Delivery Plan for North East Regional Biodiversity Habitat Targets (In Support of the English Biodiversity Strategy) Acknowledgements

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Delivery Plan for North East Regional Biodiversity Habitat Targets (In Support of the English Biodiversity Strategy) Acknowledgements www.naturalengland.org.uk Delivery Plan for North East Regional Biodiversity Habitat Targets (in support of the English Biodiversity Strategy) Acknowledgements This plan has been produced with use of help and information from many people and organisations across the North East of England. This include members and staff from the North East Biodiversity Forum, Natural England, The Environment Agency, Local Biodiversity Partnerships, County Councils, Local Authorities, the North Pennines AONB, Northumberland National Park, Northumberland Coast AONB, RSPB, Durham Wildlife Trust, Northumberland Wildlife Trust, Tees Valley Wildlife Trust, English Heritage, The Woodland Trust, Grassland Trust, INCA, The National Trust, Tarmac Ltd, UK Coal, Lafarge UK. Also individuals such as Dr Janet Simkin, Claire O’Reilly and many others. 2 - Delivery Plan for Regional Biodiversity Habitat Targets Contents Introduction Purpose of the Delivery Plan - 4 Format of Delivery Plan - 5 Notes on target terminology - 5 Implementation of the Delivery Plan - 5 The Habitats Native Woodland - 6 Proposed Delivery Map -14 Wood Pasture and Parkland - 10 Lowland Meadows - 16 Proposed Delivery Map - 22 Upland Hay Meadows - 20 Lowland Dry Acid Grassland - 24 Lowland Calcareous Grassland - 28 Proposed Delivery Map - 36 Lowland Heathland - 32 Lowland Raised Bog - 38 Fens - 41 Proposed Delivery Map - 52 Reedbeds - 46 Coastal and Floodplain Grazing Marsh - 48 Coastal Sand Dunes - 54 Maritime Cliffs and Slopes - 57 Proposed Delivery Map - 62 Saline Lagoons - 60 Upland Calcareous Grassland - 64 Blanket Bog/ Heathland Location: North Pennines AONB Map - 72 Upland Heathland - 66 Northumberland National Blanket Bog - 69 Park Map - 73 Eutrophic Standing Waters - 74 Mesotrophic Lakes - 76 Purple Moor-Grass and Rush Pasture - 78 Delivery Plan for Regional Biodiversity Habitat Targets - 3 North East Biodiversity Forum Delivery Plan for Regional Biodiversity targets Purpose of the Delivery Plan A new set of biodiversity targets for England were produced following on from the UK BAP targets review of 2006. Subsequently each of the English regions signed up to delivering a proportion of the revised habitat targets by 2015. The purpose of this Delivery Plan is to set out how the North East region proposes to achieve its share of the targets. The Delivery Plan contains: • An assessment (where possible) of current progress towards meeting the targets • Proposed delivery mechanisms for achieving the targets • Milestones for the delivery of the targets • Linkages between delivery of the target and landscape-scale biodiversity projects • Specific actions and accountabilities for delivering the regional targets The Delivery Plan will form an important part of the work programme for the North East Biodiversity Forum and inform discussions with the national Biodiversity Integration Groups (BIGs) set up under the England Biodiversity Strategy. The start date for targets is taken to be the year in which the national action plan for a habitat was first published. Depending on the habitat this varies from 1995 to 1999.The end date for all targets is 2015. The Delivery Plan currently only considers UK BAP priority habitats for which a regional disaggregation of targets has been produced. The England Biodiversity Group has not produced a disaggregation for all habitats and some important types are not currently included in this plan (for example salt marsh). 4 - Delivery Plan for Regional Biodiversity Habitat Targets Format of Delivery Plan A Delivery Plan for each individual habitat is provided. These follow a set format: 1) A table showing the (minimum) contribution that the region is expected to make, an estimate of current progress and an estimate of the ‘gap’ that needs to be bridged by 2015 2) A summary of current progress toward meeting the targets for that habitat 3) Proposed delivery mechanisms for targets - a description of how the region intends to meet the targets for the habitat by 2015 4) Additional activity needed – this identifies other associated actions that will be needed if the targets are to be met. These are normally broader and more generic that those actions identified in the section on delivery mechanisms 5) Suggested milestones for meeting the targets by 2015. These milestones are cumulative (i.e. reflect total progress by that date, including work achieved in previous years) 6) Key areas where delivery will take place – this identifies broad geographic areas where action will be focussed in order to deliver the targets . These are normally identified at the level of Joint Character Areas (JCA) 7) Potential barriers to delivery of targets – this identifies any risks to target delivery 8) Other issues with habitat and/or current targets – this identifies any wider issues with the habitat or with the present regional targets 9) Links to landscape-scale projects 10) Summary of key accountabilities/timescales – this identifies a suggested lead organisation for the habitat, who would assist the North East Biodiversity Forum in ensuring the targets are delivered. This section also contains a table setting out key actions and where appropriate identifying specific numeric contributions that organisations will make towards the targets. 11) Support needed from relevant Biodiversity Integration Group (BIG) – this identifies any issues where the region may need help or advice from the national habitat group. Notes on target terminology The regional targets fall into three categories: Expansion targets – these are for creation of new BAP habitat where none was previously present and where no significant relicts of BAP habitat exist Restoration targets – the aim of this is to restore relict areas of degraded or remnant BAP habitat to a state where it is considered to be BAP habitat in good condition Achieving condition targets – the aim is to maintain the quality of existing BAP habitat (where it is good) and improve the condition (if it is poor) of existing BAP habitat. Implementation of the Delivery Plan The Delivery Plan sets out the actions and activities needed to ensure that the region meets its contribution to UK BAP targets. These are a mixture of ongoing projects by a variety of organisations, projects currently in development, and new activities. The scale at which these projects take place varies from individual sites up to the landscape level. Delivery at the landscape level will be an important element of future biodiversity delivery but our biodiversity targets will not be delivered by landscape-scale working alone – the actions identified in this Plan should be viewed as a total delivery package that will require both local and large-scale activity. A number of priority areas for landscape-scale biodiversity delivery are identified within the Plan. These are areas that should be a focus for the expansion and restoration of a mosaic of BAP habitats. These are complementary to the existing landscape-scale delivery undertaken by the Northumberland National Park and the region’s two AONBs. The ongoing work of the National Park and the AONBs is crucial to the implementation of this Plan and should be viewed together with the landscape-scale biodiversity areas as representing the region’s main focus on large-scale biodiversity action Delivery Plan for Regional Biodiversity Habitat Targets - 5 Native woodland Minimum Regional Estimated current Additional gain required target progress to meet minimum regional target by 2015 Restoration target = 184 ha 376 ha 500ha Expansion target = 2960 0 2800ha Current progress Progress has been made on these targets using the England Woodland Grant Scheme. The figures above have been provided by the Forestry Commission and reflect work undertaken through the England Woodland Grant Scheme (EWGS) and through Forest Enterprise initiatives at Kielder Forest. In addition, 330ha of restoration has commenced through Planted Ancient Woodland Sites (PAWS). This work is continuing through gradual transition of woodlands and should be complete by 2015. Significant expansion and restoration of upland woodland types has taken place in the Northumberland National Park through their Challenge Scheme and in the North Pennines AONB Partnership’s Living North Pennines project. In the region’s lowlands, significant expansion of broadleaved woodland was undertaken by the North East Community Forests prior to receivership. What is not recorded here is work undertaken outside the England Woodland Grant Scheme. This largely occurs through planning mitigation measures, through quarry restoration schemes and through agri- environment schemes. This work has proved difficult to capture due to the fragmented nature of the schemes and lack of consistent data capture. These schemes range in size from tiny plantations within developments or farmland, to large scale diverse schemes on opencast sites (e.g. 100 ha expansion on Stockswood and Stedburn opencast) or within green infrastructure developments such as those in North Tyneside. 6 - Delivery Plan for Regional Biodiversity Habitat Targets Planned initiatives Significant woodland expansion will be taking place by the Woodland Trust up to 2015. Some of the largest initiatives include Whitehill Woods (74 ha expansion) and Low Burn Hall (70 ha expansion). Large PAWS restoration schemes include 33 ha at Ragpath, over 100ha at Pont Burn wood and 16 ha at Quaking Houses. Smaller initiatives will be taking place in Tyneside and Teeside. Proposed delivery mechanisms for targets Work under the England Woodland Grant Scheme
Recommended publications
  • (Public Pack)Agenda Document for County Planning Committee, 03/10
    County Planning Committee Date Tuesday 3 October 2017 Time 1.00 pm Venue Council Chamber, County Hall, Durham Business Part A 1. Apologies for absence 2. Substitute Members 3. Declarations of Interest 4. Minutes of the meetings held on 4 and 25 July 2017 (Pages 3 - 34) 5. Applications to be determined a) DM/15/00127/MIN - Thrislington Quarry West, Ferryhill, DL17 9EY (Pages 35 - 102) Extraction of remaining limestone reserves and revised working area for extraction of Basal Permian sand for 15 years until 2030, relocation of internal haul road and a scheme for the progressive and final restoration of the site. 6. Such other business as, in the opinion of the Chairman of the meeting, is of sufficient urgency to warrant consideration 7. Any resolution relating to the exclusion of the public during the discussion of items containing exempt information Part B Items during which it is considered the meeting will not be open to the public (consideration of exempt or confidential information) 8. Such other business as, in the opinion of the Chairman of the meeting, is of sufficient urgency to warrant consideration Helen Lynch Head of Legal and Democratic Services County Hall Durham 25 September 2017 To: The Members of the County Planning Committee Councillor J Robinson (Chairman) Councillor F Tinsley (Vice-Chairman) Councillors A Bell, J Clare, D Hicks, I Jewell, C Kay, A Laing, L Maddison, H Nicholson, G Richardson, A Shield, A Simpson, P Taylor, M Wilkes and S Wilson Contact: Ian Croft Tel: 03000 269702 Agenda Item 4 DURHAM COUNTY COUNCIL At a Meeting of County Planning Committee held in Council Chamber, County Hall, Durham on Tuesday 4 July 2017 at 1.00 pm Present: Councillor F Tinsley (Chairman) Members of the Committee: Councillors A Bell, D Bell, J Clare, D Hicks, C Kay, H Nicholson, G Richardson, A Shield, L Taylor, P Taylor and M Wilkes 1 Apologies for Absence Apologies for absence were received from Councillors I Jewell, A Laing, L Maddison, J Robinson, A Simpson and S Wilson.
    [Show full text]
  • Mavis Dixon VAD Database.Xlsx
    County Durham Voluntary Aid Detachment workers, 1914-1919 www.durhamatwar.org.uk Surname Forename Address Role Further information Service from 2/1915 to 12/1915 and 7/1916 to 8/1917. 13th Durham Margaret Ann Mount Stewart St., V.A.H., Vane House, Seaham Harbour. Husband George William, Coal Lacey Nurse. Part time. 1610 hours worked. (Mrs) Dawdon Miner/Stoneman, son Benjamin. Born Felling c1880. Married 1901 Easington District – maiden name McElwee. Bon Accord, Foggy Furze, Service from 12/1915 to date. 8th Durham V.A.H., Normanhurst, West Ladyman Grace Cook. Part time. 2016 hours worked. West Hartlepool Hartlepool. Not in Hartlepool 1911. C/o Mrs. Atkinson, Service from 1915 to 1/1917. 17th Durham V.A.H., The Red House, Laidler Mary E Wellbank, Morpeth. Sister. Full time. Paid. Etherley, Bishop Auckland. Too many on 1911 census to get a safe Crossed out on the card. match. Service from 1/11/1918 to 1/4/1919. Oulton Hall (Officers’ Hospital), C/o Mrs J Watson, 39 High Waitress. Pay - £26 per annum. Full Laine Emily Leeds. Attd. Military Hospital, Ripon 6/1918 and 7/1918. Not in Crook Jobs Hill, Crook time. on 1911 census. 7 Thornhill Park, Kitchen helper. 30 hours alternate Service from 12/1917 to 2/1919. 3rd Durham V.A.H., Hammerton Laing E. Victoria Sunderland weeks. House, 4 Gray Road, Sunderland. Unable to trace 1911 census. Lake Frank West Park Road, Cleadon Private. Driver. Service from 30/2/1917 to 1919. Unable to trace 1911 census. 15 Rowell St., West Service from 19/2/1917 to 1919.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham Rare Plant Register 2011 Covering VC66 and the Teesdale Part of VC65
    Durham Rare Plant Register 2011 Covering VC66 and the Teesdale part of VC65 JOHN L. DURKIN MSc. MIEEM BSBI Recorder for County Durham 25 May Avenue. Winlaton Mill, Blaydon, NE21 6SF [email protected] Contents Introduction to the rare plants register Notes on plant distribution and protection The individual species accounts in alphabetical order Site Index First published 2010. This is the 2011, second edition. Improvements in the 2011 edition include- An additional 10% records, most of these more recent and more precise. One kilometre resolution maps for upland and coastal species. My thanks to Bob Ellis for advice on mapping. The ―County Scarce‖ species are now incorporated into the main text. Hieracium is now included. This edition is ―regionally aligned‖, that is, several species which are county rare in Northumberland, but were narrowly rejected for the Durham first edition, are now included. There is now a site index. Cover picture—Dark Red Helleborine at Bishop Middleham Quarry, its premier British site. Introduction Many counties are in the process of compiling a County Rare Plant Register, to assist in the study and conservation of their rare species. The process is made easier if the county has a published Flora and a strong Biological Records Centre, and Durham is fortunate to have Gordon Graham's Flora and the Durham Wildlife Trust‘s ―Recorder" system. We also have a Biodiversity project, based at Rainton Meadows, to carry out conservation projects to protect the rare species. The purpose of this document is to introduce the Rare Plant Register and to give an account of the information that it holds, and the species to be included.
    [Show full text]
  • Geometry of the Butterknowle Fault at Bishop Auckland (County Durham, UK), from Gravity Survey and Structural Inversion
    ESSOAr | https:/doi.org/10.1002/essoar.10501104.1 | CC_BY_NC_ND_4.0 | First posted online: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 01:27:37 | This content has not been peer reviewed. Geometry of the Butterknowle Fault at Bishop Auckland (County Durham, UK), from gravity survey and structural inversion Rob Westaway 1,*, Sean M. Watson 1, Aaron Williams 1, Tom L. Harley 2, and Richard Middlemiss 3 1 James Watt School of Engineering, University of Glasgow, James Watt (South) Building, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK. 2 WSP, 70 Chancery Lane, London WC2A 1AF, UK. 3 School of Physics, University of Glasgow, Kelvin Building, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK. * Correspondence: [email protected]; Abstract: The Butterknowle Fault is a major normal fault of Dinantian age in northern England, bounding the Stainmore Basin and the Alston Block. This fault zone has been proposed as a source of deep geothermal energy; to facilitate the design of a geothermal project in the town of Bishop Auckland further investigation of its geometry was necessary and led to the present study. We show using three-dimensional modelling of a dense local gravity survey, combined with structural inversion, that this fault has a ramp-flat-ramp geometry, ~250 m of latest Carboniferous / Early Permian downthrow having occurred on a fault surface that is not a planar updip continuation of that which had accommodated the many kilometres of Dinantian extension. The gravity survey also reveals relatively low-density sediments in the hanging-wall of the Dinantian fault, interpreted as porous alluvial fan deposits, indicating that a favourable geothermal target indeed exists in the area.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Breccia Gashes of the Durham Coast. Lebour.G.A
    Durham E-Theses Some aspects of the geomorphology of the Durham coast Westgate, W. A. How to cite: Westgate, W. A. (1957) Some aspects of the geomorphology of the Durham coast, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/8519/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published without his prior written consent and information derived from it should be acknowledged. SOME ASPECTS OF THE G-EOMQRPHOLO GY OP THE DUHHAM COAST W.A. Westgate, B.Sc. Submitted for the Degree of Ph.D. in the University of Durham. February, 1957. Itmm?, not ** > \ i3i (i) This research was carried out whilst I was in receipt of a Nature Conservancy Research Studentship "between July 1953 and July 1955.
    [Show full text]
  • County Durham Plan (Adopted 2020)
    County Durham Plan ADOPTED 2020 Contents Foreword 5 1 Introduction 7 Neighbourhood Plans 7 Assessing Impacts 8 Duty to Cooperate: Cross-Boundary Issues 9 County Durham Plan Key Diagram and Monitoring 10 2 What the County Durham Plan is Seeking to Achieve 11 3 Vision and Objectives 14 Delivering Sustainable Development 18 4 How Much Development and Where 20 Quantity of Development (How Much) 20 Spatial Distribution of Development (Where) 29 5 Core Principles 71 Building a Strong Competitive Economy 71 Ensuring the Vitality of Town Centres 78 Supporting a Prosperous Rural Economy 85 Delivering a Wide Choice of High Quality Homes 98 Protecting Green Belt Land 124 Sustainable Transport 127 Supporting High Quality Infrastructure 138 Requiring Good Design 150 Promoting Healthy Communities 158 Meeting the Challenge of Climate Change, Flooding and Coastal Change 167 Conserving and Enhancing the Natural and Historic Environment 185 Minerals and Waste 212 Appendices A Strategic Policies 259 B Table of Superseded Policies 261 C Coal Mining Risk Assessments, Minerals Assessments and Minerals and/or Waste 262 Infrastructure Assessment D Safeguarding Mineral Resources and Safeguarded Minerals and Waste Sites 270 E Glossary of Terms 279 CDP Adopted Version 2020 Contents List of County Durham Plan Policies Policy 1 Quantity of New Development 20 Policy 2 Employment Land 30 Policy 3 Aykley Heads 38 Policy 4 Housing Allocations 47 Policy 5 Durham City's Sustainable Urban Extensions 61 Policy 6 Development on Unallocated Sites 68 Policy 7 Visitor Attractions
    [Show full text]
  • Transactions of the Natural History Society of Northumberland, Durham
    — —;; 1 TRANSACTIONS OF THE NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY, #C. #C. $C. No. I.. Flora of Northumberland and Durham. By Nathaniel John Winch, PART I. PHtENOGAMOUS plants. MONANDRIA MONOGYNIA. The Privet is truly indigenous only in our Magnesian Limestone district, though straggling plants may be occasionally met with throughout the north of 1. SALICORNIA England. I. S. Iterbacca. Marsh Samphire, Jointed-glasswort Sm. Eng. Fl. i. 2 ; Hook. Fl. Scot. 1 ; Berwick 4. FRAXINUS. Flora, 2; S. annua, Eng. Bot. 415. 1. F. excelsior. Common Ash. /3 S. procumbent. Procumbent Jointed-glasswort. Sm. Eng. Fl. i. 14; Eng. Bot. 1G92; Hook. Fl. Sm. Eng. Fl. i. 2 ; Eng. Bot. 2475. Scot. 3. a On the muddy sea shores and salt marshes of Tyne, |3 F. ftelcrophylla. Simple -leaved Ash. Wear, Tees, "&c, also at Holy Island. /3 in salt marshes at Saltholme, Hartlepool, D Mr. J. Sm. Eng. Fl. 14; Eng. Bot. 2476. Backhouse. « In woods and hedges. /3 in plantations. In the north, where the true Samphire is not known, A variety of the ash with leaves mostly simple. the Glasswort is sold under that name. 5. CIRCiEA. 2. HIPPURIS. 1. C. luteiiana. Common Enchanter's-nightshade. 1. H. vulgaris. Mare's-tail. Sm. Eng. Fl. i. 15; Eng. Bot. 1056; With. ii. i. iii. Sm. Eng. Fl. 4 ; Eng. Bot. 763 ; With. ii. 6 1 ; Hook. Fl. Scot. 4 ; Curt. Lond. Fasc. Curt. Fasc. iv. t. 1 ; Gr. Fl. Eds. 1. t. 3 ; Berwick Flora, 6. At Prestwick Carr, N. In the Skern near the bridge In moist shady woods and hedges, but not very com- at Darlington, and at Hell-kettles, D.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Guide Introduction
    Heritage Coast Sunderland Durham Hartlepool Coastal wildlife guide Introduction Our coastline is a nature explorer’s dream. With dramatic views along the coastline and out across the North Sea, it has unique qualities which come from its underlying geology, its natural vegetation and the influences of the sea. It is a wonderfully varied coastline of shallow bays and headlands with yellow limestone cliffs up to 30 metres high. The coastal slopes and grasslands are home to a fabulous array of wild flowers and insects, in contrast the wooded coastal denes are a mysterious landscape of tangled trees, roe deer and woodland birds. This guide shows a small selection of some the fascinating features and wildlife you may see on your visit to our coast; from Hendon in the north to Hartlepool Headland in the south, there is always something interesting to see, whatever the time of year. Scan the code to find out more about Durham Heritage Coast. Contents 4 Birds 9 Insects 13 Marine Mammals 16 Pebbles 20 Plants 25 Sand Dunes 29 Seashore The coast is a great place to see birds. In the autumn and spring lots of different types of passage migrant birds can be seen. The UK's birds can be split in to three categories of conservation importance - red, amber and green. Red is the highest conservation priority, with species needing urgent action. Amber is the next most critical group, followed by green. The colour is shown next to the image. Please keep your dogs on a lead to avoid disturbance to ground nesting birds in the summer and also over wintering birds.
    [Show full text]
  • Nature Conservation on a Shoestring
    Bulletin of the Chartered Institute of Ecology and Environmental Management Issue 98 | December 2017 Nature Conservation on a Shoestring In this issue Conservation on a Shoestring: Working for Wildlife – Pantheon: A New Resource The Mutualistic Benefits of Environmental Partnerships for Invertebrate Survey University – Nature Reserve between Water Companies Standards and Analysis Collaborations and Wildlife Trusts Welcome Information Nature Conservation on a Shoestring In Practice No. 98 December 2017 Most CIEEM members will agree that a healthy, wildlife-rich natural world is valuable ISSN 1754-4882 in its own right as well as being the foundation of our wellbeing and prosperity; Editor we depend on it and it depends on us. Yet too many forces in the world are pulling Dr Gillian Kerby ([email protected]) wildlife and people apart, unnecessarily damaging natural systems, disrupting Internal contributions ecological processes and reducing biodiversity. The turbulence of the political climate coordinator opens up major risks but also presents new opportunities for nature conservation. Mr Jason Reeves ([email protected]) We have our work cut out to turn this chaos to the advantage of the natural world. Editorial Board Mr Jonathan Barnes, Dr Kate Bayley, The Wildlife Trusts believe that everyone deserves to live in a healthy environment, Dr Andrew Cherrill, Mr Dominic Coath, rich in wildlife and full of opportunities to enjoy the natural world. By working Mr Neil Harwood, Dr Caroline McParland, together, in the places that are closest and most important to us, people can change Mrs Kate Morris, Mr Paul Rooney, the natural world for the better – whoever and wherever we are – for ourselves and Mr Paul Scott, Miss Katrena Stanhope, Mr Darren Towers for future generations.
    [Show full text]
  • Sedgefield Local Plan Environment Chapter
    Sedgefield Borough Local Plan Page 1 ENVIRONMENT The Borough consists of distinctive landscape areas that together create its particular character and provide the setting for the built environment of the various towns and villages. Most of the towns and villages in the Borough developed rapidly in response to growth in industry and coal mining over the last 100 years and contain relics of the industrial past; some show evidence of their agricultural origins. Parts of twelve towns and villages are designated conservation areas. There are over 170 listed buildings of architectural or historic interest. The built environment provides the background to where people live, work and spend much of their leisure time and helps to create the identity of different places. The natural environment consists primarily of the countryside between and around settlements but also areas of open space within towns and villages. The countryside is mainly in agricultural use but is also a valuable resource for recreation, leisure and wildlife. The open spaces within settlements are of value for a variety of uses and provide an attractive setting to built development. Within the countryside there are areas recognised for their special quality and interest. There are four areas of historic landscape, three of which are designated as conservation areas, seven Sites of Special Scientific Interest and four scheduled ancient monuments. The landscape is varied and is divided into four characteristic areas: the Magnesian Limestone escarpment, the River Wear Valley Shelf, and River Wear Valley Area of Landscape Value, and the Southern and Eastern Lowlands. The Borough is fortunate in that there is little derelict land remaining from its industrial past.
    [Show full text]
  • County Durham Countryside Directory for People with Disabilities Open
    County Durham Countryside Directory for People with Disabilities Second edition Whatever your needs, access to and enjoyment of the countryside is rewarding, healthy and great fun. This directory can help you find out what opportunities are available to you in your area. Get yourself outdoors and enjoy all the benefits that come with it… Foreword written by Tony Blair Open This directory was designed for people with a disability, though the information included will be useful to everyone. The Land of the Prince Bishops has some of the most stunning landscapes in Britain. From its high Pennine moorland in the west to the limestone cliffs of its North Sea coastline in the east, County Durham boasts an impressive variety of landscape for you to explore. Upper Teesdale, in the North Pennines Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, is home to England's highest waterfall, High Force. At Barnard Castle, on the banks of the Tees, you can explore the romantic ruins which gave the town its name, as well as the sumptuous Bowes Museum and the medieval Raby Castle with its majestic deer park. For people interested in wildlife and conservation there is much that can be done from home or a local accessible area. Whatever your chosen form of countryside recreation, whether it’s joining a group, doing voluntary work, or getting yourself out into the countryside on your own, we hope you will get as much out of it as we do. There is still some way to go before we have a properly accessible countryside. By contacting Open Country or another of the organisations listed here, you can help to encourage better access for all in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham Rare Plant Register 2016
    County Durham Rare Plant Register 2016 JOHN L. DURKIN MSc. MCIEEM BSBI Recorder for County Durham 25 May Avenue. Winlaton Mill, Blaydon, NE21 6SF [email protected] www.durhamnature.co.uk Contents Introduction to the rare plants register Notes on plant distribution and protection The individual species accounts in alphabetical order Site Index First published 2010. This is the 2016, fourth edition of the “RPR”, dedicated to Keith Cunningham, who helped so much with the early databases and in many other ways. Improvements in this edition include- The new English Red List is incorporated into this edition. An additional 10% records, most of these more recent and more precise. Cover picture—Bird’s Eye Primrose at Widdybank Fell. Introduction Most counties are in the process of compiling a County Rare Plant Register, to assist in the study and conservation of their rare species. The process is made easier if the county has a published Flora and a strong Biological Records Centre, and Durham is fortunate to have Gordon Graham's Flora and the Durham Wildlife Trust’s “Recorder" system. We have also had a Biodiversity project, based at Rainton Meadows, which until 2013 carried out conservation projects to protect the rare species. It is hoped that the “RPR” will act as a stimulus for local botanists to make special efforts to improve the database by recording these species. The register will be used to increase our understanding of the status and distribution of the rare species, and to aid and promote their conservation. Species Covered Three groups of vascular plant species are included.
    [Show full text]