Conformational Trapping of Mismatch Recognition Complex MSH2/MSH3
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Conformational trapping of Mismatch Recognition PNAS PLUS Complex MSH2/MSH3 on repair-resistant DNA loops Walter H. Langa,1,2, Julie E. Coatsb,1, Jerzy Majkaa, Greg L. Huraa, Yuyen Linb, Ivan Rasnikb,3, and Cynthia T. McMurraya,c,d,3 aLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Life Sciences Division, 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720; cDepartment of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics; dDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Foundation, 200 First Street, Rochester, MN 55905; and bDepartment of Physics, Emory University, 400 Dowman Drive, MSC N214, Atlanta, GA 30322 Edited* by Peter H. von Hippel, Institute of Molecular Biology, Eugene, OR, and approved August 3, 2011 (received for review April 6, 2011) Insertion and deletion of small heteroduplex loops are common which fails to effectively couple DNA binding with downstream mutations in DNA, but why some loops are prone to mutation and repair signaling. We envision that conformational regulation of others are efficiently repaired is unknown. Here we report that the small loop repair occurs at the level of the junction dynamics. mismatch recognition complex, MSH2/MSH3, discriminates between a repair-competent and a repair-resistant loop by sensing the con- Results formational dynamics of their junctions. MSH2/MSH3 binds, bends, Conformational Integrity of MSH2/MSH3 and the DNA “Junction” Tem- and dissociates from repair-competent loops to signal downstream plates. We characterized the DNA-binding affinity and nucleotide repair. Repair-resistant Cytosine-Adenine-Guanine (CAG) loops adopt binding properties of MSH2/MSH3 bound to looped templates, a unique DNA junction that traps nucleotide-bound MSH2/MSH3, either a ðCAÞ4 loop or CAG hairpin loops of either 7 or 13 and inhibits its dissociation from the DNA. We envision that junction (ðCAGÞ7 and ðCAGÞ13) triplet repeats (Fig. 1A). Both loop and dynamics is an active participant and a conformational regulator hairpin templates were constructed from two single-stranded oli- of repair signaling, and governs whether a loop is removed by gonucleotides (Fig. 1A). Neither the ðCAÞ4 loop nor the CAG MSH2/MSH3 or escapes to become a precursor for mutation. stem had complementary sequences within the duplex portion of the template. Thus, the junction templates folded into stable DNA repair ∣ mismatch repair ∣ smFRET ∣ trinucelotide expansion extrahelical loops, which have been previously characterized in solution (26, 31). Folding of the CAG loops creates A/A mis- BIOCHEMISTRY nsertion or deletion of small extrahelical loops is one of the matches every third base pair in the stem, for a total of three ð Þ Imost common mutations in human cancers (1–3), but the me- mismatches in the CAG 7 template or a total of six mismatches chanism by which they occur is unknown. Small loops, bulges, in the ðCAGÞ13 template. DNA templates were analyzed by gel or kinked DNA occur frequently in DNA, and provide signals electrophoresis to (i) ensure the absence of any traces of single- for p53 recognition (4–7), recombination (8, 9), and/or most often stranded DNA and (ii) that the DNA loops were intact, as judged removal by the mismatch repair system (10–14). Two hetero- by an increase in the loop size and gel mobility (Fig. 1B). Unless dimeric mismatch recognition complexes, MSH2/MSH6 and specifically noted, all DNA templates were synthesized contain- MSH2/MSH3, operate in mammals with distinct, but overlapping ing a duplex base of 18 bases (Fig. 1A). specificities (12–14). The crystal structure (15–18), Atomic Force The purified human MSH2/MSH3 protein (hereafter referred Microscopy (AFM) (19), and single molecule fluorescence reso- to as MSH2/MSH3) was also of high quality (Fig. 1C). The full- nant energy transfer (smFRET) (19, 20) confirm that MSH2/ length MSH2/MSH3 was expressed and copurified as a hetero- MSH6 and Escherichia coli (MutS) preferentially bind single base dimer, and each subunit, when resolved by PAGE, migrated as a mismatches or two base pair bulges. MSH2/MSH3 can recognize single band according to the expected molecular mass (Fig. 1C). some base-base mismatches (21), but has a higher apparent affi- To further test the conformational integrity of the protein, we nity and specificity for small DNA loops composed of 2–13 bases visualized full-length MSH2/MSH3 using small angle X-ray scat- (12–14, 22–24). Thus, defects in repair mediated by MSH2/MSH3 tering (SAXS) (34, 35)(Fig. 1D). Interestingly, the high-resolu- are poised to be a major source of insertion-deletion mutations. tion SAXS structure revealed that the N-terminal portion of the The mechanism by which MSH2/MSH3 discriminates between MSH3 subunit formed an unfolded “panhandle” structure, which repair-competent and repair-resistant loops (24–26), however extended beyond the heterodimeric interface of MSH2/MSH3. remains enigmatic. A small ðCAÞ4 loop of DNA can be faithfully The handle undergoes a visible broadening and conformational repaired by MSH2/MSH3 both in vitro (24, 26) and in vivo (25, change upon binding the ðCAÞ4 loop. But otherwise, the DNA- 27, 28). In contrast, hydrogen bonded CAG hairpin loops are not bound heterodimeric portion of human MSH2/MSH3 was similar excised, and confer genomic instability through insertion and in conformation to that of the human MSH2/MSH6 bound to amplification of CAG repetitive tracts (29–31). Although ðCAÞ4 template containing a G-T mispaired base (16). Using these well loops and CAG hairpins both harbor three-way junctions, MSH2/ MSH3 interacts with them distinctly (24, 26). Why one template Author contributions: W.H.L., J.M., I.R., and C.T.M. designed research; W.H.L., J.E.C., J.M., is repaired better than the other is not known, but the conse- G.L.H., and Y.L. performed research; W.H.L., J.E.C., J.M., G.L.H., I.R., and C.T.M. analyzed quence is remarkable: Inefficient repair of CAG loops results in data; and W.H.L., J.M., I.R., and C.T.M. wrote the paper. mutations that underlie more than 20 hereditary neurodegenera- The authors declare no conflict of interest. tive or neuromuscular diseases (30–33). *This Direct Submission article had a prearranged editor. Here, we address the underlying basis for discriminating repair- Freely available online through the PNAS open access option. competent and repair-resistant DNA loops by MSH2/MSH3. We 1W.H.L. and J.E.C. contributed equally to this work. find that MSH2/MSH3 binds with similar affinity to a repair- 2 ’ ð Þ Present address: Department of Surgery, St. Jude Children s Research Hospital, 262 Danny competent CA 4 loop and to repair-resistant CAG hairpins. How- Thomas Place, MS 332, Memphis, TN 38105. ever, the three-way hairpin junction adopts a conformational state 3To whom correspondence may be addressed. E-mail: [email protected] or irasnik@ that traps nucleotide-bound MSH2/MSH3, and inhibits its disso- physics.emory.edu. ciation from the hairpin. The biochemical and smFRET results See Author Summary on page 17247. imply that repair-resistant CAG hairpins provide a unique but This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/ nonproductive binding site for nucleotide-bound MSH2/MSH3, doi:10.1073/pnas.1105461108/-/DCSupplemental. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1105461108 PNAS ∣ October 18, 2011 ∣ vol. 108 ∣ no. 42 ∣ E837–E844 Downloaded by guest on September 30, 2021 nucleotide, the apparent affinity of MSH2/MSH3 for both the ðCAÞ4 loop and hairpin templates was in the low nanomolar range (Table 2), and was in good agreement with previous mea- surements (24, 26, 31). The presence of magnesium decreased the affinity of ATP-bound MSH2/MSH3 to any template by about 10-fold, but, in general, DNA binding of ADP- or ATP-bound MSH2/MSH3 did not distinguish repair-competent ðCAÞ4 loop from the repair-resistant ðCAGÞ7 hairpin or ðCAGÞ13 hairpin. MSH2/MSH3 Stabilizes a High FRET State When Bound to the Repair- ð Þ ð Þ Competent CA 4 Loop. The CA 4 loop differs structurally from the ðCAGÞ13 DNA in that the latter forms a hairpin comprising G-C hydrogen bonded base pairs and A/A mispaired bases every third nucleotide in the stem (24, 26). To test for conformation differences between the two templates, we measured the protein- induced DNA conformational dynamics using smFRET. We pre- pared DNA substrates, which were identical to those used in the Fig. 1. Conformational Integrity of Mismatch Recognition Complexes and biochemical DNA-binding experiments, except that the bottom DNA templates. (A) Schematic structure of the three-way junction DNA tem- strand of 18 nucleotides was labeled with Cy3 (on the 5′ end, ð Þ plates. The CA 4 loop and CAG hairpins are centrally located in the upper green ball) and Cy5 (on the 3′ end, red ball) (Fig. 2 A, C, E). Thus, unlabeled strand. The duplex base comprising eighteen base pairs, which for each template used in the smFRET experiments, the local ′ ′ were labeled at the 5 end with Cy3 and at the 5 end with Cy5 for smFRET environment of the fluorophores was identical. For both tem- experiments, or with a 5′ fluorescein for the FA experiments. (B) The purified ′ templates resolved on native polyacrylamide gels and visualized by ethidium plates, the top strand at the 3 end contains a poly-dT extension bromide staining. SS is the 18nuc single strand DNA that is the complemen- and a biotin tag for immobilization on streptavidin coated cover tary strand for the looped templates, DS is the 18 bp homoduplex DNA, and slips for observation (Fig. 2 A, C, E, blue ball). The extension the heteroduplex looped substrates are as labeled. (C) Resolution of purified was designed to prevent potential interaction of the fluorophores human MSH2/MSH3 (middle lane) and MSH2/MSH6 (right lane) proteins by with the streptavidin surface.