DOCSLIB.ORG

Wolf and Coyote Trapping, by A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Wolf and Coyote Trapping, by A Wolf and Coyote Trapping, by A. R. (Arthur Robert) Harding Produced by Linda M. Everhart, Blairstown, Missouri Wolf and Coyote Trapping An Up-to-Date Wolf Hunter's Guide, Giving the Most Successful Methods of Experienced "Wolfers" for Hunting and Trapping These Animals, Also Gives Their Habits in Detail. BY A. R. HARDING Published by A. R. HARDING PUB. CO. COLUMBUS, OHIO Copyright 1909 By A. R. HARDING PUB. CO. TABLE OF CONTENTS. I. The Timber Wolf II. The Coyote III. Killing of Stock and Game by Wolves IV. Bounties V. Hunting Young Wolves and Coyotes VI. Hunting Wolves with Dogs VII. Still Hunting Wolves and Coyotes VIII. Poisoning Wolves IX. Trapping Wolves X. Scents and Baits XI. Scent Methods XII. Bait Methods for Wolves XIII. Southern Bait Methods for Coyotes XIV. Northern Bait Methods for Coyotes XV. Blind Set Methods XVI. Snow Set Methods XVII. Some Rules and Things to Remember XVIII. The Treacherous Grey Wolf XIX. Wolf Catching XX. With the Coyotes XXI. Wolf Trapping an Art LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS. Map Showing the Range of the Timber Wolf Western Grey Wolf in a Trap Track of the Grey Wolf Coyote and Badger Killed in Texas A Trapped Coyote Track of the Coyote Wolves Killing a Deer Remains of Deer Killed by Wolves Grey Wolf Diagrams showing Difference in Size of Wolves and Coyotes A Wyoming Wolf Den A Near View of the Den Young Wolves at Entrance of Den The Hunter's Outfit An Oklahoma Hunter with Young Coyotes Catch of a Canadian Hunter A Still Hunter and His Outfit Killed by the Still Hunt Method of Preparing Poison Baits The Newhouse Wolf Trap The Two-Pronged Drag Method of Attaching an Oblong Stone Method of Attaching a Triangular Stone Iron Stakes for Traps Trap Set and Ready for Covering Wyoming Wolf Trapper Caught in a Scent Set Trail Bait Set The Square Setting Coyote Caught at a Bank Set Wolf Water Set A Trapped Wolf A Trapped Texas Coyote A Northern Coyote An Idaho Coyote A Trail Set Traps Set at Badger Den A Good Catch A Snow Set A Large Wisconsin Wolf Mr. Davis with the Big Wolf Skins A Texas Specimen Caught at Last A Northern Wolf INTRODUCTION. There are certain wild animals which when hard pressed by severe cold and hunger, will raid the farmers and ranchmen's yards, killing fowls and stock. There however, are no animals that destroy so much stock as wolves and coyotes as they largely live upon the property of farmers, settlers and ranchmen to which they add game as they can get it. While these animals are trapped, shot, poisoned, hunted with dogs, etc., their numbers, in some states, seem to be on the increase rather than the decrease in face of the fact that heavy bounties are offered. The fact that wolf and coyote scalps command a bounty, in many states, and in addition their pelts are valuable, makes the hunting and trapping of these animals of no little importance. One thing that has helped to keep the members of these "howlers" so numerous is the fact that they are among the shrewdest animal in America. The day of their extermination is, no doubt, far in the distance. This book contains much of value to those who expect to follow the business of catching wolves and coyotes. A great deal of the habits and many of the methods were written by Mr. E. Kreps, who has had experience with these animals upon the Western Plains, in Canada, and the South. Additional information has been secured from Government Bulletins and experienced "wolfers" from various parts of America. A. R. Harding. WOLF AND COYOTE TRAPPING CHAPTER I. THE TIMBER WOLF. Wolves of all species belong to that class of animals known as the dog family, the members of which are considered to be the most intelligent of brute animals. They are found, in one species or another, in almost every part of the world. They are strictly carnivorous and are beyond all doubt the most destructive of all wild animals. In general appearance the wolf resembles a large dog having erect ears, elongated muzzle, long heavy fur and bushy tail. The size and color varies considerably as there are many varieties. The wolves of North America may be divided into two distinct groups, namely, the large timber wolves, and the prairie wolves or coyotes (ki'-yote). Of the timber wolves there are a number of varieties, perhaps species, for there is considerable difference in size and color. For instance there is the small black wolf which is still found in Florida, and the large Arctic wolf which is found in far Northern Canada and Alaska, the color of which is a pure white with a black tip to the tail. Then there is that intermediate variety known as the Grey Wolf, also called "Timber Wolf," "Lobo" and "Wolf," the latter indefinite name being used throughout the West to distinguish the animal from the prairie species. It is the most common of the American wolves, the numbers of this variety being in excess of all of the others combined. In addition to those mentioned, there are others such as the Red Wolf of Texas and the Brindled Wolf of Mexico. All of these, however, belong to the group known to naturalists as the Timber Wolves. Just how many species and how many distinct varieties there are is not known. As a rule, the largest wolves are found in the North; the Gray Wolves of the western plains being slightly smaller than the white and Dusky Wolves of Northern Canada and Alaska, specimens of which, it is said, sometimes weigh as much as one hundred and fifty pounds. Again the wolves of the southern part of the United States and of Mexico are smaller than the gray variety. The Range of the Timber Wolf. The average full grown wolf will measure about five feet in length, from the end of the nose to the tip of the tail, and will weigh from eighty to one hundred pounds, but specimens have been killed which far exceeded these figures. The prevailing color is gray, being darkest on the back and dusky on the shoulders and hips. The tail is very bushy and the fur of the body is long and shaggy. The ears are erect and pointed, the muzzle long and heavy, the eyes brown and considering the fierce, bloodthirsty nature of the animal, have a very gentle expression. In early days wolves were found in all parts of the country but they have been exterminated or driven out of the thickly settled portions and their present distribution in the United States is shown by the accompanying map. As will be noted they are found in only a small portion of Nevada and none are found in California, but they are to be met with in all other states west of the Missouri and the lower Mississippi, also all of the most southern tier of states, as well as those parts bordering on Lake Superior. A few are yet found in the Smokey Mountains of North Carolina and Tennessee. They are probably most abundant in Northern Michigan and Northern Minnesota, Western Wyoming, Montana and New Mexico. Wyoming is the center of the wolf infested country and they are found in greatest numbers in that state, on the headwaters of the Green River. As to the numbers still found the report of the Biological Survey for the years 1895 to 1906, inclusive, but not including the year 1898, shows that bounties were paid on 20,819 wolves in that state. In Northern Michigan they are also abundant. In the year 1907, thirty-four wolves were killed in Ontonagon County; in Luce County fifty-four were killed up to November 10th, '07, and in Schoolcraft Co., thirty were killed from October 1st, '07 to April 29th, '08. This gives a total of one hundred and eighteen wolves killed in three out of the sixteen counties of the Upper Peninsula. These statistics are from a pamphlet issued by the Department of Agriculture. The breeding season of the timber wolves is not as definite as that of many of the furbearing animals, for the young make their appearance from early in March until in May, and an occasional litter will be born during the summer, even as late as August. The mating season of course varies, but is mainly in January and February, the period of gestation being nine weeks. The number in a litter varies from five to thirteen, the usual number being eight or ten. In early days the wolves of the western plains followed the great buffalo herds and preyed on the young animals, also the old and feeble. After the extermination of that animal they turned their attention to the herds of cattle which soon covered the great western range and their depredations have become a positive nuisance. In the Northern States and throughout Canada they subsist almost entirely on wild game. Western Grey Wolf in a Trap. Wolves den in the ground or rocks in natural dens if such can be found, but in case natural excavations are rare as in northern portions of the country, they appropriate and enlarge the homes of other animals. In the heavily timbered country they sometimes den in hollow logs. The wolf is both cowardly and courageous, depending on circumstances. When found singly, and especially in daylight the animal is as much of a coward as any creature could possibly be, and especially does it fear man.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Alaska's Predator Control Programs
    Alaska’sAlaska’s PredatorPredator ControlControl ProgramsPrograms Managing for Abundance or Abundant Mismanagement? In 1995, Alaska Governor Tony Knowles responded to negative publicity over his state’s predator control programs by requesting a National Academy of Sciences review of Alaska’s entire approach to predator control. Following the review Governor Knowles announced that no program should be considered unless it met three criteria: cost-effectiveness, scientific scrutiny and broad public acceptability. The National Academy of Sciences’ National Research Council (NRC) released its review, Wolves, Bears, and Their Prey in Alaska, in 1997, drawing conclusions and making recommendations for management of Alaska’s predators and prey. In 1996, prior to the release of the NRC report, the Wolf Management Reform Coalition, a group dedicated to promoting fair-chase hunting and responsible management of wolves in Alaska, published Showdown in Alaska to document the rise of wolf control in Alaska and the efforts undertaken to stop it. This report, Alaska’s Predator Control Programs: Managing for Abundance or Abundant Mismanagement? picks up where that 1996 report left off. Acknowledgements Authors: Caroline Kennedy, Theresa Fiorino Editor: Kate Davies Designer: Pete Corcoran DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE Defenders of Wildlife is a national, nonprofit membership organization dedicated to the protection of all native wild animals and plants in their natural communities. www.defenders.org Cover photo: © Nick Jans © 2011 Defenders of Wildlife 1130 17th Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036-4604 202.682.9400 333 West 4th Avenue, Suite 302 Anchorage, AK 99501 907.276.9453 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................... 2 2. The National Research Council Review ......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Should We Hunt Gray Wolves in Michigan?
    SHOULD WE HUNT GRAY WOLVES IN MICHIGAN? AUGUST 2018 Dean’s Welcome Welcome, SEAS students! Before you know it, you will be boarding a bus with your classmates, headed for the University of Michigan Biological Station (the “Biostation”) in beautiful Northern Michigan—or “Up North” as Michiganders call it. There, during an immersive orientation experience, you will explore, learn, bond—and become an integral part of our community. This is just the beginning of your graduate career at SEAS, throughout which we will work together to solve some of the world’s most complex environmental problems. This is why you chose SEAS, and why we chose you. It is all very exciting, and we cannot wait to get started. So, why wait? The following case study details an active issue in the state of Michigan: whether or not to allow a public wolf hunt. During your time at the Biostation, you will be asked to examine the issue from opposing, nuanced perspectives, challenging your own gut reaction to the problem. Discussions will be guided by the scientific, political, economic, and social analyses included in these pages. You will actively collaborate with your classmates to uncover and synthesize facts, ultimately building a responsible, sustainable policy recommendation on Michigan’s wolf population. To prepare, simply read the case study and let it simmer. There is no need to do additional research. Enjoy your time at orientation. Get to know your classmates. Explore the gorgeous landscape. And then, come September 4th, join us back at the Dana Building ready to launch your graduate education and set out on a path of meaningful work—work that will have an impact on generations to come.
    [Show full text]
  • California Department of Fish & Wildlife Trapping License
    California Department of Fish & Wildlife Trapping License Examination Reference Guide LAS 7007 (Revised 10/15) Table of Contents List of Appendices………………………………………………………………...ii Introduction………………………………………………………………………..1 Acknowledgments…………………………………………………………………2 Summary of Trapping Laws and Regulations..........................................................3 Title 14 California Code of Regulations……………………………………….…..5 California Fish and Game Code……………………………………………….….25 Infectious Wildlife Diseases and Parasites..............................................................36 Species Information Badgers……………………………………………………………………….…..68 Bats………………………………………………………………………….……71 Beavers…………………………………………………………………….……..91 Bobcats……………………………………………………………………...…...100 Coyotes………………………………………………………...………….......…107 Foxes……………………………………………………………………….….…125 Minks………………………………………………………………………….....130 Muskrats………………………………………………………...…………...…...133 Opossums……………………………………………………………………...…139 Raccoons……………………………………………………………………..…..144 Skunks………………………………………………………………………..…..151 Weasels……………………………………………………………………...……157 i LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDIX A. Special Animals…………………………………………………….….161 APPENDIX B. Common Gray Fox……...………………………………………….….169 APPENDIX C. Kit Fox…………………..………………………………………….….171 APPENDIX D. Red Fox........................................................................................…......174 APPENDIX E. Guidelines for Excluding Bats...………………………….…………….178 APPENDIX F. Unwanted guests: Evicting bats from human dwellings…………….…180 ii CALIFORNIA
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Wolf Hunting Policy on Moose Populations in Northern Minnesota Thomas J Mackey† and Thomas Bryce Kelly*
    Impact of wolf hunting policy on moose populations in northern Minnesota Thomas J Mackey† and Thomas Bryce Kelly* *Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA. Email: [email protected] 5 † Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA. Email: [email protected] s t n i r P e 10 r P 15 Abstract An ongoing and politically sensitive aspect of proper ecological stewardship revolves around improving the conditions and health of all of the species in the area of 20 concern including both predator and prey species. Human industrial activities have dramatically reduced the land area available to the native species which has placed stresses and fragility into the ecological web. Maintaining proper ecological dynamics has become a critical aspect of policy initiatives designed to safeguard our natural reserves including the establishment of ecological forests and sanctuaries. Herein we 25 outline our proposal to tackle a central issue in wildlife management: improving our knowledge of predator-prey dynamics that vary both temporally and specially in non- linear ways. By leveraging techniques pioneered in other disciplines in addition to the traditional methods, we aim to drastically improve our understanding of the Moose-Grey Wolf interaction and to develop a system with applicability in other regions and other 30 species. PeerJ PrePrints | http://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.769v2 | CC-BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 31 Dec 2014, publ: 31 Dec 2014 2 | Mackey and Kelly Introduction Northern Minnesota exists at the southern boundary of Moose (Alces alces) distributions in central North America. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 5 (Minnesota DNR) conducts annual aerial plot surveys to estimate Moose populations.
    [Show full text]
  • February 2021 Wolf Hunting and Trapping Regulations
    FEBRUARY 2021 WOLF HUNTING AND TRAPPING REGULATIONS The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Provides equal opportunity in its employment, programs, services and functions under an Affirmative Action Plan. If you have any questions, please write to: Chief, Public Civil Rights, Office of Civil Rights, U.S. Department of the Interior, 1849 C. Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20240. This publication is available in alternative format (large print, Braille, etc.) upon request. Please call Accessibility Coordinator at 608-267-7490 for more information. REMEMBER • You must notify the DNR within 24 hours of harvest by visiting GameReg. wi.gov or by calling 844-GAMEREG (844-426-3734 • You must also exhibit your wolf to an authorized DNR representative (usually a Conservation Warden) for registration and tagging no later than March 7, 2021. -Before registering a wolf with an authorized DNR representative, you must skin the animal and separate the pelt from the carcass. Be sure it is thawed out on the day of registration so that the registration tag can be attached. This does not need to be completed before registration for specimens going to a taxidermist. Persons who intend to have the wolf mounted by a taxidermist may exhibit the wolf to the department for registration without separating the pelt. The skinned carcass must be exhibited to the department within 30 days of registration. (Note: These animals must still be registered prior to taxidermy). -Contact the local Conservation Warden or wildlife biologist or call 888- 936-7463 to determine available times for registration. • This pamphlet gives a summary of Wisconsin’s wolf hunting and trapping laws and how they affect you; it is not a complete set of all the hunting- related laws.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Communities Are Welcoming Hunters and Anglers
    Potential Costs of Losing Hunting and Trapping as Wildlife Management Methods Updated: May 25th, 2005 Produced by the Animal Use Issues Committee of the International Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies 444 North Capitol Street, NW Suite 725 Washington, DC 20001 (202) 624-7890 www.IAFWA.org i Acknowledgements This report was developed for the Animal Use Issues Committee of the International Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies (IAFWA). Funding was provided by the Wildlife Restoration Program through Multistate Conservation Grant DC M-35-O awarded to the International Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. This report was authored by Rob Southwick, Ashley Woolley and Donna Leonard of Southwick Associates, Inc., Fernandina Beach, FL., and Sharon Rushton of Killingworth, CT. The project was conceived and championed by Bob Carmichael, Manitoba Department of Natural Resources, and guided in part by Bruce Taubert, Arizona Game and Fish Department; Gordon Robertson, American Sportfishing Association; Don MacLauchlan and Jen Mock, IAFWA; and Mike S. O’Brien, Nova Scotia Department of Natural Resources. A special thank you goes to Rob Cahill, Fur Institute of Canada, for ensuring Canadian data and issues were a part of this report. Data was provided by many state, provincial, federal and private agencies and sources, with special mention to Martin Mendoza of the USDA’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS). Stephanie Kenyon and Carol Wynne, Point to Point Communications, Leesburg, Va., provided invaluable editorial and strategic guidance. Reviews and expertise were provided by Alan Clark, Utah Division of Wildlife Resources; Buddy Baker, South Carolina Department of Natural Resources; Gordon Batchellor, New York Department of Environmental Conservation; and John Erb of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources.
    [Show full text]
  • A Statement by an International Group of Academics, Including Ethicists, Philosophers and Theologians
    A statement by an international group of academics, including ethicists, philosophers and theologians. Author: The Revd Professor Andrew Linzey, PhD, DD ABOUT THE AUTHOR About the Author The Revd Professor Andrew Linzey, PhD, DD is a member of the Faculty of Theology in the University of Oxford, and holds the world’s first post in Ethics, Theology and Animal Welfare - the Bede Jarrett Senior Research Fellowship - at Blackfriars Hall, Oxford. He is also Honorary Professor in Theology at the University of Birmingham, and Special Professor at Saint Xavier University, Chicago. From 1992-6, he was Special Professor in Theology at the University of Nottingham, and in 1996 was appointed Visiting Professor at the Koret School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Jerusalem. He has written or edited 20 books, including major works on animals: Animal Theology (SCM Press and University of Illinois Press, 1994), Animals on the Agenda (SCM Press and University of Illinois Press, 1998), and Animal Rights: A Historical Anthology (Columbia University Press, 2005). In 2001, he was awarded a Doctor of Divinity degree by the Archbishop of Canterbury in recognition of his ‘unique and pioneering work’ on the ‘rights and welfare of God’s sentient creatures’. He can be contacted at [email protected] Published by Respect for Animals The Humane Society of the United States PO Box 6500 2100 L St. NW Nottingham NG4 3GB Washington, DC 20037 Tel: 0115 952 5440 (301)-258-3109 www.respectforanimals.org [email protected] [email protected] www.ProtectSeals.org © Copyright, Andrew Linzey, 2005 ISBN: 0-9547208-1-4 PUBLIC MORALITY AND THE CANADIAN SEAL HUNT Public Morality and the Canadian Seal Hunt A statement by an international group of academics, including ethicists, philosophers and theologians.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Plan for Gray Wolves in California PART I December 2016
    California Department of Fish and Wildlife Conservation Plan for Gray Wolves in California Part I December 2016 Charlton H. Bonham, Director Cover photograph by Gary Kramer This document should be cited as: Kovacs, K. E., K.E. Converse, M.C. Stopher, J.H. Hobbs, M.L. Sommer, P.J. Figura, D.A. Applebee, D.L. Clifford, and D.J. Michaels. Conservation Plan for Gray Wolves in California. 2016. California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Sacramento, CA 329 pp. The preparers want to acknowledge Department of Fish and Wildlife staff who contributed to the preparation of this document. They include Steve Torres, Angela Donlan, and Kirsten Macintyre. Further, we appreciate the agencies and staff from the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Washington Department of Wildlife, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for their generous support in our efforts to prepare this document. We are also indebted to our facilitation experts at Kearns and West, specifically Sam Magill. Table of Contents – PART I INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 2 Plan Development ....................................................................................................................................... 2 Plan Goals ..................................................................................................................................................... 4 Summary of Historical Distribution and Abundance of Wolves in California .....................................
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Patterns of Predation by Cougars and Recolonizing Wolves in Montana’S Madison Range
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln USDA National Wildlife Research Center - Staff U.S. Department of Agriculture: Animal and Publications Plant Health Inspection Service May 2007 Comparative Patterns of Predation by Cougars and Recolonizing Wolves in Montana’s Madison Range Todd C. Atwood Utah State University, Logan, UT Eric M. Gese USDA/APHIS/WS National Wildlife Research Center, [email protected] Kyran E. Kunkel Utah State University, Logan, UT Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdm_usdanwrc Part of the Environmental Sciences Commons Atwood, Todd C.; Gese, Eric M.; and Kunkel, Kyran E., "Comparative Patterns of Predation by Cougars and Recolonizing Wolves in Montana’s Madison Range" (2007). USDA National Wildlife Research Center - Staff Publications. 696. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdm_usdanwrc/696 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Department of Agriculture: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in USDA National Wildlife Research Center - Staff Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Research Article Comparative Patterns of Predation by Cougars and Recolonizing Wolves in Montana’s Madison Range TODD C. ATWOOD,1,2 Department of Wildland Resources, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322, USA ERIC M. GESE, United States Department of Agriculture–Animal Plant Health Inspection Service–Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center, Department of Wildland Resources, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322, USA KYRAN E. KUNKEL, Department of Wildland Resources, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322, USA ABSTRACT Numerous studies have documented how prey may use antipredator strategies to reduce the risk of predation from a single predator.
    [Show full text]
  • Gray Wolves Are Undoubtedly Reclaiming Their Previous Territory at a Rapid Pace
    Species: Gray Wolf (Canis lupus) Diet: Carnivore Size: 26-32 inches tall; 4.5-6.5 feet long and one of the largest mammalian carnivores found in the Pacific West, next to the Grizzly Bear, Black Bear and Mountain Lion (Cougar) Weight: 55-130 lbs. Delta Pack gray wolf, Yellowstone National Park. Lifespan in the wild: 7-8 years Credit: USNPS. Diet: Primary prey consists of ungulates, or hoofed mammals, such as deer or elk. Though wolves generally rely on large prey species, they are opportunists and have also been known to consume smaller mammals, such as beavers or rabbits, as well as scavenge upon already-dead animals. During periods of abundant food, wolves can eat up to 30 pounds of meat per day. Fluctuating environmental conditions require wolves to adapt to sudden abundances of prey often followed by days of prey scarcity. Roosevelt bull elk. Behavior: Wolves are social animals that usually Credit: ODFW. live in packs. Packs are typically family groups that consist of a breeding male and female (also called the breeding pair) and their offspring. Sometimes called “alphas,” the breeding pair are usually responsible for tracking and hunting prey, establishing territories, finding den sites, and reproducing. Subordinate wolves often assist in rearing young pups, hunting, and other responsibilities. Sometimes wolves depart from their pack to establish new territories and form new packs. This is called dispersal. One of the most exciting aspects of wolf © Pacific Wolf Coalition, Summer 2017 1 research is our constantly-evolving understanding of their complex social dynamics. Communication is an important component of wolves’ social structures.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Niche Separation Between Wolves and Cougars Realized in the Rocky Mountains?
    Is niche separation between wolves and cougars realized in the Rocky Mountains? by Kerri Elizabeth Krawchuk A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Ecology Department of Biological Sciences University of Alberta © Kerri Elizabeth Krawchuk, 2014 ABSTRACT Multiple carnivore species can have greater population limiting effects than single carnivores. Two coexisting carnivores can only be similar up to a certain extent. I investigate how two carnivores, wolves (Canis lupus) and cougars (Puma concolor), coexist through niche partitioning in the central east slopes of the Alberta Rocky Mountains. Wolf packs spatio- temporally avoided other wolf packs more than they did cougars, while cougars avoided conspecifics as much as wolves. Reinforcing spatial separation, temporally wolves had two crepuscular movement peaks while cougars had just one. Male cougar movements peaked in the late evening and was high over night, while female cougar movement increased throughout the day and peaked in the evening. Female cougars selected different habitat features from male cougars and from wolves during both the day and night, while male cougars had more habitat selection differences from wolves at night. I found some evidence that cougars were more influenced by landscape features than wolves. Differences in the predators’ habitat selection were primarily for prey density contingent upon habitat features, likely related to maximizing hunting efficiency. Both species killed primarily deer (Odocoileus virginianus, O. hemionus), though wolves and male cougars killed and selected more large-bodied ungulate prey, such as elk (Cervus elaphus), moose (Alces alces) and/or feral horses (Equus calabus) than female cougars, who strongly selected for deer.
    [Show full text]
  • Predators in the 'Hood
    NEWSFOCUS on October 3, 2013 www.sciencemag.org At home. An American black bear roamed downtown Predators in the ‘Hood Aspen, Colorado, on a summer night. especially in cities of the western United States, seem willing to have them back, says As cougars, coyotes, and bears spread into backyards and downtowns, Stanley Gehrt, a wildlife biologist at Ohio science is helping to show how people and predators can coexist State University, Columbus, who tracks Downloaded from Chicago’s coyotes. That leaves scientists, TWO YEARS AGO, IN JUNE 2011, A COUGAR Once hunted nearly to extinction in conservationists, and wildlife managers wandered through backyards and peered the lower 48, America’s biggest preda- all scrambling to figure out how to best into homes in Milford, Connecticut, the tors are making a remarkable comeback. manage animals that literally live next door fi rst mountain lion in that state in more than Their return has sparked a range of emo- and are capable of killing humans. “If you’re 100 years. Later that same year, a gray wolf tions, from surprise and joy to demands that interested in large carnivores, it’s a very crossed the Oregon border into California, the the animals be harshly controlled, if not exciting time,” Gehrt says. “There are more fi rst wolf in that state in more than 80 years. shot outright. Europe is expe- people than ever and yet we’re Black bears now lumber through subdivisions riencing a similar resurgence, seeing a resurgence and accep- in Ohio and Missouri, states that were bearless and similar reactions (Science, Online tance of these predators.
    [Show full text]