Bering Sea Marine Invasive Species Assessment Alaska Center for Conservation Science

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Bering Sea Marine Invasive Species Assessment Alaska Center for Conservation Science Bering Sea Marine Invasive Species Assessment Alaska Center for Conservation Science Scientific Name: Petricolaria pholadiformis Phylum Mollusca Common Name false angelwing Class Bivalvia Order Veneroida Family Petricolidae Z:\GAP\NPRB Marine Invasives\NPRB_DB\SppMaps\PETPHO.pn g 164 Final Rank 44.11 Data Deficiency: 8.75 Category Scores and Data Deficiencies Total Data Deficient Category Score Possible Points Distribution and Habitat: 13.5 26 3.75 Anthropogenic Influence: 4 10 0 Biological Characteristics: 19.5 25 5.00 Impacts: 3.25 30 0 Figure 1. Occurrence records for non-native species, and their geographic proximity to the Bering Sea. Ecoregions are based on the classification system by Spalding et al. (2007). Totals: 40.25 91.25 8.75 Occurrence record data source(s): NEMESIS and NAS databases. General Biological Information Tolerances and Thresholds Minimum Temperature (°C) 1 Minimum Salinity (ppt) 10 Maximum Temperature (°C) 26 Maximum Salinity (ppt) 35 Minimum Reproductive Temperature (°C) NA Minimum Reproductive Salinity (ppt) 31* Maximum Reproductive Temperature (°C) NA Maximum Reproductive Salinity (ppt) 35* Additional Notes Petricolaria pholadiformis is a bivalve with an elongated white shell. Many lines radiate from the umbo, and the first ten of these are rather well-defined. The shell is also marked by concentric growth lines. Adult shells measure ~55 mm. Adults live burrowed in substrates such as mud, soft rock, or clay. P. pholadiformis is native to eastern North America, and has been introduced to Europe and the western coast of North America. The most likely vectors of introduction for this species are accidental transport with the Eastern oyster (Crassostrea virginica), and transport via ballast water. Report updated on Wednesday, December 06, 2017 Page 1 of 13 1. Distribution and Habitat 1.1 Survival requirements - Water temperature Choice: Little overlap – A small area (<25%) of the Bering Sea has temperatures suitable for year-round survival Score: C 1.25 of High uncertainty? 3.75 Ranking Rationale: Background Information: Temperatures required for year-round survival occur in a limited This species has been reported from Penobscot Bay, ME where water area (<25%) of the Bering Sea. Thresholds are based on geographic temperatures range from 1.1 to 14.1°C (NERACOOS 2016). In its distribution, which may not represent physiological tolerances; we native range, this species occurs as far south as Padre Island, TX (in the therefore ranked this question with "High uncertainty". Gulf of Mexico), where water temperatures >26°C have been recorded (NOAA 2017). Sources: NERACOOS 2016 NOAA 2017 1.2 Survival requirements - Water salinity Choice: Considerable overlap – A large area (>75%) of the Bering Sea has salinities suitable for year-round survival Score: A 3.75 of 3.75 Ranking Rationale: Background Information: Salinities required for year-round survival occur over a large Based on its geographic distribution, this species can tolerate salinities (>75%) area of the Bering Sea. up to 35 ppt (Fofonoff et al. 2003). Although it is a marine species, it is usually associated with sites that have some freshwater inflow. Experiments by Castagna and Chalney (1973, qtd. in Fofonoff et al. 2003) found high (90%) survival rates in individuals exposed to 10 ppt water for 52 to 92 days. Sources: NEMESIS; Fofonoff et al. 2003 1.3 Establishment requirements - Water temperature Choice: Unknown/Data Deficient Score: U of Ranking Rationale: Background Information: More information is needed to establish reproductive temperature Duval (1963) observed larvae and spawning at water temperatures requirements for this species. between 16 and 19°C. Sources: NEMESIS; Fofonoff et al. 2003 Duval 1963 Report updated on Wednesday, December 06, 2017 Page 2 of 13 1.4 Establishment requirements - Water salinity Choice: Considerable overlap – A large area (>75%) of the Bering Sea has salinities suitable for reproduction Score: A 3.75 of High uncertainty? 3.75 Ranking Rationale: Background Information: Although salinity thresholds are unknown, this species is a marine No information found. organism that does not require freshwater to reproduce. We therefore assume that this species can reproduce in saltwater (31 to 35 ppt). These salinities occur in a large (>75%) portion of the Bering Sea. Sources: NEMESIS; Fofonoff et al. 2003 1.5 Local ecoregional distribution Choice: Present in an ecoregion greater than two regions away from the Bering Sea Score: D 1.25 of 5 Ranking Rationale: Background Information: This species is found in southern BC and in WA. On the west coast of North America, this species occurs in WA and southern BC. Individuals have been found in CA, but it is unknown whether there are established populations. Sources: NEMESIS; Fofonoff et al. 2003 1.6 Global ecoregional distribution Choice: In few ecoregions globally Score: C 1.75 of 5 Ranking Rationale: Background Information: This species has only been reported from a few ecoregions, mostly This species has a broad native range, from PEI to FL, and west to TX. in northern Europe and in limited areas of western North America. On the west coast of North America, populations are established in WA and BC. In Europe, this species has been found in England, and in the North Sea off the coasts of Belgium, Denmark, and Norway. It is also present in western Sweden. Populations have also been found in Greece, where they were likely introduced by ballast water. Sources: NEMESIS; Fofonoff et al. 2003 Report updated on Wednesday, December 06, 2017 Page 3 of 13 1.7 Current distribution trends Choice: Established outside of native range, but no evidence of rapid expansion or long-distance dispersal Score: C 1.75 of 5 Ranking Rationale: Background Information: This species has failed to establish in CA. Introductions have been This species has likely been introduced accidentally with Eastern attributed to transport by anthropogenic vectors, rather than natural oysters, or by ballast water (Fofonoff et al. 2003). Individuals have been dispersal. This species has a restricted worldwide distribution, and found in CA, but do not seem to have established populations there. we have not found evidence of a rapid range expansion for this Zenetos et al. (2009) rejected the possibility that this soecies was species. introduced to the Mediterranean by natural dispersal. Sources: NEMESIS; Fofonoff et al. 2003 Zenetos et al. 2009 Section Total - Scored Points: 13.5 Section Total - Possible Points: 26.25 Section Total -Data Deficient Points: 3.75 Report updated on Wednesday, December 06, 2017 Page 4 of 13 2. Anthropogenic Transportation and Establishment 2.1 Transport requirements: relies on use of shipping lanes (hull fouling, ballast water), fisheries, recreation, mariculture, etc. for transport Choice: Has been observed using anthropogenic vectors for transport and transports independent of any anthropogenic vector once Score: A introduced 4 of 4 Ranking Rationale: Background Information: Believed to be transported by hitchhiking or ballast water. Its Introduced outside of its native range by hitchhiking or by ballast water spread in northern Europe has been attributed to natural, larval (Fofonoff et al. 2003). Rosenthal (1980) claims that this species spread dispersal. through northern Europe naturally. In Greece, however, this species has a very disjunct distribution, occurring there and nowhere else along the Mediterranean. For this reason, Zenetos et al. (2009) believe that P. pholadiformis was introduced in Greece by human vectors. Sources: NEMESIS; Fofonoff et al. 2003 Zenetos et al. 2009 Rosenthal 1980 2.2 Establishment requirements: relies on marine infrastructure, (e.g. harbors, ports) to establish Choice: Does not use anthropogenic disturbance/infrastructure to establish Score: D 0 of 4 Ranking Rationale: Background Information: This species burrows and establishes in natural substrates. Burrows in natural substrates including mud, peat, clay, and wood (Zenetos et al. 2009). Sources: Zenetos et al. 2009 2.3 Is this species currently or potentially farmed or otherwise intentionally cultivated? Choice: No Score: B 0 of 2 Ranking Rationale: Background Information: This species is not farmed or cultivated. Although this species is edible, it is not farmed. Sources: NEMESIS; Fofonoff et al. 2003 Section Total - Scored Points: 4 Section Total - Possible Points: 10 Section Total -Data Deficient Points: 0 Report updated on Wednesday, December 06, 2017 Page 5 of 13 3. Biological Characteristics 3.1 Dietary specialization Choice: Generalist at all life stages and/or foods are readily available in the study area Score: A 5 of 5 Ranking Rationale: Background Information: Food items for this species are readily available in the Bering Sea. This species is a filter feeder that consumes phytoplankton and other particles. Sources: NEMESIS; Fofonoff et al. 2003 3.2 Habitat specialization and water tolerances Does the species use a variety of habitats or tolerate a wide range of temperatures, salinity regimes, dissolved oxygen levels, calcium concentrations, hydrodynamics, pollution, etc? Choice: Generalist; wide range of habitat tolerances at all life stages Score: A 5 of 5 Ranking Rationale: Background Information: This species can tolerate a range of environmental conditions and This species requires a burrows in moderately soft substrates (e.g., clay, substrate types. mud, chalk, wood) (Tillin and Budd 2008; Zenetos et al. 2009). However, this species is not a boring specialist and cannot burrow into very
Recommended publications
  • Index of Organisms
    Index of organisms Nomenclators are listed where supplied by the authors. Abies lasiocarpa 367 A. tetramerus 613 Ablabesmyia sp. 590 Aeschynomene spp. 325 Abramites solarii 612 A. elaphyroxylon (Guill. & Perr.) Taub. Acacia sp. 235, 369, 63~0 205 A. albida 18, 235 A. montevidensis 560 A. caven 603, 605, 608 A. sensitiva 324 A. greggi 368 Aetonylaeus nichofi 740 A. karroo Hayne 104, 110 Afrobaetodes sp. Demoulin 1970, 130 A. nilotica 18 Afrochiltonia sp. 650 A. raddiana 18 Afrocyclops curticornis (Kiefer 1932) 53 A. stenophylla 646' A. gibsoni (Brady 1904) 53, 75 Acanthocyclops michaelseni 592 Afromastacembelus spp. (see also Mastacem- A. robustus 550 belus) 274, 276 Acanthopsis choirorhynchos 738 Afronurus sp. Lestage 1924, 130-131 Acer negundo 367 Afroplocia sp. Lestage 1918, 130 Acestorhamphus sp. 577, 580 Afrosimulium gariepense 128-129 A. altus 612 Ageneiosus brevifillis 580, 614 A. jenynsi 612 A. valenciennesi 579, 614 Acestorhynchus sp. 577 Agosia chrysogaster Girard 387, 390, 393 A. falcatus 580, 612 Agrostis lachnantha Nees 103 Achirus jenynsi 614 A. subilifolia Stapf I 03 A. lineatus 614 Akysis spp. 738 Acroperus harpae (Baird 1836) 51, 77 Albizia hassleri 604 Acrorbis odhneri 590 Alathyria jacksoni Iredale 649-650 A. petricola 590 Alectis ciliaris 741 Acrossocheilus deauratus 739 Alepes kalla 741 Adansonia digitata 233-235 A/estes Miiller & Troschel spp. 32, 34, Adenophlebia sp. Eaton 1881, 130-131 36-37, 169, 193 Adenophleboides sp. Ulmer 1924, 130 A. baremose (Joannis 1835) 34, 36, 45, Adianthopsis chlorophylla 558 176-177 Aedomyia africana Neveu-Lemaire 195-196 A. dentex (Linne 1757) 30, 34, 176-177 Aegla sp. 590 A.
    [Show full text]
  • First Record of Atlantic Mud Piddock, Barnea (Anchomasa) Truncata (Bivalvia, Pholadidae) in Argentina
    Aquatic Invasions (2012) Volume 7, Issue 2: 283–286 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3391/ai.2012.7.2.015 Open Access © 2012 The Author(s). Journal compilation © 2012 REABIC Short Communication First record of Atlantic mud piddock, Barnea (Anchomasa) truncata (Bivalvia, Pholadidae) in Argentina Sandra M. Fiori1,2*, Pía Simonetti1 and Eder P. Dos Santos1 1 Instituto Argentino de Oceanografía, P.O. Box 804 (8000) Bahía Blanca, Argentina 2 Departamento de Biología, Bioquímica y Farmacia, Universidad Nacional del Sur, San Juan 670 (8000) Bahía Blanca, Argentina E-mail: [email protected] (SMF), [email protected] (PS), [email protected] (EPDS) *Corresponding author Received: 29 August 2011 / Accepted: 30 December 2011 / Published online: 28 January 2012 Abstract The present work reports the finding of an exotic bivalve, Barnea (Anchomasa) truncata, in the intertidal zone of the Bahía Blanca Estuary Argentina (38º Lat S), more than 2000 km south from the edge of its native range in South America (21º Lat S, Brazil). Lines of evidence suggest that larval transport by shipping is the probable entry route of this species. The most apparent modification created by the introduction of this species is the generation of greater complexity and habitat heterogeneity in the mud tidal plain of the estuary; the consequent effects on the local biota should therefore be evaluated. Key words: Pholadidae, non-indigenous bivalve, Bahía Blanca estuary, South America Introduction Two species belonging to this group commonly occur on the American Atlantic The introduction of exotic species is considered coasts: Barnea (Anchomasa) truncata (Say, one of the main threats to biodiversity at 1822) and Barnea (Anchomasa) lamellosa different scales and extent (IUCN 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Mollusca, Pholadidae, Xylophagainae)
    Turner: Xylopholas altenai 97 n. gen. n. sp. A new genus and species of deep water wood-boring bivalve (Mollusca, Pholadidae, Xylophagainae) by Ruth+D. Turner Museum ofComparativeZoology, Harvard University, Cambridge,Mass., U.S.A. The Xylophagainae are marine wood-boring bivalves which are confined than 150 largely to depths greater meters. They are not found the intertidal the sublittoral in zone, occur in only in higher latitudes, and are the sole wood-borers in depths over 200 meters. The greatest known depth for the invasion oftest wood by Teredini- dae is 200 meters (Tipper, 1968). The known depth range for the Xylophagainae extends from two meters below low tide in Millport, Scotland, to 7290 meters in the Banda Trench, off Ceram. Only occasionally are they found in drift wood, and this is usually after storms, the water logged wood having been lifted offthe bottom and carried ashore by strong waves. The discovery of the new genus and species described here is the result of a world-wide study of the Xylophagainae, a subfamily of the Pholadidae characterized by teredinid-like shells and a small, divided mesoplax. They lack apophyses (as do the Jouannetiinae) and do not produce a callum in the adult stage (as in the Phola- in dinae). They are unique among the Pholadidae having a wood- storing caecum. The author is grateful to Dr. Frederick Bayer, Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Miami, Dr. J0r- gen Knudsen, Universitetets Zoologiske Museum, Copenhagen, Den- mark, and Dr. W. Adam, Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, Brussels, Belgium, for the loan of specimens and the opportunity to remove specimens from dredged wood or other plant material in their collections.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Variability in Recruitment of an Infaunal Bivalve
    Spatial Variability in Recruitment of an Infaunal Bivalve: Experimental Effects of Predator Exclusion on the Softshell Clam (Mya arenaria L.) along Three Tidal Estuaries in Southern Maine, USA Author(s): Brian F. Beal, Chad R. Coffin, Sara F. Randall, Clint A. Goodenow Jr., Kyle E. Pepperman, Bennett W. Ellis, Cody B. Jourdet and George C. Protopopescu Source: Journal of Shellfish Research, 37(1):1-27. Published By: National Shellfisheries Association https://doi.org/10.2983/035.037.0101 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.2983/035.037.0101 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. Journal of Shellfish Research, Vol. 37, No. 1, 1–27, 2018. SPATIAL VARIABILITY IN RECRUITMENT OF AN INFAUNAL BIVALVE: EXPERIMENTAL EFFECTS OF PREDATOR EXCLUSION ON THE SOFTSHELL CLAM (MYA ARENARIA L.) ALONG THREE TIDAL ESTUARIES IN SOUTHERN MAINE, USA 1,2 3 2 3 BRIAN F.
    [Show full text]
  • OREGON ESTUARINE INVERTEBRATES an Illustrated Guide to the Common and Important Invertebrate Animals
    OREGON ESTUARINE INVERTEBRATES An Illustrated Guide to the Common and Important Invertebrate Animals By Paul Rudy, Jr. Lynn Hay Rudy Oregon Institute of Marine Biology University of Oregon Charleston, Oregon 97420 Contract No. 79-111 Project Officer Jay F. Watson U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 500 N.E. Multnomah Street Portland, Oregon 97232 Performed for National Coastal Ecosystems Team Office of Biological Services Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Department of Interior Washington, D.C. 20240 Table of Contents Introduction CNIDARIA Hydrozoa Aequorea aequorea ................................................................ 6 Obelia longissima .................................................................. 8 Polyorchis penicillatus 10 Tubularia crocea ................................................................. 12 Anthozoa Anthopleura artemisia ................................. 14 Anthopleura elegantissima .................................................. 16 Haliplanella luciae .................................................................. 18 Nematostella vectensis ......................................................... 20 Metridium senile .................................................................... 22 NEMERTEA Amphiporus imparispinosus ................................................ 24 Carinoma mutabilis ................................................................ 26 Cerebratulus californiensis .................................................. 28 Lineus ruber .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Boring Bivalve Mollusks from Isla Margarita, Venezuela
    ISSN 0738-9388 247 Volume: 49 THE FESTIVUS ISSUE 3 Marine boring bivalve mollusks from Isla Margarita, Venezuela Marcel Velásquez 1 1 Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Sorbonne Universites, 43 Rue Cuvier, F-75231 Paris, France; [email protected] Paul Valentich-Scott 2 2 Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History, Santa Barbara, California, 93105, USA; [email protected] Juan Carlos Capelo 3 3 Estación de Investigaciones Marinas de Margarita. Fundación La Salle de Ciencias Naturales. Apartado 144 Porlama,. Isla de Margarita, Venezuela. ABSTRACT Marine endolithic and wood-boring bivalve mollusks living in rocks, corals, wood, and shells were surveyed on the Caribbean coast of Venezuela at Isla Margarita between 2004 and 2008. These surveys were supplemented with boring mollusk data from malacological collections in Venezuelan museums. A total of 571 individuals, corresponding to 3 orders, 4 families, 15 genera, and 20 species were identified and analyzed. The species with the widest distribution were: Leiosolenus aristatus which was found in 14 of the 24 localities, followed by Leiosolenus bisulcatus and Choristodon robustus, found in eight and six localities, respectively. The remaining species had low densities in the region, being collected in only one to four of the localities sampled. The total number of species reported here represents 68% of the boring mollusks that have been documented in Venezuelan coastal waters. This study represents the first work focused exclusively on the examination of the cryptofaunal mollusks of Isla Margarita, Venezuela. KEY WORDS Shipworms, cryptofauna, Teredinidae, Pholadidae, Gastrochaenidae, Mytilidae, Petricolidae, Margarita Island, Isla Margarita Venezuela, boring bivalves, endolithic. INTRODUCTION The lithophagans (Mytilidae) are among the Bivalve mollusks from a range of families have more recognized boring mollusks.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Alien Molluscs from Iskenderun Bay (SE Turkey)
    Aquatic Invasions (2006) Volume 1, Issue 2: 76-79 DOI 10.3391/ai.2006.1.2.4 © 2006 The Author(s) Journal compilation © 2006 REABIC (http://www.reabic.net) This is an Open Access article Research article Three alien molluscs from Iskenderun Bay (SE Turkey) Doğan Çeviker1 and Serhat Albayrak2* 1Itri Sokak No:2 34349 Balmumcu-Istanbul, Turkey E-mail: [email protected] 2Istanbul University, Faculty of Science, Department of Biology 34118 Vezneciler-Istanbul, Turkey E-mail: [email protected] *Corresponding author Received 26 April 2006; accepted in revised form 4 May 2006 Abstract This study reports the presence of three alien molluscs from Iskenderun Bay (SE Turkey). Amathina tricarinata (Linnaeus, 1767) and Petricola hemprichi Issel, 1869 have prior records from other regions of Mediterranean, but, Cardites akabana (Sturany, 1899) first recorded in this paper. Since all of them are present in the Red Sea or Suez Canal, they can be considered as Lessepsian immigrants. Key words: Mollusca, alien species, Mediterranean, Turkey Introduction that 88 % of the exotic molluscs are Lessepsian immigrants in the eastern Mediterranean (Galil The Mediterranean Sea hosts about 8500 species and Zenetos 2002). Detailed data about these species of macroscopic animals. This rich biodiversity, are available on the Internet (www.ciesm.org/atlas). representing 8-9 % of total species number of the Either Lessepsian or non-Lessepsian, many world’s seas, comprises temperate and sub- new non-indigenous species continue to enter the tropical elements together with endemic and Mediterranean. alien species (Zenetos et al. 2002). The eastern Mediterranean is most vulnerable The introduction of alien species (also known to invasion and should be continuously as exotic, introduced or non-native species) into monitored.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleocene Freshwater, Brackish-Water and Marine Molluscs from Al-Khodh, Oman
    Late Cretaceous to ?Paleocene freshwater, brackish-water and marine molluscs from Al-Khodh, Oman Simon Schneider, heinz A. KollmAnn & mArtin PicKford Bivalvia and Gastropoda from the late Campanian to Maastrichtian deltaic Al-Khodh Formation and from the overlying ?Paleocene shallow marine Jafnayn Limestone Formation of northeastern Oman are described. Freshwater bivalves include three species of Unionidae, left in open nomenclature, due to limited preservation. These are the first pre-Pleistocene unionids recorded from the Arabian Peninsula, where large freshwater bivalves are absent today. Brackish-water bivalves are represented by two species of Cyrenidae. Geloina amithoscutana sp. nov. extends the range of Geloina to the Mesozoic and to ancient Africa. Muscatella biszczukae gen. et sp. nov. has a unique combination of characters not shared with other genera in the Cyrenidae. Brackish-water gastropods comprise Stephaniphera coronata gen. et sp. nov. in the Hemisinidae; Subtemenia morgani in the new genus Subtemenia (Pseudomelaniidae); Cosinia sp. (Thiaridae); Pyrazus sp. (Batillariidae); and Ringiculidae sp. indet. From the Jafnayn Limestone Formation, several marginal marine mollusc taxa are also reported. The fossils are assigned to four mollusc communities and associations, which are indicative of different salinity regimes. • Key words: Unionidae, Cyrenidae, Pseudomelaniidae, Hemisinidae, taxonomy, palaeobiogeography. SCHNEIDER, S., KOLLMANN, H.A. & PICKFORD, M. 2020. Late Cretaceous to ?Paleocene freshwater, brackish-water and marine molluscs from Al-Khodh, Oman. Bulletin of Geosciences 95(2), 179–204 (10 figures, 5 tables). Czech Geo- l ogical Survey, Prague. ISSN 1214-1119. Manuscript received August 12, 2019; accepted in revised form March 30, 2020; published online May 30, 2020; issued May 30, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated Checklist of the Marine Macroinvertebrates of Alaska David T
    NOAA Professional Paper NMFS 19 An annotated checklist of the marine macroinvertebrates of Alaska David T. Drumm • Katherine P. Maslenikov Robert Van Syoc • James W. Orr • Robert R. Lauth Duane E. Stevenson • Theodore W. Pietsch November 2016 U.S. Department of Commerce NOAA Professional Penny Pritzker Secretary of Commerce National Oceanic Papers NMFS and Atmospheric Administration Kathryn D. Sullivan Scientific Editor* Administrator Richard Langton National Marine National Marine Fisheries Service Fisheries Service Northeast Fisheries Science Center Maine Field Station Eileen Sobeck 17 Godfrey Drive, Suite 1 Assistant Administrator Orono, Maine 04473 for Fisheries Associate Editor Kathryn Dennis National Marine Fisheries Service Office of Science and Technology Economics and Social Analysis Division 1845 Wasp Blvd., Bldg. 178 Honolulu, Hawaii 96818 Managing Editor Shelley Arenas National Marine Fisheries Service Scientific Publications Office 7600 Sand Point Way NE Seattle, Washington 98115 Editorial Committee Ann C. Matarese National Marine Fisheries Service James W. Orr National Marine Fisheries Service The NOAA Professional Paper NMFS (ISSN 1931-4590) series is pub- lished by the Scientific Publications Of- *Bruce Mundy (PIFSC) was Scientific Editor during the fice, National Marine Fisheries Service, scientific editing and preparation of this report. NOAA, 7600 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, WA 98115. The Secretary of Commerce has The NOAA Professional Paper NMFS series carries peer-reviewed, lengthy original determined that the publication of research reports, taxonomic keys, species synopses, flora and fauna studies, and data- this series is necessary in the transac- intensive reports on investigations in fishery science, engineering, and economics. tion of the public business required by law of this Department.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Keys Species List
    FKNMS Species List A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T 1 Marine and Terrestrial Species of the Florida Keys 2 Phylum Subphylum Class Subclass Order Suborder Infraorder Superfamily Family Scientific Name Common Name Notes 3 1 Porifera (Sponges) Demospongia Dictyoceratida Spongiidae Euryspongia rosea species from G.P. Schmahl, BNP survey 4 2 Fasciospongia cerebriformis species from G.P. Schmahl, BNP survey 5 3 Hippospongia gossypina Velvet sponge 6 4 Hippospongia lachne Sheepswool sponge 7 5 Oligoceras violacea Tortugas survey, Wheaton list 8 6 Spongia barbara Yellow sponge 9 7 Spongia graminea Glove sponge 10 8 Spongia obscura Grass sponge 11 9 Spongia sterea Wire sponge 12 10 Irciniidae Ircinia campana Vase sponge 13 11 Ircinia felix Stinker sponge 14 12 Ircinia cf. Ramosa species from G.P. Schmahl, BNP survey 15 13 Ircinia strobilina Black-ball sponge 16 14 Smenospongia aurea species from G.P. Schmahl, BNP survey, Tortugas survey, Wheaton list 17 15 Thorecta horridus recorded from Keys by Wiedenmayer 18 16 Dendroceratida Dysideidae Dysidea etheria species from G.P. Schmahl, BNP survey; Tortugas survey, Wheaton list 19 17 Dysidea fragilis species from G.P. Schmahl, BNP survey; Tortugas survey, Wheaton list 20 18 Dysidea janiae species from G.P. Schmahl, BNP survey; Tortugas survey, Wheaton list 21 19 Dysidea variabilis species from G.P. Schmahl, BNP survey 22 20 Verongida Druinellidae Pseudoceratina crassa Branching tube sponge 23 21 Aplysinidae Aplysina archeri species from G.P. Schmahl, BNP survey 24 22 Aplysina cauliformis Row pore rope sponge 25 23 Aplysina fistularis Yellow tube sponge 26 24 Aplysina lacunosa 27 25 Verongula rigida Pitted sponge 28 26 Darwinellidae Aplysilla sulfurea species from G.P.
    [Show full text]
  • Molluscs: Bivalvia Laura A
    I Molluscs: Bivalvia Laura A. Brink The bivalves (also known as lamellibranchs or pelecypods) include such groups as the clams, mussels, scallops, and oysters. The class Bivalvia is one of the largest groups of invertebrates on the Pacific Northwest coast, with well over 150 species encompassing nine orders and 42 families (Table 1).Despite the fact that this class of mollusc is well represented in the Pacific Northwest, the larvae of only a few species have been identified and described in the scientific literature. The larvae of only 15 of the more common bivalves are described in this chapter. Six of these are introductions from the East Coast. There has been quite a bit of work aimed at rearing West Coast bivalve larvae in the lab, but this has lead to few larval descriptions. Reproduction and Development Most marine bivalves, like many marine invertebrates, are broadcast spawners (e.g., Crassostrea gigas, Macoma balthica, and Mya arenaria,); the males expel sperm into the seawater while females expel their eggs (Fig. 1).Fertilization of an egg by a sperm occurs within the water column. In some species, fertilization occurs within the female, with the zygotes then text continues on page 134 Fig. I. Generalized life cycle of marine bivalves (not to scale). 130 Identification Guide to Larval Marine Invertebrates ofthe Pacific Northwest Table 1. Species in the class Bivalvia from the Pacific Northwest (local species list from Kozloff, 1996). Species in bold indicate larvae described in this chapter. Order, Family Species Life References for Larval Descriptions History1 Nuculoida Nuculidae Nucula tenuis Acila castrensis FSP Strathmann, 1987; Zardus and Morse, 1998 Nuculanidae Nuculana harnata Nuculana rninuta Nuculana cellutita Yoldiidae Yoldia arnygdalea Yoldia scissurata Yoldia thraciaeforrnis Hutchings and Haedrich, 1984 Yoldia rnyalis Solemyoida Solemyidae Solemya reidi FSP Gustafson and Reid.
    [Show full text]
  • Invertebrate ID Guide
    11/13/13 1 This book is a compilation of identification resources for invertebrates found in stomach samples. By no means is it a complete list of all possible prey types. It is simply what has been found in past ChesMMAP and NEAMAP diet studies. A copy of this document is stored in both the ChesMMAP and NEAMAP lab network drives in a folder called ID Guides, along with other useful identification keys, articles, documents, and photos. If you want to see a larger version of any of the images in this document you can simply open the file and zoom in on the picture, or you can open the original file for the photo by navigating to the appropriate subfolder within the Fisheries Gut Lab folder. Other useful links for identification: Isopods http://www.19thcenturyscience.org/HMSC/HMSC-Reports/Zool-33/htm/doc.html http://www.19thcenturyscience.org/HMSC/HMSC-Reports/Zool-48/htm/doc.html Polychaetes http://web.vims.edu/bio/benthic/polychaete.html http://www.19thcenturyscience.org/HMSC/HMSC-Reports/Zool-34/htm/doc.html Cephalopods http://www.19thcenturyscience.org/HMSC/HMSC-Reports/Zool-44/htm/doc.html Amphipods http://www.19thcenturyscience.org/HMSC/HMSC-Reports/Zool-67/htm/doc.html Molluscs http://www.oceanica.cofc.edu/shellguide/ http://www.jaxshells.org/slife4.htm Bivalves http://www.jaxshells.org/atlanticb.htm Gastropods http://www.jaxshells.org/atlantic.htm Crustaceans http://www.jaxshells.org/slifex26.htm Echinoderms http://www.jaxshells.org/eich26.htm 2 PROTOZOA (FORAMINIFERA) ................................................................................................................................ 4 PORIFERA (SPONGES) ............................................................................................................................................... 4 CNIDARIA (JELLYFISHES, HYDROIDS, SEA ANEMONES) ............................................................................... 4 CTENOPHORA (COMB JELLIES)............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]