DOCSLIB.ORG

Repression of the 2007 Popular Protests in Burma

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Repression of the 2007 Popular Protests in Burma December 2007 Volume 19, No. 18(C) Crackdown Repression of the 2007 Popular Protests in Burma Map of Burma........................................................................................................... 1 Map of Rangoon.......................................................................................................2 Map of Downtown Rangoon......................................................................................3 I. Summary...............................................................................................................5 II. Crackdown After Crackdown: 45 Years of Military Rule ....................................... 15 Burma’s Economy: Poverty and Price Rises Spark Protests ................................ 21 III. Price Hikes, Peaceful Protests, and the Initial Reaction of the Authorities.........23 IV. The Monks Join the Protests............................................................................. 28 “Overturning of the Bowls”: The Monks’ Decision to Boycott the SPDC .............. 31 The Monks March in Rangoon ...........................................................................33 September 17 ..............................................................................................33 September 18..............................................................................................33 September 19 ..............................................................................................36 September 20..............................................................................................37 September 21 ..............................................................................................38 The NLD and Student Groups Rejoin the Protests...............................................39 V. The Crackdown...................................................................................................43 The Government Acts to End the Protests ..........................................................43 The Last Day of Peaceful Protests: September 25...............................................44 September 25-26: The Crackdown Begins..........................................................45 Crackdown at Shwedagon Pagoda ...............................................................46 Attacks on Protesters near Sule Pagoda.......................................................52 Shootings near Thakin Mya Park..................................................................52 Continued Protests on September 26...........................................................54 September 27: Attacks on and Emptying of the Monasteries.............................. 55 Emptying of the Monasteries ....................................................................... 55 Shooting at Sule Pagoda .............................................................................63 Killings at Basic Education High School 3 (High School 3) in Tamwe............ 69 Order Through Violence: September 28-29........................................................76 September 28: Despair and Rage.................................................................76 September 29: “The streets were full of soldiers” ........................................79 VI. The Continuing Night Time Raids: Monasteries and Wanted Organizers............81 The Fate of the Monks .......................................................................................81 The Continuing Arrest Campaign..................................................................83 VII. Detention Centers and Abuses ........................................................................ 90 The Large-Scale Ad Hoc Detention Facilities ..................................................... 90 City Hall...................................................................................................... 90 Kyaik Ka San Race Course........................................................................... 90 Government Technical Institute (GTI) ...........................................................92 Insein Prison and Other Official Detention Centers ............................................95 VIII. Security Agencies Involved in the Crackdown................................................. 98 Army Units.................................................................................................. 99 Military Security Affairs..............................................................................102 Police Units and Lon Htein Riot Police........................................................ 103 Special Branch Police ................................................................................ 104 The Role of “Mass-Based” Organizations for Social Control........................ 105 IX. Recommendations .......................................................................................... 112 Sanctions ....................................................................................................... 112 Humanitarian aid .............................................................................................114 To the United Nations Security Council.............................................................115 To the United Nations Secretary General and Special Envoy Ibrahim Gambari.. 116 To the United Nations Human Rights Council................................................... 116 To the Government of Australia ........................................................................117 To the Government of China ............................................................................ 118 To the European Union and its Member States ................................................ 119 To the Government of India .............................................................................120 To the Government of Japan ............................................................................ 121 To the Government of Russia........................................................................... 121 To the Government of Singapore ..................................................................... 122 To the Government of Thailand........................................................................ 122 To the Government of the United States .......................................................... 123 To the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) .................................. 124 Regarding Companies Operating or Investing in Burma ................................... 125 Regarding refugees ......................................................................................... 125 Appendix I: Glossary ............................................................................................126 Acknowledgements..............................................................................................129 Map of Burma Map of Rangoon Crackdown 2 Map of Downtown Rangoon 3 Human Rights Watch December 2007 I. Summary In August and September 2007, Burmese democracy activists, monks and ordinary people took to the streets of Rangoon and elsewhere to peacefully challenge nearly two decades of dictatorial rule and economic mismanagement by Burma’s ruling generals. While opposition to the military government is widespread in Burma, and small acts of resistance are an everyday occurrence, military repression is so systematic that such sentiment rarely is able to burst into public view; the last comparable public uprising was in August 1988. As in 1988, the generals responded this time with a brutal and bloody crackdown, leaving Burma’s population once again struggling for a voice. The government crackdown included baton-charges and beatings of unarmed demonstrators, mass arbitrary arrests, and repeated instances where weapons were fired shoot-to-kill. To remove the monks and nuns from the protests, the security forces raided dozens of Buddhist monasteries during the night, and sought to enforce the defrocking of thousands of monks. Current protest leaders, opposition party members, and activists from the ’88 Generation students were tracked down and arrested – and continue to be arrested and detained. The Burmese generals have taken draconian measures to ensure that the world does not learn the true story of the horror of their crackdown. They have kept foreign journalists out of Burma and maintained their complete control over domestic news. Many local journalists were arrested after the crackdown, and the internet and mobile phone networks, used extensively to send information, photos, and videos out of Burma, were temporarily shut down, and have remained tightly controlled since. Of course, those efforts at censorship were only partially successful, as some enterprising and brave individuals found ways to get mobile phone video footage of the demonstrations and crackdown out of the country and onto the world’s television screens. This provided a small window into the violence and repression that the Burmese military government continues to use to hold onto power. 5 Human Rights Watch December 2007 This report, based on more than 100 in-depth interviews conducted by Human Rights Watch researchers with eyewitnesses to the events in Rangoon, offers a detailed account of the protests and the brutal crackdown and mass arrest campaign that followed. It is based on interviews with monks and ordinary citizens who participated in the protests, as well as leading monks, protest organizers and international officials. Our report focuses on the events in Rangoon.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Myanmar's Spring Revolution
    EUROPEAN POLICY BRIEF MYANMAR ’S SPRING REVOLUTION : A PEOPLE ’S REVOLUTION Myanmar’s Spring Revolution is a grassroots, bottom-to-top nationwide resistance against the military ruling class that retook state power in February 2021. It is unprecedented in scale, fascinating in form and shows a profound societal change within the country. Michal Lubina , April 2021 INTRODUCTION A People’s revolution Myanmar’s Spring Revolution is a grassroots, bottom-to-top nationwide resistance against the military ruling class that retook state power in February 2021. It is unprecedented in scale, fascinating in form and shows a profound societal change within the country. EVIDENCE AND ANALYSIS The end of hermit country Burma has traditionally been called a hermit country 1 – a designation not uncommon in Asia (Bhutan and especially Korea were similarly named), yet very fitting in the case of Myanmar. Precolonial Burmese kingdoms were generally inward-looking, with periods of sometimes spectacular external expeditions being exceptions rather than the rule. Some believed Burma’s isolation was due to economic self-sufficiency, others ascribed it to geography. Still others looked for explanations in the cultural realm, believing - like Aung San Suu Kyi in her early writings 2 - that Buddhism made Burmese uninterested in foreign ideas. Whatever the reasons, it was only the colonial period that brought Burma into the global, capitalist world, however imperfectly: “Burma had been thrown open to the world, but the world had not been opened up to Burma.” 3 This forceful incursion inflicted wounds that never healed. That is why after the creative and chaotic decade of the 1950s (somewhat similar to the last ten years), Burma reverted to self-isolation after the 1962 1 Gustaaf Houtman, Mental Culture in Burmese Crisis Politics: Aung San Suu Kyi and the National League for Democracy, ISLCAA Tokyo 1999, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Viewership and Listenership Survey
    VIEWERSHIP & Listenership Survey Lashio & North Okkalapa Research conducted by Ah Yo, Su Mon, Soe Win Myint with the FEBRUARY 2017 assistance of LRC in Lashio, Saitta Thukha Development Institute in REPORT WRITTEN BY: North Okkalapa, and Xavey Research Solutions. Anna Zongollowicz, PhD FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Isla Glaister Country, Director of Search for Common Ground - Myanmar Email: [email protected] VIEWERSHIP & LISTENERSHIP SURVEY Lashio & North Okkalapa 2 CONTENTS Executive Summary 4 TV 5 Radio 6 Social Media 6 Reaction to News 6 Conclusion 7 Recommendations 7 Listenership & Viewership Survey 8 Introduction 8 Youth 9 Media 9 Methodology 11 Sampling 12 Limitations 12 Findings 13 Demographics 13 TV Viewership 14 Radio Listenership 16 Social Media 17 Reaction to News 18 Conclusion 19 Recommendations 20 References 21 SEARCH FOR COMMON GROUND VIEWERSHIP & LISTENERSHIP SURVEY Lashio & North Okkalapa 3 CONTENTS Executive Summary 4 TV 5 Radio 6 Social Media 6 Reaction to News 6 Conclusion 7 Recommendations 7 Listenership & Viewership Survey 8 Introduction 8 Youth 9 Media 9 Methodology 11 Sampling 12 Limitations 12 Findings 13 Demographics 13 TV Viewership 14 Radio Listenership 16 Social Media 17 © Search for Common Ground - Myanmar (2017) Disclaimer Reaction to News 18 The research has been carried out with the financial assistance of the Peace Support Fund. Conclusion 19 The opinions expressed in the report are those of the authors and in no circumstances Recommendations 20 refer to the official views of Search for Common Ground or the Peace Support Fund. References 21 SEARCH FOR COMMON GROUND VIEWERSHIP & LISTENERSHIP SURVEY Lashio & North Okkalapa 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The report contains findings from a quantitative survey examining TV viewership, radio listenership and social media usage, which was conducted in the third week of November 2016 in Lashio (Shan State) and North Okkalapa (Greater Yangon).
    [Show full text]
  • Daw Aung San Suu Kyi and Import Law Dekkhina and President U Win Myint Were and S: 25 of the District Detained
    Current No. Name Sex /Age Father's Name Position Date of Arrest Section of Law Plaintiff Address Remark Condition Superintendent Myanmar Military Seizes Power Kyi Lin of and Senior NLD leaders S: 8 of the Export Special Branch, including Daw Aung San Suu Kyi and Import Law Dekkhina and President U Win Myint were and S: 25 of the District detained. The NLD’s chief Natural Disaster Administrator ministers and ministers in the Management law, (S: 8 and 67), states and regions were also 1 (Daw) Aung San Suu Kyi F General Aung San State Counsellor (Chairman of NLD) 1-Feb-21 Penal Code - Superintendent House Arrest Naypyitaw detained. 505(B), S: 67 of Myint Naing Arrested State Counselor Aung the (S: 25), U Soe San Suu Kyi has been charged in Telecommunicatio Soe Shwe (S: Rangoon on March 25 under ns Law, Official 505 –b), Section 3 of the Official Secrets Secret Act S:3 Superintendent Act. Aung Myo Lwin (S: 3) Myanmar Military Seizes Power S: 25 of the and Senior NLD leaders Natural Disaster including Daw Aung San Suu Kyi Superintendent Management law, and President U Win Myint were Myint Naing, Penal Code - detained. The NLD’s chief 2 (U) Win Myint M U Tun Kyin President (Vice Chairman-1 of NLD) 1-Feb-21 Dekkhina House Arrest Naypyitaw 505(B), S: 67 of ministers and ministers in the District the states and regions were also Administrator Telecommunicatio detained. ns Law Myanmar Military Seizes Power and Senior NLD leaders including Daw Aung San Suu Kyi and President U Win Myint were detained.
    [Show full text]
  • Us Department of the Treasury
    2/12/2021 United States Targets Leaders of Burma’s Military Coup Under New Executive Order | U.S. Department of the Treasury U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY United States Targets Leaders of Burma’s Military Coup Under New Executive Order February 11, 2021 Washington – Today, the Biden administration launched a new sanctions regime in response to the Burmese military’s coup against the democratically elected civilian government of Burma. In coordination with the issuance of a new Executive Order (E.O.), the U.S. Department of the Treasury designated, pursuant to that E.O., 10 individuals and three entities connected to the military apparatus responsible for the coup. The United States will continue to work with partners throughout the region and the world to support the restoration of democracy and the rule of law in Burma, to press for the immediate release of political prisoners, including State Counselor Aung San Suu Kyi and President Win Myint, and to hold accountable those responsible for attempting to reverse Burma’s progress toward democracy. These sanctions specifically target those who played a leading role in the overthrow of Burma’s democratically elected government. The sanctions are not directed at the people of Burma. “As the President has said, the February 1 coup was a direct assault on Burma’s transition to democracy and the rule of law,” said Secretary Janet L. Yellen. “The Treasury Department stands with the people of Burma — and we are doing what we must to help them in their eort to secure freedom and democracy.” “We are also prepared to take additional action should Burma’s military not change course.
    [Show full text]
  • That Is Necessary
    Belmont University Belmont Digital Repository Honors Theses Belmont Honors Program 4-20-2020 All That Is Necessary Jes Martinez Belmont University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.belmont.edu/honors_theses Part of the Screenwriting Commons Recommended Citation Martinez, Jes, "All That Is Necessary" (2020). Honors Theses. 23. https://repository.belmont.edu/honors_theses/23 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Belmont Honors Program at Belmont Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Belmont Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ALL THAT IS NECESSARY written by Jes Martinez Based on Real Events DRAFT B [email protected] (703) 340-5100 TIGHT ON: an ANIMATED MAP of the world. It ZOOMS INTO INDIA and SOUTHEAST ASIA, c. 1050 AD. Then ZOOMS INTO the PAGAN EMPIRE. A WALL OF RED, the MONGOL INVASION, washes over the empire, from the North, c. 1287 AD. The RED DISSOLVES and various CITY-STATES sprout up, rising and falling as they war with each other. EMMA (V.O.) Myanmar’s diverse demographic landscape emerged out of centuries of migration, invasion, and internal turmoil. The city-states DISSOLVE into the rise and fall of dynasties: the PEGU, BAGO, and HANTHARWADDY DYNASTIES (1287-1599), the PINYA DYNASTY (1309-60), the SAGAING DYNASTY (1315-64), the INWA DYNASTY (1365-1555), the TAUNGOO DYNASTY (1486-1752), and the KONBAUNG DYNASTY (1752-1885). EMMA (V.O.) Britain colonized the region-- then called Burma-- and deepened ethno- religious resentments by establishing a system of indirect rule in which they empowered local leaders from the minority groups while suppressing the majority Buddhist Bamar, lighting the flame for the wildfire that Burman religious nationalism was to become.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S.-Japan Approaches to Democracy Promotion
    U.S. JAPAN APPROACHES TO DEMOCRACY PROMOTION U.S. JAPAN Sasakawa Peace Foundation USA 1819 L St NW #300 Washington, DC 20036 [email protected] U.S.-JAPAN APPROACHES TO DEMOCRACY SASAKAWA USA SASAKAWA PROMOTION Edited by Michael R. Auslin and Daniel E. Bob ISBN 9780996656764 51000 > 9 780996 656764 U.S.-JAPAN APPROACHES TO DEMOCRACY PROMOTION Edited by Michael R. Auslin Daniel E. Bob Sasakawa Peace Foundation USA Sasakawa Peace Foundation USA is an independent, American non-profit and non- partisan institution devoted to research, analysis and better understanding of the U.S.-Japan relationship. Sasakawa USA accomplishes its mission through programs that benefit both nations and the broader Asia Pacific region. Our research programs focus on security, diplomacy, economics, trade and technology, and our education programs facilitate people-to-people exchange and discussion among American and Japanese policymakers, influential citizens and the broader public in both countries. ISBN: 978-0-9966567-6-4 Printed in the United States of America. © 2017 by Sasakawa Peace Foundation USA LCCN Number applied for Sasakawa USA does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views expressed herein are the authors’ own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Sasakawa USA, its staff or its board. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by and means without permission in writing from Sasakawa USA. Please direct inquiries to: Sasakawa Peace Foundation USA Research Department 1819 L Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20036 P: +1 202-296-6694 This publication can be downloaded at no cost at http://spfusa.org/ Cover photo: © EPA/Barbara Walton Contents Preface .............................................................................................................................v Dennis Blair and Yasushi Akashi INTRODUCTION U.S.-Japan Approaches to Democracy Promotion ............................................
    [Show full text]
  • (BRI) in Myanmar
    MYANMAR POLICY BRIEFING | 22 | November 2019 Selling the Silk Road Spirit: China’s Belt and Road Initiative in Myanmar Key points • Rather than a ‘grand strategy’ the BRI is a broad and loosely governed framework of activities seeking to address a crisis in Chinese capitalism. Almost any activity, implemented by any actor in any place can be included under the BRI framework and branded as a ‘BRI project’. This allows Chinese state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and provincial governments to promote their own projects in pursuit of profit and economic growth. Where necessary, the central Chinese government plays a strong politically support- ive role. It also maintains a semblance of control and leadership over the initiative as a whole. But with such a broad framework, and a multitude of actors involved, the Chinese government has struggled to effectively govern BRI activities. • The BRI is the latest initiative in three decades of efforts to promote Chinese trade and investment in Myanmar. Following the suspension of the Myitsone hydropower dam project and Myanmar’s political and economic transition to a new system of quasi-civilian government in the early 2010s, Chinese companies faced greater competition in bidding for projects and the Chinese Government became frustrated. The rift between the Myanmar government and the international community following the Rohingya crisis in Rakhine State provided the Chinese government with an opportunity to rebuild closer ties with their counterparts in Myanmar. The China-Myanmar Economic Corridor (CMEC) was launched as the primary mechanism for BRI activities in Myanmar, as part of the Chinese government’s economic approach to addressing the conflicts in Myanmar.
    [Show full text]
  • Business Conglomerates in the Context of Myanmar's Economic
    Chapter 6 Business Conglomerates in the Context of Myanmar’s Economic Reform Aung Min and Toshihiro Kudo Abstract The purpose of this paper is to identify the role of conglomerates in the context of Myanmar’s economic reform process. The paper addresses the research question of the role of business conglomerates and the Myanmar economy, such as are they growth engines or just political cronies? We select some of the top conglomerates in Myanmar and assess their profile, performance, and strategies and examine the sources of growth and limitations for future growth and prospects. The top groups chosen for this paper are Htoo, Kanbawza, Max, Asia World, IGE, Shwe Taung, Serge Pun Associates (SPA)/First Myanmar Investment Group of Companies (FMI), Loi Hein, IBTC, Myanmar Economic Corporation (MEC), and Union of Myanmar Economic Holdings Ltd. (UMEHL). There are other local conglomerates that this paper does not address and they include Shwe Than Lwin Group, Eden Group, Capital and Dagon International etc., which are suggested for further research about Myanmar’s conglomerates in the future. Sources of growth and key success factors of the top business groups are their connection with government, contact with foreign partners, and their competency in the past and present. In the context of the economic reform, previously favored business people appear to recognize that the risks of challenging economic reform could outweigh the likely benefits. In addition, some of the founders and top management of the conglomerates are still subject to US sanctions. Market openness, media monitoring, competition by local and foreign players, sanctions, and the changing trends of policy and the economy limit the growth of conglomerates.
    [Show full text]
  • Election Monitor No.49
    Euro-Burma Office 10 November 22 November 2010 Election Monitor ELECTION MONITOR NO. 49 DIPLOMATS OF FOREIGN MISSIONS OBSERVE VOTING PROCESS IN VARIOUS STATES AND REGIONS Representatives of foreign embassies and UN agencies based in Myanmar, members of the Myanmar Foreign Correspondents Club and local journalists observed the polling stations and studied the casting of votes at a number of polling stations on the day of the elections. According the state-run media, the diplomats and guests were organized into small groups and conducted to the various regions and states to witness the elections. The following are the number of polling stations and number of eligible voters for the various regions and states:1 1. Kachin State - 866 polling stations for 824,968 eligible voters. 2. Magway Region- 4436 polling stations in 1705 wards and villages with 2,695,546 eligible voters 3. Chin State - 510 polling stations with 66827 eligible voters 4. Sagaing Region - 3,307 polling stations with 3,114,222 eligible voters in 125 constituencies 5. Bago Region - 1251 polling stations and 1057656 voters 6. Shan State (North ) - 1268 polling stations in five districts, 19 townships and 839 wards/ villages and there were 1,060,807 eligible voters. 7. Shan State(East) - 506 polling stations and 331,448 eligible voters 8. Shan State (South)- 908,030 eligible voters cast votes at 975 polling stations 9. Mandalay Region - 653 polling stations where more than 85,500 eligible voters 10. Rakhine State - 2824 polling stations and over 1769000 eligible voters in 17 townships in Rakhine State, 1267 polling stations and over 863000 eligible voters in Sittway District and 139 polling stations and over 146000 eligible voters in Sittway Township.
    [Show full text]
  • In Burma, Transition Neglects Press Freedom a Special Report by the Committee to Protect Journalists
    In Burma, transition neglects press freedom A special report by the Committee to Protect Journalists Committee to Protect Journalists In Burma, transition neglects press freedom Thein Sein’s new civilian government has promised reform, but authorities continue to censor and imprison journalists. Those who report for critical, exile-run media remain at great risk. A CPJ special report by Shawn W. Crispin Burma is at a crossroads between a tradition of military control and prospects for a democratic future. (AP/Khin Maung Win) Published September 20, 2011 Away from the probing surveillance of Special Branch intelligence agents, a Burmese editor ticks off the recent stories the Press Scrutiny and Registration Department, Burma’s powerful state censorship body, would not allow him to publish. The banned topics were wide-ranging: volatility in fuel prices; recent land purchases by Chinese investors around the city of Mandalay; a shortage of fresh water near a southern coast development. After his paper published a seemingly innocuous story about the falling price of SIM cards—without the censors’ approval—authorities reacted swiftly in suspending the publication for two weeks. “We are pushing the limits as much as we can,” said the editor during a recent trip to Bangkok. As a small sign of success, he pointed to the publication of a recent series on the struggles of farmers facing high debts. But the censorship process remains arbitrary, intensive, and highly restrictive. “It’s like fighting with a spear while on horseback to get news published. … We must prepare many extra stories each week to fill the spaces for stories that will inevitably be cut,” said the editor, who spoke on condition of anonymity for fear of government reprisal.
    [Show full text]
  • The Resistance of the Monks RIGHTS Buddhism and Activism in Burma WATCH
    Burma HUMAN The Resistance of the Monks RIGHTS Buddhism and Activism in Burma WATCH The Resistance of the Monks Buddhism and Activism in Burma Copyright © 2009 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 1-56432-544-X Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch 350 Fifth Avenue, 34th floor New York, NY 10118-3299 USA Tel: +1 212 290 4700, Fax: +1 212 736 1300 [email protected] Poststraße 4-5 10178 Berlin, Germany Tel: +49 30 2593 06-10, Fax: +49 30 2593 0629 [email protected] Avenue des Gaulois, 7 1040 Brussels, Belgium Tel: + 32 (2) 732 2009, Fax: + 32 (2) 732 0471 [email protected] 64-66 Rue de Lausanne 1202 Geneva, Switzerland Tel: +41 22 738 0481, Fax: +41 22 738 1791 [email protected] 2-12 Pentonville Road, 2nd Floor London N1 9HF, UK Tel: +44 20 7713 1995, Fax: +44 20 7713 1800 [email protected] 27 Rue de Lisbonne 75008 Paris, France Tel: +33 (1)43 59 55 35, Fax: +33 (1) 43 59 55 22 [email protected] 1630 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 500 Washington, DC 20009 USA Tel: +1 202 612 4321, Fax: +1 202 612 4333 [email protected] Web Site Address: http://www.hrw.org September 2009 1-56432-544-X The Resistance of the Monks Buddhism and Activism in Burma I. Summary and Key Recommendations....................................................................................... 1 Methodology ....................................................................................................................... 26 II. Burma: A Long Tradition of Buddhist Activism ....................................................................... 27 Buddhism in Independent Burma During the Parliamentary Period ...................................... 33 Buddhism and the State After the 1962 Military Takeover ...................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Permitted Enterprises by Myanmar Investment Commission (7/2020)
    1 Permitted Enterprises by Myanmar Investment Commission (7/2020) Type of Investment Form of No Name of Company Location Date of issue Remark business Investment 1 Myanmar Hexing Holding No.297/A, 507, Kwin Manufacturing of Wholly Foreign (7/2020) Natural Rubber No. OSS-7, Kyae Taing Pyin Standard Rubber for Owned 22-5-2020 Myanmar Co.,Ltd. Kwin, Wea Win KaYar Village 100% Export Investment Tract, Than PhyuZayat Commission Township, Mawlamyaing District, Mon State 2 Alpha Best Global Plot No. 149, 150, 151, 152, Manufacturing of Wholly Foreign (7/2020) Limited MyayTaing Block No.49, various kinds of shoes on Owned 22-5-2020 Wartayar Industrial Zone, CMP basis Myanmar ShwePyiThar Township, Investment Yangon Region Commission 3 Myanmar HengYa Kampaiti City, Waimaw Construction, Operation Joint Venture (7/2020) Investment Township, Myitkyina District, and Leasing and Sale of 22-5-2020 Myanmar Development Kachin State. Kampaiti Business Park Investment Co., Ltd. Commission 4 Pyi Taw Aye Industrial Kwin No.658, Tat Ywar a Construction, Operation Joint Venture (7/2020) Park Co., Ltd. ShaeKwin,Kalai (Tatkalay) and Leasing of Industrial 22-5-2020 Myanmar 2 Type of Investment Form of No Name of Company Location Date of issue Remark business Investment Village Tract, Kwin No. 658B, Park (Bago) Investment KywethatkanKwin and Kwin Commission No.659B, MayinTaungKwin, Mayin Village Tract, Bago Township, Bago Region. 5 Hanley Group Ltd. Myaytaing Block No.(4/6), Hotel Service Wholly Myanmar (7/2020) Plot No. 1945, Ward -5, Owned 22-5-2020 Myanmar HlaingTharyar Township, Investment Yangon Region. Commission 6 Myat Min Co., Ltd. Kwin No.6/ MahuyarKwin , Supporting Service for Wholly Myanmar (7/2020) Owned 22-5-2020 Plot No.
    [Show full text]