January 2004 Acknowledgments This document was prepared under the U.S. EPA Contract Number 68-C-02-009. Lead Scientist, Julie Du, Ph.D., Health and Ecological Criteria Division, Office of Science and Technology, Office of Water, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. January 2004 CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................... ii FOREWORD................................................................ iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY......................................................1 1.0 INTRODUCTION .......................................................3 2.0 MANGANESE IN THE ENVIRONMENT ...................................3 2.1 Water...........................................................4 2.2 Soil.............................................................4 2.3 Air .............................................................5 2.4 Food............................................................5 2.5 Environmental Fate ................................................7 2.6 Summary ........................................................8 3.0 CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES ................................8 Organoleptic Properties...................................................8 4.0 TOXICOKINETICS .....................................................9
    [Show full text]