• University of Nevada Reno Geology and Uranium Content of Kiddle

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

• University of Nevada Reno Geology and Uranium Content of Kiddle • University of Nevada Reno Geology and Uranium Content of kiddle Tertiary Ash-Flow Tuffs in the Southern Nightingale Mountains and Northern Truckee Range, Washoe County, Nevada A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Geology by Julia Anne Benham ih July 1982 1 ■•its LIMRAnr The thesis of Julia Anne Benham is approved: Tkesi ' to /68 >% University of Nevada Reno July 1982 ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Mr. Harold F. Bonham, Jr. (Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology) suggested this area and topic. He and Dr. Donald C. Noble (University of Nevada-Reno) provided guidance and erudite discussions throughout the investigation, and, most importantly, taught me how to work with, map, and interpret ash-flow tuffs. Thank you. I acknowledge Dr. L. T. Larson, Dr. J. Lintz, Dr. J. Nelson, and Dr. E. Kersten for their help and guidance. My graduate education was supported by an H.E.W. Fellowship, and partial thesis funding was provided by the Mackay Research Fund. Dr. J. Firby was responsible in both areas of financial assistance and I sincerely thank him. Many thanks to M. Todd, who served as my Field Assis­ tant during the summer of 1981. Conoco, Inc. granted me the use of various equipment. Many fellow graduate students and friends provided interest and encouragement throughout the project. Thank you: Delores Cates, Nancy Wolverson, Judith Wright-Clark, Jaye Up De Graff, Peggy Hester McGrew, Fred and Kathy Strawson, Larry and Sue Amateis, Dick and Sue Nosker, John Brown, Glenn Gierzycki, Steve Park, Walter Crone, Doug Bruha, Don Hudson, and Becky Weimer-McMillion. Above all, my deepest and sincerest thanks to Michael R. Smith for moral and emotional support, stimulating discussions, and constructive critical review throughout the investigation. iii DEDICATION To: Elzena Posey Benhara, my Grandmother, (Winter, 1892 to Summer, 1981) tor whom this thesis is dedicated in most respectful, thoughtful and loving memory. IV ABSTRACT A composite thickness of 940 meters of nine, latitic to rhyolitic, Middle Tertiary ash-flow tuff cooling units, and 200 meters of the younger, overlying Chloropagus Formation are exposed in the southern Nightingale Mountains and northern Truckee Range, Washoe County, Nevada. The basal six Middle Tertiary ash-flow tuffs were emplaced between 29.6 and 27 million years ago, and the upper three units were emplaced between 23.0 and 20.5 million years ago. All nine ash-flows are hydrothermally altered to a minor degree. Uranium is associated with fault zones or the Middle Tertiary ash-flows, where it occurs in or near the basal porous glassy zone of the Tuff of Rattlesnake Canyon. The Chloropagus Formation consists of andesitic to basaltic lava flows with minor dacite, ash-flows, and thin sedimentary horizons. Structure throughout this area is due to the interaction between Basin and Range extension and Walker Lane strike slip movement. V TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGM E N T S ..................... ii DEDICATION .............................. iii ABSTRACT.............. iv ILLUSTRATIONS ........................ vii INTRODUCTION.......................... 1 GENERAL STATEMENT.............................. 1 LOCATION AND PHYSIOGRAPHIC SETTING ............ 3 METHODS AND PROCEDURES ........................ 5 PREVIOUS WORKERS . ............................. 6 THE ASH-FLOW TUFF COOLING UNIT CONCEPT ........ 7 REGIONAL GEOLOGY .................. 11 NATURE AND DISTRIBUTION OF ROCK TYPES.......... 11 TECTONIC SETTING .............................. 12 DESCRIPTIVE GEOLOGY ............ 15 GENERAL STATEMENT.............................. 15 MESOZOIC R O C K S .......... 16 Nightingale Sequence ........................ 16 Granitic Intrusive Rocks .................... 19 CENOZOIC ROCKS ................................ 22 Middle Tertiary Ash-Flow Tuffs .............. 22 General Statement.......................... 22 Ash-Flow Tuff Cooling Unit A .............. 28 Ash-Flow Tuff Cooling Unit B .............. 33 Age and Correlation of Ash-Flow Tuff Cooling Units A and B ................ 35 Tuff of Rattlesnake C a n y o n ................ 37 Coyote Spring T u f f ........................ 44 Tuff of Jackass S p r i n g .................... 49 Ash-Flow Tuff Cooling Unit E .............. 52 Age and Correlation of Ash-Flow Tuff Cooling Unit E ...................... 55 Ash-Flow Tuff Cooling Unit F .............. 55 Age and Correlation of Ash-Flow Tuff Cooling Unit F ...................... 57 Chimney Springs T u f f ...................... 58 VI Page Tuff of Gary's R i d g e ...................... 60 Andesite Dikes .............................. 63 Chloropagus Formation........................ 66 Andesite, Basalt, and Basaltic andesite. 69 Welded Dacite.............................. 70 Ash-Flow Tuffs ............................ 71 Miscellaneous Sedimentary Rocks............ 77 Emplacement of the Chloropagus Formation . 80 Basalt Flows ................................. 81 Surficial Deposits .......................... 82 STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY .............. 84 GENERAL......................................... 84 LOCAL STRUCTURE................................ 84 Regional Tilting ............................ 85 Unconformities .............................. 86 F a u l t s ....................................... 87 ECONOMIC GEOLOGY .................. 92 GENERAL......................................... 92 URANIUM MINERALIZATION ........................ 92 OTHER PROSPECTS AND MINERALIZATION ............ 96 Crosby Mine.................................. 97 Other Prospects.............................. 98 GEOLOGIC HISTORY .................. 100 RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS................ 104 REFERENCES CITED .................. 107 % vii ILLUSTRATIONS Figures Page 1 Index M a p .................... 2 2 Generalized distribution of 34 to 17 million year old silicic ash-flow tuffs in western Nevada...................... 24 3 Photograph of the southwest facing escarpment of the southern Nightingale Mountains . 25 4 Stratigraphic column of Middle Tertiary ash- flow tuff cooling units in the southern Nightingale Mountains and northern Truckee Range, Nevada .................... 26 5 Histograms of phenocryst mineralogy of Middle Tertiary ash-flow tuffs in the southern Nightingale Mountains and northern Truckee Range, Nevada .................. 27 6 Correlation chart for Middle Tertiary ash-flow T u f f s ................................ 29 7 Photograph of an andesite dike............ 65 8 Schematic, generalized stratigraphic section of the Chloropagus Formation in the northern Truckee Range and southern Nightingale Mountains, Nevada ........ 68 9 Histograms showing phenocryst mineralogy of ash-flow tuffs within the Chloropagus Formation in the northern Truckee Range, Nevada........................ 73 10 Photographs of the basal vitrophyre and densely welded zone of the upper ash-flow tuff cooling unit (Tcafb) within the Chloropagus Formation in the northern Truckee Range 76 Plates 1 Geology of the southern Nightingale Mountains and northern Truckee Range, Washoe County, Nevada.............................. in pocket 2 Interpretive Cross Sections for the southern Nightingale Mountains and northern Truckee Range, Washoe County, Nevada........ in pocket i 1 INTRODUCTION GENERAL STATEMENT The ultimate purpose of this study is to determine and interpret the stratigraphy and map the extent of uranium bearing ash-flow tuff cooling units in the southern Nightin­ gale Mountains and northern Truckee Range, Nevada (Figure 1). Additional objectives of this study include: determination not only of the Middle Tertiary ash-flow tuff stratigraphy, but that of younger volcanic rocks as well; definition of the uranium—rich ash—flow tuff cooling units and the nature of any uranium mineralization; discussion of possible models relating welding, crystallization, weathering and erosion of these units to the formation of uranium deposits; and, finally, to hypothesize a possible tectonic regime responsi­ ble for this geologic setting. This thesis consists of a geologic map (1:12,000) (Plate 1), interpretive cross sections (Plate 2), and descriptions, based on hand and petrographic analysis, of the various ash-flow tuff cooling units and all other rock units encountered in the thesis area. This paper utilizes and follows the terminology of Smith (1960) and Ross and Smith (1960); those papers which best define, describe and explain ash-flow tuffs and the cooling unit concept. CALIFORNIA 3 LOCATION AND PHYSIOGRAPHIC SETTING Situated along the southeastern margin of Winnemucca Dry Lake, near the junction of Washoe, Pershing, and Churchill Counties, this study area is in the southern Nightingale Mountains and northern Truckee Range, Washoe County, Nevada (Figure 1). The area mapped, approximately 15 square miles (24 sq. km.), lies north of the town of Nixon, within the northeast quarter of the U.S.G.S. fifteen minute quadrangle map of Nixon, Nevada; in parts or all of: sections 33, 34 and 35, T.25N., R.24E. and sections 2, 3, 4, 9, 10, 11, 14, 15, 16, 17, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34 and 35, T.24N., R.24E., Mount Diablo Base and Meridian (Plate 1). The Nightingale Mountains and northern Truckee Range are an essentially continuous north-south trending mountain block which rises abruptly on its western side from the val­ ley occupied by Winnemucca Dry Lake (Figure 1). Elevations range from 5,840 ft (1,780 m) in the southern Nightingale Mountains, to slightly less than 4,000 ft (1,220 m), on the alluvial plain proximal
Recommended publications
  • Winnemucca District Proposed Resource Management Plan and Final Environmental Impact Statement DOI-BLM-NV-W000-2010-0001-EIS
    BLM Winnemucca District Proposed Resource Management Plan and Final Environmental Impact Statement DOI-BLM-NV-W000-2010-0001-EIS Volume 2: Chapters 3, 4 Winnemucca District, Nevada District, Winnemucca August 2013 Winnemucca MISSION STATEMENT To sustain the health, diversity, and productivity of the public lands for the use and enjoyment of present and future generations. BLM/NV/WN/ES/13-11+1793 Volume 2 of 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 3. AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT ............................................................................................. 3-1 3.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Resources ....................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2.1 Air Quality ............................................................................................ 3-2 3.2.2 Geology ............................................................................................. 3-14 3.2.3 Soil Resources .................................................................................. 3-18 3.2.4 Water Resources ............................................................................... 3-22 3.2.5 Vegetation – General ......................................................................... 3-36 3.2.6 Vegetation – Forest/Woodland Products ........................................... 3-41 3.2.7 Vegetation – Invasive and Noxious Species ...................................... 3-42 3.2.8 Vegetation
    [Show full text]
  • Field Trip No.2 Road-Log Brady's Hot Springs, Desert
    FIELD TRIP NO.2 ROAD-LOG BRADY'S HOT SPRINGS, DESERT PEAK and RYE PATCH (Humboldt House) September 26, 2002 Geothermal Resources Council 2002 Annual Meeting September 22 - 25, 2002 Reno Hilton Hotel & Casino Reno, Nevada 2002 GRC Field Trip No.2 Reno - Brady's - Desert Peak - Rye Patch (Humboldt House) MILE DESCRIPTION o Leave Hilton Hotel proceed to 395 north to 1-80 East 6.5 Vista Exit. This is the eastern-most part of the Truckee Meadows. The U. S. Corps of Engineers deepened the river channel in this area to lessen flood damage and to lower the watertable. It apparently didn't work as planned as evidenced by the flood of January 1997. Ahead is the canyon that the Truckee River has cut through the Virginia and the Pah Rah Ranges. The Pah Rah Range is north of the river and the Virginia Range is to the south. In a very general way, this range is a large syncline. At both ends of the canyon , metamorphosed volcanic and sed imentary rocks of the Triassic and/or Jurassic Peavine Sequence are exposed. Progressively younger volcanic rocks are found towards the central portions of the Virginia Range near the freeway. The volcanic rocks range in composition from basalt to rhyolite and their origin varies from intrusive plugs to ash-flow tuffs and extensive lava flows. The age of the volcanic rocks ranges from Oligocene (27 m.y., million years) to Pleistocene (3 m.y.). The Truckee River existed before warping and faulting uplifted the Virginia Range. As uplifting took place, the river apparently down cut at the same rate , and no deep lake was formed in the Truckee Meadows area where Reno and Sparks are located.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Element Text Only
    Department of Community Development Master Plan Conservation Element Post Office Box 11130, Reno, NV 89520-0027 – 1001 E. Ninth St., Reno, NV 89512 Telephone: 775.328.6100 – Fax: 775.328.6133 – www.washoecounty.us/comdev/ Department of Community Development Master Plan Conservation Element This document is one of a series that, as adopted, constitutes a part of the Master Plan for Washoe County, Nevada. This document is available for $10.00 from the Washoe County Department of Community Development. If you have a copy of the Washoe County Master Plan notebook, please place this behind the Conservation Element tab. The Washoe County Master Plan can also be found on our department’s website. This printing of the Conservation Element reflects amendments adopted as part of Comprehensive Plan amendment Case Number CP10-002. In accordance with Article 820 of the Washoe County Development Code, this amendment was adopted by Resolution Number 10-11 of the Washoe County Planning Commission on May 20, 2010, by the Washoe County Commission on July 13, 2010, and found in conformance with the Truckee Meadows Regional Plan by the Regional Planning Commission on September 8, 2010. The adopting resolution was signed by the Washoe County Commission Chairman on September 9, 2010. SECOND PRINTING, SEPTEMBER 2010 Washoe County Master Plan CONSERVATION ELEMENT This page intentionally left blank. September 9, 2010 Page ii Washoe County Master Plan CONSERVATION ELEMENT Contents Page Acknowledgments ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • QUATERNARY FAULT MAP of the RENO 1X2 QUADRANGLE John W
    QUATERNARY FAULT MAP OF THE RENO 1x2 QUADRANGLE John W. Bell Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology University of Nevada--Reno Reno, Nevada 89557 USGS CONTRACT NO. 14-08-0001-18375 Supported by the EARTHQUAKE HAZARDS REDUCTION PROGRAM OPEN-FILE NO. 81-982 U.S. Geological Survey OPEN FILE REPORT This report was prepared under contract to the U.S. Geological Survey and has not been reviewed for conformity with USGS editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature. Opinions and conclusions expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of the USGS. Any use of trade names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the USGS. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION 1 LOCATION 1 PREVIOUS WORK - 1 APPROACH 1 INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE 4 LITERATURE COMPILATION 4 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS 6 FIELD INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE 8 Selection of Field Reconnaissance Sites 8 Field Methods 8 Trenching and ^C sites 9 Stratigraphic Dating Methods 9 Recency of Fault Movement Categories 13 RESULTS 17 REGIONAL TECTONICS 17 SEISMICITY AND HISTORIC SURFACE RUPTURES 20 DESCRIPTION OF FAULTING 32 Area _A: The Sierra Nevada Frontal Fault Zone 32 Area JB: Peavine Mountain and Nor t hweste r n Valleys Area 35 Area JC: Pyramid Lake Segment of the Walker Lane 36 Area j): Olinghouse Fault Zone 38 Area _E_: Virginia Range and Eastern Part of Truckee Meadows 39 Area J?: Carson Lineament 39 Area £: Pine Nut Mountains Area 42 Area H.: Truckee Range and Hot Springs Mountains Area 43 Area JL: Dead Came1, Desert Mountains, and Carson Lake Area 44 Area J_: Mason Valley - Weber Reservoir Area 47 Area K.: Carson Sink Area 47 Area _L: Stillwater Range - Sand Springs^ Range - Fair view Peak - Dixie Valley Area.
    [Show full text]
  • TOTAL-INTENSITY MAGNETIC-ANOMALY MAP of the RENO 1° by 2° QUADRANGLE, NEVADA and CALIFORNIA by John D
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR TO ACCOMPANY MAP M~ 2154-C U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY TOTAL-INTENSITY MAGNETIC-ANOMALY MAP OF THE RENO 1° by 2° QUADRANGLE, NEVADA AND CALIFORNIA By John D. Hendricks INTRODUCTION Reference Field between 1965 and 1980, and the International Geomagnetic Reference Field of 1980 after 1980 (Peddie 1982a and b). The residual anomaly grids were then projected to the This map is part of a folio of maps of the Lambert conic confonnal projection (standard parallels at 33° N Reno 1° by 2° quadrangle, Nevada and California, and 45° N and central meridian at 117° W) on a 1-km grK prepared under the Conterminous United States A new technique called "chessboard", developed by Mineral Assessment Program. Each product is Cordell (1985), was used to drape data taken at constant designated by a different letter symbol, starting with elevation onto a surface 305 m (1,000 ft) above ground. Data A, in the U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous originally observed on a level surface were continued onto ten Held Studies Map MF-2154 foHo. levels by the conventional level-to-level continuation using the Fast Fourier Transform (computer program by Hildenbrand, AEROMAGNETIC DATA AND REDUCTION 1983). Two levels were selected slightly both above thi highest TECHNIQUES and below the lowest point of the datum surface. The wnaining six levels were equally spaced (internal <340 m) between these maximum and minimum points. To remove short-wavelength Data used in compilation of this map were noise enhanced by the downward continuation process, a low- collected during two separate surveys (U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • United States
    CONTACT-METAMORPHIC TUNGSTEN DEPOSITS OF THE UNITED STATES. By FRANK L. HESS and ESPER S. LARSEN. INTRODUCTION. Production of tungsten ores in the United States. For years the United States has been not only one of the largest producers of tung­ sten concentrates but the largest producer of scheelite and ferberite, and in 1918 it was by far the largest producer of tungsten concen­ trates from contact-metamorphic deposits. Of the 5,061 short tons of concentrates carrying 60 per cent of tungsten trioxide (WO3) produced in this country in 1918, 2,734 tons was scheelite, and of this scheelite 1,427 tons was obtained from contact-metamorphic de- posits, a quantity equaled by the total output of only a few other countries. The quantity would probably have been increased ma­ terially had not the price of tungsten fallen after the signing of the armistice. Our total output of tungsten in 1918 was, however, less than half the output of wolframite from the Chinese placers (including a small quantity from veins), probably equivalent to more than 11,200 tons of concentrates carrying 60 per cent of tungsten trioxide. Definition. Contact-metamorphic tungsten deposits have been formed through the combined action of the heat and solutions ema­ nating from a cooling intrusive granitic magma on limestones and the other intruded rocks and to a less extent on the granitic rock itself, by which the rocks are altered to or replaced by an aggregate of garnet, epidote, diopside, quartz, calcite, scheelite, and other minerals. Most deposits of this class are at or very near the contacts, and they clearly represent replacement of the limestones and other rocks.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Nevada Reno Geology of a Portion of the Nightingale
    University of Nevada Reno Geology of a Portion of the Nightingale and Truckee Ranges, Washoe and Pershing Counties, Nevada A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Geology by Vijai Narain Rai June 1968 The thesis of Vijai Narain Rai is approved University of Nevada Reno June 1968 i Table of Contents ■Page Abstract ...................................... \ Introduction ............................................... 4 Location and Accessibility ............................... 4 The Object of this Investigation.......................... 4 Methods of Investigation..................... 4 Previous Investigation .................................. 6 Climate and Vegetation ..... ...................... 7 Acknowledgement................................... 9 Lithologic Units - Sedimentary Rocks Upper Triassic-Lower Jurassic............................. 11 Correlation of the Mesozoic Sediments . ............ 14 Igneous Rocks (Plutonic) .................................. 17 Middle Jurassic-Early Cretaceous ....................... 17 Middle Cretaceous......................................... 18 Volcanic R o c k s ......... .. ............................... 22 Early M i o c e n e ........................... 22 Late Miocene-Pliestocene .................................. 23 Pliocene-Pleistocene ........................... 24 Quaternary Deposits ...................................... 26 S t r u c t u r e ................................ 27 Economic Geology .........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Origin of Place Names-Nevada
    Chapter X Lincoln County I SHEEP: 46shzp) 36 A range, extending north from Clark County into Lincoln County. #So named for wild sheep. vw36 40 SILVER CANYON: (sil ver) A range of mountains m Pnhranagat Valley, #So named for the prevailing ore. 28 STINE: (st&) A town, pop,, 10; alt., ii,O46,& a station on the Union Pacific Railroad, south of Caliente. dt'*- TIMPAHUTE: (tim pa ut) A range in th western part of the county, south of Worthington and Golden Gate ranges." Shoshone name meaning "rock water people ,110 d 28 27 URSINE: (&'sin) A town, pope, 63; alto,5,500; 13 mi. northeast of Pioche, in a valley of the same name. WHITE ROCK. (h&t Gk)36 A range east of Wilson Creek Range, extending into Utah,4o and a peak in the range.37 #So nvaed for the color of the rock formation in the vicinity, WILSON CREEK RANGE AND WILSON PEAK: (&'s&) 36 Wilson Creek Range is in the northeaste n part of the county and the peak is in the central part of the rangeO3? Named for Charles Wilson, one of the early county commissioners 1 WORTHIMGTON: (Ath'zng t&) 36 A range extending northwest to southeast in the northwester corner of Lincoln County; A peak in the northwest part of the range," a mining district(als0 cal d Freiberg) at the north e~clof the mountains on their east flanke" Alt,8,400 40e CHAPTER XI LYON COUNTY ANTELOPE: (G't; A y#ley extending from California into both Douglas and Lyon counties.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Groundwater Model Development for the Fernley/Wadsworth Hydrographic Basins, Nevada
    Regional Groundwater Model Development for the Fernley/Wadsworth Hydrographic Basins, Nevada e g n a R h T a ru R ck h ee a P R an ge Virg inia Ra nge Brian Epstein Greg Pohll Daniel Bansah Anna Makowski February 2007 DHS Publication No. 41229 Prepared by Desert Research Institute, Nevada System of Higher Education Prepared for U.S. Bureau of Reclamation ABSTRACT The Fernley/Wadsworth area is located in western Nevada, about 55 kilometers (34 miles) east of the cities of Reno and Sparks. The Truckee River flows from Lake Tahoe, through Reno/Sparks, and terminates in Pyramid Lake. Derby Dam diverts Truckee River water into the Truckee Canal, bringing water into the Fernley and Dodge Flat hydrographic basins. Fernley and Wadsworth are traditionally agricultural communities; however, as the population grows, agricultural land is decreasing. Less irrigated land decreases the amount of irrigation water available to recharge the basin. Municipal and domestic water usage and the amount of groundwater pumped from the aquifer are increasing with the population. The objective of this study is to develop a predictive groundwater model that can be used to assess water supply scenarios regarding expected production well yield in the Wadsworth area, groundwater supply in the Fernley area with changes in diversions to the Truckee Canal, and the potential impacts of additional pumping on Truckee River flows. Both a steady-state and a transient model were constructed. Two transient simulations were performed: a six-year (2000 to 2005) calibration simulation, and a 20-year (2006 to 2025) predictive simulation that includes projected Fernley and Wadsworth groundwater pumping.
    [Show full text]