Abstracts for 2020 Symposium Sessions
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Endangered Species Bulletin, May/June 2003 - Vol
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Endangered Species Bulletins and Technical Reports (USFWS) US Fish & Wildlife Service May 2003 Endangered Species Bulletin, May/June 2003 - Vol. XXVIII No. 3 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/endangeredspeciesbull Part of the Biodiversity Commons "Endangered Species Bulletin, May/June 2003 - Vol. XXVIII No. 3" (2003). Endangered Species Bulletins and Technical Reports (USFWS). 10. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/endangeredspeciesbull/10 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the US Fish & Wildlife Service at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Endangered Species Bulletins and Technical Reports (USFWS) by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Human beings are the only living things that care about lines on a map. Wild animals and plants know no borders, and they are unaware of the social and economic forces that deter- mine their future. Because May/June 2003 Vol. XXVIII No. 3 many of these creatures are migratory or distributed across the artificial bound- aries that we humans have drawn, they cannot be con- served without the coopera- tion of government, private sector, and scientific partners in each of the affected coun- tries. Such wide-scale partici- pation is essential for apply- ing an ecosystem approach to wildlife conservation. This edition of the Bulletin features some examples of cooperative activities for the survival and recovery of rare plants and animals in Mexico and bordering areas of the United States. U.S.U.S. -
Thesis Rapid Ascent: Rocky Mountain National Park In
THESIS RAPID ASCENT: ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATIONAL PARK IN THE GREAT ACCELERATION, 1945-PRESENT Submitted by Mark Boxell Department of History In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the Degree of Master of Arts Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado Summer 2016 Master’s Committee: Advisor: Mark Fiege Ben Bobowski Adrian Howkins John Lindenbaum Jared Orsi Copyright by Mark Boxell 2016 All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT RAPID ASCENT: ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATIONAL PARK IN THE GREAT ACCELERATION, 1945-PRESENT After the Second World War’s conclusion, Rocky Mountain National Park (RMNP) experienced a massive rise in visitation. Mobilized by an affluent economy and a growing, auto- centric infrastructure, Americans rushed to RMNP in droves, setting off new concerns over the need for infrastructure improvements in the park. National parks across the country experienced similar explosions in visitation, inspiring utilities- and road-building campaigns throughout the park units administered by the National Park Service. The quasi-urbanization of parks like RMNP implicated the United States’ public lands in a process of global change, whereby wartime technologies, cheap fossil fuels, and a culture of techno-optimism—epitomized by the Mission 66 development program—helped foster a “Great Acceleration” of human alterations of Earth’s natural systems. This transformation culminated in worldwide turns toward mass-urbanization, industrial agriculture, and globalized markets. The Great Acceleration, part of the Anthropocene— a new geologic epoch we have likely entered, which proposes that humans have become a force of geologic change—is used as a conceptual tool for understanding the connections between local and global changes which shaped the park after World War II. -
Name Elevator No CO Conveyance ID 100 EAST MAIN 18592L CP16-000072 106 N FRENCH 407503 CP09-001296 1560 PINE GROVE RD BV590464 C
Name Elevator No CO Conveyance ID 100 EAST MAIN 18592L CP16-000072 106 N FRENCH 407503 CP09-001296 1560 PINE GROVE RD BV590464 CP13-000710 1600 PINE GROVE EJ5851 CP08-001973 1874 GEORGETOWN SCHOOL 14270-L CP12-000696 204 S GALENA ST HANDICAP LIFT 630130 CP14-000240 225 MAIN ST ER6938 CP09-003119 2551 DOLORES LLC EP1461 NOT REGISTERED WITH STATE 300 S SPRING ST COA 611067 CP12-000239 308 E HOPKINS CONDO ASSOC EAC805 CP09-005503 308 E HOPKINS CONDO ASSOC EAC806 CP09-005504 311 MAIN ST 117999 CP12-000216 320 MAIN ST CONDO ASSN 009379 CP11-000374 320 SOUTH MAIN 66083 CP15-000664 327 MAIN ST CBJ531 CP13-000031 4 POINTS LODGE EBT951 CP13-000390 415 EAST HYMAN AVE LLC 51868-FL-B CP11-002146 514 AH LLC 5021458 CP14-000647 514 AH LLC 62866 CP14-000648 625 MAIN CONDO ASSOC EBB305 CP12-000846 625 MAIN CONDO ASSOC EBB306 CP12-000847 625 MAIN CONDO ASSOC EBB304 CP12-000845 701 GRAND AVE. IE08-83307 CP09-002123 8TH ST PROF BLDG C570596038 CP12-000295 AAA STORAGE 472555 CP09-001249 ADDISON CENTER CONDO ASSOC INC 238917 CP09-002635 ADVOCATES OF LAKE COUNTY 614602 CP13-000117 AGAVE RESTAURANT 11-2198 CP09-001683 AIRPORT OPERATION CENTER BC601584 CP09-001684 AJAX MOUNTAIN BUILDING 215334 CP15-000030 ALANTE VISTA/ARROWHEAD 200907 CP09-000859 ALANTE VISTA/EAGLE RIDGE ON SUMMIT WINTERSET 2P0702 CP11-001221 1 ALLIES CABIN 455412 CP09-001451 ALLIES CABIN 37118 CP09-001450 ALLINGTON INN & SUITES EY7423 CP12-000343 ALPENGLOW HGD2621 CP08-005142 ALPINE BANK - AVON 472419 CP09-001228 ALPINE BANK - BRECK EP7197 CP09-001685 ALPINE BANK - GS F34573 CP11-000163 ALPINE -
On the Pima County Multi-Species Conservation Plan, Arizona
United States Department of the Interior Fish and ,Vildlife Service Arizona Ecological Services Office 2321 West Royal Palm Road, Suite 103 Phoenix, Arizona 85021-4951 Telephone: (602) 242-0210 Fax: (602) 242-2513 In reply refer to: AESO/SE 22410-2006-F-0459 April 13, 2016 Memorandum To: Regional Director, Fish and Wildlife Service, Albuquerque, New Mexico (ARD-ES) (Attn: Michelle Shaughnessy) Chief, Arizona Branch, Re.. gul 7/to . D'vision, Army Corps of Engineers, Phoenix, Arizona From: Acting Field Supervisor~ Subject: Biological and Conference Opinion on the Pima County Multi-Species Conservation Plan, Arizona This biological and conference opinion (BCO) responds to the Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) requirement for intra-Service consultation on the proposed issuance of a section lO(a)(l)(B) incidental take permit (TE-84356A-O) to Pima County and Pima County Regional Flood Control District (both herein referenced as Pima County), pursuant to section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (U.S.C. 1531-1544), as amended (ESA), authorizing the incidental take of 44 species (4 plants, 7 mammals, 8 birds, 5 fishes, 2 amphibians, 6 reptiles, and 12 invertebrates). Along with the permit application, Pima County submitted a draft Pima County Multi-Species Conservation Plan (MSCP). On June 10, 2015, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) requested programmatic section 7 consultation for actions under section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CW A), including two Regional General Permits and 16 Nationwide Permits, that are also covered activities in the MSCP. This is an action under section 7 of the ESA that is separate from the section 10 permit issuance to Pima Couny. -
Private Luxury Camp Experiences
PRIVATE LUXURY CAMP EXPERIENCES SUMMER, 2020 A private destination summer camp experience for the whole family. NO CAMP? NO PROBLEM! With most camps forced to close this summer, how can concerned parents keep their children stimulated and safe in the age of post-lockdown social distancing? This exclusive opportunity has been designed to offer comfortable settings allowing for social distancing, through private accommodations, private meals, private activities and a dedicated private counselor. Kids will be entertained with full days of play with their personal counselor, while parents can relax with peace of mind or work remotely if necessary. Whether you are looking to travel alone or with one or two close friends or family, our team will tailor a customized program for every age group around everyone's interests. PRIVATE ACCOMMODATIONS We have curated a host of private and semi-private destinations to choose from around the USA, Caribbean and Mexico, including ranches, private lodges, mountain escapes and beach getaways. Working Remotely? Upgrade Your View! For mom and dad we recognize it may not be all fun and games – we’ll have a remote office set up for your convenience as well as make sure you get the time you need to unwind! Our highly trained private counselors will provide you the time to get dressed up for that date night and dressed down to participate in personally designed family activities, meant to create lasting life-enriching memories for years to come. YOUR PRIVATE CAMP DIRECTOR Meet Lynda Levy, she brings the FUN! Our camp director Lynda Levy, is not only one of the most fun and most creative people you will meet, but she comes with over 10 years of experience in camp programming and multi-generational entertainment planning. -
Tumamoc Hill 2
NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK, Theme XX: Arts and Science, Science and Invention NPS Form 10-900 (3-82) 0MB No. 1024-0018 Expires 10-31-87 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service For NPS use only National Register of Historic Places received Inventory—Nomination Form date entered See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type ali entries—complete applicable sections_______________ 1. Name historic Desert Laboratory of the Carnegie Institution and or common Tumamoc Hill 2. Location street & number Intersection of W. Anklam Road and W. St. Mary's Road not for publication city, town Tucson vicinity of state Arizona code 04 county code 019 3. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use district xx public xx occupied agriculture museum yx building(s) private unoccupied commercial park structure both work in progress xx educational private residence site Public Acquisition Accessible entertainment religious Object in process xx yes: restricted government xx scientific being considered _ yes: unrestricted industrial transportation no military __ other: 4. Owner of Property name University of Arizona and Arizona State Lands Department (owns 340 acres) (owns 520 acres, leased to Univ. of AZ) street & number 1624 West Adams city, town Tucson, AZ 85721 vicinity of Phoenix state AZ 85007 5. Location of Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. Pima County Courthouse street & number city, town Tucson state Arizona 6. Representation in Existing Surveys title Historic American Buildings Surve^as tnis property been determined eligible? ——yes no date 1981 __ __________________—X- federal __ state __ county _ local depository for survey records Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. -
United States Department of the Interior U.S. Fish and Wildlife
United States Department of the Interior U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2321 West Royal Palm Road, Suite 103 Phoenix, Arizona 85021 Telephone: (602) 242-0210 FAX: (602) 242-2513 AESO/SE 2-21-94-F-192R2 September 30, 2002 Memorandum To: Field Manager, Phoenix Field Office, Bureau of Land Management From: Acting Field Supervisor Subject: Biological Opinion for Five Livestock Grazing Allotments in the Vicinity of Ajo, Arizona This biological opinion responds to your request for consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) pursuant to section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531- 1544), as amended (Act). Your request for formal consultation was dated April 19, 2002, and received by us on April 23, 2002. At issue are impacts that may result from the proposed reauthorization of livestock grazing on the Sentinel, Cameron, Childs, Coyote Flat, and Why allotments located in Maricopa and Pima counties, Arizona. The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has determined that the proposed action for the five allotments may adversely affect the endangered Sonoran pronghorn (Antilocapra americana sonoriensis), and the proposed action for the Cameron and Childs allotments may adversely affect the endangered cactus ferruginous pygmy-owl (Glaucidium brasilianum cactorum). In your letter, you also requested our concurrence that the proposed action on the Cameron, Childs, Coyote Flat, and Why allotments may affect, but will not likely adversely affect, the endangered lesser long-nosed bat (Leptonycteris curasoae yerbabuena). We concur with that determination, which is based on sound analysis and guidance criteria for the species mutually agreed upon by our agencies. -
History of the Quitobaquito Resource Management Area, Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument, Arizona
Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2012 with funding from LYRASIS Members and Sloan Foundation http://archive.org/details/historyofquitobaOOnati ; 2 ? . 2 H $z X Cooperative National Park Resources Studies Unit ARIZONA TECHNICAL REPORT NO. 2 6 A History of the Quitobaquito Resource Management Area, Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument, Arizona by Peter S. Bennett and Michael R. Kunzmann University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona 85721 Western Region National Park Service Department of the Interior San Francisco, Ca. 94102 COOPERATIVE NATIONAL PARK RESOURCES STUDIES UNIT University of Arizona/Tucson - National Park Service The Cooperative National Park Resources Studies Unit/University of Arizona (CPSU/UA) was established August 16, 1973. The unit is funded by the National Park Service and reports to the Western Regional Office, San Francisco; it is located on the campus of the University of Arizona and reports also to the Office of the Vice-President for Research. Administrative assistance is provided by the Western Arche- ological and Conservation Center, the School of Renewable Natural Resources, and the Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. The unit's professional personnel hold adjunct faculty and/or research associate appointments with the University. The Materials and Ecological Testing Laboratory is maintained at the Western Archeological and Conservation Center, 1415 N. 6th Ave., Tucson, Arizona 85705. The CPSU/UA provides a multidisciplinary approach to studies in the natural and cultural sciences. Funded projects identified by park management are investigated by National Park Service and university researchers under the coordination of the Unit Leader. Unit members also cooperate with researchers involved in projects funded by non-National Park Service sources in order to obtain scientific information on Park Service lands. -
What Does It Mean to Visit a Place Like Rocky Mountain National Park? Visitors Tell Their Stories in Colorado
WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO VISIT A PLACE LIKE ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATIONAL PARK? VISITORS TELL THEIR STORIES IN COLORADO Jeffrey J. Brooks John P. Titre George N. Wallace Colorado State University College of Natural Resources Department of Natural Resource Recreation & Tourism “It has become evident to me from my own and others’ experiences in a variety of studies, that stories are a recurrent and prominent feature of respondents’ accounts in all types of interviews.” Elliot G. Mishler, 1986a, p. 235 ABSTRACT Human experience can be rich and filled with meaning in special places that are protected for natural resource and outdoor recreation value. Within a hermeneutic and meaning-based framework, we interviewed both day and overnight visitors in both developed and backcountry settings at Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado, United States. The objective was to describe and interpret the relationship between park visitors and the resource setting. Interviews were in depth, semi-structured, and audio recorded to capture subjective meanings of the experience. Questions and probes regarding important characteristics of the setting, special places, feelings and emotions, and pros and cons of protecting wilderness guided informants’ responses. Interview transcripts for two sample individuals were interpreted as personal narratives about the experience of the setting. These idiographic (i.e., within individual) analyses were organized around two broad themes: (1) claimed identity expressed through the interview and (2) current personal project(s) in which the individual was engaged. Recurrent sub themes and dimensions of identity and current project for each individual are explored (e.g., object- centered and subject-centered experience and spirituality). -
Coronado National Forest
CORONADO NATIONAL FOREST FIRE MANAGEMENT PLAN Reviewed and Updated by _/s/ Chris Stetson ___________ Date __5/18/10 __________ Coronado Fire Management Plan Interagency Federal fire policy requires that every area with burnable vegetation must have a Fire Management Plan (FMP). This FMP provides information concerning the fire process for the Coronado National Forest and compiles guidance from existing sources such as but not limited to, the Coronado National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan (LRMP), national policy, and national and regional directives. The potential consequences to firefighter and public safety and welfare, natural and cultural resources, and values to be protected help determine the management response to wildfire. Firefighter and public safety are the first consideration and are always the priority during every response to wildfire. The following chapters discuss broad forest and specific Fire Management Unit (FMU) characteristics and guidance. Chapter 1 introduces the area covered by the FMP, includes a map of the Coronado National Forest, addresses the agencies involved, and states why the forest is developing the FMP. Chapter 2 establishes the link between higher-level planning documents, legislation, and policies and the actions described in FMP. Chapter 3 articulates specific goals, objectives, standards, guidelines, and/or desired future condition(s), as established in the forest’s LRMP, which apply to all the forest’s FMUs and those that are unique to the forest’s individual FMUs. Page 1 of 30 Coronado Fire Management Plan Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION The Coronado National Forest developed this FMP as a decision support tool to help fire personnel and decision makers determine the response to an unplanned ignition. -
THE ARCHAIC OCCUPATION of the ROSEMONT AREA, NORTHERN SANTA RITA MOUNTAINS, SOUTHEASTERN ARIZONA by Bruce B. Huckell K with Cont
THE ARCHAIC OCCUPATION OF THE ROSEMONT AREA, NORTHERN SANTA RITA MOUNTAINS, SOUTHEASTERN ARIZONA by Bruce B. Huckell K with contributions by Lisa W. Huckell Robert S. Thompson Cultural Resource Management Division Arizona State Museum University of Arizona Archaeological Series No. 147, Vol. I THE ARCHAIC OCCUPATION OF THE ROSEMONT AREA, NORTHERN SANTA RITA MOUNTAINS, SOUTHEASTERN ARIZONA by Bruce B. Huckell Contributions by Lisa W. Huckell Robert S. Thompson Submitted by Cultural Resource Management Division Arizona State Museum University of Arizona Prepared for ANAMAX Mining Company 1984 Archaeological Series No. 147, Vol. I CONTENTS FIGURES vii TABLES PREFACE xiii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS xvi ABSTRACT xviii Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION 1 The Archaic Period 2 Previous Research 5 2. THE ENVIRONMENT OF THE ROSEMONT AREA AND SURROUNDING REGIONS 11 General Geography 11 Geology 13 Climate 17 Vegetation 19 Fauna 28 The Paleoenvironment 29 Recent Changes in the Local Biotic Communities 30 Long-Term Changes in the Environment 32 3. A FRAMEWORK FOR RESEARCH AT THE ROSEMONT ARCHAIC SITES 35 Hunter-Gatherer Organization 35 Research Domains 38 Problem Domain I: Subsistence-Settlement Systems 38 Problem Domain II: Cultural and Temporal Affinities 40 Site Selection 41 4. INVESTIGATIONS AT AND DESCRIPTIONS OF THE SITES 43 Field Methods 43 Results of Excavations: Site Descriptions 46 AZ EE:2:62--The Wasp Canyon Site 48 Investigation 50 Features 52 Structures 52 Rock Clusters 56 Artifacts 58 iii iv Contents AZ EE:2:65 59 Investigation 59 -
Crowning the Queen of the Sonoran Desert: Tucson and Saguaro National Park
Crowning the Queen of the Sonoran Desert: Tucson and Saguaro National Park An Administrative History Marcus Burtner University of Arizona 2011 Figure 1. Copper Pamphlet produced by Tucson Chamber of Commerce, SAGU257, Box 1, Folder 11, WACC. “In a canon near the deserted mission of Cocospera, Cereus giganteus was first met with. The first specimen brought the whole party to a halt. Standing alone upon a rocky projection, it rose in a single unbranched column to the height of some thirty feet, and formed a sight which seemed almost worth the journey to behold. Advancing into the canon, specimens became more numerous, until at length the whole vegetation was, in places, made up of this and other Cacaceae. Description can convey no adequate idea of this singular vegetation, at once so grand and dreary. The Opuntia arborescens and Cereus Thurberi, which had before been regarded with wonder, now seemed insignificant in comparison with the giant Cactus which towered far above.” George Thurber, 1855, Boundary Commission Report.1 Table of Contents 1 Asa Gray, ―Plantae Novae Thurberianae: The Characters of Some New Genera and Species of Plants in a Collection Made by George Thurber, Esq., of the Late Mexican Boundary ii List of Illustrations v List of Maps ix Introduction Crowning the Queen of the Desert 1 The Question of Social Value and Intrinsically Valuable Landscapes Two Districts with a Shared History Chapter 1 Uncertain Pathways to a Saguaro National Monument, 1912-1933 9 Saguaros and the Sonoran Desert A Forest of Saguaros Discovering