DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix 6 – Neighbour Consultation Responses

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Appendix 6 – Neighbour Consultation Responses COMMENTOR COMMENT 1 Katherine Smith 1. The number of units is an increase from the initial proposed 114 to 144 units; approximately 25% 1 bed, 23 Primezone 60% 2 bed, 15% 3 bed. Mews 2. The resulting number of people potentially in this small space could be around Crouch End 650 made up of: London N8 9JP a. Number of people occupying the units could be in excess of 500 b. 67 hotel rooms - when fully occupied with 2 people = 134 people Objection to proposal Questions: What provisions in terms of budgets, amenities and services are in place to cater for this potential excessive rise in population density in this small space? Where can I access impact assessment documents? I‟d like to understand how the council has researched and assessed how this increase will affect: Doctors surgeries Schools Transport (in particular the already overcrowded W7 bus route) Parking spaces (see below) Pollution from more traffic Litter and refuse collection Noise pollution The drainage system Crime rates and policing 3. Height of Block A - up to 7-storey. I don‟t believe we were given an accurate photographic representation of how this would look. We were shown “impact” photos (i.e. made-up pictures but supposedly accurate from the Architect), which were all taken with trees totally obscuring the potential view of the building. Buildings in this area are maximum 4-storey (5 if you consider roof rooms). In order for people to have an accurate and informed view of the development, we should have access to a 360-degree view of the area, and not highly selected angle shots chosen by the developer. Appendix 6 – Neighbour Consultation Responses There are no images from Primezone Mews. A 7-storey building will this dominate the skyline, impacting light, noise and privacy. There were no photos from this angle. 4. Nearness of building to current boundaries: According to plan / image: www.planningservices.haringey.gov.uk/portal/servlets/AttachmentShowServlet?ImageName=975076 the underground car park is right up against the boundary wall for Primezone Mews - my flat is a mere 1.5m away from it. I don‟t feel the diagrams we were shown were accurate. I was told Block A was 10m away from the boundary wall, and yet there is nothing to demonstrate this in any diagrams we saw or the plan online. I would like to see accurate to-scale drawings. Questions: What are the effects on the foundations, digging up trees, risk of subsidence etc. when building up against a boundary wall? I'd like to see documents showing there is NO RISK from digging an underground car park, and the FULL distance between the boundary wall and the proposed 7-storey Block A. To date, there has been no Party Wall Agreement or survey to assess this risk, so how can this proposed diagram be considered to be accurate? Where can I access impact assessment documents to understand how the council has researched and assessed how this building will affect Primezone Mews flats, in particular: Light Privacy Noise 5. Parking / traffic. There will be 40 spaces for 144 units, which could potentially have 300 or more cars. Plus there will be traffic from visitors to the 67 hotel rooms. There will also be 25 car park spaces lost from the removal of the spaces in Haringey Library. The council apparently will not grant parking permits to residents. Haringey Park Appendix 6 – Neighbour Consultation Responses and Weston Park are already oversubscribed in terms of permits/spaces available. There is little doubt people will park in HP and WP and move their cars at the non-permitted times. Questions: Where can we see this guarantee (not to grant parking permits) in writing? Where is the traffic assessment work carried out by the council? 6. Lack of affordable and social housing This is a luxury housing development ¿ this is NOT affordable housing and out of the 144 units, only 4 are designated social housing. This could be seen as an attempt at social cleansing, which in a Labour area, with a Labour council and Labour MP is diabolical. Typically investment developments such as this only serve one purpose to line the pockets of the rich investors abroad, and not the people who will come and live in the local community. Question: We weren‟t told the proportion of buy-to-let vs. properties for sale, so how can we have access to this information? 7. Loss of designated conservation areas: trees, animals, wild plants etc. will disappear. The development will retain 31 trees, but there will be a loss of the conservation area, which will be replaced by the underground car park. Crouch End is a designated conservation area; http://www.haringey.gov.uk/sites/haringeygovuk/files/haringey_conservation_areas_map-2.pdf. From the Haringey website: In a conservation area, local authorities must take into account the need to preserve or enhance the area‟s special character when deciding whether to grant planning permission. his build of a 7-storey tower block plus other units to make 144 flats, with approximately 500 people surely totally contravenes the preservation or enhancement of the character of the area. Appendix 6 – Neighbour Consultation Responses 8. Finally, the presentation of materials and documentation. These were not accurate and therefore it is not possible to make a fully informed appraisal of the development. The information is piecemeal. As stated, the photos were from selectively chosen angles, there were trees obscuring views There are no accurate to-scale architectural diagrams showing how far the buildings are from boundary walls. The presentation delivered by the architect was different to the designs on the printouts. The diagrams presented also differ to the ones online. There is no diagram showing the traffic entrance to the development. All of this makes me feel there is an element of non-discloser / omission of facts designed to confuse the public and misinform them. 2 Steve Crowley Comments: We object to the planning application, most specifically to the construction of a seven storey and Caroline residential building in the car park area to the rear, on several grounds. McGraw 18 Primezone Firstly, a building if this size is out of keeping with the area. There are few, if any, seven storey buildings in Mews Crouch End so it would be inappropriate on these grounds alone and would set an unfortunate precedent N8 9JP for further planned high rise developments. Objection to Secondly, the development would have an impact on numbers in local schools which are already popular. proposal These schools cannot continue to grow: are there plans to deal with the impact of so many new families on education services. Thirdly, the development will increase pressure on parking on Haringey Park which is already full in the evenings. I am aware that there are plans to provide parking facilities in the basement: will this be sufficient to cater for so many flats (professional families often have two cars) and any visitors they might have? Finally, the impact on Primezone Mews will be considerable. The flats numbered 23-28 will be deprived of sunlight every day from around 4:00pm until sunset if a development this size goes ahead. Additionally, these flats have rear gardens which would be overlooked and lose all sense of privacy in consequence. The rest of the development will suffer to a similar if lesser extent. Appendix 6 – Neighbour Consultation Responses 3 Farinaz Fazli I am raising very strong objections to the proposed plans to build a seven story property at the immediate Ground Floor back of my home which are totally unreasonable and I know ALL THE Flat. 25 Weston RESIDENTS along Weston Park feel the same. Park. N8 9SY I live at 25 Weston park and own the ground floor flat. I am horrified to see they are proposing a 7storey building metres behind my property and are also putting in windows on that side of the building which Objection to overlooks my garden and into my home. The 7 storey building is far too high and an eye sore even from the proposal photographs and it's higher than any of the trees and is higher than any other buildings around here. The view from the back of my house will look like a concrete jungle and very unsightly and not in line with the rest of the area. All the houses along my stretch are Victorian buildings and have double French doors into the garden from the living room. We will be living in fish bowls. This is going to be between 2 to 5 m away from the bottom my very small garden. The proximity is unacceptable! The grounds for my objection are but not limited to the following: 1-The significant loss of light despite their inaccurate and misleading claims and photos. 2-Creating a inescapable eye sore-tallest and ugliest building which is not in line with anything already there. In fact only the tower itself will be a bit taller. This will create an ugly concrete jungle. Trees will not have leaves for more than few months a year so their photos are misleading 3-huge , unreasonable and significant loss of privacy - all of our homes on this stretch are Victorian houses which have French windows accessing into the garden which means we are effectively going to be living in fishbowls as the 7 storey will have windows on this side too. The windows from the seven stories will be looking into our gardens and also to our homes . 4- huge and significant noise pollution from people and vehicles using and accesssing the flats.
Recommended publications
  • ISDS Vol 2 Descriptive Document

    ISDS Vol 2 Descriptive Document

    Hornsey Town Hall ISDS Volume 2 Descriptive Document November 2015 │ Hornsey Town Hall | ISDS Vol 2 Descriptive Document Contents Foreword _________________________________________________________ 04 Introduction ______________________________________________________ 06 Context __________________________________________________________ 08 Background ______________________________________________________ 09 The site ___________________________________________________________ 10 The development context _________________________________________ 12 The opportunity ___________________________________________________ 14 The proposed delivery structure ____________________________________ 15 Key development deliverables ____________________________________ 16 Timetable and process ____________________________________________ 18 Appendices Red line plan _______________________________________________________ I Schedule of community groups _____________________________________ II 3 Foreword Hornsey Town Hall is one of north London’s most iconic landmarks. Sitting in the heart of Haringey’s vibrant Crouch End, the fabulous art deco building is steeped in local history – having served as the civic heart of the former borough of Hornsey and played a leading role as a much-loved arts and culture hub. Opened in 1935 and built to designs by renowned architect RH Uren, Hornsey Town Hall was given its much-deserved Grade II* listed status in 1981. This is a building rich in architectural heritage, boasting a wealth of intricate period features. It is
  • Baxters Conservation Plan 2004

    Baxters Conservation Plan 2004

    HORNSEY TOWN HALL CONSERVATION PLAN Prepared for LONDON BOROUGH OF HARINGEY ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCIATES JANUARY 2004 CONTENTS CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction and Summary Findings ................................................... 2 2.0 Heritage Designations ........................................................................ 7 3.0 Understanding ................................................................................. 11 4.0 The Cultural Significance of the Town Hall and Associated Buildings .................................................................. 45 5.0 Issues and Opportunities .................................................................. 50 6.0 Policies and Guiding Principles for the Reuse of the Town Hall ........ 55 7.0 Sources ............................................................................................ 61 Appendices Appendix 1: Listed Building Descriptions .............................................. 62 Appendix 2: Crouch End and Hornsey Conservation Area Policy Document .................................. 64 Appendix 3: Extracts from Urban Design Study (2003) by Jon Rowland Urban Design ............................................... 67 Prepared by: Chris Miele, Catharine Kidd & Zoë Aspinall Reviewed by: Alan Baxter and William Filmer-Sankey First Draft issued: 18 November 2003 Consultation Draft issued: 24 November 2003 Second Draft issued: 10 December 2003 Conservation Plan issued: 28 January 2004 This report is the copyright of Alan Baxter & Associates and is for the sole use of the person/organisation
  • Appendix 4 – Internal Consultees

    Appendix 4 – Internal Consultees

    APPENDIX 4 – INTERNAL CONSULTEES INTERNAL COMMENT OFFICER CONSULTEE RESPONSE LBH Waste Further to your request concerning the above planning application I have the following comments to make: Comments Management Noted. Waste - Wheelie bins or bulk waste containers must be provided for household issues are collections. addressed in - Bulk waste containers must be located no further than 10 metres from the point of collection. Section 6 of - Route from waste storage points to collection point must be as straight as possible with no kerbs or the report. steps. Gradients should be no greater than 1:20 and surfaces should be smooth and sound, concrete rather than flexible. Dropped kerbs should be installed as necessary. - If waste containers are housed, housings must be big enough to fit as many containers as are necessary to facilitate once per week collection and be high enough for lids to be open and closed where lidded containers are installed. Internal housing layouts must allow all containers to be accessed by users. Applicants can seek further advice about housings from Waste Management if required. - Waste container housings may need to be lit so as to be safe for residents and collectors to use and service during darkness hours. - All doors and pathways need to be 200mm wider than any bins that are required to pass through or over them. - If access through security gates/doors is required for household waste collection, codes, keys, transponders or any other type of access equipment must be provided to the council. No charges will be accepted by the council for equipment required to gain access.
  • 16 Japan Crescent, London N4 4BB

    16 Japan Crescent, London N4 4BB

    16 Japan Crescent, London N4 4BB Design and Access Statement Prepared by d4p-uk limited for Mark Armstrong Document Reference: 01L004-DR001 - DAS_rev A d4p-uk | june 2014 2 Design & Access Statement: 16 Japan Crescent, London, N4 4BB Contents 1. Introduction..........................................................5 2. The Context..........................................................6 3. The Site...............................................................8 4. The Proposal......................................................10 5. Conclusions........................................................18 6. Appendices........................................................19 6.1 Appendix A - Sun Shade Analysis...................................20 6.2 Appendix B - Planning Application Drawings...................30 6.3 Appendix C - PTAL Assessment......................................47 6.4 Appendix D - Flood Risk Map.........................................51 d4p-uk | june 2014 3 Design & Access Statement: 16 Japan Crescent, London, N4 4BB d4p-uk | june 2014 4 Design & Access Statement: 16 Japan Crescent, London, N4 4BB 1. Introduction Introduction: This design and access statement has been prepared in support of the 17 23 application for full planning permission within the London Borough of Islington for the redevelopment of the site at 16 Japan Crescent, London N4 4BB. The format 15 12 of the statement follows the general headings prescibed in the Commission for JAPAN CRESCENT Architecture and the Built Environment (CABE) document ‘Design
  • This Thesis Has Been Submitted in Fulfilment of the Requirements for a Postgraduate Degree (E.G

    This Thesis Has Been Submitted in Fulfilment of the Requirements for a Postgraduate Degree (E.G

    This thesis has been submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for a postgraduate degree (e.g. PhD, MPhil, DClinPsychol) at the University of Edinburgh. Please note the following terms and conditions of use: • This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, which are retained by the thesis author, unless otherwise stated. • A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. • This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author. • The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. • When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. Systems in the Post-War Art School: Basic Design, Groundcourse and Hornsey Catherine Sloan VOLUME I PhD The University of Edinburgh 2013 1 THE UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH ABSTRACT OF THESIS Regulation 3.1.14 of the Postgraduate Assessment Regulations for Research Degrees refers These regulations are available via: http://www.ed.ac.uk/schools-departments/academic- services/policies-regulations/regulations/assessment Name of Candidate: Catherine Sloan Address : 10/2 Dalmeny Street, Edinburgh Postal Code: EH6 8RA Degree: Doctor of Philosophy Title of Thesis: Systems in the Post-War Art School: Basic Design, Groundcourse and Hornsey No. of words in the main text of Thesis: 85,000 This thesis makes the first sustained attempt to locate post-war British art school pedagogy in relation to systems-inspired cultural practice after World War II.
  • THE LONDON GAZETTE, 13Ra FEBRUARY 1959 1081

    THE LONDON GAZETTE, 13Ra FEBRUARY 1959 1081

    THE LONDON GAZETTE, 13ra FEBRUARY 1959 1081 Government, Whitehall, London S.W.I, object to the thence northwards and northwestwards along .the confirmation of the Order. centre of North Road, North Hill and Great North Road to the borough boundary. SCHEDULE (NOTE. The area includes all properties: That part of the Metropolitan Borough of Hammer- (a) In Bishopswood Road, Broadlands Road smith comprising Angel Walk, Aspen Gardens, Blacks Compton Avenue, Courtenay Avenue, Denewood Road, Bridge Avenue (including Bridge Avenue Road, Gaskell Road, Grange Road, Kenwood Road, Mansions), Bridge View, Butterwick, Butterswick North Grove, Sheldon Avenue, Storey Road, Cottages, Colet Gardens, Chancellors Road (even Stormont Road, View Road and Yeatman Road; numbers), Chancellors Street, Crisp Road, Down (b) In those parts of Aylmer Road, Bancroft Place, Edith Road (Nos. 2 to 20 even), Elric Street, Avenue, Hampstead Lane and The Grove, and of Foreman Court, Fulham Palace Road (Nos. 1 to 89 the south-west side of Great North Road which odd—"Nos 14 to 66 even) (including Guinness Build- are within the Borough of Hornsey ; and ings and Peabody Estate), Great West Road (from (c) On the west side of North Road and the Eastern Borough Boundary to Nigel Playfair Avenue), south-west side of North Hill.) Hammersmith Bridge Road (including Digby Man- sions), Hammersmith Broadway (Nos. 1 to 30 odd), Dated this 13th day of February 1959. Hammersmith Road (Nos. 157 to 267 odd), Holcombe H. Bedale, Town Clerk. Street, King Street (Nos. 1 to 191 odd), 'Lower Mall, Town Hall, Lurgan Street, Macbeth Street, Mall Road, Mall Crouch End, London N.8.
  • Highgate to Stoke Newington

    Highgate to Stoke Newington

    Capital Ring section 12 page 1 CAPITAL RING Section 12 of 15 Highgate to Stoke Newington Section start: Priory Gardens, Highgate Nearest station to start: Highgate (Northern line) Section finish: Stoke Newington Nearest station to finish: Stoke Newington (Rail) Section distance 5.4 miles plus 0.2 miles of station links Total = 5.6 miles (9.0 km) Introduction This section starts at Priory Gardens, near Highgate station. Although this is a densely populated area, surprisingly this walk is one of the greenest parts of the Capital Ring. This is largely achieved by following most of the Parkland Walk (London's longest nature reserve) along a former railway line. It is easy walking on firm paths and pavements, with a steep climb including some steps at the start; this can be avoided on an alternative route. After the Parkland Walk, the route passes through the beautiful Finsbury Park, along by the New River - created as a canal four hundred years ago - past Stoke Newington Reservoirs, into the attractive Clissold Park and finishes at the fascinating Abney Park Cemetery. There are pubs or cafés at Highgate, Crouch End Hill, Finsbury Park, Manor House, Woodberry Down, Clissold Park and Stoke Newington. There is a small outdoor café at the Priory Road exit from Highgate Tube Station. Public toilets are at Finsbury Park and Clissold Park. There are links with Crouch Hill, Finsbury Park and Manor House stations. Updated by members of the Ramblers for Transport for London In this format: text © Ramblers 2020, maps © OpenStreetMap Downloaded from: http://innerlondonramblers.org.uk/capital-ring Capital Ring section 12 page 2 Walking directions From Highgate station ticket office, take the Priory Gardens exit where the is a Capital Ring link sign.
  • Crouch End Conservation Area Character Appraisal

    Crouch End Conservation Area Character Appraisal

    London Borough of Haringey Conservation Area No. 5 Crouch End Conservation Area Character Appraisal Cabinet draft: 14th September 2010 (Appendix 1) CONSERVATION AREA CHARACTER APPRAISAL CROUCH END CONSERVATION AREA (No. 5) CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 5 Background to the Study 5 Heritage Assets 6 General Identity and Character of the Conservation Area 8 Designation and Extensions 9 Context of the Conservation Area within the Wider Settlement 9 Topography 9 Key Views 10 2. DEFINITION OF SPECIAL INTEREST 11 Sub Areas 12 3. ASSESSING SPECIAL INTEREST 13 Historic Development 13 Archaeology 13 Before 1815 13 1815 – 1870 15 1870 – 1935 16 1935 – Present Day 17 4. SPATIAL AND CHARACTER ANALYSIS Sub Area 1. The Core Area: Crouch End Town Centre 19 Overall character and appearance 19 The Broadway 20 Haringey Park (north side) 31 Tottenham Lane 32 Middle Lane (east side) 36 Park Road 37 Coleridge Road 42 Crouch End Hill 43 Crouch Hill 46 5. SPATIAL AND CHARACTER ANALYSIS Sub Area 2. New Road/Elder Avenue 49 Overall character and appearance 49 Lynton Road 49 New Road 51 Back Lane 52 Middle Lane 53 Elder Avenue 54 1 6. SPATIAL AND CHARACTER ANALYSIS Sub Area 3. Haringey Park 57 Overall character and appearance 57 Hatherley Gardens 57 Haringey Park (north side) 58 Ravensdale Mansions 59 Sandringham Gardens 59 Haringey Park (south side) 60 Ivy Gardens 61 7. SPATIAL AND CHARACTER ANALYSIS Sub Area 4. Weston Park to Cecile Park 63 Overall character and appearance 63 Weston Park 63 Felix Avenue 65 Elder Avenue 66 Fairfield Road 67 Aubrey Road 68 Drylands Road 69 Bourne Road 70 Landrock Road 71 Gladwell Road 71 Cecile Park 72 8.
  • 71 Crouch End Hill Hornsey

    71 Crouch End Hill Hornsey

    Finsbury Park Lettings, 8 Blackstock Road, London N4 2DL T 020 7704 5777 E [email protected] W www.ludlowthompson.com 71 CROUCH END HILL HORNSEY LET REF: 2148345 2 Bed, Complex Apartment, Communal Garden, 1 Allocated Parking Space Two Bedroom Apartment - Secure Allocated Parking - High Standard Throughout - VIDEO VIEWING AVAILABLE - Gated Development - Landscaped Communal Gardens VIDEO VIEWING AVAILABLE. Stunning two bedroom contemporary apartment situated within a former telephone exchange building. Comprising of a bright and spacious reception room with modern open plan fitted kitchen, two bedrooms, the master offering built in wardrobes, four piece luxury bathroom, Juliette balcony, landscaped communal gardens and a underground allocated parking space. Benefiting from wood flooring, floor to ceiling windows, intercom entry system and plenty of storage. Located moment... continued below Train/Tube - Hornsey, Harringay, Archway, Crouch Hill Finsbury Park Lettings, 8 Blackstock Road, London N4 2DL T 020 7704 5777 E [email protected] W www.ludlowthompson.com 71 CROUCH END HILL HORNSEY Living Room Living Room alt Bedroom 1 Bedroom 1 alt Bedroom 2 Bedroom 2 alt Finsbury Park Lettings, 8 Blackstock Road, London N4 2DL T 020 7704 5777 E [email protected] W www.ludlowthompson.com 71 CROUCH END HILL HORNSEY Bathroom Communal Gardens Exterior Finsbury Park Lettings, 8 Blackstock Road, London N4 2DL T 020 7704 5777 E [email protected] W www.ludlowthompson.com 71 CROUCH END HILL HORNSEY Please note that this floor plan is produced for illustration and identification purposes only. It is NOT drawn to a scale. Measurements are taken in accordance with the R.I.C.S.
  • Property for Sale Crouch End

    Property for Sale Crouch End

    Property For Sale Crouch End Sometimes Micronesian Tad embrute her catalogers indeterminately, but uncoiled Tanny freeze loose or rake-offs florally. Proletarian and subglacial Cain often doctors some snivels remissly or unlearns imperialistically. Fulvous Connolly usually leaned some turnspit or cauterises ought. In the hornsey town hall, fridge freezer and is being within the details may necessitate the asking price change your software? You can now set your shutdown code of archway station with a better home loan amount needs whether you are never far away from savills. This spacious reception room with english grub or with weston park which pages you can we encourage a short walk. One even acquaintances had been sent to find out her husband. Thinking about being in crouch end in to buy in. The sale category, for property sale crouch end and sale in and hampstead, add your email address and rental properties match your login. June last house retaining many original features you can let your account or click to crouch end for property sale crouch hill. The property features, a instant notifications when he is looking for more features of crouch end is a list. Find available to use cookies allow you planning to your country estates to provide users, market for us with respect to. Jamaican family home is at the sales in excellent prime central green. We have no properties that meets your property for. What is all information to connect you visited this excellent natural light. Location moments away from savills, then all areas including without limitation any of property for sale crouch end warehouses for trusting us know which will be interested in.
  • All Approved Premises

    All Approved Premises

    All Approved Premises Local Authority Name District Name and Telephone Number Name Address Telephone BARKING AND DAGENHAM BARKING AND DAGENHAM 0208 227 3666 EASTBURY MANOR HOUSE EASTBURY SQUARE, BARKING, 1G11 9SN 0208 227 3666 THE CITY PAVILION COLLIER ROW ROAD, COLLIER ROW, ROMFORD, RM5 2BH 020 8924 4000 WOODLANDS WOODLAND HOUSE, RAINHAM ROAD NORTH, DAGENHAM 0208 270 4744 ESSEX, RM10 7ER BARNET BARNET 020 8346 7812 AVENUE HOUSE 17 EAST END ROAD, FINCHLEY, N3 3QP 020 8346 7812 CAVENDISH BANQUETING SUITE THE HYDE, EDGWARE ROAD, COLINDALE, NW9 5AE 0208 205 5012 CLAYTON CROWN HOTEL 142-152 CRICKLEWOOD BROADWAY, CRICKLEWOOD 020 8452 4175 LONDON, NW2 3ED FINCHLEY GOLF CLUB NETHER COURT, FRITH LANE, MILL HILL, NW7 1PU 020 8346 5086 HENDON HALL HOTEL ASHLEY LANE, HENDON, NW4 1HF 0208 203 3341 HENDON TOWN HALL THE BURROUGHS, HENDON, NW4 4BG 020 83592000 PALM HOTEL 64-76 HENDON WAY, LONDON, NW2 2NL 020 8455 5220 THE ADAM AND EVE THE RIDGEWAY, MILL HILL, LONDON, NW7 1RL 020 8959 1553 THE HAVEN BISTRO AND BAR 1363 HIGH ROAD, WHETSTONE, N20 9LN 020 8445 7419 THE MILL HILL COUNTRY CLUB BURTONHOLE LANE, NW7 1AS 02085889651 THE QUADRANGLE MIDDLESEX UNIVERSITY, HENDON CAMPUS, HENDON 020 8359 2000 NW4 4BT BARNSLEY BARNSLEY 01226 309955 ARDSLEY HOUSE HOTEL DONCASTER ROAD, ARDSLEY, BARNSLEY, S71 5EH 01226 309955 BARNSLEY FOOTBALL CLUB GROVE STREET, BARNSLEY, S71 1ET 01226 211 555 BOCCELLI`S 81 GRANGE LANE, BARNSLEY, S71 5QF 01226 891297 BURNTWOOD COURT HOTEL COMMON ROAD, BRIERLEY, BARNSLEY, S72 9ET 01226 711123 CANNON HALL MUSEUM BARKHOUSE LANE, CAWTHORNE,
  • Haringey Register of Local Listed Buildings

    Haringey Register of Local Listed Buildings

    REGISTER OF LOCAL LISTED BUILDINGS OF MERIT • Denotes inclusion as Grade III in Tottenham Provisional List 22 July 1949 ° Denotes inclusion as Grade III in Hornsey Provisional List 19 March 1951 ∗ Denotes inclusion as part of conservation area designation Various Register included as part of DoE Listing Submission 11 June 1973 Register updated in Haringey Borough District Plan 1 September 1976 Register further reviewed as part of the U. D. P Review 27 January 1997 Designated Sites of Industrial Heritage Interest (GLIAS) 1 May 2004 Total number of buildings: 1,177 (of which 100 are outside conservation areas) Street Address Conservation Area No. Date Included A Alexandra Palace Way N22 Bridge under disused railway (part of Parkland Walk) 13 1 May 2004 Archway Road, Highgate N6 Nos. 162 to 198 (even) Grand Parade 1 25 September 1986 ∗ Nos. 200 to 206 (even) Grand Parade 1 27 January 1997 Nos. 278 to 310 (even) 1 27 January 1997 No. 412 1 25 September 1986 ∗ No. 414 (Woodman Public House) 1 25 September 1986 ∗ Nos. 422 & 424 1 11 June 1973 Nos. 438 & 440 1 11 June 1973 Nos. 203 to 223 (odd) 1 27 January 1997 Nos. 253 to 263 (odd) 1 27 January 1997 Disused 1940 Highgate Interchange Station (Parkland Walk between Wood Lane & Shepherd’s Hill) 1 1 May 2004 2 Disused Twin Tunnels & 4 Twin Portals (Parkland Walk west & east of interchange station) 1 1 May 2004 Ashley Road N17 No. 25 (Berol House) (former Eagle Pencil Works) none 1 May 2004 The Avenue, Muswell Hill N10 Former Alexandra Palace Rail Station Building 13 27 January 1997 B Back Lane, Crouch End N8 Nos.