DOCSLIB.ORG

ESPON Project 2.3.1 Application and Effects of the ESDP in the Member States

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ESPON Project 2.3.1 Application and Effects of the ESDP in the Member States ESPON project 2.3.1 Application and effects of the ESDP in the Member States Co-financed by the European Community through the Interreg III ESPON Programme The present Final Report of the ESPON project 2.3.1 is a team effort of all project partners and subcontractors under the leadership of Nordregio. Project partners belonging to the core team Project partners Austrian Institute for Regional Studies and Spatial Planning (ÖIR) Spatial Development and Research Unit (SDRU), Aristotle University of Thessaloniki Sub-contractors AUREX, spol. s r.o. Department of Geography, University of Valencia ETH Zürich The Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Maribor Institute of Spatial Planning (ÚÚR) Institute of Social Sciences (ICS) National Institute for Regional and Spatial Analysis (NIRSA) Réseau Interdisciplinaire pour l'Aménagement du Territoire Européen (RIATE) - Unité Mixte de Service 2412 RKK Centre for Regional Studies, Hungarian Academy of Sciences Stanislaw Leszczycki Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization (IGSO) Contact: Michael Viehhauser Nordregio – Nordic Centre for Spatial Development Box 1658; SE-111 86 Stockholm Tel. +46 8 463 54 00; email [email protected] Website www.nordregio.se ESPON project 2.3.1 Application and effects of the ESDP in the Member States This report represents the final results of a research project conducted within the framework of the ESPON 2000-2006 programme, partly financed through the INTERREG III ESPON 2006 programme. The partnership behind the ESPON programme consists of the EU Commission and the Member States of the EU25, plus Norway and Switzerland. Each country and the Commission are represented in the ESPON Monitoring Committee. This report does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the members of the Monitoring Committee. Information on the ESPON programme and projects can be found on www.espon.eu The web site provides the possibility to download and examine the most recent document produced by finalised and ongoing ESPON projects. ISBN number: 91-89332-61-X This basic report exists only in an electronic version. Word version: © The ESPON Monitoring Committee and the partners of the projects mentioned. Printing, reproduction or quotation is authorized provided the source is acknowledged and a copy is forwarded to the ESPON Coordination Unit in Luxembourg. Foreword This is the third and Final Report of ESPON project 2.3.1 “Application and effects of the ESDP in the Member States”. The national Ministers responsible for Spatial Planning adopted the ESDP (European Spatial Development Perspective), in May 1999 in Potsdam (Germany). The focus of this study is on the assessment of the means, ways, and effects of ESDP application in the European Union plus the accession countries Bulgaria, Rumania as well as Norway and Switzerland. The current project is part of the ESPON Programme, which is implemented in the framework of the Community Initiative INTERREG III. Under the overall control of Luxembourg, the EU Member States have elaborated a joint application with the title "The ESPON 2006 Programme – Research on the Spatial Development of an Enlarging European Union". The European Commission adopted the programme on 3 June 2002. See http://www.espon.eu/ for more details. The views expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the ESPON Monitoring Committee. The project was coordinated by Nordregio (Nordic Centre for Spatial Development). The members of the trans-national project group (TPG), as partners or subcontractors1, include: Nordregio, Sweden: Ole Damsgaard [MA], Michael Viehhauser [MA, NR], Sigrid Hedin [MA, CS], Åsa Pettersson [MA], Patrick Lindblom [MA], Hólmfrídur Bjarnadóttir [CS], Malin Hansen [NR], Riikka Ikonen [NR, CS], Søren Smidt-Jensen [NR], Ralfs Spade [NR], Nijole Valeviciene [NR] and Rasa Sukeviciute [NR] EuroFutures, Sweden: Hallgeir Aalbu [MA] and Jenny Björinge [MA] Institute for Spatial Planning (IRPUD), Germany: Peter Ache [MA, NR, CS], Stefan Peters [MA], Christian Lindner [OT] and Michael Höweler [OT] Catholic University Leuven, Belgium: Louis Albrechts [MA] Austrian Institute for Regional Studies and Spatial Planning (ÖIR), Austria: Gabriele Tatzberger [CS] and Friedrich Schindegger [NR] OTB Research Institute for Housing, Urban and Mobility Studies, Delft University of Technology, the Netherlands: Bas Waterhout [MA, NR, CS], Dominic Stead [MA], Evert Meijers [MA] and Wil Zonneveld [MA] 1 Project functions: MA=main/analytical part; NR=national report; CS=case studies; OT=other PhDB Consultant, Belgium: Philippe De Boe [MA, NR, CS] and Thérèse Hanquet [MA, NR, CS] Politecnico di Torino, Italy: Umberto Janin Rivolin [MA, OT], Giuseppe Dematteis [MA, OT], Cristiana Rossignolo [CS, OT], Carlo Salone [NR, OT], Giancarlo Cotella [NR], Loris Servillo [NR, CS] and Alessia Toldo [CS, OT] Spatial Development and Research Unit (SDRU), Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece: Grigoris Kafkalas, Eleni Andrikopoulou [NR, CS], Ilia Kopralev [NR], Poli Roukova [NR], John Pissourios [NR, CS], Valentina Dumitru [NR] Department of Civic Design, University of Liverpool, United Kingdom: David Shaw [MA] and Olivier Sykes [MA] AUREX, spol. s r.o., Slovakia: Vojtech Hrdina [NR, CS] and Dušan Kostovský [OT] ETH Zürich, Switzerland: Marco Keiner [NR, CS] Stanislaw Leszczycki Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization (IGSO), Poland: Piotr Korcelli [NR, CS] and Tomasz Komornicki [NR, CS] RKK Centre for Regional Studies, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Hungary: Iván Illés [NR, CS] and Gyula Horváth [NR, CS] Réseau Interdisciplinaire pour l'Aménagement du Territoire Européen (RIATE) – Unité Mixte de Service 2412, France: Frédéric Santamaria [NR, CS] Department of Geography, University of Valencia, Spain: Joaquín Farinós Dasí [NR, CS] Juan Romero González [CS, NR] and Jody Milder [OT] The Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Maribor, Slovenia: Metka Sitar [NP], Kaja Pogacar [CS] Institute of Spatial Planning, ÚÚR, Czech Republic: Igor Kyselka [CS] and Josef Markvart [NR] Institute of Social Sciences (ICS), Portugal: João Ferrão [NR, CS] and João Mourato [NR, CS] National Institute for Regional and Spatial Analysis (NIRSA), Ireland: Brendan Bartley [NR, CS] and Jim Walsh [NR, CS] Table of contents 1. Executive summary ...........................................................................................4 1.1 Methodological approach............................................................................................................4 1.2 Major ESDP contents .................................................................................................................5 1.3 Scientific literature assessment ..................................................................................................7 1.4 ESDP application at the European level .....................................................................................8 1.4.1 The implementation of TEAP......................................................................................................8 1.4.2 Impact of ESDP on EU sectorial policies and programmes ......................................................11 1.4.3 CEMAT as pan-European application of the ESDP ..................................................................12 1.5 Trans-national and cross-border level.......................................................................................13 1.6 ESDP application at the national and regional levels................................................................14 1.6.1 Application mainly within spatial planning at the national level .................................................16 1.6.2 Variations in timing, awareness and between regions ..............................................................19 1.7 Case studies highlighting ESDP application .............................................................................21 1.8 Policy conclusions and recommendations ................................................................................23 2 Scientific summary - the main concepts and methodologies ....................27 2.1 Guiding key concepts and terms...............................................................................................27 2.2 ESDP application studies at different geographical levels ........................................................30 2.3 Synthesis and policy recommendations....................................................................................37 3 Networking .............................................................................................38 4 Further Research Issues .........................................................................41 5 Introduction ...........................................................................................44 5.1 ESDP – the main contents........................................................................................................44 5.2 How the ESDP itself conceives of its own application...............................................................46 5.3 Terminology..............................................................................................................................47 6 Methodology ...........................................................................................49 6.1 Structure of the project .............................................................................................................49 6.2 Introduction to methodological approach ..................................................................................50
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Luxembourgish Small and Medium-Sized Town in Europe : Challenges and Opportunities
    West Luxembourgish Small and Medium-Sized Towns Europe in Europe: Challenges and Opportunities Small and Medium-Sized Towns: Facts and Figures Europe is a highly “urbanised” continent. Cities form the backbone of the European territory and are key actors in implementing EU and national policies. Alongside the larger cities, small and medium-sized towns play an important role in regional development across Europe. They contribute to greater social cohesion and concurrently represent the economic pillars and drivers in the EU. Towns and cities in the EU are facing different challenges. Whilst some are seeing their population decline, others have a rather fast growing population, which intensifies problems such as increasing unemployment or environmen- tal pollution. The same applies to economic development: some towns show strong economic growth whilst others have to deal with a shrinking economy. Nevertheless, small and medium-sized towns (SMSTs) could offer opportunities to increase the resilience of the re- gions they are situated in by promoting their potential in fields such as employment creation or social cohesion. Map 1: Prevailing type of settlements in terms of population SMSTs features • Population threshold be- tween 5.000 and 50.000 inhabitants • Population density be- tween 300 and 1.500 in- habitants/km² • 24,2% lives in Small and Medium-Sized Towns General urban features • 87% of population lives in urban areas in EU27 (plus ESPON Partner States) • 46,3% lives in Larger Cit- ies (High Density Urban Clusters ,HDUC) • 19% lives in Very Small Towns (below 5.000 in- habitants) • Total numbers (EU): › 850 Larger Cities (HDUCs) › 8.414 SMSTs › More than 69.000 Very Small Towns English Small and medium-sized towns in Europe Domain 4 “Equity”: European small and medium-sized towns (SMSTs) are › Lower unemployment rates compared to HDUCs hardly considered subjects in EU policy, yet are recog- Domain 5 “Culture and community”: nisable in the everyday experience of European citizens and companies.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Compendium
    Country Compendium A companion to the English Style Guide July 2021 Translation © European Union, 2011, 2021. The reproduction and reuse of this document is authorised, provided the sources and authors are acknowledged and the original meaning or message of the texts are not distorted. The right holders and authors shall not be liable for any consequences stemming from the reuse. CONTENTS Introduction ...............................................................................1 Austria ......................................................................................3 Geography ................................................................................................................... 3 Judicial bodies ............................................................................................................ 4 Legal instruments ........................................................................................................ 5 Government bodies and administrative divisions ....................................................... 6 Law gazettes, official gazettes and official journals ................................................... 6 Belgium .....................................................................................9 Geography ................................................................................................................... 9 Judicial bodies .......................................................................................................... 10 Legal instruments .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Atlas of Inequalities in Europe Scale and Trends in Main Dimensions of Inequality in Europe
    UPLIFT – Urban PoLicy Innovation to address inequality with and for Future generaTions Deliverable 1.3 Atlas of inequalities in Europe Scale and trends in main dimensions of inequality in Europe December 2020 This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 870898. UPLIFT (870898) Deliverable 1.3 Atlas of Inequalities in Europe Project title UPLIFT – Urban PoLicy Innovation to address inequality with and for Future generaTions Grant Agreement No. 870898 Project duration January 2020-December 2022 Project website http://uplift-youth.eu Project coordinator Metropolitan Research Institute WP 1 Overview of the drivers, dimensions and trends of urban inequalities in Europe WP duration January 2020-December 2020 Deliverable title D1.3. Atlas of inequalities in Europe Lead partner TARKI Social Research Institute (Márton Medgyesi, Borbála Hegyi) Contributors University of Tartu (David Knapp, Tiit Tammaru), Uppsala University (Roger Andersson, Kati Kadarik) Date of submission 31/12/2020 Dissemination level Public The sole responsibility for the content of this publication lies with the authors. It does not necessarily represent the opinion of the European Union. Neither the EASME nor the European Commission is responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. 2 UPLIFT (870898) Deliverable 1.3 Atlas of Inequalities in Europe Table of contents 1 Executive Summary .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Partnership List 2012
    Regional Partnerships Adriatic-Ionian Macroregion Abruzzo (IT), Basilicata (IT), Dubrovnik - Neretva Region (HR), Emilia-Romagna (IT), Canton of Herzegovina- Neretva (BA), Marche (IT), Molise (IT), Districts of Nišava, Toplica and Pirot (RS), Puglia (IT), Sicily (IT), Republic of Slovenia (SI), Republika Srpska (BA), Sumadija-Pomoravlje Districts (RS) Advanced Co-operation in the North Sea-English Channel Area Lower Saxony (DE), Noord-Holland (NL), North Denmark (DK), Northern Netherlands Provinces (NL), South Norway (NO), Southern England (UK), Upper Normandy (FR), Zuid-Holland (NL) Atlantic Regions Alliance Aquitaine (FR), Basque Country (ES), Brittany Region (FR), Cantabria (ES), Finistère (FR), Irish Regions (IE), Lisbon and Tagus Valley (PT), Liverpool (UK), Navarra (ES), Pays de la Loire (FR), Poitou-Charentes (FR), Wales (UK) Baltic Sea Group East-Sweden (SE), City of Malmö (SE), Mecklenburg-Vorpommern (DE), Schleswig-Holstein (DE), Szczecin (PL), Tallinn City (EE), West Finland (FI), Westpomerania (PL), Zealand (DK) Be SMART - think CITY! Aragon (ES), Basque Smart Cities (Vitoria-Gasteiz, Bilbao, Donostia-San Sebastián) (ES), City of Helsinki (FI), City of Łódź (PL), Lubelskie Region (PL), Pomorskie (PL), City of Riga (LV), Sardinia (IT), Silesia (PL), Sofia (BG), South Sweden (SE), City of Vejle (DK) Border regions making a difference Alentejo (PT), East Border Region (IE/UK), Extremadura (ES), Hedmark County (NO), Olomouc Region (CZ), Opolskie Region (PL), Öresund Region (DK/SE), Värmland (SE), City of Varna (BG) Capital Cities
    [Show full text]
  • ESPON Project 2.3.1 Application and Effects of the ESDP in the Member States
    ESPON project 2.3.1 Application and effects of the ESDP in the Member States 3 Co-financed by the European Community through the Interreg III ESPON Programme Nordregio EuroFutures Institute for Spatial Planning (IRPUD) Catholic University Leuven Austrian Institute for Regional Studies and Spatial Planning (ÖIR) OTB Research Institute for Housing, Urban and Mobility Studies, Delft University of Technology PhDB Consultant Politecnico di Torino Spatial Development and Research Unit (SDRU) University of Liverpool AUREX ETH Zürich Stanislaw Leszczycki Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization (IGSO) RKK Réseau Interdisciplinaire pour l'Aménagement du Territoire Européen (RIATE) - Unité Mixte de Service 2412 Department of Geography, University of Valencia The Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Maribor Institute of Spatial Planning (ÚÚR) Institute of Social Sciences (ICS) National Institute for Regional and Spatial Analysis (NIRSA) 4 ESPON project 2.3.1 Application and effects of the ESDP in the Member States 5 This report represents the final results of a research project conducted within the framework of the ESPON 2000-2006 programme, partly financed through the INTERREG programme. The partnership behind the ESPON programme consists of the EU Commission and the Member States of the EU25, plus Norway and Switzerland. Each partner is represented in the ESPON Monitoring Committee. This report does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the members of the Monitoring Committee. Information on the ESPON programme and projects can be found on www.espon.lu” The web side provides the possibility to download and examine the most recent document produced by finalised and ongoing ESPON projects. ISBN number: This basic report exists only in an electronic version.
    [Show full text]
  • Background Report
    Working Group on Innovative Solutions to Cross Border obstacles July 2016 – July 2017 BACKGROUND REPORT 1 INTRODUCTION Following the Luxembourg Presidency of the Council of the EU (2nd half of 2015) and its proposal to create a new legal tool for cross-border cooperation, the Working Group on Innovative Solutions to Cross-Border Obstacles has been established by Luxembourg and France. Under the Dutch Presidency (1st half of 2016), the Working Group was presented to the Directors- General in charge of Territorial Cohesion and of Urban Matters on 11th and 12th May 2016. At this occasion, it received a mandate to further investigate innovative solutions to overcome cross-border obstacles, with a particular focus on the added value, feasibility and design of the tool presented under the Luxembourg Presidency. The first meeting of the Working Group was held in Vienna on 5th July 2016. Conceived as an intergovernmental platform in a structured dialogue with the EU institutions, the Group included representatives from 12 Member States, 1 Partner State and 2 stakeholders in 5 meetings to work on the identification of obstacles to cross-border cooperation and innovative solutions to overcome them. Representatives of the European institutions – the European Commission, the European Parliament, the Committee of the Regions, the European Investment Bank – were invited to present their work on solving cross-border obstacles and discuss with the members of the Working Group how to tackle these challenges together. The detailed reports of each meeting are available on MOT website. Today, the Working Group presents a report on its activities, including recommendations on the European Cross-Border Convention (ECBC) procedure and tool, and a European multilevel platform to exchange problem-solving methods from different parts of Europe and foster the exchange of experiences and best practices.
    [Show full text]
  • Proquest Dissertations
    ANALYZING THE EFFECTS OF MICROREGIONS ON MACROREGIONS: CAN EUROREGIONS LEGITIMIZE THE EUROPEAN UNION? By Aaron Russell Martin Submitted to the Faculty of the School of International Service of American University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts In International Affairs Chair: J \fam~ tv'itTTBLM·A-N ~ Dr. James Mittelman, Ph.D ' k.w~~ Dean Louis W. Goodman, School of International Service aooq 2009 American University Washington, D.C. 20016 AMERICAN UNiViRSITY LIBRARY UMI Number: 1468490 INFORMATION TO USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleed-through, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will .indicate the deletion. UMI® UMI Microform 1468490 Copyright 2009 by ProQuest LLC All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 ANALYZING THE EFFECTS OF MICROREGIONS ON MACROREGIONS: CAN EUROREGIONS LEGITIMIZE THE EUROPEAN UNION? BY Aaron Russell Martin ABSTRACT As a polity, the European Union (EU) is lacking in political legitimacy. Several failed referenda indicate that certain majorities within EU member states have actively rejected European treaties and concordantly, rule by Brussels. This thesis asserts that Euroregions, cross-border cooperative microregions, have the potential to become a local level interface that can connect the marginalized residents of the member states directly to the EU.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 15 the Process
    ET2050 Territorial Scenarios and Visions for Europe Project 2013/1/19 Final Report | 30/06/2014 VOLUME 15 Towards a Territorial Vision (TEVI) “Europe 2050”: the value based process Author: IGEAT-ULB This report presents a more detailed overview of the analytical approach to be applied by the ET2050 ESPON project. This Applied Research Project is conducted within the framework of the ESPON 2013 Programme, partly financed by the European Regional Development Fund. The partnership behind the ESPON Programme consists of the EU Commission and the Member States of the EU27, plus Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland. Each partner is represented in the ESPON Monitoring Committee. The approach presented in the report may not necessarily reflect the opinion of the members of the ESPON Monitoring Committee. Information on the ESPON Programme and projects can be found on www.espon.eu The web site provides the possibility to download and examine the most recent documents produced by finalised and ongoing ESPON projects. This basic report exists only in an electronic version. © ESPON & MCRIT LTD, 2014. Printing, reproduction or quotation is authorised provided the source is acknowledged and a copy is forwarded to the ESPON Coordination Unit in Luxembourg. 2 ESPON 2013 Table of contents 1. Introduction: elaborating a value-based vision informed by fact-based analyses ..................... 4 2. Participatory Process (ParP) ...................................................................................................... 7 2.1 Who?, what?,
    [Show full text]