Slaughter of Cattle

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Slaughter of Cattle This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from Explore Bristol Research, http://research-information.bristol.ac.uk Author: Fuseini, Awal Title: The development and practical implementation of Single Pulse Ultra-High Current for humane and Halal compliant slaughter of cattle General rights Access to the thesis is subject to the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International Public License. A copy of this may be found at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode This license sets out your rights and the restrictions that apply to your access to the thesis so it is important you read this before proceeding. Take down policy Some pages of this thesis may have been removed for copyright restrictions prior to having it been deposited in Explore Bristol Research. However, if you have discovered material within the thesis that you consider to be unlawful e.g. breaches of copyright (either yours or that of a third party) or any other law, including but not limited to those relating to patent, trademark, confidentiality, data protection, obscenity, defamation, libel, then please contact [email protected] and include the following information in your message: •Your contact details •Bibliographic details for the item, including a URL •An outline nature of the complaint Your claim will be investigated and, where appropriate, the item in question will be removed from public view as soon as possible. The development and practical implementation of Single Pulse Ultra-High Current (SPUC) stunning for a humane and Halal compliant system of stunning cattle. A dissertation submitted to the University of Bristol in accordance with the requirements for award of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) in the Faculty of Health Sciences of the School of Veterinary Sciences. by Awal Fuseini Word Count 65,314 i Abstract This thesis reports the development of a new system of head-only electrical stunning system, Single Pulse Ultra-High Current (SPUC) for the humane slaughter of cattle. Optimum electrical parameters for the development and construction of the SPUC Stunner were identified through a number of in vitro experiments. First, the electric fields in the head and brain were measured by applying voltage from a 250 V, 50 Hz power source with an isolated (from earth) output through two large needle electrodes, via the nose and neck. The electric field in the head was found to be 3.3 Vcm -1 and 1.3 Vcm -1 in the brain. Secondly, neural membranes were electroporated using a Gene Pulser Xcell electroporation system (Bio-Rad, USA) to determine the effect of energy on the electroporation of brain cells. The results showed that energy was the main factor influencing electroporation of neural membranes. To date a prototype SPUC stunner has been produced. Using dummy loads, the stunner has been demonstrated to produce the target range of voltage and current. It is undergoing further design and development to better avoid arcing and to provide additional protection for the high voltage switch. The work for this PhD also included an investigation into the knowledge, views and acceptability of stunning at the time of Halal slaughter across a range of stakeholders as an important precursor for the design and introduction of the SPUC device into full commercial use. A survey of 314 Halal consumers and 66 Islamic scholars in the UK showed that 95% of Islamic scholars and 53% of Halal consumers would accept meat from stunned animals if the method of stunning did not cause the death of animals prior to exsanguination. In a separate study to evaluate veterinary students’ perception about Halal slaughter, the majority (95.2%) of the 459 respondents indicated that they would want all animals to be stunned prior to slaughter, including Halal slaughter. ii dedicated to Hamna, Saha, Suglo, Simli and Hajia Fatima iii Acknowledgements I will like to extend my heartfelt gratitude to my supervisor, Professor Toby Knowles for his support and guidance from the conception of this project through to its completion. Special mention also goes to Mr. Steve Wotton who was one of my supervisors until his retirement in 2017, I wish Steve a happy retirement. My thanks also go to Dr. Jefferey Lines of Silsoe Livestock Systems, Jeff was instrumental during the development of the electronics for the SPUC stunner and played a significant role in the design of the in vitro experiments involving cattle heads and brain cells. I also thank Dr. Jo Murrell and Mr. Andy Grist, who both briefly supervised my work after Steve’s retirement. I will also like to thank Mr. Steve Brown and Mr. Stefaan Lescouhier for their assistance during the field experiments. Special thanks also go to Dr. Tristan Cogan for granting me permission to use his laboratory and for his guidance in conducting the in vitro experiment on ion migration from neural membranes (described in chapter 4). I am also grateful to the Imaging and Cytometry Laboratory of the University of York for granting me permission to conduct one of the electroporation experiments in their laboratory (described chapter 5). Funding for the project was generously provided by the Humane Slaughter Association (HSA), the UK’s Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board (AHDB) and Euro Meat Group in Belgium, I am grateful for their support. Finally, I am indebted to my mother, Hajia Fatima who single-handedly funded my education up to my bachelor’s degree. To my late father, your efforts have not been in vain, rest in perfect peace dad. iv Author’s declaration I declare that the work in this dissertation was carried out in accordance with the requirements of the University's Regulations and Code of Practice for Research Degree Programmes and that it has not been submitted for any other academic award. Except where indicated by specific reference in the text, the work is my own work. Work done in collaboration with, or with the assistance of, others, is indicated as such. Any views expressed in the dissertation are my own views and not the views of the University of Bristol. Awal Fuseini DATE: June 2019 v Authored papers As part of this PhD project, I have published eleven peer-reviewed papers in various scientific journals. However only three of the papers have been fully included as chapters in this thesis to fit into a narrative. In the three papers included as chapters, I can confirm that I was the lead author and wrote the manuscripts as well as analysed the data (where applicable). The following are the published papers included as chapters in the thesis. Appendix A contains copies of all published papers that are not included as full chapters in the thesis. 1. Chapter 1 (from section 1.8): The brain, unconsciousness and death: a critical appraisal with regard to Halal meat production. Note: I was the sole author of this paper which was published in 2019 in Animal Welfare Journal (Animal Welfare, 28, 165-171). I conceived the idea, gathered the relevant scientific information, wrote the paper and submitted it to the journal for review. 2. Chapter 2: The perception and acceptability of pre-slaughter and post-slaughter stunning for Halal production: The views of UK Islamic scholars and Halal consumers. Note: I was the lead author of this paper which was published in 2017 in Meat Science Journal (Meat Science, 123, 143-150). I conceived the idea, collected the data, analysed the data, wrote the paper and submitted it to the journal for review. There were three other authors of the paper, two of whom were my supervisors who provided guidance on data analysis and reviewed the draft publication. 3. Chapter 3: Veterinary students’ perception and understanding of issues surrounding the slaughter of animals according to the rules of Halal: a survey of students from four English universities. vi Note: I was the lead author of this paper which was published in the Journal of Animals (Animals, 9, 293). I conceived the idea, collected the data, analysed the data, wrote the paper and submitted it to the journal for review. There were two co-authors of this paper, both of whom were my supervisors. They both provided guidance on data collection, analysis and reviewed the manuscript before it was submitted to the journal for review. The remainder of the papers are listed below. I am the primary author on all of these papers, the main body of text within all these papers was primarily written by myself: 1. Fuseini, A., Knowles, T.G., Lines, J.A., Hadley, P.J., and Wotton, S.B. (2016). The stunning and slaughter of cattle within the EU: a review of the current situation with regard to the halal market. Animal Welfare, 25, 365-376. Please note that this paper is a summary of the introductory chapter of this thesis (chapter 1). At the start of the PhD project, a 25,000 worded literature review was conducted, this was subsequently summarised and published in Animal Welfare Journal. 2. Fuseini, A., Knowles, T.G., Hadley, P.J., Wotton, S.B. (2016). Halal stunning and slaughter: Criteria for the assessment of dead animals. Meat Science, 119, 132-137. 3. Fuseini, A., Wotton, S.B., Hadley, P.J., and Knowles, T.G. (2017). The compatibility of modern slaughter techniques with halal slaughter: a review of the aspects of ‘modern’ slaughter methods that divide scholarly opinion within the Muslim community. Animal Welfare, 26, 301-310. 4. Fuseini, A., Knowles, T.G., Hadley, P.J., Wotton, S.B. (2017). Food and companion animal welfare: the Islamic perspective. CAB Review, 12, 1-6. vii 5. Fuseini, A., Wotton, S.B., Knowles, T.G., and Hadley, P.J.
Recommended publications
  • Effectiveness of a Non-Penetrating Captive Bolt for Euthanasia of Suckling and Weaned Piglets
    Effectiveness of a Non-penetrating Captive Bolt for Euthanasia of Suckling and Weaned Piglets by Teresa Casey-Trott A Thesis Presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Animal and Poultry Science Guelph, Ontario, Canada © Teresa Marie Casey-Trott, August, 2012 ABSTRACT EFFECTIVENESS OF A NON-PENETRATING CAPTIVE BOLT FOR EUTHANASIA OF SUCKLING AND WEANED PIGLETS Teresa Marie Casey-Trott Advisor: University of Guelph, 2012 Professor Tina M. Widowski There has been minimal research into the most humane, practical method for on-farm euthanasia of suckling and weaned piglets. The goal of the research presented in this thesis was to test the effectiveness of a non-penetrating captive bolt (Zephyr-E) for euthanasia of piglets ≤ 9 kg. Brainstem and spinal reflexes and heartbeat were used to determine the time to insensibility and death. Post-mortem damage was scored to assess the degree of traumatic brain injury (TBI) induced by the Zephyr-E. The Zephyr-E consistently resulted in immediate, sustained insensibility until death in piglets ≤ 9 kg. Skull fractures and subdural and parenchymal hemorrhage were present in all piglets. Neonatal piglets had longer durations of convulsions and heartbeat and more severe damage than weaned piglets, suggesting age and weight effect TBI. Overall, the Zephyr-E was a highly effective, single step method of euthanasia for suckling and weaned piglets up to 9 kg. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, I would like to thank my advisor, Dr. Tina Widowski, for her support, patience, and guidance as I learned what it takes to earn a Masters degree.
    [Show full text]
  • Preventive Measure Against Possible BSE-Hazard: Irreversible Electrical Cattle Stunning - a Review
    VETERINARSKI ARHIV 75 (1), 83-100, 2005 Preventive measure against possible BSE-hazard: Irreversible electrical cattle stunning - a review Spyridon Basilios Ramantanis1*, Mirza Hadžiosmanović2, and Đurđica Stubičan3 1Department of Food Technology, Technological Educational Institution (T.E.I.) of Athens, Greece 2Department of Hygiene and Technology of Foodstuffs of Animal Origin, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zagreb, Croatia 3Library, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zagreb, Croatia RAMANTANIS, S. B., M. HADŽIOSMANOVIĆ, Đ. STUBIČAN: Preventive measure against possible BSE-hazard: Irreversible electrical cattle stunning - a review. Vet. arhiv 75, 83-100, 2005. ABSTRACT During stunning the entrance of the bolt into the cranial cavity results in massive brain tissue damage. There is a risk of brain tissue particles being transferred via the blood flow in the minor blood circulation system. This can lead to contamination of blood, lungs and heart with the BSE agent. Tissues of CNS carry almost all of the infectivity in cattle sub-clinically and clinically affected by BSE. The approved rapid post-mortem tests cannot identify BSE-infected animals early in the incubation period. Thus it is not inconceivable that an animal with a negative rapid test result could, if stunned by a method that produced emboli, still have BSE-infected emboli dispersed through the venous blood stream, the lungs and the heart. Two systems for electrical stunning of cattle are presented. The replacement of the penetrative stunning method
    [Show full text]
  • Lumane SLAUGHTER
    lUMANE SLAUGHTER HEARINGS BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON LIVESTOCK AND FEED GEAINS OF THE COMMITTEE ON AGßlCULTÜEE HOUSE OF EEPEESENTATIYES EIGHTY-FIFTH CONGEESS FIRST SESSION ON H. R. 176, H. R. 2880, H. R. 3029, H. R. 3049, H. R. 5671, H. R. 5820, H. R. 6422, AND H. R. 650J APRIL 2 AND 12, 1957 Printed for the use of the Committee on Agriculture Serial L UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1957 ROSS BASS, Tennessee DONALD E. TE WES, Wisconsin COYA KNUTSON, Minnesota DELEGATES W. PAT JENNINGS, Virginia E. L. BARTLETT, Alaska D. R. (BILLY) MATTHEWS, Florida JOHN A. BURNS, Hawaii RESIDENT COMMISSIONER II A. FERNÓS-ISERN, Puerto Rico Mrs. MABEL C. DOWNEY, Clerh JOHN J. HEIMBURGER, Coufisel FRANCIS M. LE MAY, Consultant SUBCOMMITTEE ON LIVESTOCK AND FEED GRAINS W. R. POAGE, Texas, Chairman CARL ALBERT, Oklahoma WILLIAM S. HILL, Colorado W. PAT JENNINGS, Virginia CHARLES B. HOEVEN, Iowa D. R. (BILLY) MATTHEWS, Florida RALPH HARVEY, Indiana JOHN A. BURNS, Hawaii II W. R. POluifl, TexasT""^^^^^^**" "JlUiUUl 11. iiI|iI'liiJiJilHi||iiillli I GEORGE M. GRANT, Alabama WILLIAM S. HILL, Colorado E. C. GATHINGS, Arkansas CHARLES B. HOEVEN, Iowa JOHN L. MCMILLAN, South Carolina SID SIMPSON, Illinois THOMAS G. ABERNETHY, Mississippi PAUL B. DAGUE, Pennsylvania CARL ALBERT, Oklahoma RALPH HARVEY, Indiana WATKINS M. ABBITT, Virginia PAGE BELCHER, Oklahoma JAMES G. POLK, Ohio CLIFFORD G. McINTIRE, Maine CLARK W. THOMPSON, Texas WILLIAM R. WILLIAMS, New York PAUL C. JONES, Missouri ROBERT D. HARRISON, Nebraska JOHN C. WATTS, Kentucky HENRY ALDOUS DIXON, Utah HARLAN HAGEN, California WINT SMITH, Kansas LESTER R.
    [Show full text]
  • Anglo-American Blood Sports, 1776-1889: a Study of Changing Morals
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 1974 Anglo-American blood sports, 1776-1889: a study of changing morals. Jack William Berryman University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses Berryman, Jack William, "Anglo-American blood sports, 1776-1889: a study of changing morals." (1974). Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014. 1326. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses/1326 This thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ANGLO-AMERICAN BLOOD SPORTS, I776-I8891 A STUDY OF CHANGING MORALS A Thesis Presented By Jack William Berryman Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS April, 197^ Department of History » ii ANGLO-AMERICAN BLOOD SPORTS, 1776-1889 A STUDY OF CHANGING MORALS A Thesis By Jack V/illiam Berryman Approved as to style and content by« Professor Robert McNeal (Head of Department) Professor Leonard Richards (Member) ^ Professor Paul Boyer (I'/iember) Professor Mario DePillis (Chairman) April, 197^ ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Upon concluding the following thesis, the many im- portant contributions of individuals other than myself loomed large in my mind. Without the assistance of others the project would never have been completed, I am greatly indebted to Professor Guy Lewis of the Department of Physical Education at the University of Massachusetts who first aroused my interest in studying sport history and continued to motivate me to seek the an- swers why.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommendations
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH & CONSUMER PROTECTION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL Scientific Steering Committee OPINION ON THE SAFETY OF RUMINANT BLOOD WITH RESPECT TO TSE RISKS ADOPTED BY THE SCIENTIFIC STEERING COMMITTEE AT ITS MEETING OF 13-14 APRIL 2000 OPINION Animal (incl. ruminant) blood is currently legally fed to animals (including ruminants) after very gentle processes, spread on pasture as fertiliser, or used for other products that may reach man or animals (incl. ruminants). There is some concern that animal TSEs might be spread by these means or through specific blood components or blood based products that are still permitted to enter the market. It is therefore necessary to establish if animal TSEs can be transferred via blood and the SSC was requested to: A. Assess for ruminant blood in general and if possible for each component the risk that it could harbour the BSE (TSE) agent and hence transfer the disease. B. Identify the main ruminant blood-based products that are currently on the market, including products containing ruminant blood or those in which ruminant blood is used in their manufacture. C. Assess for each product, the function of the blood component included and the risk that that product could transfer BSE (TSE) to ruminants. D. Outline possible measures that could mitigate any identified risk, as far as possible together with a (qualitative) assessment of the potential impact of the measure on the risk. In order to answer these questions, a Working Group was created which delivered a detailed report upon which this opinion is based (see attachment). On the basis of this report, the SSC elaborated the following summary account, conclusions and recommendations.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of the Use of the "CASH" Dispatch Kit Captive Bolt Gun As a Single Stage Euthanasia Process for Pigs Jennifer Woods Iowa State University
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Digital Repository @ Iowa State University Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Graduate Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2012 Analysis of the use of the "CASH" Dispatch Kit captive bolt gun as a single stage euthanasia process for pigs Jennifer Woods Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd Part of the Agriculture Commons, Animal Sciences Commons, and the Veterinary Medicine Commons Recommended Citation Woods, Jennifer, "Analysis of the use of the "CASH" Dispatch Kit captive bolt gun as a single stage euthanasia process for pigs" (2012). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 12706. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/12706 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Analysis of the use of the “CASH” Dispatch Kit captive bolt gun as a single stage euthanasia process for pigs by Jennifer Anne Woods A thesis submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Major: Veterinary Preventative Medicine Program of Study Committee: Suzanne Millman, Major Professor Anna Butters-Johnson Annette O’Connor Iowa State University
    [Show full text]
  • News Bulletin
    Issue 15, March 2012 News Bulletin http://www.aasg.org.au CONTENTS NATIONAL NEWS ........................................................................................................................................ 3 REGIONAL NEWS ....................................................................................................................................... 5 PUBLICATIONS ......................................................................................................................................... 11 SPECIAL REPORT: THE SPIDER IN MY OLIVE TREE ........................................................................... 12 CONFERENCES & SYMPOSIUMS ........................................................................................................... 14 INTERVIEW: RUTH HATTEN..................................................................................................................... 23 GROUPS, INSTITUTES AND NETWORKS ............................................................................................... 24 NEW BOOKS .............................................................................................................................................. 28 JOURNALS................................................................................................................................................. 38 EXHIBITIONS ............................................................................................................................................. 42 ARTWORK.................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Stunning and Slaughter of Cattle Within the EU: a Review of the Current Situation with Regard to the Halal Market
    Fuseini, A. , Knowles, T. G., Lines, J., Hadley, P. J., & Wotton, S. B. (2016). The stunning and slaughter of cattle within the EU: A review of the current situation with regard to the halal market. Animal Welfare, 25(3), 365-376. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.25.3.365 Peer reviewed version License (if available): CC BY-NC-ND Link to published version (if available): 10.7120/09627286.25.3.365 Link to publication record in Explore Bristol Research PDF-document This is the author accepted manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via UFAW at http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/ufaw/aw/2016/00000025/00000003/art00009?token=004f19127ad2db66 27e41225f4038382c496766763f25255050576b34272c5f7b3d6d3f4e4b3444. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher. University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research General rights This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the reference above. Full terms of use are available: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/red/research-policy/pure/user-guides/ebr-terms/ 1 The Stunning and Slaughter of Cattle within the EU: A review of the current 2 situation with regard to the Halal market. a a b c a 3 A Fuseini , TG Knowles , JA Lines , PJ Hadley , SB Wotton a 4 University of Bristol, School of Veterinary Science, Langford, Bristol. BS40 5 5DU. UK b 6 Silsoe Livestock Systems Ltd, Wrest Park, Silsoe, Bedfordshire, MK45 4HR. 7 UK c 8 AHDB Beef and Lamb, The Baron Suite, Creech Castle,Bathpool, Taunton TA1 9 2DX. UK 10 Correspondence: [email protected] 11 Running Title: Halal stunning and slaughter of cattle 12 Abstract 13 The slaughter of animals for the Halal market is both ethically and economically 14 significant.
    [Show full text]
  • Stunning Methods and TSE Risks in Ruminants
    SSC meeting of 6-7 September2001 / 6.2.a EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH & CONSUMER PROTECTION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL Directorate C - Scientific Opinions C1 - Follow-up and dissemination of scientific opinions PRELIMINARY SCIENTIFIC OPINION AND REPORT ON STUNNING METHODS AND BSE RISKS (THE RISK OF DISSEMINATION OF BRAIN PARTICLES INTO THE BLOOD AND CARCASS WHEN APPLYING CERTAIN STUNNING METHODS.) ADOPTED BY THE SCIENTIFIC STEERING COMMITTEE AT ITS MEETING OF 6-7 SEPTEMBER 2001 NOTE: The opinion and report have been adopted by the SSC on **** as preliminary documents. They are based on data published in scientific journals or available from ongoing research projects. Other relevant information on (potential risks from) stunning methods and equipment may, however, be available from other sources that do not commonly report in scientific or technical press. Scientists, industrial associations, research institutes, veterinary pathology laboratories, etc. are therefore invited to comment on the attached documents and, if appropriate, provide additional information. These contributions should be sent before 26 October 2001 to the secretariat of the SSC. The SSC will if appropriate integrate them in its final opinion. The industry is invited to, as far as possible, co-ordinate its comments and channel them trough existing associations. Individual comments are, however, also welcome. Address for sending comments: [email protected] C:\TEMP\Lungs_hart_0109_PREOPINION.doc PRELIMINARY OPINION ON STUNNING METHODS AND BSE RISKS (THE RISK OF DISSEMINATION
    [Show full text]
  • Facts on Stunning‏
    FACTS ON STUNNING‏ International Halal and Tayyib products workshops 24-25 October 2015 Istanbul - Turkey HISTORY OF STUNNING • A primitive form of stunning was used in premodern times in the case of cattle, which were poleaxed (An axe having a hammer face opposite the blade, used to slaughter cattle). • prior to humane slaughter pistols and electric stunners, pigs, sheep and other animals (including cattle) were simply struck while fully conscious • The development of stunning technologies occurred largely in the first half of the twentieth century. In 1911, the Council of Justice to Animals (later the Humane Slaughter Association) was created to improve the slaughter of livestock and address the killing of unwanted pets. • In the early 1920s, HSA introduced and demonstrated a mechanical stunner, which led to the adoption of humane stunning by many local authorities.“ • The HSA played a key role in the passage of the Slaughter of Animals Act 1933. This made the mechanical stunning of cows and electrical stunning of pigs compulsory, with the exception of Jewish and Muslim meat. Ref: Wikipedia WHY IS STUNNING USED • To kill more animals for profit • To deem the animal unconscious to avoid any pain when the cut is done, so they say (?) 1. Captive bolt gun: retractable rod causes concussion or brain damage 2. Electrocution: poultry dipped in electrified pool of water or current applied to animals head 3. Gassing: suffocation with carbon dioxide THE MYTH OF PAIN AND CRUELTY IN RELIGIOUS SLAUGHTER (WITHOUT STUNNING) • No scientific medical
    [Show full text]
  • Reducing the Risk of Kick Injury During the Shackling and Sticking of Cattle in Abattoirs
    Health and Safety Executive Reducing the risk of kick injury during the shackling and sticking of cattle in abattoirs Prepared by the Health and Safety Laboratory for the Health and Safety Executive 2014 RR1014 Research Report Health and Safety Executive Reducing the risk of kick injury during the shackling and sticking of cattle in abattoirs Tony Wynn Health and Safety Laboratory Harpur Hill Buxton Derbyshire SK17 9JN The slaughter operations in abattoirs vary considerably due to different technical design, different stun systems and different killing rates. The shackling and sticking tasks place the operative at a high risk of being kicked during the slaughter task, as the operative is required to work predominantly within the kick envelope, ie within the functional reach of the animal’s limbs. It is impossible to stop animals from kicking during slaughter with a stun/kill protocol based on captive bolt stunning. Furthermore, it is difficult to predict which animal will have post stun convulsions and how strong those convulsions will be. This uncertainty makes it difficult to directly control the risk of kicking during the shackling and sticking tasks. The purpose of this report is to investigate the shackling and sticking tasks, in order to find ways to eliminate or reduce the risk to the operator by redesigning the work task. Beyond this it is a matter of demonstrating that all that is reasonably practicable has been done to protect the welfare of staff performing the stunning, shackling and sticking tasks and making continual incremental improvements in the process, with the aim of reducing the level of risk to the operator.
    [Show full text]
  • Methods of Animal Slaughter Humane Slaughter
    Unit 1 VETERINARY PUBLIC HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY (Credit Hours 3+1=4) 1 Humane Slaughter According to the law, animals should be stunned for unconsciousness prior to their slaughter to ensure a quick, relatively painless death Humane Slaughter Modern abattoir 1. Stunning – Mechanical Electrical Chemical 2. Bleeding / Sticking Stunning ▪ Act of making animal insensible or unconscious to pain while killing slaughtering or sticking ▪ Promotes animal welfare & meat quality Stunning has two purpose: 1. To induce an immediate state of insensibility 2. To produce sufficient immobility to facilitate the sticking process to initiate bleeding Common methods of stunning 1. Mechanical methods Penetrative Percussion Non penetrative/concussion 2. Chemical/gaseous method 3. Electrical method Choice of methods of stunning ➢ Class of animals ➢ Intended line speed ➢ Humane aspects ➢ Capital and maintenance ➢ Ease of operation ➢ Safety of personnel ➢ Effects on carcass and brain ➢ Religious and legal requirements Percussive stunning • 2 types – Penetrative ( CBP, pneumatic & water jet stunning) – Non penetrative ( mushroom head stunner) • Captive bolt pistol- 2 types ❖ Help of trigger ❖ Contact type Principle ❖ Propels bolt forward by discharge of blank cartridge ❖ Automatically recoils back into the barrel Strength of cartridge • Different strength for different species • Measured in grains (1 grain = 0.065 g ) • Large cattle & mature bulls → 3-4 grains lambs → 1 grain • Mostly 0.22 or 0.25 grain cartridge is used • Used for stunning in cattle, sheep & calves Less effective in bulls and pigs → massive skull & thick frontal bone Mechanism of action • Immediate & permanent insensibility by destruction of cortex & deeper parts of brain • Rapid rise & fall in intracranial pressure • Sudden jerk due to energy bolt imparts to head acceleration concussion • Results in depolarization of neurons in brain including that of cortex • Imp.
    [Show full text]