DOCSLIB.ORG

Flynn's Taxonomy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Flynn's Taxonomy Flynn’s Taxonomy • Proposed by Michael Flynn in 1966 • SISD – single instruction, single data • Traditional uniprocessor CSE 560 • SIMD – single instruction, multiple data Computer Systems Architecture • Execute the same instruction on many data elements • Vector machines, graphics engines • MIMD – multiple instruction, multiple data Multiprocessors • Each processor executes its own instructions • Multicores are all built this way • SPMD – single program, multiple data (extension proposed by Frederica Darema) • MIMD machine, each node is executing the same code • MISD – multiple instruction, single data • Systolic array 1 2 1 2 Shared-Memory Multiprocessors Distributed-Memory Multiprocessors Conceptual model …but systems actually look more like this • Memory is physically distributed • The shared-memory abstraction • Previously covered common address space and cache coherence • Familiar and feels natural to programmers • Scales to about 10s to 100 processors • Life would be easy if systems actually looked like this… • When we want to scale up to 1000s (or millions) of cores • Separate address spaces • Arbitrary interconnect – custom, LAN, WAN P0 P1 P2 P3 P0 P1 P2 P3 Memory $ M0 $ M1 $ M2 $ M3 Router/interface Router/interface Router/interface Router/interface 3 Interconnect 4 3 4 Connect Processors via Network Programming Models Cluster approach • The interconnect is a Local-Area Network (LAN) TCP/IP message delivery • Off-the-shelf processors (each of which is a multicore) • • IP addresses • Connect using off-the-shelf networking technology • Network handles routing, etc. • Leverages existing components inexpensive to design • Socket-based programming • Cloud service providers do this a lot! • Higher-level abstractions • Amazon Web Services (AWS) • Distributed shared memory • Microsoft Azure • Works but performs poorly – latency again • Scales up very easily • Map-Reduce • 1000s of nodes • Hadoop, etc. • Long latency to move data • Streaming data • Traverse network for one • Apache Storm, etc. cache line? Nope! • Explicit message passing (more later) 5 6 5 6 Virtualization Cluster Interconnect Sharing the processor cores Ethernet Switches • VM technology allows multiple virtual machines to run on a • 1st tier are top-of-rack (ToR) switches single physical machine • Additional tiers connect racks, top tier talks to outside world • Hypervisor schedules VMs onto physical cores • Lots of redundant paths 7 8 7 8 Can we fix latency issue? Custom Interconnect Cluster approach Known topology, trusted environment • TCP/IP network technology is dominant • Routing is easier Still • But is it needed? Or just readily available? • Security is easier TCP/IP Custom interconnect 9 10 9 10 Interconnect Topologies Cray Dragonfly • Mesh Custom Design for Supercomputers Torus (wraparound mesh) • • Big applications with lots of parallelism • Low-overhead message • All tiers in one switch (Aries) delivery • Routing is straightforward • Move along row to destination column • Move along column to destination • Forwarding can be fast • Old-school: store-and- forward • Modern: cut-through 11 12 11 12 Cray Dragonfly Network Back to Standardized Interconnect Mesh with additional links Issue with Ethernet is latency • Protocol processing at endpoints Still • Store-and-forward routing TCP/IP Infiniband interconnect 13 14 13 14 Infiniband Network Programming Paradigm • Standardized technology Message Passing • Multiple vendors • MPI (Message Passing Interface) is de facto standard • Equipment works together • Used by almost all supercomputing applications • Competition • Not trying to be the “Internet” • Focus on low latency interconnect needs • Minimize protocol processing • E.g., easier routing, simpler security model • Fast forwarding • Cut-through packet delivery • Remote Direct Memory Access (RDMA) • Supports single-ended messaging 15 16 15 16 More MPI Flynn’s Taxonomy • Proposed by Michael Flynn in 1966 MPI capabilities beyond just send() and rcve() • SISD – single instruction, single data • One-sided communication: get() and put() • Traditional uniprocessor • Collective operations • SIMD – single instruction, multiple data • Execute the same instruction on many data elements • Vector machines, graphics engines • MIMD – multiple instruction, multiple data • Each processor executes its own instructions • Multicores are all built this way • SPMD – single program, multiple data (extension proposed by Frederica Darema) • MIMD machine, each node is executing the same code • MISD – multiple instruction, single data • Systolic array 17 18 17 18 SIMD Instructions Graphics Engines Heterogeneous Multiprocessor • Many processing elements (PE), many threads per PE • Collections of threads execute in lock-step (SIMD-like) • Hide latency to memory by switching threads By Decora at English Wikipedia, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=30547549 19 20 19 20 Flynn’s Taxonomy Systolic Arrays • Proposed by Michael Flynn in 1966 H.T. Kung, “Why Systolic Architectures?,” Computer, 1982 • SISD – single instruction, single data • Traditional uniprocessor • SIMD – single instruction, multiple data • Execute the same instruction on many data elements • Vector machines, graphics engines • MIMD – multiple instruction, multiple data • Each processor executes its own instructions • Multicores are all built this way • SPMD – single program, multiple data (extension proposed by Frederica Darema) • MIMD machine, each node is executing the same code • MISD – multiple instruction, single data • Systolic array 21 22 21 22 Systolic Arrays Tensor Processing Unit Purpose-built design for specific problem • Custom PE, replicated many times • E.g., array of MA (multiply-accumulate) units for FIR filter • RNA folding [Jacob et al. 2010] 23 24 23 24 Tensor Processing Unit Flynn’s Taxonomy • Proposed by Michael Flynn in 1966 • SISD – single instruction, single data • Traditional uniprocessor • SIMD – single instruction, multiple data • Execute the same instruction on many data elements • Vector machines, graphics engines • MIMD – multiple instruction, multiple data • Each processor executes its own instructions • Multicores are all built this way • SPMD – single program, multiple data (extension proposed by Frederica Darema) • MIMD machine, each node is executing the same code • MISD – multiple instruction, single data • Systolic array 25 26 25 26.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2.5 Classification of Parallel Computers
    52 // Architectures 2.5 Classification of Parallel Computers 2.5 Classification of Parallel Computers 2.5.1 Granularity In parallel computing, granularity means the amount of computation in relation to communication or synchronisation Periods of computation are typically separated from periods of communication by synchronization events. • fine level (same operations with different data) ◦ vector processors ◦ instruction level parallelism ◦ fine-grain parallelism: – Relatively small amounts of computational work are done between communication events – Low computation to communication ratio – Facilitates load balancing 53 // Architectures 2.5 Classification of Parallel Computers – Implies high communication overhead and less opportunity for per- formance enhancement – If granularity is too fine it is possible that the overhead required for communications and synchronization between tasks takes longer than the computation. • operation level (different operations simultaneously) • problem level (independent subtasks) ◦ coarse-grain parallelism: – Relatively large amounts of computational work are done between communication/synchronization events – High computation to communication ratio – Implies more opportunity for performance increase – Harder to load balance efficiently 54 // Architectures 2.5 Classification of Parallel Computers 2.5.2 Hardware: Pipelining (was used in supercomputers, e.g. Cray-1) In N elements in pipeline and for 8 element L clock cycles =) for calculation it would take L + N cycles; without pipeline L ∗ N cycles Example of good code for pipelineing: §doi =1 ,k ¤ z ( i ) =x ( i ) +y ( i ) end do ¦ 55 // Architectures 2.5 Classification of Parallel Computers Vector processors, fast vector operations (operations on arrays). Previous example good also for vector processor (vector addition) , but, e.g. recursion – hard to optimise for vector processors Example: IntelMMX – simple vector processor.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5 Multiprocessors and Thread-Level Parallelism
    Computer Architecture A Quantitative Approach, Fifth Edition Chapter 5 Multiprocessors and Thread-Level Parallelism Copyright © 2012, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Contents 1. Introduction 2. Centralized SMA – shared memory architecture 3. Performance of SMA 4. DMA – distributed memory architecture 5. Synchronization 6. Models of Consistency Copyright © 2012, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 2 1. Introduction. Why multiprocessors? Need for more computing power Data intensive applications Utility computing requires powerful processors Several ways to increase processor performance Increased clock rate limited ability Architectural ILP, CPI – increasingly more difficult Multi-processor, multi-core systems more feasible based on current technologies Advantages of multiprocessors and multi-core Replication rather than unique design. Copyright © 2012, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 3 Introduction Multiprocessor types Symmetric multiprocessors (SMP) Share single memory with uniform memory access/latency (UMA) Small number of cores Distributed shared memory (DSM) Memory distributed among processors. Non-uniform memory access/latency (NUMA) Processors connected via direct (switched) and non-direct (multi- hop) interconnection networks Copyright © 2012, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 4 Important ideas Technology drives the solutions. Multi-cores have altered the game!! Thread-level parallelism (TLP) vs ILP. Computing and communication deeply intertwined. Write serialization exploits broadcast communication
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5 Thread-Level Parallelism
    Chapter 5 Thread-Level Parallelism Instructor: Josep Torrellas CS433 Copyright Josep Torrellas 1999, 2001, 2002, 2013 1 Progress Towards Multiprocessors + Rate of speed growth in uniprocessors saturated + Wide-issue processors are very complex + Wide-issue processors consume a lot of power + Steady progress in parallel software : the major obstacle to parallel processing 2 Flynn’s Classification of Parallel Architectures According to the parallelism in I and D stream • Single I stream , single D stream (SISD): uniprocessor • Single I stream , multiple D streams(SIMD) : same I executed by multiple processors using diff D – Each processor has its own data memory – There is a single control processor that sends the same I to all processors – These processors are usually special purpose 3 • Multiple I streams, single D stream (MISD) : no commercial machine • Multiple I streams, multiple D streams (MIMD) – Each processor fetches its own instructions and operates on its own data – Architecture of choice for general purpose mps – Flexible: can be used in single user mode or multiprogrammed – Use of the shelf µprocessors 4 MIMD Machines 1. Centralized shared memory architectures – Small #’s of processors (≈ up to 16-32) – Processors share a centralized memory – Usually connected in a bus – Also called UMA machines ( Uniform Memory Access) 2. Machines w/physically distributed memory – Support many processors – Memory distributed among processors – Scales the mem bandwidth if most of the accesses are to local mem 5 Figure 5.1 6 Figure 5.2 7 2. Machines w/physically distributed memory (cont) – Also reduces the memory latency – Of course interprocessor communication is more costly and complex – Often each node is a cluster (bus based multiprocessor) – 2 types, depending on method used for interprocessor communication: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • SIMD Extensions
    SIMD Extensions PDF generated using the open source mwlib toolkit. See http://code.pediapress.com/ for more information. PDF generated at: Sat, 12 May 2012 17:14:46 UTC Contents Articles SIMD 1 MMX (instruction set) 6 3DNow! 8 Streaming SIMD Extensions 12 SSE2 16 SSE3 18 SSSE3 20 SSE4 22 SSE5 26 Advanced Vector Extensions 28 CVT16 instruction set 31 XOP instruction set 31 References Article Sources and Contributors 33 Image Sources, Licenses and Contributors 34 Article Licenses License 35 SIMD 1 SIMD Single instruction Multiple instruction Single data SISD MISD Multiple data SIMD MIMD Single instruction, multiple data (SIMD), is a class of parallel computers in Flynn's taxonomy. It describes computers with multiple processing elements that perform the same operation on multiple data simultaneously. Thus, such machines exploit data level parallelism. History The first use of SIMD instructions was in vector supercomputers of the early 1970s such as the CDC Star-100 and the Texas Instruments ASC, which could operate on a vector of data with a single instruction. Vector processing was especially popularized by Cray in the 1970s and 1980s. Vector-processing architectures are now considered separate from SIMD machines, based on the fact that vector machines processed the vectors one word at a time through pipelined processors (though still based on a single instruction), whereas modern SIMD machines process all elements of the vector simultaneously.[1] The first era of modern SIMD machines was characterized by massively parallel processing-style supercomputers such as the Thinking Machines CM-1 and CM-2. These machines had many limited-functionality processors that would work in parallel.
    [Show full text]
  • Computer Hardware Architecture Lecture 4
    Computer Hardware Architecture Lecture 4 Manfred Liebmann Technische Universit¨atM¨unchen Chair of Optimal Control Center for Mathematical Sciences, M17 [email protected] November 10, 2015 Manfred Liebmann November 10, 2015 Reading List • Pacheco - An Introduction to Parallel Programming (Chapter 1 - 2) { Introduction to computer hardware architecture from the parallel programming angle • Hennessy-Patterson - Computer Architecture - A Quantitative Approach { Reference book for computer hardware architecture All books are available on the Moodle platform! Computer Hardware Architecture 1 Manfred Liebmann November 10, 2015 UMA Architecture Figure 1: A uniform memory access (UMA) multicore system Access times to main memory is the same for all cores in the system! Computer Hardware Architecture 2 Manfred Liebmann November 10, 2015 NUMA Architecture Figure 2: A nonuniform memory access (UMA) multicore system Access times to main memory differs form core to core depending on the proximity of the main memory. This architecture is often used in dual and quad socket servers, due to improved memory bandwidth. Computer Hardware Architecture 3 Manfred Liebmann November 10, 2015 Cache Coherence Figure 3: A shared memory system with two cores and two caches What happens if the same data element z1 is manipulated in two different caches? The hardware enforces cache coherence, i.e. consistency between the caches. Expensive! Computer Hardware Architecture 4 Manfred Liebmann November 10, 2015 False Sharing The cache coherence protocol works on the granularity of a cache line. If two threads manipulate different element within a single cache line, the cache coherency protocol is activated to ensure consistency, even if every thread is only manipulating its own data.
    [Show full text]
  • CS650 Computer Architecture Lecture 10 Introduction to Multiprocessors
    NJIT Computer Science Dept CS650 Computer Architecture CS650 Computer Architecture Lecture 10 Introduction to Multiprocessors and PC Clustering Andrew Sohn Computer Science Department New Jersey Institute of Technology Lecture 10: Intro to Multiprocessors/Clustering 1/15 12/7/2003 A. Sohn NJIT Computer Science Dept CS650 Computer Architecture Key Issues Run PhotoShop on 1 PC or N PCs Programmability • How to program a bunch of PCs viewed as a single logical machine. Performance Scalability - Speedup • Run PhotoShop on 1 PC (forget the specs of this PC) • Run PhotoShop on N PCs • Will it run faster on N PCs? Speedup = ? Lecture 10: Intro to Multiprocessors/Clustering 2/15 12/7/2003 A. Sohn NJIT Computer Science Dept CS650 Computer Architecture Types of Multiprocessors Key: Data and Instruction Single Instruction Single Data (SISD) • Intel processors, AMD processors Single Instruction Multiple Data (SIMD) • Array processor • Pentium MMX feature Multiple Instruction Single Data (MISD) • Systolic array • Special purpose machines Multiple Instruction Multiple Data (MIMD) • Typical multiprocessors (Sun, SGI, Cray,...) Single Program Multiple Data (SPMD) • Programming model Lecture 10: Intro to Multiprocessors/Clustering 3/15 12/7/2003 A. Sohn NJIT Computer Science Dept CS650 Computer Architecture Shared-Memory Multiprocessor Processor Prcessor Prcessor Interconnection network Main Memory Storage I/O Lecture 10: Intro to Multiprocessors/Clustering 4/15 12/7/2003 A. Sohn NJIT Computer Science Dept CS650 Computer Architecture Distributed-Memory Multiprocessor Processor Processor Processor IO/S MM IO/S MM IO/S MM Interconnection network IO/S MM IO/S MM IO/S MM Processor Processor Processor Lecture 10: Intro to Multiprocessors/Clustering 5/15 12/7/2003 A.
    [Show full text]
  • Trafficdb: HERE's High Performance Shared-Memory Data Store
    TrafficDB: HERE’s High Performance Shared-Memory Data Store Ricardo Fernandes Piotr Zaczkowski Bernd Gottler¨ HERE Global B.V. HERE Global B.V. HERE Global B.V. [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Conor Ettinoffe Anis Moussa HERE Global B.V. HERE Global B.V. conor.ettinoff[email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT HERE's traffic-aware services enable route planning and traf- fic visualisation on web, mobile and connected car appli- cations. These services process thousands of requests per second and require efficient ways to access the information needed to provide a timely response to end-users. The char- acteristics of road traffic information and these traffic-aware services require storage solutions with specific performance features. A route planning application utilising traffic con- gestion information to calculate the optimal route from an origin to a destination might hit a database with millions of queries per second. However, existing storage solutions are not prepared to handle such volumes of concurrent read Figure 1: HERE Location Cloud is accessible world- operations, as well as to provide the desired vertical scalabil- wide from web-based applications, mobile devices ity. This paper presents TrafficDB, a shared-memory data and connected cars. store, designed to provide high rates of read operations, en- abling applications to directly access the data from memory. Our evaluation demonstrates that TrafficDB handles mil- HERE is a leader in mapping and location-based services, lions of read operations and provides near-linear scalability providing fresh and highly accurate traffic information to- on multi-core machines, where additional processes can be gether with advanced route planning and navigation tech- spawned to increase the systems' throughput without a no- nologies that helps drivers reach their destination in the ticeable impact on the latency of querying the data store.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Gpus, CUDA and Opencl
    An Introduction to GPUs, CUDA and OpenCL Bryan Catanzaro, NVIDIA Research Overview ¡ Heterogeneous parallel computing ¡ The CUDA and OpenCL programming models ¡ Writing efficient CUDA code ¡ Thrust: making CUDA C++ productive 2/54 Heterogeneous Parallel Computing Latency-Optimized Throughput- CPU Optimized GPU Fast Serial Scalable Parallel Processing Processing 3/54 Why do we need heterogeneity? ¡ Why not just use latency optimized processors? § Once you decide to go parallel, why not go all the way § And reap more benefits ¡ For many applications, throughput optimized processors are more efficient: faster and use less power § Advantages can be fairly significant 4/54 Why Heterogeneity? ¡ Different goals produce different designs § Throughput optimized: assume work load is highly parallel § Latency optimized: assume work load is mostly sequential ¡ To minimize latency eXperienced by 1 thread: § lots of big on-chip caches § sophisticated control ¡ To maXimize throughput of all threads: § multithreading can hide latency … so skip the big caches § simpler control, cost amortized over ALUs via SIMD 5/54 Latency vs. Throughput Specificaons Westmere-EP Fermi (Tesla C2050) 6 cores, 2 issue, 14 SMs, 2 issue, 16 Processing Elements 4 way SIMD way SIMD @3.46 GHz @1.15 GHz 6 cores, 2 threads, 4 14 SMs, 48 SIMD Resident Strands/ way SIMD: vectors, 32 way Westmere-EP (32nm) Threads (max) SIMD: 48 strands 21504 threads SP GFLOP/s 166 1030 Memory Bandwidth 32 GB/s 144 GB/s Register File ~6 kB 1.75 MB Local Store/L1 Cache 192 kB 896 kB L2 Cache 1.5 MB 0.75 MB
    [Show full text]
  • What Is SPMD? Messages
    1 2 Outline Motivation for MPI Overview of PVM and MPI The pro cess that pro duced MPI What is di erent ab out MPI? { the \usual" send/receive Jack Dongarra { the MPI send/receive { simple collective op erations Computer Science Department New in MPI: Not in MPI UniversityofTennessee Some simple complete examples, in Fortran and C and Communication mo des, more on collective op erations Implementation status Mathematical Sciences Section Oak Ridge National Lab oratory MPICH - a free, p ortable implementation MPI resources on the Net MPI-2 http://www.netlib.org/utk/p eople/JackDongarra.html 3 4 Messages What is SPMD? 2 Messages are packets of data moving b etween sub-programs. 2 Single Program, Multiple Data 2 The message passing system has to b e told the 2 Same program runs everywhere. following information: 2 Restriction on the general message-passing mo del. { Sending pro cessor 2 Some vendors only supp ort SPMD parallel programs. { Source lo cation { Data typ e 2 General message-passing mo del can b e emulated. { Data length { Receiving pro cessors { Destination lo cation { Destination size 5 6 Access Point-to-Point Communication 2 A sub-program needs to b e connected to a message passing 2 Simplest form of message passing. system. 2 One pro cess sends a message to another 2 A message passing system is similar to: 2 Di erenttyp es of p oint-to p oint communication { Mail b ox { Phone line { fax machine { etc. 7 8 Synchronous Sends Asynchronous Sends Provide information about the completion of the Only know when the message has left.
    [Show full text]
  • Cuda C Programming Guide
    CUDA C PROGRAMMING GUIDE PG-02829-001_v10.0 | October 2018 Design Guide CHANGES FROM VERSION 9.0 ‣ Documented restriction that operator-overloads cannot be __global__ functions in Operator Function. ‣ Removed guidance to break 8-byte shuffles into two 4-byte instructions. 8-byte shuffle variants are provided since CUDA 9.0. See Warp Shuffle Functions. ‣ Passing __restrict__ references to __global__ functions is now supported. Updated comment in __global__ functions and function templates. ‣ Documented CUDA_ENABLE_CRC_CHECK in CUDA Environment Variables. ‣ Warp matrix functions now support matrix products with m=32, n=8, k=16 and m=8, n=32, k=16 in addition to m=n=k=16. www.nvidia.com CUDA C Programming Guide PG-02829-001_v10.0 | ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1. Introduction.........................................................................................1 1.1. From Graphics Processing to General Purpose Parallel Computing............................... 1 1.2. CUDA®: A General-Purpose Parallel Computing Platform and Programming Model.............3 1.3. A Scalable Programming Model.........................................................................4 1.4. Document Structure...................................................................................... 5 Chapter 2. Programming Model............................................................................... 7 2.1. Kernels......................................................................................................7 2.2. Thread Hierarchy........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Exploiting Automatic Vectorization to Employ SPMD on SIMD Registers
    Exploiting automatic vectorization to employ SPMD on SIMD registers Stefan Sprenger Steffen Zeuch Ulf Leser Department of Computer Science Intelligent Analytics for Massive Data Department of Computer Science Humboldt-Universitat¨ zu Berlin German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence Humboldt-Universitat¨ zu Berlin Berlin, Germany Berlin, Germany Berlin, Germany [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Abstract—Over the last years, vectorized instructions have multi-threading with SIMD instructions1. For these reasons, been successfully applied to accelerate database algorithms. How- vectorization is essential for the performance of database ever, these instructions are typically only available as intrinsics systems on modern CPU architectures. and specialized for a particular hardware architecture or CPU model. As a result, today’s database systems require a manual tai- Although modern compilers, like GCC [2], provide auto loring of database algorithms to the underlying CPU architecture vectorization [1], typically the generated code is not as to fully utilize all vectorization capabilities. In practice, this leads efficient as manually-written intrinsics code. Due to the strict to hard-to-maintain code, which cannot be deployed on arbitrary dependencies of SIMD instructions on the underlying hardware, hardware platforms. In this paper, we utilize ispc as a novel automatically transforming general scalar code into high- compiler that employs the Single Program Multiple Data (SPMD) execution model, which is usually found on GPUs, on the SIMD performing SIMD programs remains a (yet) unsolved challenge. lanes of modern CPUs. ispc enables database developers to exploit To this end, all techniques for auto vectorization have focused vectorization without requiring low-level details or hardware- on enhancing conventional C/C++ programs with SIMD instruc- specific knowledge.
    [Show full text]
  • ECE 590: Digital Systems Design Using Hardware Description Language (VHDL) Systolic Implementation of Faddeev's Algorithm in V
    Project Report ECE 590: Digital Systems Design using Hardware Description Language (VHDL) Systolic Implementation of Faddeev’s Algorithm in VHDL. Final Project Tejas Tapsale. PSU ID: 973524088. Project Report Introduction: = In this project we are implementing Nash’s systolic implementation and Chuang an He,s systolic implementation for Faddeev’s algorithm. These two implementations have their own advantages and drawbacks. Here in this project report we first see detail of Nash implementation and then we will go for Chaung and He’s implementation. The organization of this report is like this:- 1. First we take detail idea about what is systolic architecture and how it can be used for matrix multiplication and its advantages and disadvantages. 2. Then we discuss about Gaussian Elimination for matrix computation and its properties. 3. Then we will see Faddeev’s algorithm and how it is used. 4. Systolic arrays for MATRIX TRIANGULARIZATION 5. We will discuss Nash implementation in detail and its VHDL coding. 6. Advantages and disadvantage of Nash systolic implementation. 7. Chaung and He’s implementation in detail and its VHDL coding. 8. Difficulties chased in this project. 9. Conclusion. 10. VHDL code for Nash Implementation. 11. VHDL code for Chaung and He’s Implementation. 12. Simulation Results. 13. References. 14. PowerPoint Presentation Project Report 1: Systolic Architecture: = A systolic array is composed of matrix-like rows of data processing units called cells. Data processing units (DPU) are similar to central processing units (CPU)s, (except for the usual lack of a program counter, since operation is transport-triggered, i.e., by the arrival of a data object).
    [Show full text]