Mounting NTFS

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Mounting NTFS Synopsis: The FreeBSD Operating System natively uses the Unix File System (UFS2) and also offers native support for ISO9600 CD, NFS, UDF, ZFS, EXT2, EXT3, EXT4 (in 12.0-Release) and MSDOS. The NTFS (NT Filesystem) is the default filesystem for modern Windows systems. EXFAT filesystem can be natively read and written by both Windows and MacOS, making it an excellent cross-platform filesystem for USB pen drives. To support NTFS and EXFAT, we'll install FuseFS from FreeBSD Ports. I. Installation FuseFS is included in the FreeBSD Ports and it requires Perl5 as a dependency. # # cd /usr/ports/sysutils/fusefs-ntfs && make install clean # Use the default compile options: Now the actual installation will proceed. The compiler and installation process takes only a few minutes to install the program on the Celeron 1.6G system. II.Configuration 1. If FuseFS has already been installed to support EXFAT, skip steps 1-3. Otherwise, add the start up to the rc.conf file: # # echo 'fusefs_enable="YES"' >> /etc/rc.conf # echo 'fusefs_safe="YES"' >> /etc/rc.conf # echo 'fusefs_safe_evil="YES"' >> /etc/rc.conf # 2. Load fuse for FreeBSD kernel In /boot/loader.conf add: # # echo 'fuse_load="YES"' >> /boot/loader.conf # 3. Manually load kernel module: # # kldload fuse # 4. Create mount points for NTFS # # mkdir /mnt/ntfs # 5. Plug in an already NTFS formatted USB pen drive. Check the console message showing the device name. Example /dev/da0 Check the partition name on the device, assuming it is GPT partitioned. # # gpart show /dev/da0 # 6. Typically, a flash drive will only have one partition, /dev/da0s1. note: sometimes "p" (partition) is used instead of "s" (slice) in naming. Mount the device for NTFS or EXFAT depending on its format and device name. # # mount.ntfs /dev/da0s1 /mnt/ntfs # 7. To unmount and eject flash drive # # umount /mnt/ntfs # camcontrol eject da0 # .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Cryptomator Documentation Release 1.5.0
Cryptomator Documentation Release 1.5.0 Cryptobot Sep 15, 2021 Desktop 1 Setup 3 1.1 Windows...............................................3 1.2 macOS................................................3 1.3 Linux.................................................3 2 Getting Started 5 3 Adding Vaults 7 3.1 Create a New Vault..........................................8 3.2 Open an Existing Vault........................................ 13 4 Accessing Vaults 15 4.1 Unlocking a Vault.......................................... 16 4.2 Working with the Unlocked Vault.................................. 17 4.3 Locking a vault............................................ 18 5 Password And Recovery Key 21 5.1 Change Password........................................... 21 5.2 Show Recovery Key......................................... 22 5.3 Reset Password............................................ 23 6 Vault Mounting 27 6.1 General Adapter Selection...................................... 27 6.2 Options applicable to all Systems and Adapters........................... 27 6.3 WebDAV-specific options...................................... 28 6.4 Dokany-specific options....................................... 28 6.5 FUSE-specific options........................................ 28 7 Vault Management 29 7.1 Remove Vaults............................................ 29 7.2 Reorder Vaults............................................ 29 7.3 Vault Options............................................. 29 8 Setup 33 8.1 Google PlayStore..........................................
[Show full text]
To FUSE Or Not to FUSE? Analysis and Performance Characterization of the FUSE User-Space File System Framework
To FUSE or not to FUSE? Analysis and Performance Characterization of the FUSE User-Space File System Framework A Thesis Presented by Bharath Kumar Reddy Vangoor to The Graduate School in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Computer Science Stony Brook University Technical Report FSL-16-02 December 2016 Copyright by Bharath Kumar Reddy Vangoor 2016 Stony Brook University The Graduate School Bharath Kumar Reddy Vangoor We, the thesis committee for the above candidate for the Master of Science degree, hereby recommend acceptance of this thesis. Signature: Dr. Erez Zadok, Thesis Advisor Professor, Computer Science Signature: Dr. Mike Ferdman, Thesis Committee Chair Assistant Professor, Computer Science Signature: Dr. Vasily Tarasov IBM Research – Almaden This thesis is accepted by the Graduate School Charles Taber Dean of the Graduate School ii Abstract of the Thesis To FUSE or not to FUSE? Analysis and Performance Characterization of the FUSE User-Space File System Framework by Bharath Kumar Reddy Vangoor Master of Science in Computer Science Stony Brook University December 2016 Traditionally, file systems were implemented as part of operating systems kernels, which provide a limited set of tools and facilities to a programmer. As complexity of file systems grew, many new file systems began being developed in user space. Low performance is considered the main disadvan- tage of user-space file systems but the extent of this problem has never been explored systematically. As a result, the topic of user-space file systems remains rather controversial: while some consider user-space file systems a “toy” not to be used in production, others develop full-fledged production file systems in user space.
[Show full text]
The Android Platform Security Model∗
The Android Platform Security Model∗ RENÉ MAYRHOFER, Google and Johannes Kepler University Linz JEFFREY VANDER STOEP, Google CHAD BRUBAKER, Google NICK KRALEVICH, Google Android is the most widely deployed end-user focused operating system. With its growing set of use cases encompassing communication, navigation, media consumption, entertainment, finance, health, and access to sensors, actuators, cameras, or microphones, its underlying security model needs to address a host of practical threats in a wide variety of scenarios while being useful to non-security experts. The model needs to strike a difficult balance between security, privacy, and usability for end users, assurances for app developers, and system performance under tight hardware constraints. While many of the underlying design principles have implicitly informed the overall system architecture, access control mechanisms, and mitigation techniques, the Android security model has previously not been formally published. This paper aims to both document the abstract model and discuss its implications. Based on a definition of the threat model and Android ecosystem context in which it operates, we analyze how the different security measures in past and current Android implementations work together to mitigate these threats. There are some special cases in applying the security model, and we discuss such deliberate deviations from the abstract model. CCS Concepts: • Security and privacy → Software and application security; Domain-specific security and privacy architectures; Operating systems security; • Human-centered computing → Ubiquitous and mobile devices. Additional Key Words and Phrases: Android, security, operating system, informal model 1 INTRODUCTION Android is, at the time of this writing, the most widely deployed end-user operating system.
[Show full text]
Design and Implementation of an Intelligent Gaming Agent Using A* Algorithm and Finite State Machines
International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology. ISSN 0974-3154, Volume 13, Number 2 (2020), pp. 191-206 © International Research Publication House. https://dx.doi.org/10.37624/IJERT/13.2.2020.191-206 Design and Implementation of an Intelligent Gaming Agent Using A* Algorithm and Finite State Machines Adekanmi Adeyinka Adegun1, Roseline Oluwaseun Ogundokun2, *, Samuel Ogbonyomi3 and Peter O. Sadiku4 1, 2, 3Department of Computer Science, Landmark University Omu Aran, Kwara State, Nigeria. 4Department of Computer Science, University of Ilorin, Kwara State, Nigeria. *ORCID: 0000-0002-2592-2824 Abstract Artificial Intelligence (AI) is the field within Computer Science that seeks to explain and to emulate some or all The last decade has seen Artificial Intelligence (AI) seep into aspects of human intelligence through mechanical or the game development industry, mainly for the purpose of computational processes. Included among these aspects of developing more human-like non-player characters (NPCs) to intelligence are the ability to interact with the environment improve player experience. This study focuses on solving the through sensory means and the ability to make decisions in problem of player experience with respect to AI controlled unforeseen circumstances without human intervention. gaming agents. The main aim of the study is to develop an Typical areas of research in AI include game playing, natural intelligent gaming agent by implementing A* Pathfinding and language understanding and synthesis, computer vision, Finite State Machines. For the implementation, problem solving, learning, and robotics (Restu, 2015). Over Mixamo/Adobe Fuse was used to model the 3D characters the years, there has been an increase in the need for Artificial (PC and NPCs), the A* Pathfinding component was Intelligence in Game Development.
[Show full text]
Bygone Battles
LINUX USER Retro-Gaming Emulating Legacy Game Platforms Bygone Battles Do you miss your trusty Sinclair Spectrum? Do you long for the Commodore you know only in your history books? Old platforms come alive using the tools of the retro-gamers. BY IAN POINTER efore the computer industry set- tled on the IBM PC, there were Bmany different types of computers with exotic-sounding names like Enter- prise, Oric, Dragon, Electron, Spectrum, and Amiga. Although these machines are no longer with us, most of these legacy systems sill have ardent fans that keep their memory alive. These fans prefer the simplicity of the older era – when pro- grams had to fit inside tiny quantities of memory and programmers had to use Gavin Banns,Gavin www.visipix.com every trick they could imagine to get the most out of a computer – to the fast processors and gigabytes storage of today. These enthusiasts are more common than you might think; the coming of the Internet has allowed people from all across the world to reminisce about the past, and for the last eight years, a Clas- can even use Linux to develop new pro- found at http://www.libsdl.org. It is sic Gaming Expo (http://www.cgexpo. grams for these old computers. probably best to download the source com) has been held in America, with and build it manually, so you can be sure exhibitions from big arcade firms like Sinclair Spectrum it doesn’t use older graphics systems like Midway and Konami, plus lectures from The Spectrum, released in 1982, was the svgalib.
[Show full text]
LINUX JOURNAL | Issue 284 | March 2018
What’s New Shell Scripting Raspberry Pi in Qubes 4 Security Alternatives Since 1994: The original magazine of the Linux community DEEP DIVE BLOCKCHAIN PLUS POSTGRESQL 10 The Latest and Most Interesting Features BITCOIN AND TAXES Cryptocurrency and Uncle Sam LINUXBOOT FOSS Project Spotlight ISSUE 284 | MARCH 2018 www.linuxjournal.com MARCH 2018 CONTENTS ISSUE 284 DEEP DIVE: Blockchain 95 Blockchain, Part I: Introduction and Cryptocurrency by Petros Koutoupis What makes both bitcoin and blockchain so exciting? What do they provide? Why is everyone talking about this? And, what does the future hold? 105 Blockchain, Part II: Configuring a Blockchain Network and Leveraging the Technology by Petros Koutoupis How to set up a private etherium blockchain using open-source tools and a look at some markets and industries where blockchain technologies can add value. 2 | March 2018 | http://www.linuxjournal.com CONTENTS 6 From the Editor—Doc Searls Help Us Cure Online Publishing of Its Addiction to Personal Data UPFRONT 18 FOSS Project Spotlight: LinuxBoot by David Hendricks, Ron Minnich, Chris Koch and Andrea Barberio 24 Readers’ Choice Awards 26 Shorter Commands by Kyle Rankin 29 For Open-Source Software, the Developers Are All of Us by Derek Zimmer 32 Taking Python to the Next Level by Joey Bernard 37 Learning IT Fundamentals by Kyle Rankin 40 Introducing Zero-K, a Real-Time Strategy Game for Linux by Oflameo 45 News Briefs COLUMNS 46 Kyle Rankin’s Hack and / What’s New in Qubes 4 52 Reuven M. Lerner’s At the Forge PostgreSQL 10: a Great New Version for a Great Database 64 Shawn Powers’ The Open-Source Classroom Cryptocurrency and the IRS 72 Zack Brown’s diff -u What’s New in Kernel Development 76 Susan Sons’ Under the Sink Security: 17 Things 86 Dave Taylor’s Work the Shell Shell Scripting and Security 178 Glyn Moody’s Open Sauce Looking Back: What Was Happening Ten Years Ago? LINUX JOURNAL (ISSN 1075-3583) is published monthly by Linux Journal, LLC.
[Show full text]
Refuse: Userspace FUSE Reimplementation Using Puffs
ReFUSE: Userspace FUSE Reimplementation Using puffs Antti Kantee Alistair Crooks Helsinki University of Technology The NetBSD Foundation [email protected].fi [email protected] Abstract for using Gmail as a file system storage backend and FUSEPod [5] which facilitaties iPod access and man- In an increasingly diverse and splintered world, agement. interoperability rules. The ability to leverage code Userspace file systems operate by attaching an in- written for another platform means more time and re- kernel file system to the kernel’s virtual file system sources for doing new and exciting research instead layer, vfs [17]. This component transforms incoming of reinventing the wheel. Interoperability requires requests into a form suitable for delivery to userspace, standards, and as the saying goes, the best part of sends the request to userspace, waits for a response, standards is that everyone can have their own. How- interprets the result and feeds it back to caller in the ever, in the userspace file system world, the Linux- kernel. The kernel file system calling conventions originated FUSE is the clear yardstick. dictate how to interface with the virtual file system In this paper we present ReFUSE, a userspace layer, but other than that the userspace file systems implementation of the FUSE interface on top of the framework is free to decide how to operate and what NetBSD native puffs (Pass-to-Userspace Framework kind of interface to provide to userspace. File System) userspace file systems framework. We While extending the operating system to userspace argue that an additional layer of indirection is the is not a new idea [12, 21], the FUSE [2] userspace right solution here, as it allows for a more natural file systems interface is the first to become a veri- export of the kernel file system interface instead of table standard.
[Show full text]
Extension Framework for File Systems in User Space
Extension Framework for File Systems in User space Ashish Bijlani and Umakishore Ramachandran, Georgia Institute of Technology https://www.usenix.org/conference/atc19/presentation/bijlani This paper is included in the Proceedings of the 2019 USENIX Annual Technical Conference. July 10–12, 2019 • Renton, WA, USA ISBN 978-1-939133-03-8 Open access to the Proceedings of the 2019 USENIX Annual Technical Conference is sponsored by USENIX. Extension Framework for File Systems in User space Ashish Bijlani Umakishore Ramachandran Georgia Institute of Technology Georgia Institute of Technology Abstract space. This design offers flexibility to developers to easily implement their functionality and apply custom optimizations, User file systems offer numerous advantages over their in- but also incurs a high overhead due to frequent user-kernel kernel implementations, such as ease of development and bet- switching and data copying. For example, despite several ter system reliability. However, they incur heavy performance recent optimizations, even a simple passthrough FUSE file penalty. We observe that existing user file system frameworks system can introduce up to 83% overhead on an SSD [50]. are highly general; they consist of a minimal interposition As a result, some FUSE file systems have been replaced by layer in the kernel that simply forwards all low-level requests alternative implementations in production [8, 22, 24]. to user space. While this design offers flexibility, it also severely degrades performance due to frequent kernel-user There have been attempts to address performance issues context switching. of user file system frameworks, for example, by eliminating user-kernel switching in FUSE under certain scenarios [28, This work introduces EXTFUSE, a framework for develop- ing extensible user file systems that also allows applications 34].
[Show full text]
Intel SGX Explained
Intel SGX Explained Victor Costan and Srinivas Devadas [email protected], [email protected] Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology ABSTRACT Data Owner’s Remote Computer Computer Intel’s Software Guard Extensions (SGX) is a set of Untrusted Software extensions to the Intel architecture that aims to pro- vide integrity and confidentiality guarantees to security- Computation Container Dispatcher sensitive computation performed on a computer where Setup Computation Setup all the privileged software (kernel, hypervisor, etc) is Private Code Receive potentially malicious. Verification Encrypted This paper analyzes Intel SGX, based on the 3 pa- Results Private Data pers [14, 79, 139] that introduced it, on the Intel Software Developer’s Manual [101] (which supersedes the SGX Owns Manages manuals [95, 99]), on an ISCA 2015 tutorial [103], and Trusts Authors on two patents [110, 138]. We use the papers, reference Trusts manuals, and tutorial as primary data sources, and only draw on the patents to fill in missing information. Data Owner Software Infrastructure This paper does not reflect the information available Provider Owner in two papers [74, 109] that were published after the first Figure 1: Secure remote computation. A user relies on a remote version of this paper. computer, owned by an untrusted party, to perform some computation This paper’s contributions are a summary of the on her data. The user has some assurance of the computation’s Intel-specific architectural and micro-architectural details integrity and confidentiality. needed to understand SGX, a detailed and structured pre- sentation of the publicly available information on SGX, uploads the desired computation and data into the secure a series of intelligent guesses about some important but container.
[Show full text]
Moosefs 3.0 User's Manual
MooseFS 3.0 User's Manual Core Technology Development & Support Team January 7, 2017 c 2014-2017 v. 1.0.5 Piotr Robert Konopelko, Core Technology Development & Support Team. All rights reserved. Proofread by Agata Kruszona-Zawadzka Coordination & layout by Piotr Robert Konopelko. Please send corrections to Piotr Robert Konopelko { [email protected]. 1 Contents 1 About MooseFS 6 1.1 Architecture . .6 1.2 How does the system work . .8 1.3 Fault tolerance . .9 1.4 Platforms . 10 2 Moose File System Requirements 11 2.1 Network requirements . 11 2.2 Requirements for Master Servers . 11 2.2.1 CPU . 11 2.2.2 RAM size . 12 2.2.3 HDD free space . 12 2.3 Requirements for Metalogger(s) . 12 2.4 Requirements for Chunkservers . 13 2.4.1 CPU . 13 2.4.2 RAM size . 13 2.4.3 HDD space . 13 2.5 Requirements for Clients / Mounts . 13 3 Installing MooseFS 3.0 15 3.1 Conﬁguring DNS Server . 15 3.2 Adding repositories . 16 3.2.1 Ubuntu / Debian . 16 3.2.2 RedHat / CentOS (EL7) . 16 3.2.3 RedHat / CentOS (EL6) . 17 3.2.4 Apple MacOS X . 17 3.3 Diﬀerences in package names between MooseFS Pro and MooseFS . 17 3.4 MooseFS Master Server(s) installation . 18 3.5 MooseFS CGI Monitor, CGI Server and Command Line Interface installation . 19 3.6 Chunk servers installation . 20 3.7 MooseFS Clients installation . 20 3.8 Enabling MooseFS services during OS boot . 22 3.8.1 RedHat / Centos (EL6) . 22 3.8.2 RedHat / Centos (EL7) .
[Show full text]
File System Tricks for Audio Production
Audio Engineering Society Convention Paper Presented at the 125th Convention 2008 October 2{5 San Francisco, CA, USA The papers at this Convention have been selected on the basis of a submitted abstract and extended precis that have been peer reviewed by at least two qualified anonymous reviewers. This convention paper has been reproduced from the author's advance manuscript, without editing, corrections, or consideration by the Review Board. The AES takes no responsibility for the contents. Additional papers may be obtained by sending request and remittance to Audio Engineering Society, 60 East 42nd Street, New York, New York 10165-2520, USA; also see www.aes.org. All rights reserved. Reproduction of this paper, or any portion thereof, is not permitted without direct permission from the Journal of the Audio Engineering Society. File System Tricks for Audio Production Michael Hlatky1, Sebastian Heise1, and Jörn Loviscach1 1Hochschule Bremen (University of Applied Sciences), 28199 Bremen, Germany Correspondence should be addressed to JörnLoviscach ([email protected]) ABSTRACT Not every file presented by a computer operating system needs to be an actual stream of independent bits. We demonstrate that different types of virtual files and folders including so-called \Filesystems in Userspace" (FUSE) allow streamlining audio content management with relatively little additional complexity. For instance, an off-the-shelf database system may present a distributed sound library through (seemingly) standard files in a project-specific hierarchy with no physical copying of the data involved. Regions of audio files may be represented as separate files; audio effect plug-ins may be displayed as collections of folders for on-demand processing while files are read.
[Show full text]
HPSSFS-FUSE Administrator's Guide
HPSSFS-FUSE Administrator’s Guide i HPSSFS-FUSE Administrator’s Guide HPSSFS-FUSE Administrator’s Guide ii Copyright © 2016 International Business Machines Corporation HPSSFS-FUSE Administrator’s Guide iii REVISION HISTORY NUMBER DATE DESCRIPTION NAME Rev 631 12/15/2014 First draft. MJT Rev 634 12/17/2014 Better junction support for NFS. MJT Rev 663 01/21/2015 Keep checksum processing synchronous for MJT NFSv4. Rev 679 02/05/2015 Fix ioctl(2) example bugs. MJT Rev 685 02/05/2015 Add info about updatedb(8). MJT Rev 698 03/02/2015 Update prerequisites. MJT Rev 734 04/01/2015 Add ACL support. MJT Rev 748 04/07/2015 Add capability to undelete. MJT Rev 753 04/21/2015 Add striped I/O. MJT Rev 762 07/02/2015 Add capability to undelete directories. MJT Rev 770 07/17/2015 Add system.hpss.purgelock xattr. MJT Rev 781 08/31/2015 Add "Upgrading from HPSSFS" section. MJT Rev 786 09/03/2015 Add system.hpssfs.info and system.hpssfs.opens MJT xattrs. Rev 804 02/12/2016 Add Python examples. MJT Rev 806 02/15/2016 Add var mount option. MJT Rev 809 02/17/2016 Remove "Specialized Logging" section. MJT Rev 848 06/20/2016 Update documentation for libfuse 2.9.7 release. MJT HPSSFS-FUSE Administrator’s Guide iv REVISION HISTORY NUMBER DATE DESCRIPTION NAME Rev 874 09/23/2016 Add ’[no]cksumatime’ mount options. MJT Rev 881 09/23/2016 Add support to change API log level/path at MJT runtime. Rev 882 09/23/2016 Add disk PV names to system.hpss.level xattr.
[Show full text]