Phd Thesis Prospecting a Predator

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Phd Thesis Prospecting a Predator UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGY PhD thesis Klara Junker Prospecting a Predator: Exploration of the biocontrol potential of the mycoparasitic yeast Saccharomycopsis schoenii and an integrated microscopic and multiomic characterization of its predatory behaviour Supervisor: Birgitte Regenberg, University of Copenhagen Co-supervisor: Jürgen Wendland, Vrije Universiteit, Brussel This thesis has been submitted to the PhD School of The Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen on the 6th of July, 2018 Name of department: Department of Biology Author: Klara Junker Title and subtitle: Prospecting a predator: Exploration of the biocontrol potential of the mycoparasitic yeast Saccharomycopsis schoenii and an integrated microscopic and multiomic characterization of its predatory behaviour Supervisor: Assoc. Prof. Birgitte Regenberg Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark Co-supervisor: Prof. Jürgen Wendland Research Group of Microbiology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium Submitted on: The 6th of July, 2018 Assessment committee: Assoc. Prof. Rasmus Kjøller Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark Dr. Alexandra Brand MRC Centre for Medical Mycology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland Dr. Gianni Liti Institute of Research on Cancer and Ageing of Nice, CNRS, INSERM, Université de Nice, Nice, France ”Klara klarar allt” ~ Siri Johansson ~ In dedication to my grandmother Siri Johansson, 26/4 1916 ~ 14/11 2017 Det här är resultatet av möjligheter jag önskar du också fått Prospecting a Predator | Klara Junker Table of contents Preface ............................................................................................... 7 Summary .......................................................................................... 8 Resumé ............................................................................................ 10 List of papers ................................................................................. 12 Aim & objectives ........................................................................... 13 Introduction .................................................................................... 14 1. Introduction to fungi ............................................................................................. 14 1.1. Fungal nutrition ................................................................................................ 17 1.2. Nutrient acquisition tactics ........................................................................... 18 1.3. Mycoparasitism ................................................................................................ 19 1.4. Biocontrol fungi .............................................................................................. 20 1.5. The fungal cell wall ....................................................................................... 22 1.6. Fungal parasite genomics ........................................................................... 23 1.7. Human fungal pathogens ........................................................................... 24 2. Yeasts ....................................................................................................................... 25 2.1. Saccharomyces cerevisiae: the model yeast organism .................... 25 2.2. Human yeast pathogens in the Candida genus .................................. 26 2.3. Candida albicans: a commensal yeast in CTG clade ......................... 26 2.4. Candida auris: an emerging multidrug resistant pathogen ............. 28 2.5. Saccharomycopsis yeasts: necrotrophic mycoparasites .................. 29 5 Klara Junker | Prospecting a Predator Materials & methods ................................................................. 32 1. Strains & culture conditions .............................................................................. 32 2. Live cell microscopy ............................................................................................. 34 3. Genome sequencing & assembly .................................................................... 36 4. Genome annotation ............................................................................................. 37 5. Proteomic analyses ............................................................................................. 39 6. Transcriptomic analyses .................................................................................... 40 7. GO term analysis ................................................................................................... 41 8. Genetic manipulations of S. schoenii .............................................................. 42 Summary of papers .................................................................... 43 Results & Discussion .................................................................. 46 Perspectives for further research ............................................................................ 55 Conclusions .................................................................................... 57 Acknowledgements .................................................................... 58 References ..................................................................................... 62 Papers ............................................................................................. 68 Paper I ............................................................................................................................. 69 Paper II ............................................................................................................................. 73 Paper III ............................................................................................................................ 77 Paper IV ......................................................................................................................... 103 6 Prospecting a Predator | Klara Junker Preface This work was funded by the Marie Curie Initial Training Network “FUNGIBRAIN”, Grant agreement no. 607963, from the European Union. The majority of research was carried out in the Yeast and Fermentation group at the Carlsberg Research Laboratory, Copenhagen, Denmark. Work with clinical isolates of Candida species, S. cerevisiae and S. pombe was performed in collaboration with Neil Gow, Alexander Lorenz and Gustavo Bravo of the Aberdeen Fungal Group, at the University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK. 7 Klara Junker | Prospecting a Predator Summary Fungal infections have in the recent years gone from being associated to minor annoyances, to being recognized as a diverse group of emerging killers, now even outnumbering the death toll of malaria. The human body is adept at keeping fungal pathogens at bay, but when our immune system is down, pathogenic yeast can infect and even kill us. One of the most recently emerging pathogens, the yeast Candida auris, was first described in Japan in 2009, but has already spread across the globe. In addition, several strains of C. auris are multi drug resistant. Development of antifungal drugs has been even less prioritized than the development of new bacterial antibiotics, but the need for novel strategies to combat fungal infections is real. This thesis explores the antifungal mechanisms and potentials of Saccharomycopsis schoenii, a little-studied mycoparasitic yeast with the rare ability to attack and kill other fungi including, as I demonstrate, multi drug resistant C. auris. Fungi are diverse in the way they feed themselves. Some filamentous fungi parasitize on plants, whereas yet others are mycoparasites, meaning that they can parasitize on other fungi. A common feature of these parasites is that they have often lost the genes that allow them to synthesise essential nutrients that they instead are able to acquire from their hosts. In parallel, they have increased the copy numbers of genes that allow them to parasitize. For instance, filamentous fungi in the mycoparasitic genus Trichoderma, used as biocontrol agents against fungal plant pathogens, have expanded gene families encoding for cell wall degrading enzymes, that they use when they antagonize or kill other fungi. Similarly, the yeast pathogen C. albicans also use an expanded set of proteases when it infects humans. In this thesis I made use of state-of-the-art next generation sequencing and bioinformatics as well as live cell imaging techniques with the aim of genetically and functionally characterizing Saccharomycopsis yeasts. We first generated draft genomes of three Saccharomycopsis yeasts, S. fodiens, S. fermentans and S. schoenii and found that the genomic reason that these yeasts, unlike all other yeasts, are unable to assimilate inorganic sulfate is because they lack all genes in the sulfate assimilation pathway. In parallel, we also found that they, analogous to filamentous mycoparasitic fungi, have expanded their sets of genes encoding proteases, chitinases and glucanases that can break down fungal cell walls. 8 Prospecting a Predator | Klara Junker Through genomic analyses, we also found special tRNA-genes in the Saccharomycopsis yeasts, that suggested they belong to the CTG clade, a group of yeasts that translate the CTG codon to serine instead of leucine. We were able to confirm the translation of CTG to serine, through a proteomic assay. By means of live microscopy, I provided spatial and temporal visualization of how the S. schoenii attacks and kills S. cerevisiae, a model prey cell. Through microscopy-based
Recommended publications
  • Supplementary Materials For
    Electronic Supplementary Material (ESI) for RSC Advances. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2019 Supplementary materials for: Fungal community analysis in the seawater of the Mariana Trench as estimated by Illumina HiSeq Zhi-Peng Wang b, †, Zeng-Zhi Liu c, †, Yi-Lin Wang d, Wang-Hua Bi c, Lu Liu c, Hai-Ying Wang b, Yuan Zheng b, Lin-Lin Zhang e, Shu-Gang Hu e, Shan-Shan Xu c, *, Peng Zhang a, * 1 Tobacco Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Qingdao, 266101, China 2 Key Laboratory of Sustainable Development of Polar Fishery, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Yellow Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Qingdao, 266071, China 3 School of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266003, China. 4 College of Science, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao, Shandong 266580, China. 5 College of Chemistry & Environmental Engineering, Shandong University of Science & Technology, Qingdao, 266510, China. a These authors contributed equally to this work *Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed Supplementary Table S1. Read counts of OTUs in different sampled sites. OTUs M1.1 M1.2 M1.3 M1.4 M3.1 M3.2 M3.4 M4.2 M4.3 M4.4 M7.1 M7.2 M7.3 Total number OTU1 13714 398 5405 671 11604 3286 3452 349 3560 2537 383 2629 3203 51204 OTU2 6477 2203 2188 1048 2225 1722 235 1270 2564 5258 7149 7131 3606 43089 OTU3 165 39 13084 37 81 7 11 11 2 176 289 4 2102 16021 OTU4 642 4347 439 514 638 191 170 179 0 1969 570 678 0 10348 OTU5 28 13 4806 7 44 151 10 620 3
    [Show full text]
  • D-Fructose Assimilation and Fermentation by Yeasts
    microorganisms Article D-Fructose Assimilation and Fermentation by Yeasts Belonging to Saccharomycetes: Rediscovery of Universal Phenotypes and Elucidation of Fructophilic Behaviors in Ambrosiozyma platypodis and Cyberlindnera americana Rikiya Endoh *, Maiko Horiyama and Moriya Ohkuma Microbe Division/Japan Collection of Microorganisms, RIKEN BioResource Research Center (RIKEN BRC-JCM), 3-1-1 Koyadai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0074, Japan; [email protected] (M.H.); [email protected] (M.O.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The purpose of this study was to investigate the ability of ascomycetous yeasts to as- similate/ferment D-fructose. This ability of the vast majority of yeasts has long been neglected since the standardization of the methodology around 1950, wherein fructose was excluded from the standard set of physiological properties for characterizing yeast species, despite the ubiquitous presence of fructose in the natural environment. In this study, we examined 388 strains of yeast, mainly belonging to the Saccharomycetes (Saccharomycotina, Ascomycota), to determine whether they can assimilate/ferment D-fructose. Conventional methods, using liquid medium containing Citation: Endoh, R.; Horiyama, M.; yeast nitrogen base +0.5% (w/v) of D-fructose solution for assimilation and yeast extract-peptone Ohkuma, M. D-Fructose Assimilation +2% (w/v) fructose solution with an inverted Durham tube for fermentation, were used. All strains and Fermentation by Yeasts examined (n = 388, 100%) assimilated D-fructose, whereas 302 (77.8%) of them fermented D-fructose. Belonging to Saccharomycetes: D D Rediscovery of Universal Phenotypes In addition, almost all strains capable of fermenting -glucose could also ferment -fructose. These and Elucidation of Fructophilic results strongly suggest that the ability to assimilate/ferment D-fructose is a universal phenotype Behaviors in Ambrosiozyma platypodis among yeasts in the Saccharomycetes.
    [Show full text]
  • Outline of Ascomycota - 2007
    ISSN 1403-1418 VOLUME 13 DECEMBER 31, 2007 Outline of Ascomycota - 2007 H. Thorsten Lumbsch and Sabine M. Huhndorf (eds.) The Field Museum, Department of Botany, Chicago, USA Abstract Lumbsch, H. T. and S.M. Huhndorf (ed.) 2007. Outline of Ascomycota – 2007. Myconet 13: 1 - 58. The present classification contains all accepted genera and higher taxa above the generic level in phylum Ascomycota. Introduction The present classification is based in part on earlier versions published in Systema Ascomycetum and Myconet (see http://www.fieldmuseum.org/myconet/) and reflects the numerous changes made in the Deep Hypha issue of Mycologia (Spatafora et al. 2006), in Hibbett et al. (2007) and those listed in Myconet Notes Nos. 4408-4750 (Lumbsch & Huhndorf 2007). It includes all accepted genera and higher taxa of Ascomycota. New synonymous generic names are included in the outline. In future outlines attempts will be made to incorporate all synonymous generic names (for a list of synonymous generic names, see Eriksson & Hawksworth 1998). A question mark (?) indicates that the position of the taxon is uncertain. Eriksson O.E. & Hawksworth D.L. 1998. Outline of the ascomycetes - 1998. - Systema Ascomycetum 16: 83-296. Hibbett, D.S., Binder, M., Bischoff, J.F., Blackwell, M., Cannon, P.F., Eriksson, O.E., Huhndorf, S., James, T., Kirk, P.M., Lucking, R., Lumbsch, H.T., Lutzoni, F., Matheny, P.B., McLaughlin, D.J., Powell, M.J., Redhead, S., Schoch, C.L., Spatafora, J.W., Stalpers, J.A., Vilgalys, R., Aime, M.C., Aptroot, A., Bauer, R., Begerow, D.,
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetics of Saccharomycetales, the Ascomycete Yeasts
    Mycologia, 98(6), 2006, pp. 1006–1017. # 2006 by The Mycological Society of America, Lawrence, KS 66044-8897 Phylogenetics of Saccharomycetales, the ascomycete yeasts Sung-Oui Suh Key words: Hemiascomycetes, rDNA, systematics Meredith Blackwell1,2 Department of Biological Sciences, Louisiana State INTRODUCTION University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803 The subphylum Saccharomycotina contains a single Cletus P. Kurtzman order, the Saccharomycetales (FIG.1,TABLE I). These Microbial Genomics and Bioprocessing Research, National Center for Agricultural Utilization Research, ascomycetes have had a significant role in human ARS/USDA, Peoria, Illinois 61604-3999 activities for millennia. Records from the Middle East, as well as from China, depict brewing and Marc-Andre´ Lachance bread making 8000–10 000 years ago (McGovern et al Department of Biology, Western Ontario University, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5B7 2004, http://www.museum.upenn.edu/new/exhibits/ online_exhibits/wine/wineintro.html). These early ‘‘biotechnologists’’ had no idea why bread dough rose Abstract: Ascomycete yeasts (phylum Ascomycota: or why beer fermented. The explanation awaited subphylum Saccharomycotina: class Saccharomycetes: Antonie van Leeuwenhoek (1680), who showed with order Saccharomycetales) comprise a monophyletic his microscope that small cells that were to become lineage with a single order of about 1000 known known as yeasts were present and further for Louis species. These yeasts live as saprobes, often in Pasteur (1857) to demonstrate conclusively that yeasts association with plants, animals and their interfaces. caused the fermentation of grape juice to wine. A few species account for most human mycotic What is a yeast? —Yeasts eventually were recognized infections, and fewer than 10 species are plant as fungi, prompting description of the ‘‘sugar pathogens.
    [Show full text]